Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 34, 42251-42254 [2012-17495]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
threshold, we minimize the degree to
which restrictions will be imposed or
resources expended that do not
contribute substantially to species
conservation. But we have not set the
threshold so high that the phrase ‘‘in a
significant portion of its range’’ loses
independent meaning. Specifically, we
have not set the threshold as high as it
was under the interpretation presented
by the Service in the Defenders
litigation. Under that interpretation, the
portion of the range would have to be
so important that current imperilment
there would mean that the species
would be currently imperiled
everywhere. Under the definition of
‘‘significant’’ used in this finding, the
portion of the range need not rise to
such an exceptionally high level of
biological significance. (We recognize
that if the species is imperiled in a
portion that rises to that level of
biological significance, then we should
conclude that the species is in fact
imperiled throughout all of its range,
and that we would not need to rely on
the SPR language for such a listing.)
Rather, under this interpretation, we ask
whether the species would be
endangered everywhere without that
portion, i.e., if that portion were
completely extirpated. In other words,
the portion of the range need not be so
important that even the species being in
danger of extinction in that portion
would be sufficient to cause the species
in the remainder of the range to be
endangered; rather, the complete
extirpation (in a hypothetical future) of
the species in that portion would be
required to cause the species in the
remainder of the range to be
endangered.
The range of a species can
theoretically be divided into portions in
an infinite number of ways. However,
there is no purpose to analyzing
portions of the range that have no
reasonable potential to be significant or
to analyzing portions of the range in
which there is no reasonable potential
for the species to be endangered or
threatened. To identify only those
portions that warrant further
consideration, we determine whether
there is substantial information
indicating that: (1) The portions may be
‘‘significant,’’ and (2) the species may be
in danger of extinction there or likely to
become so within the foreseeable future.
Depending on the biology of the species,
its range, and the threats it faces, it
might be more efficient for us to address
the significance question first or the
status question first. Thus, if we
determine that a portion of the range is
not ‘‘significant,’’ we do not need to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Jul 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
determine whether the species is
endangered or threatened there; if we
determine that the species is not
endangered or threatened in a portion of
its range, we do not need to determine
if that portion is ‘‘significant.’’ In
practice, a key part of the determination
that a species is in danger of extinction
in a significant portion of its range is
whether the threats are geographically
concentrated in some way. If the threats
to the species are essentially uniform
throughout its range, no portion is likely
to warrant further consideration.
Moreover, if any concentration of
threats to the species occurs only in
portions of the species’ range that
clearly would not meet the biologically
based definition of ‘‘significant,’’ such
portions will not warrant further
consideration.
We evaluated the current range of the
four beetles to determine if there is any
apparent geographic concentration of
potential threats for any of the species.
The ranges for each of the beetles are
relatively small and limited to the local
dune system where they are found. We
examined potential threats from mining,
solar development projects, ORV use,
commercial filming, livestock grazing,
overutilization, disease or predation, the
inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms, stochastic events, and
climate change. We found no
concentration of threats that suggests
that any of these four species of dune
beetles may be in danger of extinction
in a portion of its range. We found no
portions of their ranges where potential
threats are significantly concentrated or
substantially greater than in other
portions of their ranges. Therefore, we
find that factors affecting each species
are essentially uniform throughout their
ranges, indicating no portion of the
range of any of the four species warrants
further consideration of possible
endangered or threatened status under
the Act. There is no available
information indicating that there has
been a range contraction for any of the
four species, and therefore we find that
lost historical range does not constitute
a significant portion of the range for the
Crescent Dunes aegialian scarab, the
Crescent Dunes serican scarab, the large
aegialian scarab, or the Giuliani’s dune
scarab.
We request that you submit any new
information concerning the status of, or
threats to, the Crescent Dunes aegialian
scarab, Crescent Dunes serican scarab,
large aegialian scarab, and Giuliani’s
dune scarab to our Nevada Fish and
Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES section)
whenever it becomes available. New
information will help us monitor these
four beetle species and encourage their
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42251
conservation. If an emergency situation
develops for any of these four beetle
species, we will act to provide
immediate protection.
References Cited
A complete list of references cited is
available on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov and upon request
from the Nevada Fish and Wildlife
Office (see ADDRESSES section).
Authors
The primary authors of this notice are
the staff members of the Nevada Fish
and Wildlife Office.
