Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Helicopters, 41889-41891 [2012-16944]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(m) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency Airworthiness Directive 2011–0015,
dated January 31, 2011, and the service
information specified in paragraphs (m)(1)
through (m)(5) of this AD, for related
information.
(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–28–1118,
Revision 03, including Appendix 1, dated
May 12, 2009.
(2) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–28–1132,
Revision 04, including Appendices 1 and 2,
dated February 1, 2010.
(3) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–28–1145,
Revision 01, including Appendix 01, dated
April 27, 2007.
(4) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–28–1154,
Revision 01, dated April 7, 2008.
(5) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A320–53–1227, Revision 05, dated March 27,
2012.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the Incorporation by Reference
(IBR) of the following service information
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use the following service
information to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A320–53–1227, Revision 05, dated March 27,
2012.
(ii) Reserved
(3) If you accomplish the optional actions
specified by this AD, you must use the
following service information to perform
those actions, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–28–1118,
Revision 03, including Appendix 1, dated
May 12, 2009.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–28–1132,
Revision 04, including Appendices 1 and 2,
dated February 1, 2010.
(iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–28–
1145, Revision 01, including Appendix 01,
dated April 27, 2007.
(iv) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–28–
1154, Revision 01, dated April 7, 2008.
(4) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet
https://www.airbus.com.
(5) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(6) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:47 Jul 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call 202–741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 29,
2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–16885 Filed 7–16–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0715; Directorate
Identifier 2012–SW–039–AD; Amendment
39–17122; AD 2012–14–08]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky)
Model S–92A helicopters. This AD
requires inspecting the main gearbox
(MGB) for a crack. This AD is prompted
by a crack in the cored passage of the
MGB housing, which may be indicated
by oil on the housing. These actions are
intended to detect a crack in the MGB
housing, which could result in loss of
oil, failure of the MGB, and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 1, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain documents listed in this AD
as of August 1, 2012.
We must receive comments on this
AD by September 17, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41889
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
Docket Operations Office between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations Office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation, Attn: Manager,
Commercial Technical Support,
mailstop s581a, 6900 Main Street,
Stratford, CT 06614; telephone (800)
562–4409; email address
tsslibrary@sikorsky.com; or at https://
www.sikorsky.com. You may review a
copy of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort
Worth, Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Schwetz, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Boston Aircraft Certification
Office, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
FAA, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; telephone (718)
238–7761; email
michael.schwetz@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not provide you with notice and
an opportunity to provide your
comments prior to it becoming effective.
However, we invite you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that resulted from
adopting this AD. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the AD, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time. We will file
in the docket all comments that we
receive, as well as a report summarizing
each substantive public contact with
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
41890
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
FAA personnel concerning this
rulemaking during the comment period.
We will consider all the comments we
receive and may conduct additional
rulemaking based on those comments.
Discussion
This AD is prompted by an incident
in which a crack in the MGB housing,
in the cored passage area adjacent to the
scissor bracket mount, allowed a
measurable amount of oil to leak from
the MGB. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in loss of oil,
failure of the MGB and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
FAA’s Determination
We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other helicopters of the same
type design.
Related Service Information
Sikorsky has developed inspection
procedures and issued Sikorsky S–92
Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. ASB
92–63–032 Basic Issue, dated December
22, 2011 (ASB 92–63–032), to detect a
crack in the MGB by inspecting the area
of the MGB housing, as indicated in
Figure 1 of ASB 92–63–032, for the
presence of oil. We reviewed ASB
92–63–032, which describes procedures
to inspect the MGB for indications of oil
leakage. If indications of oil leakage are
found, ASB 92–63–032 specifies
cleaning the inspection area, performing
a ground run and confirming the source
of the leakage by using a specified
ultraviolet light and repeating the visual
inspection using a 10X magnifying
glass. If any oil leakage is found, the
ASB 92–63–032 states that the MGB is
not to be used for further flight until
direction is provided by Sikorsky. ASB
92–63–032 also requires a recurrent
inspection for any oil leakage, and
references Sikorsky Maintenance
Manual Temporary Revision No. 63–50,
(TR 63–50), and Temporary Revision
No. 5–104 (TR 5–104), both dated
December 22, 2011. TR 63–50 adds the
MGB inspection procedures to the
aircraft maintenance manual, and TR
5–104 adds the MGB inspection
requirement to the ‘‘Before First Flight
of the Day Checklist.’’ TR 5–104 also
specifies inspecting the MGB before the
first flight of the day, not to exceed 10
flight hours between inspections.
