Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Export-Import Bank of the United States Office of Inspector General-EIB-35-Office of Inspector General Investigative Records, 41885-41886 [2012-17382]

Download as PDF 41885 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 77, No. 137 Tuesday, July 17, 2012 The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Commodity Credit Corporation 7 CFR Part 1485 Market Access Program Foreign Agricultural Service and Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA. ACTION: Correcting amendments. AGENCY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture published a final rule in the Federal Register on May 17, 2012 (77 FR 29474). This document corrects the final regulations by revising these sections. SUMMARY: Effective date: July 17, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Slupek, 202–720–1169, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, Office of Trade Programs, Program Operations Division; or by phone: (202) 720–4327; or by fax: (202) 720–9361; or by email: podadmin@fas.usda.gov. DATES: As published, the final regulation contained an error which may prove to be misleading and need to be clarified. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1485 Agricultural commodities, Exports. Accordingly, 7 CFR Part 1485 is corrected by making the following correcting amendment: ■ 2. Revise the part heading for part 1485 to read as set forth above. EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES 3. Revise paragraph (b) of § 1485.19 to read as follows: 12 CFR Part 404 § 1485.19 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. [EXIM–OIG–2012–0010] ■ Advances. * * * * * (b) Exception. A MAP Participant for generic promotion activities may request an advance of MAP funds from CCC, provided the MAP Participant meets the criteria for advance payments set forth in the applicable parts of this title (e.g., 7 CFR Parts 3015, 3016, and 3019). CCC will not approve any request for an advance submitted later than 3 months after the end of a MAP Participant’s program year. At any given time, total payments advanced shall not exceed 40 percent of a MAP Participant’s approved generic activity budget for the program year. CCC will not advance funds to a MAP Participant for brand promotion activities. When approving a request for an advance, CCC may require the MAP Participant to carry adequate fidelity bond coverage when the absence of such coverage is considered to create an unacceptable risk to the interests of the MAP. Whether an ‘‘unacceptable risk’’ exists in a particular situation will depend on a number of factors, such as, for example, the Participant’s history of performance in MAP; the Participant’s perceived financial stability and resources; and any other factors presented in the particular situation that may reflect on the Participant’s responsibility or the riskiness of its activities. * * * * * Dated: June 7, 2012. Suzanne E. Heinen, Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service, and Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES [FR Doc. 2012–15195 Filed 7–16–12; 8:45 am] PART 1485—GRANT AGREEMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FOREIGN MARKETS FOR U.S. AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES BILLING CODE 3410–10–P 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1485 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 5623, 5662–5663 and sec. 203, 402–403, Pub. L. 95–501, as amended, 92 Stat 1685 and sec. 1302, Pub. L. 103–66, 107 Stat. 330. VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:47 Jul 16, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 RIN 3048–AA02 Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Export-Import Bank of the United States Office of Inspector General—EIB–35—Office of Inspector General Investigative Records Office of the Inspector General, Export-Import Bank of the United States. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (hereafter known as ‘‘Ex-Im Bank’’) is issuing a final rule to exempt portions of a system of records entitled ‘‘EIB–35—Office of Inspector General Investigative Records’’ from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements. SUMMARY: The final rule is effective August 16, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Osvaldo Gratacos, Ex-Im Bank, Office of Inspector General, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Rm. 976, Washington, DC 20571 or by telephone (202) 565–3908 or facsimile (202) 565–3988. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: Background The Ex-Im Bank published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register, 77 FR 27140 (May 9, 2012), proposing to exempt portions of a system of records entitled ‘‘EIB–35— Office of Inspector General Investigative Records’’ and held by the Ex-Im Bank Office of Inspector General (OIG), from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a. The exemptions are necessary in order for Ex-Im Bank OIG to carry out its investigative responsibilities pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended. The Ex-Im Bank OIG published the system of records notice in the Federal Register, 77 FR 26755 (May 7, 2012), and comments were invited on both the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and the System of Records Notice (SORN). E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM 17JYR1 41886 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations Public Comments Ex-Im Bank did not receive any comments on the SORN or the NPRM. Ex-Im Bank will implement the rulemaking as proposed. List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 404 Information disclosure. For the reasons stated in the preamble, Ex-Im Bank amends chapter IV of Title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: PART 404—INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 1. The authority citation for part 404 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552 and 552a. Section 404.7 also issued under E.O. 12600, 52 FR 23781, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 235. Section 404.21 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a note. Subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C. 301, 12 U.S.C. 635. 2. Add § 404.24 to Subpart B to read as follows: ■ sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES § 404.24 Exemptions: EIB–35—Office of Inspector General Investigative Records. (a) Criminal Law Enforcement—(1) Exemption. Under the authority granted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), Ex-Im Bank hereby exempts the system of records entitled ‘‘EIB–35—Office of Inspector General Investigative Records’’ from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1) through (3), (e)(4)(G) and (H), (e)(5), (e)(8), (f), and (g) because the system contains information pertaining to the enforcement of criminal laws. ‘‘EIB–35—Office of Inspector General Investigative Records’’ is maintained by the Ex-Im Bank Office of Inspector General (‘‘OIG’’ or ‘‘Ex-Im Bank OIG.’’) (2) Reasons for exemption. The reasons for asserting this exemption are: (i) Disclosure to the individual named in the record pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4), or (d)(1) through (4) could seriously impede or compromise the investigation by alerting the target(s), subjecting a potential witness or witnesses to intimidation or improper influence, and leading to destruction of evidence. Disclosure could enable suspects to take action to prevent detection of criminal activities, conceal evidence, or escape prosecution. (ii) Application of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) is impractical because the relevance of specific information might be established only after considerable analysis and as the investigation progresses. Effective law enforcement requires the OIG to keep information that may not be relevant to a specific OIG investigation, but which may provide leads for appropriate law VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:47 Jul 16, 2012 Jkt 226001 enforcement and to establish patterns of activity that might relate to the jurisdiction of the OIG and/or other agencies. (iii) Application of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(2) would be counterproductive to the performance of a criminal investigation because it would alert the individual to the existence of an investigation. In any investigation, it is necessary to obtain evidence from a variety of sources other than the subject of the investigation in order to verify the evidence necessary for successful litigation or prosecution. (iv) Application of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3) could discourage the free flow of information in a criminal law enforcement inquiry. (v) The requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(G) and (H) and (f) would be counterproductive to the performance of a criminal investigation. To notify an individual at the individual’s request of the existence of records in an investigative file pertaining to such individual, or to grant access to an investigative file could interfere with investigative and enforcement proceedings, deprive co-defendants of a right to a fair trial or other impartial adjudication, constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy of others, disclose the identity or confidential sources, reveal confidential information supplied by these sources and disclose investigative techniques and procedures. Nevertheless, Ex-Im Bank OIG has published notice of its notification, access, and contest procedures because access may be appropriate in some cases. (vi) Although the OIG endeavors to maintain accurate records, application of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(5) is impractical because maintaining only those records that are accurate, relevant, timely, and complete and that assure fairness in determination is contrary to established investigative techniques. Information that may initially appear inaccurate, irrelevant, untimely, or incomplete may, when collated and analyzed with other available information, become more pertinent as an investigation progresses. (vii) Application of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(8) could prematurely reveal an ongoing criminal investigation to the subject of the investigation. (viii) The provisions of subsection (g) do not apply to this system if an exemption otherwise applies. (b) Other Law Enforcement—(1) Exemption. Under the authority granted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), Ex-Im Bank hereby exempts the system of records entitled ‘‘EIB–35—Office of Inspector General Investigative Records’’ from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 (f) for the same reasons as stated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, that is, because the system contains investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes other than material within the scope of subsection 552a(j)(2). (2) Reasons for exemption. The reasons for asserting this exemption are because the disclosure and other requirements of the Privacy Act could substantially compromise the efficacy and integrity of OIG operations. Disclosure could invade the privacy of other individuals and disclose their identity when they were expressly promised confidentiality. Disclosure could interfere with the integrity of information which would otherwise be subject to privileges (see, e.g., 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5)), and which could interfere with other important law enforcement concerns (see, e.g., 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7)). (c) Federal Civilian or Contract Employment—(1) Exemption. Under the authority granted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), Ex-Im Bank hereby exempts the system of records entitled ‘‘EIB–35—Office of Inspector General Investigative Records’’ from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f) because the system contains investigatory material compiled for the purpose of determining eligibility or qualifications for federal civilian or contract employment. (2) Reasons for exemption. The reasons for asserting this exemption are the same as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. Sharon A. Whitt, Agency Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2012–17382 Filed 7–16–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6690–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2012–0266; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–061–AD; Amendment 39–17119; AD 2012–14–05] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A318, A319, and A320 series airplanes. This AD was prompted SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM 17JYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 17, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41885-41886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17382]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

