Special Conditions: Agusta S.p.A. Model AW139 and AB139 Helicopter, Installation of a Search and Rescue (SAR) Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS), 44110-44113 [2012-18199]
Download as PDF
44110
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
the request and will publish that
determination in the Federal Register.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
July 2012.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–18324 Filed 7–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 29
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0785; Special
Conditions No. 29–027–SC]
Special Conditions: Agusta S.p.A.
Model AW139 and AB139 Helicopter,
Installation of a Search and Rescue
(SAR) Automatic Flight Control System
(AFCS)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta)
Model AW139 and AB139 helicopters.
These model helicopters, as modified by
Agusta, will have novel or unusual
design features associated with
installing an optional SAR AFCS. The
applicable airworthiness standards do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards the
Administrator considers necessary to
show a level of safety equivalent to that
established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is July 18, 2012. We
must receive your comments by
September 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number [FAA–2012–0785]
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery of Courier: Deliver
comments to the ‘‘Mail’’ address
between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://regulations.gov, including any
personal information the commenter
provides. Using the search function of
the docket Web site, anyone can find
and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: You can read the background
documents or comments received at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for accessing the
docket or go to the Docket Operations in
Room @12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
FAA, Aircraft Certification Service,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and
Policy Group (ASW–111), Attn: Stephen
Barbini, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817)
222–5196; facsimile (817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Reason for No Prior Notice and
Comment Before Adoption
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period previously
and has been derived without
substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. Further, a delay in the
effective date of these special conditions
would significantly delay issuance of
the design approval and thus delivery of
the helicopter, which is imminent.
Therefore, the FAA has determined that
prior public notice and comment are
unnecessary, impracticable, and
contrary to the public interest, and finds
good cause exists for adopting these
special conditions upon issuance. The
FAA is requesting comments to allow
interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in
response to the prior opportunities for
comment.
Comments Invited
While we did not precede this with a
notice of proposed special conditions,
we invite interested people to take part
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in this action by sending written
comments, data, or views. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the special conditions,
explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring additional expense or
delay. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Background and Discussion
On November 11, 2008, Agusta
applied for a change to Type Certificate
(TC) No. R00002RD to install an
optional SAR AFCS in the Model AB139
and AW139 helicopters. The AB139 and
AW139 models are transport category
helicopters certificated to Category A
and Category B requirements, and
instrument flight certificated under the
requirements of Appendix B to 14 CFR
part 29, Amendment 29–40.
There is a need to use dedicated
AFCS upper modes, in which a fully
coupled autopilot provides operational
SAR profiles, for SAR operations
conducted over water in offshore areas
clear of obstructions. The SAR modes
enable the helicopter pilot to fly fully
coupled maneuvers, to include
predefined search patterns during cruise
flight, and to transition from cruise
flight to a stabilized hover and
departure (transition from hover to
cruise flight). The SAR AFCS also
includes an auxiliary crew control that
allows another crewmember (such as a
hoist operator) to have limited authority
to control the helicopter’s longitudinal
and lateral position during hover
operations.
Flight operations conducted over
water at night may have an extremely
limited visual horizon with little visual
reference to the surface even when
conducted under Visual Meteorological
Conditions. Consequently, the
certification requirements for SAR
modes must meet Appendix B to 14 CFR
part 29 for helicopter instrument flight.
While this appendix prescribes
airworthiness criteria for instrument
flight, it does not consider operations
below instrument flight minimum speed
(VMINI), whereas the SAR modes allow
for coupled operations at low speed, allazimuth flight to zero airspeed (hover).
Since SAR operations have
traditionally been a public use mission,
the use of SAR modes in civil
operations requires special
airworthiness standards (special
conditions) to maintain a level of safety
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
consistent with Category A and
Instrument Flight Rule (IFR)
certification. In this regard, 14 CFR part
29 lacks adequate airworthiness
standards for AFCS SAR mode
certification to include flight
characteristics, performance, and
installed equipment and systems.
Type Certification Basis
Under 14 CFR 21.101, Agusta must
show the AW139 and AB139 model
helicopters, as changed, continue to
meet either the applicable provisions of
the rules incorporated by reference in
TC No. R00002RD or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of
application for the change, depending
on the significance of the change as
defined by 14 CFR 21.101. The
regulations incorporated by reference in
the TC are commonly referred to as the
‘‘original type certification basis.’’ The
regulations incorporated by reference in
R00002RD are as follows:
(a) 14 CFR 21.29 and Part 29,
Amendments 29–1 through 29–45.
(b) Appendix B to Part 29,
Amendment 29–40.
(c) 14 CFR part 36, Appendix H,
Amendment 36–1 through Amendment
36–25.
