United States Standards for Grades of Almonds in the Shell, 41707-41709 [2012-17229]
Download as PDF
41707
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 136
Monday, July 16, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
Products Division Web site at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/freshinspection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Carl Newell, at the above address or call
(540) 361–1120.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Executive Order 12866 Regulatory
Flexibility Act
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 51
[Doc. Number FV–11–0046]
United States Standards for Grades of
Almonds in the Shell
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS), of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA), is proposing to
revise the United States Standards for
Grades of Almonds in the Shell. AMS
received written requests from the
produce industry to amend the
standards to align inspection procedures
for incoming inspections (based on the
marketing order) and outgoing
inspections (based on the grade
standards). Therefore, AMS is proposing
to change the determination of internal
defects from count to weight.
DATES: Comments must be received by
August 15, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments to
the Standardization and Training
Branch, Fresh Products Division, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, National Training and
Development Center, Riverside Business
Park, 100 Riverside Parkway, Suite 101,
Fredericksburg, VA 22406: Fax (540)
361–1199, or on the Web at:
www.regulation.gov. Comments should
make reference to the dates and page
number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the above office
during regular business hours.
Comments can also be viewed on the
www.regulations.gov Web site. The
current United States Standards for
Almonds in the Shell, along with the
proposed changes, will be available
either through the address cited above
or by accessing the AMS, Fresh
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:23 Jul 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of the proposed
action on small entities. The purpose of
the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the
scale of businesses subject to such
actions so that small businesses will not
be unduly or disproportionately
burdened. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis. Interested parties are
invited to submit information on the
regulatory and informational impacts of
these actions on small businesses.
This rule proposes to revise the
United States Standards for Grades of
Almonds in the Shell (standards) that
were issued under the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621–
1627). Standards issued under the 1946
Act are voluntary.
Small agricultural service firms,
which include handlers, have been
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201)
as those having annual receipts of less
than $7,000,000 and small agricultural
producers have been defined as those
having annual receipts of less than
$750,000.
There are approximately 53 handlers
of almonds that would potentially be
affected by the changes set forth in this
proposed rule and approximately 6,500
producers of almonds. Information
provided by the Almond Board of
California (ABC) indicates that
approximately 36 percent of the
handlers would be considered small
agricultural service firms.
According to data reported by the
National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS), the two-year average crop value
for 2008–09 and 2009–10 was $2.566
billion. Dividing that average by 6,500
producers yields average estimated
producer revenues of $394,769, which
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
suggests that the majority of almond
producers would be considered small
entities according to the SBA’s
definition.
The California almond bearing
acreage increased approximately 9
percent between 2008 and 2010, from
680,000 to 740,000 acres.
Approximately 1.643 billion pounds
(shelled basis) of almonds were
produced during the 2009–10 season.
More than two thirds of California’s
almond crop is exported to
approximately 90 countries worldwide,
and comprises nearly 80 percent of the
world’s almond supply.
The changes proposed herein will
have the effect of improving grading
methods and accuracy without adding
any additional financial burden to
buyers or sellers of almonds in the shell.
This rule changes one step in a multistep grading procedure (7 CFR 51.2080)
and changes the method of determining
one of five tolerances used in
determining grade (7 CFR
51.2075(b)(5)). The outgoing inspection
procedure will become more closely
aligned with incoming inspection by
shifting the basis (from count to weight)
in the standards for determining the
percentage of internal defects in an
inspection sample of almonds in the
shell.
In addition to simplifying the grading
process, the weight basis would yield a
more accurate percentage of internal
defects. With a count method, a defect
such as shriveling would result in a
particular kernel being counted as one
of the 300 kernels in the sample with
internal defects, even if the defect left
only a small portion of the original
kernel in the sample. Due to its lower
weight relative to a fully formed kernel,
a shriveled kernel has a smaller impact
on the percentage of internal defects
when the sample is weighed rather than
counted.
