Export Administration Regulations, 40493-40494 [2012-16905]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated August 9, 2011, effective
September 15, 2011, is amended as
follows:
Paragraph 5000
Class D airspace.
*
*
*
*
ASO AL D
*
Andalusia, AL [Removed]
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
ASO AL E5 Fort Rucker, AL [Amended]
Fort Rucker, Cairns AAF, AL
(Lat. 31°16′33″ N., long. 85°42′48″ W.)
Andalusia, South Alabama Regional Airport
at Bill Benton Field, AL
(Lat. 31°18′30″ N., long. 86°23′32″ W.)
Florala Municipal Airport, AL
(Lat. 31°02′33″ N., long. 86°18′42″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface within the area
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 31°38′01″
N., long. 86°23′30″ W.; to lat. 31°45′01″ N.,
long. 85°38′00″ W.; to lat. 31°17′01″ N., long.
85°26′00″ W.; thence to lat. 31°04′01″ N.,
long. 85°52′00″ W.; to lat. 31°03′02″ N., long.
86°11′04″ W.; to and clockwise along the arc
of a 6.5-mile radius circle of Florala
Municipal Airport to lat. 31°02′14″ N., long.
86°26′10″ W.; thence to the point of
beginning, and within a 7-mile radius of
South Alabama Regional Airport at Bill
Benton Field.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on June 21,
2012.
Gerald E. Lynch,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2012–16429 Filed 7–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 129
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0140; Amdt. No.
129–49]
RIN 2120–AJ45
Operations Specifications; OMB
Approval of Information Collection
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; OMB approval of
information collection.
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
This document notifies the
public of the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB’s) approval of the
information collection requirement
contained in the FAA’s final rule,
‘‘Operations Specifications,’’ which was
published on February 10, 2011.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
The rule published on February
10, 2011, became effective on April 11,
2011. However, because it contained
new information collection
requirements, compliance with the
information collection provisions
contained in § 129.7 was not required
until they were approved. This
document announces that OMB
approval was received on April 5. 2012.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 2, 2012.
Brenda D. Courtney,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.
For
technical questions contact Darcy D.
Reed, International Programs and Policy
Division, AFS–50, Flight Standards
Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington DC 20591;
email: Darcy.D.Reed@faa.gov;
Telephone: 202–385–8078. For legal
questions contact Lorna John, Office of
the Chief Counsel, Regulations Division,
AGC–200, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
email: Lorna.John@faa.gov; Telephone:
202–267–3921.
15 CFR Parts 740, 742, 748, 750, 752,
and 760
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
*
40493
On
February 10, 2011, the final rule,
‘‘Operations Specifications’’ was
published in the Federal Register (76
FR 7482). In that rule, the FAA clarified
and standardized the rules for
applications by foreign air carriers and
foreign persons for part 129 operations
specifications and established new
standards for amendment, suspension,
and termination of those operations
specifications.
In the DATES section of the final rule,
the FAA noted that affected parties were
not required to comply with the new
information collection requirements in
§ 129.7 until OMB approved the FAA’s
request to collect the information.
Section 129.7 includes new provisions
governing the application, issuance, and
denial of operations specifications. That
information collection requirement had
not been approved by OMB at the time
of publication.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, the FAA submitted a
copy of the new information collection
requirements to OMB for its review.
OMB approved the collection on April
5, 2012, and assigned the information
collection OMB Control Number 2120–
0749, which expires on April 30, 2013.
This document is being published to
inform affected parties of the approval,
and to announce that as of April 5,
2012, affected parties are required to
comply with the new information
collection requirements in § 129.7.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2012–16840 Filed 7–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Export Administration Regulations
CFR Correction
In Title 15 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 300 to 799, revised as
of January 1, 2012, make the following
corrections:
■ 1. On page 248, in § 740.1, correctly
revise the heading of paragraph (d) to
read ‘‘Shippers Export Declaration or
Automated Export System Record’’.
■ 2. On page 321, in § 742.15, move the
note to introductory paragraph (b) from
under (b)(3) to its correct location above
(b)(1), and add the following note under
the introductory paragraph of (b)(3):
§ 742.15
*
Encryption items.
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
*
*
Note to introductory text of paragraph
(b)(3): Once a mass market classification
request is accepted in SNAP–R, you may
export and reexport the encryption
commodity or software under License
Exception ENC as ECCN 5A002 or 5D002,
whichever is applicable, to any end-user
located or headquartered in a country listed
in supplement No. 3 to part 740 as
authorized by § 740.17(b) of the EAR, while
the mass market classification request is
pending review with BIS.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In Supplement No. 2 to part 742:
A. On page 332, remove paragraphs
(c)(10)(i)(A) and (B), and
■ B. On page 336, add (c)(25)(i) to read
as set forth below, and
■ C. On page 336, remove paragraphs
(c)(27)(i)(A) and (B).