(d) Special Condition No. 29–0010–
SC, High Intensity Radiated Fields
(HIRF), dated Feb. 19, 2004.
(e) Equivalent Level of Safety
Findings issued against:
(1) 14 CFR 29.1305, as documented in
AB139 FAA Memo dated Dec. 20, 2004.
(2) 14 CFR 29.1321, as documented in
AB139 FAA Memo dated Dec. 20, 2004.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Basis for Special Conditions
If the Administrator finds the
applicable airworthiness standards (i.e.,
14 CFR part 29) do not contain adequate
or appropriate safety standards for the
Agusta model AW139 and AB139
helicopters because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under 14 CFR
21.16.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38, and
they become part of the type
certification basis under § 21.101.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the TC for that model
be amended later to include any other
model that incorporates the same novel
or unusual design feature, or should any
other model already included on the
same TC be modified to incorporate the
same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also
apply to the other model.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
44111
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Special Conditions
The Agusta model AW139 and AB139
helicopters will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design
features:
The SAR system is composed of a
navigation computer with SAR modes,
an AFCS that provides coupled SAR
functions, hoist operator control, a
hover speed reference system, and two
radio altimeters. The AFCS coupled
SAR functions include:
(a) Hover hold at selected height
above the surface.
(b) Ground speed hold.
(c) Transition down and hover to a
waypoint under guidance from the
navigation computer.
(d) SAR pattern, transition down, and
hover near a target over which the
helicopter has flown.
(e) Transition up, climb, and capture
a cruise height.
(f) Capture and track SAR search
patterns generated by the navigation
computer.
(g) Monitor the preselected hover
height with automatic increase in
collective if the aircraft height drops
below the safe minimum height.
These SAR modes are intended to be
used over large bodies of water in areas
clear of obstructions. Further, use of the
modes that transition down from cruise
to hover will include operation at
airspeeds below VMINI.
The SAR system only entails
navigation, flight control, and coupled
AFCS operation of the helicopter. The
system does not include the additional
equipment that may be required for over
water flight or external loads to meet
other operational requirements.
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Agusta Model
AW139 and AB139 helicopters when
the optional Search and Rescue (SAR)
Automatic Flight Control System
(AFCS) is installed:
In addition to the part 29 certification
requirements for Category A and
helicopter instrument flight (Appendix
B), the following additional
requirements must be met for
certification of the SAR AFCS:
(a) SAR Flight Modes. The coupled
SAR flight modes must provide:
(1) Safe and controlled flight in three
axes (lateral and longitudinal position/
speed and height/vertical speed) at all
airspeeds from instrument flight
minimum speed (VMINI) to a hover
within the maximum demonstrated
wind envelope.
(2) Automatic transition to the
helicopter instrument flight (Appendix
B) envelope as part of the normal SAR
mode sequencing.
(3) A pilot-selectable Go-Around
mode that safely interrupts any other
coupled mode and automatically
transitions the helicopter to the
instrument flight (Appendix B)
envelope.
(4) A means to prevent unintended
flight below a safe minimum height.
Pilot-commanded descent below the
safe minimum height is acceptable
provided the alerting requirements in
(b)(7)(i) alert the pilot of this descent
below safe minimum height.
(b) SAR Mode System Architecture.
To support the integrity of the SAR
modes, the following system
architecture is required:
(1) A system for limiting the engine
power demanded by the AFCS when
any of the automatic piloting modes are
engaged, so full authority digital engine
control power limitations, such as
torque and temperature, are not
exceeded.
(2) A system providing the aircraft
height above the surface and final pilotselected height at a location on the
instrument panel in a position
acceptable to the FAA that will make it
plainly visible to and usable by any
pilot at their station.
(3) A system providing the aircraft
heading and the pilot-selected heading
at a location on the instrument panel in
a position acceptable to the FAA that
will make it plainly visible to and
usable by any pilot at their station.
(4) A system providing the aircraft
longitudinal and lateral ground speeds
Applicability
These special conditions apply to the
Agusta Model AW139 and AB139
helicopters. Should Agusta apply at a
later date for a change to the TC to
include another model incorporating the
same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would apply to
that model as well under the provisions
of § 21.101(d).
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on two
model helicopters (i.e., AW139 and
AB139 helicopters). It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 29
Aircraft, Aviation safety.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701–
44702, 44704.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
44112
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
and the pilot-selected longitudinal and
lateral ground speeds when used by the
AFCS in the flight envelope where
airspeed indications become unreliable.
This information must be presented at a
location on the instrument panel in a
position acceptable to the FAA that is
plainly visible to and usable by any
pilot at their station.
