Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment Under the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 43414-43416 [2012-18043]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
43414
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2012 / Notices
Dated: July 18, 2012.
Thomas M. Countryman,
Assistant Secretary of State for International
Security and Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2012–18041 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7962]
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs;
Statutory Debarment Under the Arms
Export Control Act and the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations
ACTION:
Notice.
Notice is hereby given that
the Department of State has imposed
statutory debarment pursuant to
§ 127.7(c) of the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (‘‘ITAR’’) (22 CFR
Parts 120 to 130) on persons convicted
of violating, or conspiracy to violate,
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control
Act, as amended (‘‘AECA’’) (22 U.S.C.
2778). Further, a public notice was
published in the Federal Register on
Tuesday, November 15, 2011, listing
persons statutorily debarred pursuant to
the ITAR; this notice makes one
correction to that notice.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date
is the date of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Aguirre, Director, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of
Political-Military Affairs, Department of
State (202) 632–2798.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C.
2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of
State from issuing licenses or other
approvals for the export of defense
articles or defense services where the
applicant, or any party to the export, has
been convicted of violating certain
statutes, including the AECA. The
statute permits limited exceptions to be
made on a case-by-case basis. In
implementing this provision, Section
127.7 of the ITAR provides for
‘‘statutory debarment’’ of any person
who has been convicted of violating or
conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons
subject to statutory debarment are
prohibited from participating directly or
indirectly in the export of defense
articles, including technical data, or in
the furnishing of defense services for
which a license or other approval is
required.
Statutory debarment is based solely
upon conviction in a criminal
proceeding, conducted by a United
States Court, and as such the
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:06 Jul 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
administrative debarment procedures
outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR are not
applicable.
The period for debarment will be
determined by the Assistant Secretary
for Political-Military Affairs based on
the underlying nature of the violations,
but will generally be for three years
from the date of conviction. Export
privileges may be reinstated only at the
request of the debarred person followed
by the necessary interagency
consultations, after a thorough review of
the circumstances surrounding the
conviction, and a finding that
appropriate steps have been taken to
mitigate any law enforcement concerns,
as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the
AECA. Unless export privileges are
reinstated, however, the person remains
debarred.
Department of State policy permits
debarred persons to apply to the
Director, Office of Defense Trade
Controls Compliance, for reinstatement
beginning one year after the date of the
debarment. Any decision to grant
reinstatement can be made only after the
statutory requirements of Section
38(g)(4) of the AECA have been
satisfied.
Exceptions, also known as transaction
exceptions, may be made to this
debarment determination on a case-bycase basis at the discretion of the
Assistant Secretary of State for PoliticalMilitary Affairs, after consulting with
the appropriate U.S. agencies. However,
such an exception would be granted
only after a full review of all
circumstances, paying particular
attention to the following factors:
whether an exception is warranted by
overriding U.S. foreign policy or
national security interests; whether an
exception would further law
enforcement concerns that are
consistent with the foreign policy or
national security interests of the United
States; or whether other compelling
circumstances exist that are consistent
with the foreign policy or national
security interests of the United States,
and that do not conflict with law
enforcement concerns. Even if
exceptions are granted, the debarment
continues until subsequent
reinstatement.
Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the
AECA and Section 127.7(c) of the ITAR,
the following persons are statutorily
debarred as of the date of this notice
(Name; Date of Conviction; District;
Case No.; Month/Year of Birth):
(1) Miguel Avendano-Reyna; April 30,
2012; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:11CR00999–S1–001; April, 1976.
PO 00000
Frm 00187
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(2) Davoud Baniameri (aka Davoud
Baniamery, David Baniameri, David
Baniamery); August 12, 2011; U.S.
District Court, Northern District of
Illinois; Case No. 09–CR–736–1;
August, 1972.
(3) Donald V. Bernardo; November 16,
2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Florida; Case No. 1:10–
60331–CR–SEITZ–1; November,
1938.
(4) Jorge Blanco-Castillo; September 20,
2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
1:11CR00178–001; November, 1969.
(5) Igor Bobel; May 11, 2012; U.S.
District Court, Eastern District of
Pennsylvania; Case No. 11–CR–
00749–HB–1; February, 1968.
(6) Oscar Edwardo Cantu; March 21,
2012; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:11CR00686–S1–001; March, 1980.