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: June 28, 2012.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–17526 Filed 7–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 120416008–2219–01]
RIN 0648–BB72
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico;
Amendment 34
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes regulations to
implement management measures
described in Amendment 34 to the
Fishery Management Plan for the Reef
Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico
(FMP) prepared by the Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council (Council).
If implemented, this rule would remove
the income qualification requirements
for renewal of Gulf of Mexico (Gulf)
commercial reef fish permits and
increase the maximum crew size to four
for dual-permitted vessels (i.e. vessels
that possess both a charter vessel/
headboat permit for Gulf reef fish and a
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish) that are fishing commercially. The
intent of this rule is to remove permit
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM
18JYP1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
42252
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
requirements that may no longer be
applicable to current commercial fishing
practices and to improve vessel safety in
the Gulf reef fish fishery.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 17, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule identified by
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2012–0025’’ by any of
the following methods:
• Electronic submissions: Submit
electronic comments via the Federal
e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Steve Branstetter, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and
NMFS will post them to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
To submit comments through the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, enter ‘‘NOAA–
NMFS–2011–0025’’ in the search field
and click on ‘‘search’’. After you locate
the proposed rule, click the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ link in that row. This will
display the comment web form. You can
enter your submitter information (unless
you prefer to remain anonymous), and
type your comment on the web form.
You can also attach additional files (up
to 10MB) in Microsoft Word, Excel,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats
only.
Comments received through means
not specified in this rule will not be
considered.
For further assistance with submitting
a comment, see the ‘‘Commenting’’
section at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!faqs or the Help section at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Electronic copies of Amendment 34,
which includes an environmental
assessment and a regulatory impact
review, may be obtained from the
Southeast Regional Office Web site at
https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sf/
GrouperSnapperandReefFish.htm.
Comments regarding the burden-hour
estimates or other aspects of the
collection-of-information requirements
contained in this proposed rule may be
submitted in writing to Anik Clemens,
Southeast Regional Office, NMFS, 263
13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL
33701; and OMB, by email at OIRA
Submission@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to
202–395–7285.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Jul 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Branstetter, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, telephone 727–824–5305;
email: Steve.Branstetter@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS and
the Council manage the Gulf reef fish
fishery under the FMP. The Council
prepared the FMP and NMFS
implements the FMP under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magunson-Stevens Act) by
regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
This rule would implement
Amendment 34 to the FMP, which
addresses administrative issues relative
to earned income requirements for the
renewal of commercial Gulf reef fish
permits and to the maximum crew size
for dual-permitted vessels while
commercially fishing. Due to recent
changes in the commercial sector of the
Gulf reef fish fishery the income
qualification requirements and the crew
size limit regulations may no longer
effectively serve their original purposes.
Measures Contained in This Proposed
Rule
If implemented, this rule would
eliminate the income qualification
requirements for renewal of commercial
Gulf reef fish permits and increase the
maximum crew size from three to four
for dual-permitted vessels.
Eliminating the Income Qualification
Requirements for Commercial Gulf Reef
Fish Permits
Under the current regulations, an
applicant renewing a commercial vessel
permit for Gulf reef fish must attest that
greater than 50 percent of his/her earned
income is derived from commercial
fishing (i.e. harvest and first sale of fish)
or charter fishing during either of the 2
calendar years preceding the
application. Applicants must complete
the Income Qualification Affidavit
section on the Federal Permit
Application for Vessels Fishing in the
EEZ (Federal Permit Application) as
proof of meeting permit income
qualification requirements for
commercial Gulf reef fish vessel
permits.
This rule proposes to eliminate the
income requirement because it is no
longer applicable to current commercial
fishing practices. The income
requirement is not compatible with
recent regulatory changes in the Gulf
reef fish fishery, such as the
implementation of individual fishing
quota (IFQ) programs for red snapper
and grouper/tilefish species, which
account for the majority of Gulf reef fish
landings. Regardless of the proportion of
a fisherman’s income derived from
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
commercial or charter fishing,
participation in these IFQ fisheries is
restricted to those who possess quota
shares or who sell annual allocation.
