Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Applications for Food and Drug Administration Approval To Market a New Drug; Revision of Postmarketing Reporting Requirements-Discontinuance, 45619-45621 [2012-18771]
Download as PDF
45619
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Notices
during Phase 2 will also be used to
assess the differences in services used
between families who receive home
visiting and a comparison group.
Respondents: Respondents in Phase 2
will include parents and children who
are enrolled in the study. Data
collection activities will take place over
a three-year period.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Annual
number of
respondents
Instrument
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Total annual
burden hours
Survey of parents in the study ........................................................................
Observed parent-child interactions ..................................................................
Direct assessments of children .......................................................................
Collecting saliva to measure cotinine ..............................................................
1360
2720
2720
2720
1
1
1
1
1.0
0.5
0.7
0.1
1360
1360
1904
272
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours .....................................................
........................
........................
........................
4896
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research
and Evaluation, 370 L’Enfant
Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447,
Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer.
Email address:
OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All
requests should be identified by the title
of the information collection.
The Department specifically requests
comments on (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Steven M. Hanmer,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–18702 Filed 7–31–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–22–M
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Jul 31, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0813]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Applications for
Food and Drug Administration
Approval To Market a New Drug;
Revision of Postmarketing Reporting
Requirements—Discontinuance
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal Agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the reporting requirements contained in
FDA’s regulations on postmarketing
reporting of information pertaining to
drug shortages.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the collection of
information by October 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juanmanuel Vilela, Office of
Information Management, Food and
Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–
796–7651,
juanmanuel.vilela@fda.hhs.gov.
Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information
[,including each proposed [extension/
reinstatement] of an existing collection
of information,] before submitting the
collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, FDA is
publishing notice of the proposed
collection of information set forth in
this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
45620
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Applications for Food and Drug
Administration Approval To Market a
New Drug; Revision of Postmarketing
Reporting Requirements—
Discontinuance (OMB Control Number
0910–0699)—Extension
FDA published an interim final rule
on December 19, 2011 (76 FR 78530)
amending its postmarketing reporting
regulations implementing certain
provisions of the Federal Food, Drug
and Cosmetic Act. The provisions of the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
require manufacturers who are the sole
manufacturers of certain drug products
to notify FDA at least 6 months before
discontinuance of manufacture of the
products. The interim final rule
modified the term ‘‘discontinuance’’
and clarified the term ‘‘sole
manufacturer’’ with respect to
notification of discontinuance
requirements. The broader reporting
resulting from these changes will enable
FDA to improve its collection and
distribution of drug shortage
information to physician and patient
organizations and to work with
manufacturers and other stakeholders to
respond to potential drug shortages.
Sections 314.81(b)(3)(iii) and 314.91
of FDA’s regulations implement section
506C of the Federal Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act. Section 314.81(b)(3)(iii)
requires entities who are the sole
manufacturers of certain drug products
to notify us at least 6 months before
discontinuance of manufacture of the
product. For the regulations to apply, a
product must meet the following three
criteria:
1. The product must be life
supporting, life sustaining, or intended
for use in the prevention of a
debilitating disease or condition;
2. The product must have been
approved by FDA under section 505(b)
or 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act; and
3. The product must not have been
originally derived from human tissue
and replaced by a recombinant product.
Under § 314.81(b)(3)(iii)(c), FDA will
publicly disclose information about
drug products subject to section 506C
that are to be discontinued. Section
314.91 allows us to reduce the 6-month
notification period if we find that good
cause exists for the reduction. A
manufacturer may request that we
reduce the notification period by
certifying that good cause for the
reduction exists.
FDA added §§ 314.81(b)(3)(iii) and
314.91 to its regulations in the Federal
Register of October 18, 2007 (72 FR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Jul 31, 2012
Jkt 226001
58993). Sections 314.81(b)(3)(iii) and
314.91 require two new reporting
requirements to FDA that are subject to
OMB approval under the PRA:
Notification of Discontinuance and
Certification of Good Cause. The
December 19, 2011, interim final rule
added two new definitions to
§ 314.81(b)(3)(iii): ‘‘Discontinuance’’
and ‘‘sole manufacturer.’’ The interim
final rule clarified the scope of
manufacturers required to report and
expanded the range of circumstances
required to be reported to the Agency
under § 314.81(b)(3)(iii), but did not
change the substantive content of the
reports required to be submitted to the
Agency. This PRA analysis covers the
information collection resulting from
the October 18, 2007, final rule and also
includes estimates of how the number of
Notifications of Discontinuance and
Certifications of Good Cause may
increase as a result of the interim final
rule.
