Representative Edward J. Markey; Filing of Food Additive Petition, 41953-41954 [2012-17367]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 17, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Dated: July 10, 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vanee Komolprasert, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–
275), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park,
MD 20740–3835, 240–402–1217.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2012–17284 Filed 7–16–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 175
[Docket No. FDA–2012–F–0728]
Representative Edward J. Markey;
Filing of Food Additive Petition
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of petition.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that Representative Edward J. Markey
has filed a petition proposing that the
food additive regulations be amended to
no longer provide for the use of
Bisphenol A (BPA)-based epoxy resins
as coatings in packaging for infant
formula because these uses have been
abandoned. FDA expressly requests
comments on the petitioner’s request.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments by September 17,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2012–F–
0728 by any of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and
Docket No. FDA–2012–F–0728. All
comments received may be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Jul 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
I. Background
Under section 409(b)(5) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5)), notice
is given that a food additive petition
(FAP 2B4791) has been filed by
Representative Edward J. Markey, House
of Representatives, 2108 Rayburn House
Office Building, Washington, DC 20515–
2107. The petition proposes to amend
the food additive regulations in
§ 175.300 (21 CFR 175.300) to no longer
provide for the use of BPA-based epoxy
resins as coatings in packaging for infant
formula because these uses have been
intentionally and permanently
abandoned. BPA-based epoxy resins are
formed by the reaction of 4,4’isopropylenediphenol (i.e., BPA), and
epichlorohydrin.
II. Abandonment
Under section 409(i) of the FD&C Act,
FDA ‘‘shall by regulation prescribe the
procedure by which regulations under
the foregoing provisions of this section
may be amended or repealed, and such
procedure shall conform to the
procedure provided in this section for
the promulgation of such regulations.’’
FDA’s regulations specific to
administrative actions for food additives
provide as follows: ‘‘The Commissioner,
on his own initiative or on the petition
of any interested person, pursuant to
part 10 of this chapter, may propose the
issuance of a regulation amending or
repealing a regulation pertaining to a
food additive or granting or repealing an
exception for such additive.’’
(§ 171.130(a) (21 CFR 171.130(a))).
These regulations further provide: ‘‘Any
such petition shall include an assertion
of facts, supported by data, showing that
new information exists with respect to
the food additive or that new uses have
been developed or old uses abandoned,
that new data are available as to toxicity
of the chemical, or that experience with
the existing regulation or exemption
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41953
may justify its amendment or appeal.
New data shall be furnished in the form
specified in §§ 171.1 and 171.100 for
submitting petitions.’’ (§ 171.130(b)).
Under these regulations, a petitioner
may propose that FDA amend a food
additive regulation if the petitioner can
demonstrate that there are ‘‘old uses
abandoned’’ for the relevant food
additive. Such abandonment must be
complete for any intended uses in the
U.S. market. While section 409 of the
FD&C Act and § 171.130 also provide for
amending or revoking a food additive
regulation based on safety, an
amendment or revocation based on
abandonment is not based on safety, but
is based on the fact that the regulatory
authorization is no longer necessary
because the use of the food additive has
been abandoned.
Abandonment may be based on the
abandonment of certain authorized food
additive uses for a substance (e.g., if a
substance is no longer used in certain
product categories), or on the
abandonment of all authorized food
additive uses of a substance (e.g., if a
substance is no longer being
manufactured). If a petition seeks an
amendment to a food additive
regulation based on the abandonment of
certain uses of the food additive, such
uses must be adequately defined so that
both the scope of the abandonment and
any amendment to the food additive
regulation are clear.
The petition submitted by
Representative Markey contains public
information and information collected
from a survey of the U.S. registered
manufacturers of infant formula to
support the petitioner’s claim that all
U.S. infant formula manufacturers have
abandoned the use of BPA-based epoxy
resins as coatings in all food contact
packaging for infant formula. According
to the petition, these companies
accounted for 100% of the current
infant formula market in the United
States.
