Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; the 2002 Base Year Inventory, 42686-42688 [2012-17770]
Download as PDF
42686
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 140 / Friday, July 20, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 12, 2012.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2012–17768 Filed 7–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0140; FRL–9702–1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; the 2002 Base Year
Inventory
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 2002
base year emissions inventory portion of
the Maryland State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of
Maryland, through the Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE),
on April 3, 2008. The emissions
inventory is part of the Maryland April
3, 2008 SIP revision that was submitted
to meet nonattainment requirements
related to Maryland’s portion of the
Washington DC-MD-VA nonattainment
area (hereafter referred to as Maryland
Area or Area) for the 1997 PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) SIP. EPA is proposing to
approve the 2002 base year PM2.5
emissions inventory in accordance with
the requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received on or before August 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2010–0140 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: mastro.donna@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0140,
Donna Mastro, Acting Associate
Director, Office of Air Program
Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jul 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2010–
0140. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Asrah Khadr, (215) 814–2071, or by
email at khadr.asrah@epa.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Summary of SIP Revision
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38652),
EPA established the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS, including an annual standard
of 15.0 mg/m3 based on a 3-year average
of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations,
and a 24-hour (or daily) standard of 65
mg/m3 based on a 3-year average of the
98th percentile of 24-hour
concentrations. EPA established the
standards based on significant evidence
and numerous health studies
demonstrating that serious health effects
are associated with exposures to PM2.5.
Following promulgation of a new or
revised NAAQS, EPA is required by the
CAA to designate areas throughout the
United States as attaining or not
attaining the NAAQS; this designation
process is described in section 107(d)(1)
of the CAA. In 1999, EPA and state airquality agencies initiated the monitoring
process for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS and,
by January 2001, established a complete
set of air-quality monitors. On January
5, 2005, EPA promulgated initial airquality designations for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS (70 FR 944), which became
effective on April 5, 2005, based on airquality monitoring data for calendar
years 2001–03.
On April 14, 2005, EPA promulgated
a supplemental rule amending the
agency’s initial designations (70 FR
19844), with the same effective date
(April 5, 2005) at 70 FR 944. As a result
of this supplemental rule, PM2.5
nonattainment designations are in effect
for 39 areas, comprising 208 counties
within 20 states (and the District of
Columbia) nationwide, with a combined
population of approximately 88 million.
The Maryland Area which is the subject
of this rulemaking was included in the
list of areas not attaining the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS. The Maryland Area consists of
the following counties in Maryland:
Charles, Frederick, Montgomery and
Prince Georges.
On January 12, 2009 (74 FR 1146),
EPA determined that Maryland had
attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in the
Maryland Area. That determination was
based upon quality assured, quality
controlled and certified ambient air
monitoring data that showed the Area
had monitored attainment of the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS for the 2004–2006
monitoring period and that continued to
show attainment of the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS based on 2005–2007 data. The
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 140 / Friday, July 20, 2012 / Proposed Rules
January 12, 2009 determination
suspended the requirements for
Maryland to submit an attainment
demonstration, associated reasonably
available control measures, a reasonable
further progress plan, contingency
measures, and other planning SIP
revisions related to attainment of the
standard for so long as the
nonattainment area continues to meet
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. On March 5,
2012, MDE submitted a request for
withdrawal of the Maryland 1997 PM2.5
SIP revisions including the withdrawal
of the attainment plan, analysis of
reasonably available control measures,
attainment demonstration, contingency
plans and mobile source budgets. To
meet the requirements of CAA section
172(c)(3), Maryland did not request the
withdrawal of the 2002 base year
emission inventory portion of the 1997
PM2.5 SIP revisions. Section 172(c)(3) of
the CAA requires submission and
approval of a comprehensive, accurate,
and current inventory of actual
emissions.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The 2002 base year emission
inventory submitted by MDE on April 3,
2008 includes emissions estimates that
cover the general source categories of
point sources, non-road mobile sources,
area sources, on-road mobile sources,
and biogenic sources. The pollutants
that comprise the inventory are nitrogen
oxides (NOX), volatile organic
42687
compounds (VOCs), PM2.5, coarse
particles (PM10), ammonia (NH3) and
sulfur dioxide (SO2). EPA has reviewed
the results, procedures and
methodologies for the base year
emissions inventory submitted by MDE.
