Federal Acquisition Regulation; Changes to Time-and-Materials and Labor-Hour Contracts and Orders, 43780-43782 [2012-18276]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
43780
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules
method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
Trent B. Harkrader,
Division Chief, Telecommunications Access
Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2012–18273 Filed 7–25–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
I. Background
48 CFR Parts 8, 12, 16, and 52
[FAR Case 2011–025; Docket 2011–0025;
Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM28
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Changes to Time-and-Materials and
Labor-Hour Contracts and Orders
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCIES:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to provide
additional guidance when raising the
ceiling price or otherwise changing the
scope of work for a time-and-materials
(T&M) or labor-hour (LH) contract or
order.
SUMMARY:
Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat at one of the addressees
shown below on or before September
24, 2012 to be considered in the
formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to FAR Case 2011–025 by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching for ‘‘FAR Case 2011–025’’.
Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
that corresponds with ‘‘FAR Case 2011–
025.’’ Follow the instructions provided
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:26 Jul 25, 2012
Jkt 226001
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘FAR Case 2011–
025’’ on your attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275
First Street NE., 7th Floor, Washington,
DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAR Case 2011–025, in all
correspondence related to this case. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Michael O. Jackson, Procurement
Analyst, at 202–208–4949, for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite
FAR Case 2011–025.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing
to revise the FAR to implement a policy
that provides additional guidance to
address actions required when raising
the ceiling price for a T&M or LH
contract or order. FAR Case 2009–043,
‘‘Time-and-Materials and Labor-Hour
Contracts for Commercial Items’’, was
published as a final rule in the Federal
Register at 77 FR 194 on January 3,
2012. As a result of FAR case 2009–043,
the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council
and the Defense Acquisition Regulations
Council (Councils) were concerned that
contracting officers may erroneously
conclude that a Determination and
Findings (D&F) is always sufficient to
justify a change in the ceiling price.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This FAR case provides additional
guidance to address actions required
when raising the ceiling price or
otherwise changing the general scope of
a T&M or LH contract or order. The case
provides guidance to address this issue
for the respective parts of the FAR
addressing T&M and LH contracts or
orders, such as FAR 8.404, 12.207, and
16.601.
The Government Accountability
Office stated within Matter of Specialty
Marine, Inc., B–293871, B–293871.2,
2004 Comp. Gen. Proc. Dec. P130, (June
17, 2004) that: ‘‘When a protester alleges
that an order is outside the scope of the
contract, we analyze the protest in
essentially the same manner as those in
which the protester argues that a
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
contract modification is outside the
scope of the underlying contract. The
fundamental issue is whether issuance
of the task or delivery order in effect
circumvents the general statutory
requirement under the Competition in
Contracting Act (CICA) that agencies
‘obtain full and open competition
through the use of competitive
procedures’ when procuring their
requirements. See 10 U.S.C.
2304(a)(1)(A) (2000).
In determining whether a task or
delivery order (or modification) is
outside the scope of the underlying
contract, and thus falls within CICA’s
competition requirement, our Office
examines whether the order is
materially different from the original
contract. Evidence of a material
difference is found by reviewing the
circumstances attending the original
procurement; any changes in the type of
work, performance period, and costs
between the contract as awarded and
the order as issued; and whether the
original solicitation effectively advised
offerors of the potential for the type of
orders issued. Overall, the inquiry is
whether the order is one which
potential offerors would have
reasonably anticipated.’’
The Councils propose the following
changes:
FAR 8.404(h)(3)(iv). This paragraph is
revised to require analysis and
documentation for changes in T&M or
LH orders and to clarify that changes in
the general scope should be justified as
non-competitive new work. In addition,
a clarification is added that if modifying
an order to add open market items, the
contracting officer must also comply
with the requirements at FAR 8.402(f).
FAR 12.207(b)(1)(ii)(C). This
paragraph is revised to require analysis
and documentation for changes in T&M
or LH contracts or orders and to clarify
that changes in the general scope should
be justified as non-competitive new
work. The new proposed language
distinguishes between changes that
modify the general scope of a contract
and changes that modify the general
scope of an order. For the changes that
modify the general scope of the contract,
contracting officers are advised to
follow the procedures at FAR 6.303. For
the changes that modify the general
scope of an order, contracting officers
are advised to follow the procedures at
FAR 8.405–6 for orders issued under the
Federal Supply Schedules. For the
orders issued under multiple award task
and delivery order contracts, contracting
officers are advised to follow the
procedures at FAR 16.505(b)(2).