FDA expressly requests comments on
the petitioner’s request that FDA amend
the food additive regulations to no
longer permit the use of BPA-based
epoxy resins as coatings in packaging
for infant formula. For the purposes of
this petition, FDA considers the use of
BPA-based epoxy resins as coatings (as
described in § 175.300(a)) in packaging
of infant formula to mean a metal
substrate (single use) or any suitable
substrate (repeated use) being coated
with BPA-based epoxy resins as a
continuous film or enamel, serving as a
functional barrier between the infant
formula (powder or liquid) and the
substrate. As noted, the basis for the
proposed amendment is that the use of
E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM
17JYP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
41954
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 17, 2012 / Proposed Rules
BPA-based epoxy resins as coatings in
packaging for infant formula has been
permanently and completely
abandoned. Accordingly, FDA requests
comments that address whether these
uses of BPA-based epoxy resins have
been completely abandoned, such as
information on whether infant formula
packaging containing BPA-based epoxy
resins as coatings is currently being
introduced or delivered for introduction
into the U.S. market. Further, FDA
requests comments on whether the uses
that are the subject of the petition (BPAbased epoxy resins as coatings in infant
formula packaging) have been
adequately defined. FDA is not aware of
information that suggests continued use
of BPA-based epoxy resins as coatings
in packaging for powder or liquid infant
formula. FDA is providing the public 60
days to submit comments. FDA
anticipates that some interested persons
may wish to provide FDA with certain
information that they consider to be
trade secret or confidential commercial
information (CCI) that would be exempt
under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
Interested persons may claim
information that is submitted to FDA as
CCI or trade secret by clearly marking
both the document and the specific
information as ‘‘confidential.’’
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552) and FDA’s disclosure regulations
(21 CFR part 20). For electronic
submissions to https://
www.regulations.gov, indicate in the
‘‘comments’’ box of the appropriate
docket that your submission contains
confidential information. Interested
persons must also submit a copy of the
comment that does not contain the
information claimed as confidential for
inclusion in the public version of the
official record. Information not marked
confidential will be included in the
public version of the official record
without prior notice.
FDA is not requesting comments on
the safety of these uses of BPA-based
epoxy resins as coatings because, as
discussed previously, such information
is not relevant to establishing
abandonment as the basis of the
proposed action. Any comments
addressing the safety of BPA-based
epoxy resins or containing safety
information on these resins will not be
considered in FDA’s evaluation of this
petition. Separate from FDA’s
consideration of this petition, FDA is
actively assessing the safety of BPA (see
75 FR 17145, April 5, 2010; see also
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Jul 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/
PublicHealthFocus/ucm064437.htm).
FDA has determined under 21 CFR
25.32(m) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
written comments regarding this
document to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) or
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. It is only
necessary to send one set of comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: July 12, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–17367 Filed 7–16–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0406; FRL–9699–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a request submitted by the Indiana
Department of Environmental
Management on May 14, 2012, to revise
the Indiana State Implementation Plan
(SIP). The submission revises the
Indiana Administrative Code (IAC)
definition of ‘‘References to the Code of
Federal Regulations,’’ from the 2009
edition to the 2011 edition.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 16, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2012–0406 by one of the following
methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief,
Control Strategies Section (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
Chief, Control Strategies Section (AR–
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Regional
Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031,
hatten.charles@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule, and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. For additional information,
see the direct final rule which is located
in the Rules section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: June 27, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2012–17263 Filed 7–16–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM
17JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 17, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41953-41954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17367]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 175
[Docket No. FDA-2012-F-0728]
Representative Edward J. Markey; Filing of Food Additive Petition
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that
Representative Edward J. Markey has filed a petition proposing that the
food additive regulations be amended to no longer provide for the use
of Bisphenol A (BPA)-based epoxy resins as coatings in packaging for
infant formula because these uses have been abandoned. FDA expressly
requests comments on the petitioner's request.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments by September 17,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2012-
F-0728 by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper or CD-ROM
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name
and Docket No. FDA-2012-F-0728. All comments received may be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. For additional information on submitting
comments, see the ``Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanee Komolprasert, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-275), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 240-402-1217.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under section 409(b)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5)), notice is given that a food
additive petition (FAP 2B4791) has been filed by Representative Edward
J. Markey, House of Representatives, 2108 Rayburn House Office
Building, Washington, DC 20515-2107. The petition proposes to amend the
food additive regulations in Sec. 175.300 (21 CFR 175.300) to no
longer provide for the use of BPA-based epoxy resins as coatings in
packaging for infant formula because these uses have been intentionally
and permanently abandoned. BPA-based epoxy resins are formed by the
reaction of 4,4'-isopropylenediphenol (i.e., BPA), and epichlorohydrin.
