Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 47075-47076 [2012-19240]

Download as PDF 47075 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 7, 2012 / Notices outcomes, and use of personal protective equipment. Previous reports describing occupational injuries and illnesses to EMS workers provide limited details on specific regions or sub-segments of the population. As compared to these earlier studies, the scope of the telephone interview data will be broader as it includes sampled cases nationwide and has no limitations in regards to type of employment (i.e., volunteer versus career). Results from the telephone interviews will be weighted and reported as estimates of EMS workers treated for occupational injuries and illnesses in emergency departments. The sample size for the telephone interview survey is estimated to be approximately 150 EMS workers annually for the proposed four year duration of the study. This estimate is based on preliminary analysis of the data collected to-date. This revised estimate was reduced from the original sample projection of 175 EMS workers. Consequently, the burden has been reduced as well. Each telephone interview will take approximately 20 minutes to complete, resulting in an annualized burden estimate of 50 hours. This project is a collaborative effort between the Division of Safety Research in the NIOSH and the Office of Emergency Medical Services in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Both agencies have a strong interest in improving surveillance of EMS worker injuries and illnesses to provide the information necessary for effectively targeting and implementing prevention efforts and, consequently, reducing occupational injuries and illnesses among EMS workers. There is no cost to respondents other than their time. The total estimated annualized burden hours are 50. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Type of respondents Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hours) EMS workers ............................................................................................................................... 150 1 20/60 Dated: July 31, 2012. Ron A. Otten, Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI), Office of the Associate Director for Science (OADS), Office of the Directoros, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2012–19255 Filed 8–6–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Proposed Project Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [60Day–12–12PZ] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404–639–7570 or send comments to Kimberly S. Lane, at 1600 Clifton Road, MS D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:52 Aug 06, 2012 Jkt 226001 agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Proficiency Testing in U.S. Clinical Laboratories: Perception, Practices and Potential for Expanded Utility—NEW— the Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services (OSELS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description The primary focus of this project is to conduct a systematic analysis in order to understand which types of laboratories would be likely to follow Proficiency Testing (PT) Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs). The Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) and CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) hope to learn more about which laboratories are not following Clinical Laboratory Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) PT guidelines and the reasons why. Our survey population frame is 20,500 Certificate of Compliance laboratories and 16,800 Certificate of Accreditation laboratories. All of these laboratories are required to perform PT in accordance PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 with the CLIA. Many of these labs also use their PT results internally for laboratory quality improvement (PT GLPs). In addition, Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) and CDC are currently collaborating to revise the CLIA regulations to update the list of non-microbiological tests (analytes) for which PT is required, and to update the requirements for microbiology PT. Both of these changes are expected to have some impact on clinical and public health laboratories, but CDC has very little data to estimate the impact. This information is needed to complete the regulatory impact analysis. The Department of Health and Human Services knows very little about which analytes are tested in the affected laboratories other than those for which PT is required by CLIA regulations. This survey will ask laboratories whether they offer testing for candidate analytes, and how the regulatory changes would impact their costs and PT practices in their laboratory. Similarly for microbiology laboratories, CMS and CDC are considering whether to remove the levels of service model for PT enrollment. Therefore the survey will ask a sample of microbiology laboratories how this and other potential changes would impact their costs, PT practices, and perceived risk of failing PT. The goal of this project is to complete a needs assessment to identify the populations that would benefit from receiving information on PT GLPs. Since laboratories already pay for these E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 07AUN1 47076 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 7, 2012 / Notices PT materials, information provided to further use PT for quality improvement purposes has the potential to further improve laboratory quality at no additional cost to U.S. clinical laboratories. The first phase of this project was conducted by Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) through focus group research in 2011. The focus groups explored how clinical and public health laboratories perceived commercial PT programs, and explored