Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes, 43545-43547 [2012-18145]
Download as PDF
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
in parts 30, 31, 32, 40 and 70 of Title
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) to make requirements for
distributors of byproduct material
clearer, less prescriptive, and more riskinformed and up to date. In that notice,
the NRC also proposed to redefine
categories of devices to be used under
exemptions, add explicit provisions
regarding the sealed source and device
registration process, and add flexibility
to the licensing of users of sealed
sources and devices. The public
comment period on the proposed rule
closed on September 7, 2010. The NRC
received 10 comments on the proposed
rule.
The NRC considered these comments
in developing a final rule [RIN 3150–
AH91; Docket ID NRC–2008–0338],
which is being published in the Rules
and Regulations Section of this issue of
the Federal Register. The final rule will
affect manufacturers and distributors of
certain products and materials
containing source material and certain
persons using source material under
general license and under exemptions
from licensing.
In conjunction with the final rule, the
NRC has developed interim guidance.
The interim guidance document
provides guidance to a licensee or
applicant for implementation of 10 CFR
parts 30, 31, 32, 40 and 70,
‘‘Requirements for Distribution of
Byproduct Material.’’ It is intended for
use by applicants, licensees, Agreement
States, and the NRC staff. The interim
guidance describes methods acceptable
to the NRC staff for implementing the
revised regulations. The approaches and
methods described in the guidance
document are provided for information
and use in implementing the revised
regulations. Methods and solutions
different from those described in the
interim guidance are acceptable if they
meet the requirements in 10 CFR parts
30, 31, 32, 40, and 70.
At this time, the NRC is announcing
the availability for use of ‘‘Interim
Guidance for Implementation of the
Final Rule, Requirements for
Distribution of Byproduct Material in 10
CFR Parts 30, 31, 32, 40, and 70.’’ The
document provides guidance on
implementing the revised provisions of
10 CFR parts 30, 31, 32, 40, and 70. The
NRC is also requesting public comment
on this interim guidance. Guidance on
the revised regulations will be included
in the next revision of the relevant
volumes in NUREG–1556,
‘‘Consolidated Guidance about Materials
Licenses.’’ Comments received on this
interim guidance will be considered in
the updating of those volumes of
NUREG–1556.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Jul 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day
of June 2012.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark A. Satorius,
Director, Office of Federal and State Materials
and Environmental Management Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012–17710 Filed 7–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0724; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–043–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to certain Bombardier, Inc.
Model DHC–8–400 series airplanes. The
existing AD currently requires a
modification to trim the edge of the
bumper plate, including performing an
inspection for damage or cracks of the
bumper plate and base fitting, and
replacing any damaged or cracked part.
That AD also currently requires, for
certain airplanes, reidentifying the
bumper plate. Since we issued that AD,
we have determined that an operational
check must be done after reidentifying
the bumper plate to ensure the
identified unsafe condition is
addressed. This proposed AD would
require, for airplanes on which the
reidentification is done, an operational
check of the alternate extension system
of the main landing gear (MLG), and
repair if necessary. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct failure of
the MLG to extend and lock, which
could adversely affect the safe landing
of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 10,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43545
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Bombardier,
Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123
Garratt Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario
M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416–375–
4000; fax 416–375–4539; email
thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com;
Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–
7318; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2012–0724; Directorate Identifier
2012–NM–043–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
43546
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Costs of Compliance
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On July 29, 2011, we issued AD 2011–
17–04, Amendment 39–16768 (76 FR
50403, August 15, 2011). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on certain Bombardier,
Inc. Model DHC–8–400, –401, and –402
airplanes.
Since we issued AD 2011–17–04,
Amendment 39–16768 (76 FR 50403,
August 15, 2011), we have determined
that an operational check must be done
after reidentifying the bumper plate to
ensure the identified unsafe condition is
addressed. This action is also included
in Canadian Airworthiness Directive
CF–2010–23, dated July 21, 2010
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’).
The MCAI states:
One in-service incident has been reported
on [a] DHC–8 Series 400 aeroplane in which
the right hand main landing gear (MLG)
failed to extend using the alternate gear
extension system. Investigation determined
that the tread on the outboard tire was
catching on the bumper plate located on the
outboard MLG door that prevented the MLG
door to open following an extension attempt
via the alternate extension system. Failure of
[the] MLG to extend and lock could adversely
affect the safe landing of the aeroplane.
To prevent the potential jam condition
between the bumper plate and the MLG tires,
Bombardier Aerospace has developed a
modification to trim the edge of the bumper
plate to eliminate the possibility of
interference [Bombardier Modsum 4–
113645].
The Modsum includes performing a
detailed visual inspection for damage or
cracks of the bumper plate and base
fitting and replacing any damaged or
cracked part with a new part, if
necessary. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Jul 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 65 products of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD
2011–17–04, Amendment 39–16768 (76
FR 50403, August 15, 2011), and
retained in this proposed AD take about
8 work-hours per product, at an average
labor rate of $85 per work hour.