FAR 16.505(b)(4) and (5). These
paragraphs are added to reference
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
additional requirements for cost
reimbursement, T&M or LH orders.
FAR 16.601. This section is revised to
require analysis and documentation for
changes in T&M or LH contracts or
orders and to clarify that changes in the
general scope should be justified as noncompetitive new work. FAR 16.601(d)
has also been amended to make it clear
that a D&F is required for T&M orders.
This FAR change will clarify that a T&M
D&F is required for each noncommercial item T&M order under a
part 16 indefinite-delivery indefinitequantity (IDIQ) contract. This change is
necessary both to keep part 16 parallel
with part 8 (which requires a D&F for
each part 8 T&M order) and to clarify an
unintended lack of clarity in the 2006
FAR changes that rewrote much of the
T&M policies in the FAR (see FAC
2005–15, published in the Federal
Register at 71 FR 74656 on December
12, 2006). Currently, only part 12
includes a direct requirement for T&M
orders to be authorized by a T&M D&F,
but this applies only to commercial
items. This FAR case is adding a
clarification to part 8 to repeat that
policy to ensure that part 8 T&M orders
are also each authorized by a T&M D&F.
With this case, part 16 is also being
changed to explicitly require T&M D&Fs
for orders.
FAR 16.601(e). The new proposed
language distinguishes between changes
that modify the general scope of a
contract and changes that modify the
general scope of an order. For the
changes that modify the general scope of
the contract, contracting officers are
advised to follow the procedures at FAR
6.303. For the changes that modify the
general scope of an order, contracting
officers are advised to follow the
procedures at FAR 8.405–6 for orders
issued under the Federal Supply
Schedules. For the orders issued under
multiple award task and delivery order
contracts, contracting officers are
advised to follow the procedures at FAR
16.505(b)(2).
III. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jul 25, 2012
Jkt 226001
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The change may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is
summarized as follows:
The purpose of this case is to clarify the
procedures necessary to raise the ceiling
price of a time-and-materials (T&M) or laborhour (LH) contract or order.
In finalizing FAR rule 2009–043 ‘‘Timeand-Materials and Labor-Hour Contracts for
Commercial Items’’ it became apparent that
the guidance in the FAR on raising the
ceiling price for a T&M or LH contract or
order was not clear or consistent throughout
the FAR. This case was opened to clarify the
process and necessary documentation when
raising the ceiling price for these contracts or
orders.
This rule deals with the administration of
T&M and LH contracts and orders and most
likely will not have a direct effect on
contractors. In FY 2011, the Federal
Government awarded 23,023 T&M and LH
contracts and orders of which 6,315 went to
small businesses. This rule is not likely to
affect how many large and small businesses
are awarded this type of contract.
This rule does not add any new
information collection requirements.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any other Federal rules.
No alternatives were determined that will
accomplish the objectives of the rule.
The Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting a copy of the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration. A copy
of the IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat. The Councils
invite comments from small business
concerns and other interested parties on
the expected impact of this rule on
small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by this rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested
parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610
(FAR Case 2011–025) in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain
any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43781
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 8, 12,
16, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: July 20, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
propose amending 48 CFR parts 8, 12,
16, and 52 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 8, 12, 16, and 52 is revised to read
as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
PART 8—REQUIRED SOURCES OF
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
2. Amend section 8.404 by revising
paragraph (h)(3)(iv) to read as follows:
8.404
Use of Federal Supply Schedules.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) Prior to an increase in the ceiling
price of a time-and-materials or laborhour order, the ordering activity shall—
(A) Conduct an analysis of pricing
and other relevant factors to determine
if the action is in the best interest of the
Government and document the order
file;
(B) Follow the procedures at 8.405–6
for a change that modifies the general
scope of the order; and
(C) Comply with the requirements at
8.402(f) when modifying an order to add
open market items.
