Zen Magnets, LLC; Complaint, 47823-47826 [2012-19693]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2012 / Notices
Industries Extended Employment SWS,
Kansas City, MO
Contracting Activity: Dept of the Army, W071
ENDIST Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–19656 Filed 8–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
Procurement List; Proposed Addition
Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
ACTION: Proposed Addition to the
Procurement List.
AGENCY:
The Committee is proposing
to add a product to the Procurement List
that will be furnished by a nonprofit
agency employing persons who are
blind or have other severe disabilities.
Comments Must Be Received on or
Before: 9/10/2012.
ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800,
1421 Jefferson Davis Highway,
Arlington, Virginia 22202–3259.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT
COMMENTS CONTACT: Barry S. Lineback,
Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703)
603–0655, or email CMTEFedReg@
AbilityOne.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published pursuant to 41
U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its
purpose is to provide interested persons
an opportunity to submit comments on
the proposed action.
Addition
If the Committee approves the
proposed addition, the entities of the
Federal Government identified in this
notice will be required to procure the
product listed below from the nonprofit
agency employing persons who are
blind or have other severe disabilities.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
I certify that the following action will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The major factors considered for this
certification were:
1. If approved, the action will not
result in any additional reporting,
recordkeeping or other compliance
requirements for small entities other
than the small organization that will
furnish the product to the Government.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 Aug 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
2. If approved, the action will result
in authorizing a small entity to furnish
the product to the Government.
3. There are no known regulatory
alternatives which would accomplish
the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 8501–8506) in
connection with the product proposed
for addition to the Procurement List.
Comments on this certification are
invited. Commenters should identify the
statement(s) underlying the certification
on which they are providing additional
information.
End of Certification
The following product is proposed for
addition to the Procurement List for
production by the nonprofit agency
listed:
Product
NSN: 7510–00–NIB–1855—Correction Tape,
Pen Style, Retractable
NPA: Industries for the Blind, Inc., West
Allis, WI
Contracting Activity: General Services
Administration, New York, NY
Coverage: A-List for the Total Government
Requirement as aggregated by the
General Services Administration.
47823
Dated: August 7, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
United States of America
Consumer Product Safety Commission
CPSC Docket No. 12–2.
In the Matter of Zen Magnets, LLC,
Respondent.
Complaint
Nature of Proceedings
1. This is an administrative
enforcement proceeding pursuant to
Section 15 of the Consumer Product
Safety Act (‘‘CPSA’’), as amended, 15
U.S.C. 2064, for public notification and
remedial action to protect the public
from the substantial risks of injury
presented by aggregated masses of highpowered, small rare earth magnets
known as Zen MagnetsTM Rare Earth
Magnetic Balls, imported and
distributed by Zen Magnets, LLC (‘‘Zen’’
or ‘‘Respondent’’).
2. This proceeding is governed by the
Rules of Practice for Adjudicative
Proceedings before the Consumer
Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), 16 CFR Part 1025.
Jurisdiction
Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–19657 Filed 8–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
3. This proceeding is instituted
pursuant to the authority contained in
Sections 15(c), (d), and (f) of the CPSA,
15 U.S.C. 2064(c), (d), and (f).
Parties
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 12–2]
Zen Magnets, LLC; Complaint
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
AGENCY:
Publication of a Complaint
under the Consumer Product Safety Act.
ACTION:
Under provisions of its Rules
of Practice for Adjudicative Proceeding
(16 CFR part 1025), the Consumer
Product Safety Commission must
publish in the Federal Register
Complaints which it issues. Published
below is a Complaint: In the Matter of
Zen Magnets, LLC.1
SUMMARY:
The text of
the Complaint appears below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 The Commission voted 3–1 to authorize
issuance of this Complaint. Chairman Inez M.
Tenenbaum, Commissioner Anne M. Northup and
Commissioner Robert S. Adler voted to authorize
issuance of the Complaint. Commissioner Nancy A.
Nord voted to not authorize issuance of the
Complaint.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4. Complaint Counsel is the staff of
the Division of Compliance within the
Office of the General Counsel of the
Commission (‘‘Complaint Counsel’’).
The Commission is an independent
federal regulatory agency established
pursuant to Section 4 of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2053.
5. Upon information and belief, Zen is
a Colorado corporation with its
principal place of business located at
4155 E. Jewell Avenue, Suite 908,
Denver, Colorado 80222.
6. Respondent is an importer and
distributor of the Subject Products
known as Zen MagnetsTM.
7. As importer and distributor of the
Subject Products, Respondent is a
‘‘manufacturer’’ and ‘‘distributor’’ of a
‘‘consumer product’’ that is ‘‘distributed
in commerce,’’ as those terms are
defined in CPSA sections 3(a)(5), (7),
(8), and (11) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2052(a)(5), (7), (8), and (11).