(7) Henson Chua; November 8, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Middle District
of Florida; Case No. 8:11–CR–137–
T–30AEP; January, 1964.
(8) Kue Sang Chun; November 15, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Northern
District of Ohio; Case No.
1:11CR00009–001; October, 1943.
(9) Luz Sylvia Cortez; November 28,
2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:10CR00061–002; April, 1976.
(10) Dan Tran Dang; April 16, 2012; U.S.
District Court, Central District of
California; Case No. SACR 08–
00322–CJC; December, 1954.
(11) Santos Isidro de la Paz; May 11,
2012; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:11CR00396–007; September,
1988.
(12) Anna Fermanova; October 26, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Eastern District
of New York; Case No. CR11–
00008(CBA); July, 1986.
(13) Galaxy Aviation Services; June 30,
2011; U.S. District Court, Middle
District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10–
CR–00058–004–MTT; N/A.
(14) Ruslan Gilchenko; February 4,
2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Arizona; Case No. CR10–00233–
001–PHX–FJM; October, 1976.
(15) Juan Victorian Gimenez; March 21,
2012; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Florida; Case No. 1:11–
20669–CR–MARTINEZ–1; October,
1983.
(16) Enrique Gustavo Gonzalez; April
28, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No.
7:10CR01032–001; September,
1990.
(17) Issac Obed Gonzalez; July 11, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Southern
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2012 / Notices
District of Texas; Case No.
7:10CR01171–001; October, 1989.
(18) Steven Neal Greenoe; January 10,
2012; U.S. District Court, Eastern
District of North Carolina; Case No.
5:10–CR–277–1H; November, 1973.
(19) Stephen Glen Guerra; February 6,
2012; U.S. District Court, Western
District of Texas; Case No. W–11–
CR–200(04); February, 1979.
(20) Oscar Hernandez-Bravo (aka Oscar
Bravo Hernandez); April 4, 2012;
U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:09CR00809–S1–001; February,
1971.
(21) Chou-Fu Ho; September 20, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Southern
District of California; Case No.
10CR2415 BTM; September, 1971.
(22) Rene Huerta, Jr.; August 16, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
1:10CR01396–001; October, 1972.
(23) Liem Duc Huynh (aka Duc Huynh);
April 17, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Central District of California; Case
No. SACR 08–00322–CJC;
September, 1959.
(24) Octavio Ibarra-Sanchez; February
22, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No.
7:11CR01518–001; March, 1984.
(25) Phillip Andro Jamison; November
8, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of California; Case
No. 10CR3618–H; February, 1980.
(26) Young Su Kim; August 19, 2011;
U.S. District Court, District of
Colorado; Case No. 11–cr–00171–
LTB–01; August, 1953.
(27) Marc Knapp; September 13, 2011;
U.S. District Court, District of
Delaware; Case No. 10CR108–LPS;
December, 1974.
(28) Connor H. Kraegel; August 24,
2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Maryland; Case No. AW–8–11–CR–
0273–001; October, 1990.
(29) Li Li (aka Lea Li); October 3, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Eastern District
of Virginia; Case No. 1:10CR00207–
002; April, 1978.
(30) Mario Julian Martinez-Bernache;
March 15, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No.
1:11CR00759–001; August, 1989.
(31) Scott Michael Miller; December 1,
2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of New York; Case No. 06
Crim. 0566 (DC); August, 1958.
(32) Placido Molina, Jr.; March 2, 2012;
U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
1:11CR00530–001; September,
1984.
(33) Balraj Naidu; December 20, 2010;
U.S. District Court, District of
Maryland; Case No. CCB–1–08–CR–
00091–002; February, 1967.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:06 Jul 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
(34) Jamal Nehme; May 26, 2011; U.S.
District Court, District of Delaware;
Case No. 09–CR–74–01 GMS; April,
1963.
(35) Joseph Oldani; June 3, 2009; U.S.
District Court, Southern District of
West Virginia; Case No. 3:08–00287;
August, 1987.
(36) Timothy Oldani; June 3, 2009; U.S.
District Court, Southern District of
West Virginia; Case No. 3:09–00010;
November, 1984.
(37) John Dennis Tan Ong (aka Dennis
Ong, John Tan Ong); December 19,
2011; U.S. District Court, Northern
District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10–
cr–352–JEC–01; November, 1973.
