Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Mojave Desert, Northern Sierra, Sacramento Metropolitan and San Diego Air Pollution Agencies, 47581-47582 [2012-19316]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0311; FRL–9687–2]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management
District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management
District (SMAQMD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). This revision concerns the
definition of volatile organic
compounds (VOC). We are approving a
local rule that helps regulate VOCs
under the Clean Air Act, as amended
(CAA or the Act).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by September 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2012–0311, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:15 Aug 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the
docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia G. Allen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal addresses the following local
rule: Rule 101. In the Rules and
Regulations section of this Federal
Register, we are approving this local
rule in a direct final action without
prior proposal because we believe this
SIP revision is not controversial. If we
receive adverse comments, however, we
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule. Please note that
if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: May 10, 2012.
Jared Blumeneld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012–19314 Filed 8–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0332; FRL–9687–7]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Mojave Desert,
Northern Sierra, Sacramento
Metropolitan and San Diego Air
Pollution Agencies
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
47581
Proposed rule.
EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Mojave Desert Air
Quality Management District
(MDAQMD), Northern Sierra Air
Quality Management District
(NSAQMD), Sacramento Metropolitan
Air Quality Management District
(SMAQMD) and San Diego County Air
Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD)
portions of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from
automotive parts and component,
automobile refinishing, metal parts and
products, and miscellaneous coating
and refinishing operations. We are
proposing to approve local rules to
regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990
(CAA or the Act).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by September 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number R09–OAR–
2012–0332, by one of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
47582
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the
docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andy Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4115, Steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal addresses the following local
rules: MDAQMD Rule 1116, Automotive
Refinishing Operations; NSAQMD Rule
228, Surface Coating and Metal Parts
and Products; SMAQMD Rule 459,
Automotive, Mobile Equipment and
Associated Parts and Components
Coating, and SDCAPCD Rule 66.1,
Miscellaneoous Coating. In the Rules
and Regulations section of this Federal
Register, we are approving these local
rules in a direct final action without
prior proposal because we believe these
SIP revisions are not controversial. If we
receive adverse comments, however, we
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule. Please note that
if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: May 22, 2012.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012–19316 Filed 8–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Todd Haviland, Management
& Program Analyst, Office of Great
Lakes Pilotage, Commandant (CG–
WWM–2), U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
202–372–1909, email
todd.a.haviland@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
NPRM published August 1, 2012 (77 FR
45539) contains an inaccurate value on
page 45558. This correction amends row
3, column 5 of the table below in
instruction (3) of the NPRM. The Coast
Guard is republishing the table to
correct the error.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Part 401
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0409]
RIN 1625–AB89
Great Lakes Pilotage Rates—2013
Annual Review and Adjust; Correction
Correction
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
correction.
The Coast Guard published a
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
in the Federal Register on August 1,
2012 (77 FR 45539) proposing rate
adjustments for pilotage services on the
Great Lakes. The charge rate, as listed in
§ 401.407, Area 5 (Designated Waters) of
that NPRM, is incorrect.
In proposed rule FR Doc. 2012–18714,
beginning on page 45539 in the issue of
August 1, 2012, make the following
correction. On page 45558, in,
§ 401.407, revise paragraph (b),
including the footnote to Table (b), to
read as follows:
§ 401.407 Basic rates and charges on Lake
Erie and the navigable waters from
Southeast Shoal to Port Huron, MI.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
Toledo or any
point on Lake
Erie west of
Southeast
Shoal
Southeast
Shoal
Any point on or in
Toledo or any port on Lake Erie west of Southeast Shoal
Port Huron Change Point ....................................................
St. Clair River .......................................................................
Detroit or Windsor or the Detroit River ................................
Detroit Pilot Boat ..................................................................
1 When
The notice of proposed
rulemaking published in the Federal
Register on August 1, 2012 (77 FR
45539) is corrected as of August 9, 2012.
DATES:
$2,339
$1,382
1 4,074
1 4,719
1 4,074
N/A
3,037
2,339
2,339
1,693
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Area 5 (Designated Waters):
Detroit River
$3,037
3,060
3,060
1,382
N/A
pilots are not changed at the Detroit Pilot Boat.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Dated: August 2, 2012.
Kathryn Sinniger,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2012–19348 Filed 8–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:15 Aug 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Detroit Pilot
Boat
$2,339
2,381
3,060
N/A
N/A
St. Clair River
N/A
1,693
1,382
3,060
3,060
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 154 (Thursday, August 9, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47581-47582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19316]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0332; FRL-9687-7]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Mojave
Desert, Northern Sierra, Sacramento Metropolitan and San Diego Air
Pollution Agencies
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Mojave Desert Air
Quality Management District (MDAQMD), Northern Sierra Air Quality
Management District (NSAQMD), Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality
Management District (SMAQMD) and San Diego County Air Pollution Control
District (SDCAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions from automotive parts and component, automobile refinishing,
metal parts and products, and miscellaneous coating and refinishing
operations. We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by September 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number R09-OAR-2012-
0332, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov
[[Page 47582]]
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at
the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and
some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To
inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during
normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4115, Steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local
rules: MDAQMD Rule 1116, Automotive Refinishing Operations; NSAQMD Rule
228, Surface Coating and Metal Parts and Products; SMAQMD Rule 459,
Automotive, Mobile Equipment and Associated Parts and Components
Coating, and SDCAPCD Rule 66.1, Miscellaneoous Coating. In the Rules
and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are approving
these local rules in a direct final action without prior proposal
because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. If we
receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal
of the direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action
based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we receive adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.
Dated: May 22, 2012.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012-19316 Filed 8-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