The lower average percentage of
internal defects using the weight
method was confirmed by a review of
shipping point inspection records, with
14 examples in which both the count
and weight method were used on the
same sample of inshell almonds. The
average serious damage percentages of
the count method and the weight
method were 1.5 percent and 0.8
percent, respectively. Smaller
percentages of defects in sampled lots
using the weight method will mean
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
41708
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
larger quantities of almonds meet a
particular grade, which would
positively affect the quality of the
almonds, as it would yield more
accurate percentages of defects,
resulting in higher payments to growers.
Shifting the determination of internal
(kernel) defects from a count basis to a
weight basis in the standards is
expected to contribute to efficiencies in
the grading process. It would make the
internal defects aspect of the outgoing
inspection process consistent with that
of the incoming inspection. Weighing
rather than counting the kernels may
result in slightly more time in the
inspection process, but any potential
effect on the cost of inspections is
expected to be minor or nonexistent,
and would be offset by the benefits.
There is no disproportionate impact
on smaller entities; entities of all sizes
will benefit.
This rule would not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
almond producers, handlers or
exporters and will be done at no cost to
the industry.
The use of grading services and
grading standards is voluntary unless
required by a specific Act, Federal
Marketing Order or Agreement, or other
regulations governing domestic, import
or export shipments.
USDA has not identified any Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this rule. However, there is a
marketing program which regulates the
handling of almonds under 7 CFR part
981. The revision being proposed in this
action only affects the inspection
procedures for internal defects in the
standards. As such, the proposed action
would not affect almonds in the shell
under the marketing order.
Alternatives were considered for this
action. One alternative would be to not
issue a proposed rule. However, the
need for revisions remains due to
differing procedures for incoming and
outgoing almond inspections, and the
proposal is the result of a request by
industry. Further, the purpose of these
standards is to facilitate the marketing
of agricultural commodities.
Executive Order 12988
The rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This action is not intended to
have retroactive effect. There are no
administrative procedures which must
be exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of the rule.
Section 203(c) of the Act directs and
authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture
‘‘to develop and improve standards of
quality, condition, quantity, grade and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:23 Jul 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
packaging and recommend and
demonstrate such standards in order to
encourage uniformity and consistency
in commercial practices.’’ AMS is
committed to carrying out this authority
in a manner that facilitates the
marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards
available upon request.
Background
On March 11, 2011, AMS received a
letter from the Almond Board of
California (Board) requesting that the
procedure for measuring internal
(kernel) defects in the United States
Standards for Grades of Almonds in the
Shell be changed from a count basis to
a weight basis. The purpose of this
change is to align incoming and
outgoing inspection procedures.
Currently, almonds must undergo
incoming inspections and may undergo
outgoing inspections. The almond
marketing order (part 981—Almonds
Grown in California) mandates that the
percentage of inedible kernels is
determined during an incoming
inspection. As required in the marketing
order (7 CFR 981.42 and 981.442
(Quality Control)), Federally licensed
state inspectors perform these
inspections on 100% of the product
moving from growers to handlers
(packers). Inedible kernel is defined in
section 981.8 and 981.408 of the
marketing order and is based on internal
(kernel) defects as defined in the
standards, in sections 51.2087 (Decay),
51.2088 (Rancidity), 51.2089 (Damage)
and 51.2090 (Serious Damage).
Federally licensed state inspectors
also perform outgoing inspections,
which are voluntary, on approximately
75% of all of the almonds going from
the handlers to domestic and
international markets, according to
shipping point records maintained by
Federal State Inspection.
The current procedures for
determining the percentage of defective
kernels in the two different inspections
are not the same. For incoming
inspections, the percentage of inedible
kernels is determined on a weight basis.
With outgoing inspections, however,
determining the percentage of internal
(kernel) defects, which is one step in a
multi-step procedure specified in the
standards for determining U.S. grade, is
done through a combination of count
and weight of the nuts in the sample.
