Antimicrobial Animal Drug Sales and Distribution Reporting, 44177-44179 [2012-18366]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
prohibit that attorney from being
present during testimony.
§ 1708.111
Sequestration of witnesses.
(a) Witnesses shall be sequestered
during interviews, or during the taking
of testimony, unless otherwise
permitted by the Investigating Officer(s),
or by the Board, as the case may be.
(b) No witness, or counsel
accompanying any such witness, shall
be permitted to be present during the
examination of any other witness called
in such proceeding, unless permitted by
the Investigating Officer(s), or the Board,
as the case may be.
§ 1708.112 Appearance and practice
before the Board.
(a) Counsel appearing before the
Board or the Investigating Officer(s)
must conform to the standards of ethical
conduct required of practitioners before
the Courts of the United States.
(b) The Board may suspend and deny,
temporarily or permanently, the
privilege of appearing or practicing
before the Board in any way to a person
who is found:
(1) Not to possess the requisite
qualifications to represent others; or
(2) To have engaged in unethical or
improper professional conduct; or
(3) To have engaged in obstructionism
or contumacy; or
(4) To be otherwise not qualified.
(c) Obstructionist or contumacious
conduct in an investigation before the
Board or the Investigating Officer(s) will
be grounds for exclusion of any person
from such safety investigation
proceedings and for summary
suspension for the duration of the
course of the investigation.
(d) A witness may retain replacement
counsel if original counsel is suspended
or excluded.
§ 1708.113
Right to submit statements.
At any time during the course of an
investigation, any person may submit
documents, statements of facts, or
memoranda of law for the purpose of
explanation or further development of
the facts and circumstances relevant to
the safety matter under investigation.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 1708.114
Official transcripts.
(a) Official transcripts of testimony of
witnesses, whether or not compelled by
subpoena to appear before a Board
safety investigation, shall be recorded
either by an official reporter, or by any
other person or means designated by the
Investigating Officer or the Board’s
General Counsel.
(b) Such witness, after completing the
compelled testimony may file a request
with the Board’s General Counsel to
procure a copy of the official transcript
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Jul 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
of that witness’s testimony. The General
Counsel shall rule on the request, and
may deny for good cause.
(c) Good cause for denying a witness’s
request to procure a transcript may
include, but shall not be limited to, the
protection of a trade secret, nondisclosure of confidential or proprietary
business information, security sensitive
operational or vulnerability information,
safety privileged information, or the
integrity of Board investigations.
(d) Whether or not a request is made,
the witness and his or her attorney shall
have the right to inspect the official
transcript of the witness’s own
testimony, in the presence of the
Investigating Officer or his designee, for
purposes of conducting errata review.
(e) Transcripts of testimony are
otherwise considered confidential and
privileged safety information and in no
case shall a copy or any reproduction of
such transcript be released to any other
person or entity, except as provided in
paragraph (2) above or as required under
the Freedom of Information Act or the
Government in the Sunshine Act, or any
procedures or requirements contained
in Board regulations issued pursuant to
those Acts.
§ 1708.115 Final report of safety
investigation.
(a) The Board will complete a final
report of the safety investigation fully
setting forth the Board’s findings and
conclusions.
(b) The final report of the safety
investigation is confidential and
protected by the safety privilege, and is
therefore not releasable.
(c) The Board in its discretion may
sanitize the final report of the safety
investigation by redacting confidential
and safety privileged information so that
the report is put in a publically
releasable format.
(d) Nothing in this section voids or
otherwise displaces the Board’s legal
obligations with respect to compliance
with the Freedom of Information Act,
the Government in the Sunshine Act, or
any procedures or requirements
contained in the Board’s regulations
issued pursuant to those Acts.
§ 1708.116 Procedure after safety
investigations.
(a) If a formal safety investigation
results in a finding that an event or
practice has adversely affected, or may
adversely affect, public health and
safety, the Board may take any
appropriate action authorized to it
under its enabling statute, including,
but not limited to, making a formal
recommendation to the Secretary of
Energy, convening a hearing, or
establishing a reporting requirement.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44177
(b) If a safety investigation yields
information relating to violations of
Federal criminal law involving
Government officers and employees, the
Board shall expeditiously refer the
matter to the Department of Justice for
disposition.