The Consumer Product
8. The Subject Products are imported
and distributed in U.S. commerce and
offered for sale to consumers for their
personal use in or around a permanent
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
47824
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
or temporary household or residence, a
school, and in recreation or otherwise.
The Subject Products consist of small,
individual magnets that are packaged as
aggregated masses in containers of
varying size. These containers hold
anywhere from 72 to 1,728 small
magnets. Each magnet ranges in size
from approximately 5.03 mm, with a
chrome coating, and a flux index of over
50.
9. Upon information and belief, the
flux index of the Subject Products
ranges from 577.1 to 581.4 kg2mm.2
10. Upon information and belief,
Respondent introduced the Subject
Products into U.S. commerce in July
2009.
11. Upon information and belief, the
Subject Products are currently
manufactured by Bestway Magnet Corp.
No. 225, Northern Section of Huancheng
Westroad, Ningbo, China.
12. Upon information and belief,
Respondent advertised and marketed
the product in 2009 and 2010 as ‘‘fun to
play with’’ strong rare-earth magnets
that ‘‘look good on cute people’’ and can
act as stress relief and a way to relieve
boredom.
13. Upon information and belief, in
2011 Respondent began advertising and
marketing the product as a ‘‘magnetic
science kit’’ in addition to the uses
listed above.
14. Upon information and belief, the
Subject Products are sold in a velvet
sack, or an MDF hard case for the sets
of 72 and 216 magnets. The larger set of
1,728 magnets is packaged in a velvetlined wooden teak box. The sets range
in retail price from approximately
$12.65 to over $250.00 for the largest
set.
15. Upon information and belief, more
than 57,000 of the Subject Products
have been sold to consumers in the
United States.
The Subject Products Create a
Substantial Risk of Injury to the Public
16. The Subject Products pose a risk
of magnet ingestion by children under
the age of 14, who, consistent with
developmentally appropriate behavior,
may place single or numerous magnet
balls in their mouths. The risk of
ingestion also exists when adolescents
use the product to mimic piercings of
the lip, tongue, and cheek and
accidentally swallow the balls.
17. If two or more of the magnets are
ingested and their magnetic forces pull
them together, the magnets can pinch or
trap the intestinal walls or other
digestive tissue between them resulting
in acute and long-term health
consequences. Magnets that attract
through the walls of the intestines result
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 Aug 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
in progressive tissue injury, beginning
with local inflammation and ulceration,
progressing to tissue death, then
perforation or fistula formation. Such
conditions can lead to infection, sepsis,
and death. Ingestion of more than one
magnet often requires medical
intervention, including endoscopic or
surgical procedures. However, because
the initial symptoms of injury from
magnet ingestion are nonspecific and
may include nausea, vomiting, and
abdominal pain, caretakers, parents, and
medical professionals may easily
mistake these nonspecific symptoms for
other common gastrointestinal upsets,
and erroneously believe that medical
treatment is not immediately required.
18. Medical professionals may not be
aware of the dangers posed by ingestion
of the Subject Products and the
corresponding need for immediate
evaluation and monitoring. A delay of
surgical intervention due to the patient’s
presentation with nonspecific
symptoms and/or a lack of awareness by
medical personnel of the dangers posed
by multiple magnet ingestion can
exacerbate life-threatening internal
injuries.
19. Magnets that become affixed
through the gastrointestinal walls and
are not surgically removed may result in
intestinal perforations that can lead to
necrosis, the formation of fistulas, or
ultimately, perforation of the bowel and
leakage of toxic bowel contents into the
abdominal cavity. These conditions can
lead to serious injury and possibly even
death.
20. Endoscopic and surgical
procedures may also be complicated in
cases of multiple magnet ingestion due
to the attraction of the magnet balls to
the metal equipment used to retrieve the
magnets.
21. Children who undergo surgery to
remove multiple magnets from their
gastrointestinal tract face long-term
health consequences, including
intestinal scarring, nutritional
deficiencies due to loss of portions of
the bowel, and possible fertility issues
for women.
Count I
The Subject Products’ Warnings and
Labeling Are Defective as They Do Not
Effectively Communicate the Hazards
Associated With the Ingestion of the
Subject Product
22. Paragraphs 1 through 21 are
hereby realleged and incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth
herein.
23. Upon information and belief,
many children have ingested products
(the ‘‘Ingested Products’’) that are
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
almost identical in form, substance, and
content to Zen MagnetTM products.
24. Upon information and belief, the
Ingested Products are marketed in
substantially similar ways as Zen
MagnetTM products.
25. Upon information and belief, the
Ingested Products are used in
substantially similar ways to Zen
MagnetTM products.
26. Upon information and belief,
some models of the Subject Products are
sold in packaging that contain the
following warning on a small slip of
paper:
Warning: DO NOT SWALLOW MAGNETS.