This proposed change would more
closely align the procedures of the
incoming and outgoing inspections.
A key reason for making this change
is the increasing magnitude of exports of
almonds in the shell. Between the
2006/07 and 2009/10 seasons, export
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
shipments of almonds in the shell
doubled, rising from 148 to 297 million
pounds (inshell basis), according to
trade data from the Foreign Agricultural
Service of USDA. During this same time
period, the number of handlers
exporting almonds in the shell
increased by 42%. Due to the
substantial increase in the number of
handlers and volume of shipments, the
Board received numerous inquiries
regarding the reasons for the different
procedures for determining internal
defects on incoming and outgoing
inspections.
A number of handlers asked the
Board’s Food Quality and Safety
Committee (committee) to look into how
to change the standards to make
outgoing inspections more consistent
with the incoming inspection method.
Determining the percentage of nuts with
internal defects is the third of three
required steps in section 51.2080
Determination of Grade. In addition, a
10 percent tolerance for internal (kernel)
defects is one of five tolerances that are
specified in section 51.2075(b)(5) for
determining whether a lot of inshell
almonds is graded as U.S. No. 1.
Committee staff queried handlers that
ship almonds in the shell about
changing the determination of internal
defects from a count basis to a weight
basis, which would apply to both of
these sections.
AMS is proposing to amend section
51.2075(b)(5) by changing the word
‘‘count’’ in the first line to ‘‘weight.’’
The other four tolerances specified in
section 51.2075(b) remain unchanged.
AMS is also proposing to amend section
51.2080 by changing the word ‘‘count’’
in the last line to ‘‘weight.’’ This would
make the internal defects aspect of the
outgoing inspection process consistent
with that of the incoming inspection
mandated by the marketing order.
The proposed rule provides for a 30day comment period for interested
parties to comment on the revisions to
the standard.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 51
Agricultural commodities, Food
grades and standards, Fruits, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Trees, Vegetables.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
7 CFR part 51 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 51—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
2. In § 51.2075, paragraph (b)(5) is
revised to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
§ 51.2075
U.S. No. 1.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) For internal (kernel) defects. 10
percent, by weight, for almonds with
kernels failing to meet the requirements
of this grade: Provided, that not more
than one-half of this tolerance or 5
percent shall be allowed for kernels
affected by decay or rancidity, damaged
by insects or mold or seriously damaged
by shriveling: And provided further,
that no part of this tolerance shall be
allowed for live insects inside the shell.
*
*
*
*
*
3. § 51.2080 is revised to read as
follows:
Determination of Grade
§ 51.2080
Determination of Grade.
In grading the inspection sample, the
percentage of loose hulls, pieces of
shell, chaff and foreign material is
determined on the basis of weight. Next,
the percentages of nuts which are of
dissimilar varieties, undersize or have
adhering hulls or defective shells are
determined by count, using an adequate
portion of the total sample. Finally, the
nuts in that portion of the sample are
cracked and the percentage having
internal defects is determined on the
basis of weight.
Dated: July 11, 2012.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–17229 Filed 7–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
[Docket No. FCIC–12–0006]
RIN 0563–AC39
Common Crop Insurance Regulations;
Florida Citrus Fruit Crop Insurance
Provisions
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
The Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC) proposes to amend
the Common Crop Insurance
Regulations, Florida Citrus Fruit Crop
Insurance Provisions. The intended
effect of this action is to provide policy
changes, to clarify existing policy
provisions to better meet the needs of
policyholders, and to reduce
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:23 Jul 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
vulnerability to program fraud, waste,
and abuse. The proposed changes will
be effective for the 2014 and succeeding
crop years.
DATES: Written comments and opinions
on this proposed rule will be accepted
until close of business August 15, 2012
and will be considered when the rule is
to be made final.
