Establishment of Class E Airspace; Roundup, MT, 44120-44121 [2012-18146]
Download as PDF
44120
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
2012–15–04 EUROCOPTER FRANCE:
Amendment 39–17133; Docket No.
FAA–2012–0766; Directorate Identifier
2012–SW–056–AD.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(a) Applicability
14 CFR Part 71
This AD applies to Model EC155B1
helicopters with an automated flight control
system part number (P/N) 416–00297–161
and software level P/N 704A47–1332–79
installed, certificated in any category.
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0274; Airspace
Docket No. 12–ANM–4]
(b) Unsafe Condition
AGENCY:
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
intermittent uncommanded roll oscillations
during coupled instrument landing system
and localizer approaches with the autopilot
coupled, which could result in subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
Federal Aviation Administration
Establishment of Class E Airspace;
Roundup, MT
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
Before further flight, revise the Operating
Limitations section of Eurocopter EC 155B1
Flight Manual Section 2.1, by inserting a
copy of this AD into the Flight Manual or by
making pen and ink changes as follows.
Under paragraph 5, Minimum Flight Crew/
Maximum Personnel Transport Capability,
beneath ‘‘Minimum flight crew,’’ remove the
phrase ‘‘—one pilot in right-hand seat’’ and
replace it as follows:
—VFR: One pilot in right-hand seat.
—IFR: Two pilots required.
This action establishes Class
E airspace at Roundup Airport,
Roundup, MT, to accommodate aircraft
using new Area Navigation (RNAV)
Global Positioning System (GPS)
standard instrument approach
procedures at Roundup Airport. This
improves the safety and management of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations
at the airport.
DATES: Effective date, 0901 UTC,
September 20, 2012. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057;
telephone (425) 203–4537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
History
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Clark Davenport,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management
Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email
clark.davenport@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
On May 9, 2012, the FAA published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to
establish controlled airspace at
Roundup, MT (77 FR 27148). Interested
parties were invited to participate in
this rulemaking effort by submitting
written comments on the proposal to the
FAA. The FAA received three
comments, all from the National
Business Aviation Association (NBAA).
The NBAA comments recommended
that the FAA lower some of the adjacent
Class E airspace, which is beyond the
TAAs, down to 1,200 feet above the
surface to accommodate orderly en
route descent into the respective TAA
because the NBAA feels that aircraft
will not have enough airspace to access
the TAAs. The airspace in question
includes the following areas where
Class E begins at 14,500 feet MSL: The
large area to the north, the two smaller
areas to the west, and the small area to
the east. The NBAA is also concerned
that the Minimum Instrument Flight
Rules Altitude (MIA) outside the 1,200
(c) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective August 13,
2012.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
(g) Subject
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 2210: Autopilot System.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 16,
2012.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–17960 Filed 7–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
feet above the surface would affect air
traffic services into the TAAs from the
north, west and east. Finally, the
commenter points out that extending
the Class E 1,200-foot area would
provide relief to Salt Lake City Air
Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC).
The FAA believes that lowering this
airspace is outside the scope of this
rulemaking at this time, and would not
serve the immediate purpose of
establishing the airspace necessary for
the safety of aircraft within the
Roundup, MT, airport area.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6005, of FAA
Order 7400.9V dated August 9, 2011,
and effective September 15, 2011, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in that Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by
establishing Class E airspace, extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface,
at Roundup Airport, to accommodate
IFR aircraft executing new RNAV (GPS)
standard instrument approach
procedures at the airport. This action is
necessary for the safety and
management of IFR operations.
The FAA has determined this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation because the
anticipated impact is minimal. This rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act because this
is a routine matter that will only affect
air traffic procedures and air navigation.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106 discusses the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 145 / Friday, July 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority because it
establishes additional controlled
airspace at Roundup Airport, Roundup,
MT.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on July 19,
2012.
