Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 40832-40834 [2012-16962]
Download as PDF
40832
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(2) If the functional ground test of the RAT,
as required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, is
not successful (as defined by the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin specified in
paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii) of this AD):
Before further flight, replace the RAT pump
or the RAT assembly with a serviceable part,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin
specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii) of
this AD.
(3) Any airplane equipped with a RAT
hydraulic pump marked with an ‘‘X’’ or a
date (month/year) in the amendment cell C
of the identification plate, which has been
successfully tested (as defined by the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin specified in
paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii) of this AD) in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin
specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii) of
this AD prior to the effective date of this AD,
is considered compliant with the
requirements of paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2)
of this AD.
(h) Parts Installation
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install any RAT hydraulic pump
or RAT assembly unless it has been
inspected, corrected, and successfully tested
(as defined by the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin
specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii) of
this AD) in accordance with the requirements
of paragraph (g) of this AD, on any airplane.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(i) Definition
A serviceable part is a RAT hydraulic
pump or RAT assembly that has been
inspected, corrected, and successfully tested
(as defined by the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin
specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii) of
this AD), in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin specified in
paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to:
9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jul 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive
2011–0197, dated October 10, 2011, and
the service bulletins specified in paragraphs
(k)(1)(i) and (k)(1)(ii) of this AD, for related
information.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–29–3117, dated July 19, 2011.
(ii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A340–29–4090, dated July 19, 2011.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS—Airworthiness
Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 5,
2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–16966 Filed 7–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0678; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–285–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 747–400,
and –400F series airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by multiple
reports of integrated display unit (IDU)
malfunctions and mode control panel
(MCP) malfunctions. This proposed AD
would require installing new software,
replacing the duct assembly with a new
duct assembly, making wiring changes,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and routing certain wire bundles. We
are proposing this AD to prevent IDU
malfunctions, which could affect the
ability of the flight crew to read primary
displays for airplane attitude, altitude,
or airspeed, and consequently reduce
the ability of the flight crew to maintain
control of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana
Martinez Hueto, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6592;
fax: 425–917–6591; email:
ana.m.hueto@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
40833
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2012–0678; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–285–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received reports of IDU
malfunctions and MCP malfunctions on
Model 747–400, and –400F series
airplanes. The reports range from a
single display malfunction to all six
primary IDUs going blank with an MCP
malfunction, during various flight
phases. Moisture in the flight deck
cooling supply air could cause the IDU
to blink, lose focus, or display in
monochrome and the MCP to go blank.
This condition, if not corrected, could
affect the ability of the flight crew to
read primary displays for airplane
attitude, altitude, or airspeed, and
consequently reduce the ability of the
flight crew to maintain control of the
airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–21A2523, Revision 1,
dated October 3, 2011. This service
information specifies installing new
integrated display system (IDS)
software, replacing the duct assembly
with a new duct assembly, making
wiring changes, and routing certain wire
bundles.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
21A2523, Revision 1, dated October 3,
2011, refers to Boeing Service Bulletin
747–31–2426, dated July 29, 2010 (for
airplanes with Rolls-Royce engines);
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–31–2427,
dated July 29, 2010 (for airplanes with
General Electric engines); and Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–31–2428, dated
July 29, 2010 (for airplanes with Pratt &
Whitney engines); as additional sources
of guidance for installing certain IDS
508 software in each of the six IDUs and
in each of the three EFIS/EICAS
interface units (EIUs)
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 33 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost per
product
Labor cost
Replace duct assembly and do wiring
changes.
Software change .............................................
41 work-hours × $85 per hour = $3,485 ........
$20,121
$23,606
$778,998
3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 .............
0
255
8,415
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this proposed AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all costs in our
cost estimate.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jul 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
Parts cost
Cost on U.S.
operators
Action
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Regulatory Findings
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
40834
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2012–0678; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–285–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 27,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 747–400 and –400F series airplanes;
certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–21A2523,
Revision 1, dated October 3, 2011.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 21, Air Conditioning.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by multiple reports
of integrated display unit (IDU) malfunctions
and mode control panel (MCP) malfunctions.
We are issuing this AD to prevent integrated
display unit (IDU) malfunctions, which could
affect the ability of the flight crew to read
primary displays for airplane attitude,
altitude, or airspeed, and consequently
reduce the ability of the flight crew to
maintain control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(g) Software Update
Within 12 months after the effective date
of this AD: Install integrated display system
software, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–21A2523, Revision 1,
dated October 3, 2011.
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–21A2523,
Revision 1, dated October 3, 2011, refers to
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–31–2426, dated
July 29, 2010 (for airplanes with Rolls-Royce
engines); Boeing Service Bulletin 747–31–
2427, dated July 29, 2010 (for airplanes with
General Electric engines); and Boeing Service
Bulletin 747–31–2428, dated July 29, 2010
(for airplanes with Pratt & Whitney engines);
as additional sources of guidance for the
software installation specified by paragraph
(g) of this AD.