PART 12—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
3. Amend section 12.207 by revising
paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(C) to read as follows:
12.207
Contract type.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) Prior to increasing the ceiling
price of a time-and-materials or laborhour contract or order, shall—
(1) Conduct an analysis of pricing and
other relevant factors to determine if the
action is in the best interest of the
Government;
(2) Document the decision in the
contract or order file; and
(3) When making a change that
modifies the general scope of—
(i) A contract, follow the procedures
at 6.303;
(ii) An order issued under the Federal
Supply Schedules, follow the
procedures at 8.405–6; or
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
43782
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(iii) An order issued under multiple
award task and delivery order contracts,
follow the procedures at 16.505(b)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 16—TYPE OF CONTRACTS
16.504
[Amended]
4. Amend section 16.504 by removing
from paragraph (a)(4)(v) ‘‘(see
16.505(b)(6))’’ and adding ‘‘(see
16.505(b)(8))’’ in its place.
5. Amend section 16.505 by—
a. Removing from paragraph
(b)(1)(iv)(E) ‘‘paragraph (b)(4)’’ and
adding ‘‘paragraph (b)(6)’’ in its place;
b. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(4)
through paragraphs (b)(6) as paragraphs
(b)(6) through (b)(8), respectively; and
c. Adding new paragraphs (b)(4) and
(b)(5).
The additions read as follows:
16.505
Ordering.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) For additional requirements for
cost reimbursement orders see
16.301–3.
(5) For additional requirements for
time-and-materials or labor-hour orders,
see 16.601(e).
*
*
*
*
*
6. Amend section 16.601 by—
a. Removing from paragraph (c)(2)(i)
‘‘(see 16.601(e)(1))’’ and adding ‘‘(see
16.601(f)(1))’’ in its place;
b. Revising paragraph (d) introductory
text and paragraph (d)(2);
c. Redesignating paragraph (e) as
paragraph (f); and
d. Adding a new paragraph (e),
The revisions and addition read as
follows.
16.601
Time-and-materials contracts.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Limitations. A time-and-materials
contract or order may be used only if—
*
*
*
*
*
(2) The contract or order includes a
ceiling price that the contractor exceeds
at its own risk. Also see 12.207(b) for
further limitations on use of time-andmaterials or labor-hour contracts for
acquisition of commercial items.
(e) Post award requirements. Prior to
an increase in the ceiling price of a
time-and-materials or labor-hour
contract or order, the contracting officer
shall—
(1) Conduct an analysis of pricing and
other relevant factors to determine if the
action is in the best interest of the
Government;
(2) Document the decision in the
contract or order file; and
(3) When making a change that
modifies the general scope of—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 Jul 25, 2012
Jkt 226001
(i) A contract, follow the procedures
at 6.303;
(ii) An order issued under the Federal
Supply Schedules, follow the
procedures at 8.405–6; or
(iii) An order issued under multiple
award task and delivery order contracts,
follow the procedures at 16.505(b)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
52.216–29
[Amended]
7. Amend section 52.216–29 by
removing from the introductory
paragraph ‘‘16.601(e)(1)’’ and adding
‘‘16.601(f)(1)’’ in its place.
52.216–30
[Amended]
8. Amend section 52.216–30 by
removing from the introductory
paragraph ‘‘16.601(e)(2)’’ and adding
‘‘16.601(f)(2)’’ in its place.
52.216–31
[Amended]
9. Amend section 52.216–31 by
removing from the introductory
paragraph ‘‘16.601(e)(3)’’ and adding
‘‘16.601(f)(3)’’ in its place.
[FR Doc. 2012–18276 Filed 7–25–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
48 CFR Parts 1401, 1452, and 1480
RIN 1090–AB03
Acquisition Regulations; Buy Indian
Act; Procedures for Contracting
Assistant Secretary for Policy,
Management and Budget, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Interior proposes to issue regulations
guiding implementation of the Buy
Indian Act, which provides the Bureau
of Indian Affairs with authority to set
aside procurement contracts for Indianowned and controlled businesses. This
rule supplements the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the
Department of the Interior Acquisition
Regulations (DIAR).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 24, 2012. Tribal
consultation meetings to discuss this
rule will take place on Tuesday, August
14, 2012, from 8 a.m. to noon;
Wednesday, August 15, 2012, from
3 p.m. to 6 p.m.; Tuesday, August 21,
2012, from 8 a.m. to noon; and
Thursday, August 23, 2012, from 8 a.m.
to noon.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may submit comments,
identified by the Number by any of the
following methods:
• Federal rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Email: consultation@bia.gov.