Robert Henry,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
Environmental Review
[FR Doc. 2012–18146 Filed 7–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 311a. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated August 9, 2011, and effective
September 15, 2011 is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
ANM MT E5 Roundup, MT [New]
Roundup Airport, MT
(Lat. 46°28′30″ N., long. 108°32′36″ W.)
That airspace extending from 700 feet
above the surface within a 7.6-mile radius of
the Roundup Airport; that airspace extending
upward from 1,200 feet above the surface
within an area bounded by a line beginning
at lat. 46°53′00″ N., long. 109°17′00″ W.; lat.
47°04′00″ N., long. 108°04′00″ W.; lat.
46°51′00″ N., long. 107°39′00″ W.; lat.
46°32′00″ N., long. 107°27′00″ W.; lat.
46°06′00″ N., long. 107°42′00″ W.; lat.
45°54′00″ N., long. 109°01′00″ W.; lat.
46°10′00″ N., long. 109°33′00″ W.; lat.
46°32′00″ N., long. 109°37′00″ W.; thence to
the point of beginning.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
29 CFR Part 1978
[Docket Number: OSHA–2008–0026]
RIN 1218–AC36
Procedures for the Handling of
Retaliation Complaints Under the
Employee Protection Provision of the
Surface Transportation Assistance Act
of 1982 (STAA), as Amended
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This document provides the
final text of regulations governing
employee protection (or
‘‘whistleblower’’) claims under the
Surface Transportation Assistance Act
of 1982 (STAA), as amended,
implementing statutory changes to
STAA enacted into law on August 3,
2007, as part of the Implementing
Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act of 2007. On August 31,
2010, the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA)
published an interim final rule (IFR) for
STAA whistleblower complaints in the
Federal Register and requested public
comment on the IFR. This final rule
implements changes to the IFR in
response to comments received, where
appropriate. This final rule also
finalizes changes to the procedures for
handling whistleblower complaints
under STAA that were designed to make
them more consistent with OSHA’s
procedures for handling retaliation
complaints under Section 211 of the
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and
other whistleblower provisions. It also
sets forth interpretations of STAA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on July
27, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Dillon, Director, Office of the
Whistleblower Protection Program,
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–3112, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone (202) 693–2199. This is not a
toll-free number. This Federal Register
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44121
publication is available in alternative
formats: large print, electronic file on
computer disk (Word Perfect, ASCII,
Mates with Duxbury Braille System),
and audiotape.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Among other provisions of the
Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (9/11
Commission Act), Public Law 110–53,
121 Stat. 266, section 1536 re-enacted
the whistleblower provision in STAA,
49 U.S.C. 31105 (previously referred to
as ‘‘Section 405’’), with certain
amendments. The regulatory revisions
described herein reflect these statutory
changes and also seek to clarify and
improve OSHA’s procedures for
handling STAA whistleblower claims,
as well as to set forth interpretations of
STAA. To the extent possible within the
bounds of applicable statutory language,
these revised regulations are designed to
be consistent with the procedures
applied to claims under other
whistleblower statutes administered by
OSHA, including Section 211 of the
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974
(ERA), 42 U.S.C. 5851, the Wendell H.
Ford Aviation Investment and Reform
Act for the 21st Century (AIR21), 49
U.S.C. 42121, and Title VIII of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), 18
U.S.C. 1514A. Responsibility for
receiving and investigating complaints
under 49 U.S.C. 31105 has been
delegated by the Secretary of Labor
(Secretary) to the Assistant Secretary of
Labor for Occupational Safety and
Health (Assistant Secretary). Secretary’s
Order 1–2012 (Jan. 18, 2012), 77 FR
3912 (Jan. 25, 2012). Hearings on
determinations by the Assistant
Secretary are conducted by the Office of
Administrative Law Judges, and appeals
from decisions by administrative law
judges (ALJs) are decided by the
Department of Labor’s Administrative
Review Board (ARB) (Secretary’s Order
1–2010), 75 FR 3924–01 (Jan. 25, 2010).