(5) A system providing wind speed
and wind direction when automatic
piloting modes are engaged or
transitioning from one mode to another.
(6) A system that monitors for flight
guidance deviations and failures, and
contains an alerting function that
provides the flight crew with enough
information to take appropriate
corrective action.
(7) The alerting system must provide
visual or aural alerts, or both, to the
flight crew under any of the below
conditions:
(i) When the stored or pilot-selected
safe minimum height is reached.
(ii) When a SAR mode system
malfunction occurs.
(iii) When the AFCS changes modes
automatically from one SAR mode to
another.
For normal transitions from one SAR
mode to another, a single visual or aural
alert may suffice. For a SAR mode
malfunction or a mode having a timecritical component, the flight crew
alerting system must activate early
enough to allow the flight crew to take
timely and appropriate action. The
alerting system means must be designed
to alert the flight crew in order to
minimize crew errors that could create
an additional hazard.
(8) The SAR system hoist operator
control is considered a flight control
with limited authority and must comply
with the following:
(i) The hoist operator control must be
designed and located to provide for
convenient operation and to prevent
confusion and inadvertent operation.
(ii) The helicopter must be safely
controllable by the hoist operator
control throughout the range of that
control.
(iii) The hoist operator control may
not interfere with the safe operation of
the helicopter.
(iv) Pilot and copilot flight controls
must be able to smoothly override the
limited control authority of the hoist
operator control, without exceptional
piloting skill, alertness, or strength, and
without the danger of exceeding any
other limitation because of the override.
(9) The reliability of the AFCS must
be related to the effects of its failure.
The occurrence of any failure condition
that would prevent continued safe flight
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
and landing must be extremely
improbable. For any failure condition of
the AFCS which is not shown to be
extremely improbable:
(i) The helicopter must be safely
controllable and capable of continued
safe flight without exceptional piloting
skill, alertness, or strength. Additional
unrelated probable failures affecting the
control system must be evaluated.
(ii) The AFCS must be designed so
that it cannot create a hazardous
deviation in the flight path or produce
hazardous loads on the helicopter
during normal operation or in the event
of a malfunction or failure, assuming
corrective action begins within an
appropriate period of time. Where
multiple systems are installed,
subsequent malfunction conditions
must be evaluated in sequence unless
their occurrence is shown to be
improbable.
(10) A functional hazard assessment
and a system safety assessment must be
provided to the FAA that addresses the
failure conditions associated with SAR
operations.
(i) For SAR catastrophic failure
conditions, changes may be required to
the following:
(A) System architecture.
(B) Software and complex electronic
hardware design assurance levels.
(C) High Intensity Radiated Field
(HIRF) test levels.
(D) Instructions for continued
airworthiness.
(ii) The assessments must consider all
the systems required for SAR operations
to include the AFCS, all associated
AFCS sensors (for example, radio
altimeter), and primary flight displays.
Electrical and electronic systems with
SAR catastrophic failure conditions (for
example, AFCS) must comply with the
§ 29.1317(a)(4) HIRF requirements.
(c) SAR Mode Performance
Requirements.
(1) Demonstrate the SAR modes for
the requested flight envelope, including
the following minimum sea-state and
wind conditions:
(i) Sea State: Wave height of 2.5
meters (8.2 feet), considering both short
and long swells.
(ii) Wind: 25 knots headwind; 17
knots for all other azimuths.
(2) The selected hover height and
hover velocity must be captured (to
include the transition from one captured
mode to another captured mode)
accurately and smoothly and not exhibit
any significant overshoot or oscillation.
(3) The minimum use height (MUH)
for the SAR modes must be no more
than the maximum loss of height
following any single failure or any
combination of failures not shown to be
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
extremely improbable, plus an
additional 15 feet. The MUH is the
minimum height at which any SAR
AFCS mode may be engaged.
(4) The SAR mode system must be
usable up to the maximum certified
gross weight of the aircraft or to the
lower of the following weights:
(i) Maximum emergency flotation
weight.
(ii) Maximum hover Out-of-Ground
Effect (OGE) weight.
(iii) Maximum demonstrated weight.
(d) Flight Characteristics.
(1) The basic aircraft must meet all of
the part 29 airworthiness criteria for
helicopter instrument flight (Appendix
B).
(2) For SAR mode coupled flight
below VMINI, at the maximum
demonstrated winds, the helicopter
must be able to maintain any required
flight condition and make a smooth
transition from any flight condition to
any other flight condition without
requiring exceptional piloting skill,
alertness, or strength, and without
exceeding the limit load factor. This
requirement also includes aircraft
control through the hoist operator’s
control.