(h) Replacement of Duct Assembly and
Wiring Changes
Within 60 months after the effective date
of this AD: Replace the duct assembly with
a new duct assembly, do wiring changes, and
route certain wire bundles, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–21A2523,
Revision 1, dated October 3, 2011.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jul 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
Ana Martinez Hueto, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–
917–6592; fax: 425–917–6591; email:
ana.m.hueto@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 29,
2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–16962 Filed 7–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1213; Airspace
Docket No. 11–ANM–23]
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Dillon, MT
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA is issuing a SNPRM
for the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) published on March 15, 2012,
in order to elicit comments addressing
the proposed amendment to create Class
E surface airspace and further expand
the previous proposed amendment of
Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Dillon
Airport, Dillon, MT, to accommodate
aircraft using new Area Navigation
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(RNAV) Global Positioning System
(GPS) standard instrument approach
procedures. The original NPRM only
proposed an amendment of Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, 20590; telephone (202)
366–9826. You must identify FAA
Docket No. FAA–2011–1213; Airspace
Docket No. 11–ANM–23, at the
beginning of your comments. You may
also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057;
telephone (425) 203–4537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On March 15, 2012, the FAA
published a NPRM to modify Class E
airspace, extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface, at Dillon
Airport, Dillon, MT (77 FR 15295). The
comment period closed April 30, 2012.
One comment was received.
The commenter recommended
establishing Class E surface airspace,
and also expand the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface for aircraft safety. The FAA
found merit in this comment, and,
therefore, proposes the additional
creation of Class E surface airspace, and
modification of existing Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface. The FAA seeks comments
on this SNPRM.
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA
2011–1213 and Airspace Docket No. 11–
ANM–23) and be submitted in triplicate
to the Docket Management System (see
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40832-40834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16962]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0678; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-285-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 747-400, and -400F series airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by multiple reports of integrated display
unit (IDU) malfunctions and mode control panel (MCP) malfunctions. This
proposed AD would require installing new software, replacing the duct
assembly with a new duct assembly, making wiring changes, and routing
certain wire bundles. We are proposing this AD to prevent IDU
malfunctions, which could affect the ability of the flight crew to read
primary displays for airplane attitude, altitude, or airspeed, and
consequently reduce the ability of the flight crew to maintain control
of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 27, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana Martinez Hueto, Aerospace
Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6592; fax: 425-917-6591; email:
ana.m.hueto@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 40833]]
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0678;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-285-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received reports of IDU malfunctions and MCP malfunctions
on Model 747-400, and -400F series airplanes. The reports range from a
single display malfunction to all six primary IDUs going blank with an
MCP malfunction, during various flight phases. Moisture in the flight
deck cooling supply air could cause the IDU to blink, lose focus, or
display in monochrome and the MCP to go blank. This condition, if not
corrected, could affect the ability of the flight crew to read primary
displays for airplane attitude, altitude, or airspeed, and consequently
reduce the ability of the flight crew to maintain control of the
airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-21A2523, Revision 1,
dated October 3, 2011. This service information specifies installing
new integrated display system (IDS) software, replacing the duct
assembly with a new duct assembly, making wiring changes, and routing
certain wire bundles.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-21A2523, Revision 1, dated
October 3, 2011, refers to Boeing Service Bulletin 747-31-2426, dated
July 29, 2010 (for airplanes with Rolls-Royce engines); Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-31-2427, dated July 29, 2010 (for airplanes with General
Electric engines); and Boeing Service Bulletin 747-31-2428, dated July
29, 2010 (for airplanes with Pratt & Whitney engines); as additional
sources of guidance for installing certain IDS 508 software in each of
the six IDUs and in each of the three EFIS/EICAS interface units (EIUs)
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 33 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace duct assembly and do wiring 41 work-hours x $85 per $20,121 $23,606 $778,998
changes. hour = $3,485.
Software change....................... 3 work-hours x $85 per 0 255 8,415
hour = $255.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
[[Page 40834]]
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2012-0678; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-285-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 27, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-400 and -400F
series airplanes; certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-21A2523, Revision 1, dated October
3, 2011.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 21, Air Conditioning.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by multiple reports of integrated display
unit (IDU) malfunctions and mode control panel (MCP) malfunctions.
We are issuing this AD to prevent integrated display unit (IDU)
malfunctions, which could affect the ability of the flight crew to
read primary displays for airplane attitude, altitude, or airspeed,
and consequently reduce the ability of the flight crew to maintain
control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Software Update
Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD: Install
integrated display system software, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
21A2523, Revision 1, dated October 3, 2011.
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-21A2523, Revision 1, dated October 3, 2011, refers to
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-31-2426, dated July 29, 2010 (for
airplanes with Rolls-Royce engines); Boeing Service Bulletin 747-31-
2427, dated July 29, 2010 (for airplanes with General Electric
engines); and Boeing Service Bulletin 747-31-2428, dated July 29,
2010 (for airplanes with Pratt & Whitney engines); as additional
sources of guidance for the software installation specified by
paragraph (g) of this AD.
(h) Replacement of Duct Assembly and Wiring Changes
Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD: Replace
the duct assembly with a new duct assembly, do wiring changes, and
route certain wire bundles, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-21A2523, Revision
1, dated October 3, 2011.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the
person identified in the Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, Ana Martinez Hueto,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6592; fax:
425-917-6591; email: ana.m.hueto@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 29, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-16962 Filed 7-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P