High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act; Identification and Certification Procedures To Address Shark Conservation, 40553-40561 [2012-16838]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Secretariat at one of the addressees
shown below on or before September
10, 2012 to be considered in the
formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to FAR case 2012–018 by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching for ‘‘FAR Case 2012–018’’.
Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
that corresponds with ‘‘FAR Case 2012–
018.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘FAR Case 2012–
018’’ on your attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Hada Flowers, 1275
First Street NE., 7th Floor, Washington,
DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAR Case 2012–018, in all
correspondence related to this case. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Edward N. Chambers, Procurement
Analyst, at 202–501–3221 for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite
FAR Case 2012–018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
FAR 15.404–1(b)(2) addresses various
price analysis techniques and
procedures the Government may use to
ensure a fair and reasonable price. FAR
15.404–1(b)(2)(i) discusses the
comparison of proposed prices received
in response to a solicitation as an
example of such techniques and
procedures. In this discussion, FAR
15.404–1(b)(2)(i) references 15.403–
1(c)(1), which sets forth the
requirements of adequate price
competition. However, only 15.403–
1(c)(1)(i) actually addresses the situation
when two or more responsible offerors,
competing independently, submit
priced offers that satisfy the
Government’s expressed requirement.
Therefore, the reference in 15.404–
1(b)(2)(i) is more appropriately
identified as 15.403–1(c)(1)(i).
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(E.O.s) direct agencies to assess all costs
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect
this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because this
rule merely clarifies the reference at
FAR 15.404–1(b)(2)(i) for the use of the
price analysis technique at 15.403–
1(c)(1)(i) in order to establish a fair and
reasonable price. However, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) has
been prepared consistent with 5 U.S.C.
603, and is summarized as follows:
This rule amends the FAR at 15.404–
1(b)(2)(i) to clarify the use of the price
analysis technique at 15.403–1(c)(1)(i) in
order to establish a fair and reasonable price.
FAR 15.404–1(b)(2) addresses various price
analysis techniques and procedures the
Government may use to ensure a fair and
reasonable price. FAR 15.404–1(b)(2)(i)
discusses the comparison of proposed prices
received in response to a solicitation as an
example of such techniques and procedures.
In this discussion, FAR 15.404–1(b)(2)(i)
references 15.403–1(c)(1), which sets forth
the requirements of adequate price
competition. However, only FAR 15.403–
1(c)(1)(i) actually addresses the situation
when two or more responsible offerors,
competing independently, submit priced
offers that satisfy the Government’s
expressed requirement. Therefore, the
reference in 15.404–1(b)(2)(i) is more
appropriately identified as 15.403–1(c)(1)(i).
The proposed rule imposes no reporting,
recordkeeping, or other information
collection requirements. The rule does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules, and there are no known
significant alternatives to the rule.
The Regulatory Secretariat has
submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. A copy of the
IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat. DoD, GSA, and
NASA invite comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40553
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by this proposed rule
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610.
Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (FAR case 2012–018), in
correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain
any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 15
Government procurement.
Dated: July 3, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
propose amending 48 CFR part 15 as set
forth below:
PART 15—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 15 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
15.404–1
[Amended]
2. Amend section 15.404–1 by
removing from paragraph (b)(2)(i)
‘‘15.403–1(c)(1)’’ and adding ‘‘15.403–
1(c)(1)(i)’’ in its place.
[FR Doc. 2012–16709 Filed 7–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 110321208–1203–01]
RIN 0648–BA89
High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium
Protection Act; Identification and
Certification Procedures To Address
Shark Conservation
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This proposed action sets
forth identification and certification
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
40554
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
procedures established by the Shark
Conservation Act to address shark
conservation in areas beyond any
national jurisdiction. The objectives of
these procedures are to promote the
conservation and sustainable
management of sharks. Agency actions
and recommendations under this rule
will be in accordance with U.S.
obligations under applicable
international trade law, including the
World Trade Organization (WTO)
Agreement. This action would also
amend the definition of illegal,
unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing
for purposes of the High Seas Driftnet
Fishing Moratorium Protection Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received no later than 5 p.m. Eastern
time on August 9, 2012.
NMFS is soliciting feedback on the
proposed rule. Information and
comments concerning this proposed
rule may be submitted by any one of
several methods (see ADDRESSES).
