Federal Acquisition Regulations; DARPA-New Mexico Tax Agreement, 44063-44064 [2012-17732]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The change may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is
summarized as follows:
The objective of this rule is to implement
section 825 of the NDAA for FY 2011, which
extended the sunset date for Title 10 agencies
and section 813 of the NDAA for FY 2012,
which extended the sunset date for Title 41
agencies.
The authority to file protests against the
award of task or delivery orders is relatively
new, and there is little data available, as such
protests may be filed with the agency or
Government Accountability Office (GAO).
GAO has exclusive jurisdiction of a protest
of an order valued in excess of $10 million.
Data on agency-level protests is not compiled
outside the agency concerned; therefore
estimates are based on the total number of
protests filed at the GAO in FYs 2009, 2010
and 2011. The data was extracted from
GAO’s report to the Congress for those fiscal
years.
Offerors can protest to the agency or to the
GAO. Assuming that one-half of all protests
are filed with the GAO and the other half are
filed with the agency, then the average
number of protests filed per fiscal year would
be 6,700 (see below):
Fiscal Year 2009 protests to
GAO ..........................................
2,000
Fiscal Year 2010 protests to
GAO ..........................................
2,300
Fiscal Year 2011 protests to
GAO ..........................................
2,400
Divided by
Average annual GAO protests
Multiplied by
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES3
Estimated total number of
protests ..............................
18:38 Jul 25, 2012
Jkt 226001
17
The number 17 represents the number of
small business task or delivery order protests
sustained in a fiscal year. This number is
representative of protests against awards by
all Government agencies.
There is no requirement for small entities
to submit any information under this
provision. Therefore, no professional skills
are necessary on the part of small entities for
compliance, and the cost to small entities
associated with this provision is $0.
The Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting a copy of the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration. A copy
of the IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat. DoD, GSA, and
NASA invite comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by this rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested
parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610
(FAC 2005–60, FAR Case 2012–007) in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The interim rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
6,700 Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3 chapter 35).
2,233
2
4,467
Protests may be filed against the award of
contracts as well as certain task or delivery
orders. There are few prohibitions on the
grounds for protests against the award of a
contract. However, protests against the award
of a task or delivery order are limited to (a)
a protest on the grounds that the order
increases the scope, period, or maximum
value of the contract; or (b) a protest of an
order valued in excess of $10 million.
Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that less
than 50 percent of the total number of
protests filed is against the award of a task
or delivery order. A generous estimate is
approximately one-fourth, or 1,117. Likewise,
only a percentage of the protests against the
award of a task or delivery order are made
by small businesses. Even if we assume that
percentage to be one-half, then the number of
protests filed by small businesses against the
award of a task or delivery order is estimated
to be 559.
# protests of task/delivery orders
by small businesses .................
559
% of protests sustained ...............
× .03
VerDate Mar<15>2010
# of task/delivery orders protests
sustained ..................................
VI. Determination to Issue an Interim
Rule
A determination has been made under
the authority of the Secretary of Defense
(DoD), the Administrator of General
Services (GSA), and the Administrator
of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) that urgent and
compelling reasons exist to promulgate
this interim rule without prior
opportunity for public comment. This
action is necessary because statutory
authority for Title 41 offerors to file
certain bid protests lapsed May 27,
2011, but was reinstated in the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2012, effective December 31, 2011.
Similar authority for Title 10 offerors
was extended by a January 7, 2011,
statute, and has already been
implemented in the FAR. If this rule is
not published on an interim basis,
offerors could be misinformed about
their legal right to file certain protests.
Disappointed Title 41 offerors would be
unclear on whether to file bid protests
of civilian agency task and delivery
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
44063
order awards at either the GAO or the
Court of Federal Claims. This interim
rule clarifies that GAO has exclusive
jurisdiction of a protest of an order
valued in excess of $10 million.
However, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1707
and FAR 1.501–3(b), DoD, GSA, and
NASA will consider public comments
received in response to this interim rule
in the formation of the final rule.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 16
Government procurement.
Dated: July 16, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
amend 48 CFR part 16 as follows:
PART 16—TYPES OF CONTRACT
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 16 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
2. Amend section 16.505 by removing
from paragraph (a)(10)(i) introductory
text ‘‘under Subpart 33.1’’ and adding
‘‘under subpart 33.1’’ in its place; and
revising paragraph (a)(10)(ii) to read as
follows:
■
16.505
Ordering.
(a) * * *
(10) * * *
(ii) The authority to protest the
placement of an order under (a)(10)(i)(B)
of this section expires on September 30,
2016 (10 U.S.C. 2304a(d), 10 U.S.C.
2304c(e), 41 U.S.C. 4103(d), and 41
U.S.C. 4106(f)).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–17730 Filed 7–25–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 29
[FAC 2005–60; FAR Case 2012–019;
Item IV; Docket 2012–0019; Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM29
Federal Acquisition Regulations;
DARPA-New Mexico Tax Agreement
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
AGENCIES:
E:\FR\FM\26JYR3.SGM
26JYR3
44064
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Final rule.
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
add the United States Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA) to the list of agencies that have
entered into separate tax agreements
with the State of New Mexico (NM). The
DARPA–NM tax agreement eliminates
the double taxation of Government costreimbursement contracts when DARPA
contractors and their subcontractors
purchase tangible personal property to
be used in performing services in whole
or in part in the State of New Mexico,
and for which title to such property will
pass to the United States upon delivery
of the property to the contractor and its
subcontractors by the vendor.
