Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review in Part, 47362-47363 [2012-19447]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
47362
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 8, 2012 / Notices
and use of mail, landline telephone, and
internet modes. The 2013 Alternative
Contact Strategy Test is the first test to
support this research.
The Census Bureau will test alternate
contact information through a selfresponse test. Telephone numbers
obtained from commercial vendors will
be used to contact 40,000 households.
Information on the household’s
communication and contact modes will
be collected. The information will be
analyzed to inform future contact
strategies for 2020 Research and Testing
Project tests and design options for the
2020 Census.
II. Method of Collection
The Census Bureau will conduct the
2013 Alternative Contact Strategy Test
with a national sample of 40,000
households, utilizing Computer
Assisted Telephone Interviews. The
Census Bureau estimates the response
rate to be 65 percent. Interviewers will
call households to confirm and collect
contact information such as address,
telephone, cell, and email.
The Census Bureau plans to conduct
the 2013 Alternative Contact Strategy
Test data collection in early winter of
2013. The specific data collection start
and end dates along with the duration
of the data collection period are still
under consideration. The Census
Bureau, however, expects that the
duration of the data collection period
will be about a month.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number: To be determined.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
40,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 7
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 4666.7 hours (280,000 minutes).
Estimated Total Annual Cost: There is
no cost to the respondent other than the
time to answer the information request.
Respondents Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.
Sections 141 and 193.
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Aug 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: August 2, 2012.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–19333 Filed 8–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review in Part
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 28, 2010, the
Department initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on diamond sawblades and parts thereof
(diamond sawblades) from the People’s
Republic of China (the PRC). The period
of review is January 23, 2009, through
October 31, 2010. The Department is
rescinding this review in part.
DATES: Effective Date: August 8, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–5760.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Rescission of Administrative Review in
Part
On December 28, 2010, based on
timely requests for an administrative
review, the Department published in the
Federal Register a notice of initiation of
an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from the PRC.1 In accordance
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 81565
(December 28, 2010).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review ‘‘if a party that
requested the review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation of the
requested review.’’ On March 28, 2011,
the petitioner, Diamond Sawblades
Manufacturers Coalition, withdrew its
request for review of sales of subject
merchandise with respect to Hebei Jikai
Industrial Group Co., Ltd. (Hebei Jikai)
and Jiangyin Likn Industry Co., Ltd.
(Jiangyin Likn). These two companies
have separate rates from a prior segment
of this proceeding.2 In Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Intent to
Rescind Review in Part, 76 FR 76135
(December 6, 2011), we inadvertently
assigned the PRC-wide rate to these
companies. However, it is the
Department’s practice to rescind an
administrative review with respect to a
company that has a separate rate from
a prior segment of the proceeding where
the only party that requested a review
timely withdrew its request.3
On June 4, 2012, the Department
deferred issuing the final results of this
administrative review in order to
investigate further serious allegations of
fraud in the concurrent administrative
review of diamond sawblades and parts
thereof from Korea.4 These allegations
involve Korean affiliates of a Chinese
mandatory respondent (Weihai
Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co.,
Ltd.) and a Chinese separate-rate
company (Qingdao Shinhan Diamond
Industrial Co., Ltd.). That said, because
we received letters withdrawing the
requests for review of Hebei Jikai and
Jiangyin Likn within the 90-day time
limit, and we received no other requests
for review of these companies, the
Department is rescinding this review
with respect diamond sawblades from
the PRC exported by these two
companies in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), The Department will
issue appropriate assessment
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
2 See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Final Partial Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances: Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China, 71 FR 29303 (May 22, 2006).
3 See, e.g., Certain Steel Threaded Rod From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
the Administrative Review, Intent To Rescind, and
Rescission, in Part, 77 FR 27022, 27023 (May 8,
2012).
4 See Memorandum from Gary Taverman to Paul
Piquado titled ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and Parts
Thereof from the Republic of Korea and the
People’s Republic of China: Deferral of the Final
Results of the First Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews’’ dated June 4, 2012.
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 8, 2012 / Notices
Protection 15 days after publication of
this notice.
Notification to Importer
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: August 2, 2012.
Gary Taverman,
Senior Advisor for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012–19447 Filed 8–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–952]
Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge From the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Results and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is
conducting an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on narrow
woven ribbons with woven selvedge
(‘‘Ribbons’’) from the People’s Republic
of China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review
(‘‘POR’’) is September 1, 2010, through
August 31, 2011.
As discussed below, the Department
preliminarily determines that the PRCwide entity made sales in the United
States at prices below normal value
(‘‘NV’’). If the preliminary results are
adopted in our final results of
administrative review, we will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) to assess antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries. Interested
parties are invited to comment on the
preliminary results.
We invite interested parties to
comment on these preliminary results.
Parties who submit comments are
wreier-aviles on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Aug 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
requested to submit with each argument
a summary of the argument. We intend
to issue the final results no later than
120 days from the date of publication of
this notice, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’).