(c) If in the course of a safety
investigation a safety issue or concern is
found to be outside the Board’s
jurisdiction, that safety issue or concern
shall be referred to the appropriate
entity with jurisdiction for disposition.
(d) Statements made in connection
with testimony provided to the Board in
an investigation are subject to the
provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1001.
Dated: July 20, 2012.
Jessie H. Roberson,
Vice Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2012–18180 Filed 7–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 514
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0447]
Antimicrobial Animal Drug Sales and
Distribution Reporting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
soliciting comments regarding potential
changes to its regulations relating to
records and reports for approved new
animal drugs. FDA is considering
revisions to this regulation to
incorporate the requirements of section
105 of the Animal Drug User Fee
Amendments of 2008 (ADUFA 105). As
part of that process, FDA is reviewing
other reporting requirements applicable
to antimicrobial new animal drug
sponsors to determine whether
additional information should be
reported. Collecting data on
antimicrobial drugs used in foodproducing animals will assist FDA in
tracking antimicrobial use trends and
examining how such trends may relate
to antimicrobial resistance.
DATES: Submit electronic or written
comments by September 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2012–N–
0447, by any of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
44178
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• Fax: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and
Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0447 for this
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neal
Bataller, Center for Veterinary Medicine
(HFV–210), Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–9062,
email: Neal.Bataller@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
I. Background
Section 512(l) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)
(21 U.S.C. 360b(l)) requires sponsors of
approved or conditionally approved
new animal drug applications to
establish and maintain records and
make such reports of data relating to
experience with uses and other data or
information received or obtained by the
sponsor with respect to such animal
drugs as required by regulation or order.
FDA’s regulation relating to records and
reports for approved new animal drugs
is found at 21 CFR 514.80. This
regulation requires an animal drug
sponsor to submit a number of different
reports, including periodic drug
experience reports, which must contain,
among other things, drug distribution
data showing the amount of the drug
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Jul 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
distributed domestically and the
amount exported.
In 2008, ADUFA 105 directed the
Agency to collect additional data and
information about approved
antimicrobial new animal drugs by
amending section 512(l) of the FD&C
Act to include new reporting
requirements for sponsors of approved
antimicrobial new animal drugs. Under
section 512(l) of the FD&C Act, as
amended by ADUFA 105, antimicrobial
new animal drug sponsors must now
also submit to FDA on an annual basis
a report specifying the amount of each
antimicrobial active ingredient in the
sponsor’s drug that is sold or distributed
for use in food-producing animals.
Specifically, sponsors are required to
report the amount of each antimicrobial
active ingredient as follows: (1) By
container size, strength, and dosage
form; (2) by quantities distributed
domestically and quantities exported;
and (3) for each dosage form, a listing
of the target animals, indications, and
production classes that are specified on
the approved label of the product.
Currently, sponsors of antimicrobial
drugs that are approved and labeled for
multiple animal species, including both
food-producing and nonfood-producing
animals, do not report sales and
distribution information for each
individual animal species. Only total
product sales information is reported.
The information must be reported for
the preceding calendar year, and
include separate information for each
month of the calendar year, and be
submitted to FDA each year by no later
than March 31. ADUFA 105 also
requires FDA to publish an annual
summary report of the antimicrobial
drug sales and distribution data it
receives.
The sales and distribution
information that is currently being
collected from antimicrobial new
animal drug sponsors in accordance
with ADUFA 105 is important in
supporting efforts such as the National
Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring
System (NARMS), a surveillance
program that tracks trends related to
antimicrobial resistance in foodproducing animals and humans.
A recent Government Accountability
Office (GAO) report addressing
antibiotic resistance concluded that
sales and distribution information as
currently collected by FDA does not
provide sufficient data needed to
analyze trends in antimicrobial
resistance, such as information on
actual drug use in specific foodproducing animal species (Ref. 1).
Having improved data would enable the
Agency to better correlate resistance
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
data in NARMS with drug exposure,
thereby providing improved information
for science-based decisionmaking in the
approval and monitoring of safe and
effective antimicrobial drugs. In
addition, such information would
further enhance FDA’s ongoing
activities related to antimicrobial
resistance and is consistent with the
recommendations in guidance recently
issued by this Agency addressing the
judicious use of medically important
antimicrobial drugs in food-producing
animals (Ref. 2).