Required parts would cost about $479
per product. Where the service
information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we
have assumed that there will be no
charge for these costs. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, the cost of the currently
required actions is $1,159 per product.
We estimate that it would take about
1 work-hour per product to comply with
the new basic requirements of this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is
$85 per work-hour. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$5,525, or $85 per product.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide a cost
estimate for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2011–17–04, Amendment 39–16768 (76
FR 50403, August 15, 2011), and adding
the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2012–
0724; Directorate Identifier 2012–NM–
043–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by September
10, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2011–17–04,
Amendment 39–16768 (76 FR 50403, August
15, 2011).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model
DHC–8–400, -401, and -402 airplanes,
certificated in any category, having serial
numbers 4001 through 4247 inclusive.
(d) Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 32: Landing Gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by one in-service
incident reported on a DHC–8–400 airplane
in which the right hand main landing gear
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(MLG) failed to extend using the alternate
gear extension system. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct failure of the MLG
to extend and lock, which could adversely
affect the safe landing of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Retained Actions for All Airplanes
Within 2,000 flight hours after September
19, 2011 (the effective date of AD 2011–17–
04, Amendment 39–16768 (76 FR 50403,
August 15, 2011): Incorporate Bombardier
Modsum 4–113645, including performing a
detailed visual inspection for damage or
cracks of the bumper plate and base fitting
and replacing any damaged or cracked part,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–32–74, Revision A, dated May 17, 2010.
Do all applicable replacements before further
flight.
Note 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this
AD: Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–32–74,
Revision A, dated May 17, 2010, includes an
operational check of the alternate extension
system of the MLG. If the operational check
fails, guidance on doing corrective actions
can be found in the Bombardier Q400 Dash
8 Aircraft Maintenance Manual.
(h) Retained Actions for Airplanes Having
Certain Bumper Plates
For airplanes on which a bumper plate
having part number 85424082–101 or
85424082–103 is installed on which the
rework specified in Bombardier Repair
Drawing 8/4–54–553 has been done: Within
1,000 flight hours after September 19, 2011
(the effective date of AD 2011–17–04,
Amendment 39–16768 (76 FR 50403, August
15, 2011), reidentify the bumper plate, in
accordance with paragraph 3.B., step (8) of
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–32–74,
Revision A, dated May 17, 2010.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Retained Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
modification required by paragraph (h) of
this AD by incorporation of Bombardier
Modsum 4–113645 before September 19,
2011 (the effective date of AD 2011–17–04,
Amendment 39–16768 (76 FR 50403, August
15, 2011), if the modification was performed
using Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–32–74,
dated December 23, 2009; and provided the
modification is done within the compliance
time specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(j) New Requirements of This AD:
Operational Check for Airplanes on Which
the Action Required by Paragraph (h) Is
Done
Concurrently with doing the actions
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, or
within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later: Perform an
operational check of the alternate extension
system of the MLG, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–32–74, Revision A, dated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Jul 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
May 17, 2010. If the operational check fails,
before further flight, repair in accordance
with a method approved by either the
Manager, New York Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA; or the Transport Canada
Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its delegated
agent).
Note 2 to paragraph (j) of this AD: If the
operational check fails, guidance on doing
the repair can be found in the Bombardier
Q400 Dash 8 Aircraft Maintenance Manual.
43547
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 17,
2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–18145 Filed 7–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD, provided the operational
check specified in paragraph (j) of this AD is
done within the compliance time specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD, or within 30 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, using Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84–32–74, dated December 23, 2009.
Federal Aviation Administration
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO,
ANE–170, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the New York ACO, send it to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York,
11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–
794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
AGENCY:
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2010–23, dated July 21, 2010;
and Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–32–74,
Revision A, dated May 17, 2010; for related
information.
(2) For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Bombardier, Inc.,
Q–Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5,
Canada; telephone 416–375–4000; fax 416–
375–4539; email
thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0723; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–137–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 737–600,
–700, –700C, –800, and –900 series
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a report of cracks found in
the skin at body station (STA) 540 just
below stringer S–22L on a Model 737–
700 series airplane. This proposed AD
would require repetitive detailed and
high frequency eddy current inspections
for cracking of the skin around the eight
fasteners common to the ends of the
STA 540 bulkhead chords between
stringers S–22 and S–23, left and right
sides; and corrective actions and
preventive modification if necessary.