A. Notification of Discontinuance
Under § 314.81(b)(3)(iii), at least 6
months before a sole manufacturer
intends to discontinue manufacture of a
drug product subject to section 506C,
the manufacturer must send us
notification of the discontinuance. The
notification of discontinuance generally
contains the name of the manufacturer,
the name of the product to be
discontinued, the reason for the
discontinuance, and the date of
discontinuance. FDA will work with
relevant manufacturers during the 6month notification period to help
minimize the effect of the
discontinuance on patients and health
care providers, and to distribute
appropriate information about the
discontinuance to physician and patient
organizations. The interim final rule
added definitions of ‘‘discontinuance’’
and ‘‘sole manufacturer’’ to
§ 314.81(b)(3)(iii). The inclusion of these
definitions expands notification
requirements under § 314.81(b)(3)(iii) to
additional discontinuance
circumstances and clarifies the scope of
manufacturers who must report
discontinuances. The interim final rule
also required that notifications of
discontinuance be submitted either
electronically or by telephone according
to instructions on FDA’s Drug Shortage
Web site at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/
DrugSafety/DrugShortages. This change
ensures that the appropriate offices are
timely notified of all relevant
discontinuances. It also reflects existing
practice for submitting notices of
discontinuance, and reduces the burden
on industry to submit multiple copies of
the notification.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
B. Certification of Good Cause
FDA may reduce the 6-month
notification period if we find good cause
for the reduction. As described in
§ 314.91, a manufacturer can request a
reduction in the notification period by
submitting written certification that
good cause exists to the following
designated offices: (1) The CDER Drug
Shortage Coordinator at the address of
the Director of CDER; (2) the CDER Drug
Registration and Listing Team, Division
of Compliance Risk Management and
Surveillance in CDER; and (3) the
director of either the CDER division or
the CBER office that is responsible for
reviewing the application. The
following circumstances may establish
good cause:
• A public health problem may result
from continuation of manufacturing for
the 6-month period (§ 314.91(d)(1));
• A biomaterials shortage prevents
the continuation of manufacturing for
the 6-month period (§ 314.91(d)(2));
• A liability problem may exist for
the manufacturer if the manufacturing is
continued for the 6-month period
(§ 314.91(d)(3));
• Continuation of the manufacturing
for the 6-month period may cause
substantial economic hardship for the
manufacturer (§ 314.91(d)(4));
• The manufacturer has filed for
bankruptcy under chapter 7 or 11 of title
11, United States Code (§ 314.91(d)(5));
• The manufacturer can stop making
the product but still distribute it to
satisfy existing market need for 6
months (§ 314.91(d)(6)); or
• Other good cause exists for a
reduction in the notification period
(§ 314.91(d)(7)).
With each certification described
previously, the manufacturer must
describe in detail the basis for its
conclusion that such circumstances
exist. We require that the written
certification that good cause exists be
submitted to the offices identified
previously to ensure that our efforts to
address the discontinuance take place in
a timely manner. The interim final rule
made no changes to the requirements or
process for certification of good cause.
Description of Respondents: An
applicant that is the sole manufacturer
and who is discontinuing manufacture
of a drug product that meets the
following criteria: (1) Is life supporting,
life sustaining, or intended for use in
the prevention of a debilitating disease
or condition; (2) was approved by FDA
under section 505(b) or (j) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and (3)
was not originally derived from human
tissue and replaced by a recombinant
product.
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
45621
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 1, 2012 / Notices
Burden Estimate: The table below
provides an estimate of the annual
reporting burden for notification of a
product discontinuance and
certification of good cause under
§§ 314.81(b)(3)(iii) and 314.91, as
amended by the interim final rule.
Notification of Discontinuance: Based
on data collected from the CDER Drug
Shortage Coordinator since December
17, 2007, when §§ 314.81(b)(3)(iii) and
314.91 went into effect, one
manufacturer during each year reported
to FDA a discontinuance of one drug
product meeting the criteria of section
506C and its implementing regulations
(i.e., the drug product was approved
under section 505(b) or (j) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the drug
product was ‘‘life-supporting, lifesustaining or intended for use in the
prevention of a debilitating disease or
condition,’’ the drug product was
produced by a sole manufacturer, and
the drug product was permanently
discontinued). CDER’s Drug Shortages
Coordinator tracked 220 drug shortages
between January and October of 2011.