Removing the income requirement will
also provide more flexibility to
fishermen and allow them to earn
income in other occupations. This
added flexibility would allow some
fishermen to renew their permits even if
they did not have the opportunity to
earn enough income from fishing. In
addition, this income requirement is
relatively easy to meet or circumvent,
and validation of this income
requirement has been difficult. Finally,
the elimination of income requirements
would also decrease the administrative
burden to NMFS and the applicant by
simplifying the permit renewal process.
Increasing the Maximum Crew Size for
Dual-Permitted Vessels
The final rule for Amendment 1 to the
FMP (55 FR 2078, January 22, 1990)
established the commercial vessel
permit for Gulf reef fish and the threeperson crew size for dual-permitted
vessels when fishing commercially. In
2006, Amendment 18A to the FMP
modified the crew size rule to add the
Coast Guard certificate of inspection
(COI) provision that allowed vessels
with a COI to carry a minimum crew
size specified by the COI if it was
greater than three. Amendment 18A was
intended to resolve conflict between the
Council’s maximum crew size rule and
the Coast Guard’s minimum crew size
requirements for vessels with a COI,
which was at least four.
Historically, limiting the crew size on
a dual-permitted vessel when fishing
commercially may have served to
prevent a vessel from taking out a
number of passengers under the
pretense of making a charter trip, but
subsequently selling the catch. Under
current commercial fishing practices,
limiting the crew size of a vessel to
prevent selling catch caught on a charter
trip is no longer a primary concern. IFQ
programs now regulate commercially
harvested red snapper, grouper, and
tilefish species, which constitute the
majority of the commercial reef fish
landings. In addition, all commercial
Gulf reef fish vessels are required to be
equipped with vessel monitoring
systems. The strict reporting
requirements of these management
measures make it clear when a vessel is
operating as a commercial vessel. The
amount of IFQ shares owned by a
permit holder limits the amount of fish
harvested by a vessel regardless of the
crew size. In addition, due to the costs
involved with carrying extra crew, there
E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM
18JYP1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
would be little incentive to exceed the
necessary crew size.
Currently, 154 vessels possess both a
charter vessel/headboat permit and a
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish. These vessel are considered to be
dual-permitted vessels. Unless the
vessel has a COI, dual-permitted vessels
are limited to a three-person maximum
crew size. The current crew restriction
limits are of particular concern for
vessels conducting commercial
spearfishing operations. These activities
would be considered commercial diving
operations under the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) regulations. The OSHA
regulations for SCUBA diving
operations (29 CFR 1910.424(c)) require
that: (1) A standby diver is available
while the SCUBA diver is in the water
and (2) the SCUBA diver must be either
line-tended or accompanied by another
diver with continuous visual contact.
The OSHA regulations aim to establish
safe operating procedures for
conducting commercial SCUBA diving;
however, the three-person crew limit for
dual-permitted vessels impairs the
crew’s ability to comply with OSHA and
decreases the safety at sea, which
violates National Standard 10 of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act (16 U.S.C.
1851(a)(10)). Based on OSHA
regulations, if two divers are underwater
spearfishing, the third crewmember at
the surface would need to handle the
vessel and be the standby diver. If it is
necessary to have two crew members at
the surface, only one diver could be
underwater and would need to be linetended. Spearfishing while being linetended could cause additional safety
issues.
In addition, the Coast Guard Diving
Policies and Procedures Manual (2009)
states that ‘‘[a] minimum of four
personnel consisting of a diving
supervisor, diver, diver tender and a
standby diver are required to conduct
SCUBA operations.’’ While this is not a
regulation applicable to commercial
spearfishing vessels, it provides
guidance to increase safety of the diving
personnel.
This rule proposes to increase the
crew size from three to four for dualpermitted vessels to improve the safety
at sea issues while commercially
spearfishing, which would comply with
National Standard 10 of the MagnusonStevens Act. In addition, it allows
commercial spearfishing vessels to
comply with the OSHA diving
regulations and the U.S. Coast Guard
guidance for conducting diving
operations.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Jul 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the AA has
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with Amendment 34, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this determination
is as follows:
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to eliminate existing income
qualification requirements that may no
longer be applicable to the current
commercial fishing environment and to
improve vessel safety in the Gulf reef
fish fishery. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
provides the statutory basis for this
proposed rule.
This rule, if implemented, would be
expected to directly affect 920 vessels
that possess a commercial reef fish
permit. Among these entities, 154
vessels also possess a reef fish for-hire
permit. These vessels would be affected
by both actions in this proposed rule.