(3) For SAR modes at airspeeds below
VMINI, the following requirements of
Appendix B to part 29 must be met and
will be used as an extension to the IFR
certification envelope of the basic
aircraft:
(i) Static Longitudinal Stability: the
requirements of paragraph IV of
Appendix B are not applicable.
(ii) Static Lateral-Directional Stability:
The requirements of paragraph V of
Appendix B are not applicable.
(iii) Dynamic Stability: The
requirements of paragraph VI of
Appendix B are replaced with the
following two paragraphs:
(A) Any oscillation must be damped
and any aperiodic response must not
double in amplitude in less than 10
seconds. This requirement must also be
met with degraded upper mode(s) of the
AFCS. An ‘‘upper mode’’ is a mode that
utilizes a fully coupled autopilot to
provide an operational SAR profile.
(B) After any upset, the AFCS must
return the aircraft to the last
commanded position within 10 seconds
or less.
(4) With any of the upper mode(s) of
the AFCS engaged, the pilot must be
able to manually recover the aircraft and
transition to the normal (Appendix B)
IFR flight profile envelope without
exceptional skill, alertness, or strength.
(e) One-Engine Inoperative (OEI)
Performance Information.
(1) The following performance
information must be provided in the
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Rotorcraft Flight Manual Supplement
(RFMS):
(i) OEI performance information and
emergency procedures, providing the
maximum weight that will provide a
minimum clearance of 15 feet above the
surface, following failure of the critical
engine in a hover. The maximum weight
must be presented as a function of the
hover height for the temperature and
pressure altitude range requested for
certification. The effects of wind must
be reflected in the hover performance
information.
(ii) Hover OGE performance with the
critical engine inoperative for OEI
continuous and time-limited power
ratings for those weights, altitudes, and
temperatures for which certification is
requested.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Note: These OEI performance requirements
do not replace performance requirements that
may be needed to comply with the
airworthiness or operational standards (14
CFR 29.865 or 14 CFR part 133) for external
loads or human external cargo.
(f) RFMS.
(1) The RFMS must contain, at a
minimum:
(i) Limitations necessary for safe
operation of the SAR system to include:
(A) Minimum crew requirements.
(B) Maximum SAR weight.
(C) Engagement criteria for each of the
SAR modes to include MUH (as
determined in paragraph (c)(3)).
(ii) Normal and emergency procedures
for operation of the SAR system (to
include operation of the hoist operator
control), with AFCS failure modes,
AFCS degraded modes, and engine
failures.
(iii) Performance information:
(A) OEI performance and height-loss.
(B) Hover OGE performance
information, utilizing OEI continuous
and time-limited power ratings.
(C) The maximum wind envelope
demonstrated in flight test.
(g) Flight Demonstration.
(1) Before approval of the SAR
system, an acceptable flight
demonstration of all the coupled SAR
modes is required.
(2) The AFCS must provide fail-safe
operations during coupled maneuvers.
The demonstration of fail-safe
operations must include a pilot
workload assessment associated with
manually flying the aircraft to an
altitude greater than 200 feet above the
surface and an airspeed of at least the
best rate of climb airspeed (Vy).
(3) For any failure condition of the
SAR system not shown to be extremely
improbable, the pilot must be able to
make a smooth transition from one
flight mode to another without
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or
strength.
(4) Failure conditions that are not
shown to be extremely improbable must
be demonstrated by analysis, ground
testing, or flight testing. For failures
demonstrated in flight, the following
normal pilot recovery times are
acceptable:
(i) Transition modes (Cruise-to-Hover/
Hover-to-Cruise) and Hover modes:
Normal pilot recognition plus 1 second.
(ii) Cruise modes: Normal pilot
recognition plus 3 seconds.
(5) All AFCS malfunctions must
include evaluation at the low-speed and
high-power flight conditions typical of
SAR operations. Additionally, AFCS
hard-over, slow-over, and oscillatory
malfunctions, particularly in yaw,
require evaluation. AFCS malfunction
testing must include a single or a
combination of failures (e.g., erroneous
data from and loss of the radio altimeter,
attitude, heading, and altitude sensors)
that are not shown to be extremely
improbable.
(6) The flight demonstration must
include the following environmental
conditions:
(i) Swell into wind.
(ii) Swell and wind from different
directions.
(iii) Cross swell.
(iv) Swell of different lengths (short
and long swell).
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 18,
2012.