the ways in which the laboratories used PT (GLPs) to assure and improve the quality of testing in their own laboratories. This second phase of the project will be administration of a survey to help identify laboratories that would benefit from learning additional uses for PT and providing information on how to disseminate them to specifically Survey Monkey. APHL will send each laboratory a postmarked letter explaining the survey and providing them with a link to log in to the survey with a unique identifier on their address label. Two weeks afterwards, APHL will follow-up with a postcard reminder which will also include that unique identifier on the address label. Approximately 37,300 clinical laboratories will be targeted and solicited to take the on-line survey. Each laboratory is permitted to submit only one completed survey. Preliminary pilot testing indicates completion of the online survey will take approximately 15 minutes. Assuming a 80% response rate, there would be 29,840 respondents. There are no costs to respondents other than their time. laboratories in a strategic and targeted way. The goal is to achieve an 80% response rate (29,840 out of 37,300 labs). APHL and CDC will strive to ensure a high response rate by promoting the survey through advertisements in laboratory trade publications, at professional meetings, and possibly through programs and laboratory accreditation organizations. The cohort of laboratories will be all laboratories listed in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Online Survey, Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) database. The OSCAR database contains demographic information and practice characteristics for all laboratories included in the database. The survey will be administered through a web-based survey system, ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hrs) Total burden (in hrs) Type of respondent Form name Laboratorians .................................... Laboratory Practices ........................ 29,840 1 20/60 9,947 Total ........................................... ........................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 9,947 Dated: July 31, 2012. Ron A. Otten, Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI), Office of the Associate Director for Science (OADS), Office of the Directors, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2012–19240 Filed 8–6–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Title: Cross-Site Evaluation of the Infant Adoption Awareness Training Program for Projects Initially Funded in Fiscal Year 2006. OMB No.: 0970–0371. Description: The Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Children’s Bureau (CB), will conduct the Cross-Site Evaluation of the Infant Adoption Awareness Training Program (IAATP). Title XII, Subtitle A, of the Children’s Health Act of 2000 (CHA) authorizes the Department of Health and Human Services to make Infant Adoption Awareness Training grants available to national, regional, and local adoption organizations for the purposes of VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:52 Aug 06, 2012 Jkt 226001 developing and implementing programs that train the staff of public and nonprofit private health service organizations to provide adoption information and referrals to pregnant women on an equal basis with all other courses of action included in nondirective counseling of pregnant women. Participants in the training include individuals who provide pregnancy or adoption information and those who will provide such services after receiving the training, with Title X (relating to voluntary family planning projects), Section 330 (relating to community health centers, migrant health centers, and centers serving homeless individuals and residents of public housing), and CHA-funded school-based health centers, receiving priority to receive the training. A total of six organizations were awarded IAATP funding in 2006. Section 1201(a)(2)(A) of the IAATP legislation requires grantees to develop and deliver trainings that are consistent with the Best Practice Guidelines for Infant Adoption Awareness Training. The IAATP guidelines address training goals, basic skills, curriculum and training structure. A complete description of the guidelines is available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/ programs_fund/discretionary/iaatp.htm. PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 In addition, grantees are required to conduct local evaluation of program outcomes and participate in the national evaluation of the extent to which IAATP training objectives are met. The Infant Adoption Awareness Training Program: Trainee Survey is the primary data collection instrument for the national cross-site evaluation. Respondents will complete the survey prior to receiving training and approximately 90 days after the training to assess the extent to which trainees demonstrate sustained gains in their knowledge about adoption, and to determine the impact of the training on their subsequent work with pregnant women. 1. Do health care workers who participate in the IAATP training: Demonstrate enhanced knowledge, attitudes, skills, and behaviors with respect to adoption counseling following completion of the program? Provide adoption information to pregnant women on an equal basis with other pregnancy planning options? Demonstrate enhanced awareness of community adoption-related resources and refer expectant mothers to them as needed? 2. Are trainees more confident about discussing all three pregnancy planning options (parenting, abortion, and adoption) in a non-directive counseling style than they were prior to E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM 07AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47075-47076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[60Day-12-12PZ]


Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and 
Recommendations

    In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on 
proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. 
To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a 
copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404-639-7570 or 
send comments to Kimberly S. Lane, at 1600 Clifton Road, MS D74, 
Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology. Written comments should be received 
within 60 days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Proficiency Testing in U.S. Clinical Laboratories: Perception, 
Practices and Potential for Expanded Utility--NEW--the Office of 
Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services (OSELS), Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    The primary focus of this project is to conduct a systematic 
analysis in order to understand which types of laboratories would be 
likely to follow Proficiency Testing (PT) Good Laboratory Practices 
(GLPs). The Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) and CDC 
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) hope to learn more about 
which laboratories are not following Clinical Laboratory Amendments of 
1988 (CLIA) PT guidelines and the reasons why. Our survey population 
frame is 20,500 Certificate of Compliance laboratories and 16,800 
Certificate of Accreditation laboratories. All of these laboratories 
are required to perform PT in accordance with the CLIA. Many of these 
labs also use their PT results internally for laboratory quality 
improvement (PT GLPs).
    In addition, Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) and 
CDC are currently collaborating to revise the CLIA regulations to 
update the list of non-microbiological tests (analytes) for which PT is 
required, and to update the requirements for microbiology PT. Both of 
these changes are expected to have some impact on clinical and public 
health laboratories, but CDC has very little data to estimate the 
impact. This information is needed to complete the regulatory impact 
analysis. The Department of Health and Human Services knows very little 
about which analytes are tested in the affected laboratories other than 
those for which PT is required by CLIA regulations. This survey will 
ask laboratories whether they offer testing for candidate analytes, and 
how the regulatory changes would impact their costs and PT practices in 
their laboratory. Similarly for microbiology laboratories, CMS and CDC 
are considering whether to remove the levels of service model for PT 
enrollment. Therefore the survey will ask a sample of microbiology 
laboratories how this and other potential changes would impact their 
costs, PT practices, and perceived risk of failing PT.
    The goal of this project is to complete a needs assessment to 
identify the populations that would benefit from receiving information 
on PT GLPs. Since laboratories already pay for these

[[Page 47076]]

PT materials, information provided to further use PT for quality 
improvement purposes has the potential to further improve laboratory 
quality at no additional cost to U.S. clinical laboratories.
    The first phase of this project was conducted by Association of 
Public Health Laboratories (APHL) through focus group research in 2011. 
The focus groups explored how clinical and public health laboratories 
perceived commercial PT programs, and explored the ways in which the 
laboratories used PT (GLPs) to assure and improve the quality of 
testing in their own laboratories. This second phase of the project 
will be administration of a survey to help identify laboratories that 
would benefit from learning additional uses for PT and providing 
information on how to disseminate them to laboratories in a strategic 
and targeted way.
    The goal is to achieve an 80% response rate (29,840 out of 37,300 
labs). APHL and CDC will strive to ensure a high response rate by 
promoting the survey through advertisements in laboratory trade 
publications, at professional meetings, and possibly through programs 
and laboratory accreditation organizations.
    The cohort of laboratories will be all laboratories listed in the 
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Online Survey, Certification 
and Reporting (OSCAR) database. The OSCAR database contains demographic 
information and practice characteristics for all laboratories included 
in the database.
    The survey will be administered through a web-based survey system, 
specifically Survey Monkey. APHL will send each laboratory a postmarked 
letter explaining the survey and providing them with a link to log in 
to the survey with a unique identifier on their address label. Two 
weeks afterwards, APHL will follow-up with a postcard reminder which 
will also include that unique identifier on the address label.
    Approximately 37,300 clinical laboratories will be targeted and 
solicited to take the on-line survey. Each laboratory is permitted to 
submit only one completed survey. Preliminary pilot testing indicates 
completion of the on-line survey will take approximately 15 minutes. 
Assuming a 80% response rate, there would be 29,840 respondents.
    There are no costs to respondents other than their time.

                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      Average
                                                     Number of       Number of      burden per     Total burden
      Type of respondent            Form name       respondents    responses per   response  (in     (in hrs)
                                                                    respondent         hrs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laboratorians.................  Laboratory                29,840               1           20/60           9,947
                                 Practices.
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.....................  ................  ..............  ..............  ..............           9,947
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: July 31, 2012.
Ron A. Otten,
Director, Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI), Office of the Associate 
Director for Science (OADS), Office of the Directors, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-19240 Filed 8-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.