We are proposing this AD to detect and
correct fatigue cracking in the skin,
which can result in rapid
decompression of the cabin.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 10,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43545-43547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18145]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0724; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-043-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to certain Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 series
airplanes. The existing AD currently requires a modification to trim
the edge of the bumper plate, including performing an inspection for
damage or cracks of the bumper plate and base fitting, and replacing
any damaged or cracked part. That AD also currently requires, for
certain airplanes, reidentifying the bumper plate. Since we issued that
AD, we have determined that an operational check must be done after
reidentifying the bumper plate to ensure the identified unsafe
condition is addressed. This proposed AD would require, for airplanes
on which the reidentification is done, an operational check of the
alternate extension system of the main landing gear (MLG), and repair
if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct failure of
the MLG to extend and lock, which could adversely affect the safe
landing of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 10,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416-375-4000; fax 416-375-
4539; email thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7318; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0724;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-043-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
[[Page 43546]]
substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On July 29, 2011, we issued AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76
FR 50403, August 15, 2011). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on certain Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-
400, -401, and -402 airplanes.
Since we issued AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR 50403,
August 15, 2011), we have determined that an operational check must be
done after reidentifying the bumper plate to ensure the identified
unsafe condition is addressed. This action is also included in Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-23, dated July 21, 2010 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''). The MCAI states:
One in-service incident has been reported on [a] DHC-8 Series
400 aeroplane in which the right hand main landing gear (MLG) failed
to extend using the alternate gear extension system. Investigation
determined that the tread on the outboard tire was catching on the
bumper plate located on the outboard MLG door that prevented the MLG
door to open following an extension attempt via the alternate
extension system. Failure of [the] MLG to extend and lock could
adversely affect the safe landing of the aeroplane.
To prevent the potential jam condition between the bumper plate
and the MLG tires, Bombardier Aerospace has developed a modification
to trim the edge of the bumper plate to eliminate the possibility of
interference [Bombardier Modsum 4-113645].
The Modsum includes performing a detailed visual inspection for damage
or cracks of the bumper plate and base fitting and replacing any
damaged or cracked part with a new part, if necessary. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 65 products of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768
(76 FR 50403, August 15, 2011), and retained in this proposed AD take
about 8 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per
work hour. Required parts would cost about $479 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, the cost of the currently required actions is $1,159 per
product.
We estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $5,525, or $85 per
product.
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive
(AD) 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR 50403, August 15, 2011), and
adding the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2012-0724; Directorate Identifier
2012-NM-043-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by September 10, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR
50403, August 15, 2011).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400, -401, and -
402 airplanes, certificated in any category, having serial numbers
4001 through 4247 inclusive.
(d) Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
Gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by one in-service incident reported on a
DHC-8-400 airplane in which the right hand main landing gear
[[Page 43547]]
(MLG) failed to extend using the alternate gear extension system. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct failure of the MLG to
extend and lock, which could adversely affect the safe landing of
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Retained Actions for All Airplanes
Within 2,000 flight hours after September 19, 2011 (the
effective date of AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR 50403,
August 15, 2011): Incorporate Bombardier Modsum 4-113645, including
performing a detailed visual inspection for damage or cracks of the
bumper plate and base fitting and replacing any damaged or cracked
part, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-74, Revision A, dated May 17,
2010. Do all applicable replacements before further flight.
Note 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD: Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84-32-74, Revision A, dated May 17, 2010, includes an
operational check of the alternate extension system of the MLG. If
the operational check fails, guidance on doing corrective actions
can be found in the Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Aircraft Maintenance
Manual.
(h) Retained Actions for Airplanes Having Certain Bumper Plates
For airplanes on which a bumper plate having part number
85424082-101 or 85424082-103 is installed on which the rework
specified in Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-54-553 has been done:
Within 1,000 flight hours after September 19, 2011 (the effective
date of AD 2011-17-04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR 50403, August 15,
2011), reidentify the bumper plate, in accordance with paragraph
3.B., step (8) of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-32-74, Revision A, dated May 17, 2010.
(i) Retained Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the modification required by
paragraph (h) of this AD by incorporation of Bombardier Modsum 4-
113645 before September 19, 2011 (the effective date of AD 2011-17-
04, Amendment 39-16768 (76 FR 50403, August 15, 2011), if the
modification was performed using Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-
74, dated December 23, 2009; and provided the modification is done
within the compliance time specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
(j) New Requirements of This AD: Operational Check for Airplanes on
Which the Action Required by Paragraph (h) Is Done
Concurrently with doing the actions required by paragraph (h) of
this AD, or within 30 days after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later: Perform an operational check of the
alternate extension system of the MLG, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-74,
Revision A, dated May 17, 2010. If the operational check fails,
before further flight, repair in accordance with a method approved
by either the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA; or the Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its delegated
agent).
Note 2 to paragraph (j) of this AD: If the operational check
fails, guidance on doing the repair can be found in the Bombardier
Q400 Dash 8 Aircraft Maintenance Manual.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD, provided the operational check specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD is done within the compliance time
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, or within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, using Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-32-74, dated December 23, 2009.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the New York ACO, send it to
ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York
ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York, 11590;
telephone 516-228-7300; fax 516-794-5531. Before using any approved
AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards
district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-23,
dated July 21, 2010; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-74,
Revision A, dated May 17, 2010; for related information.
(2) For service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416-375-4000;
fax 416-375-4539; email thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 17, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-18145 Filed 7-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P