Safety Zone; Nautical City Festival Air Show, Rogers City MI, 40798-40800 [2012-16897]
Download as PDF
40798
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Data Quality Act
In developing this rule, we did not
conduct or use a study, experiment, or
survey requiring peer review under the
Data Quality Act (Pub. L. 106–554).
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 950
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: April 27, 2012.
Allen D. Klein,
Regional Director, Western Region.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 30 CFR part 950 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 950—WYOMING
1. The authority citation for part 950
continues to read as follows:
■
Table of Acronyms
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
2. In § 950.12:
a. Remove ‘‘; and’’ from paragraph
(a)(11) and add a period in its place; and
■ b. Remove paragraph (a)(12).
■
■
[FR Doc. 2012–16940 Filed 7–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0389]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Nautical City Festival Air
Show, Rogers City MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone in the Captain
of the Port Sault Sainte Marie zone. This
safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from certain portions of water
areas within Sector Sault Sainte Marie
Captain of the Port zone. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with an air show
performance.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 1 p.m.
on August 3, 2012 until 5 p.m. on
August 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket [USCG–2012–0389]. To view
documents in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Jul 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box, and
click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ You may visit the
Docket Management Facility,
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email MST2 Kevin Moe,
U.S. Coast Guard, Sector Sault Sainte
Marie, telephone 906–253–2429, email
at Kevin.D.Moe@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
On May 21, 2012, we published an
NPRM entitled Safety Zone; Nautical
City Festival Air Show, Rogers City MI;
in the Federal Register (77 FR 29932).
We received no comments on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Due to the timing of the event,
waiting 30 days to make this rule
effective would be impracticable.
B. Basis and Purpose
On the weekend of August 3 through
5, 2012, the Nautical City Festival will
be celebrating Calcite’s 100th
Anniversary. As part of that celebration,
an air show will be launched to the east
of the Rogers City marina. The Captain
of the Port Sault Sainte Marie has
determined that the air show event
poses various hazards to the public such
as debris falling into the water and
general congestion of the waterway.
C. Discussion of Rule
To safeguard against the dangers
posed by the Nautical City Festival Air
Show near Rogers City, MI, the Captain
of the Port Sault Sainte Marie has
determined that a temporary safety zone
is necessary. Thus, the Captain of the
Port Sault Sainte Marie is establishing a
safety zone on Lake Huron to include all
waters within a 5000′ by 2000′ rectangle
bounded by a line drawn from
45°25′30.67″ N, 083°48′19.54″ W then
southeast to 45°25′24.85″ N, 083°
47′09.68″ W then southwest to
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45°25′05.41″ N, 083°47′12.84″ W then
northwest to 45°25′11.30″ N
083°48′22.88″ W then back to the point
of origin [DATUM: NAD 83].
This safety zone will be effective from
1:00 p.m. on August 3, 2012 until 5:00
p.m. on August 5, 2012. However, it will
only be enforced from 1:00 p.m. until
5:00 p.m. each day on August 3–5, 2012.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Sector Sault Sainte Marie or his onscene representative. All persons and
vessels authorized to enter the safety
zone shall comply with the instructions
of the Coast Guard Captain of the Port
or the designated on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port
or his on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The
Office of Management and Budget has
not reviewed it under these Orders. It is
not ‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this rule is not
a significant regulatory action because
we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The safety
zone will be relatively small and will
exist for only a minimal time. Under
certain conditions, moreover, vessels
may still transit through the safety zone
when permitted by proper authority.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM
11JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities; owners and operators of vessels
intending to transit the waters near
Rogers City, Michigan, between 1 p.m.
and 5 p.m. on August 3 through 5, 2012.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the same reasons discussed in the
Regulatory Planning and Review
section.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Jul 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40799
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction because it
involves the establishment of a safety
zone. A final environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0389 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0389 Safety Zone: Nautical City
Festival Air Show, Rogers City MI.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All U.S.
navigable waters of Lake Huron inside
a 5000′ by 2000′ rectangle bounded by
a line drawn from 45°25′30.67″ N,
083°48′19.54″ W then southeast to
45°25′24.85″ N, 083°47′09.68″ W then
southwest to 45°25′05.41″ N,
083°47′12.84″ W then northwest to
45°25′11.30″ N 083°48′22.88″ W then
back to the point of origin [DATUM:
NAD 83].
(b) Effective and Enforcement period.
This regulation is effective from 1 p.m.
on August 3, 2012 until 5 p.m. on
August 5, 2012. It will only be enforced,
however, from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m. each
day from August 3th until August 5th.
