Safety Zone; Seafair Blue Angels Air Show Performance, Seattle, WA, 44470-44472 [2012-18450]
Download as PDF
44470
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishing a safety zone for a fireworks
display launch site and fallout area and
is expected to have no impact on the
water or environment. This zone is
designed to protect mariners and
spectators from the hazards associated
with aerial fireworks displays. This rule
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34 (g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Public
Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–0624 to
read as follows:
077°57′05″ W; thence north to latitude
34°14′11″ N, longitude 077°57′07″ W;
thence northwest to latitude 34°14′22″
N, longitude 077°57′19″ W; thence west
to latitude 34°14′22″ N, longitude
077°57′06″ W; thence southeast to
latitude 34°14′07″ N, longitude
077°57′00″ W; thence south to latitude
34°13′54″ N, longitude 077°56′58″ W;
thence to the point of origin, located
approximately 500 yards north of Cape
Fear Memorial Bridge.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in § 165.23 of this
part apply to the area described in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through any portion of
the safety zone must first request
authorization from the Captain of the
Port, or a designated representative,
unless the Captain of the Port
previously announced via Marine Safety
Radio Broadcast on VHF Marine Band
Radio channel 22 (157.1 MHz) that this
regulation will not be enforced in that
portion of the safety zone. The Captain
of the Port can be contacted at telephone
number (910) 343–3882 or by radio on
VHF Marine Band Radio, channels 13
and 16.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State, and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced on August 28, 2012
from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. unless cancelled
earlier by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: July 19, 2012.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2012–18572 Filed 7–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T05–0624 Safety Zone: Fireworks
For NC NENA/APCO Conference, Cape Fear
River, Wilmington, NC.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section, Captain of the Port means
the Commander, Sector North Carolina.
Representative means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been authorized to act on the
behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(b) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: specified waters of the
Captain of the Port, Sector North
Carolina, as defined in 33 CFR 3.25–20,
on the navigable waters of Cape Fear
River within an area bound by a line
drawn from the following points:
Latitude 34°13′54″ N, longitude
077°57′06″ W; thence northeast to
latitude 34°13′57″ N, longitude
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 Jul 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0699]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Seafair Blue Angels Air
Show Performance, Seattle, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone on the waters
of Lake Washington, Seattle, WA. This
action is necessary to safeguard
participants and spectators from the
safety hazards associated with the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Seafair Blue Angels Air Show
Performance which include low flying
high speed aircraft and will do so by
prohibiting entry into the safety zone is
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound or his Designated
Representative.
This rule is effective from 9:00
a.m. on August 2, 2012 through 4:00
p.m. on August 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2012–0699. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Ensign Nathaniel P. Clinger, Coast
Guard Sector Puget Sound Waterways
Management Division, telephone 206–
217–6045, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is establishing this
rule because the current regulation
associated with the Seafair Blue Angels
Air Show performance (33 CFR
165.1319) is not large enough to
safeguard participants and spectators
from the safety hazards of this air
performance.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’
E:\FR\FM\30JYR1.SGM
30JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because publishing an NPRM
would be impracticable since the event
would be over before notice could be
given and comments taken. Notice and
comment would also be contrary to the
public interest because the public
expects to be provided a safe area to
observe the Seafair Blue Angels air
show. Absent this temporary final rule,
the zone provided in 33 CFR 165.1319
will be too small to encompass the
anticipated safe flight pattern of the
demonstrating aircraft, and would
expose spectators to hazards associated
with low-flying aircraft over water.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register, because to do so would be
contrary to the public interest since the
event would be over before notice could
be given and comments taken, and it is
immediately necessary to protect the
event’s spectators from the hazards
associated with the Seafair Blue Angels
Air Show Performance.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this rule is 33
U.S.C.1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701,
3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Public
Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1. which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to define regulatory safety zones.
The Coast Guard is establishing this
safety zone to ensure the safety of the
maritime public during the Seattle Blue
Angels Air Show. The safety zone in 33
CFR 165.1319 has been determined to
be too small to accommodate the
anticipated flight pattern of the Blue
Angels. This temporary final rule
extends the northern boundary line of
the existing regulation northward by
500 yards. The remainder of the safety
zone contained at 33 CFR 165.1319
remains unchanged.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
As described in 69 FR 35249, the
Coast Guard established a final rule for
the Blue Angels Air Show Performance.
This rule was meant to protect the
public from dangers including excessive
noise and falling objects from any
potential accidents caused by these lowflying military aircraft. The regulation
contained in 33 CFR 165.1319
encompasses ‘‘[a]ll waters of Lake
Washington, Washington State,
enclosed by the following points: Near
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Jul 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
the termination of Roanoke Way
47°35′44″ N, 122°14′47″ W; thence to
47°35′48″ N, 122°15′45″ W; thence to
47°36′02.1″ N, 122°15′50.2″ W; thence to
47°35′56.6″ N, 122°16′29.2″ W; thence to
47°35′42″ N, 122°16′24″ W; thence to
the east side of the entrance to the west
highrise of the Interstate 90 bridge;
thence westerly along the south side of
the bridge to the shoreline on the
western terminus of the bridge; thence
southerly along the shoreline to
Andrews Bay at 47°33′06″ N, 122°15′32″
W; thence northeast along the shoreline
of Bailey Peninsula to its northeast
point at 47°33′44″ N, 122°15′04″ W;
thence easterly along the east-west line
drawn tangent to Bailey Peninsula;
thence northerly along the shore of
Mercer Island to the point of origin.