The average commercial vessel in the
reef fish fishery is estimated to earn
approximately $48,000 (2010 dollars).
The for-hire fleet is comprised of
charterboats, which charge a fee on a
vessel basis, and headboats, which
charge a fee on an individual angler
(head) basis. The average charterboat is
estimated to earn approximately
$89,000 (2010 dollars) in annual
revenue, while the average headboat is
estimated to earn approximately
$469,000 (2010 dollars). The average
revenue profile of dual-permitted
vessels is not available.
There have been no other small
entities identified that would be
expected to be directly affected by this
proposed rule.
The Small Business Administration
has established size criteria for all major
industry sectors in the U.S. including
fish harvesters. A business involved in
fish harvesting is classified as a small
business if it is independently owned
and operated, is not dominant in its
field of operation (including its
affiliates), and has combined annual
receipts not in excess of $4.0 million
(NAICS code 114111, finfish fishing) for
all its affiliated operations worldwide.
The revenue threshold for a business
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42253
involved in the for-hire fishing industry
is $7.0 million (NAICS code 713990,
recreational industries). Based on the
average revenue estimates provided
above, all commercial and for-hire
vessels expected to be directly affected
by this proposed rule are determined for
the purpose of this analysis to be small
business entities.
Neither action in this proposed rule
would be expected to result in any
reduction in profits for any small
entities. The two proposed actions
would either eliminate or lessen a
current restriction. The proposed
elimination of an income requirement
for the Gulf commercial reef fish permit
is expected to provide the opportunity
for fishermen to increase income from
non-fishing occupations without
jeopardizing their ability to renew their
commercial reef fish permit. This would
also eliminate the pressure to continue
to fish to maintain fishing income to
satisfy a permit requirement when
personal, economic, or other factors may
suggest fishing should not occur.
Finally, this rule would reduce the
reporting and recordkeeping burdens
currently imposed on applicants. In
particular, applicants would no longer
be required to complete the Income
Qualification Affidavit section on the
Federal Permit Application for Vessels
Fishing in the EEZ (Federal Permit
Application) as proof of meeting permit
income qualification requirements for
commercial Gulf reef fish vessel
permits. As a result, although the effects
are not quantifiable with available data,
this proposed action would be expected
to increase the economic benefits to
small entities.
The proposed increase in the
maximum crew size from three to four
persons for dual-permitted vessels
would allow increased flexibility for
affected vessels to carry the number of
crew best suited to the needs or
conditions of the trip. As a result,
although the effects are again
unquantifiable with available data,
increased economic benefits would be
expected to accrue to fishermen as a
result of this increased flexibility.
Therefore, the economic effects on small
entities of this proposed rule, if
implemented, are expected to be
positive and not constitute a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Because this proposed rule, if
implemented, would not be expected to
have a significant economic impact on
any small entities, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM
18JYP1
42254
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 18, 2012 / Proposed Rules
to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with, a
collection-of-information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), unless that
collection-of-information displays a
currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) control number.
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to the PRA. NMFS estimates the
removal of the income qualification
requirements for commercial Gulf reef
fish permit holders will result in a net
decrease in the time to complete the
Federal Permit Application (for all
applicants), however, the current
burden estimate (20 minutes per
applicant) to complete the application
form would not decrease because the
time to complete the Income
Qualification Affidavit is minimal
compared to the time to complete the
entire application.
These requirements have been
submitted to OMB for approval. NMFS
seeks public comment regarding:
Whether this proposed collection-ofinformation is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection-of-information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
regarding the burden estimate or any
other aspect of the collection-ofinformation requirement, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to
NMFS and to OMB (see ADDRESSES).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Dated: July 13, 2012.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, performing the
functions and duties of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:29 Jul 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 622.2, the definition for
‘‘charter vessel’’ is revised to read as
follows:
§ 622.2
Definitions and acronyms.