DATES: Effective date: August 27, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Edward N. Chambers, Procurement
Analyst, at 202–501–3221 for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite
FAC 2005–60, FAR Case 2012–019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
On August 18, 2011, DARPA and the
Taxation and Revenue Department of
the State of New Mexico entered into
the DARPA–NM tax agreement to
eliminate the double taxation of
Government cost-reimbursement
contracts when DARPA contractors and
their subcontractors purchase tangible
personal property to be used in
performing services in whole or in part
in the State of New Mexico and for
which title to such property will pass to
the United States upon delivery of the
property to the contractor and its
subcontractors by the vendor.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES3
II. Discussion
The FAR is amended to add the
United States Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency to the list of
participating agencies under FAR
29.401–4(c). DARPA joins the list of
other agencies with existing tax
agreements with the State of New
Mexico.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:38 Jul 25, 2012
Jkt 226001
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Publication of This Final Rule for
Public Comment Is Not Required by
Statute
‘‘Publication of proposed
regulations’’, 41 U.S.C. 1707, is the
statute which applies to the publication
of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
Paragraph (a)(1) of the statute requires
that a procurement policy, regulation,
procedure or form (including an
amendment or modification thereof)
must be published for public comment
if it relates to the expenditure of
appropriated funds, and has either a
significant effect beyond the internal
operating procedures of the agency
issuing the policy, regulation, procedure
or form, or has a significant cost or
administrative impact on contractors or
offerors. This final rule is not required
to be published for public comment,
because it recognizes actions taken by
DARPA that do not have a significant
effect on contractors or offerors.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does
not apply to this rule because this final
rule does not constitute a significant
FAR revision, and 41 U.S.C. 1707 does
not require publication for public
comment.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 29
Government procurement.
Dated: July 16, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
amend 48 CFR part 29 as follows:
PART 29—TAXES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 29 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
29.401–4
[Amended]
2. Amend section 29.401–4 in
paragraph (c)(1) by adding to the listing,
in alphabetical order, ‘‘United States
Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency;’’.
■
[FR Doc. 2012–17732 Filed 7–25–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 53
[FAC 2005–60; FAR Case 2011–022;
Item V; Docket 2011–0093, Sequence IV]
RIN 9000–AM15
Federal Acquisition Regulation:
Clarification of Standards for
Computer Generation of Forms
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCIES:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
remove any reference to Federal
Information Processing Standard (FIPS)
161 and codify requirements for
standards already in use.
DATES: Effective Date: August 27, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Lague, Procurement Analyst, at
202–694–8149 for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat at 202–501–
4755. Please cite FAC 2005–60, FAR
Case 2011–022.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register at
76 FR 79609 on December 22, 2011, to
implement the removal of FIPS 161.
FIPS 161 is being removed based on the
notice posted in the Federal Register at
73 FR 51276 on September 2, 2008, by
the Department of Commerce. This FIPS
requirement was withdrawn by the
Secretary of Commerce because it was
obsolete and had not been updated to
adopt current voluntary industry
standards, Federal specifications,
Federal data standards, or current good
practices for information security. The
withdrawal of this standard created a
E:\FR\FM\26JYR3.SGM
26JYR3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 144 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44063-44064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17732]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 29
[FAC 2005-60; FAR Case 2012-019; Item IV; Docket 2012-0019; Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AM29
Federal Acquisition Regulations; DARPA-New Mexico Tax Agreement
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
[[Page 44064]]
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to add the United States Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to the list of agencies that
have entered into separate tax agreements with the State of New Mexico
(NM). The DARPA-NM tax agreement eliminates the double taxation of
Government cost-reimbursement contracts when DARPA contractors and
their subcontractors purchase tangible personal property to be used in
performing services in whole or in part in the State of New Mexico, and
for which title to such property will pass to the United States upon
delivery of the property to the contractor and its subcontractors by
the vendor.
DATES: Effective date: August 27, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Edward N. Chambers, Procurement
Analyst, at 202-501-3221 for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-60, FAR Case 2012-
019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On August 18, 2011, DARPA and the Taxation and Revenue Department
of the State of New Mexico entered into the DARPA-NM tax agreement to
eliminate the double taxation of Government cost-reimbursement
contracts when DARPA contractors and their subcontractors purchase
tangible personal property to be used in performing services in whole
or in part in the State of New Mexico and for which title to such
property will pass to the United States upon delivery of the property
to the contractor and its subcontractors by the vendor.
II. Discussion
The FAR is amended to add the United States Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency to the list of participating agencies under
FAR 29.401-4(c). DARPA joins the list of other agencies with existing
tax agreements with the State of New Mexico.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Publication of This Final Rule for Public Comment Is Not Required
by Statute
``Publication of proposed regulations'', 41 U.S.C. 1707, is the
statute which applies to the publication of the Federal Acquisition
Regulation. Paragraph (a)(1) of the statute requires that a procurement
policy, regulation, procedure or form (including an amendment or
modification thereof) must be published for public comment if it
relates to the expenditure of appropriated funds, and has either a
significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the
agency issuing the policy, regulation, procedure or form, or has a
significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors.
This final rule is not required to be published for public comment,
because it recognizes actions taken by DARPA that do not have a
significant effect on contractors or offerors.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule because
this final rule does not constitute a significant FAR revision, and 41
U.S.C. 1707 does not require publication for public comment.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 29
Government procurement.
Dated: July 16, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR part 29 as follows:
PART 29--TAXES
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 29 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
29.401-4 [Amended]
0
2. Amend section 29.401-4 in paragraph (c)(1) by adding to the listing,
in alphabetical order, ``United States Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency;''.
[FR Doc. 2012-17732 Filed 7-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P