• Mail or hand-delivery: Elizabeth
Appel, Office of Regulatory Affairs &
Collaborative Action—Indian Affairs,
U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C
Street NW., MS–4141, Washington, DC
20240
• See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice for
the locations of the tribal consultation
meetings.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonodev Chaudhuri, Office of the
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs,
(202) 208–7163;
jonodev.chaudhuri@bia.gov; or David
Brown, Office of Acquisitions—Indian
Affairs, (703) 390–6605,
David.Brown@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Background
II. Tribal Consultations Planned
III. Statutory Authority
IV. Overview of Proposed Rule
V. Development of Proposed Rule
A. Prior Publication and Comment
Solicitation
B. Summary of Comments
1. Goals for Set-Asides
2. Consistency With the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
3. Definitions
4. Indian Economic Enterprise Definition
and Representation
5. Restrictions on Construction
6. Deviations
7. Subcontracting
8. Indian Preference Requirements
9. Buy Indian Implementation by Other
Bureaus
10. Other
VI. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Takings Implications (Executive Order
12630)
F. Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
G. Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175)
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
J. National Environmental Policy Act
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
L. Clarity of This Regulation
M. Public Availability of Comments
I. Background
The Bureau of Indian Affairs has
obtained services and supplies from
Indian sources using the Buy Indian
Program since 1965, based on policy
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 144 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43780-43782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18276]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 8, 12, 16, and 52
[FAR Case 2011-025; Docket 2011-0025; Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AM28
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Changes to Time-and-Materials and
Labor-Hour Contracts and Orders
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to provide additional guidance when
raising the ceiling price or otherwise changing the scope of work for a
time-and-materials (T&M) or labor-hour (LH) contract or order.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addressees shown below on or
before September 24, 2012 to be considered in the formation of the
final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2011-025 by any of
the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for ``FAR Case
2011-025''. Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with
``FAR Case 2011-025.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit
a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any),
and ``FAR Case 2011-025'' on your attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275 First Street NE., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2011-
025, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, at 202-208-4949, for
clarification of content. For information pertaining to status or
publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat at 202-501-
4755. Please cite FAR Case 2011-025.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to revise the FAR to implement a
policy that provides additional guidance to address actions required
when raising the ceiling price for a T&M or LH contract or order. FAR
Case 2009-043, ``Time-and-Materials and Labor-Hour Contracts for
Commercial Items'', was published as a final rule in the Federal
Register at 77 FR 194 on January 3, 2012. As a result of FAR case 2009-
043, the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) were concerned that
contracting officers may erroneously conclude that a Determination and
Findings (D&F) is always sufficient to justify a change in the ceiling
price.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This FAR case provides additional guidance to address actions
required when raising the ceiling price or otherwise changing the
general scope of a T&M or LH contract or order. The case provides
guidance to address this issue for the respective parts of the FAR
addressing T&M and LH contracts or orders, such as FAR 8.404, 12.207,
and 16.601.
The Government Accountability Office stated within Matter of
Specialty Marine, Inc., B-293871, B-293871.2, 2004 Comp. Gen. Proc.
Dec. P130, (June 17, 2004) that: ``When a protester alleges that an
order is outside the scope of the contract, we analyze the protest in
essentially the same manner as those in which the protester argues that
a contract modification is outside the scope of the underlying
contract. The fundamental issue is whether issuance of the task or
delivery order in effect circumvents the general statutory requirement
under the Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) that agencies `obtain
full and open competition through the use of competitive procedures'
when procuring their requirements. See 10 U.S.C. 2304(a)(1)(A) (2000).