(38) Juan Narcizo Oyervides-Campos;
November 21, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas;
Case No. 7:11CR00338–001; July,
1990.
(39) Manuel Mario Pavon; January 13,
2012; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:11CR01434–S–001; June, 1991.
(40) Jerome Stuart Pendzich; October 12,
2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern
District of Tennessee; Case No.
3:10–CR–168–001; March, 1977.
(41) Lee Roy Perez; December 13, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:11CR00389–001; July, 1987.
(42) Julio Alejandro Quirino; August 31,
2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:10CR01171–002; November, 1984.
(43) Ramadan Rama; July 21, 2011; U.S.
District Court, Eastern District of
North Carolina; Case No. 5:10–CR–
397–1D; December, 1970.
(44) Martin Ramirez-Rodriguez (aka
Julian Garcia-Penaloza, Alberto
Moreno-Garza, Machin AguilarGaona); November 9, 2010; U.S.
District Court, Northern District of
Florida; Case No. 5:10CR39–002–
RS; October, 1983.
(45) Jose Arturo Ramon-Herrada;
February 24, 2012; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas;
Case No. 7:11CR00853–002;
February, 1983.
(46) Felix Reyes; July 28, 2011; U.S.
District Court, Southern District of
Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01500–001;
March, 1992.
(47) Jose Guadalupe Reyes-Martinez;
November 21, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas;
Case No. 7:11CR00396–010;
September, 1982.
(48) Adrian Jesus Reyna; January 27,
2012; U.S. District Court, Western
District of Texas; Case No. W–11–
CR–200(01); July, 1986.
(49) Gerardo Domingo Rodriguez-Rivera;
January 13, 2012; U.S. District
PO 00000
Frm 00188
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43415
Court, Southern District of Texas;
Case No. 7:11CR01434–S–002; June,
1993.
(50) Nestor Omar Sauceda-Trevino;
July 18, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No.
1:11CR00240–001; May, 1990.
(51) Hamid Seifi, (aka Hank Seifi);
July 5, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle
District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10–CR–
00058–003–MTT; March, 1963.
(52) Chan Hok Shek, (aka John Chan);
September 27, 2011; U.S. District Court,
District of Massachusetts; Case No.
1:08–CR–10317–001–DPW; December,
1953.
(53) Andrew Silcox; March 1, 2012;
U.S. District Court, Western District of
Texas; Case No. SA–11–CR–883(1)FB;
March, 1958.
(54) Oscar Sorroza-Garcia; July 5,
2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of California; Case No.
09CR3600–BEN; October, 1973.
(55) Staff Gasket Manufacturing Corp.;
September 15, 2011; U.S. District Court,
District of New Jersey; Case No. 2:CR11–
0256–01; N/A.
(56) Swiss Technology, Inc.;
November 15, 2011; U.S. District Court,
District of New Jersey; Case No. 2:11–
CR–473–JLL–01; N/A.
(57) Leonardo Talamantez; April 23,
2012; U.S. District Court, Western
District of Texas; Case No. DR–11–CR–
1354(2)–AM; July, 1986.
(58) The Parts Guys, LLC; November
3, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle
District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10–CR–
00058–002–MTT; N/A.
(59) Michael Edward Todd; November
8, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle
District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10–CR–
00058–001–MTT; June, 1980.
(60) Alfonso Torres; May 12, 2012;
U.S. District Court, Southern District of
Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00687–001;
October, 1970.
(61) Hong Wei Xian, (aka Harry Zan);
October 3, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Eastern District of Virginia; Case No.
1:10CR00207–001; December, 1978.
(62) Lian Yang; October 27, 2011; U.S.
District Court, Western District of
Washington; Case No.
2:11CR00094TSZ–001; February, 1964.
(63) Nguessan Yao; December 15,
2011; U.S. District Court, Northern
District of California; Case No. CR–10–
00434–002; January, 1955.
(64) Edgar Daniel Zapata; April 30,
2012; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:11CR00396–001; August, 1980.
As noted above, at the end of the
three-year period following the date of
this notice, the above named persons/
entities remain debarred unless export
privileges are reinstated.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
43416
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 24, 2012 / Notices
Debarred persons are generally
ineligible to participate in activity
regulated under the ITAR (see e.g.,
sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)).
Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the
ITAR, any person who has knowledge
that another person is subject to
debarment or is otherwise ineligible
may not, without disclosure to and
written approval from the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls, participate,
directly or indirectly, in any export in
which such ineligible person may
benefit there from or have a direct or
indirect interest therein.
Further, Federal Register document
2011–29470, published at 76 FR 70805,
Tuesday, November 15, 2011, is
corrected on page 70807, line 12
through line 15 to read as follows:
1. Andrew V. ODonnell; August 1,
2011; U.S. District Court, Northern
District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10–CR–
491–CAP; July, 1977.
That notice of statutory debarment
incorrectly identified the debarred party
as ‘‘Andrew V. O’Donnell’’ and the
Month/Year of birth of the debarred
party as ‘‘July, 1997.’’
This notice is provided for purposes
of making the public aware that the
persons listed above are prohibited from
participating directly or indirectly in
activities regulated by the ITAR,
including any brokering activities and
in any export from or temporary import
into the United States of defense
articles, related technical data, or
defense services in all situations
covered by the ITAR. Specific case
information may be obtained from the
Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District
Courts mentioned above and by citing
the court case number where provided.
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting will be
opened to the public from 1:00 p.m. to
4:00 p.m.
DATES: The meeting is scheduled for
August 10, 2012, unless otherwise
notified.
Dated: July 17, 2012.
Andrew J. Shapiro,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State.
Application of Star Marianas Air, Inc.
for Commuter Authority
The meeting will be held at
the University Club Atop Symphony
Towers, San Diego, CA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Hellstern, DFO for ITAC–11 at
(202) 482–3222, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Agenda topics to be discussed are:
—Pre-Decisional Deliberations on a
draft Letter of Recommendation on
U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service
Proposed New Increases in Fees.
—Access to and use of U.S. Small
Business Administration State Trade
and Export Promotion (STEP) Grants
by San Diego-area business.
—Congressional perspective on trade
barriers for small and minority
business.
—Update on pending trade legislation
that would impact small and minority
businesses.
ADDRESSES:
Christine L. Turner,
Assistant U.S. Trade Representative,
Intergovernmental Affairs and Public
Engagement.
[FR Doc. 2012–18016 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190–W2–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket DOT–OST–2010–0235]
Department of Transportation.
Notice of Order to Show Cause
(Order 2012–7–21).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
[FR Doc. 2012–18043 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
The Department of
Transportation is directing all interested
persons to show cause why it should
not issue an order tentatively finding
Star Marianas Air, Inc., fit, willing, and
able to provide scheduled passenger
service as a commuter air carrier using
small aircraft pursuant to Part 135 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations.
DATES: Persons wishing to file
objections should do so no later than
July 31, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to
objections should be filed in Docket
DOT–OST–2010–0235 and addressed to
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, (M–30, Room W12–
SUMMARY:
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Notice of Meeting of the Industry Trade
Advisory Committee on Small and
Minority Business (ITAC–11)
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice of a partially opened
meeting.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
The Industry Trade Advisory
Committee on Small and Minority
Business (ITAC–11) will hold a meeting
on Friday, August 10, 2012, from 9:00
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:06 Jul 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00189
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590, and should be served upon the
parties listed in Attachment A to the
order.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine J. O’Toole, Air Carrier Fitness
Division (X–56, Room W86–489), U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, (202) 366–9721.
Dated: July 17, 2012.
Susan L. Kurland,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and
International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012–18042 Filed 7–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ITS Industry Forum on Connected
Vehicles: Moving From Research
Towards Implementation; Notice of
Public Meeting
ITS Joint Program Office,
Research and Innovative Technology
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Transportation (USDOT) Intelligent
Transportation System Joint Program
Office (ITS JPO) will host a free public
meeting and webinar to provide updates
and promote a lively discussion on the
Connected Vehicle Safety, Vehicle-toInfrastructure, and Testing programs;
along with a special session discussing
lessons learned in deploying ITS. The
public meeting will take place
September 25–27, 2012, 9:00 a.m.–4:30
p.m. at the Hyatt Regency Chicago, 151
East Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois,
USA 60601, 312–565–1234. Persons
planning to attend the meeting or
participate in the webinar should
register online at www.itsa.org/
safetymeeting no later than August 30,
2012.
