The Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson v. National Grid Generation LLC; Notice of Complaint, 47051-47052 [2012-19280]
Download as PDF
47051
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 7, 2012 / Notices
based rate tariff and the prices reported
for use in price indices.
The five-year statute of limitations
applies where the Commission seeks
civil penalties for violations of the AntiManipulation rule or other rules,
regulations, or orders to which the price
information may be relevant.
any orders authorizing market-based
rate sales.
Type of Respondents: Public Utility
Market-Based Rate Authorization
Holders.
Estimate of Annual Burden 1: The
Commission estimates the total Public
Reporting Burden for this information
collection as:
The information maintained by the
respondents under FERC–915 is used by
the Commission to monitor the entities’
sales, ensure that the prices are just and
reasonable, maintain the integrity of the
wholesale jurisdictional sales markets,
and ensure that the entities comply with
the requirements of the Federal Power
Act, the Commission’s regulations and
FERC–915 (IC12–13–000): PUBLIC UTILITY MARKET-BASED RATE AUTHORIZATION HOLDERS—RECORDS RETENTION
REQUIREMENT
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total number
of responses
Average
burden hours
per response
Estimated total
annual burden
(A)
1,730
(B)
1
(A) × (B) = (C)
1,730
(D)
1
(C) × (D)
1,730
Electric Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority .............
The total estimated annual cost
burden to respondents is $369,638
[$40,655 (labor costs) + $315,792 (record
retention/storage cost) + $13,191
(electronic record-keeping cost) =
$369,638]
• Labor costs: $40,655 [(1,730 hours ÷
2 2 = 865 hours * $19/hours 3 = $16,435)
+ (1730 hours ÷ 2 = 865 * $28/hour 4 =
$24,220)]
• Record retention/storage cost (using
an estimate of 48,891 cubic feet):
$315,792 5
• Electronic record retention/storage
cost: $13,191 (1,730 respondents ÷ 2 =
865 respondents * $15.25/hour 6 =
$13,191).7
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden and cost of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information collection;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Notice of Commissioner and Staff
Attendance at North American Electric
Reliability Corporation Meetings
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission) hereby gives
notice that members of the Commission
and/or Commission staff may attend the
following meetings:
North American Electric Reliability
Corporation
Member Representatives Committee and
Board of Trustees Meetings
Hilton Quebec, Rene-Levesque Blvd.
East, Quebec City, QC, Canada, G1R
4P3.
August 15, 2012 (1 p.m.–5 p.m.)
August 16, 2012 (8 a.m.–1 p.m.)
Further information regarding these
meetings may be found at: https://
www.nerc.com/calendar.php.
The discussions at the meetings,
which are open to the public, may
address matters at issue in the following
Commission proceedings:
Docket No. RC08–5, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
Docket No. RC11–5, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
Docket No. RC11–6, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
Docket No. RR08–4, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
Docket No. RR12–8, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
1 Burden is defined as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency. For further
explanation of what is included in the information
collection burden, reference 5 Code of Federal
Regulations 1320.3.
2 The Commission assumes 50% of responding
entities utilize conventional (i.e. ‘‘paper’’ storage).
3 2012 average hourly wage of filing clerk working
within an electric utility.
4 The Commission bases the $28/hour figure on
a FERC staff study that included estimating public
utility recordkeeping costs.
Dated: August 1, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–19266 Filed 8–6–12; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Aug 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Docket No. RR12–10, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
Docket No. RR12–11, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
Docket No. RD09–11, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
Docket No. RD10–2, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
Docket No. RD12–3, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
Docket No. RD12–4, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
Docket No. NP11–238, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
For further information, please
contact Jonathan First, 202–502–8529,
or jonathan.first@ferc.gov.
Dated: August 1, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–19270 Filed 8–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL12–89–000]
The Incorporated Village of Port
Jefferson v. National Grid Generation
LLC; Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on July 30, 2012,
pursuant to Rule 206 of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission’s
(Commission) Rules of Practice and
Procedure; 18 CFR 385.206 (2011) and
18 CFR 1c, and sections 206, 222, 306
5 The Commission bases this figure on industry
archival storage costs.
6 Per entity; the Commission bases this figure on
the estimated cost to service and to store 1 GB of
data (based on the aggregated cost of an IBM
advanced data protection server).
7 The Commission assumes 50% of responding
entities are storing records in electronic formats.
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
47052
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 7, 2012 / Notices
and 309 of the Federal Power Act, The
Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson
(Complainant) filed a formal complaint
against the National Grid Generation
LLC (Respondent) requesting a
Commission investigation and hearing
regarding certain conduct of the
Respondent. As more fully explained in
the Complaint, Complainant alleges that
the Respondent is currently perpetrating
fraudulent practices and illegally
exercising market power.