How old do you have to be to play with
these? Dunno. 14 years old in the U.S. for a
strong magnetic toy, unless it’s not a toy,
then no age limit, but they’re fun magnets
spheres, aren’t they a toy? Unless it’s a
‘‘science kit’’ then the government age
recommendation is 8+. But really, it’s
whatever age at which a person stops
swallowing non-foods.
27. The packaging also states:
Strong magnets can cause fatal intestinal
pinching. Place swallowing magnets on your
don’t do list along with breathing water,
drinking poison, and running into traffic.
Call poison control if more than one is
swallowed. And keep these away from kids
(and pets) who don’t understand these
dangers. BTW, this is a ‘‘science kit’’ for sure.
28. On October 11, 2011, staff notified
Respondent that Zen MagnetsTM failed
to comply with ASTM Standard F963–
08, which required that such products
be marketed to children 14+.
29. On November 10, 2011, the
Commission issued a public safety alert
warning the public of the dangers of the
ingestion of rare earth magnets.
30. Upon information and belief,
Respondent only recently changed its
product’s marketing to comply with
ASTM Standard F963–08. Its Web site
now states that ‘‘CPSC recommends
minimum age of 14’’ and ‘‘U.S.
Government age recommendation is 14
years.’’
31. Despite the Commission safety
alert and enhanced warnings on the
Subject Products and the Ingested
Products, ingestions of Ingested
Products continue to occur.
32. Warnings are ineffective for the
Subject Products because parents and
caregivers do not realize the hazards
associated with the Subject Products of
magnet ingestion, and as a result, they
will continue to allow children to have
access to the Subject Products. Children
cannot, and do not, recognize the hazard
either, and as a result, they will
continue to mouth the items, swallow
them, or in the case of young
adolescents and teens, mimic body
piercings.
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2012 / Notices
33. Warnings are ineffective for the
Subject Products because once the
Subject Product is removed from its
packaging, the individual magnets
display no warning against ingestion or
aspiration, and the small size of the
individual magnets precludes the
addition of such a warning.
34. Warnings are ineffective because
individual magnets are easily shared
among children so that many end users
of the product are likely to have had no
exposure to any warning.
35. The Subject Products are defective
because their packaging and warning
labels cannot guard against the
foreseeable misuse of the product and
prevent the substantial risk of injury to
children.
36. Therefore, the Subject Products
are defective pursuant to sections
15(a)(2) of the CPSC, 15 U.S.C.
2064(a)(2).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Count II
The Subject Products, as Designed, Are
Defective and Pose a Substantial Risk of
Injury
37. Paragraphs 1 through 36 are
hereby realleged and incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth
herein.
38. The Subject Products are defective
because they do not operate exclusively
as intended, and thus, they present a
substantial risk of injury to the public.
Although the Subject Products warn
against placing the magnets in the
mouth, misuse is foreseeable
nonetheless.
39. The Subject Products present a
substantial risk of injury to children
because the individual magnets are
intensely appealing to children due to
the tactile features, small size, and
highly reflective, shiny metallic coatings
of the magnets.
40. The Subject Products are also
appealing to children because the
individual magnets are smooth, unique,
and make a soft snapping sound as they
are manipulated.
41. The Subject Products also move in
unexpected, incongruous ways as the
poles on the magnets move to align
properly, which may evoke a degree of
awe and amusement among children.
42. The Subject Products also have
the unique capability of adhering to one
another through body tissue, enabling
adolescents to use the magnets to mimic
body piercings. This can be appealing to
adolescents who are experimenting with
what they, and their caregivers, might
erroneously believe to be safer risktaking than getting an actual body
piercing.
43. The Subject Products present a
substantial risk of injury to children
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 Aug 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
because they do not act solely as adult
products or manipulatives.
44. The Subject Products present a
substantial risk of injury to children
because they are marketed to appeal to
both children and adults.
45. The Subject Products are marketed
as ‘‘fun to play with’’ products that
‘‘look good on cute people.’’
46. The Subject Products are marketed
and intended to be used as a ‘‘science
kit’’ that ‘‘commemorate the natural
rhythm of geometric shapes, and rouse
the dreams of inspired imaginations.’’
47. The packaging of the Subject
Products also constitutes a design
defect. The velvet bags and assorted
boxes that are designed to hold the
Subject Products do not prevent
children from accessing the magnets;
nor do they prevent individual magnets
from detaching from the product and
getting lost. In addition, the packaging
of the Subject Product does not allow
parents and caregivers to know readily
whether a magnet is missing, and is
potentially within the reach of a young
child, who could get a hold of it and
may mouth or ingest the product.
48. The hazard posed by the Subject
Products cannot be remedied by
different packaging because users are
unlikely to return the magnets to any
container or case to store them,
regardless of the packaging design.
Users of the Subject Products are
unlikely to disassemble magnet
configurations, many of which are
elaborate and time-consuming to create,
and replace them in a case or container
after each use. This is more likely with
the subject product which comes with a
steel plate upon which designs can be
affixed and will likely be displayed.