Since issuing ASB 92–63–032,
Sikorsky has issued S–92 ASB No. ASB
92–63–034 Basic Issue, dated March 8,
2012 (ASB 92–63–034), which describes
procedures to detect cracks in the MGB
main module assembly with a one-time
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:47 Jul 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
eddy-current and fluorescent-penetrant
inspection. ASB 92–63–034 also states
that upon compliance with the eddycurrent inspection ‘‘the daily visual
inspection implemented by ASB 92–63–
032 is waived.’’
AD Requirements
This AD requires repetitively
inspecting the main gearbox with a 10X
magnifying glass for a crack. If there is
a crack, or if any oil leakage is detected,
this AD requires replacing the MGB
with an airworthy MGB. This AD also
provides for a one-time eddy-current
inspection of the main module assembly
of the MGB as an optional terminating
action.
Differences Between This AD and the
Service Information
The ASB requires inspecting for any
oil leakage, while this AD requires
inspecting for a crack, which may be
indicated by the presence of oil leakage.
The ASB requires sending photographic
documentation of any oil leakage to
Sikorsky; this AD does not. The ASB
also requires contacting Sikorsky for
further direction if any oil leakage is
confirmed; this AD requires replacing
any affected MGB with an airworthy
MGB.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
16 helicopters of U.S. Registry. We
estimate that operators may incur the
following costs, at an average labor rate
of $85 per hour, in order to comply with
this AD. Inspecting the MGB will
require one work hour for a total cost to
the operator of $85 and a cost to the
entire U.S. fleet of $1,360 per inspection
cycle. Performing the eddy-current
inspection of the MGB will require 2
work hours for a total cost to the
operator of $170 and a cost to the entire
U.S. fleet of $2,720. If cracked, we
estimate replacing a MGB will require
112 work hours and required parts will
cost $260,000, for a total cost to the
operator of $269,520.
FAA’s Justification and Determination
of the Effective Date
Providing an opportunity for public
comments prior to adopting these AD
requirements would delay
implementing the safety actions needed
to correct this known unsafe condition.
Therefore, we find that the risk to the
flying public justifies waiving notice
and comment prior to the adoption of
this rule because the required corrective
actions must be accomplished within 10
hours time-in-service, and repeated on a
daily basis. These helicopters are
primarily used in the offshore industry,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and this is a very short compliance time
for this industry.
Since an unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD, we determined that notice and
opportunity for public comment before
issuing this AD are impracticable and
that good cause exists for making this
amendment effective in less than 30
days.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by Reference,
Safety.
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2012–14–08 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation:
Amendment 39–17122; Docket No.
FAA–2012–0715; Directorate Identifier
2012–SW–039–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Model S–92A
helicopters, serial numbers 920006 through
920155, certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a
crack in the main gearbox (MGB) housing
cored oil passage. This condition could result
in loss of oil, failure of the MGB, and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective August 1, 2012.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) or 15
days, whichever occurs earlier, and thereafter
before the first flight of each day, not to
exceed 10 hours TIS between inspections,
accomplish the following:
(1) Clean and inspect, using a 10x or higher
power magnifying glass, the MGB housing for
a crack in the inspection area shown in
Figure 1 of Sikorsky S–92 Alert Service
Bulletin No. ASB 92–63–032 Basic Issue,
dated December 22, 2011.
Note to paragraph (e)(1) of this AD: A crack
may be indicated by the presence of oil in the
inspection area of the MGB housing.
(2) If there is a crack, before further flight,
replace the MGB with an airworthy MGB.
(3) Compliance with the one-time eddycurrent inspection of the main module
assembly of the MGB in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.C,
of Sikorsky S–92 ASB No. ASB 92–63–034
Basic Issue, dated March 8, 2012, by a
technician certified to non-destructive testing
Level II or greater is an optional terminating
action for the inspection requirements of this
AD.
(f) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits will not be issued.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:47 Jul 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
41891
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(1) The Manager, Boston Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, may approve
AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to:
Michael Schwetz, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Boston Aircraft Certification Office, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
telephone (718) 238–7761; email
michael.schwetz@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
Federal Aviation Administration
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6320: Main Rotor Gearbox.
