Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order, 44593-44595 [2012-18459]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2012 / Notices
and efficient data collection for
management of Atlantic HMS.
In order to give sufficient time for
dealers to adjust to implementation of
the new system and the additional
requirements, we proposed delaying
implementation of the new HMS
electronic reporting system for all
federally-permitted HMS dealers until
2013. Additionally, we decided to
conduct outreach to HMS dealers to
train them how to use the new system
and help ease the transition from the
current paper format to the new HMS
electronic reporting system. On
December 14, 2011, we conducted an
initial training workshop for HMS
dealers in St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. On June
29, 2012, we announced the date and
location for nine upcoming workshops
in the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Atlantic area to introduce the new
reporting system to HMS dealers. In this
notice, we announce the date and
location for an additional training
workshop in St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. Future
training workshops will be held
throughout the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic
and Southeast regions at a later date and
will be announced in a future notice.
These workshops will be physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Delisse Ortiz at
(301) 425–8503, or Jackie Wilson at
(240) 338–3936, at least 7 days prior to
the workshop date. The public is
reminded that NMFS expects
participants at the workshop to conduct
themselves appropriately. At the
beginning of the workshop, a
representative of NMFS will explain the
ground rules (e.g., alcohol is prohibited
from the hearing room; each attendee
will have an opportunity to ask
questions; and attendees should not
interrupt one another). Attendees are
expected to respect the ground rules; if
they do not, they will be asked to leave
the workshop.
Authority: 16 U.S.C, 1801 et seq.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
[CPSC Docket No. 12–C0008]
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse
Corporation, Provisional Acceptance
of a Settlement Agreement and Order
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
It is the policy of the
Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the
Consumer Product Safety Act in the
Federal Register in accordance with the
terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published
below is a provisionally accepted
Settlement Agreement with Burlington
Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation,
containing a civil penalty of
$1,500,000.00, within twenty (20) days
of service of the Commission’s final
Order accepting the Settlement
Agreement.
DATES: Any interested person may ask
the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its
contents by filing a written request with
the Office of the Secretary by August 14,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to
comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the
Comment 12–C0008, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–
4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seth
B. Popkin, Lead Trial Attorney, Division
of Compliance, Office of the General
Counsel, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408;
telephone (301) 504–7612.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the Agreement and Order appears
below.
SUMMARY:
Dated: July 25, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dated: July 25, 2012.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–18534 Filed 7–27–12; 8:45 am]
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
In the Matter of Burlington Coat Factory
Warehouse Corporation
CPSC Docket No. 12–C0008
Settlement Agreement
1. In accordance with the Consumer
Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2051–
2089 (‘‘CPSA’’), and 16 CFR § 1118.20,
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse
Corporation (‘‘Burlington’’) and staff
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:34 Jul 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44593
(‘‘Staff’’) of the U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
enter into this Settlement Agreement
(‘‘Agreement’’). The Agreement and the
incorporated attached Order (‘‘Order’’)
resolve Staff’s allegations set forth
below.
Parties
2. Staff is staff of the Commission, an
independent federal regulatory agency
established pursuant to, and responsible
for the enforcement of, the CPSA.
3. Burlington is a corporation,
organized and existing under the laws of
Delaware, with its principal offices
located in Burlington, New Jersey.
