Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 47075-47076 [2012-19240]
Download as PDF
47075
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 7, 2012 / Notices
outcomes, and use of personal
protective equipment. Previous reports
describing occupational injuries and
illnesses to EMS workers provide
limited details on specific regions or
sub-segments of the population. As
compared to these earlier studies, the
scope of the telephone interview data
will be broader as it includes sampled
cases nationwide and has no limitations
in regards to type of employment (i.e.,
volunteer versus career). Results from
the telephone interviews will be
weighted and reported as estimates of
EMS workers treated for occupational
injuries and illnesses in emergency
departments.
The sample size for the telephone
interview survey is estimated to be
approximately 150 EMS workers
annually for the proposed four year
duration of the study. This estimate is
based on preliminary analysis of the
data collected to-date. This revised
estimate was reduced from the original
sample projection of 175 EMS workers.
Consequently, the burden has been
reduced as well. Each telephone
interview will take approximately 20
minutes to complete, resulting in an
annualized burden estimate of 50 hours.
This project is a collaborative effort
between the Division of Safety Research
in the NIOSH and the Office of
Emergency Medical Services in the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. Both agencies have a
strong interest in improving
surveillance of EMS worker injuries and
illnesses to provide the information
necessary for effectively targeting and
implementing prevention efforts and,
consequently, reducing occupational
injuries and illnesses among EMS
workers.
There is no cost to respondents other
than their time. The total estimated
annualized burden hours are 50.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondents
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
EMS workers ...............................................................................................................................
150
1
20/60
Dated: July 31, 2012.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI),
Office of the Associate Director for Science
(OADS), Office of the Directoros, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012–19255 Filed 8–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Proposed Project
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–12–12PZ]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–7570 or send
comments to Kimberly S. Lane, at 1600
Clifton Road, MS D74, Atlanta, GA
30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Aug 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proficiency Testing in U.S. Clinical
Laboratories: Perception, Practices and
Potential for Expanded Utility—NEW—
the Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology
and Laboratory Services (OSELS),
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The primary focus of this project is to
conduct a systematic analysis in order
to understand which types of
laboratories would be likely to follow
Proficiency Testing (PT) Good
Laboratory Practices (GLPs). The
Association of Public Health
Laboratories (APHL) and CDC (Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention)
hope to learn more about which
laboratories are not following Clinical
Laboratory Amendments of 1988 (CLIA)
PT guidelines and the reasons why. Our
survey population frame is 20,500
Certificate of Compliance laboratories
and 16,800 Certificate of Accreditation
laboratories. All of these laboratories are
required to perform PT in accordance
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with the CLIA. Many of these labs also
use their PT results internally for
laboratory quality improvement (PT
GLPs).
In addition, Centers for Medicaid and
Medicare Services (CMS) and CDC are
currently collaborating to revise the
CLIA regulations to update the list of
non-microbiological tests (analytes) for
which PT is required, and to update the
requirements for microbiology PT. Both
of these changes are expected to have
some impact on clinical and public
health laboratories, but CDC has very
little data to estimate the impact. This
information is needed to complete the
regulatory impact analysis. The
Department of Health and Human
Services knows very little about which
analytes are tested in the affected
laboratories other than those for which
PT is required by CLIA regulations. This
survey will ask laboratories whether
they offer testing for candidate analytes,
and how the regulatory changes would
impact their costs and PT practices in
their laboratory. Similarly for
microbiology laboratories, CMS and
CDC are considering whether to remove
the levels of service model for PT
enrollment. Therefore the survey will
ask a sample of microbiology
laboratories how this and other
potential changes would impact their
costs, PT practices, and perceived risk
of failing PT.
The goal of this project is to complete
a needs assessment to identify the
populations that would benefit from
receiving information on PT GLPs.
Since laboratories already pay for these
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
47076
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 7, 2012 / Notices
PT materials, information provided to
further use PT for quality improvement
purposes has the potential to further
improve laboratory quality at no
additional cost to U.S. clinical
laboratories.