Information related to the international
fisheries provisions of the Moratorium
Protection Act can be found on the
NMFS Web site at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/msa2007/
intlprovisions.html. NMFS will consider
all comments and information received
during the comment period in preparing
a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this
action, identified by RIN 0648–BA89,
may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Laura Cimo, Trade and
Marine Stewardship Division, Office of
International Affairs, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter N/
A in the required fields, if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Cimo, Trade and Marine
Stewardship Division, Office of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
International Affairs, NMFS, at (301)
427–8359.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 12, 2011, the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
published a final rule establishing
identification and certification
procedures to address illegal,
unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing
activities and bycatch of protected
living marine resources (PLMRs)
pursuant to the High Seas Driftnet
Fishing Moratorium Protection Act
(Moratorium Protection Act) (76 FR
2011) (50 CFR 300.200 et seq.) (16
U.S.C. 1826h–k). The identification and
certification procedures must be
amended to reflect recent statutory
amendments to the Moratorium
Protection Act. These amendments were
included in the Shark Conservation Act
(Pub. L. 111–348), which was enacted
on January 4, 2011.
Sharks present an array of challenges
for fisheries conservation and
management due to their biological
characteristics and lack of general data
reported on catch of each species. Many
shark species are characterized by
relatively slow growth, late maturity,
and low reproductive rates, which can
make them particularly vulnerable to
overexploitation and slow to recover. As
demand and exploitation rates for some
shark species, and particularly for shark
fins, have increased, concern has grown
regarding the status of many shark
stocks and the sustainability of their
exploitation in global fisheries.
The United States continues to be a
leader in promoting shark conservation
and management globally. We are
committed to working bilaterally and
multilaterally to promote shark
conservation and management, and
prevent shark finning so that legal and
sustainable fisheries are not
disadvantaged by these activities. In
particular, the United States wants to
ensure that its own import market does
not encourage unsustainable activity.
Under the amendments in the Shark
Conservation Act, the Secretary of
Commerce is required to identify a
foreign nation if: (a) the nation’s fishing
vessels are engaged or have been
engaged during the preceding calendar
year, in fishing activities or practices in
waters beyond any national jurisdiction
that target or incidentally catch sharks;
and (b) the nation has not adopted a
regulatory program for the conservation
of sharks, including measures to
prohibit removal of any of the fins of a
shark (including the tail) and discarding
of the carcass of the shark at sea, that
is comparable to that of the United
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
States, taking into account different
conditions. The amendments also call
upon the Secretary of Commerce to
begin making identifications no later
than January 4, 2012.
NMFS solicited information from the
public on activities of fishing vessels
from foreign nations engaged in shark
catch beyond any national jurisdiction
on March 24, 2011 (76 FR 16616), and
indicated that it anticipated making the
first identifications under this statute by
January 4, 2012. However, upon further
reflection and review of the statute,
NMFS proposes to begin the process of
making identifications by January 4,
2012, and publish the first
identifications in the January 2013
Biennial Report to Congress, coincident
with the next identification process
under the IUU fishing and bycatch
provisions of the Moratorium Protection
Act. This approach is consistent with
the statute and will treat all identified
nations equally. If identifications were
made in January 2012, it would have
provided potentially-affected foreign
nations only one year to become
familiar with the new shark provisions
before identification decisions were
made and only one year to take the
necessary actions to receive a positive
certification. NMFS has already started
collecting and analyzing information
that could help the agency determine
which nations may have vessels
engaging in fishing activities or
practices on the high seas that target or
incidentally catch sharks.
The Secretary of Commerce will issue
either a positive or negative certification
to each nation that is identified in the
biennial report to Congress. In the
unlikely event that the Secretary of
Commerce does not make a certification
decision, alternative certification
procedures may be applied. A positive
certification indicates that the nation
has taken the necessary actions
pursuant to the Moratorium Protection
Act. If an identified nation does not
receive a positive certification, fishing
vessels of such nation would be, to the
extent consistent with international law,
subject to the denial of entry into any
place in the United States and to the
navigable waters of the United States.
Additionally, if an identified nation
does not receive a positive certification,
the Secretary of Commerce shall so
notify the President of the United States.
This notification may include
recommendations to prohibit the
importation of certain fish and fish
products from the identified nation. The
Secretary of Commerce will recommend
to the President appropriate measures,
including trade restrictive measures, to
be taken against identified nations that
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
have not received a positive
certification, to address the fishing
activities or practices for which such
nations were identified in the biennial
report. The Secretary of Commerce will
make such recommendations on a case
by case basis in accordance with
international obligations, including the
WTO Agreement. Upon this
notification, the High Seas Driftnet
Fisheries Enforcement Act (16 U.S.C.
1826a) authorizes the President to direct
the Department of Treasury to prohibit
the importation of certain fish and fish
products from such nation.