Staff Allegations
4. On multiple occasions and during
various periods from November 2003 to
January 2012, Burlington and its
subsidiaries sold and/or held for sale
various styles, models, and quantities of
children’s upper outerwear products
with drawstrings at the neck, including,
but not limited to, the following: Liberty
Apparel Company, Inc.—Jewel hooded
sweatshirts; Jason Evans Associates,
LLC—Bay Trading hooded sweatshirts
and jackets; Koman Sportswear
Manufacturing Corporation—hooded
sweatshirts and jackets; Fashion
Options, Inc.—Beverly Hills Polo Club
hooded sweatshirts; Allura Imports,
Inc.—Major Diva hooded sweatshirts;
Baycreek, Inc.—Attitude Gold hooded
sweatshirts; Franshaw, Inc.—Blue Heart
and Just a Girl hooded sweatshirts;
Bobens Trading Company, Inc.—Old
Skool hooded sweatshirts; Weeplay
Kids, LLC—Candy Queen and AKDMKS
hooded sweatshirts; Ten West Apparel,
Inc.—hooded jackets; Brand Evolution
LLC—All Over Locks, All Over Skaters,
and Rock Mask Hoody hooded
sweatshirts; Regaliti, Inc.—Betty Blue
hooded jackets; Byer California—
jackets; Haselson International Trading,
Inc.—Kani Gold and Roadblock hooded
sweatshirts; Bubblegum USA—hooded
jackets; North-Sportif, Inc.—hooded
jackets; Five Star Apparel—hooded
jackets; Trendset Originals LLC—
Shampoo hooded jackets; Hind
Fashions, Inc.—Hind leather and Lil
Phat hooded jackets; Lollytogs, Ltd.—
Rim Rocka hooded sweatshirts; S.
Rothschild & Company, Inc.—wool
coats; AJS Group LLC—Apple Bottom
hooded jackets; Millennium Apparel
Group Inc.—Disney Winnie the Pooh
hooded jackets; and Winco USA, Inc.—
Sergio Benini hooded jackets. The
products identified in this paragraph are
collectively referred to herein as
‘‘Garments.’’
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
44594
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2012 / Notices
5. Burlington sold the Garments, and/
or held the Garments for sale, to
consumers.
6. The Garments are ‘‘consumer
product[s],’’ and, at all relevant times,
Burlington was a ‘‘retailer’’ of those
consumer products, which were
‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as those
terms are defined in CPSA sections
3(a)(5), (8), and (13), 15 U.S.C.
§ 2052(a)(5), (8), and (13).
7. In February 1996, Staff issued the
Guidelines for Drawstrings on
Children’s Upper Outerwear
(‘‘Guidelines’’) to help prevent children
from strangling or entangling on neck
and waist drawstrings. The Guidelines
state that drawstrings can cause, and
have caused, injuries and deaths when
they catch on items such as playground
equipment, bus doors, or cribs. In the
Guidelines, Staff recommends that no
children’s upper outerwear in sizes 2T
to 12 be manufactured or sold to
consumers with hood and neck
drawstrings.
8. In June 1997, ASTM adopted a
voluntary standard (ASTM F1816–97)
incorporating the Guidelines. The
Guidelines state that firms should be
aware of the hazards associated with
drawstrings and should ensure that
garments they sell conform to the
voluntary standard.
9. On May 19, 2006, the Commission
posted on its Web site a letter from the
Commission’s Director of the Office of
Compliance to manufacturers,
importers, and retailers of children’s
upper outerwear. The letter urges them
to make certain that all children’s upper
outerwear sold in the United States
complies with ASTM F1816–97. The
letter states that Staff considers
children’s upper outerwear with
drawstrings at the hood or neck area to
be defective and to present a substantial
risk of injury to young children under
Federal Hazardous Substances Act
(‘‘FHSA’’) section 15(c), 15 U.S.C.
§ 1274(c). The letter also references the
CPSA’s section 15(b) (15 U.S.C.
§ 2064(b)) reporting requirements.
10. Staff provided Burlington with
multiple direct notifications of the
hazards associated with drawstrings on
children’s upper outerwear.
11. Burlington’s distribution in
commerce of the Garments did not
comply with the Guidelines or ASTM
F1816–97, failed to comport with Staff’s
May 2006 defect notice, and posed
strangulation hazards to children.
12. Burlington informed the
Commission that there had been no
reported incidents or injuries associated
with the Garments.
13. The Commission, in cooperation
with Burlington and/or other firms that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:34 Jul 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
were the Garments’ manufacturers,
importers, or distributors, announced
recalls of the Garments.
14. Based in part on information
available through the sources set forth
in paragraphs 7 through 10, Burlington
had presumed and actual knowledge
that the Garments distributed in
commerce posed strangulation hazards
and presented substantial risks of injury
to children under FHSA section
15(c)(1), 15 U.S.C. § 1274(c)(1).
