Agency Information Collection Activities: Collection; Comments Requested; Application for Approval as a Provider of a Personal Financial Management Instructional Course, 47093-47094 [2012-19227]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 7, 2012 / Notices
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on May 4, 2011, based on a complaint
filed on behalf of Kaneka Corporation of
Osaka, Japan (‘‘Kaneka’’). 76 FR 25373
(May 4, 2011). The complaint alleges
violations of Section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the sale for importation,
importation, or sale after importation of
certain polyimide films, products
containing same, and related methods
by reason of infringement of one or
more of claims 1–3 and 9–10 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,264,866 (‘‘the ‘866 patent’’);
claims 1–6 of U.S. Patent No. 6,746,639
(‘‘the ‘639 patent’’); claims 1–5 of U.S.
Patent No. 7,018,704 (‘‘the ‘704 patent’’);
and claims 1–20 of U.S. Patent No.
7,691,961 (‘‘the ‘961 patent’’). The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named as respondents SKC Kolon PI,
Inc. of Gyeonggi-do, South Korea and
SKC Corporation of Covington, Georgia
(‘‘collectively, ‘‘SKC’’).
On February 23, 2012, the
Commission issued notice of its
determination not to review an ID
(Order No. 26) that Kaneka has satisfied
the importation requirement with
respect to all versions of the following
SKC products: IN30 (75 um), IN70
(19um), IN 70 (25um), IN70 (50um),
IF30 (7.5um), IF70 (12.5um), LV100,
LV200, and LV300.
On February 27, 2012, the
Commission issued notice of its
determination not to review an ID
(Order No. 25) terminating the
investigation with respect to claims 4–
5 of the ‘704 patent and claims 4, 11, 16,
17, and 20 of the ‘961 patent.
An evidentiary hearing was held from
March 12, 2012, to March 16, 2012.
On May 10, 2012, the ALJ issued a
final ID finding no violation of section
337 in the above-identified
investigation. Specifically, the ALJ
found that there was no violation with
respect to the ‘866 patent, the ‘639
patent, the ‘704 patent, or the ‘961
patent by SKC. The ALJ also issued a
recommended determination on remedy
and bonding.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Aug 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
On May 22, 2012, Kaneka filed a
petition for review of the final ID and on
May 23, 2012, SKC filed a contingent
petition for review. On May 30, 2012,
SKC filed a response to Kaneka’s
petition, and on May 31, 2012, Kaneka
filed a response to SKC’s contingent
petition.
Having examined the final ID, the
petitions for review, the responses
thereto, and the relevant portions of the
record in this investigation, the
Commission has determined to partially
review the final ID as follows. With
respect to the ‘866 patent, the
Commission has determined to review
the finding that Kaneka does not satisfy
the technical prong of the domestic
industry requirement. With respect to
the ‘704 patent, the Commission has
determined to review and vacate as
moot the ALJ’s alternative findings that
the accused products do not infringe,
that claim 1 is not invalid for
anticipation or obviousness, and that
Kaneka does not satisfy the technical
prong or the economic prong of the
domestic industry requirement. The
Commission has determined not to
review the ALJ’s conclusion that the
asserted claims of the ‘704 patent are
invalid for indefiniteness. With respect
to the ‘961 patent, the Commission has
determined to review the ALJ’s finding
that certain of the accused products
infringe and certain of the accused
products do not infringe claim 9. The
Commission has determined not to
review the remainder of the ID.
The parties are requested to brief their
positions on only the following
questions, with reference to the
applicable law and the evidentiary
record:
With respect to the ‘866 patent, would
a complainant satisfy the technical
prong of the domestic industry
requirement if the products offered to
satisfy the requirement met the elements
of the asserted claims only
intermittently or occasionally? See ID at
302.
(1) With respect to claim 9 of the ‘961
patent, would a person of ordinary skill
in the art require all replicates to be
within the claimed range? Is there any
evidence of record to indicate how a
person of ordinary skill in the art would
use confidence intervals or other
statistical methods of working with
variance to compare replicates with a
claimed range?
The Commission does not request
briefing on remedy, the public interest,
and bonding at this time.
Written Submissions: The parties to
the investigation are requested to file
written submissions on the issues under
review. The submissions should be
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47093
concise and thoroughly referenced to
the record in this investigation,
including references to exhibits and
testimony. The written submissions
must be filed no later than the close of
business on August 15, 2012. Reply
submissions must be filed no later than
the close of business on August 22,
2012. No further submissions will be
permitted unless otherwise ordered by
the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must do so in accordance with
Commission rule 210.4(f), 19 CFR
210.4(f), which requires electronic
filing. The original document and eight
true copies thereof must also be filed on
or before the deadlines stated above
with the Office of the Secretary. Any
person desiring to submit a document
(or portion thereof) to the Commission
in confidence must request confidential
treatment unless the information has
already been granted such treatment
during the proceedings. All such
requests should be directed to the
Secretary of the Commission and must
include a full statement of the reasons
why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment is
granted by the Commission will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential
written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Secretary.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and under Part 210 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 2, 2012.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2012–19218 Filed 8–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1105–0085]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Collection; Comments
Requested; Application for Approval
as a Provider of a Personal Financial
Management Instructional Course
30-Day notice of application
under review.