If certain fish and fish products are
prohibited from entering the United
States, within six months after the
imposition of the prohibition, the
Secretary of Commerce shall determine
whether the prohibition is insufficient
to cause that nation to effectively
address the shark catch described in the
biennial report, or that nation has
retaliated against the United States as a
result of that prohibition. The Secretary
of Commerce shall certify to the
President each affirmative
determination that an import
prohibition is insufficient to cause a
nation to effectively address such shark
catch or that a nation has taken
retaliatory action against the United
States. This certification is deemed to be
a certification under section 1978(a) of
Title 22, which provides that the
President may direct the Secretary of the
Treasury to prohibit the bringing or the
importation into the United States of
any products from the offending country
for any duration as the President
determines appropriate and to the
extent that such prohibition is
sanctioned by the WTO.
The final rule establishing
identification and certification
procedures pursuant to the Moratorium
Protection Act (published on January
12, 2011) also set forth a definition of
IUU fishing for purposes of the
Moratorium Protection Act (50 CFR
300.201). In response to public
comments on the rule, NMFS
committed to consider amending this
regulatory definition in a subsequent
rulemaking to make any necessary
technical changes and incorporate
suggestions made by the public.
Through this action, NMFS also
proposes to amend the definition of IUU
fishing to include fishing activities that
violate shark conservation measures
required under an international fishery
management agreement to which the
United States is a party. Amendments to
the Identification and Certification
Procedures to Address Shark
Conservation.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
Pursuant to the Shark Conservation
Act, NMFS proposes to amend the
identification and certification
procedures under the Moratorium
Protection Act. This will provide for the
identification of a foreign nation if
fishing vessels of that nation are
engaged, or have been engaged during
the preceding calendar year, in fishing
activities or practices in waters beyond
any national jurisdiction that target or
incidentally catch sharks, and the
nation has not adopted a regulatory
program for the conservation of sharks,
including measures to prohibit removal
of any of the fins of a shark (including
the tail) and discard the carcass of the
shark at sea, that is comparable in
effectiveness to that of the United
States, taking into account different
conditions. When making identification
decisions, NMFS will take into account
whether the nation has adopted a
regulatory program for the conservation
and management of sharks in their
domestic waters that could have bearing
on shark conservation on the high seas.
NMFS does not intend to identify
nations, or issue a negative certification
for identified nations, on the basis of a
nation’s failure to establish a
comparable regulatory program in their
domestic waters if the regulatory
deficiency is not relevant to the nation’s
regulation of high seas shark catch.
When determining whether a nation
could potentially be identified for these
activities through the process set forth
in final regulations that were published
on January 12, 2011 (76 FR 2011),
NMFS will review, evaluate and verify
relevant information obtained from
credible sources by the agency
demonstrating that foreign-flagged
vessels engaged in fishing activities or
practices in areas beyond any national
jurisdiction that targeted or incidentally
caught sharks during the relevant
timeframe. This information could
include data gathered by the U.S.
Government as well as offered by other
nations, international organizations
(such as regional fisheries management
organizations), institutions, bilateral or
other arrangements, or nongovernmental organizations.
Corroboration of information may be
addressed through cooperation with
governments, international
organizations, non-governmental
organizations, and through use of other
credible information as appropriate.
NMFS, acting through or in consultation
with the State Department, may as
appropriate initiate bilateral discussions
with the nation whose vessels engaged
in such fishing activities to:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40555
• Communicate the provisions of the
Moratorium Protection Act to the
nation;
• Provide an opportunity for nations
to provide additional information on the
fishing activities of particular vessels;
and
• Determine if the nation has adopted
a regulatory program for the
conservation of sharks for their vessels
fishing on the high seas, including
measures to prohibit the removal of any
of the fins of a shark (including the tail)
and discard the carcass of the shark at
sea, that is comparable in effectiveness
to that of the United States, taking into
account different conditions.
When making its identification
decisions, NMFS will take into account
relevant matters, including, but not
limited to, the history, nature,
circumstances, and gravity of the fishing
activities that targeted or incidentally
caught sharks in areas beyond any
national jurisdiction. NMFS will also
take into account any actions taken by
the nation that are relevant to the
conservation and sustainable
management of sharks in areas beyond
any national jurisdiction, including:
• If the nation has adopted a
regulatory program for the conservation
of sharks;
• Participation in cooperative
research activities designed to mitigate
the impacts of fishing activities that
result in the incidental catch of sharks;
• Programs for data collection and
sharing, including programs to assess
the abundance and status of sharks and
observer programs; and
• The adoption and use of strategies,
techniques, and equipment for the
reduction and mitigation of shark
bycatch, if vessels of the nation have
shark bycatch.