DATES: Effective Date: August 8, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karine Gziryan or Robert Bolling, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4081 and (202)
482–3434 respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 1, 2010, the
Department published in the Federal
Register an antidumping duty order on
NWR from the PRC.1 On September 23,
2011, the Department published in the
Federal Register a notice of opportunity
to request an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on NWR
from the PRC for the period September
1, 2010, through August 31, 2011.2 On
September 21, 29th, and 30th, 2011, the
Department received timely requests in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(2)
for an administrative review from
Weifang Dongfang Ribbon Weaving Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Weifang Dongfang’’), Stribbons
(Guangzhou) Ltd. (‘‘Stribbons
Guangzhou’’), Stribbons (Nanyang)
MNC, Ltd. (‘‘Stribbons MNC’’),
Yangzhou Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Col,
Ltd. (‘‘Bestpak’’), and Precious Planet
Ribbons & Bows Co., Ltd. (‘‘Precious
Planet’’). On September 30, 2011, the
Department also received a timely
request from Berwick Offray LLC and its
wholly-owned subsidiary Lion Ribbon
Company, Inc. (collectively,
‘‘Petitioners’’), in accordance with 19
CFR 351.213(b)(1), for an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on NWR from the PRC for ten
companies: Yama Ribbons and Bows
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yama Ribbons’’),
Hubschercorp (Canada), Apex Ribbon
(Canada), Pacific Imports (Canada),
Supreme Laces Inc. (Canada),
Multicolor Inc. (Canada), Apex
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Narrow
Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan
and the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping
Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 1, 2010), as
amended in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic
of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75
FR 56982 (September 17, 2010) (‘‘Orders’’).
2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 76 FR 54735
(September 2, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47363
Trimmings (Canada), Papillon Ribbon &
Bow (Canada), FinerRibbon.com
(Canada), and Intercontinental Skyline
(Canada).
On October 31, 2011, the Department
published a notice of initiation of an
antidumping duty administrative review
on NWR from the PRC, in which it
initiated a review of Hubschercorp,
Apex Ribbon, Pacific Imports, Supreme
Laces Inc., Multicolor Inc., Apex
Trimmings, Papillon Ribbon & Bow
(Canada), FinerRibbon.com.,
Intercontinental Skyline, Weifang
Dongfang, Stribbons Guangzhou,
Stribbons MNC, Bestpak, Precious
Planet, and Yama Ribbons.3
On November 16, 2011, the
Department placed on the record CBP
import data for certain Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings. On November
23, 2011, the Department received
comments from Stribbons (Guangzhou)
Ltd., Stribbons (Nanyang) MNC, Ltd.,
Bestpak and Petitioners. After
examining the CBP data and the
comments from the interested parties,
the Department concluded that the
import data was reported using
inconsistent units of measurement. The
Department was, therefore, unable to
select mandatory respondents based
soley on this data.
On December 6, 2011, to clarify the
import data on the record, the
Department issued quantity and value
(‘‘Q&V’’) questionnaires to exporters
who allegedly had imports of NWR
during the POR according to the CBP
import data on the record. The
Department requested that the
companies report the Q&V of their POR
exports and/or shipments of NWR to the
United States using specified units of
measurement. The Department also
received Q&V submissions from
Hubscher Ribbon Corp., Ltd.
(‘‘Hubschercorp’’) and Precious Planet
on December 20, 2011.4
Because the PRC is a non-market
economy (‘‘NME’’), companies wishing
to receive a separate antidumping rate
for purposes of this administrative
review were required to file a timely
separate rate application or separate rate
certification. The separate rate
application and/or certification in this
case were due within 60 days from the
initiation of the antidumping
administrative review,5 no later than
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Requests for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 67133
(October 31, 2011) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
4 See Shanghai Dayspring Gifts Corp. Ltd. did not
respond to the Department’s Q&V questionnaire.
5 See Initiation Notice, 76 FR at 67133–134
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47362-47363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19447]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of
China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review in Part
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 28, 2010, the Department initiated an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from the People's
Republic of China (the PRC). The period of review is January 23, 2009,
through October 31, 2010. The Department is rescinding this review in
part.
DATES: Effective Date: August 8, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Rescission of Administrative Review in Part
On December 28, 2010, based on timely requests for an
administrative review, the Department published in the Federal Register
a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on diamond sawblades from the PRC.\1\ In accordance with 19
CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an administrative review
``if a party that requested the review withdraws the request within 90
days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of the
requested review.'' On March 28, 2011, the petitioner, Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition, withdrew its request for review of
sales of subject merchandise with respect to Hebei Jikai Industrial
Group Co., Ltd. (Hebei Jikai) and Jiangyin Likn Industry Co., Ltd.
(Jiangyin Likn). These two companies have separate rates from a prior
segment of this proceeding.\2\ In Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Intent to Rescind Review in Part, 76 FR
76135 (December 6, 2011), we inadvertently assigned the PRC-wide rate
to these companies. However, it is the Department's practice to rescind
an administrative review with respect to a company that has a separate
rate from a prior segment of the proceeding where the only party that
requested a review timely withdrew its request.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 75 FR
81565 (December 28, 2010).
\2\ See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Final Partial Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances:
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of
China, 71 FR 29303 (May 22, 2006).
\3\ See, e.g., Certain Steel Threaded Rod From the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review,
Intent To Rescind, and Rescission, in Part, 77 FR 27022, 27023 (May
8, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 4, 2012, the Department deferred issuing the final results
of this administrative review in order to investigate further serious
allegations of fraud in the concurrent administrative review of diamond
sawblades and parts thereof from Korea.\4\ These allegations involve
Korean affiliates of a Chinese mandatory respondent (Weihai Xiangguang
Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.) and a Chinese separate-rate company
(Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd.). That said, because we
received letters withdrawing the requests for review of Hebei Jikai and
Jiangyin Likn within the 90-day time limit, and we received no other
requests for review of these companies, the Department is rescinding
this review with respect diamond sawblades from the PRC exported by
these two companies in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), The
Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border
[[Page 47363]]
Protection 15 days after publication of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman to Paul Piquado titled
``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the Republic of Korea and
the People's Republic of China: Deferral of the Final Results of the
First Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews'' dated June 4, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importer
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: August 2, 2012.
Gary Taverman,
Senior Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-19447 Filed 8-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