Burlington obtained information that
reasonably supported the conclusion
that the Garments contained defects that
could create substantial product hazards
or that the Garments created
unreasonable risks of serious injury or
death. Pursuant to CPSA sections
15(b)(3) and (4), 15 U.S.C. § 2064(b)(3)
and (4), Burlington was required to
inform the Commission immediately of
these defects and risks.
15. Burlington knowingly and
repeatedly failed to inform the
Commission immediately about the
Garments, as required by CPSA sections
15(b)(3) and (4), 15 U.S.C. § 2064(b)(3)
and (4), and as the term ‘‘knowingly’’ is
defined in CPSA section 20(d), 15
U.S.C. § 2069(d). These knowing failures
violated CPSA section 19(a)(4), 15
U.S.C. § 2068(a)(4). Pursuant to CPSA
section 20, 15 U.S.C. § 2069, these
knowing failures subjected Burlington
to civil penalties.
16. On repeated occasions from in or
about September 2008 to January 2012,
Burlington offered Garments for sale,
sold Garments, and/or otherwise
distributed Garments in commerce that
were subject to voluntary corrective
actions taken by the Garments’
manufacturers in consultation with the
Commission. The Commission had
notified the public of those voluntary
corrective actions.
17. Burlington knowingly engaged in
the acts alleged in paragraph 16, as the
term ‘‘knowingly’’ is defined in CPSA
section 20(d), 15 U.S.C. § 2069(d). These
knowing acts violated CPSA section
19(a)(2)(B), 15 U.S.C. § 2068(a)(2)(B).
Pursuant to CPSA section 20, 15 U.S.C.
§ 2069, these knowing acts subjected
Burlington to civil penalties.
18. Staff denies and/or does not
concur with Burlington’s responsive
allegations below.
Burlington Responsive Allegations
19. Burlington denies Staff’s
allegations above, including but not
limited to any claim that Burlington
failed to timely report to the
Commission the sale or distribution of
any children’s upper outerwear
products with drawstrings pursuant to
§ 15(b) of the CPSA, or that Burlington
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
knowingly offered Garments for sale,
knowingly sold Garments, and/or
otherwise knowingly distributed
Garments in commerce that were subject
to voluntary corrective actions.
20. Burlington enters into the
Agreement to settle this matter without
the expense of litigation. Burlington
enters into the Agreement and agrees to
pay the amount referenced below in
compromise of disputed and unproven
allegations. Burlington’s entering into
the Agreement is not an admission of
liability of any kind, whether legal or
factual.
21. Burlington did not manufacture
the Garments. It purchased them from
vendors and other suppliers. Consistent
with practice in the retail industry,
Burlington contractually required the
Garment vendors to supply products
that complied with all federal, state, and
local laws, regulations, and standards,
and relied on its suppliers to provide
compliant products, as the suppliers
were in the best position to know and
understand the many legal requirements
that were or potentially were applicable
to their products.
22. Since the Commission first issued
the Guidelines in 1996, Burlington’s
children’s apparel purchasing policy
has prohibited Burlington’s apparel
buyers from purchasing children’s
upper outerwear with drawstrings. Prior
to 2009, Burlington’s management had
procedures in place that it reasonably
believed prevented the purchase of
children’s upper outerwear products
with drawstrings. Upon learning in 2009
that, despite such procedures, certain
Garments had been discovered in
Burlington’s stores, Burlington
undertook an extensive manual audit of
all children’s upper outerwear in all of
its stores to determine whether it had
unknowingly purchased other products
subject to the Guidelines. This audit
was a massive undertaking, as
Burlington’s personnel in all of its
approximately 450 stores at that time
had to visually inspect all items of
children’s upper outerwear, and the
Guidelines and ASTM standard contain
ambiguities that made it difficult to
determine whether certain items failed
to comply.