12 CFR Part 404

[EXIM-OIG-2012-0010]
RIN 3048-AA02


Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Export-Import 
Bank of the United States Office of Inspector General--EIB-35--Office 
of Inspector General Investigative Records

AGENCY: Office of the Inspector General, Export-Import Bank of the 
United States.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (hereafter known 
as ``Ex-Im Bank'') is issuing a final rule to exempt portions of a 
system of records entitled ``EIB-35--Office of Inspector General 
Investigative Records'' from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act 
because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement 
requirements.

DATES: The final rule is effective August 16, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Osvaldo Gratacos, Ex-Im Bank, Office 
of Inspector General, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Rm. 976, Washington, DC 
20571 or by telephone (202) 565-3908 or facsimile (202) 565-3988.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The Ex-Im Bank published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the 
Federal Register, 77 FR 27140 (May 9, 2012), proposing to exempt 
portions of a system of records entitled ``EIB-35--Office of Inspector 
General Investigative Records'' and held by the Ex-Im Bank Office of 
Inspector General (OIG), from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act 
of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a. The exemptions are necessary in order for Ex-Im 
Bank OIG to carry out its investigative responsibilities pursuant to 
the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended. The Ex-Im Bank OIG 
published the system of records notice in the Federal Register, 77 FR 
26755 (May 7, 2012), and comments were invited on both the Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and the System of Records Notice (SORN).