II. Agency Request for Comments
A. Sales and Distribution Data by
Species
FDA is considering revisions to the
requirements in this Agency’s regulation
at § 514.80 to incorporate the
requirements of ADUFA 105 and, as
part of that process, is reviewing other
reporting requirements applicable to
antimicrobial new animal drug sponsors
to determine whether additional
information should be reported. FDA is
soliciting public comment on whether,
consistent with its authority under
section 512(l) of the FD&C Act to collect
information relating to approved new
animal drugs, it should amend its
regulations to require the submission of
additional sales and distribution
information including, for antimicrobial
animal drug products that are approved
and labeled for more than one foodproducing animal species, an estimate
of the amount of each active
antimicrobial ingredient sold or
distributed for use in each approved
food-producing animal species.
Specifically, comments should address
how sponsors can both practically and
accurately provide separate sales and
distribution information for each
species.
B. FDA’s Annual Summary Report
ADUFA 105 directs FDA to issue on
an annual basis a summary report of the
sales and distribution data collected
from sponsors of antimicrobial new
animal drugs and further provides that
such data must be reported by
antimicrobial class. ADUFA 105 also
directs FDA to independently report
only those antimicrobial drug classes
with three or more distinct sponsors, so
as to protect confidential business
information. Within these statutory
parameters, FDA is seeking public
comment on how best to compile and
present this summary information.
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
C. Alternative Methods for Obtaining
Antimicrobial Use Data
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
This advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking is issued under section 512
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360b) and
under the authority of the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
IV. References
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday. (FDA has verified the
Web site address, but we are not
responsible for any subsequent changes
to the Web site after this document
publishes in the Federal Register.)
1. U.S. General Accounting Office,
‘‘Antibiotic Resistance: Agencies Have Made
Limited Progress Addressing Antibiotic Use
in Animals,’’ GAO–11–801, Washington, DC,
General Accounting Office, 2011 (https://
www.gao.gov/new.items/d11801.pdf).
2. Guidance for Industry #209, entitled
‘‘The Judicious Use of Medically Important
Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing
Animals’’ (https://www.fda.gov/
AnimalVeterinary/
GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/
GuidanceforIndustry/default.htm).
Dated: June 29, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–18366 Filed 7–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Jul 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
Counsel, or Stephen Ruwe, Attorney
Advisor, Office of the General Counsel,
PO Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024–
0400 Telephone: (202) 707–1673.
Telefax: (202) 252–3423.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
FDA is seeking public comment on
alternative methods available to the
Agency for obtaining additional data
and information about the extent of
antimicrobial drug use in foodproducing animals. Specifically, the
Agency is requesting public input on
alternative methods for assessing
antimicrobial use the Agency can
employ within its existing authority that
may further support the analysis of
factors related to the development and
spread of antimicrobial resistance in
connection with the use of medically
important antibiotics in food-producing
animals.
Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201 and 210
[Docket No. 2012–7]
Mechanical and Digital Phonorecord
Delivery Compulsory License
Copyright Office, Library of
Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Copyright Office of the
Library of Congress is proposing to
amend its regulations for reporting
Monthly and Annual Statements of
Account for the making and distribution
of phonorecords under the compulsory
license, 17 U.S.C. 115, to bring the
regulations up to date to reflect recent
and pending rate determinations by the
Copyright Royalty Judges, which among
other things provide new rates for
limited downloads, interactive
streaming and incidental digital
phonorecord deliveries, and to
harmonize these reporting requirements
with the existing regulations for
reporting the making and distribution of
physical phonorecords, permanent
downloads and ringtones.