The year 2002 was selected by MDE as
the base year for the emissions
inventory per 40 CFR 51.1008(b). A
discussion of the emissions inventory
development as well as the emissions
inventory can be found in Appendix B
of the April 3, 2008 SIP submittal.
Table 1, below, provides a summary
of the annual 2002 emissions of NOX,
VOCs, PM2.5, PM10, NH3 and SO2 which
were included in the Maryland
submittal.
TABLE 1—EMISSIONS OF POLLUTANTS IN TONS PER YEAR (TPY)
NOX
VOCs
PM2.5
PM10
NH3
SO2
Emissions (TPY) ......................................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Pollutant
109,041.17
98,626.04
12,825.42
30,826.06
5,174.36
169,788.65
The CAA section 172(c)(3) emissions
inventory is developed by the
incorporation of data from multiple
sources. States were required to develop
and submit to EPA a triennial emissions
inventory according to the Consolidated
Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) for all
source categories (i.e., point, area,
nonroad mobile and on-road mobile).
The 2002 emissions inventory was
based on data developed by the MDE
Air and Radiation Management
Administration (MDE–ARMA), the
Maryland Department of Transportation
(MDOT), the Metropolitan Washington
Council of Government (MWCOG), and
EPA for biogenic sources. The data were
developed according to current EPA
emissions inventory guidance
‘‘Emissions Inventory Guidance for
Implementation of Ozone and
Particulate Matter NAAQS and Regional
Haze Regulations,’’ August 2005. EPA
preliminarily agrees that the process
used to develop this inventory and the
emissions inventory is adequate to meet
the requirements of CAA section
172(c)(3), the implementing regulations,
and EPA guidance for emission
inventories. More information regarding
the review of the base year inventory
can be found in the technical support
document (TSD) titled ‘‘2002 SIP Base
Year Inventory’’ that is located in this
docket.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the 2002
base year emissions inventory portion of
the SIP revision submitted by the State
of Maryland through MDE on April 3,
2008. We have made the preliminary
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jul 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
determination that this action is
consistent with section 110 of the CAA.
EPA is soliciting public comments on
the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule,
pertaining to the PM2.5 2002 base year
emissions inventory portion of the
Maryland SIP, does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the
state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
42688
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 140 / Friday, July 20, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 10, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012–17770 Filed 7–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 120403249–2230–01]
RIN 0648–BC03
Snapper-Grouper Fishery Off the
Southern Atlantic States; SnapperGrouper Management Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS publishes this
proposed rule to implement a regulatory
amendment (Regulatory Amendment
12) to the Fishery Management Plan for
the Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the
South Atlantic Region (FMP), as
prepared by the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (Council). If
implemented, this rule would modify
the golden tilefish annual catch limit
(ACL), which would be equal to the
optimum yield (OY), as well as revise
the recreational accountability measures
(AMs) for golden tilefish in the South
Atlantic exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
The intent of this rule is to modify
management measures for golden
tilefish in the commercial and
recreational sectors in the South
Atlantic based on new stock assessment
analyses.
DATES: Written comments on this
proposed rule must be received on or
before August 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule identified by
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2012–0087’’ by any of
the following methods:
• Electronic submissions: Submit
electronic comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
‘‘Instructions’’ for submitting comments.
• Mail: Karla Gore, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:24 Jul 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
N/A in the required field if you wish to
remain anonymous).
To submit comments through the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, enter ‘‘NOAA–
NMFS–2012–0087’’ in the search field
and click on ‘‘search.’’ After you locate
the document ‘‘Snapper-Grouper
Fishery off the Southern Atlantic States;
Snapper-Grouper Management
Measures,’’ click the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ link in that row. This will
display the comment Web form. You
can then enter your submitter
information (unless you prefer to remain
anonymous), and type your comment on
the Web form. You can also attach
additional files (up to 10MB) in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
Comments received through means
not specified in this rule will not be
considered.
For further assistance with submitting
a comment, see the ‘‘Commenting’’
section at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!faqs or the Help section at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Electronic copies of documents
supporting this proposed rule including
an environmental assessment, initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA),
regulatory impact review, and fishery
impact statement may be obtained from
the Southeast Regional Office Web site
at https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sf/
SASnapperGrouperHomepage.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karla Gore, telephone: 727–824–5305,
or email: Karla.Gore@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
snapper-grouper fishery of the South
Atlantic is managed under the FMP. The
FMP was prepared by the Council and
is implemented through regulations at
50 CFR part 622 under the authority of
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
Background
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
NMFS and the regional fishery
management councils to prevent
overfishing, to achieve (on a continuing
basis) the OY from federally managed
fish stocks, and to rebuild stocks that
have been determined to be overfished.