II. Summary of Statutory Changes to
STAA Whistleblower Provisions
The 9/11 Commission Act amended
49 U.S.C. 31105, and the related
definitions provision at 49 U.S.C. 31101,
by making the changes described below.
Expansion of Protected Activity
Before passage of the 9/11
Commission Act, STAA protected
certain activities related to commercial
motor vehicle safety. The 9/11
Commission Act expanded STAA’s
coverage to commercial motor vehicle
security. In particular, 49 U.S.C.
31105(a)(1)(A) previously made it
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 145 (Friday, July 27, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44120-44121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18146]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0274; Airspace Docket No. 12-ANM-4]
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Roundup, MT
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace at Roundup Airport,
Roundup, MT, to accommodate aircraft using new Area Navigation (RNAV)
Global Positioning System (GPS) standard instrument approach procedures
at Roundup Airport. This improves the safety and management of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.
DATES: Effective date, 0901 UTC, September 20, 2012. The Director of
the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action
under 1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9
and publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone (425) 203-4537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On May 9, 2012, the FAA published in the Federal Register a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to establish controlled airspace at
Roundup, MT (77 FR 27148). Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on
the proposal to the FAA. The FAA received three comments, all from the
National Business Aviation Association (NBAA).
The NBAA comments recommended that the FAA lower some of the
adjacent Class E airspace, which is beyond the TAAs, down to 1,200 feet
above the surface to accommodate orderly en route descent into the
respective TAA because the NBAA feels that aircraft will not have
enough airspace to access the TAAs. The airspace in question includes
the following areas where Class E begins at 14,500 feet MSL: The large
area to the north, the two smaller areas to the west, and the small
area to the east. The NBAA is also concerned that the Minimum
Instrument Flight Rules Altitude (MIA) outside the 1,200 feet above the
surface would affect air traffic services into the TAAs from the north,
west and east. Finally, the commenter points out that extending the
Class E 1,200-foot area would provide relief to Salt Lake City Air
Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC).
The FAA believes that lowering this airspace is outside the scope
of this rulemaking at this time, and would not serve the immediate
purpose of establishing the airspace necessary for the safety of
aircraft within the Roundup, MT, airport area.
Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005, of
FAA Order 7400.9V dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in that Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
Part 71 by establishing Class E airspace, extending upward from 700
feet above the surface, at Roundup Airport, to accommodate IFR aircraft
executing new RNAV (GPS) standard instrument approach procedures at the
airport. This action is necessary for the safety and management of IFR
operations.
The FAA has determined this regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments
are necessary to keep them operationally current. Therefore, this
regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation because
the anticipated impact is minimal. This rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act because this is a
routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation. The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation
safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106
discusses the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of
[[Page 44121]]
airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it establishes additional controlled airspace at Roundup Airport,
Roundup, MT.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011 is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * *
ANM MT E5 Roundup, MT [New]
Roundup Airport, MT
(Lat. 46[deg]28[min]30'' N., long. 108[deg]32[min]36'' W.)
That airspace extending from 700 feet above the surface within a
7.6-mile radius of the Roundup Airport; that airspace extending
upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within an area bounded by a
line beginning at lat. 46[deg]53[min]00'' N., long.
109[deg]17[min]00'' W.; lat. 47[deg]04[min]00'' N., long.
108[deg]04[min]00'' W.; lat. 46[deg]51[min]00'' N., long.
107[deg]39[min]00'' W.; lat. 46[deg]32[min]00'' N., long.
107[deg]27[min]00'' W.; lat. 46[deg]06[min]00'' N., long.
107[deg]42[min]00'' W.; lat. 45[deg]54[min]00'' N., long.
109[deg]01[min]00'' W.; lat. 46[deg]10[min]00'' N., long.
109[deg]33[min]00'' W.; lat. 46[deg]32[min]00'' N., long.
109[deg]37[min]00'' W.; thence to the point of beginning.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on July 19, 2012.
Robert Henry,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2012-18146 Filed 7-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P