23. Prior to the audit, Burlington’s
product compliance and safety
personnel and children’s apparel buyers
had no knowledge, whether actual or
constructive, that the Garments actually
supplied by Burlington’s suppliers
contained drawstrings. Burlington
promptly notified the Commission
pursuant to § 15(b) of the CPSA upon
discovering as a result of the audit that
it had purchased and sold many of the
Garments.
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24. Burlington is unaware of any
incidents or injuries associated with the
Garments.
Agreement of the Parties
25. Under the CPSA, the Commission
has jurisdiction over this matter and
over Burlington.
26. The parties enter into the
Agreement for settlement purposes only.
The Agreement does not constitute an
admission by Burlington, or a
determination by the Commission, that
Burlington knowingly violated the
CPSA.
27. The Agreement is a full and
complete resolution between Staff and
Burlington, and its parents,
shareholders, divisions, subdivisions,
subsidiaries, partners, sister companies
and their successors and assigns of all
claims for civil penalties that have been
or could have been asserted based on
the facts contained in Staff’s allegations
above, with regard to the failure to
report the Garments or sale of the
Garments after corrective action.
28. In settlement of Staff’s allegations,
Burlington shall pay a civil penalty in
the amount of one million five hundred
thousand dollars ($1,500,000.00). The
civil penalty shall be paid within
twenty (20) calendar days of service of
the Commission’s final Order accepting
the Agreement. The payment shall be
made via www.pay.gov.
29. Burlington agrees that it will not
seek or accept, directly or indirectly,
indemnification, reimbursement,
insurance, or any other form of
compensation or payment, including,
but not limited to, cash, account credit,
or set-off, from any vendor or supplier
from which Burlington acquired the
Garments, or from any other firm or
person, for the civil penalty that
Burlington agrees and is ordered to pay
pursuant to the Agreement and Order.
30. Upon provisional acceptance of
the Agreement, the Agreement shall be
placed on the public record and
published in the Federal Register, in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in 16 C.F.R. § 1118.20(e). In
accordance with 16 C.F.R. § 1118.20(f),
if within fifteen (15) calendar days, the
Commission does not receive any
written request not to accept the
Agreement, the Agreement shall be
deemed finally accepted on the
sixteenth (16th) calendar day after the
date it is published in the Federal
Register.
31. Upon the Commission’s final
acceptance of the Agreement and
issuance of the final Order, Burlington
knowingly, voluntarily, and completely
waives any rights it may have in this
matter to the following: (1) An
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:34 Jul 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
administrative or judicial hearing; (2)
judicial review or other challenge or
contest of the validity of the Order or of
the Commission’s actions; (3) a
determination by the Commission of
whether Burlington failed to comply
with the CPSA and its underlying
regulations; (4) a statement of findings
of fact and conclusions of law; and (5)
any claims under the Equal Access to
Justice Act.
32. The Commission may publicize
the terms of the Agreement and the
Order.
33. The Agreement and the Order
shall apply to, and be binding upon,
Burlington and each of its successors
and assigns.
34. The Commission issues the Order
under the provisions of the CPSA, and
a violation of the Order may subject
Burlington and each of its successors
and assigns to appropriate legal action.
35. The Agreement may be used in
interpreting the Order. Understandings,
agreements, representations, or
interpretations apart from those
contained in the Agreement and the
Order may not be used to vary or
contradict their terms. The Agreement
shall not be waived, amended,
modified, or otherwise altered without
written agreement thereto executed by
the party against whom such waiver,
amendment, modification, or alteration
is sought to be enforced. The Agreement
may be executed in counterparts.
36. If any provision of the Agreement
and the Order is held to be illegal,
invalid, or unenforceable under present
or future laws effective during the terms
of the Agreement and the Order, such
provision shall be fully severable. The
balance of the Agreement and the Order
shall remain in full force and effect,
unless the Commission and Burlington
agree that severing the provision
materially affects the purpose of the
Agreement and the Order.
44595
General Counsel.
Mary B. Murphy,
Assistant General Counsel, Office of the
General Counsel.