ADDRESSES: FCIC prefers that comments
be submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. You may
submit comments, identified by Docket
ID No. FCIC–12–0006, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Director, Product
Administration and Standards Division,
Risk Management Agency, United States
Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box
419205, Kansas City, MO 64133–6205.
All comments received, including
those received by mail, will be posted
without change to https://www.
regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, and can be
accessed by the public. All comments
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this rule.
For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information,
see https://www.regulations.gov. If you
are submitting comments electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
and want to attach a document, we ask
that it be in a text-based format. If you
want to attach a document that is a
scanned Adobe PDF file, it must be
scanned as text and not as an image,
thus allowing FCIC to search and copy
certain portions of your submissions.
For questions regarding attaching a
document that is a scanned Adobe PDF
file, please contact the RMA Web
Content Team at (816) 823–4694 or by
email at rmaweb.content@rma.usda.gov.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received for any dockets by the name of
the person submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the
complete User Notice and Privacy
Notice for Regulations.gov at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Hoffmann, Director, Product
Administration and Standards Division,
Risk Management Agency, United States
Department of Agriculture, Beacon
Facility, Stop 0812, Room 421, P.O. Box
419205, Kansas City, MO 64141–6205,
telephone (816) 926–7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41709
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
non-significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it
has not been reviewed by the OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of
information in this rule have been
approved by OMB under control
number 0563–0053.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act of 2002, to
promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, or on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation will not have substantial
and direct effects on Tribal governments
and will not have significant Tribal
implications.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 136 (Monday, July 16, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41707-41709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17229]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2012 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 41707]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 51
[Doc. Number FV-11-0046]
United States Standards for Grades of Almonds in the Shell
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA), is proposing to revise the United States Standards
for Grades of Almonds in the Shell. AMS received written requests from
the produce industry to amend the standards to align inspection
procedures for incoming inspections (based on the marketing order) and
outgoing inspections (based on the grade standards). Therefore, AMS is
proposing to change the determination of internal defects from count to
weight.
DATES: Comments must be received by August 15, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to
the Standardization and Training Branch, Fresh Products Division, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, National Training and Development Center, Riverside
Business Park, 100 Riverside Parkway, Suite 101, Fredericksburg, VA
22406: Fax (540) 361-1199, or on the Web at: www.regulation.gov.
Comments should make reference to the dates and page number of this
issue of the Federal Register and will be made available for public
inspection in the above office during regular business hours. Comments
can also be viewed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. The current
United States Standards for Almonds in the Shell, along with the
proposed changes, will be available either through the address cited
above or by accessing the AMS, Fresh Products Division Web site at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/freshinspection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Carl Newell, at the above address
or call (540) 361-1120.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866 Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget.
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the
economic impact of the proposed action on small entities. The purpose
of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses
subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial
regulatory flexibility analysis. Interested parties are invited to
submit information on the regulatory and informational impacts of these
actions on small businesses.
This rule proposes to revise the United States Standards for Grades
of Almonds in the Shell (standards) that were issued under the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621-1627). Standards
issued under the 1946 Act are voluntary.
Small agricultural service firms, which include handlers, have been
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as
those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000 and small
agricultural producers have been defined as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000.
There are approximately 53 handlers of almonds that would
potentially be affected by the changes set forth in this proposed rule
and approximately 6,500 producers of almonds. Information provided by
the Almond Board of California (ABC) indicates that approximately 36
percent of the handlers would be considered small agricultural service
firms.
According to data reported by the National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS), the two-year average crop value for 2008-09 and 2009-10
was $2.566 billion. Dividing that average by 6,500 producers yields
average estimated producer revenues of $394,769, which suggests that
the majority of almond producers would be considered small entities
according to the SBA's definition.
The California almond bearing acreage increased approximately 9
percent between 2008 and 2010, from 680,000 to 740,000 acres.
Approximately 1.643 billion pounds (shelled basis) of almonds were
produced during the 2009-10 season. More than two thirds of
California's almond crop is exported to approximately 90 countries
worldwide, and comprises nearly 80 percent of the world's almond
supply.