[Datum: NAD 1983]’’
However, the aircraft in question have
a flight pattern that will extend past the
northern boundary of the regulation in
33 CFR 165.1319. As such, an extension
is necessary in order to protect the
spectating public.
This rule encompasses the northern
portion of the Seafair Blue Angels Air
Show Performance Safety Zone, starting
at point 47°36′17.28″ N, 122°16′58.56″
W, thence east to point 47°36′17.28″ N,
122°14′49.44″ W, thence south to point
47°35′45.3″ N, 122°14′49.44″ W, thence
south west along the shore line to the I–
90 bridge at point, 47°35′23.16″ N,
122°15′17.1″ W, thence west along the
I–90 bridge to point, 47°35′25.44″ N,
122°17′9.48″ W, and north along the
shoreline back to the point of origin.
This rule is effective from 9:00 a.m. on
August 2, 2012 through 4:00 p.m. on
August 5, 2012.
During the periods the safety zone is
in effect no person or vessel may enter
into, transit, or remain in the safety zone
without the permission of the Captain of
the Port or his Designated
Representative.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44471
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This expectation is based on the
fact that the regulated area established
by the regulation is not frequented by
commercial navigation, and it is small
in size, and short in duration.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit this portion
of Lake Washington during the time this
regulation is in effect. The zone will not
have a significant economic impact
because it is limited in size and short in
duration. The only vessels likely to be
impacted will be recreational boaters
and small passenger vessel operators.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
E:\FR\FM\30JYR1.SGM
30JYR1
44472
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 146 / Monday, July 30, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Jul 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone. This rule
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–226 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–226 Safety Zone; Seafair Blue
Angels Air Show Performance, Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is
designated as a safety zone: Lake
Washington, Seattle, WA. All waters of
Lake Washington encompassed by the
following points: 47°36′17.28″ N,
122°16′58.56″ W, thence east to point
47°36′17.28″ N, 122°14′49.44″ W, thence
south to point 47°35′45.3″ N,
122°14′49.44″ W, thence south west
along the shore line to the I–90 bridge
at point, 47°35′23.16″ N, 122°15′17.1″
W, thence west along the I–90 bridge to
point, 47°35′25.44″ N, 122°17′9.48″ W,
and north along the shoreline back to
the point of origin.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the safety zone
created by this section without the
permission of the Captain of the Port
(COTP) or his Designated
Representative. Designated
Representatives are Coast Guard
Personnel authorized by the Captain of
the Port to grant persons or vessels
permission to enter or remain in the
safety zone created by this section. See
33 CFR part 165, subpart C, for
additional information and
requirements. The COTP may be
assisted by other federal, state or local
agencies with the enforcement of this
safety zone.
(c) Effective Period. This rule is
effective from 9:00 a.m. on August 2,
2012 through 4:00 p.m. on August 5,
2012.
Dated: July 19, 2012.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2012–18450 Filed 7–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0641]
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
RIN 1625–AA00
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Safety Zone; Port Valdez, Alaska
Maritime Highway System Ferry
Terminal
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\30JYR1.SGM
Coast Guard, DHS.
30JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44470-44472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18450]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0699]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Seafair Blue Angels Air Show Performance, Seattle,
WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the waters of
Lake Washington, Seattle, WA. This action is necessary to safeguard
participants and spectators from the safety hazards associated with the
Seafair Blue Angels Air Show Performance which include low flying high
speed aircraft and will do so by prohibiting entry into the safety zone
is unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or his
Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9:00 a.m. on August 2, 2012 through
4:00 p.m. on August 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2012-0699. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Ensign Nathaniel P. Clinger, Coast Guard Sector Puget
Sound Waterways Management Division, telephone 206-217-6045, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is establishing this rule because the current
regulation associated with the Seafair Blue Angels Air Show performance
(33 CFR 165.1319) is not large enough to safeguard participants and
spectators from the safety hazards of this air performance.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.''
[[Page 44471]]
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule because publishing an NPRM would be impracticable
since the event would be over before notice could be given and comments
taken. Notice and comment would also be contrary to the public interest
because the public expects to be provided a safe area to observe the
Seafair Blue Angels air show. Absent this temporary final rule, the
zone provided in 33 CFR 165.1319 will be too small to encompass the
anticipated safe flight pattern of the demonstrating aircraft, and
would expose spectators to hazards associated with low-flying aircraft
over water.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register, because to do so would be contrary
to the public interest since the event would be over before notice
could be given and comments taken, and it is immediately necessary to
protect the event's spectators from the hazards associated with the
Seafair Blue Angels Air Show Performance.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this rule is 33 U.S.C.1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6,
160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1. which collectively authorize the Coast
Guard to define regulatory safety zones.
