Determination of Failure To Attain the One-Hour Ozone Standard by 2007, Determination of Current Attainment of the One-Hour Ozone Standard, Determinations of Attainment of the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standards for the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island Nonattainment Area in Connecticut, New Jersey and New York, 47533-47534 [2012-19570]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 26, 2012.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. The added text reads as
follows:
Subpart M—Hawaii
Therefore, 40 CFR part 52 is amended
as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR
Part 52 continues to read as follows:
■
47533
§ 52.620
2. Amend § 52.620, the table in
paragraph (e) by adding an entry at the
end of the table for Hawaii
Infrastructure State Implementation
Plan Revision 1997 Ozone, and 1997
and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)
■
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) EPA Approved Nonregulatory
Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory
Measures.
EPA-APPROVED HAWAII NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
Name of SIP revision
*
*
Hawaii Infrastructure State Implementation Plan Revision 1997
Ozone, and 1997 and 2006
Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.
State
submittal
date
*
Statewide .........
12/14/12 ..
[FR Doc. 2012–19301 Filed 8–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R02–OAR–2011–0956; FRL–9696–2]
Determination of Failure To Attain the
One-Hour Ozone Standard by 2007,
Determination of Current Attainment of
the One-Hour Ozone Standard,
Determinations of Attainment of the
1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standards for
the New York-Northern New JerseyLong Island Nonattainment Area in
Connecticut, New Jersey and New
York
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
AGENCY:
This document corrects an
error in the regulatory language of a
final rule pertaining to Clean Data
determinations for the State of New
Jersey published June 18, 2012. The
action announced our approval of four
separate and independent
determinations related to the New YorkNorthern New Jersey-Long Island (NY–
NJ–CT) one-hour and 1997 eight-hour
ozone nonattainment areas. This action
corrects erroneous paragraph
designations in the June 18, 2012 final
rule.
DATES: This correction is effective on
August 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Aug 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
EPA approval date
*
8/9/12, [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
Explanation
*
*
*
Excluding all regulations included in the submission, as these were already addressed in separate actions as listed in table (c) above. This
action addresses the following CAA elements
or portions thereof: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C),
(D)(i)(I), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M).
No. EPA–R02–OAR–2011–0956. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region II Office, Air Programs Branch,
290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007–1866. This Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The Docket telephone
number is 212–637–4249.
Paul
Truchan, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290
Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New
York 10278, (212) 637–4249.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On June
18, 2012, 77 FR 36163, EPA published
a final rulemaking action announcing
our approval of four separate and
independent determinations related to
the New York-Northern New JerseyLong Island (NY–NJ–CT) one-hour and
1997 eight-hour ozone nonattainment
areas. In that document, § 52.1576 of
title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) was amended, but the
amendatory instructions inadvertently
designated an existing paragraph
incorrectly as (a) and incorrectly
reserved paragraph (b). The intent of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
rule was to retain the amendments as
promulgated on May 16, 2012, 77 FR
28782 and add two new paragraphs (c)
and (d) pursuant to the June 18, 2012,
77 FR 36163. This action corrects the
erroneous paragraph designations. For
the convenience of the reader, and to
ensure it reads correctly, the entire
§ 52.1576 is set out in the regulatory text
of this document.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because we are merely
correcting an incorrect citation in a
previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that
this constitutes good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
E:\FR\FM\09AUR1.SGM
09AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
47534
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
addition, this rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the
state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Aug 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 9, 2012.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: July 31, 2012.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart FF—New Jersey
2. Section 52.1576 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.1576
Determinations of attainment.
(a) Based upon EPA’s review of the air
quality data for the 3-year period 2008
to 2010, EPA determined that
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City,
PA–NJ–MD–DE 8-hour ozone moderate
nonattainment area (the Philadelphia
Area) attained the 1997 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) by the applicable attainment
date of June 15, 2011. Therefore, EPA
has met the requirement pursuant to
CAA section 181(b)(2)(A) to determine,
based on the area’s air quality as of the
attainment date, whether the area
attained the standard. EPA also
determined that the Philadelphia Area
nonattainment area will not be
reclassified for failure to attain by its
applicable attainment date under
section 181(b)(2)(A).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
(b) Based upon EPA’s review of the air
quality data for the 3-year period 2007
to 2009, EPA determined that the
Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA–NJ–DE
fine particle (PM2.5) nonattainment area
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
by the applicable attainment date of
April 5, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met
the requirement pursuant to CAA
section 179(c) to determine, based on
the area’s air quality as of the attainment
date, whether the area attained the
standard. EPA also determined that the
Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA–NJ–DE
PM2.5 nonattainment area is not subject
to the consequences of failing to attain
pursuant to section 179(d).
(c) Based upon EPA’s review of the air
quality data for the three-year period
2005 to 2007, EPA determined, as of
June 18, 2012, that the New YorkNorthern New Jersey-Long Island (NY–
NJ–CT) one-hour ozone nonattainment
area did not meet its applicable onehour ozone attainment date of
November 15, 2007. Separate from and
independent of this determination,
based on 2008–2010 complete, qualityassured ozone monitoring data at all
monitoring sites in the area, and data for
2011, EPA determined, as of June 18,
2012, that the NY–NJ–CT one-hour
ozone nonattainment area has attained
the one-hour ozone standard.