If any relevant international
organization or regional fishery
management organization (RFMO) has
adopted measures for the conservation
and sustainable management of sharks,
NMFS will consider whether the nation
is a party or cooperating non-party to
the organization, and/or whether the
nation has implemented such measures.
By January 4, 2012, NMFS began the
process of making identifications of
nations whose fishing vessels engaged
in fishing activities or practices on the
high seas that target or incidentally
catch sharks and have not adopted a
regulatory program for the conservation
of sharks on the high seas, including
measures to prohibit removal of any of
the fins of the shark (including the tail)
and discard the carcass of the shark at
sea, that is comparable in effectiveness
to that of the United States, taking into
account different conditions.
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
40556
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Identifications will be published in the
biennial report to Congress, as required
by the Moratorium Protection Act. The
next biennial report is due to Congress
on January 12, 2013.
Nations will be notified of their
identification under the Moratorium
Protection Act, and NMFS, acting
through or in consultation with the
State Department, will initiate
consultations to encourage identified
nations to take the necessary actions
pursuant to the Moratorium Protection
Act.
Although the Secretary of Commerce
is authorized not to issue a certification
decision to an identified nation under
the Moratorium Protection Act, the
Secretary of Commerce will issue either
a positive or negative certification to
each identified nation, which will be
published in the subsequent biennial
report to Congress, for all nations that
are identified.
In determining whether to issue a
positive or negative certification for
each identified nation, the Secretary of
Commerce, in consultation with the
Secretary of State, will take into account
all relevant facts and circumstances,
including, but not limited to, the record
of consultations with such nation,
results of these consultations, and
actions taken by the nation and any
applicable RFMO to address the fishing
activities of concern described in the
biennial report.
To receive a positive certification, any
nation that is identified as having
fishing vessels engaged in fishing
activities or practices on the high seas
that target or incidentally catch sharks
will need to provide documentary
evidence of the adoption of a regulatory
program for the conservation of sharks
that is comparable in effectiveness to
that of the United States, taking into
account different conditions, including
conditions that could bear on the
feasibility and effectiveness of these
measures. In order to receive a positive
certification, such nation will also need
to establish a management plan that
assists in the collection of speciesspecific data.
When evaluating whether an
identified nation whose pelagic longline
vessels engaged in fishing activities or
practices on the high seas that target or
incidentally catch sharks has adopted a
regulatory program for the conservation
of sharks that is comparable in
effectiveness to that of the United
States, the proposed rule would not
require the regulatory program to
include the mandatory use of circle
hooks, as specified for nations identified
under Section 610 of the Moratorium
Protection Act, since there is scientific
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
uncertainty about the impact of circle
hook use on shark bycatch and the
United States does not require the use
of circle hooks in its fisheries to mitigate
shark bycatch.
NMFS will notify nations prior to a
formal certification determination, and
will provide such nations an
opportunity to support and/or refute
preliminary certification
determinations, and communicate
actions taken to adopt a regulatory
program for the conservation of sharks
that is comparable in effectiveness to
that of the United States, taking into
account different conditions, and
establish a management plan that assists
in the collection of species-specific data.
The Secretary of Commerce shall
consider any relevant information
received during consultations when
making its formal certification
determination.
Changes to the IUU Fishing Definition
NMFS proposes to amend the
definition of IUU fishing, consistent
with the purposes of the Moratorium
Protection Act, in order to more
comprehensively address IUU fishing,
and thus more effectively address this
serious problem that threatens the
sustainable management of the world’s
fisheries.
First, NMFS proposes to amend the
IUU fishing definition to clarify its
application to fishing activities
conducted by fishing vessels of both
party and non-party nations to
international fishery management
agreements to which the United States
is a party. The first paragraph of the
current IUU fishing definition addresses
fishing activities that violate
conservation and management measures
of an RFMO to which the United States
is a party. NMFS proposes to amend this
paragraph to clarify that it is intended
to apply to nations that are a party to the
relevant international fishery agreement.
NMFS also proposes to add a new
paragraph clarifying that, in the case of
non-parties to an international fishery
management agreement to which the
United States is a party, fishing
activities that would undermine the
conservation of the resources managed
under that agreement can be IUU
fishing.
Second, pursuant to the Shark
Conservation Act, NMFS proposes to
amend the IUU fishing definition to
explicitly include fishing activities in
violation of shark conservation
measures that are required by an RFMO
to which the United States is a party.
