Safety Zone; Gilmerton Bridge Center Span Float-in, Elizabeth River; Norfolk, Portsmouth, and Chesapeake, VA, 43557-43560 [2012-18125]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Hector Cintron,
Waterways Management Division Chief,
Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard;
telephone 757–668–5581, email
Hector.L.Cintron@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Coast Guard
Table of Acronyms
33 CFR Part 165
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
at no more than 15 knots, are subject to
control by the Coast Guard, and must
follow the instructions of designated
representatives.
(2) At least 48 hours prior to each
enforcement period, the Coast Guard
will provide notice of the regulated area
through advanced notice via Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners. The Coast Guard will also
provide notice of the regulated area by
on-scene designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced from 12:01 p.m. on
Saturday of the second week through
2 a.m. on Monday of the third week in
October (Columbus Day weekend) each
year.
Dated: June 20, 2012.
William D. Baumgartner,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012–18151 Filed 7–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0642]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Gilmerton Bridge Center
Span Float-in, Elizabeth River; Norfolk,
Portsmouth, and Chesapeake, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Elizabeth River
in Norfolk, Portsmouth, and
Chesapeake, VA. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the
Gilmerton Bridge Center Span Float-in
and bridge construction of span
placement. This action is intended to
restrict vessel traffic movement to
protect mariners from the hazards
associated with the float-in and span
placement.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 14, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–0642 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Jul 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2012–0642),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43557
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2012–0642 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2012–0642 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this rulemaking. You
may also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
43558
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
B. Basis and Purpose
On September 5, 2012 through
September 9, 2012 with inclement
weather dates of September 10, 2012
through September 14, 2012, PCL Civil
Construction, INC will facilitate removal
of the existing bascule spans from the
Gilmerton Bridge, transport of the new
center span from the Eastern Branch of
the Elizabeth River at the Campostella
Bridge to the Southern Branch at the
Gilmerton Bridge in Norfolk,
Portsmouth, and Chesapeake, VA and
the placement of the center span at the
Gilmerton Bridge in Chesapeake, VA.
Due to the need to protect mariners and
the public transiting the Elizabeth River
from hazards associated with the span
move and construction of span
placement, the Coast Guard proposes to
establish a moving safety zone and an
extended waterway closure at the
Glimerton Bridge. Access to this area
would be restricted for public safety
purposes.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
a temporary moving safety zone around
the Gilmerton Bridge Center Span barge,
restricting vessels operating in the
navigable waters on the Elizabeth River
from the Campostella Bridge located in
the Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth
River to the Gilmerton Bridge beginning.
This movement is scheduled to begin at
6 a.m. on September 5, 2012, weather
permitting. Because of the size of the
barge and the width of the waterway,
vessels will not be able to transit around
the Barge, necessitating closure of the
entire down river waterway to the
Glimerton Bridge. Transit is expected to
take approximately seven hours. This
action is necessary to ensure the safety
of PCL Construction and vessels
immediately prior to, during, and
following the transit of the span.
In addition to the moving safety zone,
we propose to establish safety zone at
the Gilmerton Bridge starting at 6 a.m.
on September 5, 2012, weather
permitting until work is completed on
the placement of the center span on the
Gilmerton Bridge, estimated closure of
the waterway to all vessel traffic at the
Gilmerton Bridge is until September 9,
2012, with inclement weather dates of
September 10, 2012 through September
14, 2012. During the removal of the
existing structures and installation of
the new bridge span there is a danger of
falling debris. Additionally, PCL
Construction will be using construction
equipment that will obstruct the
waterway immediately under and
adjacent to the Glimerton Bridge. This
safety zone is proposed in the interest
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Jul 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
of public safety during span placement
at the Gilmerton Bridge and will be
enforced from 6 a.m. on September 5,
2012, weather permitted, until
September 9, 2012, with inclement
weather dates of September 10, 2012
through September 14, 2012. Access to
the safety zone will be restricted during
the specified dates. Except for vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his Representative, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the safety zone.
Coast Guard Captain of the Port will
give notice of the enforcement of the
safety zone by all appropriate means to
provide the widest dissemination of
notice among the affected segments of
the public. This will include
publication in the Local Notice to
Mariners and Marine Information
Broadcasts. Marine information and
facsimile broadcasts may also be made
for these events, beginning 24 to 48
hours before the event.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. The primary impact of these
regulations will be on vessels wishing to
transit the affected waterways during
the moving safety zone accompanying
the Glimerton Bridge Span Barge and
the safety zone at the Gilmerton Bridge
beginning at 6 a.m. on September 5,
2012 through September 9, 2012, with
inclement weather dates of September
10, 2012 through September 14, 2012.