■
■
Supplement No. 2 to Part 742—AntiTerrorism Controls: North Korea, Syria
and Sudan Contract Sanctity Dates and
Related Policies
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(25) * * *
(i) A license is required for the
following telecommunications
equipment: (A) Radio relay systems or
equipment operating at a frequency
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
40494
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
equal to or greater than 19.7 GHz or
‘‘spectral efficiency’’ greater than 3 bit/
s/Hz; (B) Fiber optic systems or
equipment operating at a wavelength
greater than 1000 nm; (C)
‘‘Telecommunications transmission
systems’’ or equipment with a ‘‘digital
transfer rate’’ at the highest multiplex
level exceeding 45 Mb/s.
*
*
*
*
*
4. On page 422, in § 748.5, in
paragraph (b), add the third sentence to
read ‘‘Designation of another party to
receive the license does not alter the
responsibilities of the applicant,
licensee or exporter.’’
■ 5. On page 446, in Supplement No. 2
to part 748, in paragraph (o)(3)(i),
correct ‘‘E:2’’ to read ‘‘E:1’’.
■ 6. On page 466, in § 750.7, in
paragraph (c)(1)(ii), correct ‘‘quality’’ to
read ‘‘quantity’’ and correct ‘‘tolerance’’
to read ‘‘tolerances’’.
■ 7. On page 486, in Supplement No. 1
to part 752, in block 11, correct ‘‘SF ##’’
to read ‘‘SF #’’.
■ 8. On page 487, in Supplement No. 3
to part 752, in block 6, correct ‘‘BIS–
748P–B’’ to read ‘‘BIS–748P–A’’.
■ 9. On page 568, in Supplement No. 7
to part 760, add the fourth paragraph to
read as follows:
■
Supplement No. 7 to Part 760—
Interpretation
*
*
*
*
*
The United States person may also
provide certain services in advance of
the unilateral selection by the
boycotting country, such as the
compilation of lists of qualified
suppliers, so long as such services are
customary to the type of business the
United States person is engaged in, and
the services rendered are completely
non-exclusionary in character (i.e., the
list of qualified suppliers would have to
include the supplier whose goods had
previously been rejected by the
boycotting country, if they were fully
qualified). See § 760.2(a)(6) of this part
for a discussion of the requirements for
the provision of these services.
*
*
*
*
*
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2012–16905 Filed 7–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
29 CFR Part 1983
[Docket Number: OSHA–2010–0006]
RIN 1218–AC47
Procedures for the Handling of
Retaliation Complaints Under Section
219 of the Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act of 2008
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This document provides the
final text of regulations governing the
employee protection (whistleblower)
provisions of the Consumer Product
Safety Improvement Act of 2008
(CPSIA). An interim final rule governing
these provisions and request for public
comment was published in the Federal
Register on August 31, 2010. Three
comments were received. This rule
responds to those comments and
establishes the final procedures and
time frames for the handling of
retaliation complaints under CPSIA,
including procedures and time frames
for employee complaints to the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), investigations
by OSHA, appeals of OSHA
determinations to an administrative law
judge (ALJ) for a hearing de novo,
hearings by ALJs, review of ALJ
decisions by the Administrative Review
Board (ARB) (acting on behalf of the
Secretary of Labor), and judicial review
of the Secretary’s final decision.
DATES: This final rule is effective on July
10, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Dillon, Director, Office of the
Whistleblower Protection Program,
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–3610, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone (202) 693–2199. This is not a
toll-free number. This Federal Register
document is available in alternative
formats. The alternative formats
available are large print, electronic file
on computer disk (Word Perfect, ASCII,
Mates with Duxbury Braille System) and
audiotape.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA or the
Act), Public Law 110–314, 122 Stat.
3016, was enacted on August 14, 2008.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Section 219 of the Act, codified at 15
U.S.C. 2087, provides protection to
employees against retaliation by a
manufacturer, private labeler,
distributor, or retailer, because they
provided to their employer, the Federal
Government or the attorney general of a
state, information relating to any
violation of, or any act or omission the
employees reasonably believe to be a
violation of, any provision of an Act
enforced by the Consumer Product
Safety Commission (Commission), or
any order, rule, regulation, standard, or
ban under any such Act. The statutes
enforced by the Commission include the
Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), as
amended by the CPSIA (15 U.S.C. 2051
et seq.), the Children’s Gasoline Burn
Prevention Act (Pub. L. 110–278, 122
Stat. 2602 (2008)), the Federal
Hazardous Substances Act (15 U.S.C.
1261 et seq.), the Flammable Fabrics Act
(15 U.S.C. 1191 et seq.), the Poison
Prevention Packaging Act (15 U.S.C.
1471 et seq.), the Refrigerator Safety Act
(15 U.S.C. 1211 et seq.), and the Virginia
Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act
(15 U.S.C. 8001 et seq.). These rules
establish procedures for the handling of
whistleblower complaints under CPSIA.