(i) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Sikorsky S–92 Alert Service Bulletin No.
ASB 92–63–032 Basic Issue, dated December
22, 2011;
(ii) Sikorsky S–92 Alert Service Bulletin
No. ASB 92–63–034 Basic Issue, dated March
8, 2012.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation, Attn: Manager, Commercial
Technical Support, mailstop s581a, 6900
Main Street, Stratford, CT 06614; telephone
(800) 562–4409; email address
tsslibrary@sikorsky.com; or at https://
www.sikorsky.com.
(4) You may review copies of this service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137.
(5) You may also review copies of this
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 2,
2012.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–16944 Filed 7–16–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0677; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–105–AD; Amendment
39–17114; AD 2012–13–12]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
Model G–IV, GIV–X, GV, and GV–SP
airplanes. This AD requires measuring
to determine paint thickness on the
flight control surfaces and corrective
actions if necessary, and revising the
Airplane Flight Manual (AFM). This AD
was prompted by reports of failure to
inspect or document the paint thickness
on flight controls (ailerons, rudder,
elevator), potentially having a negative
impact on the flutter characteristics of
the airplane. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct paint thickness on
flight controls, which could result in
loss of control of the airplane due to
flutter.
SUMMARY:
This AD is effective August 1,
2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of August 1, 2012.
We must receive comments on this
AD by August 31, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation, Technical Publications
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 17, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41889-41891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16944]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0715; Directorate Identifier 2012-SW-039-AD;
Amendment 39-17122; AD 2012-14-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-92A helicopters. This
AD requires inspecting the main gearbox (MGB) for a crack. This AD is
prompted by a crack in the cored passage of the MGB housing, which may
be indicated by oil on the housing. These actions are intended to
detect a crack in the MGB housing, which could result in loss of oil,
failure of the MGB, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 1, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain documents listed in this AD as of August 1, 2012.
We must receive comments on this AD by September 17, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the economic evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Operations Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation, Attn: Manager, Commercial Technical Support,
mailstop s581a, 6900 Main Street, Stratford, CT 06614; telephone (800)
562-4409; email address tsslibrary@sikorsky.com; or at https://www.sikorsky.com. You may review a copy of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Schwetz, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Boston Aircraft Certification Office, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, FAA, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
telephone (718) 238-7761; email michael.schwetz@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, we
invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that resulted
from adopting this AD. The most helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the AD, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time. We will file in the docket all comments that
we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public
contact with
[[Page 41890]]
FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking during the comment period. We
will consider all the comments we receive and may conduct additional
rulemaking based on those comments.
Discussion
This AD is prompted by an incident in which a crack in the MGB
housing, in the cored passage area adjacent to the scissor bracket
mount, allowed a measurable amount of oil to leak from the MGB. This
condition, if not corrected, could result in loss of oil, failure of
the MGB and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
FAA's Determination
We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other helicopters of the same type
design.
Related Service Information
Sikorsky has developed inspection procedures and issued Sikorsky S-
92 Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. ASB 92-63-032 Basic Issue, dated
December 22, 2011 (ASB 92-63-032), to detect a crack in the MGB by
inspecting the area of the MGB housing, as indicated in Figure 1 of ASB
92-63-032, for the presence of oil. We reviewed ASB 92-63-032, which
describes procedures to inspect the MGB for indications of oil leakage.
If indications of oil leakage are found, ASB 92-63-032 specifies
cleaning the inspection area, performing a ground run and confirming
the source of the leakage by using a specified ultraviolet light and
repeating the visual inspection using a 10X magnifying glass. If any
oil leakage is found, the ASB 92-63-032 states that the MGB is not to
be used for further flight until direction is provided by Sikorsky. ASB
92-63-032 also requires a recurrent inspection for any oil leakage, and
references Sikorsky Maintenance Manual Temporary Revision No. 63-50,
(TR 63-50), and Temporary Revision No. 5-104 (TR 5-104), both dated
December 22, 2011. TR 63-50 adds the MGB inspection procedures to the
aircraft maintenance manual, and TR 5-104 adds the MGB inspection
requirement to the ``Before First Flight of the Day Checklist.'' TR 5-
104 also specifies inspecting the MGB before the first flight of the
day, not to exceed 10 flight hours between inspections.