*
*
*
*
*
Charter vessel means a vessel less
than 100 gross tons (90.8 mt) that is
subject to the requirements of the USCG
to carry six or fewer passengers for hire
and that engages in charter fishing at
any time during the calendar year. A
charter vessel with a commercial
permit, as required under § 622.4(a)(2),
is considered to be operating as a
charter vessel when it carries a
passenger who pays a fee or when there
are more than three persons aboard,
including operator and crew, except for
a charter vessel with a commercial
vessel permit for Gulf reef fish. A
charter vessel that has a charter vessel
permit for Gulf reef fish and a
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish is considered to be operating as a
charter vessel when it carries a
passenger who pays a fee or when there
are more than four persons aboard,
including operator and crew. A charter
vessel that has a charter vessel permit
for Gulf reef fish, a commercial vessel
permit for Gulf reef fish, and a valid
Certificate of Inspection (COI) issued by
the USCG to carry passengers for hire
will not be considered to be operating
as a charter vessel provided—
(1) It is not carrying a passenger who
pays a fee; and
(2) When underway for more than 12
hours, that vessel meets, but does not
exceed the minimum manning
requirements outlined in its COI for
vessels underway over 12 hours; or
when underway for not more than 12
hours, that vessel meets the minimum
manning requirements outlined in its
COI for vessels underway for not more
than 12 hours (if any), and does not
exceed the minimum manning
requirements outlined in its COI for
vessels that are underway for more than
12 hours.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
3. In § 622.4, paragraphs (m)(3),
(m)(4), and (m)(5) are removed;
paragraph (m)(6) is redesignated as
paragraph (m)(3); and paragraphs
(a)(2)(v) and (m)(2) are revised to read
as follows:
§ 622.4
Permits and fees.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(v) Gulf reef fish. For a person aboard
a vessel to be eligible for exemption
from the bag limits, to fish under a
quota, as specified in § 622.42(a)(1), or
to sell Gulf reef fish in or from the Gulf
EEZ, a commercial vessel permit for
Gulf reef fish must have been issued to
the vessel and must be on board. If
Federal regulations for Gulf reef fish in
subparts A, B, or C of this part are more
restrictive than state regulations, a
person aboard a vessel for which a
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish has been issued must comply with
such Federal regulations regardless of
where the fish are harvested. See
paragraph (a)(2)(ix) of this section
regarding an IFQ vessel account
required to fish for, possess, or land
Gulf red snapper or Gulf groupers and
tilefishes and paragraph (a)(2)(xiv) of
this section regarding an additional
bottom longline endorsement required
to fish for Gulf reef fish with bottom
longline gear in a portion of the eastern
Gulf. See paragraph (m) of this section
regarding a limited access system for
commercial vessel permits for Gulf reef
fish.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(2) A permit holder may transfer the
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish to another vessel owned by the
same entity. A permit holder may also
transfer the commercial vessel permit
for Gulf reef fish to the owner of another
vessel or to a new vessel owner when
he or she transfers ownership of the
permitted vessel.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–17495 Filed 7–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\18JYP1.SGM
18JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42251-42254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17495]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 120416008-2219-01]
RIN 0648-BB72
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 34
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to implement management measures
described in Amendment 34 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef
Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico (FMP) prepared by the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council). If implemented, this rule
would remove the income qualification requirements for renewal of Gulf
of Mexico (Gulf) commercial reef fish permits and increase the maximum
crew size to four for dual-permitted vessels (i.e. vessels that possess
both a charter vessel/headboat permit for Gulf reef fish and a
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish) that are fishing
commercially. The intent of this rule is to remove permit
[[Page 42252]]
requirements that may no longer be applicable to current commercial
fishing practices and to improve vessel safety in the Gulf reef fish
fishery.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 17, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rule identified by
``NOAA-NMFS-2012-0025'' by any of the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Submit electronic comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Steve Branstetter, Southeast Regional Office, NMFS,
263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and NMFS will post them to https://www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do
not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
To submit comments through the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov, enter ``NOAA-NMFS-2011-0025'' in the search field
and click on ``search''. After you locate the proposed rule, click the
``Submit a Comment'' link in that row. This will display the comment
web form. You can enter your submitter information (unless you prefer
to remain anonymous), and type your comment on the web form. You can
also attach additional files (up to 10MB) in Microsoft Word, Excel,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Comments received through means not specified in this rule will not
be considered.
For further assistance with submitting a comment, see the
``Commenting'' section at https://www.regulations.gov/#!faqs or the Help
section at https://www.regulations.gov.
Electronic copies of Amendment 34, which includes an environmental
assessment and a regulatory impact review, may be obtained from the
Southeast Regional Office Web site at https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sf/GrouperSnapperandReefFish.htm.
Comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of
the collection-of-information requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted in writing to Anik Clemens, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701; and OMB,
by email at OIRA Submission@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to 202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Branstetter, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, telephone 727-824-5305; email:
Steve.Branstetter@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS and the Council manage the Gulf reef
fish fishery under the FMP. The Council prepared the FMP and NMFS
implements the FMP under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magunson-Stevens Act) by regulations
at 50 CFR part 622.
This rule would implement Amendment 34 to the FMP, which addresses
administrative issues relative to earned income requirements for the
renewal of commercial Gulf reef fish permits and to the maximum crew
size for dual-permitted vessels while commercially fishing. Due to
recent changes in the commercial sector of the Gulf reef fish fishery
the income qualification requirements and the crew size limit
regulations may no longer effectively serve their original purposes.
Measures Contained in This Proposed Rule
If implemented, this rule would eliminate the income qualification
requirements for renewal of commercial Gulf reef fish permits and
increase the maximum crew size from three to four for dual-permitted
vessels.
Eliminating the Income Qualification Requirements for Commercial Gulf
Reef Fish Permits
Under the current regulations, an applicant renewing a commercial
vessel permit for Gulf reef fish must attest that greater than 50
percent of his/her earned income is derived from commercial fishing
(i.e. harvest and first sale of fish) or charter fishing during either
of the 2 calendar years preceding the application. Applicants must
complete the Income Qualification Affidavit section on the Federal
Permit Application for Vessels Fishing in the EEZ (Federal Permit
Application) as proof of meeting permit income qualification
requirements for commercial Gulf reef fish vessel permits.
This rule proposes to eliminate the income requirement because it
is no longer applicable to current commercial fishing practices. The
income requirement is not compatible with recent regulatory changes in
the Gulf reef fish fishery, such as the implementation of individual
fishing quota (IFQ) programs for red snapper and grouper/tilefish
species, which account for the majority of Gulf reef fish landings.
Regardless of the proportion of a fisherman's income derived from
commercial or charter fishing, participation in these IFQ fisheries is
restricted to those who possess quota shares or who sell annual
allocation. Removing the income requirement will also provide more
flexibility to fishermen and allow them to earn income in other
occupations. This added flexibility would allow some fishermen to renew
their permits even if they did not have the opportunity to earn enough
income from fishing. In addition, this income requirement is relatively
easy to meet or circumvent, and validation of this income requirement
has been difficult. Finally, the elimination of income requirements
would also decrease the administrative burden to NMFS and the applicant
by simplifying the permit renewal process.
Increasing the Maximum Crew Size for Dual-Permitted Vessels
The final rule for Amendment 1 to the FMP (55 FR 2078, January 22,
1990) established the commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish and
the three-person crew size for dual-permitted vessels when fishing
commercially. In 2006, Amendment 18A to the FMP modified the crew size
rule to add the Coast Guard certificate of inspection (COI) provision
that allowed vessels with a COI to carry a minimum crew size specified
by the COI if it was greater than three. Amendment 18A was intended to
resolve conflict between the Council's maximum crew size rule and the
Coast Guard's minimum crew size requirements for vessels with a COI,
which was at least four.
Historically, limiting the crew size on a dual-permitted vessel
when fishing commercially may have served to prevent a vessel from
taking out a number of passengers under the pretense of making a
charter trip, but subsequently selling the catch. Under current
commercial fishing practices, limiting the crew size of a vessel to
prevent selling catch caught on a charter trip is no longer a primary
concern. IFQ programs now regulate commercially harvested red snapper,
grouper, and tilefish species, which constitute the majority of the
commercial reef fish landings. In addition, all commercial Gulf reef
fish vessels are required to be equipped with vessel monitoring
systems. The strict reporting requirements of these management measures
make it clear when a vessel is operating as a commercial vessel. The
amount of IFQ shares owned by a permit holder limits the amount of fish
harvested by a vessel regardless of the crew size. In addition, due to
the costs involved with carrying extra crew, there
[[Page 42253]]
would be little incentive to exceed the necessary crew size.