(1) The Captain of the Port, Sector
Sault Sainte Marie may suspend at any
time the enforcement of the safety zone
established under this section.
(2) The Captain of the Port, Sector
Sault Sainte Marie, will notify the
public of the enforcement and
suspension of enforcement of the safety
zone established by this section via any
means that will provide as much notice
E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM
11JYR1
40800
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
as possible to the public. These means
might include some or all of those listed
in 33 CFR 165.7(a). The primary method
of notification, however, will be through
Broadcast Notice to Mariners and local
Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer designated by
the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie to monitor these safety zones,
permit entry into these safety zones,
give legally enforceable orders to
persons or vessels within these safety
zones, or take other actions authorized
by the Captain of the Port.
(2) Public vessel means a vessel
owned, chartered, or operated by the
United States or by a State or political
subdivision thereof.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations in 33 CFR 165.23 apply.
(2) All persons and vessels must
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port Sault
Sainte Marie or a designated
representative. Upon being hailed by the
U.S. Coast Guard by siren, radio,
flashing light or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(3) When the safety zone established
by this section is being enforced, all
vessels must obtain permission from the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie
or his or her designated representative
to enter, move within, or exit that safety
zone. Vessels and persons granted
permission to enter the safety zone shall
obey all lawful orders or directions of
the Captain of the Port or his or her
designated representative. While within
the safety zone, all vessels shall operate
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course.
(e) Exemption. Public vessels, as
defined in paragraph (c) of this section,
are exempt from the requirements in
this section.
Dated: June 21, 2012.
J.C. McGuiness,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sault Sainte Marie.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2012–16897 Filed 7–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0376]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone: Sacramento River
Closure for Aerial Cable Installation,
Sacramento, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the navigable waters of the Sacramento
River near Sherman Island, CA in
support of the Sacramento River Closure
for Aerial Cable Installation on July 11,
2012 through July 13, 2012. This safety
zone is established to ensure the safety
of workers, helicopters, mariners, and
other vessels transiting the area from the
dangers associated with helicopters
operating under heavy loads in close
proximity to power lines. Unauthorized
persons or vessels are prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or
remaining in the safety zone without
permission of the Captain of the Port or
their designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
through 1 p.m. on July 11, 2012 through
July 13, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2012–
0376 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2012–0376 in the ‘‘keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email Ensign William
Hawn, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San
Francisco; telephone (415) 399–7442 or
email at D11-PFMarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Jul 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NPRM
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because the event would occur
before the rulemaking process would be
completed. Because of the dangers
posed by the helicopters operating
under heavy loads in close proximity to
power lines, the safety zone is necessary
to provide for the safety of helicopters,
mariners, and other vessels transiting
the area. For the safety concerns noted,
it is in the public interest to have these
regulations in effect during the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. The Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication because to do otherwise
would be contrary to the public interest
since immediate action is required to
protect helicopters, mariners and
vessels transiting the area.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1 which, collectively, authorize
the Coast Guard to establish safety
zones.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company will
sponsor the Sacramento River Closure
for Aerial Cable Installation on July 11,
2012 through July 13, 2012, in the
navigable waters of the Sacramento
River near Sherman Island, CA. Aerial
operations to install the cable are
scheduled to take place from 6 a.m. to
1 p.m. on July 11, 2012 through July 13,
2012. Upon commencement of the aerial
operations, the safety zone will
encompass the navigable waters around
and under the Sacramento River within
200 yards of a line connecting the
following points: 38°04′15″ N,
121°47′20″ W; 38°03′38″ N, 121°46′58″
E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM
11JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40798-40800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16897]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0389]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Nautical City Festival Air Show, Rogers City MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in the Captain
of the Port Sault Sainte Marie zone. This safety zone is intended to
restrict vessels from certain portions of water areas within Sector
Sault Sainte Marie Captain of the Port zone. This temporary safety zone
is necessary to protect spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with an air show performance.
DATES: This rule is effective from 1 p.m. on August 3, 2012 until 5
p.m. on August 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket [USCG-2012-0389]. To view documents in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box, and click ``SEARCH.'' You
may visit the Docket Management Facility, Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email MST2 Kevin Moe, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector
Sault Sainte Marie, telephone 906-253-2429, email at
Kevin.D.Moe@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
On May 21, 2012, we published an NPRM entitled Safety Zone;
Nautical City Festival Air Show, Rogers City MI; in the Federal
Register (77 FR 29932). We received no comments on the proposed rule.