Third, NMFS proposes to clarify that
the IUU fishing definition applies when
a nation fails to report or fails to provide
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
accurate or complete data and
information regarding its vessels’ fishing
activities as required by an RFMO to
which the United States is a party. By
adding an explicit reference to
reporting, NMFS intends to highlight
the importance of compliance with
RFMO data collection requirements to
support effective fisheries management.
Fourth, NMFS proposes to amend the
IUU fishing definition to include fishing
activities conducted by foreign flagged
vessels in waters under U.S. jurisdiction
without authorization of the United
States. Such activities undermine the
ability of the United States to
sustainably manage its fisheries.
In determining whether to make an
IUU fishing identification, NMFS will
take into account all relevant
information, in accordance with
§ 300.202(a)(2). In addition, when
determining whether to identify a
foreign nation for having vessels
engaged in fishing activities within the
U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
without authorization of the United
States, NMFS will consider any actions
taken by the United States, the flag State
and, where relevant, the international
fishery management organization, to
address those activities, as well as the
effectiveness of such actions.
Application of IUU Fishing
Identification Criteria
In addition to the regulatory changes
identified above, NMFS is reconsidering
the manner in which it has applied
Section 609 of the Moratorium
Protection Act and its implementing
regulations. To date, NMFS has
primarily applied this Act and
implementing regulations to identify a
nation when the nation’s vessels were
engaged in illegal, unregulated, or
unreported fishing activity that was
directly attributable to specific vessel
conduct. In future identifications,
NMFS intends to identify nations based
on fishing activity that was illegal,
unreported, or unregulated because of
either the vessels’ conduct or the
nation’s actions or inactions in
managing its fisheries.
After two cycles of identification,
NMFS has determined that these
provisions could be applied more
broadly. In order to more
comprehensively address IUU fishing,
we must consider not only the
prohibited actions of fishing vessels but
also non-compliance in the form of
action or inaction at the national level
that leads to IUU fishing. To further this
goal, NMFS is proposing to identify a
nation based on the nation’s actions or
inactions that lead to fishing by vessels
registered under their flag that is not in
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
accordance with RFMO conservation
and management measures. For
example, under this approach, NMFS
could identify a nation when the nation
has failed to implement measures that
are required by an RFMO to which the
United States is a party, and as a result
the fishing vessels of that nation
operated in a manner inconsistent with
the relevant RFMO conservation and
management measures.
This approach is consistent with the
plain language of the statutory
guidelines provided in Section
609(e)(3)(A) of the Moratorium
Protection Act for the IUU fishing
definition. These statutory guidelines
specifically mention certain RFMO
conservation and management
measures, such as catch limits or quotas,
that must be implemented by nations
that are parties to the RFMO and cannot
necessarily be attributed to specific
fishing vessels. For example, RFMOs
can establish quotas for their member
nations. Each nation bears the
responsibility for implementing and
adhering to the quota it received.
Individual fishing vessels, therefore,
cannot be found in violation of the
RFMO’s quota, but action or inaction by
the flag nation could result in fishing
activity in violation of the quota. In
addition to specific situations
mentioned in the minimum statutory
guidelines for the IUU fishing
definition, there are other circumstances
in which fishing activities might violate
RFMO measures because of a nation’s
failure to govern its own fishing vessels
or carry out its own responsibilities. For
example, RFMOs require parties to
implement data reporting requirements.
In most cases, the nations, and not
individual vessels, compile and report
the requisite information to comply
with RFMO conservation and
management measures. Because many
measures are inherently a nation’s
responsibility, Congress evidently
intended NMFS to be able to identify a
nation based on its failure to fulfill the
requirements of the relevant RFMO and
the operations of the nation’s fisheries
in light of this failure.
Under the proposed approach, a
nation could be identified for fishing
activities that were illegal, unregulated,
or unreported because of national action
or inaction, including, consistent with
the examples discussed above, fishing
activities that resulted in the nation
exceeding a harvest quota granted by the
relevant RFMO because the nation
failed to implement measures to prevent
such overharvest, and fishing activities
that were not reported because the
nation failed to carry out its
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
responsibilities for reporting to ensure
collection of such information.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under
the authority of the Moratorium
Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 1826d–1826k,
as amended by the Shark Conservation
Act (Pub. L. 111–348).