Currently, 154 vessels possess both a charter vessel/headboat
permit and a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish. These vessel
are considered to be dual-permitted vessels. Unless the vessel has a
COI, dual-permitted vessels are limited to a three-person maximum crew
size. The current crew restriction limits are of particular concern for
vessels conducting commercial spearfishing operations. These activities
would be considered commercial diving operations under the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. The OSHA
regulations for SCUBA diving operations (29 CFR 1910.424(c)) require
that: (1) A standby diver is available while the SCUBA diver is in the
water and (2) the SCUBA diver must be either line-tended or accompanied
by another diver with continuous visual contact. The OSHA regulations
aim to establish safe operating procedures for conducting commercial
SCUBA diving; however, the three-person crew limit for dual-permitted
vessels impairs the crew's ability to comply with OSHA and decreases
the safety at sea, which violates National Standard 10 of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act (16 U.S.C. 1851(a)(10)). Based on OSHA regulations, if two
divers are underwater spearfishing, the third crewmember at the surface
would need to handle the vessel and be the standby diver. If it is
necessary to have two crew members at the surface, only one diver could
be underwater and would need to be line-tended. Spearfishing while
being line-tended could cause additional safety issues.
In addition, the Coast Guard Diving Policies and Procedures Manual
(2009) states that ``[a] minimum of four personnel consisting of a
diving supervisor, diver, diver tender and a standby diver are required
to conduct SCUBA operations.'' While this is not a regulation
applicable to commercial spearfishing vessels, it provides guidance to
increase safety of the diving personnel.
This rule proposes to increase the crew size from three to four for
dual-permitted vessels to improve the safety at sea issues while
commercially spearfishing, which would comply with National Standard 10
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. In addition, it allows commercial
spearfishing vessels to comply with the OSHA diving regulations and the
U.S. Coast Guard guidance for conducting diving operations.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
AA has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with Amendment
34, the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this determination is as follows:
The purpose of this proposed rule is to eliminate existing income
qualification requirements that may no longer be applicable to the
current commercial fishing environment and to improve vessel safety in
the Gulf reef fish fishery. The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the
statutory basis for this proposed rule.
This rule, if implemented, would be expected to directly affect 920
vessels that possess a commercial reef fish permit. Among these
entities, 154 vessels also possess a reef fish for-hire permit. These
vessels would be affected by both actions in this proposed rule. The
average commercial vessel in the reef fish fishery is estimated to earn
approximately $48,000 (2010 dollars).
The for-hire fleet is comprised of charterboats, which charge a fee
on a vessel basis, and headboats, which charge a fee on an individual
angler (head) basis. The average charterboat is estimated to earn
approximately $89,000 (2010 dollars) in annual revenue, while the
average headboat is estimated to earn approximately $469,000 (2010
dollars). The average revenue profile of dual-permitted vessels is not
available.
There have been no other small entities identified that would be
expected to be directly affected by this proposed rule.
The Small Business Administration has established size criteria for
all major industry sectors in the U.S. including fish harvesters. A
business involved in fish harvesting is classified as a small business
if it is independently owned and operated, is not dominant in its field
of operation (including its affiliates), and has combined annual
receipts not in excess of $4.0 million (NAICS code 114111, finfish
fishing) for all its affiliated operations worldwide. The revenue
threshold for a business involved in the for-hire fishing industry is
$7.0 million (NAICS code 713990, recreational industries). Based on the
average revenue estimates provided above, all commercial and for-hire
vessels expected to be directly affected by this proposed rule are
determined for the purpose of this analysis to be small business
entities.
Neither action in this proposed rule would be expected to result in
any reduction in profits for any small entities. The two proposed
actions would either eliminate or lessen a current restriction. The
proposed elimination of an income requirement for the Gulf commercial
reef fish permit is expected to provide the opportunity for fishermen
to increase income from non-fishing occupations without jeopardizing
their ability to renew their commercial reef fish permit. This would
also eliminate the pressure to continue to fish to maintain fishing
income to satisfy a permit requirement when personal, economic, or
other factors may suggest fishing should not occur. Finally, this rule
would reduce the reporting and recordkeeping burdens currently imposed
on applicants. In particular, applicants would no longer be required to
complete the Income Qualification Affidavit section on the Federal
Permit Application for Vessels Fishing in the EEZ (Federal Permit
Application) as proof of meeting permit income qualification
requirements for commercial Gulf reef fish vessel permits. As a result,
although the effects are not quantifiable with available data, this
proposed action would be expected to increase the economic benefits to
small entities.