Dated: July 12, 2012
By: lllllllllllllllllll
Seth B. Popkin,
Lead Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance,
Office of the General Counsel.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
In the Matter of Burlington Coat Factory
Warehouse Corporation
CPSC Docket No. 12–C0008
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Settlement
Agreement entered into between
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse
Corporation (‘‘Burlington’’) and U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) staff, and the
Commission having jurisdiction over
the subject matter and over Burlington,
and it appearing that the Settlement
Agreement and the Order are in the
public interest, it is
Ordered, that the Settlement
Agreement be, and hereby is, accepted;
and it is
Further ordered, that Burlington shall
pay a civil penalty in the amount of one
million five hundred thousand dollars
($1,500,000.00) within twenty (20)
calendar days of service of the
Commission’s final Order accepting the
Agreement. The payment shall be made
via www.pay.gov. Upon the failure of
Burlington to make the foregoing
payment when due, interest on the
unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid
by Burlington at the federal legal rate of
interest set forth at 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a)
and (b).
Provisionally accepted and
provisional Order issued on the 25th
day of July, 2012.
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse
By Order of the Commission:
Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllll
Dated: June 29, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
By: lllllllllllllllllll
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Paul Tang,
Commission.
Executive Vice President and General
[FR Doc. 2012–18459 Filed 7–27–12; 8:45 am]
Counsel, 1830 Route 130, Burlington, NJ
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
08016.
Dated: July 3, 2012.
By: lllllllllllllllllll DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Jeffrey B. Margulies, Esq.
William L. Troutman, Esq.
Application for New Awards; Charter
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., 555 South
Schools Program (CSP)—Charter
Flower Street, 41st Floor, Los Angeles, CA
School Exemplary Collaboration
90071.
Awards
Counsel—Burlington Coat Factory
Warehouse Corporation.
AGENCY: Office of Innovation and
U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Improvement, Department of Education.
Commission Staff.
ACTION: Notice.
Cheryl A. Falvey,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM
30JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44593-44595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18459]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 12-C0008]
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Provisional
Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in
the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e).
Published below is a provisionally accepted Settlement Agreement with
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, containing a civil
penalty of $1,500,000.00, within twenty (20) days of service of the
Commission's final Order accepting the Settlement Agreement.
DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written
request with the Office of the Secretary by August 14, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the Comment 12-C0008, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seth B. Popkin, Lead Trial Attorney,
Division of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-
4408; telephone (301) 504-7612.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears
below.
Dated: July 25, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
In the Matter of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation
CPSC Docket No. 12-C0008
Settlement Agreement
1. In accordance with the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C.
Sec. Sec. 2051-2089 (``CPSA''), and 16 CFR Sec. 1118.20, Burlington
Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (``Burlington'') and staff
(``Staff'') of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
(``Commission'') enter into this Settlement Agreement (``Agreement'').
The Agreement and the incorporated attached Order (``Order'') resolve
Staff's allegations set forth below.
Parties
2. Staff is staff of the Commission, an independent federal
regulatory agency established pursuant to, and responsible for the
enforcement of, the CPSA.
3. Burlington is a corporation, organized and existing under the
laws of Delaware, with its principal offices located in Burlington, New
Jersey.