Although these regulations prevent
traffic from transiting a portion of the
Elizabeth River during these events, that
restriction is limited in duration, affects
only a limited area, and will be well
publicized to allow mariners to make
alternative plans for transiting the
affected area. This regulation is
designed to ensure such transit is
conducted in a safe and orderly fashion.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Impact Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed
rule would affect the following entities,
some of which might be small entities:
the owners or operators of vessels
intending to operate or anchor in
portions of the Elizabeth River, in
Virginia. The regulations would not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: the restrictions
are limited in duration, affect only
limited areas, and will be well
publicized to allow mariners to make
alternative plans for transiting the
affected areas.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LCDR Hector
Cintron, Waterways Management
Division Chief, Sector Hampton Roads,
Coast Guard; telephone 757–668–5581,
email Hector.L.Cintron@uscg.mil. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this proposed rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Jul 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
43559
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
12. Energy Effects
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a
safety zone. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0642 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T05–0642 Safety Zone; Gilmerton
Bridge Center Span Float-in, Elizabeth
River; Norfolk, Portsmouth, and
Chesapeake, Virginia.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone:
Regulated Area 1—All waters of the
Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth River
within 400 feet behind the Gilmerton
Bridge Center Span Barge extending to
the entrance of the Southern Branch of
the Elizabeth River and then continuing
down river in the Southern Branch of
Elizabeth River to the Gilmerton Bridge
in the vicinity of Norfolk, Portsmouth
and Chesapeake, VA. As the Gilmerton
Bridge Center Span Barge transits
through the waterway, the upriver
portions of the waterway will reopen.
Regulated Area 2—All waters of the
Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River
within 400 feet of Gilmerton Bridge in
the vicinity of Chesapeake, VA.
(b) Definition: For the purposes of this
part, Captain of the Port Representative
means any U.S. Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia to
act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in 165.23 of this
part, entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads can be reached through the Sector
Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads
in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone
number (757) 668–5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
43560
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 25, 2012 / Proposed Rules
radio channel 13 (165.65 Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This
regulation will be enforced starting at
6 a.m. on September 5, 2012 through
September 9, 2012, with inclement
weather dates of September 10, 2012
through September 14, 2012.
Dated: July 13, 2012.
John K. Little,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012–18125 Filed 7–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
If you prefer to send your comments
by email, use the following address:
august.martin@ed.gov. You must
include the term ‘‘Proposed Waivers
and Extensions for AIVRS’’ in the
subject line of your message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
August Martin. Telephone: (202) 245–
7410, or by email:
august.martin@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
American Indian Vocational
Rehabilitation Services Program;
Proposed Waivers and Extensions of
the Project Periods
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Proposed waivers and
extensions.
AGENCY:
CFDA Number: 84.250J.
For 60-month projects
initially funded in fiscal year (FY) 2007
under the American Indian Vocational
Rehabilitation Services (AIVRS)
Program, the Department proposes to
waive the regulations that generally
limit project periods to 60 months and
that restrict project period extensions
involving the obligation of additional
Federal funds. The Department also
proposes to extend the project period
until September 30, 2013, for the AIVRS
grantees whose awards are scheduled to
expire on September 30, 2012. The
proposed waivers and extensions would
enable the eight AIVRS grantees in the
FY 2007 funding cohort to request and
continue to receive Federal funding
beyond the 60-month limitation
contained in the Department’s
regulations, so long as the grantees are
meeting the AIVRS program and other
applicable requirements. Further, if the
proposed waivers and extensions are
made final, the Department would not
announce a new competition in FY 2012
or make new awards in FY 2012.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before August 24, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit all comments on
this notice to August Martin, United
States Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue SW., Room 5049,
Potomac Center Plaza (PCP),
Washington, DC 20202–7241.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Jul 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Invitation to Comment: We invite you
to submit comments regarding this
notice. We are particularly interested in
comments on the effect these proposed
waivers and extensions may have on the
AIVRS program and on potential
applicants for grant awards under any
new AIVRS notice inviting applications,
should there be one.
