Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Forest County Potawatomi Community Reservation Class I Area, 46960-46961 [2012-19138]
Download as PDF
46960
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 7, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0501; FRL9699–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Forest County Potawatomi
Community Reservation Class I Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving procedures
for permitting certain sources in relation
to the Forest County Potawatomi
Community (FCP Community) Class I
Area into the Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
provisions were submitted by the
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources (WDNR) on May 12, 2011.
The provisions include the regulation of
certain sources constructing near the
FCP Community Class I Area, as well as
procedures for the FCP Community’s
demonstration regarding a source that
may have an adverse impact on the
Class I Area. The provisions implement
portions of a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) entered into by
Wisconsin and the FCP Community as
part of a dispute resolution related to
the Class I Area redesignation.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 6, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0501. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Danny
Marcus, Environmental Engineer, at
(312) 353–8781 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Danny Marcus, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Aug 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 353–8781,
marcus.danny@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is being addressed by this
document?
II. What sections of Wisconsin’s rules are
we approving?
III. What comments did we receive on the
proposed rule?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and executive order reviews.
I. What Is Being Addressed by This
Document?
On April 5, 2012, at 77 FR 20575, EPA
proposed to approve regulatory
revisions that Wisconsin submitted for
EPA’s approval which include defining
the geographic center of the FCP
Community Class I Area for purposes of
air quality management; provisions
which require proposed new major
sources or major modifications of
existing sources locating within 22.25
miles of the geographic center of the
FCP Community Class I Area to conduct
a Class I increment analysis; and
provisions which would require
proposed new major sources or major
modifications of existing sources
locating outside 22.25 miles of the
geographic center of the FCP
Community Class I Area to conduct a
Class II increment analysis. The rules
also include procedures for the FCP
Community to coordinate with the State
regarding comments on sources
potentially impacting the Class I Area
and to make a demonstration to the
State that a proposed source may have
an adverse effect on Air Quality Related
Values(AQRVs). Finally, the rules
provide the FCP Community with the
opportunity to review certain best
available control technology (BACT)
and maximum achievable control
technology (MACT) determinations
made by the State, and provide a
dispute resolution mechanism for
resolving disagreements regarding those
BACT or MACT determinations.
The changes to the Wisconsin SIP
implement portions of an MOA signed
by Wisconsin and the FCP Community
in 1999. This MOA was part of a dispute
resolution process related to the FCP
Community Class I Area redesignation
in 2008. For additional background
information on the Class I Area
redesignation, see 73 FR 23086, April
29, 2008, and 77 FR 20575, April 5,
2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. What sections of Wisconsin’s rules
are we approving?
EPA is approving revisions to
chapters NR 400, 405, and 406 of the
Wisconsin Administration Code into the
Wisconsin SIP. Specifically, we are
approving NR 400.02(66m), 405.19 and
406.08(4). The revisions include adding
a definition for the geographic center of
the FCP Community, as well as
establishing the distance from this
center point at which a major source or
major modification would be required to
comply with regulations regarding
impacts to the Class I Area, including a
Class I increment analysis and
consumption limits. Additionally, the
provisions establish procedures for the
FCP Community to have opportunities
to review BACT and MACT
determinations and to demonstrate that
impacts from a new source would have
an adverse impact on AQRV’s of the
FCP Community Class I Area.
III. What comments did we receive on
the proposed rule?