Kimberly K. Smith,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–18199 Filed 7–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0675; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–120–AD; Amendment
39–17131; AD 2012–13–51]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream
Aerospace LP (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Israel Aircraft
Industries, Ltd.) Airplanes
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Certificate previously held by Israel
Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model
Gulfstream G150 airplanes. This
emergency AD was sent previously to
all known U.S. owners and operators of
these airplanes. This AD requires a onetime detailed or borescope inspection of
the left- and right-hand inboard vent
holes for debris or obstructions, and
repair if necessary. This AD was
prompted by a report indicating that an
inboard vent tube hole was completely
covered with sealant, which blocked
airflow through the vent. Under these
conditions, the rise of internal pressure
during pressure fueling or due to
thermal expansion is sufficient to
damage the wing. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct compromised
integrity of the wing structure.
DATES: This AD is effective August 13,
2012 to all persons except those persons
to whom it was made immediately
effective by emergency AD 2012–13–51,
issued on June 26, 2012, which
contained the requirements of this
amendment.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication identified in the
AD as of August 13, 2012.
We must receive comments on this
AD by September 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation, P.O. Box 2206, Mail
Station D–25, Savannah, Georgia 31402–
2206; telephone 800–810–4853; fax
912–965–3520; email
pubs@gulfstream.com; Internet https://
www.gulfstream.com/product_support/
technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm.
Examining the AD Docket
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
44113
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations Office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 145 (Friday, July 27, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44110-44113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18199]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 29
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0785; Special Conditions No. 29-027-SC]
Special Conditions: Agusta S.p.A. Model AW139 and AB139
Helicopter, Installation of a Search and Rescue (SAR) Automatic Flight
Control System (AFCS)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Agusta S.p.A.
(Agusta) Model AW139 and AB139 helicopters. These model helicopters, as
modified by Agusta, will have novel or unusual design features
associated with installing an optional SAR AFCS. The applicable
airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards the Administrator considers necessary to
show a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is July 18, 2012.
We must receive your comments by September 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number [FAA-2012-0785]
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery of Courier: Deliver comments to the ``Mail''
address between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://regulations.gov, including any personal information
the commenter provides. Using the search function of the docket Web
site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all comments
received into any FAA docket, including the name of the individual
sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement can
be found in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: You can read the background documents or comments received
at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room @12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FAA, Aircraft Certification Service,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group (ASW-111), Attn:
Stephen Barbini, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
(817) 222-5196; facsimile (817) 222-5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Reason for No Prior Notice and Comment Before Adoption
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period previously and has been derived without
substantive change from those previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a significant change from the
substance contained herein. Further, a delay in the effective date of
these special conditions would significantly delay issuance of the
design approval and thus delivery of the helicopter, which is imminent.
Therefore, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment
are unnecessary, impracticable, and contrary to the public interest,
and finds good cause exists for adopting these special conditions upon
issuance. The FAA is requesting comments to allow interested persons to
submit views that may not have been submitted in response to the prior
opportunities for comment.
Comments Invited
While we did not precede this with a notice of proposed special
conditions, we invite interested people to take part in this action by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do
so without incurring additional expense or delay. We may change these
special conditions based on the comments we receive.
Background and Discussion
On November 11, 2008, Agusta applied for a change to Type
Certificate (TC) No. R00002RD to install an optional SAR AFCS in the
Model AB139 and AW139 helicopters. The AB139 and AW139 models are
transport category helicopters certificated to Category A and Category
B requirements, and instrument flight certificated under the
requirements of Appendix B to 14 CFR part 29, Amendment 29-40.
There is a need to use dedicated AFCS upper modes, in which a fully
coupled autopilot provides operational SAR profiles, for SAR operations
conducted over water in offshore areas clear of obstructions. The SAR
modes enable the helicopter pilot to fly fully coupled maneuvers, to
include predefined search patterns during cruise flight, and to
transition from cruise flight to a stabilized hover and departure
(transition from hover to cruise flight). The SAR AFCS also includes an
auxiliary crew control that allows another crewmember (such as a hoist
operator) to have limited authority to control the helicopter's
longitudinal and lateral position during hover operations.
Flight operations conducted over water at night may have an
extremely limited visual horizon with little visual reference to the
surface even when conducted under Visual Meteorological Conditions.
Consequently, the certification requirements for SAR modes must meet
Appendix B to 14 CFR part 29 for helicopter instrument flight. While
this appendix prescribes airworthiness criteria for instrument flight,
it does not consider operations below instrument flight minimum speed
(VMINI), whereas the SAR modes allow for coupled operations
at low speed, all-azimuth flight to zero airspeed (hover).
Since SAR operations have traditionally been a public use mission,
the use of SAR modes in civil operations requires special airworthiness
standards (special conditions) to maintain a level of safety
[[Page 44111]]
consistent with Category A and Instrument Flight Rule (IFR)
certification. In this regard, 14 CFR part 29 lacks adequate
airworthiness standards for AFCS SAR mode certification to include
flight characteristics, performance, and installed equipment and
systems.
