Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 64 (Expansion of Service Area) Under Alternative Site Framework Jacksonville, FL, 41374 [2012-17159]

Download as PDF 41374 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2012 / Notices 1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/2010) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose zones; Whereas, the State of Delaware, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 99, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 81–2011, filed 12/19/2011) for authority to reorganize and expand under the ASF with a service area of New Castle, Kent and Sussex Counties, Delaware, in and adjacent to the Wilmington U.S. Customs and Border Protection port of entry, FTZ 99’s existing Site 1 would be categorized as a magnet site, and the grantee proposes one initial usage-driven site (Site 2); Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (76 FR 80331, 12/23/2011) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest; Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders: The application to reorganize and expand FTZ 99 under the alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project and to a three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven sites that would terminate authority for Site 2 if no foreign-status merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose by July 31, 2015. Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of July 2012. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. [FR Doc. 2012–17167 Filed 7–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR 1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/2010) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose zones; Whereas, the Jacksonville Port Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 64, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 18–2012, filed 03/19/2012) for authority to expand the service area of the zone to include Bradford, Putnam and St. Johns Counties, as described in the application, within and adjacent to the Jacksonville, Florida, U.S. Customs and Border Protection port of entry; Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (77 FR 17012–17013, 03/23/ 2012) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest; Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders: The application to reorganize FTZ 64 to expand the service area under the alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall generalpurpose zone project. Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of July 2012. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. [FR Doc. 2012–17159 Filed 7–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [Order No. 1840] Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 64 (Expansion of Service Area) Under Alternative Site Framework Jacksonville, FL Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign- VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:08 Jul 12, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–820] Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 28, 2012, the United States Court of International Trade (the Court) sustained the Department of Commerce’s (the Department) final results of redetermination pursuant to the Court’s second remand order. See United States Steel Corporation v. United States, Court No. 08–00216, Slip Op. 12–91 (U.S. Steel Corp. III); Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Second Court Remand, CIT Court No. 08–00216 (May 22, 2012) (Second Remand Results). The Court previously upheld other aspects of the Department’s final results of the 2005– 2006 administrative review of the antidumping duty on certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from India. See U.S. Steel Corp. v. United States, No. 08–00216, 2012 WL 1259085 (Ct. Int’l Trade Apr. 11, 2012) (opinion on first remand results) (U.S. Steel Corp. II); Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, CIT Court No. 08–00216 (Oct. 3, 2011) (First Remand Results); U.S. Steel Corp. v. United States, No. 08–00216, 2011 WL 2421154 (Ct. Int’l Trade June 14, 2011) (opinion on final results) (U.S. Steel Corp. I); Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 31,961 (June 5, 2008) (Final Results). Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in Timken Co., v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades), the Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department’s Final Results and is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain hotrolled carbon steel flat products from India covering the period December 1, 2005, through November 30, 2006, with AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM 13JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 135 (Friday, July 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 41374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1840]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 64 (Expansion of Service 
Area) Under Alternative Site Framework Jacksonville, FL

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (74 
FR 1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069-
71070, 11/22/2010) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of general-purpose zones;
    Whereas, the Jacksonville Port Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade 
Zone 64, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 18-2012, 
filed 03/19/2012) for authority to expand the service area of the zone 
to include Bradford, Putnam and St. Johns Counties, as described in the 
application, within and adjacent to the Jacksonville, Florida, U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection port of entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (77 FR 17012-17013, 03/23/2012) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 64 to expand the service area 
under the alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the 
Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-
purpose zone project.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of July 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-17159 Filed 7-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.