Count III
The Subject Products Are a Substantial
Product Hazard
49. Paragraphs 1 through 48 are
hereby realleged and incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth
herein.
50. The Subject Products present a
substantial risk of injury because the
pattern of defect—failure to operate
exclusively as an adult toy, failure to
communicate warnings effectively, and
marketing the product for uses
applicable to children under the age of
14—is present in all of the Subject
Products.
51. Therefore, the Subject Products
present a substantial product hazard
within the meaning of Section 15(a)(2)
of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. § 2064(a)(2), by
reasons of the substantial risk of injury
or death alleged in paragraphs 1 through
48 above.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47825
52. The Respondent has refused to
stop sale and conduct a recall of the
Subject Products voluntarily.
Relief Sought
Wherefore, in the public interest,
Complaint Counsel requests that the
Commission:
A. Determine that Respondents’
Subject Products, known as Zen
MagnetsTM, present a ‘‘substantial
product hazard’’ within the meaning of
Section 15 U.S.C. § 2064(a)(2).
B. Determine that extensive and
effective public notification under
Section 15(c) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2064(c), is required to protect children
adequately from the risks of injury
presented by rare earth magnet
products, and order Respondent under
Section 15(c) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2064(c) to:
(1) Cease importation and distribution
of the Subject Products;
(2) Notify all persons and entities that
transport, store, distribute, or otherwise
handle the Subject Products, or to
whom such product has been
transported, sold, distributed, or
otherwise handled, to cease distribution
of the product immediately;
(3) Notify appropriate state and local
public health officials;
(4) Give prompt public notice of the
defect in the Subject Products,
including the incidents and injuries
associated with ingestion or aspiration,
including posting clear and conspicuous
notice on its Internet Web site,
providing notice to any third party
Internet Web site on which Respondent
has placed the product for sale, and
announcements in languages other than
English and on radio and television
where the Commission determines that
a substantial number of consumers to
whom the recall is directed may not be
reached by other notice;
(5) Mail notice to each distributor or
retailer of the Subject Products; and
(6) Mail notice to every individual to
whom the person required to give notice
knows such product was delivered or
sold.
C. Determine that action under
Section 15(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2064(d), is in the public interest, and
additionally, order Respondent to:
(1) Refund consumers the purchase
price of the Subject Products;
(2) Make no charge to consumers and
to reimburse consumers for any
reasonable and foreseeable expenses
incurred in availing themselves of any
remedy provided under any
Commission Order issued in this matter,
as provided by Section 15 U.S.C.
2064(e)(1);
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
47826
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(3) Reimburse retailers for expenses in
connection with carrying out any
Commission Order issued in this matter,
including the costs of returns, refunds,
and/or replacements, as provided by
Section 15 U.S.C. 2064(e)(2);
(4) Submit a plan satisfactory to the
Commission, within ten (10) days of
service of the Final Order, directing that
actions specified in Paragraphs B(1)
through (5) and C(1) through (3) above
be taken in a timely manner;
(5) To submit monthly reports, in a
format satisfactory to the Commission,
documenting the progress of the
corrective action program;
(6) For a period of five (5) years after
issuance of the Final Order in this
matter, to keep records of its actions
taken to comply with Paragraphs B(1)
through (5) and C(1) through (4) above,
and supply these records to the
Commission for the purpose of
monitoring compliance with the Final
Order;
(7) For a period of five (5) years after
issuance of the Final Order in this
matter, to notify the Commission at least
sixty (60) days prior to any change in its
business (such as incorporation,
dissolution, assignment, sale, or petition
for bankruptcy) that results in, or is
intended to result in, the emergence of
a successor corporation, going out of
business, or any other change that might
affect compliance obligations under a
Final Order issued by the Commission
in this matter; and
D. Order that Respondent shall take
other and further actions as the
Commission deems necessary to protect
the public health and safety and to
comply with the CPSA.
ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE
COMMISSION:
Dated this 6th day of August 2012.
lllllllllllllllllllll
By: Kenneth Hinson,
Executive Director, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD 20814,
Tel: (301) 504–7854.
Mary Murphy,
Assistant General Counsel, Division of
Compliance, Office of General Counsel, U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Bethesda, MD 20814, Tel: (301) 504–7809.
Jennifer Argabright,
Trial Attorney.
Sarah Wang,
Trial Attorney, Complaint Counsel, Division
of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Bethesda, MD 20814, Tel: (301) 504–7808.
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on August 6th,
2012, I served the foregoing Complaint
upon all parties of record in these
proceedings by mailing, certified mail,
postage prepaid, a copy to each at their
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 Aug 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
principal place of business, and
emailing a courtesy copy, as follows:
Shihan Qu, Founder, Zen Magnets, LLC,
4155 E. Jewell Avenue, Suite 908,
Denver, CO 80222,
shihanqu@gmail.com.
llllllllllllllllll
l
Complaint Counsel for U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012–19693 Filed 8–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS
ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 77 No. 152,
Tuesday, August 7, 2012, page 47047.
ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF OPEN
MEETING: 3:30 p.m.–5:30 p.m., Thursday,
Register (Volume 77, Number 116, Page
35961) with a wait period that ended on
July 15 2012. The ROD documents only
the decision of the Air Force with
respect to the proposed Air Force
actions analyzed in the FEIS. Authority:
This NOA is published pursuant to the
regulations (40 CFR Part 1506.6)
implementing the provisions of the
NEPA of 1969 (42 USC. 4321, et seq.)
and the Air Force’s Environmental
Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) (32 CFR
Parts 989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7)).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Kim Fornof, 266 F Street West, Building
901, Randolph AFB, 78150–4319, (210)
652–1961, aetc.a7cp.inbox@us.af.mil.
Henry Williams Jr.,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–19674 Filed 8–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
August 9, 2012.
CHANGES TO OPEN MEETING: REVISED TIME:
Time changed to 3 p.m.–5 p.m.,
Thursday, August 9, 2012.
For a recorded message containing the
latest agenda information, call (301)
504–7948.
CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson,
Office
of the Secretary, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301)
504–7923.
Dated: August 8, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–19786 Filed 8–8–12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Record of Decision for F35A Training
Basing Final Environmental Impact
Statement
Notice of Availability (NOA) of
a Record of Decision (ROD).
ACTION:
On August 1, 2012, the
United States Air Force signed the ROD
for the F35A Training Basing Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
The ROD states the Air Force decision
to implement the Preffered Alternative
to beddown 72 F35A Primary aircraft
authorized (PAA) training aircraft at
Luke Air Force Base, Arizona.
The decision was based on matters
discussed in the FEIS, inputs from the
public and regulatory agencies, and
other relevant factors. The FEIS was
made available to the public on June 15,
2012 through a NOA in the Federal
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Inland Waterways Users Board;
Request for Nominations
Department of the Army, DOD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Section 302 of Public Law 99–
662 established the Inland Waterways
Users Board. The Board is an
independent Federal advisory
committee. The Secretary of the Army
appoints its 11 (eleven) representative
organizations. This notice is to solicit
nominations for 11 appointments to
two-year terms that will begin after
February 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Institute for Water
Resources, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Attention: Inland Waterways
Users Board Nominations Committee,
Mr. Mark R. Pointon, 7701 Telegraph
Road, Casey Building, Alexandria,
Virginia 22315–3868.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Mr. Mark R.
Pointon, (703) 428–6438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
selection, service, and appointment of
representative organizations to the
Board are covered by provisions of
Section 302 of Public Law 99–662. The
substance of those provisions is as
follows:
a. Selection. Representative
organizations are to be selected from the
spectrum of commercial carriers and
shippers using the inland and
intracoastal waterways, to represent
geographical regions, and to be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47823-47826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19693]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 12-2]
Zen Magnets, LLC; Complaint
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Publication of a Complaint under the Consumer Product Safety
Act.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under provisions of its Rules of Practice for Adjudicative
Proceeding (16 CFR part 1025), the Consumer Product Safety Commission
must publish in the Federal Register Complaints which it issues.
Published below is a Complaint: In the Matter of Zen Magnets, LLC.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Commission voted 3-1 to authorize issuance of this
Complaint. Chairman Inez M. Tenenbaum, Commissioner Anne M. Northup
and Commissioner Robert S. Adler voted to authorize issuance of the
Complaint. Commissioner Nancy A. Nord voted to not authorize
issuance of the Complaint.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Complaint appears below.
Dated: August 7, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
United States of America
Consumer Product Safety Commission
CPSC Docket No. 12-2.
In the Matter of Zen Magnets, LLC, Respondent.
Complaint
Nature of Proceedings
1. This is an administrative enforcement proceeding pursuant to
Section 15 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (``CPSA''), as amended,
15 U.S.C. 2064, for public notification and remedial action to protect
the public from the substantial risks of injury presented by aggregated
masses of high-powered, small rare earth magnets known as Zen
MagnetsTM Rare Earth Magnetic Balls, imported and
distributed by Zen Magnets, LLC (``Zen'' or ``Respondent'').
2. This proceeding is governed by the Rules of Practice for
Adjudicative Proceedings before the Consumer Product Safety Commission
(``Commission''), 16 CFR Part 1025.
Jurisdiction
3. This proceeding is instituted pursuant to the authority
contained in Sections 15(c), (d), and (f) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2064(c), (d), and (f).
Parties
4. Complaint Counsel is the staff of the Division of Compliance
within the Office of the General Counsel of the Commission (``Complaint
Counsel''). The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency
established pursuant to Section 4 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2053.
5. Upon information and belief, Zen is a Colorado corporation with
its principal place of business located at 4155 E. Jewell Avenue, Suite
908, Denver, Colorado 80222.