Type Certification Basis
Under 14 CFR 21.101, Agusta must show the AW139 and AB139 model
helicopters, as changed, continue to meet either the applicable
provisions of the rules incorporated by reference in TC No. R00002RD or
the applicable regulations in effect on the date of application for the
change, depending on the significance of the change as defined by 14
CFR 21.101. The regulations incorporated by reference in the TC are
commonly referred to as the ``original type certification basis.'' The
regulations incorporated by reference in R00002RD are as follows:
(a) 14 CFR 21.29 and Part 29, Amendments 29-1 through 29-45.
(b) Appendix B to Part 29, Amendment 29-40.
(c) 14 CFR part 36, Appendix H, Amendment 36-1 through Amendment
36-25.
(d) Special Condition No. 29-0010-SC, High Intensity Radiated
Fields (HIRF), dated Feb. 19, 2004.
(e) Equivalent Level of Safety Findings issued against:
(1) 14 CFR 29.1305, as documented in AB139 FAA Memo dated Dec. 20,
2004.
(2) 14 CFR 29.1321, as documented in AB139 FAA Memo dated Dec. 20,
2004.
Regulatory Basis for Special Conditions
If the Administrator finds the applicable airworthiness standards
(i.e., 14 CFR part 29) do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for the Agusta model AW139 and AB139 helicopters because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under 14 CFR 21.16.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, under
Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type certification basis under
Sec. 21.101.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the TC for that model be amended later to
include any other model that incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, or should any other model already included on the same
TC be modified to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also apply to the other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Agusta model AW139 and AB139 helicopters will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design features:
The SAR system is composed of a navigation computer with SAR modes,
an AFCS that provides coupled SAR functions, hoist operator control, a
hover speed reference system, and two radio altimeters. The AFCS
coupled SAR functions include:
(a) Hover hold at selected height above the surface.
(b) Ground speed hold.
(c) Transition down and hover to a waypoint under guidance from the
navigation computer.
(d) SAR pattern, transition down, and hover near a target over
which the helicopter has flown.
(e) Transition up, climb, and capture a cruise height.
(f) Capture and track SAR search patterns generated by the
navigation computer.
(g) Monitor the preselected hover height with automatic increase in
collective if the aircraft height drops below the safe minimum height.
These SAR modes are intended to be used over large bodies of water
in areas clear of obstructions. Further, use of the modes that
transition down from cruise to hover will include operation at
airspeeds below VMINI.
The SAR system only entails navigation, flight control, and coupled
AFCS operation of the helicopter. The system does not include the
additional equipment that may be required for over water flight or
external loads to meet other operational requirements.
Applicability
These special conditions apply to the Agusta Model AW139 and AB139
helicopters. Should Agusta apply at a later date for a change to the TC
to include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual design
feature, these special conditions would apply to that model as well
under the provisions of Sec. 21.101(d).
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on two model helicopters (i.e., AW139 and AB139 helicopters). It is not
a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 29
Aircraft, Aviation safety.
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Agusta Model AW139 and AB139
helicopters when the optional Search and Rescue (SAR) Automatic Flight
Control System (AFCS) is installed:
In addition to the part 29 certification requirements for Category
A and helicopter instrument flight (Appendix B), the following
additional requirements must be met for certification of the SAR AFCS:
(a) SAR Flight Modes. The coupled SAR flight modes must provide:
(1) Safe and controlled flight in three axes (lateral and
longitudinal position/speed and height/vertical speed) at all airspeeds
from instrument flight minimum speed (VMINI) to a hover
within the maximum demonstrated wind envelope.
(2) Automatic transition to the helicopter instrument flight
(Appendix B) envelope as part of the normal SAR mode sequencing.
(3) A pilot-selectable Go-Around mode that safely interrupts any
other coupled mode and automatically transitions the helicopter to the
instrument flight (Appendix B) envelope.
(4) A means to prevent unintended flight below a safe minimum
height. Pilot-commanded descent below the safe minimum height is
acceptable provided the alerting requirements in (b)(7)(i) alert the
pilot of this descent below safe minimum height.
(b) SAR Mode System Architecture. To support the integrity of the
SAR modes, the following system architecture is required:
(1) A system for limiting the engine power demanded by the AFCS
when any of the automatic piloting modes are engaged, so full authority
digital engine control power limitations, such as torque and
temperature, are not exceeded.
(2) A system providing the aircraft height above the surface and
final pilot-selected height at a location on the instrument panel in a
position acceptable to the FAA that will make it plainly visible to and
usable by any pilot at their station.