No public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Due to the timing of the event,
waiting 30 days to make this rule effective would be impracticable.
B. Basis and Purpose
On the weekend of August 3 through 5, 2012, the Nautical City
Festival will be celebrating Calcite's 100th Anniversary. As part of
that celebration, an air show will be launched to the east of the
Rogers City marina. The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie has
determined that the air show event poses various hazards to the public
such as debris falling into the water and general congestion of the
waterway.
C. Discussion of Rule
To safeguard against the dangers posed by the Nautical City
Festival Air Show near Rogers City, MI, the Captain of the Port Sault
Sainte Marie has determined that a temporary safety zone is necessary.
Thus, the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie is establishing a
safety zone on Lake Huron to include all waters within a 5000' by 2000'
rectangle bounded by a line drawn from 45[deg]25'30.67'' N,
083[deg]48'19.54'' W then southeast to 45[deg]25'24.85'' N, 083[deg]
47'09.68'' W then southwest to 45[deg]25'05.41'' N, 083[deg]47'12.84''
W then northwest to 45[deg]25'11.30'' N 083[deg]48'22.88'' W then back
to the point of origin [DATUM: NAD 83].
This safety zone will be effective from 1:00 p.m. on August 3, 2012
until 5:00 p.m. on August 5, 2012. However, it will only be enforced
from 1:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. each day on August 3-5, 2012. Entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Sault Sainte Marie
or his on-scene representative. All persons and vessels authorized to
enter the safety zone shall comply with the instructions of the Coast
Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on-scene representative.
The Captain of the Port or his on-scene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order or under section
1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under these Orders. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). We conclude that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will
not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The safety zone will be
relatively small and will exist for only a minimal time. Under certain
conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the safety zone
when permitted by proper authority.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant
[[Page 40799]]
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities; owners and operators of vessels intending to transit
the waters near Rogers City, Michigan, between 1 p.m. and 5 p.m. on
August 3 through 5, 2012.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the same reasons discussed in
the Regulatory Planning and Review section.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
4. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction because it involves the establishment of a safety zone.
A final environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0389 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0389 Safety Zone: Nautical City Festival Air Show,
Rogers City MI.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
U.S. navigable waters of Lake Huron inside a 5000' by 2000' rectangle
bounded by a line drawn from 45[deg]25'30.67'' N, 083[deg]48'19.54'' W
then southeast to 45[deg]25'24.85'' N, 083[deg]47'09.68'' W then
southwest to 45[deg]25'05.41'' N, 083[deg]47'12.84'' W then northwest
to 45[deg]25'11.30'' N 083[deg]48'22.88'' W then back to the point of
origin [DATUM: NAD 83].
(b) Effective and Enforcement period. This regulation is effective
from 1 p.m. on August 3, 2012 until 5 p.m. on August 5, 2012. It will
only be enforced, however, from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m. each day from
August 3th until August 5th.
(1) The Captain of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte Marie may suspend
at any time the enforcement of the safety zone established under this
section.
(2) The Captain of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte Marie, will notify
the public of the enforcement and suspension of enforcement of the
safety zone established by this section via any means that will provide
as much notice
[[Page 40800]]
as possible to the public. These means might include some or all of
those listed in 33 CFR 165.7(a). The primary method of notification,
however, will be through Broadcast Notice to Mariners and local Notice
to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer designated by the Captain of the Port Sault
Sainte Marie to monitor these safety zones, permit entry into these
safety zones, give legally enforceable orders to persons or vessels
within these safety zones, or take other actions authorized by the
Captain of the Port.
(2) Public vessel means a vessel owned, chartered, or operated by
the United States or by a State or political subdivision thereof.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations in 33 CFR 165.23
apply.
(2) All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie or a designated
representative. Upon being hailed by the U.S. Coast Guard by siren,
radio, flashing light or other means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed.
(3) When the safety zone established by this section is being
enforced, all vessels must obtain permission from the Captain of the
Port Sault Sainte Marie or his or her designated representative to
enter, move within, or exit that safety zone. Vessels and persons
granted permission to enter the safety zone shall obey all lawful
orders or directions of the Captain of the Port or his or her
designated representative. While within the safety zone, all vessels
shall operate at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course.
(e) Exemption. Public vessels, as defined in paragraph (c) of this
section, are exempt from the requirements in this section.
Dated: June 21, 2012.
J.C. McGuiness,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2012-16897 Filed 7-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P