National Environmental Policy Act: Implementing Procedures; Addition to Categorical Exclusions for Bureau of Indian Affairs, 47862-47864 [2012-19648]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
47862
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2012 / Notices
Federal property. This Notice is also
published in order to comply with the
December 12, 1988 Court Order in
National Coalition for the Homeless v.
Veterans Administration, No. 88–2503–
OG (D.D.C.).
Properties reviewed are listed in this
Notice according to the following
categories: Suitable/available, suitable/
unavailable, suitable/to be excess, and
unsuitable. The properties listed in the
three suitable categories have been
reviewed by the landholding agencies,
and each agency has transmitted to
HUD: (1) Its intention to make the
property available for use to assist the
homeless, (2) its intention to declare the
property excess to the agency’s needs, or
(3) a statement of the reasons that the
property cannot be declared excess or
made available for use as facilities to
assist the homeless.
Properties listed as suitable/available
will be available exclusively for
homeless use for a period of 60 days
from the date of this Notice. Where
property is described as for ‘‘off-site use
only’’ recipients of the property will be
required to relocate the building to their
own site at their own expense.
Homeless assistance providers
interested in any such property should
send a written expression of interest to
HHS, addressed to Theresa Ritta,
Division of Property Management,
Program Support Center, HHS, room
5B–17, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville,
MD 20857; (301) 443–2265. (This is not
a toll-free number.) HHS will mail to the
interested provider an application
packet, which will include instructions
for completing the application. In order
to maximize the opportunity to utilize a
suitable property, providers should
submit their written expressions of
interest as soon as possible. For
complete details concerning the
processing of applications, the reader is
encouraged to refer to the interim rule
governing this program, 24 CFR part
581.
For properties listed as suitable/to be
excess, that property may, if
subsequently accepted as excess by
GSA, be made available for use by the
homeless in accordance with applicable
law, subject to screening for other
Federal use. At the appropriate time,
HUD will publish the property in a
Notice showing it as either suitable/
available or suitable/unavailable.
For properties listed as suitable/
unavailable, the landholding agency has
decided that the property cannot be
declared excess or made available for
use to assist the homeless, and the
property will not be available.
Properties listed as unsuitable will
not be made available for any other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 Aug 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
purpose for 20 days from the date of this
Notice. Homeless assistance providers
interested in a review by HUD of the
determination of unsuitability should
call the toll free information line at 1–
800–927–7588 for detailed instructions
or write a letter to Ann Marie Oliva at
the address listed at the beginning of
this Notice. Included in the request for
review should be the property address
(including zip code), the date of
publication in the Federal Register, the
landholding agency, and the property
number.
For more information regarding
particular properties identified in this
Notice (i.e., acreage, floor plan, existing
sanitary facilities, exact street address),
providers should contact the
appropriate landholding agencies at the
following addresses: COE: Mr. Scott
Whiteford, Army Corps of Engineers,
Real Estate, CEMP–CR, 441 G Street
NW., Washington, DC 20314; (202) 761–
5542; GSA: Mr. Flavio Peres, General
Services Administration, Office of Real
Property Utilization and Disposal, 1800
F Street NW., Room 7040 Washington,
DC 20405, (202) 501–0084; NAVY: Mr.
Steve Matteo, Department of the Navy,
Asset Management Division, Naval
Facilities Engineering Command,
Washington Navy Yard, 1330 Patterson
Ave. SW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC
20374; (202) 685–9426; (These are not
toll-free numbers).
Dated: August 2, 2012.
Ann Marie Oliva,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs
(Acting).