Staff Allegations
4. On multiple occasions and during various periods from November
2003 to January 2012, Burlington and its subsidiaries sold and/or held
for sale various styles, models, and quantities of children's upper
outerwear products with drawstrings at the neck, including, but not
limited to, the following: Liberty Apparel Company, Inc.--Jewel hooded
sweatshirts; Jason Evans Associates, LLC--Bay Trading hooded
sweatshirts and jackets; Koman Sportswear Manufacturing Corporation--
hooded sweatshirts and jackets; Fashion Options, Inc.--Beverly Hills
Polo Club hooded sweatshirts; Allura Imports, Inc.--Major Diva hooded
sweatshirts; Baycreek, Inc.--Attitude Gold hooded sweatshirts;
Franshaw, Inc.--Blue Heart and Just a Girl hooded sweatshirts; Bobens
Trading Company, Inc.--Old Skool hooded sweatshirts; Weeplay Kids,
LLC--Candy Queen and AKDMKS hooded sweatshirts; Ten West Apparel,
Inc.--hooded jackets; Brand Evolution LLC--All Over Locks, All Over
Skaters, and Rock Mask Hoody hooded sweatshirts; Regaliti, Inc.--Betty
Blue hooded jackets; Byer California--jackets; Haselson International
Trading, Inc.--Kani Gold and Roadblock hooded sweatshirts; Bubblegum
USA--hooded jackets; North-Sportif, Inc.--hooded jackets; Five Star
Apparel--hooded jackets; Trendset Originals LLC--Shampoo hooded
jackets; Hind Fashions, Inc.--Hind leather and Lil Phat hooded jackets;
Lollytogs, Ltd.--Rim Rocka hooded sweatshirts; S. Rothschild & Company,
Inc.--wool coats; AJS Group LLC--Apple Bottom hooded jackets;
Millennium Apparel Group Inc.--Disney Winnie the Pooh hooded jackets;
and Winco USA, Inc.--Sergio Benini hooded jackets. The products
identified in this paragraph are collectively referred to herein as
``Garments.''
[[Page 44594]]
5. Burlington sold the Garments, and/or held the Garments for sale,
to consumers.
6. The Garments are ``consumer product[s],'' and, at all relevant
times, Burlington was a ``retailer'' of those consumer products, which
were ``distributed in commerce,'' as those terms are defined in CPSA
sections 3(a)(5), (8), and (13), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 2052(a)(5), (8), and
(13).
7. In February 1996, Staff issued the Guidelines for Drawstrings on
Children's Upper Outerwear (``Guidelines'') to help prevent children
from strangling or entangling on neck and waist drawstrings. The
Guidelines state that drawstrings can cause, and have caused, injuries
and deaths when they catch on items such as playground equipment, bus
doors, or cribs. In the Guidelines, Staff recommends that no children's
upper outerwear in sizes 2T to 12 be manufactured or sold to consumers
with hood and neck drawstrings.
8. In June 1997, ASTM adopted a voluntary standard (ASTM F1816-97)
incorporating the Guidelines. The Guidelines state that firms should be
aware of the hazards associated with drawstrings and should ensure that
garments they sell conform to the voluntary standard.
9. On May 19, 2006, the Commission posted on its Web site a letter
from the Commission's Director of the Office of Compliance to
manufacturers, importers, and retailers of children's upper outerwear.
The letter urges them to make certain that all children's upper
outerwear sold in the United States complies with ASTM F1816-97. The
letter states that Staff considers children's upper outerwear with
drawstrings at the hood or neck area to be defective and to present a
substantial risk of injury to young children under Federal Hazardous
Substances Act (``FHSA'') section 15(c), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1274(c). The
letter also references the CPSA's section 15(b) (15 U.S.C. Sec.
2064(b)) reporting requirements.
10. Staff provided Burlington with multiple direct notifications of
the hazards associated with drawstrings on children's upper outerwear.
11. Burlington's distribution in commerce of the Garments did not
comply with the Guidelines or ASTM F1816-97, failed to comport with
Staff's May 2006 defect notice, and posed strangulation hazards to
children.
12. Burlington informed the Commission that there had been no
reported incidents or injuries associated with the Garments.
13. The Commission, in cooperation with Burlington and/or other
firms that were the Garments' manufacturers, importers, or
distributors, announced recalls of the Garments.
14. Based in part on information available through the sources set
forth in paragraphs 7 through 10, Burlington had presumed and actual
knowledge that the Garments distributed in commerce posed strangulation
hazards and presented substantial risks of injury to children under
FHSA section 15(c)(1), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1274(c)(1). Burlington obtained
information that reasonably supported the conclusion that the Garments
contained defects that could create substantial product hazards or that
the Garments created unreasonable risks of serious injury or death.
Pursuant to CPSA sections 15(b)(3) and (4), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 2064(b)(3)
and (4), Burlington was required to inform the Commission immediately
of these defects and risks.
15. Burlington knowingly and repeatedly failed to inform the
Commission immediately about the Garments, as required by CPSA sections
15(b)(3) and (4), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 2064(b)(3) and (4), and as the term
``knowingly'' is defined in CPSA section 20(d), 15 U.S.C. Sec.