The changes proposed herein will have the effect of improving
grading methods and accuracy without adding any additional financial
burden to buyers or sellers of almonds in the shell. This rule changes
one step in a multi-step grading procedure (7 CFR 51.2080) and changes
the method of determining one of five tolerances used in determining
grade (7 CFR 51.2075(b)(5)). The outgoing inspection procedure will
become more closely aligned with incoming inspection by shifting the
basis (from count to weight) in the standards for determining the
percentage of internal defects in an inspection sample of almonds in
the shell.
In addition to simplifying the grading process, the weight basis
would yield a more accurate percentage of internal defects. With a
count method, a defect such as shriveling would result in a particular
kernel being counted as one of the 300 kernels in the sample with
internal defects, even if the defect left only a small portion of the
original kernel in the sample. Due to its lower weight relative to a
fully formed kernel, a shriveled kernel has a smaller impact on the
percentage of internal defects when the sample is weighed rather than
counted.
The lower average percentage of internal defects using the weight
method was confirmed by a review of shipping point inspection records,
with 14 examples in which both the count and weight method were used on
the same sample of inshell almonds. The average serious damage
percentages of the count method and the weight method were 1.5 percent
and 0.8 percent, respectively. Smaller percentages of defects in
sampled lots using the weight method will mean
[[Page 41708]]
larger quantities of almonds meet a particular grade, which would
positively affect the quality of the almonds, as it would yield more
accurate percentages of defects, resulting in higher payments to
growers.
Shifting the determination of internal (kernel) defects from a
count basis to a weight basis in the standards is expected to
contribute to efficiencies in the grading process. It would make the
internal defects aspect of the outgoing inspection process consistent
with that of the incoming inspection. Weighing rather than counting the
kernels may result in slightly more time in the inspection process, but
any potential effect on the cost of inspections is expected to be minor
or nonexistent, and would be offset by the benefits.
There is no disproportionate impact on smaller entities; entities
of all sizes will benefit.
This rule would not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large almond producers,
handlers or exporters and will be done at no cost to the industry.
The use of grading services and grading standards is voluntary
unless required by a specific Act, Federal Marketing Order or
Agreement, or other regulations governing domestic, import or export
shipments.
USDA has not identified any Federal rules that duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with this rule. However, there is a marketing program which
regulates the handling of almonds under 7 CFR part 981. The revision
being proposed in this action only affects the inspection procedures
for internal defects in the standards. As such, the proposed action
would not affect almonds in the shell under the marketing order.
Alternatives were considered for this action. One alternative would
be to not issue a proposed rule. However, the need for revisions
remains due to differing procedures for incoming and outgoing almond
inspections, and the proposal is the result of a request by industry.
Further, the purpose of these standards is to facilitate the marketing
of agricultural commodities.
Executive Order 12988
The rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive effect.
There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted prior to
any judicial challenge to the provisions of the rule.
Section 203(c) of the Act directs and authorizes the Secretary of
Agriculture ``to develop and improve standards of quality, condition,
quantity, grade and packaging and recommend and demonstrate such
standards in order to encourage uniformity and consistency in
commercial practices.'' AMS is committed to carrying out this authority
in a manner that facilitates the marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards available upon request.
Background
On March 11, 2011, AMS received a letter from the Almond Board of
California (Board) requesting that the procedure for measuring internal
(kernel) defects in the United States Standards for Grades of Almonds
in the Shell be changed from a count basis to a weight basis. The
purpose of this change is to align incoming and outgoing inspection
procedures.