The Agency estimates that 30 percent
(66) of these shortages would relate to
discontinuances subject to mandatory
reporting under section 506C as a result
of the interim final rule. Adjusting to
include an additional two months of
reporting (November and December), we
estimate that FDA will receive a total of
80 notifications of a discontinuance per
year under section 506C, as amended by
the interim final rule. Based on
experience, a manufacturer submits
only one notification of a
discontinuance per year, thus the total
number of manufacturers who would be
required to notify us of a discontinuance
would be 80. Therefore, the number of
respondents is estimated to be 80. The
hours per response is the estimated
number of hours that a respondent
would spend preparing the information
to be submitted with a notification of
product discontinuance, including the
time it takes to gather and copy the
statement. Based on experience in
working with manufacturers to submit
notifications under § 314.81(b)(3)(iii),
we estimate that approximately 2 hours
on average are needed per response. We
do not expect the changes in the interim
final rule to affect the number of hours
per response. Therefore, we estimate
that respondents will spend 160 hours
per year notifying us of a product
discontinuance under these regulations.
Certification of Good Cause: Based on
data collected from the CDER drug
shortage coordinator since 2007, one
manufacturer each year reported a
discontinuance of one drug product
under section 506C and its
implementing regulations. Each
manufacturer has the opportunity under
§ 314.91 to request a reduction in the 6month notification period by certifying
to us that good cause exists for the
reduction. The Agency has received no
certifications of good cause since 2007.
Although we expect we will receive an
increase in the number of reports of
discontinuances as a result of the
changes in the interim final rule,
because of the limited circumstances
under which good cause can be
requested or would be appropriately
granted, we do not expect a
correspondingly large increase in the
number of manufacturers requesting a
certification of good cause. We estimate
that only 5 manufacturers will request a
certification of good cause each year.
Therefore, the number of respondents is
estimated to be 5. The total annual
responses are the total number of
certifications of good cause that are
expected to be submitted to us in a year.
We estimate that the total annual
responses will remain small, averaging
one response per respondent. The hours
per response is the estimated number of
hours that a respondent spends
preparing the detailed information
certifying that good cause exists for a
reduction in the notification period,
including the time it takes to gather and
copy the documents. We estimate that
approximately 16 hours on average are
needed per response. Therefore, we
estimate that 80 hours will be spent per
year by respondents certifying that good
cause exists for a reduction in the 6month notification period under
§ 314.91.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
21 CFR section
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average
burden per
response
Total hours
Notification of Discontinuance (314.81(b)(3)(iii) ..................
Certification of Good Cause (314.91) ..................................
80
5
1
1
80
5
2
16
160
80
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
240
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Dated: July 27, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–18771 Filed 7–31–12; 8:45 am]
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0776]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Announcement of Office of
Management and Budget Approval;
Reclassification Petitions for Medical
Devices
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Jul 31, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that a collection of information entitled
‘‘Reclassification Petitions for Medical
Devices’’ has been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Gittleson, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–
400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–
5156, Daniel.Gittleson@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
29, 2012, the Agency submitted a
proposed collection of information
entitled ‘‘Reclassification Petitions for
Medical Devices’’ to OMB for review
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45619-45621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18771]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0813]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Applications for Food and Drug Administration Approval
To Market a New Drug; Revision of Postmarketing Reporting
Requirements--Discontinuance
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the reporting requirements
contained in FDA's regulations on postmarketing reporting of
information pertaining to drug shortages.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by October 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanmanuel Vilela, Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-7651,
juanmanuel.vilela@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information [,including
each proposed [extension/reinstatement] of an existing collection of
information,] before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed
collection of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques,
[[Page 45620]]
when appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Applications for Food and Drug Administration Approval To Market a New
Drug; Revision of Postmarketing Reporting Requirements--Discontinuance
(OMB Control Number 0910-0699)--Extension
FDA published an interim final rule on December 19, 2011 (76 FR
78530) amending its postmarketing reporting regulations implementing
certain provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The
provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act require
manufacturers who are the sole manufacturers of certain drug products
to notify FDA at least 6 months before discontinuance of manufacture of
the products. The interim final rule modified the term
``discontinuance'' and clarified the term ``sole manufacturer'' with
respect to notification of discontinuance requirements. The broader
reporting resulting from these changes will enable FDA to improve its
collection and distribution of drug shortage information to physician
and patient organizations and to work with manufacturers and other
stakeholders to respond to potential drug shortages.