2069(d). These knowing failures violated CPSA section 19(a)(4), 15
U.S.C. Sec. 2068(a)(4). Pursuant to CPSA section 20, 15 U.S.C. Sec.
2069, these knowing failures subjected Burlington to civil penalties.
16. On repeated occasions from in or about September 2008 to
January 2012, Burlington offered Garments for sale, sold Garments, and/
or otherwise distributed Garments in commerce that were subject to
voluntary corrective actions taken by the Garments' manufacturers in
consultation with the Commission. The Commission had notified the
public of those voluntary corrective actions.
17. Burlington knowingly engaged in the acts alleged in paragraph
16, as the term ``knowingly'' is defined in CPSA section 20(d), 15
U.S.C. Sec. 2069(d). These knowing acts violated CPSA section
19(a)(2)(B), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 2068(a)(2)(B). Pursuant to CPSA section
20, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 2069, these knowing acts subjected Burlington to
civil penalties.
18. Staff denies and/or does not concur with Burlington's
responsive allegations below.
Burlington Responsive Allegations
19. Burlington denies Staff's allegations above, including but not
limited to any claim that Burlington failed to timely report to the
Commission the sale or distribution of any children's upper outerwear
products with drawstrings pursuant to Sec. 15(b) of the CPSA, or that
Burlington knowingly offered Garments for sale, knowingly sold
Garments, and/or otherwise knowingly distributed Garments in commerce
that were subject to voluntary corrective actions.
20. Burlington enters into the Agreement to settle this matter
without the expense of litigation. Burlington enters into the Agreement
and agrees to pay the amount referenced below in compromise of disputed
and unproven allegations. Burlington's entering into the Agreement is
not an admission of liability of any kind, whether legal or factual.
21. Burlington did not manufacture the Garments. It purchased them
from vendors and other suppliers. Consistent with practice in the
retail industry, Burlington contractually required the Garment vendors
to supply products that complied with all federal, state, and local
laws, regulations, and standards, and relied on its suppliers to
provide compliant products, as the suppliers were in the best position
to know and understand the many legal requirements that were or
potentially were applicable to their products.
22. Since the Commission first issued the Guidelines in 1996,
Burlington's children's apparel purchasing policy has prohibited
Burlington's apparel buyers from purchasing children's upper outerwear
with drawstrings. Prior to 2009, Burlington's management had procedures
in place that it reasonably believed prevented the purchase of
children's upper outerwear products with drawstrings. Upon learning in
2009 that, despite such procedures, certain Garments had been
discovered in Burlington's stores, Burlington undertook an extensive
manual audit of all children's upper outerwear in all of its stores to
determine whether it had unknowingly purchased other products subject
to the Guidelines. This audit was a massive undertaking, as
Burlington's personnel in all of its approximately 450 stores at that
time had to visually inspect all items of children's upper outerwear,
and the Guidelines and ASTM standard contain ambiguities that made it
difficult to determine whether certain items failed to comply.
23. Prior to the audit, Burlington's product compliance and safety
personnel and children's apparel buyers had no knowledge, whether
actual or constructive, that the Garments actually supplied by
Burlington's suppliers contained drawstrings. Burlington promptly
notified the Commission pursuant to Sec. 15(b) of the CPSA upon
discovering as a result of the audit that it had purchased and sold
many of the Garments.
[[Page 44595]]
24. Burlington is unaware of any incidents or injuries associated
with the Garments.
Agreement of the Parties
25. Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over this
matter and over Burlington.
26. The parties enter into the Agreement for settlement purposes
only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by Burlington, or
a determination by the Commission, that Burlington knowingly violated
the CPSA.
27. The Agreement is a full and complete resolution between Staff
and Burlington, and its parents, shareholders, divisions, subdivisions,
subsidiaries, partners, sister companies and their successors and
assigns of all claims for civil penalties that have been or could have
been asserted based on the facts contained in Staff's allegations
above, with regard to the failure to report the Garments or sale of the
Garments after corrective action.