These mandates ensure management of
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
fishery resources for the greatest overall
benefit to the nation, particularly with
respect to providing food production
and recreational opportunities, and
protecting marine ecosystems.
Reauthorization of the MagnusonStevens Act in 2007 required
implementation of new tools to help
end and prevent overfishing to achieve
the OY from a fishery. The tools are
ACLs and AMs.
An ACL is the level of annual catch
of a stock that, if met or exceeded,
triggers some corrective action through
AMs. The AMs are management
controls to prevent exceeding the ACLs
and to correct for overages of ACLs if
they occur. An AM might be an inseason closure if catch approaches the
ACL, or it may require reducing the ACL
for the following fishing year because of
an overage that occurred during the
previous fishing year. ACLs may not
exceed the overfishing limit (OFL) and
the acceptable biological catch (ABC).
The OFL is an estimate of the catch
level above which overfishing is
occurring and may come from a stock
assessment. The ABC is defined as the
level of a stock’s annual catch that
accounts for the scientific uncertainty in
the estimate of OFL and any other
scientific uncertainty, and is based on
the Council’s ABC control rule.
Management Measures Contained in
This Proposed Rule
This proposed rule, if implemented,
would modify the ACL for golden
tilefish. In 2011, ACLs and AMs were
implemented for golden tilefish through
the Amendment 17B to the FMP (75 FR
82280, December 30, 2010). Since then,
golden tilefish have been assessed
through the Southeast Data, Assessment,
and Review (SEDAR) process using data
through 2010. The stock assessment for
golden tilefish indicated that the South
Atlantic population is not overfished
nor undergoing overfishing. Results
from the recent stock assessment
(SEDAR 25 2011) suggest that the
current South Atlantic golden tilefish
ACL (326,554 lb (148,122 kg), round
weight, or 291,566 lb (132,252 kg),
gutted weight), can be increased. The
current South Atlantic golden tilefish
commercial ACL is 316,757 lb (143,679
kg), round weight, or 282,819 lb
(128,285 kg), gutted weight; and the
recreational ACL is 1,578 fish. If
implemented, the commercial and
recreational ACLs for golden tilefish in
the South Atlantic would be set at the
yield associated with 75 percent fishing
mortality that will produce the
maximum sustainable yield (MSY)
while the population is at equilibrium.
Therefore, this proposed rule would
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42686-42688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17770]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0140; FRL-9702-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; the 2002 Base Year Inventory
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve the fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) 2002 base year emissions inventory portion of the
Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of Maryland, through the Maryland Department of the Environment
(MDE), on April 3, 2008. The emissions inventory is part of the
Maryland April 3, 2008 SIP revision that was submitted to meet
nonattainment requirements related to Maryland's portion of the
Washington DC-MD-VA nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as
Maryland Area or Area) for the 1997 PM2.5 National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) SIP. EPA is proposing to approve the 2002
base year PM2.5 emissions inventory in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2010-0140 by one of the following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. Email: mastro.donna@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0140, Donna Mastro, Acting Associate
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2010-0140. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment, 1800
Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Asrah Khadr, (215) 814-2071, or by
email at khadr.asrah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Summary of SIP Revision
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Throughout this document, whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is
used, we mean EPA. On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38652), EPA established the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, including an annual standard of 15.0
[micro]g/m\3\ based on a 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5
concentrations, and a 24-hour (or daily) standard of 65 [micro]g/m\3\
based on a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour
concentrations. EPA established the standards based on significant
evidence and numerous health studies demonstrating that serious health
effects are associated with exposures to PM2.5.
Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, EPA is required
by the CAA to designate areas throughout the United States as attaining
or not attaining the NAAQS; this designation process is described in
section 107(d)(1) of the CAA. In 1999, EPA and state air-quality
agencies initiated the monitoring process for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS and, by January 2001, established a complete set of air-quality
monitors. On January 5, 2005, EPA promulgated initial air-quality
designations for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS (70 FR 944), which
became effective on April 5, 2005, based on air-quality monitoring data
for calendar years 2001-03.