6. Respondent is an importer and distributor of the Subject
Products known as Zen MagnetsTM.
7. As importer and distributor of the Subject Products, Respondent
is a ``manufacturer'' and ``distributor'' of a ``consumer product''
that is ``distributed in commerce,'' as those terms are defined in CPSA
sections 3(a)(5), (7), (8), and (11) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5),
(7), (8), and (11).
The Consumer Product
8. The Subject Products are imported and distributed in U.S.
commerce and offered for sale to consumers for their personal use in or
around a permanent
[[Page 47824]]
or temporary household or residence, a school, and in recreation or
otherwise. The Subject Products consist of small, individual magnets
that are packaged as aggregated masses in containers of varying size.
These containers hold anywhere from 72 to 1,728 small magnets. Each
magnet ranges in size from approximately 5.03 mm, with a chrome
coating, and a flux index of over 50.
9. Upon information and belief, the flux index of the Subject
Products ranges from 577.1 to 581.4 kg\2\mm.\2\
10. Upon information and belief, Respondent introduced the Subject
Products into U.S. commerce in July 2009.
11. Upon information and belief, the Subject Products are currently
manufactured by Bestway Magnet Corp. No. 225, Northern Section of
Huancheng Westroad, Ningbo, China.
12. Upon information and belief, Respondent advertised and marketed
the product in 2009 and 2010 as ``fun to play with'' strong rare-earth
magnets that ``look good on cute people'' and can act as stress relief
and a way to relieve boredom.
13. Upon information and belief, in 2011 Respondent began
advertising and marketing the product as a ``magnetic science kit'' in
addition to the uses listed above.
14. Upon information and belief, the Subject Products are sold in a
velvet sack, or an MDF hard case for the sets of 72 and 216 magnets.
The larger set of 1,728 magnets is packaged in a velvet-lined wooden
teak box. The sets range in retail price from approximately $12.65 to
over $250.00 for the largest set.
15. Upon information and belief, more than 57,000 of the Subject
Products have been sold to consumers in the United States.
The Subject Products Create a Substantial Risk of Injury to the Public
16. The Subject Products pose a risk of magnet ingestion by
children under the age of 14, who, consistent with developmentally
appropriate behavior, may place single or numerous magnet balls in
their mouths. The risk of ingestion also exists when adolescents use
the product to mimic piercings of the lip, tongue, and cheek and
accidentally swallow the balls.
17. If two or more of the magnets are ingested and their magnetic
forces pull them together, the magnets can pinch or trap the intestinal
walls or other digestive tissue between them resulting in acute and
long-term health consequences. Magnets that attract through the walls
of the intestines result in progressive tissue injury, beginning with
local inflammation and ulceration, progressing to tissue death, then
perforation or fistula formation. Such conditions can lead to
infection, sepsis, and death. Ingestion of more than one magnet often
requires medical intervention, including endoscopic or surgical
procedures. However, because the initial symptoms of injury from magnet
ingestion are nonspecific and may include nausea, vomiting, and
abdominal pain, caretakers, parents, and medical professionals may
easily mistake these nonspecific symptoms for other common
gastrointestinal upsets, and erroneously believe that medical treatment
is not immediately required.
18. Medical professionals may not be aware of the dangers posed by
ingestion of the Subject Products and the corresponding need for
immediate evaluation and monitoring. A delay of surgical intervention
due to the patient's presentation with nonspecific symptoms and/or a
lack of awareness by medical personnel of the dangers posed by multiple
magnet ingestion can exacerbate life-threatening internal injuries.
19. Magnets that become affixed through the gastrointestinal walls
and are not surgically removed may result in intestinal perforations
that can lead to necrosis, the formation of fistulas, or ultimately,
perforation of the bowel and leakage of toxic bowel contents into the
abdominal cavity. These conditions can lead to serious injury and
possibly even death.
20. Endoscopic and surgical procedures may also be complicated in
cases of multiple magnet ingestion due to the attraction of the magnet
balls to the metal equipment used to retrieve the magnets.
21. Children who undergo surgery to remove multiple magnets from
their gastrointestinal tract face long-term health consequences,
including intestinal scarring, nutritional deficiencies due to loss of
portions of the bowel, and possible fertility issues for women.
Count I
The Subject Products' Warnings and Labeling Are Defective as They Do
Not Effectively Communicate the Hazards Associated With the Ingestion
of the Subject Product
22. Paragraphs 1 through 21 are hereby realleged and incorporated
by reference as though fully set forth herein.
23. Upon information and belief, many children have ingested
products (the ``Ingested Products'') that are almost identical in form,
substance, and content to Zen MagnetTM products.
24. Upon information and belief, the Ingested Products are marketed
in substantially similar ways as Zen MagnetTM products.
25. Upon information and belief, the Ingested Products are used in
substantially similar ways to Zen MagnetTM products.