EPA provided a 30-day review and
comment period. The comment period
closed on May 7, 2012. EPA received
comments in support of the proposed
approval from the FCP Community. EPA
received no adverse comments on the
proposed rule.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
In today’s action, EPA is approving
NR 400.02(66m), 405.19 and 406.08(4)
into the Wisconsin SIP relating to
permitting for certain sources with the
potential to impact the FCP Community
Class I Area. As explained above, and at
77 FR 20575, the provisions will affect
permitting for those sources
constructing within a certain distance to
the FCP Community as well as any
source with the potential to have an
adverse impact on the increment or
AQRVs associated with the FCP
Community’s Class I Area. This action
does not affect any permitting within
the FCP Community’s reservation and
EPA remains the federal permitting
authority for the FCP Community’s
reservation.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Clean Air Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42
U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus,
in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as
E:\FR\FM\07AUR1.SGM
07AUR1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 7, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law. In May 2011, EPA issued its
policy on consultation and coordination
with Indian tribes. EPA explained that
its policy is to consult on a governmentto-government basis with Federally
recognized tribal governments when
EPA actions and decisions may affect
tribal interests. Accordingly, EPA
engaged in consultation with the FCP
Community regarding the Wisconsin
proposed SIP revisions. This process is
further described in 77 FR 20575,
20577.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Aug 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 9, 2012.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See Section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 27, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart YY—Wisconsin
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(125) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2570
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(125) On May 12, 2011, the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources
submitted a request to revise the State
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Implementation Plan regarding
procedures for permitting certain
sources in relation to the Forest County
Potawatomi Community Class I Area.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The
following sections of the Wisconsin
Administrative Code are incorporated
by reference:
(A) NR 400.02 Definitions. NR
400.02(66m) ‘‘Forest County
Potawatomi Community Class I area’’ or
‘‘FCPC Class I area’’ as published in the
Wisconsin Administrative Register
November 2010, No. 659, effective
December 1, 2010.
(B) NR 405.19 Forest County
Potawatomi Class I area, as published in
the Wisconsin Administrative Register
November 2010, No. 659, effective
December 1, 2010.
(C) NR 406.08 Action on permit
applications. NR 406.08(4)(a) and (4)(b)
as published in the Wisconsin
Administrative Register November 2010,
No. 659, effective December 1, 2010.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–19138 Filed 8–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0695; FRL–9689–8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Wisconsin;
Volatile Organic Compound Emission
Control Measures for Milwaukee and
Sheboygan Ozone Nonattainment
Areas
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving, under the
Clean Air Act (the Act), revisions to the
Wisconsin State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted on September 1, 2009,
November 16, 2011, and January 26,
2012. The purpose of these revisions is
to satisfy the Act’s requirement that
states revise their SIPs to include
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for sources of
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)
emissions in moderate ozone
nonattainment areas. Wisconsin’s VOC
rules provide RACT requirements for
the Milwaukee-Racine and Sheboygan
1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas.
These rules are approvable because they
are consistent with the Control
Technique Guideline (CTG) documents
issued by EPA in 2006 and 2007 and
satisfy the RACT requirements of the
Act. EPA proposed this rule for
SUMMARY:
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
46961
E:\FR\FM\07AUR1.SGM
07AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46960-46961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19138]
[[Page 46960]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0501; FRL9699-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Forest County Potawatomi Community Reservation Class I Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving procedures for permitting certain sources in
relation to the Forest County Potawatomi Community (FCP Community)
Class I Area into the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
provisions were submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources (WDNR) on May 12, 2011. The provisions include the regulation
of certain sources constructing near the FCP Community Class I Area, as
well as procedures for the FCP Community's demonstration regarding a
source that may have an adverse impact on the Class I Area. The
provisions implement portions of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
entered into by Wisconsin and the FCP Community as part of a dispute
resolution related to the Class I Area redesignation.
DATES: This final rule is effective on September 6, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0501. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Danny Marcus,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 353-8781 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Danny Marcus, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8781, marcus.danny@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is being addressed by this document?
II. What sections of Wisconsin's rules are we approving?
III. What comments did we receive on the proposed rule?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and executive order reviews.