28. In settlement of Staff's allegations, Burlington shall pay a
civil penalty in the amount of one million five hundred thousand
dollars ($1,500,000.00). The civil penalty shall be paid within twenty
(20) calendar days of service of the Commission's final Order accepting
the Agreement. The payment shall be made via www.pay.gov.
29. Burlington agrees that it will not seek or accept, directly or
indirectly, indemnification, reimbursement, insurance, or any other
form of compensation or payment, including, but not limited to, cash,
account credit, or set-off, from any vendor or supplier from which
Burlington acquired the Garments, or from any other firm or person, for
the civil penalty that Burlington agrees and is ordered to pay pursuant
to the Agreement and Order.
30. Upon provisional acceptance of the Agreement, the Agreement
shall be placed on the public record and published in the Federal
Register, in accordance with the procedures set forth in 16 C.F.R.
Sec. 1118.20(e). In accordance with 16 C.F.R. Sec. 1118.20(f), if
within fifteen (15) calendar days, the Commission does not receive any
written request not to accept the Agreement, the Agreement shall be
deemed finally accepted on the sixteenth (16th) calendar day after the
date it is published in the Federal Register.
31. Upon the Commission's final acceptance of the Agreement and
issuance of the final Order, Burlington knowingly, voluntarily, and
completely waives any rights it may have in this matter to the
following: (1) An administrative or judicial hearing; (2) judicial
review or other challenge or contest of the validity of the Order or of
the Commission's actions; (3) a determination by the Commission of
whether Burlington failed to comply with the CPSA and its underlying
regulations; (4) a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of
law; and (5) any claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
32. The Commission may publicize the terms of the Agreement and the
Order.
33. The Agreement and the Order shall apply to, and be binding
upon, Burlington and each of its successors and assigns.
34. The Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the
CPSA, and a violation of the Order may subject Burlington and each of
its successors and assigns to appropriate legal action.
35. The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order.
Understandings, agreements, representations, or interpretations apart
from those contained in the Agreement and the Order may not be used to
vary or contradict their terms. The Agreement shall not be waived,
amended, modified, or otherwise altered without written agreement
thereto executed by the party against whom such waiver, amendment,
modification, or alteration is sought to be enforced. The Agreement may
be executed in counterparts.
36. If any provision of the Agreement and the Order is held to be
illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws
effective during the terms of the Agreement and the Order, such
provision shall be fully severable. The balance of the Agreement and
the Order shall remain in full force and effect, unless the Commission
and Burlington agree that severing the provision materially affects the
purpose of the Agreement and the Order.
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation
Dated: June 29, 2012.
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Tang,
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, 1830 Route 130,
Burlington, NJ 08016.
Dated: July 3, 2012.
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey B. Margulies, Esq.
William L. Troutman, Esq.
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., 555 South Flower Street, 41st Floor,
Los Angeles, CA 90071.
Counsel--Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission Staff.
Cheryl A. Falvey,
General Counsel.
Mary B. Murphy,
Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel.
Dated: July 12, 2012
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Seth B. Popkin,
Lead Trial Attorney, Division of Compliance, Office of the General
Counsel.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
In the Matter of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation
CPSC Docket No. 12-C0008
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into between
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (``Burlington'') and U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission (``Commission'') staff, and the
Commission having jurisdiction over the subject matter and over
Burlington, and it appearing that the Settlement Agreement and the
Order are in the public interest, it is
Ordered, that the Settlement Agreement be, and hereby is, accepted;
and it is
Further ordered, that Burlington shall pay a civil penalty in the
amount of one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000.00)
within twenty (20) calendar days of service of the Commission's final
Order accepting the Agreement. The payment shall be made via
www.pay.gov. Upon the failure of Burlington to make the foregoing
payment when due, interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be
paid by Burlington at the federal legal rate of interest set forth at
28 U.S.C. Sec. 1961(a) and (b).
Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 25th day
of July, 2012.
By Order of the Commission:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-18459 Filed 7-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P