This proposed rulemaking has been
determined to be significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Pursuant to section 605 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Chief
Council for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to
the Chief Council for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
In this rulemaking, NMFS proposes to
amend the identification and
certification procedures under the
Moratorium Protection Act to prevent
shark finning and to promote the
conservation and sustainable harvest of
sharks by fishing vessels of foreign
nations, as required under the Shark
Conservation Act (Pub. L. 111–348).
A description of the action, why it is
being considered, and the legal basis for
this action are contained at the
beginning of this section in the
preamble and in the SUMMARY section of
the preamble. Briefly, under the
proposed regulations, NMFS would
identify a foreign nation in a biennial
report to Congress if fishing vessels of
that nation have been engaged during
the preceding calendar year in fishing
activities or practices in waters beyond
any national jurisdiction that target or
incidentally catch sharks and the nation
has not adopted a regulatory program
for the conservation of sharks, including
measures to prohibit removal of any of
the fins of a shark (including the tail)
and discarding of the carcass of the
shark at sea, that is comparable to that
of the United States, taking into account
different conditions. The Secretary of
Commerce will issue either a positive or
negative certification to each nation that
is identified in the biennial report to
Congress. A positive certification would
demonstrate that the nation has taken
the necessary corrective action to
address the fishing activities of concern
described in the biennial report to
Congress. Nations identified for having
vessels engaged in shark catch on the
high seas that do not receive a positive
certification from the Secretary of
Commerce may be subject to measures
imposed by the Secretary of the
Treasury under the High Seas Driftnet
Fisheries Enforcement Act (16 U.S.C.
1826a). Such measures include the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40557
denial of port privileges of fishing
vessels of those nations, and, as directed
by the President, prohibition on the
importation into the United States of
certain fish and fish products caught by
the vessels engaged in the relevant
activity for which the nations were
identified, or other measures.
To receive a positive certification, any
nation that is identified as having
fishing vessels engaged in fishing
activities or practices on the high seas
that target or incidentally catch sharks
will need to provide documentary
evidence of the adoption of a regulatory
program for the conservation of sharks
that is comparable in effectiveness to
that of the United States, taking into
account different conditions, including
conditions that could bear on the
feasibility and effectiveness of
measures. Prior to being issued a
positive certification, such nation will
also need to establish a management
plan that assists in the collection of
species-specific data in order to receive
a positive certification.
Because the proposed regulations are
purely procedural in nature, and only
set out how NMFS is to make decisions
regarding certifications for nations that
have been identified in the biennial
report to Congress, there are no direct
economic impacts on small or large
entities. Therefore, the proposed
regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities and do not
need to be analyzed under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. As a result,
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required and none has been
prepared.
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
for §§ 300.206(b)(2), 300.207(c), and
300.208(c) subject to review and
approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA). The collection-ofinformation requirements have been
provided to OMB.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and
procedure, Antarctica, Canada, Exports,
Fish, Fisheries, Fishing, Imports,
Indians, Labeling, Marine resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Russian Federation,
Transportation, Treaties, Wildlife.
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
40558
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Dated: July 5, 2012.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
performing the functions and duties of the
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
marine resources, and achieve shark
conservation.
3. In § 300.201, the definition of
‘‘Illegal, unreported, or unregulated
(IUU) fishing’’ is revised to read as
follows:
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 300 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
§ 300.201
PART 300—INTERNATIONAL
FISHERIES REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Moratorium Protection Act, 16
U.S.C. 1826d–1826k
2. Section 300.200 is revised to read
as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 300.200
Purpose and scope.