ACTION:
The Department of Justice, Executive
Office for United States Trustees, has
submitted the following application to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with the Paperwork
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
47094
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 7, 2012 / Notices
Reduction Act of 1995. The application
is published to obtain comments from
the public and affected agencies. This
application was previously published in
the Federal Register Volume 77,
Number 106, page 32671, on June 1,
2012, allowing for a 60-day comment
period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for an additional 30 days for public
comment until September 6, 2012. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Department of Justice Desk
Officer, Washington, DC 20503.
Additionally, comments may be
submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202)
395–7285.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the application are
encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
1. Evaluate whether the application is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
Type of information collection: .................................................................
The title of the form/collection: .................................................................
The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the
department sponsoring the collection:
Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a
brief abstract:
An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply:
An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the
collection:
If additional information is required,
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Washington,
DC 20530.
Dated: August 1, 2012.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2012–19227 Filed 8–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging of First Amendment
to Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
Notice is hereby given that on July 26,
2012, a proposed first amendment to
consent decree with Schlumberger
Technology Corporation (‘‘Consent
Decree Amendment’’) in United States
vs. Schlumberger Industries, Inc., Civil
Action No. 91-cv-04222 was lodged
with the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Illinois.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:30 Aug 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Overview of the Information
Application form.
Application for Approval as a Provider of a Personal Financial Management Instructional Course.
No form number.
Executive Office for United States Trustees, Department of Justice.
Primary: Individuals who wish to offer instructional courses to student
debtors concerning personal financial management.
Other: None.
Congress passed a bankruptcy law that requires individuals who file for
bankruptcy to complete an approved personal financial management
instructional course as a condition of receiving a discharge.
It is estimated that 275 respondents will complete the application in approximately five (5) hours.
The estimated total annual public burden associated with this application is 1,375 hours.
In this action, the United States
sought injunctive relief and cost
recovery claims under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675, against
Schlumberger Industries Inc.
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
(‘‘STC’’) was subsequently substituted
as Defendant and real party in interest.
Under the Consent Decree Amendment,
STC will perform the selected remedy
under a May 2007 Record of Decision
Amendment to address chlorinated
volatile organic compound
contaminated groundwater for areas
known as Plume 1 and Plume 3 at the
PCBs Operable Unit of the Crab Orchard
National Wildlife Refuge in Williamson,
Jackson, Union, and Johnson Counties,
Illinois. This work is valued at
$6,236,400 and is subject to a costsharing agreement between STC and the
U.S. Department of the Interior.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of 30 days from the date of
this publication comments relating to
the Consent Decree Amendment.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either emailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
PO 00000
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Sfmt 4703
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. Schlumberger Industries, Inc.,
D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–643.
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree Amendment may
also be examined on the following
Department of Justice Web site, https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Consent Decree Amendment may also
be obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or emailing a
request to ‘‘Consent Decree Copy’’
(EESCDCopy.ENRD@usdoj.gov,) fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–0097. If requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library
by mail, please enclose a check in the
amount of $35.00 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.
Treasury or, if requesting by email or
fax, forward a check in that amount to
the Consent Decree Library at the
address given above. In requesting a
copy exclusive of exhibits and
defendants’ signatures, please enclose a
check in the amount of $2.00 (25 cents
E:\FR\FM\07AUN1.SGM
07AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47093-47094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19227]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1105-0085]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Collection; Comments
Requested; Application for Approval as a Provider of a Personal
Financial Management Instructional Course
ACTION: 30-Day notice of application under review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department of Justice, Executive Office for United States
Trustees, has submitted the following application to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with
the Paperwork
[[Page 47094]]
Reduction Act of 1995. The application is published to obtain comments
from the public and affected agencies. This application was previously
published in the Federal Register Volume 77, Number 106, page 32671, on
June 1, 2012, allowing for a 60-day comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days
for public comment until September 6, 2012. This process is conducted
in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and suggestions regarding the items contained in
this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated
response time, should be directed to the Office of Management and
Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention:
Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503. Additionally,
comments may be submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 395-7285.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the application are encouraged. Your comments
should address one or more of the following four points:
1. Evaluate whether the application is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of the Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of information collection:........ Application form.
The title of the form/collection:...... Application for Approval as a
Provider of a Personal
Financial Management
Instructional Course.
The agency form number, if any, and the No form number.
applicable component of the department Executive Office for United
sponsoring the collection: States Trustees, Department of
Justice.
Affected public who will be asked or Primary: Individuals who wish
required to respond, as well as a to offer instructional courses
brief abstract: to student debtors concerning
personal financial management.
Other: None.
Congress passed a bankruptcy
law that requires individuals
who file for bankruptcy to
complete an approved personal
financial management
instructional course as a
condition of receiving a
discharge.
An estimate of the total number of It is estimated that 275
respondents and the amount of time respondents will complete the
estimated for an average respondent to application in approximately
respond/reply: five (5) hours.
An estimate of the total public burden The estimated total annual
(in hours) associated with the public burden associated with
collection: this application is 1,375
hours.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If additional information is required, contact: Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice,
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: August 1, 2012.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2012-19227 Filed 8-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-40-P