The proposed increase in the maximum crew size from three to four
persons for dual-permitted vessels would allow increased flexibility
for affected vessels to carry the number of crew best suited to the
needs or conditions of the trip. As a result, although the effects are
again unquantifiable with available data, increased economic benefits
would be expected to accrue to fishermen as a result of this increased
flexibility. Therefore, the economic effects on small entities of this
proposed rule, if implemented, are expected to be positive and not
constitute a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Because this proposed rule, if implemented, would not be expected
to have a significant economic impact on any small entities, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and none has been
prepared.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond
[[Page 42254]]
to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection-of-information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), unless that collection-of-information
displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number.
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to the PRA. NMFS estimates the removal of the income
qualification requirements for commercial Gulf reef fish permit holders
will result in a net decrease in the time to complete the Federal
Permit Application (for all applicants), however, the current burden
estimate (20 minutes per applicant) to complete the application form
would not decrease because the time to complete the Income
Qualification Affidavit is minimal compared to the time to complete the
entire application.
These requirements have been submitted to OMB for approval. NMFS
seeks public comment regarding: Whether this proposed collection-of-
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
ways to minimize the burden of the collection-of-information, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or
any other aspect of the collection-of-information requirement,
including suggestions for reducing the burden, to NMFS and to OMB (see
ADDRESSES).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: July 13, 2012.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, performing the
functions and duties of the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 622.2, the definition for ``charter vessel'' is revised
to read as follows:
Sec. 622.2 Definitions and acronyms.
* * * * *
Charter vessel means a vessel less than 100 gross tons (90.8 mt)
that is subject to the requirements of the USCG to carry six or fewer
passengers for hire and that engages in charter fishing at any time
during the calendar year. A charter vessel with a commercial permit, as
required under Sec. 622.4(a)(2), is considered to be operating as a
charter vessel when it carries a passenger who pays a fee or when there
are more than three persons aboard, including operator and crew, except
for a charter vessel with a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish. A charter vessel that has a charter vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish and a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish is considered to
be operating as a charter vessel when it carries a passenger who pays a
fee or when there are more than four persons aboard, including operator
and crew. A charter vessel that has a charter vessel permit for Gulf
reef fish, a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish, and a valid
Certificate of Inspection (COI) issued by the USCG to carry passengers
for hire will not be considered to be operating as a charter vessel
provided--
(1) It is not carrying a passenger who pays a fee; and
(2) When underway for more than 12 hours, that vessel meets, but
does not exceed the minimum manning requirements outlined in its COI
for vessels underway over 12 hours; or when underway for not more than
12 hours, that vessel meets the minimum manning requirements outlined
in its COI for vessels underway for not more than 12 hours (if any),
and does not exceed the minimum manning requirements outlined in its
COI for vessels that are underway for more than 12 hours.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 622.4, paragraphs (m)(3), (m)(4), and (m)(5) are
removed; paragraph (m)(6) is redesignated as paragraph (m)(3); and
paragraphs (a)(2)(v) and (m)(2) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 622.4 Permits and fees.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(v) Gulf reef fish. For a person aboard a vessel to be eligible for
exemption from the bag limits, to fish under a quota, as specified in
Sec. 622.42(a)(1), or to sell Gulf reef fish in or from the Gulf EEZ,
a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish must have been issued to
the vessel and must be on board. If Federal regulations for Gulf reef
fish in subparts A, B, or C of this part are more restrictive than
state regulations, a person aboard a vessel for which a commercial
vessel permit for Gulf reef fish has been issued must comply with such
Federal regulations regardless of where the fish are harvested. See
paragraph (a)(2)(ix) of this section regarding an IFQ vessel account
required to fish for, possess, or land Gulf red snapper or Gulf
groupers and tilefishes and paragraph (a)(2)(xiv) of this section
regarding an additional bottom longline endorsement required to fish
for Gulf reef fish with bottom longline gear in a portion of the
eastern Gulf. See paragraph (m) of this section regarding a limited
access system for commercial vessel permits for Gulf reef fish.
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(2) A permit holder may transfer the commercial vessel permit for
Gulf reef fish to another vessel owned by the same entity. A permit
holder may also transfer the commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish to the owner of another vessel or to a new vessel owner when he or
she transfers ownership of the permitted vessel.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-17495 Filed 7-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P