(3) A system providing the aircraft heading and the pilot-selected
heading at a location on the instrument panel in a position acceptable
to the FAA that will make it plainly visible to and usable by any pilot
at their station.
(4) A system providing the aircraft longitudinal and lateral ground
speeds
[[Page 44112]]
and the pilot-selected longitudinal and lateral ground speeds when used
by the AFCS in the flight envelope where airspeed indications become
unreliable. This information must be presented at a location on the
instrument panel in a position acceptable to the FAA that is plainly
visible to and usable by any pilot at their station.
(5) A system providing wind speed and wind direction when automatic
piloting modes are engaged or transitioning from one mode to another.
(6) A system that monitors for flight guidance deviations and
failures, and contains an alerting function that provides the flight
crew with enough information to take appropriate corrective action.
(7) The alerting system must provide visual or aural alerts, or
both, to the flight crew under any of the below conditions:
(i) When the stored or pilot-selected safe minimum height is
reached.
(ii) When a SAR mode system malfunction occurs.
(iii) When the AFCS changes modes automatically from one SAR mode
to another.
For normal transitions from one SAR mode to another, a single visual or
aural alert may suffice. For a SAR mode malfunction or a mode having a
time-critical component, the flight crew alerting system must activate
early enough to allow the flight crew to take timely and appropriate
action. The alerting system means must be designed to alert the flight
crew in order to minimize crew errors that could create an additional
hazard.
(8) The SAR system hoist operator control is considered a flight
control with limited authority and must comply with the following:
(i) The hoist operator control must be designed and located to
provide for convenient operation and to prevent confusion and
inadvertent operation.
(ii) The helicopter must be safely controllable by the hoist
operator control throughout the range of that control.
(iii) The hoist operator control may not interfere with the safe
operation of the helicopter.
(iv) Pilot and copilot flight controls must be able to smoothly
override the limited control authority of the hoist operator control,
without exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or strength, and without
the danger of exceeding any other limitation because of the override.
(9) The reliability of the AFCS must be related to the effects of
its failure. The occurrence of any failure condition that would prevent
continued safe flight and landing must be extremely improbable. For any
failure condition of the AFCS which is not shown to be extremely
improbable:
(i) The helicopter must be safely controllable and capable of
continued safe flight without exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or
strength. Additional unrelated probable failures affecting the control
system must be evaluated.
(ii) The AFCS must be designed so that it cannot create a hazardous
deviation in the flight path or produce hazardous loads on the
helicopter during normal operation or in the event of a malfunction or
failure, assuming corrective action begins within an appropriate period
of time. Where multiple systems are installed, subsequent malfunction
conditions must be evaluated in sequence unless their occurrence is
shown to be improbable.
(10) A functional hazard assessment and a system safety assessment
must be provided to the FAA that addresses the failure conditions
associated with SAR operations.
(i) For SAR catastrophic failure conditions, changes may be
required to the following:
(A) System architecture.
(B) Software and complex electronic hardware design assurance
levels.
(C) High Intensity Radiated Field (HIRF) test levels.
(D) Instructions for continued airworthiness.
(ii) The assessments must consider all the systems required for SAR
operations to include the AFCS, all associated AFCS sensors (for
example, radio altimeter), and primary flight displays. Electrical and
electronic systems with SAR catastrophic failure conditions (for
example, AFCS) must comply with the Sec. 29.1317(a)(4) HIRF
requirements.
(c) SAR Mode Performance Requirements.
(1) Demonstrate the SAR modes for the requested flight envelope,
including the following minimum sea-state and wind conditions:
(i) Sea State: Wave height of 2.5 meters (8.2 feet), considering
both short and long swells.
(ii) Wind: 25 knots headwind; 17 knots for all other azimuths.
(2) The selected hover height and hover velocity must be captured
(to include the transition from one captured mode to another captured
mode) accurately and smoothly and not exhibit any significant overshoot
or oscillation.
(3) The minimum use height (MUH) for the SAR modes must be no more
than the maximum loss of height following any single failure or any
combination of failures not shown to be extremely improbable, plus an
additional 15 feet. The MUH is the minimum height at which any SAR AFCS
mode may be engaged.
(4) The SAR mode system must be usable up to the maximum certified
gross weight of the aircraft or to the lower of the following weights:
(i) Maximum emergency flotation weight.
(ii) Maximum hover Out-of-Ground Effect (OGE) weight.
(iii) Maximum demonstrated weight.
(d) Flight Characteristics.
(1) The basic aircraft must meet all of the part 29 airworthiness
criteria for helicopter instrument flight (Appendix B).