Landholding Agency: Navy
Property Number: 77201230007
Status: Excess
Directions: 10636, 10852, 10972, 12150,
12152, 13061, 16081, 16098
Comments: Located w/in secured
boundary of military reservation; no
public access & no alternative method
to gain access w/out comprising nat’l
security
Reasons: Secured Area
Ohio
Washington County Memorial
U.S. Army Reserve Center
Marietta OH 45750
Landholding Agency: GSA
Property Number: 54201230005
Status: Excess
GSA Number: 1–D–OH–846
Comments: Triad Hunter Co. located
within 2,000 ft. of property; company
is in the oil and gas exploration
business; 300–500 gal above ground
tanks on co. grounds contain diesel
fuel for their off road vehicles
Reasons: Within 2000 ft. of flammable
or explosive material
Pennsylvania
Building 208
Naval Support Activity
Mechanicsburg PA
Landholding Agency: Navy
Property Number: 77201230008
Status: Excess
Comments: Public access denied & no
alternative method to gain access w/
out comprising nat’l security
Reasons: Secured Area
[FR Doc. 2012–19327 Filed 8–9–12; 8:45 am]
Title V, Federal Surplus Property
Program Federal Register Report for 08/
10/2012
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
Suitable/Available Properties
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Building
Office of the Secretary
Oklahoma
National Environmental Policy Act:
Implementing Procedures; Addition to
Categorical Exclusions for Bureau of
Indian Affairs
5 Buildings
RS Kerr Lake
Sallisaw OK 74955
Landholding Agency: COE
Property Number: 31201230002
Status: Underutilized
Directions: 42863, 42857, 42858, 42859,
42860
Comments: Off-site removal only; 264
sf.; use: vault toilet; excessive
vegetation; severe damage from
vandals
Unsuitable Properties
Building
California
8 Buildings
1 Administration Circle
China Lake CA 93555
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department of the Interior.
Notice of Final National
Environmental Policy Act Implementing
Procedures.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This notice announces the
addition of a new categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) to be included in the
Departmental Manual 516 DM 10. The
proposed categorical exclusion pertains
to the leasing and funding for singlefamily homesites on Indian land,
including associated improvements and
easements, which encompass five acres
or less of contiguous land.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2012 / Notices
Effective Date: The categorical
exclusion is effective August 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: To obtain a copy of the new
categorical exclusion contact Marvin
Keller, NEPA Coordinator—Indian
Affairs, 12220 Sunrise Valley Drive,
Reston, VA 20191, email:
Marv.Keller@bia.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marvin Keller, NEPA Coordinator—
Indian Affairs, (703) 390–6470.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
The need for adequate housing is
critical on most Indian reservations.
Several hundred actions associated with
new home construction are processed
each year and this is expected to
continue at the same level. The Bureau
of Indian Affairs (BIA) has typically
conducted NEPA reviews of actions
associated with single-family homes by
preparing environmental assessments
which resulted in Findings of No
Significant Impact. The addition of a
categorical exclusion to cover the
actions associated with new home
construction will allow for a more
efficient NEPA review.
Because this categorical exclusion has
important implications for actions
occurring daily on Indian lands, the BIA
initiated consultation and requested
comments from all federally recognized
tribes. This consultation period began
on March 7, 2012, and concluded on
May 14, 2012. Public comments were
also solicited through a notice placed in
the Federal Register on May 3, 2012 [77
FR 26314]. The proposed language for
the categorical exclusion as set out in
the notice was as follows: ‘‘Approval of
leases, easements or funds for singlefamily homesites and associated
improvements, including but not
limited to homes, outbuildings, access
roads, and utility lines, which
encompass five (5) acres or less of
contiguous land, provided that such
sites and associated improvements do
not adversely affect any tribal cultural
resources or historic properties and are
in compliance with applicable federal
and tribal laws.’’
Comments on the Proposal
The BIA received responses from 14
tribes and one tribal organization. No
public responses were received. The
responses were in the form of letters and
email messages. All responses
supported the proposed categorical
exclusion; a few suggested minor
changes in the language of the
categorical exclusion.
Comment: One respondent expressed
a concern about neighboring tribes or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 Aug 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
tribal members constructing homes
within their reservation without
complying with the tribe’s laws. The
respondent suggested that the
categorical exclusion should not be
available for non-members or outside
tribes to construct homes on another
tribe’s lands.
Response: The categorical exclusion is
intended to be applicable to all tribes
and tribal members who propose to
construct single-family homes on tribal
land or individually-owned Indian land.
However, the proposed text of the
categorical exclusion includes specific
language that references ‘‘compliance
with federal and tribal laws;’’ therefore,
this categorical exclusion could not be
used for any home construction that
does not comply with tribal law. The
BIA does not propose any additional
changes to the language of the
categorical exclusion in response to this
comment.
Comment: One respondent expressed
concern that because of a decrease in
funds for the BIA Housing Improvement
Program (HIP) the categorical exclusion
would not be effective.
Response: The HIP funding levels are
outside the scope of this proposal.
However, the categorical exclusion is
intended to address all BIA actions
associated with constructing singlefamily homes and includes actions not
associated with HIP funding.
Comment: A respondent suggested
that the categorical exclusion should
include Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) approved housing
activities.