II. Abandonment
Under section 409(i) of the FD&C Act, FDA ``shall by regulation
prescribe the procedure by which regulations under the foregoing
provisions of this section may be amended or repealed, and such
procedure shall conform to the procedure provided in this section for
the promulgation of such regulations.'' FDA's regulations specific to
administrative actions for food additives provide as follows: ``The
Commissioner, on his own initiative or on the petition of any
interested person, pursuant to part 10 of this chapter, may propose the
issuance of a regulation amending or repealing a regulation pertaining
to a food additive or granting or repealing an exception for such
additive.'' (Sec. 171.130(a) (21 CFR 171.130(a))). These regulations
further provide: ``Any such petition shall include an assertion of
facts, supported by data, showing that new information exists with
respect to the food additive or that new uses have been developed or
old uses abandoned, that new data are available as to toxicity of the
chemical, or that experience with the existing regulation or exemption
may justify its amendment or appeal. New data shall be furnished in the
form specified in Sec. Sec. 171.1 and 171.100 for submitting
petitions.'' (Sec. 171.130(b)). Under these regulations, a petitioner
may propose that FDA amend a food additive regulation if the petitioner
can demonstrate that there are ``old uses abandoned'' for the relevant
food additive. Such abandonment must be complete for any intended uses
in the U.S. market. While section 409 of the FD&C Act and Sec. 171.130
also provide for amending or revoking a food additive regulation based
on safety, an amendment or revocation based on abandonment is not based
on safety, but is based on the fact that the regulatory authorization
is no longer necessary because the use of the food additive has been
abandoned.
Abandonment may be based on the abandonment of certain authorized
food additive uses for a substance (e.g., if a substance is no longer
used in certain product categories), or on the abandonment of all
authorized food additive uses of a substance (e.g., if a substance is
no longer being manufactured). If a petition seeks an amendment to a
food additive regulation based on the abandonment of certain uses of
the food additive, such uses must be adequately defined so that both
the scope of the abandonment and any amendment to the food additive
regulation are clear.
The petition submitted by Representative Markey contains public
information and information collected from a survey of the U.S.
registered manufacturers of infant formula to support the petitioner's
claim that all U.S. infant formula manufacturers have abandoned the use
of BPA-based epoxy resins as coatings in all food contact packaging for
infant formula. According to the petition, these companies accounted
for 100% of the current infant formula market in the United States.
FDA expressly requests comments on the petitioner's request that
FDA amend the food additive regulations to no longer permit the use of
BPA-based epoxy resins as coatings in packaging for infant formula. For
the purposes of this petition, FDA considers the use of BPA-based epoxy
resins as coatings (as described in Sec. 175.300(a)) in packaging of
infant formula to mean a metal substrate (single use) or any suitable
substrate (repeated use) being coated with BPA-based epoxy resins as a
continuous film or enamel, serving as a functional barrier between the
infant formula (powder or liquid) and the substrate. As noted, the
basis for the proposed amendment is that the use of
[[Page 41954]]
BPA-based epoxy resins as coatings in packaging for infant formula has
been permanently and completely abandoned. Accordingly, FDA requests
comments that address whether these uses of BPA-based epoxy resins have
been completely abandoned, such as information on whether infant
formula packaging containing BPA-based epoxy resins as coatings is
currently being introduced or delivered for introduction into the U.S.
market. Further, FDA requests comments on whether the uses that are the
subject of the petition (BPA-based epoxy resins as coatings in infant
formula packaging) have been adequately defined. FDA is not aware of
information that suggests continued use of BPA-based epoxy resins as
coatings in packaging for powder or liquid infant formula. FDA is
providing the public 60 days to submit comments. FDA anticipates that
some interested persons may wish to provide FDA with certain
information that they consider to be trade secret or confidential
commercial information (CCI) that would be exempt under Exemption 4 of
the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). Interested persons may
claim information that is submitted to FDA as CCI or trade secret by
clearly marking both the document and the specific information as
``confidential.'' Information so marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and FDA's
disclosure regulations (21 CFR part 20). For electronic submissions to
https://www.regulations.gov, indicate in the ``comments'' box of the
appropriate docket that your submission contains confidential
information. Interested persons must also submit a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information claimed as confidential for
inclusion in the public version of the official record. Information not
marked confidential will be included in the public version of the
official record without prior notice.
FDA is not requesting comments on the safety of these uses of BPA-
based epoxy resins as coatings because, as discussed previously, such
information is not relevant to establishing abandonment as the basis of
the proposed action. Any comments addressing the safety of BPA-based
epoxy resins or containing safety information on these resins will not
be considered in FDA's evaluation of this petition. Separate from FDA's
consideration of this petition, FDA is actively assessing the safety of
BPA (see 75 FR 17145, April 5, 2010; see also https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/PublicHealthFocus/ucm064437.htm).
FDA has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(m) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either written comments regarding
this document to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) or
electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. It is only necessary
to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: July 12, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-17367 Filed 7-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P