I. What Is Being Addressed by This Document?
On April 5, 2012, at 77 FR 20575, EPA proposed to approve
regulatory revisions that Wisconsin submitted for EPA's approval which
include defining the geographic center of the FCP Community Class I
Area for purposes of air quality management; provisions which require
proposed new major sources or major modifications of existing sources
locating within 22.25 miles of the geographic center of the FCP
Community Class I Area to conduct a Class I increment analysis; and
provisions which would require proposed new major sources or major
modifications of existing sources locating outside 22.25 miles of the
geographic center of the FCP Community Class I Area to conduct a Class
II increment analysis. The rules also include procedures for the FCP
Community to coordinate with the State regarding comments on sources
potentially impacting the Class I Area and to make a demonstration to
the State that a proposed source may have an adverse effect on Air
Quality Related Values(AQRVs). Finally, the rules provide the FCP
Community with the opportunity to review certain best available control
technology (BACT) and maximum achievable control technology (MACT)
determinations made by the State, and provide a dispute resolution
mechanism for resolving disagreements regarding those BACT or MACT
determinations.
The changes to the Wisconsin SIP implement portions of an MOA
signed by Wisconsin and the FCP Community in 1999. This MOA was part of
a dispute resolution process related to the FCP Community Class I Area
redesignation in 2008. For additional background information on the
Class I Area redesignation, see 73 FR 23086, April 29, 2008, and 77 FR
20575, April 5, 2012.
II. What sections of Wisconsin's rules are we approving?
EPA is approving revisions to chapters NR 400, 405, and 406 of the
Wisconsin Administration Code into the Wisconsin SIP. Specifically, we
are approving NR 400.02(66m), 405.19 and 406.08(4). The revisions
include adding a definition for the geographic center of the FCP
Community, as well as establishing the distance from this center point
at which a major source or major modification would be required to
comply with regulations regarding impacts to the Class I Area,
including a Class I increment analysis and consumption limits.
Additionally, the provisions establish procedures for the FCP Community
to have opportunities to review BACT and MACT determinations and to
demonstrate that impacts from a new source would have an adverse impact
on AQRV's of the FCP Community Class I Area.
III. What comments did we receive on the proposed rule?
EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period. The comment period
closed on May 7, 2012. EPA received comments in support of the proposed
approval from the FCP Community. EPA received no adverse comments on
the proposed rule.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
In today's action, EPA is approving NR 400.02(66m), 405.19 and
406.08(4) into the Wisconsin SIP relating to permitting for certain
sources with the potential to impact the FCP Community Class I Area. As
explained above, and at 77 FR 20575, the provisions will affect
permitting for those sources constructing within a certain distance to
the FCP Community as well as any source with the potential to have an
adverse impact on the increment or AQRVs associated with the FCP
Community's Class I Area. This action does not affect any permitting
within the FCP Community's reservation and EPA remains the federal
permitting authority for the FCP Community's reservation.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as
[[Page 46961]]
meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. In May 2011, EPA
issued its policy on consultation and coordination with Indian tribes.
EPA explained that its policy is to consult on a government-to-
government basis with Federally recognized tribal governments when EPA
actions and decisions may affect tribal interests. Accordingly, EPA
engaged in consultation with the FCP Community regarding the Wisconsin
proposed SIP revisions. This process is further described in 77 FR
20575, 20577.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 9, 2012. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See Section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 27, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart YY--Wisconsin
0
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(125) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2570 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(125) On May 12, 2011, the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources submitted a request to revise the State Implementation Plan
regarding procedures for permitting certain sources in relation to the
Forest County Potawatomi Community Class I Area.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the
Wisconsin Administrative Code are incorporated by reference:
(A) NR 400.02 Definitions. NR 400.02(66m) ``Forest County
Potawatomi Community Class I area'' or ``FCPC Class I area'' as
published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register November 2010, No.
659, effective December 1, 2010.
(B) NR 405.19 Forest County Potawatomi Class I area, as published
in the Wisconsin Administrative Register November 2010, No. 659,
effective December 1, 2010.
(C) NR 406.08 Action on permit applications. NR 406.08(4)(a) and
(4)(b) as published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register November
2010, No. 659, effective December 1, 2010.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-19138 Filed 8-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P