26. Upon information and belief, some models of the Subject
Products are sold in packaging that contain the following warning on a
small slip of paper:
Warning: DO NOT SWALLOW MAGNETS. How old do you have to be to
play with these? Dunno. 14 years old in the U.S. for a strong
magnetic toy, unless it's not a toy, then no age limit, but they're
fun magnets spheres, aren't they a toy? Unless it's a ``science
kit'' then the government age recommendation is 8+. But really, it's
whatever age at which a person stops swallowing non-foods.
27. The packaging also states:
Strong magnets can cause fatal intestinal pinching. Place
swallowing magnets on your don't do list along with breathing water,
drinking poison, and running into traffic. Call poison control if
more than one is swallowed. And keep these away from kids (and pets)
who don't understand these dangers. BTW, this is a ``science kit''
for sure.
28. On October 11, 2011, staff notified Respondent that Zen
MagnetsTM failed to comply with ASTM Standard F963-08, which
required that such products be marketed to children 14+.
29. On November 10, 2011, the Commission issued a public safety
alert warning the public of the dangers of the ingestion of rare earth
magnets.
30. Upon information and belief, Respondent only recently changed
its product's marketing to comply with ASTM Standard F963-08. Its Web
site now states that ``CPSC recommends minimum age of 14'' and ``U.S.
Government age recommendation is 14 years.''
31. Despite the Commission safety alert and enhanced warnings on
the Subject Products and the Ingested Products, ingestions of Ingested
Products continue to occur.
32. Warnings are ineffective for the Subject Products because
parents and caregivers do not realize the hazards associated with the
Subject Products of magnet ingestion, and as a result, they will
continue to allow children to have access to the Subject Products.
Children cannot, and do not, recognize the hazard either, and as a
result, they will continue to mouth the items, swallow them, or in the
case of young adolescents and teens, mimic body piercings.
[[Page 47825]]
33. Warnings are ineffective for the Subject Products because once
the Subject Product is removed from its packaging, the individual
magnets display no warning against ingestion or aspiration, and the
small size of the individual magnets precludes the addition of such a
warning.
34. Warnings are ineffective because individual magnets are easily
shared among children so that many end users of the product are likely
to have had no exposure to any warning.
35. The Subject Products are defective because their packaging and
warning labels cannot guard against the foreseeable misuse of the
product and prevent the substantial risk of injury to children.
36. Therefore, the Subject Products are defective pursuant to
sections 15(a)(2) of the CPSC, 15 U.S.C. 2064(a)(2).
Count II
The Subject Products, as Designed, Are Defective and Pose a Substantial
Risk of Injury
37. Paragraphs 1 through 36 are hereby realleged and incorporated
by reference as though fully set forth herein.
38. The Subject Products are defective because they do not operate
exclusively as intended, and thus, they present a substantial risk of
injury to the public. Although the Subject Products warn against
placing the magnets in the mouth, misuse is foreseeable nonetheless.
39. The Subject Products present a substantial risk of injury to
children because the individual magnets are intensely appealing to
children due to the tactile features, small size, and highly
reflective, shiny metallic coatings of the magnets.
40. The Subject Products are also appealing to children because the
individual magnets are smooth, unique, and make a soft snapping sound
as they are manipulated.
41. The Subject Products also move in unexpected, incongruous ways
as the poles on the magnets move to align properly, which may evoke a
degree of awe and amusement among children.
42. The Subject Products also have the unique capability of
adhering to one another through body tissue, enabling adolescents to
use the magnets to mimic body piercings. This can be appealing to
adolescents who are experimenting with what they, and their caregivers,
might erroneously believe to be safer risk-taking than getting an
actual body piercing.
43. The Subject Products present a substantial risk of injury to
children because they do not act solely as adult products or
manipulatives.
44. The Subject Products present a substantial risk of injury to
children because they are marketed to appeal to both children and
adults.
45. The Subject Products are marketed as ``fun to play with''
products that ``look good on cute people.''
46. The Subject Products are marketed and intended to be used as a
``science kit'' that ``commemorate the natural rhythm of geometric
shapes, and rouse the dreams of inspired imaginations.''
47. The packaging of the Subject Products also constitutes a design
defect. The velvet bags and assorted boxes that are designed to hold
the Subject Products do not prevent children from accessing the
magnets; nor do they prevent individual magnets from detaching from the
product and getting lost. In addition, the packaging of the Subject
Product does not allow parents and caregivers to know readily whether a
magnet is missing, and is potentially within the reach of a young
child, who could get a hold of it and may mouth or ingest the product.
48. The hazard posed by the Subject Products cannot be remedied by
different packaging because users are unlikely to return the magnets to
any container or case to store them, regardless of the packaging
design. Users of the Subject Products are unlikely to disassemble
magnet configurations, many of which are elaborate and time-consuming
to create, and replace them in a case or container after each use. This
is more likely with the subject product which comes with a steel plate
upon which designs can be affixed and will likely be displayed.