The first phase of this project was
conducted by Association of Public
Health Laboratories (APHL) through
focus group research in 2011. The focus
groups explored how clinical and public
health laboratories perceived
commercial PT programs, and explored
the ways in which the laboratories used
PT (GLPs) to assure and improve the
quality of testing in their own
laboratories. This second phase of the
project will be administration of a
survey to help identify laboratories that
would benefit from learning additional
uses for PT and providing information
on how to disseminate them to
specifically Survey Monkey. APHL will
send each laboratory a postmarked letter
explaining the survey and providing
them with a link to log in to the survey
with a unique identifier on their address
label. Two weeks afterwards, APHL will
follow-up with a postcard reminder
which will also include that unique
identifier on the address label.
Approximately 37,300 clinical
laboratories will be targeted and
solicited to take the on-line survey. Each
laboratory is permitted to submit only
one completed survey. Preliminary pilot
testing indicates completion of the online survey will take approximately 15
minutes. Assuming a 80% response rate,
there would be 29,840 respondents.
There are no costs to respondents
other than their time.
laboratories in a strategic and targeted
way.
The goal is to achieve an 80%
response rate (29,840 out of 37,300
labs). APHL and CDC will strive to
ensure a high response rate by
promoting the survey through
advertisements in laboratory trade
publications, at professional meetings,
and possibly through programs and
laboratory accreditation organizations.
The cohort of laboratories will be all
laboratories listed in the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Online
Survey, Certification and Reporting
(OSCAR) database. The OSCAR
database contains demographic
information and practice characteristics
for all laboratories included in the
database.
The survey will be administered
through a web-based survey system,
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hrs)
Total burden
(in hrs)
Type of respondent
Form name
Laboratorians ....................................
Laboratory Practices ........................
29,840
1
20/60
9,947
Total ...........................................
...........................................................
........................
........................
........................
9,947
Dated: July 31, 2012.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI),
Office of the Associate Director for Science
(OADS), Office of the Directors, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012–19240 Filed 8–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Title: Cross-Site Evaluation of the
Infant Adoption Awareness Training
Program for Projects Initially Funded in
Fiscal Year 2006.
OMB No.: 0970–0371.
Description: The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF), Children’s
Bureau (CB), will conduct the Cross-Site
Evaluation of the Infant Adoption
Awareness Training Program (IAATP).
Title XII, Subtitle A, of the Children’s
Health Act of 2000 (CHA) authorizes the
Department of Health and Human
Services to make Infant Adoption
Awareness Training grants available to
national, regional, and local adoption
organizations for the purposes of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Aug 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
developing and implementing programs
that train the staff of public and nonprofit private health service
organizations to provide adoption
information and referrals to pregnant
women on an equal basis with all other
courses of action included in nondirective counseling of pregnant
women. Participants in the training
include individuals who provide
pregnancy or adoption information and
those who will provide such services
after receiving the training, with Title X
(relating to voluntary family planning
projects), Section 330 (relating to
community health centers, migrant
health centers, and centers serving
homeless individuals and residents of
public housing), and CHA-funded
school-based health centers, receiving
priority to receive the training. A total
of six organizations were awarded
IAATP funding in 2006.
Section 1201(a)(2)(A) of the IAATP
legislation requires grantees to develop
and deliver trainings that are consistent
with the Best Practice Guidelines for
Infant Adoption Awareness Training.
The IAATP guidelines address training
goals, basic skills, curriculum and
training structure. A complete
description of the guidelines is available
at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/
programs_fund/discretionary/iaatp.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In addition, grantees are required to
conduct local evaluation of program
outcomes and participate in the national
evaluation of the extent to which IAATP
training objectives are met. The Infant
Adoption Awareness Training Program:
Trainee Survey is the primary data
collection instrument for the national
cross-site evaluation. Respondents will
complete the survey prior to receiving
training and approximately 90 days after
the training to assess the extent to
which trainees demonstrate sustained
gains in their knowledge about
adoption, and to determine the impact
of the training on their subsequent work
with pregnant women.
1. Do health care workers who
participate in the IAATP training:
Demonstrate enhanced knowledge,
attitudes, skills, and behaviors with
respect to adoption counseling
following completion of the program?
Provide adoption information to
pregnant women on an equal basis with
other pregnancy planning options?
Demonstrate enhanced awareness of
community adoption-related resources
and refer expectant mothers to them as
needed?