Sections 314.81(b)(3)(iii) and 314.91 of FDA's regulations
implement section 506C of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
Section 314.81(b)(3)(iii) requires entities who are the sole
manufacturers of certain drug products to notify us at least 6 months
before discontinuance of manufacture of the product. For the
regulations to apply, a product must meet the following three criteria:
1. The product must be life supporting, life sustaining, or
intended for use in the prevention of a debilitating disease or
condition;
2. The product must have been approved by FDA under section 505(b)
or 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and
3. The product must not have been originally derived from human
tissue and replaced by a recombinant product.
Under Sec. 314.81(b)(3)(iii)(c), FDA will publicly disclose
information about drug products subject to section 506C that are to be
discontinued. Section 314.91 allows us to reduce the 6-month
notification period if we find that good cause exists for the
reduction. A manufacturer may request that we reduce the notification
period by certifying that good cause for the reduction exists.
FDA added Sec. Sec. 314.81(b)(3)(iii) and 314.91 to its
regulations in the Federal Register of October 18, 2007 (72 FR 58993).
Sections 314.81(b)(3)(iii) and 314.91 require two new reporting
requirements to FDA that are subject to OMB approval under the PRA:
Notification of Discontinuance and Certification of Good Cause. The
December 19, 2011, interim final rule added two new definitions to
Sec. 314.81(b)(3)(iii): ``Discontinuance'' and ``sole manufacturer.''
The interim final rule clarified the scope of manufacturers required to
report and expanded the range of circumstances required to be reported
to the Agency under Sec. 314.81(b)(3)(iii), but did not change the
substantive content of the reports required to be submitted to the
Agency. This PRA analysis covers the information collection resulting
from the October 18, 2007, final rule and also includes estimates of
how the number of Notifications of Discontinuance and Certifications of
Good Cause may increase as a result of the interim final rule.
A. Notification of Discontinuance
Under Sec. 314.81(b)(3)(iii), at least 6 months before a sole
manufacturer intends to discontinue manufacture of a drug product
subject to section 506C, the manufacturer must send us notification of
the discontinuance. The notification of discontinuance generally
contains the name of the manufacturer, the name of the product to be
discontinued, the reason for the discontinuance, and the date of
discontinuance. FDA will work with relevant manufacturers during the 6-
month notification period to help minimize the effect of the
discontinuance on patients and health care providers, and to distribute
appropriate information about the discontinuance to physician and
patient organizations. The interim final rule added definitions of
``discontinuance'' and ``sole manufacturer'' to Sec.
314.81(b)(3)(iii). The inclusion of these definitions expands
notification requirements under Sec. 314.81(b)(3)(iii) to additional
discontinuance circumstances and clarifies the scope of manufacturers
who must report discontinuances. The interim final rule also required
that notifications of discontinuance be submitted either electronically
or by telephone according to instructions on FDA's Drug Shortage Web
site at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/DrugShortages. This change
ensures that the appropriate offices are timely notified of all
relevant discontinuances. It also reflects existing practice for
submitting notices of discontinuance, and reduces the burden on
industry to submit multiple copies of the notification.
B. Certification of Good Cause
FDA may reduce the 6-month notification period if we find good
cause for the reduction. As described in Sec. 314.91, a manufacturer
can request a reduction in the notification period by submitting
written certification that good cause exists to the following
designated offices: (1) The CDER Drug Shortage Coordinator at the
address of the Director of CDER; (2) the CDER Drug Registration and
Listing Team, Division of Compliance Risk Management and Surveillance
in CDER; and (3) the director of either the CDER division or the CBER
office that is responsible for reviewing the application. The following
circumstances may establish good cause:
A public health problem may result from continuation of
manufacturing for the 6-month period (Sec. 314.91(d)(1));
A biomaterials shortage prevents the continuation of
manufacturing for the 6-month period (Sec. 314.91(d)(2));
A liability problem may exist for the manufacturer if the
manufacturing is continued for the 6-month period (Sec. 314.91(d)(3));
Continuation of the manufacturing for the 6-month period
may cause substantial economic hardship for the manufacturer (Sec.
314.91(d)(4));
The manufacturer has filed for bankruptcy under chapter 7
or 11 of title 11, United States Code (Sec. 314.91(d)(5));
The manufacturer can stop making the product but still
distribute it to satisfy existing market need for 6 months (Sec.