In determining whether a task or delivery order (or modification)
is outside the scope of the underlying contract, and thus falls within
CICA's competition requirement, our Office examines whether the order
is materially different from the original contract. Evidence of a
material difference is found by reviewing the circumstances attending
the original procurement; any changes in the type of work, performance
period, and costs between the contract as awarded and the order as
issued; and whether the original solicitation effectively advised
offerors of the potential for the type of orders issued. Overall, the
inquiry is whether the order is one which potential offerors would have
reasonably anticipated.''
The Councils propose the following changes:
FAR 8.404(h)(3)(iv). This paragraph is revised to require analysis
and documentation for changes in T&M or LH orders and to clarify that
changes in the general scope should be justified as non-competitive new
work. In addition, a clarification is added that if modifying an order
to add open market items, the contracting officer must also comply with
the requirements at FAR 8.402(f).
FAR 12.207(b)(1)(ii)(C). This paragraph is revised to require
analysis and documentation for changes in T&M or LH contracts or orders
and to clarify that changes in the general scope should be justified as
non-competitive new work. The new proposed language distinguishes
between changes that modify the general scope of a contract and changes
that modify the general scope of an order. For the changes that modify
the general scope of the contract, contracting officers are advised to
follow the procedures at FAR 6.303. For the changes that modify the
general scope of an order, contracting officers are advised to follow
the procedures at FAR 8.405-6 for orders issued under the Federal
Supply Schedules. For the orders issued under multiple award task and
delivery order contracts, contracting officers are advised to follow
the procedures at FAR 16.505(b)(2).
FAR 16.505(b)(4) and (5). These paragraphs are added to reference
[[Page 43781]]
additional requirements for cost reimbursement, T&M or LH orders.
FAR 16.601. This section is revised to require analysis and
documentation for changes in T&M or LH contracts or orders and to
clarify that changes in the general scope should be justified as non-
competitive new work. FAR 16.601(d) has also been amended to make it
clear that a D&F is required for T&M orders. This FAR change will
clarify that a T&M D&F is required for each non-commercial item T&M
order under a part 16 indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ)
contract. This change is necessary both to keep part 16 parallel with
part 8 (which requires a D&F for each part 8 T&M order) and to clarify
an unintended lack of clarity in the 2006 FAR changes that rewrote much
of the T&M policies in the FAR (see FAC 2005-15, published in the
Federal Register at 71 FR 74656 on December 12, 2006). Currently, only
part 12 includes a direct requirement for T&M orders to be authorized
by a T&M D&F, but this applies only to commercial items. This FAR case
is adding a clarification to part 8 to repeat that policy to ensure
that part 8 T&M orders are also each authorized by a T&M D&F. With this
case, part 16 is also being changed to explicitly require T&M D&Fs for
orders.
FAR 16.601(e). The new proposed language distinguishes between
changes that modify the general scope of a contract and changes that
modify the general scope of an order. For the changes that modify the
general scope of the contract, contracting officers are advised to
follow the procedures at FAR 6.303. For the changes that modify the
general scope of an order, contracting officers are advised to follow
the procedures at FAR 8.405-6 for orders issued under the Federal
Supply Schedules. For the orders issued under multiple award task and
delivery order contracts, contracting officers are advised to follow
the procedures at FAR 16.505(b)(2).
III. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The change may have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is summarized as follows:
The purpose of this case is to clarify the procedures necessary
to raise the ceiling price of a time-and-materials (T&M) or labor-
hour (LH) contract or order.
In finalizing FAR rule 2009-043 ``Time-and-Materials and Labor-
Hour Contracts for Commercial Items'' it became apparent that the
guidance in the FAR on raising the ceiling price for a T&M or LH
contract or order was not clear or consistent throughout the FAR.
This case was opened to clarify the process and necessary
documentation when raising the ceiling price for these contracts or
orders.
This rule deals with the administration of T&M and LH contracts
and orders and most likely will not have a direct effect on
contractors. In FY 2011, the Federal Government awarded 23,023 T&M
and LH contracts and orders of which 6,315 went to small businesses.
This rule is not likely to affect how many large and small
businesses are awarded this type of contract.
This rule does not add any new information collection
requirements.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
No alternatives were determined that will accomplish the
objectives of the rule.
The Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting a copy of the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy of the IRFA may
be obtained from the Regulatory Secretariat. The Councils invite
comments from small business concerns and other interested parties on
the expected impact of this rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR Case 2011-025) in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 8, 12, 16, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: July 20, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA propose amending 48 CFR parts 8, 12,
16, and 52 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 8, 12, 16, and 52 is
revised to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
PART 8--REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
2. Amend section 8.404 by revising paragraph (h)(3)(iv) to read as
follows:
8.404 Use of Federal Supply Schedules.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) Prior to an increase in the ceiling price of a time-and-
materials or labor-hour order, the ordering activity shall--
(A) Conduct an analysis of pricing and other relevant factors to
determine if the action is in the best interest of the Government and
document the order file;
(B) Follow the procedures at 8.405-6 for a change that modifies the
general scope of the order; and
(C) Comply with the requirements at 8.402(f) when modifying an
order to add open market items.
PART 12--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS
3. Amend section 12.207 by revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(C) to read
as follows:
12.207 Contract type.
* * * * *
(b)(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) Prior to increasing the ceiling price of a time-and-materials
or labor-hour contract or order, shall--
(1) Conduct an analysis of pricing and other relevant factors to
determine if the action is in the best interest of the Government;
(2) Document the decision in the contract or order file; and
(3) When making a change that modifies the general scope of--
(i) A contract, follow the procedures at 6.303;
(ii) An order issued under the Federal Supply Schedules, follow the
procedures at 8.405-6; or
[[Page 43782]]
(iii) An order issued under multiple award task and delivery order
contracts, follow the procedures at 16.505(b)(2).
* * * * *
PART 16--TYPE OF CONTRACTS
16.504 [Amended]
4. Amend section 16.504 by removing from paragraph (a)(4)(v) ``(see
16.505(b)(6))'' and adding ``(see 16.505(b)(8))'' in its place.
5. Amend section 16.505 by--
a. Removing from paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(E) ``paragraph (b)(4)'' and
adding ``paragraph (b)(6)'' in its place;
b. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(4) through paragraphs (b)(6) as
paragraphs (b)(6) through (b)(8), respectively; and
c. Adding new paragraphs (b)(4) and (b)(5).
The additions read as follows:
16.505 Ordering.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) For additional requirements for cost reimbursement orders see
16.301-3.
(5) For additional requirements for time-and-materials or labor-
hour orders, see 16.601(e).
* * * * *
6. Amend section 16.601 by--
a. Removing from paragraph (c)(2)(i) ``(see 16.601(e)(1))'' and
adding ``(see 16.601(f)(1))'' in its place;
b. Revising paragraph (d) introductory text and paragraph (d)(2);
c. Redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph (f); and
d. Adding a new paragraph (e),
The revisions and addition read as follows.
16.601 Time-and-materials contracts.
* * * * *
(d) Limitations. A time-and-materials contract or order may be used
only if--
* * * * *
(2) The contract or order includes a ceiling price that the
contractor exceeds at its own risk. Also see 12.207(b) for further
limitations on use of time-and-materials or labor-hour contracts for
acquisition of commercial items.
(e) Post award requirements. Prior to an increase in the ceiling
price of a time-and-materials or labor-hour contract or order, the
contracting officer shall--
(1) Conduct an analysis of pricing and other relevant factors to
determine if the action is in the best interest of the Government;
(2) Document the decision in the contract or order file; and
(3) When making a change that modifies the general scope of--
(i) A contract, follow the procedures at 6.303;
(ii) An order issued under the Federal Supply Schedules, follow the
procedures at 8.405-6; or
(iii) An order issued under multiple award task and delivery order
contracts, follow the procedures at 16.505(b)(2).
* * * * *
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
52.216-29 [Amended]
7. Amend section 52.216-29 by removing from the introductory
paragraph ``16.601(e)(1)'' and adding ``16.601(f)(1)'' in its place.
52.216-30 [Amended]
8. Amend section 52.216-30 by removing from the introductory
paragraph ``16.601(e)(2)'' and adding ``16.601(f)(2)'' in its place.
52.216-31 [Amended]
9. Amend section 52.216-31 by removing from the introductory
paragraph ``16.601(e)(3)'' and adding ``16.601(f)(3)'' in its place.
[FR Doc. 2012-18276 Filed 7-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