Count III
The Subject Products Are a Substantial Product Hazard
49. Paragraphs 1 through 48 are hereby realleged and incorporated
by reference as though fully set forth herein.
50. The Subject Products present a substantial risk of injury
because the pattern of defect--failure to operate exclusively as an
adult toy, failure to communicate warnings effectively, and marketing
the product for uses applicable to children under the age of 14--is
present in all of the Subject Products.
51. Therefore, the Subject Products present a substantial product
hazard within the meaning of Section 15(a)(2) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
Sec. 2064(a)(2), by reasons of the substantial risk of injury or death
alleged in paragraphs 1 through 48 above.
52. The Respondent has refused to stop sale and conduct a recall of
the Subject Products voluntarily.
Relief Sought
Wherefore, in the public interest, Complaint Counsel requests that
the Commission:
A. Determine that Respondents' Subject Products, known as Zen
MagnetsTM, present a ``substantial product hazard'' within
the meaning of Section 15 U.S.C. Sec. 2064(a)(2).
B. Determine that extensive and effective public notification under
Section 15(c) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(c), is required to protect
children adequately from the risks of injury presented by rare earth
magnet products, and order Respondent under Section 15(c) of the CPSA,
15 U.S.C. 2064(c) to:
(1) Cease importation and distribution of the Subject Products;
(2) Notify all persons and entities that transport, store,
distribute, or otherwise handle the Subject Products, or to whom such
product has been transported, sold, distributed, or otherwise handled,
to cease distribution of the product immediately;
(3) Notify appropriate state and local public health officials;
(4) Give prompt public notice of the defect in the Subject
Products, including the incidents and injuries associated with
ingestion or aspiration, including posting clear and conspicuous notice
on its Internet Web site, providing notice to any third party Internet
Web site on which Respondent has placed the product for sale, and
announcements in languages other than English and on radio and
television where the Commission determines that a substantial number of
consumers to whom the recall is directed may not be reached by other
notice;
(5) Mail notice to each distributor or retailer of the Subject
Products; and
(6) Mail notice to every individual to whom the person required to
give notice knows such product was delivered or sold.
C. Determine that action under Section 15(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2064(d), is in the public interest, and additionally, order Respondent
to:
(1) Refund consumers the purchase price of the Subject Products;
(2) Make no charge to consumers and to reimburse consumers for any
reasonable and foreseeable expenses incurred in availing themselves of
any remedy provided under any Commission Order issued in this matter,
as provided by Section 15 U.S.C. 2064(e)(1);
[[Page 47826]]
(3) Reimburse retailers for expenses in connection with carrying
out any Commission Order issued in this matter, including the costs of
returns, refunds, and/or replacements, as provided by Section 15 U.S.C.
2064(e)(2);
(4) Submit a plan satisfactory to the Commission, within ten (10)
days of service of the Final Order, directing that actions specified in
Paragraphs B(1) through (5) and C(1) through (3) above be taken in a
timely manner;
(5) To submit monthly reports, in a format satisfactory to the
Commission, documenting the progress of the corrective action program;
(6) For a period of five (5) years after issuance of the Final
Order in this matter, to keep records of its actions taken to comply
with Paragraphs B(1) through (5) and C(1) through (4) above, and supply
these records to the Commission for the purpose of monitoring
compliance with the Final Order;
(7) For a period of five (5) years after issuance of the Final
Order in this matter, to notify the Commission at least sixty (60) days
prior to any change in its business (such as incorporation,
dissolution, assignment, sale, or petition for bankruptcy) that results
in, or is intended to result in, the emergence of a successor
corporation, going out of business, or any other change that might
affect compliance obligations under a Final Order issued by the
Commission in this matter; and
D. Order that Respondent shall take other and further actions as
the Commission deems necessary to protect the public health and safety
and to comply with the CPSA.
ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION:
Dated this 6th day of August 2012.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
By: Kenneth Hinson,
Executive Director, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Bethesda, MD 20814, Tel: (301) 504-7854.
Mary Murphy,
Assistant General Counsel, Division of Compliance, Office of General
Counsel, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD
20814, Tel: (301) 504-7809.
Jennifer Argabright,
Trial Attorney.
Sarah Wang,
Trial Attorney, Complaint Counsel, Division of Compliance, Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Bethesda, MD 20814, Tel: (301) 504-7808.
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on August 6th, 2012, I served the foregoing
Complaint upon all parties of record in these proceedings by mailing,
certified mail, postage prepaid, a copy to each at their principal
place of business, and emailing a courtesy copy, as follows:
Shihan Qu, Founder, Zen Magnets, LLC, 4155 E. Jewell Avenue, Suite 908,
Denver, CO 80222, shihanqu@gmail.com.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Complaint Counsel for U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-19693 Filed 8-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P