314.91(d)(6)); or
Other good cause exists for a reduction in the
notification period (Sec. 314.91(d)(7)).
With each certification described previously, the manufacturer must
describe in detail the basis for its conclusion that such circumstances
exist. We require that the written certification that good cause exists
be submitted to the offices identified previously to ensure that our
efforts to address the discontinuance take place in a timely manner.
The interim final rule made no changes to the requirements or process
for certification of good cause.
Description of Respondents: An applicant that is the sole
manufacturer and who is discontinuing manufacture of a drug product
that meets the following criteria: (1) Is life supporting, life
sustaining, or intended for use in the prevention of a debilitating
disease or condition; (2) was approved by FDA under section 505(b) or
(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and (3) was not
originally derived from human tissue and replaced by a recombinant
product.
[[Page 45621]]
Burden Estimate: The table below provides an estimate of the annual
reporting burden for notification of a product discontinuance and
certification of good cause under Sec. Sec. 314.81(b)(3)(iii) and
314.91, as amended by the interim final rule.
Notification of Discontinuance: Based on data collected from the
CDER Drug Shortage Coordinator since December 17, 2007, when Sec. Sec.
314.81(b)(3)(iii) and 314.91 went into effect, one manufacturer during
each year reported to FDA a discontinuance of one drug product meeting
the criteria of section 506C and its implementing regulations (i.e.,
the drug product was approved under section 505(b) or (j) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the drug product was ``life-
supporting, life-sustaining or intended for use in the prevention of a
debilitating disease or condition,'' the drug product was produced by a
sole manufacturer, and the drug product was permanently discontinued).
CDER's Drug Shortages Coordinator tracked 220 drug shortages between
January and October of 2011. The Agency estimates that 30 percent (66)
of these shortages would relate to discontinuances subject to mandatory
reporting under section 506C as a result of the interim final rule.
Adjusting to include an additional two months of reporting (November
and December), we estimate that FDA will receive a total of 80
notifications of a discontinuance per year under section 506C, as
amended by the interim final rule. Based on experience, a manufacturer
submits only one notification of a discontinuance per year, thus the
total number of manufacturers who would be required to notify us of a
discontinuance would be 80. Therefore, the number of respondents is
estimated to be 80. The hours per response is the estimated number of
hours that a respondent would spend preparing the information to be
submitted with a notification of product discontinuance, including the
time it takes to gather and copy the statement. Based on experience in
working with manufacturers to submit notifications under Sec.
314.81(b)(3)(iii), we estimate that approximately 2 hours on average
are needed per response. We do not expect the changes in the interim
final rule to affect the number of hours per response. Therefore, we
estimate that respondents will spend 160 hours per year notifying us of
a product discontinuance under these regulations.
Certification of Good Cause: Based on data collected from the CDER
drug shortage coordinator since 2007, one manufacturer each year
reported a discontinuance of one drug product under section 506C and
its implementing regulations. Each manufacturer has the opportunity
under Sec. 314.91 to request a reduction in the 6-month notification
period by certifying to us that good cause exists for the reduction.
The Agency has received no certifications of good cause since 2007.
Although we expect we will receive an increase in the number of reports
of discontinuances as a result of the changes in the interim final
rule, because of the limited circumstances under which good cause can
be requested or would be appropriately granted, we do not expect a
correspondingly large increase in the number of manufacturers
requesting a certification of good cause. We estimate that only 5
manufacturers will request a certification of good cause each year.
Therefore, the number of respondents is estimated to be 5. The total
annual responses are the total number of certifications of good cause
that are expected to be submitted to us in a year. We estimate that the
total annual responses will remain small, averaging one response per
respondent. The hours per response is the estimated number of hours
that a respondent spends preparing the detailed information certifying
that good cause exists for a reduction in the notification period,
including the time it takes to gather and copy the documents. We
estimate that approximately 16 hours on average are needed per
response. Therefore, we estimate that 80 hours will be spent per year
by respondents certifying that good cause exists for a reduction in the
6-month notification period under Sec. 314.91.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
21 CFR section Number of responses per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent responses per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification of Discontinuance 80 1 80 2 160
(314.81(b)(3)(iii).............
Certification of Good Cause 5 1 5 16 80
(314.91).......................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 240
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Dated: July 27, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-18771 Filed 7-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P