[[Page 41886]]

Public Comments

    Ex-Im Bank did not receive any comments on the SORN or the NPRM. 
Ex-Im Bank will implement the rulemaking as proposed.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 404

    Information disclosure.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, Ex-Im Bank amends chapter 
IV of Title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:

PART 404--INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

0
1. The authority citation for part 404 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 552 and 552a. Section 404.7 also issued 
under E.O. 12600, 52 FR 23781, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 235. Section 
404.21 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a note. Subpart C also issued 
under 5 U.S.C. 301, 12 U.S.C. 635.

0
2. Add Sec.  404.24 to Subpart B to read as follows:


Sec.  404.24  Exemptions: EIB-35--Office of Inspector General 
Investigative Records.

    (a) Criminal Law Enforcement--(1) Exemption. Under the authority 
granted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), Ex-Im Bank hereby exempts the system of 
records entitled ``EIB-35--Office of Inspector General Investigative 
Records'' from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4), (d)(1) 
through (4), (e)(1) through (3), (e)(4)(G) and (H), (e)(5), (e)(8), 
(f), and (g) because the system contains information pertaining to the 
enforcement of criminal laws. ``EIB-35--Office of Inspector General 
Investigative Records'' is maintained by the Ex-Im Bank Office of 
Inspector General (``OIG'' or ``Ex-Im Bank OIG.'')
    (2) Reasons for exemption. The reasons for asserting this exemption 
are:
    (i) Disclosure to the individual named in the record pursuant to 5 
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4), or (d)(1) through (4) could seriously impede 
or compromise the investigation by alerting the target(s), subjecting a 
potential witness or witnesses to intimidation or improper influence, 
and leading to destruction of evidence. Disclosure could enable 
suspects to take action to prevent detection of criminal activities, 
conceal evidence, or escape prosecution.
    (ii) Application of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) is impractical because the 
relevance of specific information might be established only after 
considerable analysis and as the investigation progresses. Effective 
law enforcement requires the OIG to keep information that may not be 
relevant to a specific OIG investigation, but which may provide leads 
for appropriate law enforcement and to establish patterns of activity 
that might relate to the jurisdiction of the OIG and/or other agencies.
    (iii) Application of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(2) would be counterproductive 
to the performance of a criminal investigation because it would alert 
the individual to the existence of an investigation. In any 
investigation, it is necessary to obtain evidence from a variety of 
sources other than the subject of the investigation in order to verify 
the evidence necessary for successful litigation or prosecution.
    (iv) Application of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3) could discourage the free 
flow of information in a criminal law enforcement inquiry.
    (v) The requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(G) and (H) and (f) 
would be counterproductive to the performance of a criminal 
investigation. To notify an individual at the individual's request of 
the existence of records in an investigative file pertaining to such 
individual, or to grant access to an investigative file could interfere 
with investigative and enforcement proceedings, deprive co-defendants 
of a right to a fair trial or other impartial adjudication, constitute 
an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy of others, disclose the 
identity or confidential sources, reveal confidential information 
supplied by these sources and disclose investigative techniques and 
procedures. Nevertheless, Ex-Im Bank OIG has published notice of its 
notification, access, and contest procedures because access may be 
appropriate in some cases.
    (vi) Although the OIG endeavors to maintain accurate records, 
application of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(5) is impractical because maintaining 
only those records that are accurate, relevant, timely, and complete 
and that assure fairness in determination is contrary to established 
investigative techniques. Information that may initially appear 
inaccurate, irrelevant, untimely, or incomplete may, when collated and 
analyzed with other available information, become more pertinent as an 
investigation progresses.
    (vii) Application of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(8) could prematurely reveal 
an ongoing criminal investigation to the subject of the investigation.
    (viii) The provisions of subsection (g) do not apply to this system 
if an exemption otherwise applies.
    (b) Other Law Enforcement--(1) Exemption. Under the authority 
granted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), Ex-Im Bank hereby exempts the system of 
records entitled ``EIB-35--Office of Inspector General Investigative 
Records'' from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through 
(4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f) for the same reasons as stated 
in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, that is, because the system 
contains investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes 
other than material within the scope of subsection 552a(j)(2).
    (2) Reasons for exemption. The reasons for asserting this exemption 
are because the disclosure and other requirements of the Privacy Act 
could substantially compromise the efficacy and integrity of OIG 
operations. Disclosure could invade the privacy of other individuals 
and disclose their identity when they were expressly promised 
confidentiality. Disclosure could interfere with the integrity of 
information which would otherwise be subject to privileges (see, e.g., 
5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5)), and which could interfere with other important law 
enforcement concerns (see, e.g., 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7)).
    (c) Federal Civilian or Contract Employment--(1) Exemption. Under 
the authority granted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), Ex-Im Bank hereby exempts 
the system of records entitled ``EIB-35--Office of Inspector General 
Investigative Records'' from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), 
(d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f) because the 
system contains investigatory material compiled for the purpose of 
determining eligibility or qualifications for federal civilian or 
contract employment.
    (2) Reasons for exemption. The reasons for asserting this exemption 
are the same as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-17382 Filed 7-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.