DATES: Comments are due no later than
September 25, 2012. Reply comments
are due October 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The Copyright Office
strongly prefers that comments be
submitted electronically. A comment
submission page is posted on the
Copyright Office Web site at https://
www.copyright.gov/docs/section115/
soa/comments/. The Web site interface
requires submitters to complete a form
specifying name and other required
information, and to upload comments as
an attachment. To meet accessibility
standards, all comments must be
uploaded in a single file in either the
Adobe Portable Document File (PDF)
format that contains searchable,
accessible text (not an image); Microsoft
Word; WordPerfect; Rich Text Format
(RTF); or ASCII text file format (not a
scanned document). The maximum file
size is 6 megabytes (MB). The name of
the submitter and organization should
appear on both the form and the face of
the comments. All comments will be
posted publicly on the Copyright Office
Web site exactly as they are received,
along with names and, if provided,
organizations. If electronic submission
of comments is not feasible, please
contact the Copyright Office at (202)
707–XXXX for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tanya Sandros, Deputy General
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44179
Background
Section 115 of the Copyright Act
provides a compulsory license for
reproducing and distributing
phonorecords of a musical work. The
mechanical license limits the exclusive
rights granted to copyright owners by
enabling anyone to make a phonorecord
of an eligible musical work for the
purpose of distributing it to the public
for private use.
The mechanical license may be used
once phonorecords of a nondramatic
musical work have been distributed to
the public in the United States under
the authority of the copyright owner. In
order to legally use the mechanical
license, the licensee has to comply with
the requirements in the statute and pay
a royalty fee to the copyright owner. The
mechanical license has its limitations; it
is only available to make and distribute
phonorecords of a musical work and it
does not allow the licensee to reproduce
and distribute another’s sound
recording, or change the ‘‘basic melody
or fundamental character of the work.’’
17 U.S.C. 115(a)(2).
The mechanical license was
established in the 1909 Copyright Act as
the first compulsory license in United
States copyright law. Congress created
the license because it wanted to make
musical compositions available for
public use, prevent monopoly, and at
the same time ensure that compensation
is provided to copyright owners. The
first mechanical license was established
in response to the 1908 Supreme Court
holding in White-Smith Music
Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co., 209 U.S.
1 (1908). The Court decided that piano
rolls were not considered ‘copies’ of a
musical work because they did not
contain a system of notation that could
be read. Instead, the Court held they
were merely mechanical reproductions
made for the purpose of performing
music. This decision prompted
Congress to extend copyright protection
to include the right to make mechanical
devices which embody the musical
work. H.R. Rep. No. 60–2222, at 9
(1909). However, Congress was
concerned that extending the right of
reproduction to include mechanical
devices like piano rolls would enable a
cartel of music publishers to exercise
monopoly power over the recording of
music to the possible detriment of the
copyright owners of the musical work.
To ensure a balance, Congress created
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 145 (Friday, July 27, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44177-44179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18366]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 514
[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0447]
Antimicrobial Animal Drug Sales and Distribution Reporting
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is soliciting
comments regarding potential changes to its regulations relating to
records and reports for approved new animal drugs. FDA is considering
revisions to this regulation to incorporate the requirements of section
105 of the Animal Drug User Fee Amendments of 2008 (ADUFA 105). As part
of that process, FDA is reviewing other reporting requirements
applicable to antimicrobial new animal drug sponsors to determine
whether additional information should be reported. Collecting data on
antimicrobial drugs used in food-producing animals will assist FDA in
tracking antimicrobial use trends and examining how such trends may
relate to antimicrobial resistance.
DATES: Submit electronic or written comments by September 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2012-
N-0447, by any of the following methods:
[[Page 44178]]
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
Fax: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper or CD-ROM
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name
and Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0447 for this rulemaking. All comments
received may be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. For additional information
on submitting comments, see the ``Comments'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neal Bataller, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-210), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240-276-9062, email: Neal.Bataller@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 512(l) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360b(l)) requires sponsors of approved or
conditionally approved new animal drug applications to establish and
maintain records and make such reports of data relating to experience
with uses and other data or information received or obtained by the
sponsor with respect to such animal drugs as required by regulation or
order. FDA's regulation relating to records and reports for approved
new animal drugs is found at 21 CFR 514.80. This regulation requires an
animal drug sponsor to submit a number of different reports, including
periodic drug experience reports, which must contain, among other
things, drug distribution data showing the amount of the drug
distributed domestically and the amount exported.
In 2008, ADUFA 105 directed the Agency to collect additional data
and information about approved antimicrobial new animal drugs by
amending section 512(l) of the FD&C Act to include new reporting
requirements for sponsors of approved antimicrobial new animal drugs.