Eligible applicants for AIVRS are the
governing bodies of Indian tribes (and
consortia of those governing bodies)
located on Federal and State
reservations.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about these proposed waivers and
extensions for AIVRS in room 5105,
(PCP), 550 12th Street SW., Washington,
DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and
4:00 p.m., Washington, DC time,
Monday through Friday of each week,
except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this notice of proposed
waivers and extensions. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of
aid, please contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Background
The eight AIVRS grantees, selected
based on the 2007 AIVRS notice inviting
applications (2007 NIA) published on
March 14, 2007 (72 FR 11851), provide
vocational rehabilitation services to
American Indians with disabilities who
reside on or near Federal or State
reservations as authorized by section
121 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended (the Act) (29 U.S.C. 741).
The project period for the eight
AIVRS grantees is scheduled to end
September 30, 2012. Section 121(b)(3) of
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Act provides that the Department
has the authority to make an AIVRS
grant effective for more than 60 months,
pursuant to prescribed regulations. For
these projects, the Department proposes
to waive the requirements of 34 CFR
75.250 and 34 CFR 75.261(c)(2), which
limit project periods to 60 months and
restrict project period extensions that
involve the obligation of additional
Federal funds. The Department also
proposes to extend the project period for
the eight AIVRS grantees from October
1, 2012, through September 30, 2013.
The proposed waivers and extensions
would enable the eight AIVRS grantees
to request and continue to receive
Federal funds beyond the 60-month
limitation set by 34 CFR 75.250.
The Department makes this proposal,
consistent with the Department’s
commitment to excellence and
continuous improvement, because a
question was raised by the U.S.
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) in a report released on May 9,
2012, concerning the Department’s
practice for determining eligibility
under the AIVRS program. The report is
titled Federal Funding for NonFederally Recognized Tribes, GAO–12–
348, and can be found on the GAO Web
site at www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12348.
In the report, the GAO made a finding
in which it noted that the Department’s
interpretation of reservation used in
determining eligibility under the AIVRS
program raised substantial questions for
GAO about the eligibility of Staterecognized tribes that are not located on
State reservations, but rather are located
on a defined and contiguous area of
land where there is a concentration of
tribal members and in which the tribe
is providing structured activities and
services, such as the tribal service areas
identified in a tribe’s grant application.
The GAO recommended that the
Secretary review the Department’s
practices with respect to eligibility
requirements and take appropriate
action with respect to grants made to
tribes that do not have Federal or State
reservations.
In order to comply with the GAO’s
recommendation, we believe it is
advisable to maintain funding to
existing AIVRS projects during the time
period the Department is implementing
the GAO recommendation and not to
hold a new AIVRS competition in FY
2012. The Department has determined
that it is not advisable to announce a
new competition under which entities
would be expected to have the burden
of proceeding through the application
process while the Department reviews
E:\FR\FM\25JYP1.SGM
25JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43557-43560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18125]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0642]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Gilmerton Bridge Center Span Float-in, Elizabeth
River; Norfolk, Portsmouth, and Chesapeake, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Elizabeth River in Norfolk, Portsmouth, and
Chesapeake, VA. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of
life on navigable waters during the Gilmerton Bridge Center Span Float-
in and bridge construction of span placement. This action is intended
to restrict vessel traffic movement to protect mariners from the
hazards associated with the float-in and span placement.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 14, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0642 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Hector Cintron, Waterways Management Division
Chief, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone 757-668-5581, email
Hector.L.Cintron@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-0642), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2012-0642 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2012-0642 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to
use the Docket Management Facility.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
[[Page 43558]]
B. Basis and Purpose
On September 5, 2012 through September 9, 2012 with inclement
weather dates of September 10, 2012 through September 14, 2012, PCL
Civil Construction, INC will facilitate removal of the existing bascule
spans from the Gilmerton Bridge, transport of the new center span from
the Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth River at the Campostella Bridge to
the Southern Branch at the Gilmerton Bridge in Norfolk, Portsmouth, and
Chesapeake, VA and the placement of the center span at the Gilmerton
Bridge in Chesapeake, VA. Due to the need to protect mariners and the
public transiting the Elizabeth River from hazards associated with the
span move and construction of span placement, the Coast Guard proposes
to establish a moving safety zone and an extended waterway closure at
the Glimerton Bridge. Access to this area would be restricted for
public safety purposes.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary moving safety
zone around the Gilmerton Bridge Center Span barge, restricting vessels
operating in the navigable waters on the Elizabeth River from the
Campostella Bridge located in the Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth River
to the Gilmerton Bridge beginning. This movement is scheduled to begin
at 6 a.m. on September 5, 2012, weather permitting. Because of the size
of the barge and the width of the waterway, vessels will not be able to
transit around the Barge, necessitating closure of the entire down
river waterway to the Glimerton Bridge. Transit is expected to take
approximately seven hours. This action is necessary to ensure the
safety of PCL Construction and vessels immediately prior to, during,
and following the transit of the span.