Response: The BIA categorical
exclusion can only apply to BIA actions
and cannot apply to another agency
such as HUD. The proposed BIA
categorical exclusion is intended to be
consistent with HUD’s existing
categorical exclusions, so that the level
of environmental review will be similar.
Comment: A respondent suggested
that since the categorical exclusion is
intended to include new construction
this term should be added to the text.
Response: The BIA agrees, and text of
the categorical exclusion has been
changed to clearly indicate that it
includes new construction as intended.
Comment: A respondent noted that
the BIA Federal Register notice
indicates a single-family homesite may
include one to four dwelling units, but
the number of dwelling units is not
referenced in the text of the categorical
exclusion. It was suggested that the
number of dwelling units should be
referenced, and that, because the key
factors limiting the use of the categorical
exclusion should be the area of land
affected (five acres) and the absence of
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47863
any extraordinary circumstances, it
should not matter whether the limit of
four dwelling units are in a single
building, two duplexes or four detached
units.
Response: The BIA agrees the
categorical exclusion should be clearly
defined as including one to four
dwelling units as intended. The BIA
also believes that the categorical
exclusion should be flexible enough to
include a range of housing options. We
therefore added text to the categorical
exclusion to clarify that home
construction may include up to four
dwelling units, whether in a single
building or up to four separate
buildings. This clarification will also
ensure the categorical exclusion is
consistent with HUD’s existing
categorical exclusion [24 CFR
58.35(a)(4)(i)].
Comment: One respondent asked for
clarification as to who would have
approval authority for the categorical
exclusion: the agency superintendent or
a compacted self-governance tribe.
Response: Because the Federal
government is responsible for
complying with NEPA, the approval
authority for the categorical exclusion is
with the BIA responsible official. Tribes
can prepare the supporting NEPA
documentation, but the approval must
remain with the BIA.
Conclusion
The Department of the Interior and
the BIA find that the action defined in
the categorical exclusion presented at
the end of this notice does not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This finding is based on
the analysis of similar categorical
exclusions used by other Federal
departments and agencies; the
professional judgment of BIA
environmental personnel who had
conducted environmental reviews of
similar actions, which resulted in
Findings of No Significant Impact; and
the post-construction monitoring of
homesites by environmental personnel
that verified no unforeseen effects had
occurred.
Categorical Exclusion
The Department of the Interior will
add the following categorical exclusion
to the Departmental Manual at 516 DM
10.5:
Approvals of leases, easements or funds for
single family homesites and associated
improvements, including, but not limited to,
construction of homes, outbuildings, access
roads, and utility lines, which encompass
five acres or less of contiguous lands,
provided that such sites and associated
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
47864
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 155 / Friday, August 10, 2012 / Notices
improvements do not adversely affect any
tribal cultural resources or historic properties
and are in compliance with applicable
Federal and tribal laws. Home construction
may include up to four dwelling units,
whether in a single building or up to four
separate buildings.
Dated: August 3, 2012.
Willie R. Taylor,
Director, Office of Environmental Policy and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2012–19648 Filed 8–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement
Ocean Energy Safety Advisory
Committee (OESC); Notice of Meeting
Bureau of Safety and
Environmental Enforcement (BSEE),
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
OESC will meet at the
Anchorage Marriott Downtown Hotel in
Anchorage, Alaska.
DATES: Wednesday, August 29, 2012,
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Thursday,
August 30, 2012, from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Anchorage Marriott
Downtown Hotel, 820 West 7th Avenue,
Anchorage, Alaska 99501.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Joseph R. Levine at the Bureau of Safety
and Environmental Enforcement, 381
Elden Street, Herndon, Virginia 20170–
4187. He can be reached by telephone
at (703) 787–1033 or by electronic mail
at joseph.levine@bsee.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OESC
consists of representatives from
industry, Federal Government agencies,
non-governmental organizations, and
the academic community. It provides
policy advice to the Secretary of the
Interior through the Director of BSEE on
matters relating to ocean energy safety,
including, but not limited to drilling
and workplace safety, well intervention
and containment, and oil spill response.
The agenda for Wednesday, August
29, will address the OESC
SUMMARY:
Subcommittees’ activities to date on: oil
spill prevention, spill containment, spill
response and safety management
systems; safety culture; blowout
preventers (BOP); and a proposed Ocean
Energy Safety Institute.
The agenda for Thursday, August 30,
will address interim recommendations
presented to the OESC from its four
subcommittees for consideration and
action, including lessons learned and
next steps forward.
The meeting is open to the public.