II. Summary of Statutory Procedures
CPSIA’s whistleblower provisions
include procedures that allow a covered
employee to file, within 180 days of the
alleged retaliation, a complaint with the
Secretary of Labor (Secretary).1 Upon
receipt of the complaint, the Secretary
must provide written notice to the
person or persons named in the
complaint alleged to have violated the
Act (respondent) of the filing of the
complaint, the allegations contained in
the complaint, the substance of the
evidence supporting the complaint, and
the rights afforded the respondent
throughout the investigation. The
Secretary must then, within 60 days of
receipt of the complaint, afford the
complainant and respondent an
opportunity to submit a response and
meet with the investigator to present
statements from witnesses, and conduct
an investigation.
1 The regulatory provisions in this part have been
written and organized to be consistent with other
whistleblower regulations promulgated by OSHA to
the extent possible within the bounds of the
statutory language of CPSIA. Responsibility for
receiving and investigating complaints under
CPSIA also has been delegated to the Assistant
Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health
(Secretary’s Order 1–2012 (Jan. 18, 2012), 77 FR
3912 (Jan. 25, 2012)). Hearings on determinations
by the Assistant Secretary are conducted by the
Office of Administrative Law Judges, and appeals
from decisions by ALJs are decided by the ARB
(Secretary’s Order 1–2010 (Jan. 15, 2010), 75 FR
3924 (Jan. 25, 2010)).
E:\FR\FM\10JYR1.SGM
10JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40493-40494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16905]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 740, 742, 748, 750, 752, and 760
Export Administration Regulations
CFR Correction
In Title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 300 to 799,
revised as of January 1, 2012, make the following corrections:
0
1. On page 248, in Sec. 740.1, correctly revise the heading of
paragraph (d) to read ``Shippers Export Declaration or Automated Export
System Record''.
0
2. On page 321, in Sec. 742.15, move the note to introductory
paragraph (b) from under (b)(3) to its correct location above (b)(1),
and add the following note under the introductory paragraph of (b)(3):
Sec. 742.15 Encryption items.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
Note to introductory text of paragraph (b)(3): Once a mass
market classification request is accepted in SNAP-R, you may export
and reexport the encryption commodity or software under License
Exception ENC as ECCN 5A002 or 5D002, whichever is applicable, to
any end-user located or headquartered in a country listed in
supplement No. 3 to part 740 as authorized by Sec. 740.17(b) of the
EAR, while the mass market classification request is pending review
with BIS.
* * * * *
0
3. In Supplement No. 2 to part 742:
0
A. On page 332, remove paragraphs (c)(10)(i)(A) and (B), and
0
B. On page 336, add (c)(25)(i) to read as set forth below, and
0
C. On page 336, remove paragraphs (c)(27)(i)(A) and (B).
Supplement No. 2 to Part 742--Anti-Terrorism Controls: North Korea,
Syria and Sudan Contract Sanctity Dates and Related Policies
* * * * *
(c) * * *
* * * * *
(25) * * *
(i) A license is required for the following telecommunications
equipment: (A) Radio relay systems or equipment operating at a
frequency
[[Page 40494]]
equal to or greater than 19.7 GHz or ``spectral efficiency'' greater
than 3 bit/s/Hz; (B) Fiber optic systems or equipment operating at a
wavelength greater than 1000 nm; (C) ``Telecommunications transmission
systems'' or equipment with a ``digital transfer rate'' at the highest
multiplex level exceeding 45 Mb/s.
* * * * *
0
4. On page 422, in Sec. 748.5, in paragraph (b), add the third
sentence to read ``Designation of another party to receive the license
does not alter the responsibilities of the applicant, licensee or
exporter.''
0
5. On page 446, in Supplement No. 2 to part 748, in paragraph
(o)(3)(i), correct ``E:2'' to read ``E:1''.
0
6. On page 466, in Sec. 750.7, in paragraph (c)(1)(ii), correct
``quality'' to read ``quantity'' and correct ``tolerance'' to read
``tolerances''.
0
7. On page 486, in Supplement No. 1 to part 752, in block 11, correct
``SF '' to read ``SF ''.
0
8. On page 487, in Supplement No. 3 to part 752, in block 6, correct
``BIS-748P-B'' to read ``BIS-748P-A''.
0
9. On page 568, in Supplement No. 7 to part 760, add the fourth
paragraph to read as follows:
Supplement No. 7 to Part 760--Interpretation
* * * * *
The United States person may also provide certain services in
advance of the unilateral selection by the boycotting country, such as
the compilation of lists of qualified suppliers, so long as such
services are customary to the type of business the United States person
is engaged in, and the services rendered are completely non-
exclusionary in character (i.e., the list of qualified suppliers would
have to include the supplier whose goods had previously been rejected
by the boycotting country, if they were fully qualified). See Sec.
760.2(a)(6) of this part for a discussion of the requirements for the
provision of these services.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-16905 Filed 7-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