In addition to the moving safety zone, we propose to establish
safety zone at the Gilmerton Bridge starting at 6 a.m. on September 5,
2012, weather permitting until work is completed on the placement of
the center span on the Gilmerton Bridge, estimated closure of the
waterway to all vessel traffic at the Gilmerton Bridge is until
September 9, 2012, with inclement weather dates of September 10, 2012
through September 14, 2012. During the removal of the existing
structures and installation of the new bridge span there is a danger of
falling debris. Additionally, PCL Construction will be using
construction equipment that will obstruct the waterway immediately
under and adjacent to the Glimerton Bridge. This safety zone is
proposed in the interest of public safety during span placement at the
Gilmerton Bridge and will be enforced from 6 a.m. on September 5, 2012,
weather permitted, until September 9, 2012, with inclement weather
dates of September 10, 2012 through September 14, 2012. Access to the
safety zone will be restricted during the specified dates. Except for
vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port or his Representative, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in the safety zone. Coast Guard
Captain of the Port will give notice of the enforcement of the safety
zone by all appropriate means to provide the widest dissemination of
notice among the affected segments of the public. This will include
publication in the Local Notice to Mariners and Marine Information
Broadcasts. Marine information and facsimile broadcasts may also be
made for these events, beginning 24 to 48 hours before the event.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The primary impact of
these regulations will be on vessels wishing to transit the affected
waterways during the moving safety zone accompanying the Glimerton
Bridge Span Barge and the safety zone at the Gilmerton Bridge beginning
at 6 a.m. on September 5, 2012 through September 9, 2012, with
inclement weather dates of September 10, 2012 through September 14,
2012. Although these regulations prevent traffic from transiting a
portion of the Elizabeth River during these events, that restriction is
limited in duration, affects only a limited area, and will be well
publicized to allow mariners to make alternative plans for transiting
the affected area. This regulation is designed to ensure such transit
is conducted in a safe and orderly fashion.
2. Impact Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following entities,
some of which might be small entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to operate or anchor in portions of the Elizabeth
River, in Virginia. The regulations would not have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons:
the restrictions are limited in duration, affect only limited areas,
and will be well publicized to allow mariners to make alternative plans
for transiting the affected areas.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LCDR Hector Cintron, Waterways
Management Division Chief, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone
757-668-5581, email Hector.L.Cintron@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed
[[Page 43559]]
this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a safety zone. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination
are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0642 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0642 Safety Zone; Gilmerton Bridge Center Span Float-in,
Elizabeth River; Norfolk, Portsmouth, and Chesapeake, Virginia.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone:
Regulated Area 1--All waters of the Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth
River within 400 feet behind the Gilmerton Bridge Center Span Barge
extending to the entrance of the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River
and then continuing down river in the Southern Branch of Elizabeth
River to the Gilmerton Bridge in the vicinity of Norfolk, Portsmouth
and Chesapeake, VA. As the Gilmerton Bridge Center Span Barge transits
through the waterway, the upriver portions of the waterway will reopen.
Regulated Area 2--All waters of the Southern Branch of the
Elizabeth River within 400 feet of Gilmerton Bridge in the vicinity of
Chesapeake, VA.
(b) Definition: For the purposes of this part, Captain of the Port
Representative means any U.S. Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Hampton Roads, Virginia to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on shore or on board a vessel
that is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on shore or on board a vessel that is displaying a U.S. Coast
Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads can be reached through
the Sector Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads in Portsmouth, Virginia
at telephone number (757) 668-5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives enforcing the safety zone can
be contacted on VHF-FM marine band
[[Page 43560]]
radio channel 13 (165.65 Mhz) and channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This regulation will be enforced starting
at 6 a.m. on September 5, 2012 through September 9, 2012, with
inclement weather dates of September 10, 2012 through September 14,
2012.
Dated: July 13, 2012.
John K. Little,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012-18125 Filed 7-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P