The purpose of this subpart is to
implement the requirements in the High
Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium
Protection Act (‘‘Moratorium Protection
Act’’) to identify and certify nations
whose vessels engaged in illegal,
unreported, or unregulated fishing;
whose fishing activities result in
bycatch of protected living marine
resources; or whose vessels engaged in
fishing activities or practices on the
high seas that target or incidentally
catch sharks where the nation has not
adopted a regulatory program for the
conservation of sharks, comparable in
effectiveness to that of the United
States, taking into account different
conditions. This language applies to
vessels entitled to fly the flag of the
nation in question. Where the Secretary
of Commerce determines that an
identified nation has not taken the
necessary actions to warrant receipt of
a positive certification, the Secretary of
Commerce may recommend to the
President that the United States prohibit
the importation of certain fish and fish
products from the identified nation or
other measures. The Secretary of
Commerce will recommend to the
President appropriate measures,
including trade restrictive measures, to
be taken against identified nations that
have not received a positive
certification, to address the fishing
activities or practices for which such
nations were identified in the biennial
report. The Secretary of Commerce will
make such a recommendation on a caseby-case basis in accordance with
international obligations, including the
WTO Agreement. The Moratorium
Protection Act also authorizes
cooperation and assistance to nations to
take action to combat illegal,
unreported, or unregulated fishing,
reduce bycatch of protected living
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Illegal, unreported, or unregulated
(IUU) fishing means:
(1) In the case of parties to an
international fishery management
agreement to which the United States is
a party, fishing activities that violate
conservation and management measures
required under an international fishery
management agreement to which the
United States is a party, including but
not limited to catch limits or quotas,
capacity restrictions, bycatch reduction
requirements, shark conservation
measures, and data reporting;
(2) In the case of non-parties to an
international fishery management
agreement to which the United States is
a party, fishing activities that would
undermine the conservation of the
resources managed under that
agreement;
(3) Overfishing of fish stocks shared
by the United States, for which there are
no applicable international conservation
or management measures, or in areas
with no applicable international fishery
management organization or agreement,
that has adverse impacts on such stocks;
or,
(4) Fishing activity that has a
significant adverse impact on
seamounts, hydrothermal vents, cold
water corals and other vulnerable
marine ecosystems located beyond any
national jurisdiction, for which there are
no applicable conservation or
management measures or in areas with
no applicable international fishery
management organization or agreement.
(5) Fishing activities by foreign
flagged vessels in U.S. waters without
authorization of the United States.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 300.202, paragraphs (a)(2) and
(d)(1) are revised to read as follows:
§ 300.202 Identification and certification of
nations engaged in illegal, unreported, or
unregulated fishing activities.
(a) * * *
(2) When determining whether to
identify a nation as having fishing
vessels engaged in IUU fishing, NMFS
will take into account all relevant
matters, including but not limited to the
history, nature, circumstances, extent,
duration, and gravity of the IUU fishing
activity in question, and any measures
that the nation has implemented to
address the IUU fishing activity. NMFS
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
will also take into account whether an
international fishery management
organization exists with a mandate to
regulate the fishery in which the IUU
activity in question takes place. If such
an organization exists, NMFS will
consider whether the relevant
international fishery management
organization has adopted measures that
are effective at addressing the IUU
fishing activity in question and, if the
nation whose fishing vessels are
engaged, or have been engaged, in IUU
fishing is a party to, or maintains
cooperating status with, the
organization. NMFS will also take into
account any actions taken or on-going
proceedings by the United States and/or
flag State to address the IUU fishing
activity of concern as well as the
effectiveness of such actions.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) The Secretary of Commerce shall
issue a positive certification to an
identified nation upon making a
determination that such nation has
taken appropriate corrective action to
address the activities for which such
nation has been identified in the
biennial report to Congress. When
making such determination, the
Secretary shall take into account the
following:
(i) Whether the government of the
nation identified pursuant to paragraph
(a) of this section has provided evidence
documenting that it has taken corrective
action to address the IUU fishing
activity described in the biennial report;
(ii) Whether the relevant international
fishery management organization has
adopted and, if applicable, the
identified member nation has
implemented and is enforcing, measures
to effectively address the IUU fishing
activity of the identified nation’s fishing
vessels described in the biennial report;
(iii) Whether the United States has
taken enforcement action to effectively
address the IUU fishing activity of the
identified nation described in the
biennial report; and
(iv) Whether the identified nation has
cooperated in any action taken by the
United States to address the IUU fishing
activity described in the biennial report.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 300.203
[Amended]
5. In Section 300.203, paragraphs
(a)(1), (a)(2), and (c)(1) are revised;
paragraph (c)(2) is redesignated as
paragraph (c)(3), and a new paragraph
(c)(2) is added to read as follows:
(a) * * *
(1) NMFS will identify and list, in the
biennial report to Congress nations—
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(i) whose fishing vessels are engaged,
or have been engaged during the
preceding calendar year prior to
publication of the biennial report to
Congress, in fishing activities or
practices either in waters beyond any
national jurisdiction that result in
bycatch of a PLMR, or in waters beyond
the U.S. EEZ that result in bycatch of a
PLMR that is shared by the United
States;
(ii) if the nation is a party to or
maintains cooperating status with the
relevant international organization with
jurisdiction over the conservation and
protection of the relevant PLMRs, or a
relevant international or regional fishery
organization, and the organization has
not adopted measures to effectively end
or reduce bycatch of such species; and
(iii) the nation has not implemented
measures designed to end or reduce
such bycatch that are comparable in
effectiveness to U.S. regulatory
requirements, taking into account
different conditions that could bear on
the feasibility and efficacy of
comparable measures.