2. Are trainees more confident about
discussing all three pregnancy planning
options (parenting, abortion, and
adoption) in a non-directive counseling
style than they were prior to
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47075-47076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19240]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[60Day-12-12PZ]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects.
To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a
copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404-639-7570 or
send comments to Kimberly S. Lane, at 1600 Clifton Road, MS D74,
Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Proficiency Testing in U.S. Clinical Laboratories: Perception,
Practices and Potential for Expanded Utility--NEW--the Office of
Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services (OSELS), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The primary focus of this project is to conduct a systematic
analysis in order to understand which types of laboratories would be
likely to follow Proficiency Testing (PT) Good Laboratory Practices
(GLPs). The Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) and CDC
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) hope to learn more about
which laboratories are not following Clinical Laboratory Amendments of
1988 (CLIA) PT guidelines and the reasons why. Our survey population
frame is 20,500 Certificate of Compliance laboratories and 16,800
Certificate of Accreditation laboratories. All of these laboratories
are required to perform PT in accordance with the CLIA. Many of these
labs also use their PT results internally for laboratory quality
improvement (PT GLPs).
In addition, Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) and
CDC are currently collaborating to revise the CLIA regulations to
update the list of non-microbiological tests (analytes) for which PT is
required, and to update the requirements for microbiology PT. Both of
these changes are expected to have some impact on clinical and public
health laboratories, but CDC has very little data to estimate the
impact. This information is needed to complete the regulatory impact
analysis. The Department of Health and Human Services knows very little
about which analytes are tested in the affected laboratories other than
those for which PT is required by CLIA regulations. This survey will
ask laboratories whether they offer testing for candidate analytes, and
how the regulatory changes would impact their costs and PT practices in
their laboratory. Similarly for microbiology laboratories, CMS and CDC
are considering whether to remove the levels of service model for PT
enrollment. Therefore the survey will ask a sample of microbiology
laboratories how this and other potential changes would impact their
costs, PT practices, and perceived risk of failing PT.
The goal of this project is to complete a needs assessment to
identify the populations that would benefit from receiving information
on PT GLPs. Since laboratories already pay for these
[[Page 47076]]
PT materials, information provided to further use PT for quality
improvement purposes has the potential to further improve laboratory
quality at no additional cost to U.S. clinical laboratories.
The first phase of this project was conducted by Association of
Public Health Laboratories (APHL) through focus group research in 2011.
The focus groups explored how clinical and public health laboratories
perceived commercial PT programs, and explored the ways in which the
laboratories used PT (GLPs) to assure and improve the quality of
testing in their own laboratories. This second phase of the project
will be administration of a survey to help identify laboratories that
would benefit from learning additional uses for PT and providing
information on how to disseminate them to laboratories in a strategic
and targeted way.
The goal is to achieve an 80% response rate (29,840 out of 37,300
labs). APHL and CDC will strive to ensure a high response rate by
promoting the survey through advertisements in laboratory trade
publications, at professional meetings, and possibly through programs
and laboratory accreditation organizations.
The cohort of laboratories will be all laboratories listed in the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Online Survey, Certification
and Reporting (OSCAR) database. The OSCAR database contains demographic
information and practice characteristics for all laboratories included
in the database.
The survey will be administered through a web-based survey system,
specifically Survey Monkey. APHL will send each laboratory a postmarked
letter explaining the survey and providing them with a link to log in
to the survey with a unique identifier on their address label. Two
weeks afterwards, APHL will follow-up with a postcard reminder which
will also include that unique identifier on the address label.
Approximately 37,300 clinical laboratories will be targeted and
solicited to take the on-line survey. Each laboratory is permitted to
submit only one completed survey. Preliminary pilot testing indicates
completion of the on-line survey will take approximately 15 minutes.
Assuming a 80% response rate, there would be 29,840 respondents.
There are no costs to respondents other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Number of burden per Total burden
Type of respondent Form name respondents responses per response (in (in hrs)
respondent hrs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laboratorians................. Laboratory 29,840 1 20/60 9,947
Practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... ................ .............. .............. .............. 9,947
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: July 31, 2012.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI), Office of the Associate
Director for Science (OADS), Office of the Directors, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-19240 Filed 8-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P