On April 14, 2005, EPA promulgated a supplemental rule amending the
agency's initial designations (70 FR 19844), with the same effective
date (April 5, 2005) at 70 FR 944. As a result of this supplemental
rule, PM2.5 nonattainment designations are in effect for 39
areas, comprising 208 counties within 20 states (and the District of
Columbia) nationwide, with a combined population of approximately 88
million. The Maryland Area which is the subject of this rulemaking was
included in the list of areas not attaining the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS. The Maryland Area consists of the following counties in
Maryland: Charles, Frederick, Montgomery and Prince Georges.
On January 12, 2009 (74 FR 1146), EPA determined that Maryland had
attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in the Maryland Area. That
determination was based upon quality assured, quality controlled and
certified ambient air monitoring data that showed the Area had
monitored attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS for the 2004-
2006 monitoring period and that continued to show attainment of the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS based on 2005-2007 data. The
[[Page 42687]]
January 12, 2009 determination suspended the requirements for Maryland
to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available
control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency
measures, and other planning SIP revisions related to attainment of the
standard for so long as the nonattainment area continues to meet the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. On March 5, 2012, MDE submitted a request
for withdrawal of the Maryland 1997 PM2.5 SIP revisions
including the withdrawal of the attainment plan, analysis of reasonably
available control measures, attainment demonstration, contingency plans
and mobile source budgets. To meet the requirements of CAA section
172(c)(3), Maryland did not request the withdrawal of the 2002 base
year emission inventory portion of the 1997 PM2.5 SIP
revisions. Section 172(c)(3) of the CAA requires submission and
approval of a comprehensive, accurate, and current inventory of actual
emissions.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The 2002 base year emission inventory submitted by MDE on April 3,
2008 includes emissions estimates that cover the general source
categories of point sources, non-road mobile sources, area sources, on-
road mobile sources, and biogenic sources. The pollutants that comprise
the inventory are nitrogen oxides (NOX), volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), PM2.5, coarse particles (PM10),
ammonia (NH3) and sulfur dioxide (SO2). EPA has
reviewed the results, procedures and methodologies for the base year
emissions inventory submitted by MDE. The year 2002 was selected by MDE
as the base year for the emissions inventory per 40 CFR 51.1008(b). A
discussion of the emissions inventory development as well as the
emissions inventory can be found in Appendix B of the April 3, 2008 SIP
submittal.
Table 1, below, provides a summary of the annual 2002 emissions of
NOX, VOCs, PM2.5, PM10, NH3
and SO2 which were included in the Maryland submittal.
Table 1--Emissions of Pollutants in Tons per Year (TPY)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollutant NOX VOCs PM2.5 PM10 NH3 SO2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emissions (TPY)................................... 109,041.17 98,626.04 12,825.42 30,826.06 5,174.36 169,788.65
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CAA section 172(c)(3) emissions inventory is developed by the
incorporation of data from multiple sources. States were required to
develop and submit to EPA a triennial emissions inventory according to
the Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) for all source
categories (i.e., point, area, nonroad mobile and on-road mobile). The
2002 emissions inventory was based on data developed by the MDE Air and
Radiation Management Administration (MDE-ARMA), the Maryland Department
of Transportation (MDOT), the Metropolitan Washington Council of
Government (MWCOG), and EPA for biogenic sources. The data were
developed according to current EPA emissions inventory guidance
``Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implementation of Ozone and
Particulate Matter NAAQS and Regional Haze Regulations,'' August 2005.
EPA preliminarily agrees that the process used to develop this
inventory and the emissions inventory is adequate to meet the
requirements of CAA section 172(c)(3), the implementing regulations,
and EPA guidance for emission inventories. More information regarding
the review of the base year inventory can be found in the technical
support document (TSD) titled ``2002 SIP Base Year Inventory'' that is
located in this docket.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the 2002 base year emissions inventory
portion of the SIP revision submitted by the State of Maryland through
MDE on April 3, 2008. We have made the preliminary determination that
this action is consistent with section 110 of the CAA. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule, pertaining to the PM2.5
2002 base year emissions inventory portion of the Maryland SIP, does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply
in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
[[Page 42688]]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 10, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012-17770 Filed 7-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P