The goal of the meeting and webinar
is to identify where we are and what
remains in getting to the 2013 decision
on Vehicle Communications for Safety,
discuss what is evolving in terms of a
robust Vehicle-to-Infrastructure
environment, and identify what we have
learned from past ITS deployments that
can help with success for the future.
About the Connected Vehicle Research
Program at USDOT
Connected Vehicle research at
USDOT is a multimodal program that
involves using wireless communication
between vehicles, infrastructure, and
personal communications devices to
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43414-43416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18043]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7962]
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment Under
the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has
imposed statutory debarment pursuant to Sec. 127.7(c) of the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (``ITAR'') (22 CFR Parts 120
to 130) on persons convicted of violating, or conspiracy to violate,
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended (``AECA'') (22
U.S.C. 2778). Further, a public notice was published in the Federal
Register on Tuesday, November 15, 2011, listing persons statutorily
debarred pursuant to the ITAR; this notice makes one correction to that
notice.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date is the date of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Aguirre, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-Military
Affairs, Department of State (202) 632-2798.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C.
2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of State from issuing licenses or
other approvals for the export of defense articles or defense services
where the applicant, or any party to the export, has been convicted of
violating certain statutes, including the AECA. The statute permits
limited exceptions to be made on a case-by-case basis. In implementing
this provision, Section 127.7 of the ITAR provides for ``statutory
debarment'' of any person who has been convicted of violating or
conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons subject to statutory debarment
are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the export
of defense articles, including technical data, or in the furnishing of
defense services for which a license or other approval is required.
Statutory debarment is based solely upon conviction in a criminal
proceeding, conducted by a United States Court, and as such the
administrative debarment procedures outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR
are not applicable.
The period for debarment will be determined by the Assistant
Secretary for Political-Military Affairs based on the underlying nature
of the violations, but will generally be for three years from the date
of conviction. Export privileges may be reinstated only at the request
of the debarred person followed by the necessary interagency
consultations, after a thorough review of the circumstances surrounding
the conviction, and a finding that appropriate steps have been taken to
mitigate any law enforcement concerns, as required by Section 38(g)(4)
of the AECA. Unless export privileges are reinstated, however, the
person remains debarred.
Department of State policy permits debarred persons to apply to the
Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, for
reinstatement beginning one year after the date of the debarment. Any
decision to grant reinstatement can be made only after the statutory
requirements of Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA have been satisfied.
Exceptions, also known as transaction exceptions, may be made to
this debarment determination on a case-by-case basis at the discretion
of the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs,
after consulting with the appropriate U.S. agencies. However, such an
exception would be granted only after a full review of all
circumstances, paying particular attention to the following factors:
whether an exception is warranted by overriding U.S. foreign policy or
national security interests; whether an exception would further law
enforcement concerns that are consistent with the foreign policy or
national security interests of the United States; or whether other
compelling circumstances exist that are consistent with the foreign
policy or national security interests of the United States, and that do
not conflict with law enforcement concerns. Even if exceptions are
granted, the debarment continues until subsequent reinstatement.
Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and Section 127.7(c) of
the ITAR, the following persons are statutorily debarred as of the date
of this notice (Name; Date of Conviction; District; Case No.; Month/
Year of Birth):
(1) Miguel Avendano-Reyna; April 30, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00999-S1-001; April, 1976.
(2) Davoud Baniameri (aka Davoud Baniamery, David Baniameri, David
Baniamery); August 12, 2011; U.S. District Court, Northern District of
Illinois; Case No. 09-CR-736-1; August, 1972.
(3) Donald V. Bernardo; November 16, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Florida; Case No. 1:10-60331-CR-SEITZ-1; November,
1938.
(4) Jorge Blanco-Castillo; September 20, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:11CR00178-001; November, 1969.
(5) Igor Bobel; May 11, 2012; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of
Pennsylvania; Case No. 11-CR-00749-HB-1; February, 1968.
(6) Oscar Edwardo Cantu; March 21, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00686-S1-001; March, 1980.
(7) Henson Chua; November 8, 2011; U.S. District Court, Middle District
of Florida; Case No. 8:11-CR-137-T-30AEP; January, 1964.
(8) Kue Sang Chun; November 15, 2011; U.S. District Court, Northern
District of Ohio; Case No. 1:11CR00009-001; October, 1943.