The Coast Guard is establishing this safety zone to ensure the
safety of the maritime public during the Seattle Blue Angels Air Show.
The safety zone in 33 CFR 165.1319 has been determined to be too small
to accommodate the anticipated flight pattern of the Blue Angels. This
temporary final rule extends the northern boundary line of the existing
regulation northward by 500 yards. The remainder of the safety zone
contained at 33 CFR 165.1319 remains unchanged.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
As described in 69 FR 35249, the Coast Guard established a final
rule for the Blue Angels Air Show Performance. This rule was meant to
protect the public from dangers including excessive noise and falling
objects from any potential accidents caused by these low-flying
military aircraft. The regulation contained in 33 CFR 165.1319
encompasses ``[a]ll waters of Lake Washington, Washington State,
enclosed by the following points: Near the termination of Roanoke Way
47[deg]35'44'' N, 122[deg]14'47'' W; thence to 47[deg]35'48'' N,
122[deg]15'45'' W; thence to 47[deg]36'02.1'' N, 122[deg]15'50.2'' W;
thence to 47[deg]35'56.6'' N, 122[deg]16'29.2'' W; thence to
47[deg]35'42'' N, 122[deg]16'24'' W; thence to the east side of the
entrance to the west highrise of the Interstate 90 bridge; thence
westerly along the south side of the bridge to the shoreline on the
western terminus of the bridge; thence southerly along the shoreline to
Andrews Bay at 47[deg]33'06'' N, 122[deg]15'32'' W; thence northeast
along the shoreline of Bailey Peninsula to its northeast point at
47[deg]33'44'' N, 122[deg]15'04'' W; thence easterly along the east-
west line drawn tangent to Bailey Peninsula; thence northerly along the
shore of Mercer Island to the point of origin. [Datum: NAD 1983]''
However, the aircraft in question have a flight pattern that will
extend past the northern boundary of the regulation in 33 CFR 165.1319.
As such, an extension is necessary in order to protect the spectating
public.
This rule encompasses the northern portion of the Seafair Blue
Angels Air Show Performance Safety Zone, starting at point
47[deg]36'17.28'' N, 122[deg]16'58.56'' W, thence east to point
47[deg]36'17.28'' N, 122[deg]14'49.44'' W, thence south to point
47[deg]35'45.3'' N, 122[deg]14'49.44'' W, thence south west along the
shore line to the I-90 bridge at point, 47[deg]35'23.16'' N,
122[deg]15'17.1'' W, thence west along the I-90 bridge to point,
47[deg]35'25.44'' N, 122[deg]17'9.48'' W, and north along the shoreline
back to the point of origin. This rule is effective from 9:00 a.m. on
August 2, 2012 through 4:00 p.m. on August 5, 2012.
During the periods the safety zone is in effect no person or vessel
may enter into, transit, or remain in the safety zone without the
permission of the Captain of the Port or his Designated Representative.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This expectation is
based on the fact that the regulated area established by the regulation
is not frequented by commercial navigation, and it is small in size,
and short in duration.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit this portion of Lake Washington during the time
this regulation is in effect. The zone will not have a significant
economic impact because it is limited in size and short in duration.
The only vessels likely to be impacted will be recreational boaters and
small passenger vessel operators.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
[[Page 44472]]
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone.
This rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-226 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-226 Safety Zone; Seafair Blue Angels Air Show
Performance, Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is designated as a safety zone:
Lake Washington, Seattle, WA. All waters of Lake Washington encompassed
by the following points: 47[deg]36'17.28'' N, 122[deg]16'58.56'' W,
thence east to point 47[deg]36'17.28'' N, 122[deg]14'49.44'' W, thence
south to point 47[deg]35'45.3'' N, 122[deg]14'49.44'' W, thence south
west along the shore line to the I-90 bridge at point,
47[deg]35'23.16'' N, 122[deg]15'17.1'' W, thence west along the I-90
bridge to point, 47[deg]35'25.44'' N, 122[deg]17'9.48'' W, and north
along the shoreline back to the point of origin.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR part 165, subpart C, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
safety zone created by this section without the permission of the
Captain of the Port (COTP) or his Designated Representative. Designated
Representatives are Coast Guard Personnel authorized by the Captain of
the Port to grant persons or vessels permission to enter or remain in
the safety zone created by this section. See 33 CFR part 165, subpart
C, for additional information and requirements. The COTP may be
assisted by other federal, state or local agencies with the enforcement
of this safety zone.
(c) Effective Period. This rule is effective from 9:00 a.m. on
August 2, 2012 through 4:00 p.m. on August 5, 2012.
Dated: July 19, 2012.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2012-18450 Filed 7-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P