(d) Based upon EPA’s review of
complete, quality-assured and certified
air quality data for the three-year period
2007 to 2009, and data for 2011, EPA
determined, as of June 18, 2012, that the
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long
Island (NY–NJ–CT) eight-hour ozone
moderate nonattainment area attained
the 1997 eight-hour ozone NAAQS by
the applicable attainment date of June
15, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the
requirement pursuant to CAA section
181(b)(2)(A) to determine, based on the
area’s air quality data as of the
attainment date, whether the area
attained the standard. EPA also
determined that the NY–NJ–CT
nonattainment area will not be
reclassified for failure to attain by its
applicable attainment date under
section 181(b)(2)(A).
[FR Doc. 2012–19570 Filed 8–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\09AUR1.SGM
09AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47533-47534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19570]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R02-OAR-2011-0956; FRL-9696-2]
Determination of Failure To Attain the One-Hour Ozone Standard by
2007, Determination of Current Attainment of the One-Hour Ozone
Standard, Determinations of Attainment of the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone
Standards for the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island
Nonattainment Area in Connecticut, New Jersey and New York
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the regulatory language of
a final rule pertaining to Clean Data determinations for the State of
New Jersey published June 18, 2012. The action announced our approval
of four separate and independent determinations related to the New
York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island (NY-NJ-CT) one-hour and 1997
eight-hour ozone nonattainment areas. This action corrects erroneous
paragraph designations in the June 18, 2012 final rule.
DATES: This correction is effective on August 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R02-OAR-2011-0956. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region II Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. This Docket Facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number is 212-637-4249.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Truchan, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10278, (212) 637-4249.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 18, 2012, 77 FR 36163, EPA published
a final rulemaking action announcing our approval of four separate and
independent determinations related to the New York-Northern New Jersey-
Long Island (NY-NJ-CT) one-hour and 1997 eight-hour ozone nonattainment
areas. In that document, Sec. 52.1576 of title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) was amended, but the amendatory instructions
inadvertently designated an existing paragraph incorrectly as (a) and
incorrectly reserved paragraph (b). The intent of the rule was to
retain the amendments as promulgated on May 16, 2012, 77 FR 28782 and
add two new paragraphs (c) and (d) pursuant to the June 18, 2012, 77 FR
36163. This action corrects the erroneous paragraph designations. For
the convenience of the reader, and to ensure it reads correctly, the
entire Sec. 52.1576 is set out in the regulatory text of this
document.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because we are merely correcting
an incorrect citation in a previous action. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
[[Page 47534]]
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition,
this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not
approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes
that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments
or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 9, 2012. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 31, 2012.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart FF--New Jersey
0
2. Section 52.1576 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1576 Determinations of attainment.
(a) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year
period 2008 to 2010, EPA determined that Philadelphia-Wilmington-
Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area
(the Philadelphia Area) attained the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the applicable attainment date of June
15, 2011. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA
section 181(b)(2)(A) to determine, based on the area's air quality as
of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard. EPA
also determined that the Philadelphia Area nonattainment area will not
be reclassified for failure to attain by its applicable attainment date
under section 181(b)(2)(A).
(b) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year
period 2007 to 2009, EPA determined that the Philadelphia-Wilmington,
PA-NJ-DE fine particle (PM2.5) nonattainment area attained
the 1997 annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Therefore,
EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 179(c) to
determine, based on the area's air quality as of the attainment date,
whether the area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the
Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE PM2.5 nonattainment area
is not subject to the consequences of failing to attain pursuant to
section 179(d).
(c) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the three-
year period 2005 to 2007, EPA determined, as of June 18, 2012, that the
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island (NY-NJ-CT) one-hour ozone
nonattainment area did not meet its applicable one-hour ozone
attainment date of November 15, 2007. Separate from and independent of
this determination, based on 2008-2010 complete, quality-assured ozone
monitoring data at all monitoring sites in the area, and data for 2011,
EPA determined, as of June 18, 2012, that the NY-NJ-CT one-hour ozone
nonattainment area has attained the one-hour ozone standard.
(d) Based upon EPA's review of complete, quality-assured and
certified air quality data for the three-year period 2007 to 2009, and
data for 2011, EPA determined, as of June 18, 2012, that the New York-
Northern New Jersey-Long Island (NY-NJ-CT) eight-hour ozone moderate
nonattainment area attained the 1997 eight-hour ozone NAAQS by the
applicable attainment date of June 15, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the
requirement pursuant to CAA section 181(b)(2)(A) to determine, based on
the area's air quality data as of the attainment date, whether the area
attained the standard. EPA also determined that the NY-NJ-CT
nonattainment area will not be reclassified for failure to attain by
its applicable attainment date under section 181(b)(2)(A).
[FR Doc. 2012-19570 Filed 8-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P