Reorganization and Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 202 Under Alternative Site Framework Los Angeles, CA, 41742 [2012-17294]
Download as PDF
41742
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2012 / Notices
advanced indicator programs will also
be discussed during the first day of the
hearing.
The second day will include a
presentation by CSB staff on
preliminary findings of the agency’s
Macondo incident investigation on the
use of safety indicators and major
accident prevention. Evidence will be
presented on the way safety was
managed at Macondo and the influence
of the regulator in driving safety
performance offshore.
All staff presentations are preliminary
and are intended solely to allow the
Board to consider in a public forum the
issues and factors involved in this case.
No factual analyses, conclusions or
findings presented by staff should be
considered final until approved by the
Board.
Please notify CSB if a translator or
interpreter is needed, at least 5 business
days prior to the public meeting. For
more information, please contact Hillary
J. Cohen at hillary.cohen@csb.gov at the
Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board at (202)–261–7600,
or visit our Web site at: www.csb.gov.
The CSB is an independent Federal
agency charged with investigating
industrial accidents that result in the
release of extremely hazardous
substances. The agency’s board
members are appointed by the President
and confirmed by the Senate. CSB
investigations look into all aspects of
accidents, including physical causes
such as equipment failure as well as
inadequacies in regulations, industry
standards, and safety management
systems.
Daniel Horowitz,
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2012–17304 Filed 7–12–12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6350–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1838]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Reorganization and Expansion of
Foreign-Trade Zone 202 Under
Alternative Site Framework Los
Angeles, CA
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR
1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR
3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069–71070,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Jul 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
11/22/2010) as an option for the
establishment or reorganization of
general-purpose zones;
Whereas, the Board of Harbor
Commissioners of the City of Los
Angeles, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone
202, submitted an application to the
Board (FTZ Docket 9–2012, filed 02/09/
2012) for authority to reorganize and
expand under the ASF with a service
area of Orange County and portions of
Los Angeles and San Bernardino
Counties, California, within and
adjacent to the Los Angeles-Long Beach
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
port of entry, FTZ 202’s Site 9 would be
renumbered to create new Sites 30 and
31, Sites 1, 4, 7, 10–11, 14, 20 and 22
would be categorized as magnet sites,
Sites 2, 5, 9, 12, 15, 19, 25, 27–28 and
30–31 would be categorized as usage
driven sites, Sites 16, 24 and 26 would
be removed from the zone project, and
the grantee proposes one new usagedriven site (Site 29);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (77 FR 8804–8805, 02/15/2012)
and the application has been processed
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendation of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the proposal is in the public
interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 202
under the alternative site framework is
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.13, to the Board’s standard
2,000-acre activation limit for the
overall general-purpose zone project, to
a five-year ASF sunset provision for
magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Sites 4, 7, 10–11, 14, 20
and 22 if not activated by July 31, 2017,
and to a three-year ASF sunset
provision for usage-driven sites that
would terminate authority for Sites 2, 5,
9, 12, 15, 19, 25, 27–31 if no foreignstatus merchandise is admitted for a
bona fide customs purpose by July 31,
2015.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of
July 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–17294 Filed 7–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
In the Matter of: Humane Restraint,
Inc., 912 Bethel Circle, Waunakee, WI
53597, Respondent; Order Relating To
Humane Restraint, Inc
The Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’),
has notified Humane Restraint, Inc. of
Wanakee, WI (‘‘HR’’), of its intention to
initiate an administrative proceeding
against HR pursuant to Section 766.3 of
the Export Administration Regulations
(the ‘‘Regulations’’),1 and Section 13(c)
of the Export Administration Act of
1979, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’),2 through
the issuance of a Proposed Charging
Letter to HR that alleged that HR
committed 32 violations of the
Regulations. Specifically, these charges
are:
Charges 1–27 15 CFR 764.2(a)—
Engaging in Prohibited Conduct by
Exporting Various Restraint Devices
Without the Required Government
Authorizations
On 27 occasions between on or about
April 10, 2006 and on or about August
8, 2008, HR engaged in conduct
prohibited by the Regulations by
exporting various restraint devices,
including, but not limited to, strait
jackets, bed restraints, and wrist and
ankle restraints, items subject to the
Regulations, classified under Export
Control Classification Number
(‘‘ECCN’’) 0A982, controlled for Crime
Control reasons, and valued at
approximately $14,697, from the United
States to Germany, Greece, Hungary,
Ireland, New Zealand, South Korea,
Taiwan, and the United Kingdom
without the Department of Commerce
licenses required by Section 742.7(a) of
the Regulations. In so doing, HR
committed 27 violations of Section
764.2(a) of the Regulations.
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730–
774 (2012). The charged violations occurred in
2006–2008. The Regulations governing the
violations at issue are found in the 2006–2008
versions of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR
Parts 730–774 (2006–2008)). The 2012 Regulations
set forth the procedures that apply to this matter.
2 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420 (2000). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has
been extended by successive Presidential Notices,
the most recent being that of August 12, 2011 (76
FR 50661 (Aug. 16, 2011)), continues the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701,
et seq.).
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 136 (Monday, July 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 41742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17294]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1838]
Reorganization and Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 202 Under
Alternative Site Framework Los Angeles, CA
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (74
FR 1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069-
71070, 11/22/2010) as an option for the establishment or reorganization
of general-purpose zones;
Whereas, the Board of Harbor Commissioners of the City of Los
Angeles, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 202, submitted an application to
the Board (FTZ Docket 9-2012, filed 02/09/2012) for authority to
reorganize and expand under the ASF with a service area of Orange
County and portions of Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties,
California, within and adjacent to the Los Angeles-Long Beach U.S.
Customs and Border Protection port of entry, FTZ 202's Site 9 would be
renumbered to create new Sites 30 and 31, Sites 1, 4, 7, 10-11, 14, 20
and 22 would be categorized as magnet sites, Sites 2, 5, 9, 12, 15, 19,
25, 27-28 and 30-31 would be categorized as usage driven sites, Sites
16, 24 and 26 would be removed from the zone project, and the grantee
proposes one new usage-driven site (Site 29);
Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal
Register (77 FR 8804-8805, 02/15/2012) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the
public interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 202 under the alternative site
framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's
regulations, including Section 400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000-
acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, to
a five-year ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Sites 4, 7, 10-11, 14, 20 and 22 if not activated by July
31, 2017, and to a three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven
sites that would terminate authority for Sites 2, 5, 9, 12, 15, 19, 25,
27-31 if no foreign-status merchandise is admitted for a bona fide
customs purpose by July 31, 2015.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of July 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-17294 Filed 7-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P