Approximately 100 visitors can be
accommodated on a first-come-firstserved basis. Members of the public will
have the opportunity to comment on the
activities of OESC and related topics on
a first-come-first-served basis during the
time allotted for public comment and
may submit written comments to the
OESC during the meeting or by email to
the Committee at OESC@bsee.gov.
Minutes of the Ocean Energy Safety
Advisory Committee meeting will be
available for public inspection on the
Committee’s Web site at: https://
www.bsee.gov/About-BSEE/PublicEngagement/OESC/Index.aspx.
Authority: Federal Advisory Committee
Act, Pub. L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C. Appendix 1,
and the Office of Management and Budget’s
Circular No. A–63, Revised.
Dated: August 1, 2012.
James A. Watson,
Director, Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2012–19600 Filed 8–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
Notice; request for comments.
We (U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service) will ask the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to
approve the information collection (IC)
described below. As required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
as part of our continuing efforts to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, we invite the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on this IC. We
may not conduct or sponsor and a
person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
SUMMARY:
To ensure that we are able to
consider your comments on this IC, we
must receive them October 9, 2012.
DATES:
Send your comments on the
IC to the Service Information Collection
Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, MS 2042–PDM, 4401
North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA
22203 (mail); or INFOCOL@fws.gov
(email). Please include ‘‘1018–WSFR
Application and Performance
Reporting’’ in the subject line of your
comments.
ADDRESSES:
To
request additional information about
this IC, contact Hope Grey at
INFOCOL@fws.gov (email) or 703–358–
2482 (telephone).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R9–WSR–2012–N196;
FVWF941009000007B–XXX–FF09W11000;
FVWF51100900000–XXX–FF09W11000]
Proposed Information Collection;
Application and Performance
Reporting for Wildlife and Sport Fish
Restoration Grants and Cooperative
Agreements
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
I. Abstract
The Wildlife and Sport Fish
Restoration Program (WSFR)
administers the following financial
assistance programs in whole or in part.
We award most financial assistance as
grants, but cooperative agreements are
possible if the Federal Government will
be substantially involved in carrying out
the project. You can find a description
of most programs in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) or
on our Web site at https://
wsfrprograms.fws.gov.
Implementing
regulations in
the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CFDA
Program
Authority
15.616 ...........................
15.668 ...........................
Clean Vessel Act ..................................................
Coastal Impact Assistance Program M .................
50 CFR 85
None
15.614 ...........................
Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act.
Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation
Fund.
33 U.S.C. 1322; 16 U.S.C. 777c ..........................
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, as amended;
31 U.S.C. 6301–6305.
16 U.S.C. 3951 et seq. ........................................
16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., with special reference to
section 1535.
50 CFR 81
15.615 ...........................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 Aug 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
50 CFR 84
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47862-47864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19648]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
National Environmental Policy Act: Implementing Procedures;
Addition to Categorical Exclusions for Bureau of Indian Affairs
AGENCY: Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Final National Environmental Policy Act Implementing
Procedures.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the addition of a new categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to be
included in the Departmental Manual 516 DM 10. The proposed categorical
exclusion pertains to the leasing and funding for single-family
homesites on Indian land, including associated improvements and
easements, which encompass five acres or less of contiguous land.
[[Page 47863]]
DATES: Effective Date: The categorical exclusion is effective August
10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: To obtain a copy of the new categorical exclusion contact
Marvin Keller, NEPA Coordinator--Indian Affairs, 12220 Sunrise Valley
Drive, Reston, VA 20191, email: Marv.Keller@bia.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marvin Keller, NEPA Coordinator--
Indian Affairs, (703) 390-6470.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The need for adequate housing is critical on most Indian
reservations. Several hundred actions associated with new home
construction are processed each year and this is expected to continue
at the same level. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) has typically
conducted NEPA reviews of actions associated with single-family homes
by preparing environmental assessments which resulted in Findings of No
Significant Impact. The addition of a categorical exclusion to cover
the actions associated with new home construction will allow for a more
efficient NEPA review.
Because this categorical exclusion has important implications for
actions occurring daily on Indian lands, the BIA initiated consultation
and requested comments from all federally recognized tribes. This
consultation period began on March 7, 2012, and concluded on May 14,
2012. Public comments were also solicited through a notice placed in
the Federal Register on May 3, 2012 [77 FR 26314]. The proposed
language for the categorical exclusion as set out in the notice was as
follows: ``Approval of leases, easements or funds for single-family
homesites and associated improvements, including but not limited to
homes, outbuildings, access roads, and utility lines, which encompass
five (5) acres or less of contiguous land, provided that such sites and
associated improvements do not adversely affect any tribal cultural
resources or historic properties and are in compliance with applicable
federal and tribal laws.''