(9) Luz Sylvia Cortez; November 28, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR00061-002; April, 1976.
(10) Dan Tran Dang; April 16, 2012; U.S. District Court, Central
District of California; Case No. SACR 08-00322-CJC; December, 1954.
(11) Santos Isidro de la Paz; May 11, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00396-007; September, 1988.
(12) Anna Fermanova; October 26, 2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern
District of New York; Case No. CR11-00008(CBA); July, 1986.
(13) Galaxy Aviation Services; June 30, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Middle District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10-CR-00058-004-MTT; N/A.
(14) Ruslan Gilchenko; February 4, 2011; U.S. District Court, District
of Arizona; Case No. CR10-00233-001-PHX-FJM; October, 1976.
(15) Juan Victorian Gimenez; March 21, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Florida; Case No. 1:11-20669-CR-MARTINEZ-1;
October, 1983.
(16) Enrique Gustavo Gonzalez; April 28, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01032-001; September, 1990.
(17) Issac Obed Gonzalez; July 11, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
[[Page 43415]]
District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01171-001; October, 1989.
(18) Steven Neal Greenoe; January 10, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Eastern District of North Carolina; Case No. 5:10-CR-277-1H; November,
1973.
(19) Stephen Glen Guerra; February 6, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Western District of Texas; Case No. W-11-CR-200(04); February, 1979.
(20) Oscar Hernandez-Bravo (aka Oscar Bravo Hernandez); April 4, 2012;
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:09CR00809-
S1-001; February, 1971.
(21) Chou-Fu Ho; September 20, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of California; Case No. 10CR2415 BTM; September, 1971.
(22) Rene Huerta, Jr.; August 16, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR01396-001; October, 1972.
(23) Liem Duc Huynh (aka Duc Huynh); April 17, 2012; U.S. District
Court, Central District of California; Case No. SACR 08-00322-CJC;
September, 1959.
(24) Octavio Ibarra-Sanchez; February 22, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR01518-001; March, 1984.
(25) Phillip Andro Jamison; November 8, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of California; Case No. 10CR3618-H; February, 1980.
(26) Young Su Kim; August 19, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Colorado; Case No. 11-cr-00171-LTB-01; August, 1953.
(27) Marc Knapp; September 13, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Delaware; Case No. 10CR108-LPS; December, 1974.
(28) Connor H. Kraegel; August 24, 2011; U.S. District Court, District
of Maryland; Case No. AW-8-11-CR-0273-001; October, 1990.
(29) Li Li (aka Lea Li); October 3, 2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern
District of Virginia; Case No. 1:10CR00207-002; April, 1978.
(30) Mario Julian Martinez-Bernache; March 15, 2012; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:11CR00759-001; August,
1989.
(31) Scott Michael Miller; December 1, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of New York; Case No. 06 Crim. 0566 (DC); August,
1958.
(32) Placido Molina, Jr.; March 2, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No. 1:11CR00530-001; September, 1984.
(33) Balraj Naidu; December 20, 2010; U.S. District Court, District of
Maryland; Case No. CCB-1-08-CR-00091-002; February, 1967.
(34) Jamal Nehme; May 26, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Delaware; Case No. 09-CR-74-01 GMS; April, 1963.
(35) Joseph Oldani; June 3, 2009; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of West Virginia; Case No. 3:08-00287; August, 1987.
(36) Timothy Oldani; June 3, 2009; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of West Virginia; Case No. 3:09-00010; November, 1984.
(37) John Dennis Tan Ong (aka Dennis Ong, John Tan Ong); December 19,
2011; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10-
cr-352-JEC-01; November, 1973.
(38) Juan Narcizo Oyervides-Campos; November 21, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00338-001; July,
1990.
(39) Manuel Mario Pavon; January 13, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR01434-S-001; June, 1991.
(40) Jerome Stuart Pendzich; October 12, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Eastern District of Tennessee; Case No. 3:10-CR-168-001; March, 1977.
(41) Lee Roy Perez; December 13, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00389-001; July, 1987.
(42) Julio Alejandro Quirino; August 31, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01171-002; November, 1984.
(43) Ramadan Rama; July 21, 2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern District
of North Carolina; Case No. 5:10-CR-397-1D; December, 1970.