Currently, almonds must undergo incoming inspections and may
undergo outgoing inspections. The almond marketing order (part 981--
Almonds Grown in California) mandates that the percentage of inedible
kernels is determined during an incoming inspection. As required in the
marketing order (7 CFR 981.42 and 981.442 (Quality Control)), Federally
licensed state inspectors perform these inspections on 100% of the
product moving from growers to handlers (packers). Inedible kernel is
defined in section 981.8 and 981.408 of the marketing order and is
based on internal (kernel) defects as defined in the standards, in
sections 51.2087 (Decay), 51.2088 (Rancidity), 51.2089 (Damage) and
51.2090 (Serious Damage).
Federally licensed state inspectors also perform outgoing
inspections, which are voluntary, on approximately 75% of all of the
almonds going from the handlers to domestic and international markets,
according to shipping point records maintained by Federal State
Inspection.
The current procedures for determining the percentage of defective
kernels in the two different inspections are not the same. For incoming
inspections, the percentage of inedible kernels is determined on a
weight basis. With outgoing inspections, however, determining the
percentage of internal (kernel) defects, which is one step in a multi-
step procedure specified in the standards for determining U.S. grade,
is done through a combination of count and weight of the nuts in the
sample. This proposed change would more closely align the procedures of
the incoming and outgoing inspections.
A key reason for making this change is the increasing magnitude of
exports of almonds in the shell. Between the 2006/07 and 2009/10
seasons, export shipments of almonds in the shell doubled, rising from
148 to 297 million pounds (inshell basis), according to trade data from
the Foreign Agricultural Service of USDA. During this same time period,
the number of handlers exporting almonds in the shell increased by 42%.
Due to the substantial increase in the number of handlers and volume of
shipments, the Board received numerous inquiries regarding the reasons
for the different procedures for determining internal defects on
incoming and outgoing inspections.
A number of handlers asked the Board's Food Quality and Safety
Committee (committee) to look into how to change the standards to make
outgoing inspections more consistent with the incoming inspection
method. Determining the percentage of nuts with internal defects is the
third of three required steps in section 51.2080 Determination of
Grade. In addition, a 10 percent tolerance for internal (kernel)
defects is one of five tolerances that are specified in section
51.2075(b)(5) for determining whether a lot of inshell almonds is
graded as U.S. No. 1. Committee staff queried handlers that ship
almonds in the shell about changing the determination of internal
defects from a count basis to a weight basis, which would apply to both
of these sections.
AMS is proposing to amend section 51.2075(b)(5) by changing the
word ``count'' in the first line to ``weight.'' The other four
tolerances specified in section 51.2075(b) remain unchanged. AMS is
also proposing to amend section 51.2080 by changing the word ``count''
in the last line to ``weight.'' This would make the internal defects
aspect of the outgoing inspection process consistent with that of the
incoming inspection mandated by the marketing order.
The proposed rule provides for a 30-day comment period for
interested parties to comment on the revisions to the standard.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 51
Agricultural commodities, Food grades and standards, Fruits, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Trees, Vegetables.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 51 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 51--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
2. In Sec. 51.2075, paragraph (b)(5) is revised to read as
follows:
[[Page 41709]]
Sec. 51.2075 U.S. No. 1.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) For internal (kernel) defects. 10 percent, by weight, for
almonds with kernels failing to meet the requirements of this grade:
Provided, that not more than one-half of this tolerance or 5 percent
shall be allowed for kernels affected by decay or rancidity, damaged by
insects or mold or seriously damaged by shriveling: And provided
further, that no part of this tolerance shall be allowed for live
insects inside the shell.
* * * * *
3. Sec. 51.2080 is revised to read as follows:
Determination of Grade
Sec. 51.2080 Determination of Grade.
In grading the inspection sample, the percentage of loose hulls,
pieces of shell, chaff and foreign material is determined on the basis
of weight. Next, the percentages of nuts which are of dissimilar
varieties, undersize or have adhering hulls or defective shells are
determined by count, using an adequate portion of the total sample.
Finally, the nuts in that portion of the sample are cracked and the
percentage having internal defects is determined on the basis of
weight.
Dated: July 11, 2012.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-17229 Filed 7-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P