Under section 512(l) of the FD&C Act, as amended by ADUFA 105,
antimicrobial new animal drug sponsors must now also submit to FDA on
an annual basis a report specifying the amount of each antimicrobial
active ingredient in the sponsor's drug that is sold or distributed for
use in food-producing animals. Specifically, sponsors are required to
report the amount of each antimicrobial active ingredient as follows:
(1) By container size, strength, and dosage form; (2) by quantities
distributed domestically and quantities exported; and (3) for each
dosage form, a listing of the target animals, indications, and
production classes that are specified on the approved label of the
product. Currently, sponsors of antimicrobial drugs that are approved
and labeled for multiple animal species, including both food-producing
and nonfood-producing animals, do not report sales and distribution
information for each individual animal species. Only total product
sales information is reported. The information must be reported for the
preceding calendar year, and include separate information for each
month of the calendar year, and be submitted to FDA each year by no
later than March 31. ADUFA 105 also requires FDA to publish an annual
summary report of the antimicrobial drug sales and distribution data it
receives.
The sales and distribution information that is currently being
collected from antimicrobial new animal drug sponsors in accordance
with ADUFA 105 is important in supporting efforts such as the National
Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS), a surveillance
program that tracks trends related to antimicrobial resistance in food-
producing animals and humans.
A recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) report addressing
antibiotic resistance concluded that sales and distribution information
as currently collected by FDA does not provide sufficient data needed
to analyze trends in antimicrobial resistance, such as information on
actual drug use in specific food-producing animal species (Ref. 1).
Having improved data would enable the Agency to better correlate
resistance data in NARMS with drug exposure, thereby providing improved
information for science-based decisionmaking in the approval and
monitoring of safe and effective antimicrobial drugs. In addition, such
information would further enhance FDA's ongoing activities related to
antimicrobial resistance and is consistent with the recommendations in
guidance recently issued by this Agency addressing the judicious use of
medically important antimicrobial drugs in food-producing animals (Ref.
2).
II. Agency Request for Comments
A. Sales and Distribution Data by Species
FDA is considering revisions to the requirements in this Agency's
regulation at Sec. 514.80 to incorporate the requirements of ADUFA 105
and, as part of that process, is reviewing other reporting requirements
applicable to antimicrobial new animal drug sponsors to determine
whether additional information should be reported. FDA is soliciting
public comment on whether, consistent with its authority under section
512(l) of the FD&C Act to collect information relating to approved new
animal drugs, it should amend its regulations to require the submission
of additional sales and distribution information including, for
antimicrobial animal drug products that are approved and labeled for
more than one food-producing animal species, an estimate of the amount
of each active antimicrobial ingredient sold or distributed for use in
each approved food-producing animal species. Specifically, comments
should address how sponsors can both practically and accurately provide
separate sales and distribution information for each species.
B. FDA's Annual Summary Report
ADUFA 105 directs FDA to issue on an annual basis a summary report
of the sales and distribution data collected from sponsors of
antimicrobial new animal drugs and further provides that such data must
be reported by antimicrobial class. ADUFA 105 also directs FDA to
independently report only those antimicrobial drug classes with three
or more distinct sponsors, so as to protect confidential business
information. Within these statutory parameters, FDA is seeking public
comment on how best to compile and present this summary information.
[[Page 44179]]
C. Alternative Methods for Obtaining Antimicrobial Use Data
FDA is seeking public comment on alternative methods available to
the Agency for obtaining additional data and information about the
extent of antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals.
Specifically, the Agency is requesting public input on alternative
methods for assessing antimicrobial use the Agency can employ within
its existing authority that may further support the analysis of factors
related to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance in
connection with the use of medically important antibiotics in food-
producing animals.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
This advanced notice of proposed rulemaking is issued under section
512 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360b) and under the authority of the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
IV. References
The following references have been placed on display in the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
(FDA has verified the Web site address, but we are not responsible for
any subsequent changes to the Web site after this document publishes in
the Federal Register.)
1. U.S. General Accounting Office, ``Antibiotic Resistance:
Agencies Have Made Limited Progress Addressing Antibiotic Use in
Animals,'' GAO-11-801, Washington, DC, General Accounting Office,
2011 (https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11801.pdf).
2. Guidance for Industry 209, entitled ``The Judicious
Use of Medically Important Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing
Animals'' (https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/default.htm).
Dated: June 29, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-18366 Filed 7-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P