The Complainant certifies that copies
of the complaint were served on the
contacts for the Respondent as listed on
the Commission’s list of Corporate
Officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. The Respondent’s answer
and all interventions, or protests must
be filed on or before the comment date.
The Respondent’s answer, motions to
intervene, and protests must be served
on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on August 20, 2012.
Dated: July 31, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–19280 Filed 8–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Aug 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. PF12–11–000]
El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice
of Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for the Planned
Sasabe Lateral Project and Request for
Comments on Environmental Issues
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
that will discuss the environmental
impacts of the Sasabe Lateral Project
(Project) involving construction and
operation of facilities by El Paso Natural
Gas Company (El Paso) in Pima County,
Arizona. The Commission will use this
EIS in its decision-making process to
determine whether the Project is in the
public convenience and necessity.
This notice announces the opening of
the scoping process the Commission
will use to gather input from the public
and interested agencies on the Project.
Your input will help the Commission
staff determine what issues they need to
evaluate in the EIS.
You may submit comments in written
form or verbally. Further details on how
to submit written comments are in the
Public Participation section of this
notice. In addition, the Commission
intends to host public scoping meetings
in the Project area. The times and
locations of scoping meetings will be
announced in a future Notice of Scoping
Meetings. Scoping will close 7 days
after the last scoping meeting.
This notice is being sent to the
Commission’s current environmental
mailing list for the Sasabe Lateral
Project, and the forthcoming Notice of
Scoping Meetings will also be sent out
to this list. State and local government
representatives should notify their
constituents of this planned project and
encourage them to comment on their
areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, a pipeline company
representative may contact you about
the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the
planned facilities. The company would
seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable
agreement. However, if the Commission
approves the Project, that approval
conveys with it the right of eminent
domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an
agreement, the pipeline company could
initiate condemnation proceedings
where compensation would be
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
determined in accordance with state
law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility On My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ is available for viewing on
the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). This
fact sheet addresses a number of
typically-asked questions, including the
use of eminent domain and how to
participate in the Commission’s
proceedings.
Summary of the Planned Project
The Project would consist of the
following facilities in Pima County,
Arizona:
• Installation of about 60 miles of 36inch-diameter natural gas pipeline;
• Construction of a new meter station
near the U.S.-Mexico border; and
• Construction of other appurtenant
facilities.
The Project would link El Paso’s
existing South Mainline System near
Tucson to the U.S.-Mexico border near
the town of Sasabe, Arizona. El Paso is
currently considering two routes for the
pipeline: the West Route and the East
Route. The West Route would be located
on private and state lands. The East
Route would be located on private,
state, and federal lands. The East Route
would primarily follow an existing
highway right-of-way and traverse the
Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge.
The general location of the Project
facilities is shown in Appendix 1.1
According to El Paso, the planned
Project would provide additional
natural gas export capability of between
160 and 210 million cubic feet of
natural gas per day to an interconnect
with the Puerto Libertad Pipeline at the
international border. The Mexico
´
Comision Federal de Electricidad has
specified this point as their desired
receipt point in order to supply gas for
power generation.
Land Requirements for Construction
Construction of the planned facilities
would disturb about 815 acres of land
for the pipeline and aboveground
facilities. Following construction, El
Paso would maintain about 362 acres for
permanent operation of the Project’s
facilities; the remaining acreage would
be restored and revert to former uses.
About 70 percent of the East Route
parallels existing utility or road rights1 The appendices referenced in this notice will
not appear in the Federal Register. Copies of the
appendices were sent to all those receiving this
notice in the mail and are available at www.ferc.gov
using the link called ‘‘eLibrary’’ or from the
Commission’s Public Reference Room, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, or call (202)
502–8371. For instructions on connecting to
eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47051-47052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19280]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL12-89-000]
The Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson v. National Grid
Generation LLC; Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on July 30, 2012, pursuant to Rule 206 of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice
and Procedure; 18 CFR 385.206 (2011) and 18 CFR 1c, and sections 206,
222, 306
[[Page 47052]]
and 309 of the Federal Power Act, The Incorporated Village of Port
Jefferson (Complainant) filed a formal complaint against the National
Grid Generation LLC (Respondent) requesting a Commission investigation
and hearing regarding certain conduct of the Respondent. As more fully
explained in the Complaint, Complainant alleges that the Respondent is
currently perpetrating fraudulent practices and illegally exercising
market power.
The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served
on the contacts for the Respondent as listed on the Commission's list
of Corporate Officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 20, 2012.
Dated: July 31, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-19280 Filed 8-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P