Since issuing ASB 92-63-032, Sikorsky has issued S-92 ASB No. ASB
92-63-034 Basic Issue, dated March 8, 2012 (ASB 92-63-034), which
describes procedures to detect cracks in the MGB main module assembly
with a one-time eddy-current and fluorescent-penetrant inspection. ASB
92-63-034 also states that upon compliance with the eddy-current
inspection ``the daily visual inspection implemented by ASB 92-63-032
is waived.''
AD Requirements
This AD requires repetitively inspecting the main gearbox with a
10X magnifying glass for a crack. If there is a crack, or if any oil
leakage is detected, this AD requires replacing the MGB with an
airworthy MGB. This AD also provides for a one-time eddy-current
inspection of the main module assembly of the MGB as an optional
terminating action.
Differences Between This AD and the Service Information
The ASB requires inspecting for any oil leakage, while this AD
requires inspecting for a crack, which may be indicated by the presence
of oil leakage. The ASB requires sending photographic documentation of
any oil leakage to Sikorsky; this AD does not. The ASB also requires
contacting Sikorsky for further direction if any oil leakage is
confirmed; this AD requires replacing any affected MGB with an
airworthy MGB.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 16 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs, at
an average labor rate of $85 per hour, in order to comply with this AD.
Inspecting the MGB will require one work hour for a total cost to the
operator of $85 and a cost to the entire U.S. fleet of $1,360 per
inspection cycle. Performing the eddy-current inspection of the MGB
will require 2 work hours for a total cost to the operator of $170 and
a cost to the entire U.S. fleet of $2,720. If cracked, we estimate
replacing a MGB will require 112 work hours and required parts will
cost $260,000, for a total cost to the operator of $269,520.
FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date
Providing an opportunity for public comments prior to adopting
these AD requirements would delay implementing the safety actions
needed to correct this known unsafe condition. Therefore, we find that
the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment
prior to the adoption of this rule because the required corrective
actions must be accomplished within 10 hours time-in-service, and
repeated on a daily basis. These helicopters are primarily used in the
offshore industry, and this is a very short compliance time for this
industry.
Since an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we determined that notice and opportunity for
public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good
cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
Reference, Safety.
[[Page 41891]]
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2012-14-08 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation: Amendment 39-17122; Docket
No. FAA-2012-0715; Directorate Identifier 2012-SW-039-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Model S-92A helicopters, serial numbers
920006 through 920155, certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in the main
gearbox (MGB) housing cored oil passage. This condition could result
in loss of oil, failure of the MGB, and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.
(c) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective August 1, 2012.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) or 15 days, whichever
occurs earlier, and thereafter before the first flight of each day,
not to exceed 10 hours TIS between inspections, accomplish the
following:
(1) Clean and inspect, using a 10x or higher power magnifying
glass, the MGB housing for a crack in the inspection area shown in
Figure 1 of Sikorsky S-92 Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB 92-63-032
Basic Issue, dated December 22, 2011.
Note to paragraph (e)(1) of this AD: A crack may be indicated by
the presence of oil in the inspection area of the MGB housing.
(2) If there is a crack, before further flight, replace the MGB
with an airworthy MGB.
(3) Compliance with the one-time eddy-current inspection of the
main module assembly of the MGB in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.C, of Sikorsky S-92 ASB No.
ASB 92-63-034 Basic Issue, dated March 8, 2012, by a technician
certified to non-destructive testing Level II or greater is an
optional terminating action for the inspection requirements of this
AD.
(f) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits will not be issued.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, may
approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: Michael Schwetz,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Boston Aircraft Certification Office,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; telephone (718) 238-7761; email
michael.schwetz@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6320: Main Rotor
Gearbox.
(i) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Sikorsky S-92 Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB 92-63-032 Basic
Issue, dated December 22, 2011;
(ii) Sikorsky S-92 Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB 92-63-034
Basic Issue, dated March 8, 2012.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Attn: Manager, Commercial Technical
Support, mailstop s581a, 6900 Main Street, Stratford, CT 06614;
telephone (800) 562-4409; email address tsslibrary@sikorsky.com; or
at https://www.sikorsky.com.
(4) You may review copies of this service information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
(5) You may also review copies of this service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 2, 2012.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-16944 Filed 7-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P