(44) Martin Ramirez-Rodriguez (aka Julian Garcia-Penaloza, Alberto
Moreno-Garza, Machin Aguilar-Gaona); November 9, 2010; U.S. District
Court, Northern District of Florida; Case No. 5:10CR39-002-RS; October,
1983.
(45) Jose Arturo Ramon-Herrada; February 24, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00853-002; February, 1983.
(46) Felix Reyes; July 28, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern District
of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01500-001; March, 1992.
(47) Jose Guadalupe Reyes-Martinez; November 21, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00396-010; September,
1982.
(48) Adrian Jesus Reyna; January 27, 2012; U.S. District Court, Western
District of Texas; Case No. W-11-CR-200(01); July, 1986.
(49) Gerardo Domingo Rodriguez-Rivera; January 13, 2012; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR01434-S-002; June,
1993.
(50) Nestor Omar Sauceda-Trevino; July 18, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:11CR00240-001; May, 1990.
(51) Hamid Seifi, (aka Hank Seifi); July 5, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Middle District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10-CR-00058-003-MTT;
March, 1963.
(52) Chan Hok Shek, (aka John Chan); September 27, 2011; U.S.
District Court, District of Massachusetts; Case No. 1:08-CR-10317-001-
DPW; December, 1953.
(53) Andrew Silcox; March 1, 2012; U.S. District Court, Western
District of Texas; Case No. SA-11-CR-883(1)FB; March, 1958.
(54) Oscar Sorroza-Garcia; July 5, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of California; Case No. 09CR3600-BEN; October, 1973.
(55) Staff Gasket Manufacturing Corp.; September 15, 2011; U.S.
District Court, District of New Jersey; Case No. 2:CR11-0256-01; N/A.
(56) Swiss Technology, Inc.; November 15, 2011; U.S. District
Court, District of New Jersey; Case No. 2:11-CR-473-JLL-01; N/A.
(57) Leonardo Talamantez; April 23, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Western District of Texas; Case No. DR-11-CR-1354(2)-AM; July, 1986.
(58) The Parts Guys, LLC; November 3, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Middle District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10-CR-00058-002-MTT; N/A.
(59) Michael Edward Todd; November 8, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Middle District of Georgia; Case No. 5:10-CR-00058-001-MTT; June, 1980.
(60) Alfonso Torres; May 12, 2012; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00687-001; October, 1970.
(61) Hong Wei Xian, (aka Harry Zan); October 3, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Eastern District of Virginia; Case No. 1:10CR00207-001;
December, 1978.
(62) Lian Yang; October 27, 2011; U.S. District Court, Western
District of Washington; Case No. 2:11CR00094TSZ-001; February, 1964.
(63) Nguessan Yao; December 15, 2011; U.S. District Court, Northern
District of California; Case No. CR-10-00434-002; January, 1955.
(64) Edgar Daniel Zapata; April 30, 2012; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00396-001; August, 1980.
As noted above, at the end of the three-year period following the
date of this notice, the above named persons/entities remain debarred
unless export privileges are reinstated.
[[Page 43416]]
Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in
activity regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., sections 120.1(c) and (d),
and 127.11(a)). Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the ITAR, any person
who has knowledge that another person is subject to debarment or is
otherwise ineligible may not, without disclosure to and written
approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, participate,
directly or indirectly, in any export in which such ineligible person
may benefit there from or have a direct or indirect interest therein.
Further, Federal Register document 2011-29470, published at 76 FR
70805, Tuesday, November 15, 2011, is corrected on page 70807, line 12
through line 15 to read as follows:
1. Andrew V. ODonnell; August 1, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Northern District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10-CR-491-CAP; July, 1977.
That notice of statutory debarment incorrectly identified the debarred
party as ``Andrew V. O'Donnell'' and the Month/Year of birth of the
debarred party as ``July, 1997.''
This notice is provided for purposes of making the public aware
that the persons listed above are prohibited from participating
directly or indirectly in activities regulated by the ITAR, including
any brokering activities and in any export from or temporary import
into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or
defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR. Specific case
information may be obtained from the Office of the Clerk for the U.S.
District Courts mentioned above and by citing the court case number
where provided.
Dated: July 17, 2012.
Andrew J. Shapiro,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-18043 Filed 7-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