(2) For SAR mode coupled flight below VMINI, at the
maximum demonstrated winds, the helicopter must be able to maintain any
required flight condition and make a smooth transition from any flight
condition to any other flight condition without requiring exceptional
piloting skill, alertness, or strength, and without exceeding the limit
load factor. This requirement also includes aircraft control through
the hoist operator's control.
(3) For SAR modes at airspeeds below VMINI, the
following requirements of Appendix B to part 29 must be met and will be
used as an extension to the IFR certification envelope of the basic
aircraft:
(i) Static Longitudinal Stability: the requirements of paragraph IV
of Appendix B are not applicable.
(ii) Static Lateral-Directional Stability: The requirements of
paragraph V of Appendix B are not applicable.
(iii) Dynamic Stability: The requirements of paragraph VI of
Appendix B are replaced with the following two paragraphs:
(A) Any oscillation must be damped and any aperiodic response must
not double in amplitude in less than 10 seconds. This requirement must
also be met with degraded upper mode(s) of the AFCS. An ``upper mode''
is a mode that utilizes a fully coupled autopilot to provide an
operational SAR profile.
(B) After any upset, the AFCS must return the aircraft to the last
commanded position within 10 seconds or less.
(4) With any of the upper mode(s) of the AFCS engaged, the pilot
must be able to manually recover the aircraft and transition to the
normal (Appendix B) IFR flight profile envelope without exceptional
skill, alertness, or strength.
(e) One-Engine Inoperative (OEI) Performance Information.
(1) The following performance information must be provided in the
[[Page 44113]]
Rotorcraft Flight Manual Supplement (RFMS):
(i) OEI performance information and emergency procedures, providing
the maximum weight that will provide a minimum clearance of 15 feet
above the surface, following failure of the critical engine in a hover.
The maximum weight must be presented as a function of the hover height
for the temperature and pressure altitude range requested for
certification. The effects of wind must be reflected in the hover
performance information.
(ii) Hover OGE performance with the critical engine inoperative for
OEI continuous and time-limited power ratings for those weights,
altitudes, and temperatures for which certification is requested.
Note: These OEI performance requirements do not replace
performance requirements that may be needed to comply with the
airworthiness or operational standards (14 CFR 29.865 or 14 CFR part
133) for external loads or human external cargo.
(f) RFMS.
(1) The RFMS must contain, at a minimum:
(i) Limitations necessary for safe operation of the SAR system to
include:
(A) Minimum crew requirements.
(B) Maximum SAR weight.
(C) Engagement criteria for each of the SAR modes to include MUH
(as determined in paragraph (c)(3)).
(ii) Normal and emergency procedures for operation of the SAR
system (to include operation of the hoist operator control), with AFCS
failure modes, AFCS degraded modes, and engine failures.
(iii) Performance information:
(A) OEI performance and height-loss.
(B) Hover OGE performance information, utilizing OEI continuous and
time-limited power ratings.
(C) The maximum wind envelope demonstrated in flight test.
(g) Flight Demonstration.
(1) Before approval of the SAR system, an acceptable flight
demonstration of all the coupled SAR modes is required.
(2) The AFCS must provide fail-safe operations during coupled
maneuvers. The demonstration of fail-safe operations must include a
pilot workload assessment associated with manually flying the aircraft
to an altitude greater than 200 feet above the surface and an airspeed
of at least the best rate of climb airspeed (Vy).
(3) For any failure condition of the SAR system not shown to be
extremely improbable, the pilot must be able to make a smooth
transition from one flight mode to another without exceptional piloting
skill, alertness, or strength.
(4) Failure conditions that are not shown to be extremely
improbable must be demonstrated by analysis, ground testing, or flight
testing. For failures demonstrated in flight, the following normal
pilot recovery times are acceptable:
(i) Transition modes (Cruise-to-Hover/Hover-to-Cruise) and Hover
modes: Normal pilot recognition plus 1 second.
(ii) Cruise modes: Normal pilot recognition plus 3 seconds.
(5) All AFCS malfunctions must include evaluation at the low-speed
and high-power flight conditions typical of SAR operations.
Additionally, AFCS hard-over, slow-over, and oscillatory malfunctions,
particularly in yaw, require evaluation. AFCS malfunction testing must
include a single or a combination of failures (e.g., erroneous data
from and loss of the radio altimeter, attitude, heading, and altitude
sensors) that are not shown to be extremely improbable.
(6) The flight demonstration must include the following
environmental conditions:
(i) Swell into wind.
(ii) Swell and wind from different directions.
(iii) Cross swell.
(iv) Swell of different lengths (short and long swell).
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 18, 2012.
Kimberly K. Smith,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-18199 Filed 7-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P