Comments on the Proposal
The BIA received responses from 14 tribes and one tribal
organization. No public responses were received. The responses were in
the form of letters and email messages. All responses supported the
proposed categorical exclusion; a few suggested minor changes in the
language of the categorical exclusion.
Comment: One respondent expressed a concern about neighboring
tribes or tribal members constructing homes within their reservation
without complying with the tribe's laws. The respondent suggested that
the categorical exclusion should not be available for non-members or
outside tribes to construct homes on another tribe's lands.
Response: The categorical exclusion is intended to be applicable to
all tribes and tribal members who propose to construct single-family
homes on tribal land or individually-owned Indian land. However, the
proposed text of the categorical exclusion includes specific language
that references ``compliance with federal and tribal laws;'' therefore,
this categorical exclusion could not be used for any home construction
that does not comply with tribal law. The BIA does not propose any
additional changes to the language of the categorical exclusion in
response to this comment.
Comment: One respondent expressed concern that because of a
decrease in funds for the BIA Housing Improvement Program (HIP) the
categorical exclusion would not be effective.
Response: The HIP funding levels are outside the scope of this
proposal. However, the categorical exclusion is intended to address all
BIA actions associated with constructing single-family homes and
includes actions not associated with HIP funding.
Comment: A respondent suggested that the categorical exclusion
should include Housing and Urban Development (HUD) approved housing
activities.
Response: The BIA categorical exclusion can only apply to BIA
actions and cannot apply to another agency such as HUD. The proposed
BIA categorical exclusion is intended to be consistent with HUD's
existing categorical exclusions, so that the level of environmental
review will be similar.
Comment: A respondent suggested that since the categorical
exclusion is intended to include new construction this term should be
added to the text.
Response: The BIA agrees, and text of the categorical exclusion has
been changed to clearly indicate that it includes new construction as
intended.
Comment: A respondent noted that the BIA Federal Register notice
indicates a single-family homesite may include one to four dwelling
units, but the number of dwelling units is not referenced in the text
of the categorical exclusion. It was suggested that the number of
dwelling units should be referenced, and that, because the key factors
limiting the use of the categorical exclusion should be the area of
land affected (five acres) and the absence of any extraordinary
circumstances, it should not matter whether the limit of four dwelling
units are in a single building, two duplexes or four detached units.
Response: The BIA agrees the categorical exclusion should be
clearly defined as including one to four dwelling units as intended.
The BIA also believes that the categorical exclusion should be flexible
enough to include a range of housing options. We therefore added text
to the categorical exclusion to clarify that home construction may
include up to four dwelling units, whether in a single building or up
to four separate buildings. This clarification will also ensure the
categorical exclusion is consistent with HUD's existing categorical
exclusion [24 CFR 58.35(a)(4)(i)].
Comment: One respondent asked for clarification as to who would
have approval authority for the categorical exclusion: the agency
superintendent or a compacted self-governance tribe.
Response: Because the Federal government is responsible for
complying with NEPA, the approval authority for the categorical
exclusion is with the BIA responsible official. Tribes can prepare the
supporting NEPA documentation, but the approval must remain with the
BIA.
Conclusion
The Department of the Interior and the BIA find that the action
defined in the categorical exclusion presented at the end of this
notice does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect
on the human environment. This finding is based on the analysis of
similar categorical exclusions used by other Federal departments and
agencies; the professional judgment of BIA environmental personnel who
had conducted environmental reviews of similar actions, which resulted
in Findings of No Significant Impact; and the post-construction
monitoring of homesites by environmental personnel that verified no
unforeseen effects had occurred.
Categorical Exclusion
The Department of the Interior will add the following categorical
exclusion to the Departmental Manual at 516 DM 10.5:
Approvals of leases, easements or funds for single family
homesites and associated improvements, including, but not limited
to, construction of homes, outbuildings, access roads, and utility
lines, which encompass five acres or less of contiguous lands,
provided that such sites and associated
[[Page 47864]]
improvements do not adversely affect any tribal cultural resources
or historic properties and are in compliance with applicable Federal
and tribal laws. Home construction may include up to four dwelling
units, whether in a single building or up to four separate
buildings.
Dated: August 3, 2012.
Willie R. Taylor,
Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2012-19648 Filed 8-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-W7-P