(2) When determining whether to
identify nations as having fishing
vessels engaged in PLMR bycatch,
NMFS will take into account all relevant
matters including, but not limited to,
the history, nature, circumstances,
extent, duration, and gravity of the
bycatch activity in question.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Initiate consultations within 60
days after submission of the biennial
report to Congress with the governments
of identified nations for the purposes of
encouraging adoption of a regulatory
program for protected living marine
resources that is comparable in
effectiveness to that of the United
States, taking into account different
conditions, and establishment of a
management plan that assists in the
collection of species—specific data;
(2) Seek to enter into bilateral and
multilateral treaties with such nations to
protect the PLMRs from bycatch
activities described in the biennial
report; and
*
*
*
*
*
6. Section 300.204 is redesignated as
§ 300.205 and a new § 300.204 is added
to read as follows:
§ 300.204 Identification and certification of
nations whose vessels engaged in shark
catch.
(a) Procedures to identify nations if
fishing vessels of that nation are
engaged in fishing activities or practices
in waters beyond any national
jurisdiction that target or incidentally
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
catch sharks during the preceding
calendar year.—
(1) NMFS will identify and list in the
biennial report to Congress nations—
(i) whose fishing vessels are engaged,
or have been engaged during the
calendar year prior to publication of the
biennial report to Congress, in fishing
activities or practices in waters beyond
any national jurisdiction that target or
incidentally catch sharks; and
(ii) where that nation has not adopted
a regulatory program to provide for the
conservation of sharks, including
measures to prohibit removal of any of
the fins of a shark (including the tail)
and discard the carcass of the shark at
sea, that is comparable in effectiveness
to that of the United States, taking into
account different conditions, including
conditions that could bear on the
feasibility and effectiveness of
measures.
(2) When determining whether to
identify nations for these activities,
NMFS will take into account all relevant
matters including, but not limited to,
the history, nature, circumstances,
duration, and gravity of the fishing
activity of concern.
(b) Notification of nations identified
as having fishing vessels engaged in
fishing activities or practices that target
or incidentally catch sharks. Upon
identifying in the biennial report to
Congress a nation whose vessels
engaged in fishing activities or practices
in waters beyond any national
jurisdiction that target or incidentally
catch sharks, the Secretary of Commerce
will notify the President of such
identification. Within 60 days after
submission of the biennial report to
Congress, the Secretary of Commerce,
acting through or in consultation with
the Secretary of State, will notify
identified nations about the
requirements under the Moratorium
Protection Act and this subpart N.
(c) Consultations and negotiations.
Upon submission of the biennial report
to Congress, the Secretary of Commerce,
acting through or in consultation with
the Secretary of State, will:
(1) Initiate consultations within 60
days after submission of the biennial
report to Congress with the governments
of identified nations for the purposes of
encouraging adoption of a regulatory
program for the conservation of sharks
that is comparable in effectiveness to
that of the United States, taking into
account different conditions, and
establishment of a management plan
that assists in the collection of speciesspecific data;
(2) Seek to enter into bilateral and
multilateral treaties or other
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40559
arrangements with such nations to
protect sharks; and
(3) Seek agreements through the
appropriate international organizations
calling for international restrictions on
the fishing activities or practices
described in the biennial report and, as
necessary, request the Secretary of State
to initiate the amendment of any
existing international treaty to which
the United States is a party for the
conservation of sharks to make such
agreements consistent with this subpart.
(d) International Cooperation and
Assistance. To the greatest extent
possible, consistent with existing
authority and the availability of funds,
the Secretary shall:
(1) Provide appropriate assistance to
nations identified by the Secretary
under paragraph (a) of this section and
international organizations of which
those nations are members to assist
those nations in qualifying for a positive
certification under paragraph (e) of this
section;
(2) Undertake, where appropriate,
cooperative research activities on
species assessments and harvesting
techniques aimed at mitigating or
eliminating the non-target catch of
sharks, with those nations or
organizations;
(3) Encourage and facilitate the
transfer of appropriate technology to
those nations or organizations to assist
those nations in qualifying for positive
certification under paragraph (e) of this
section; and
(4) Provide assistance to those nations
or organizations in designing,
implementing, and enforcing
appropriate fish harvesting plans for the
conservation and sustainable
management of sharks.
(e) Procedures to certify nations
identified as having fishing vessels
engaged in fishing activities or practices
that target or incidentally catch
sharks.—Each nation that is identified
as having fishing vessels engaged in
fishing activities or practices in waters
beyond any national jurisdiction that
target or incidentally catch sharks and
has not adopted a regulatory program
for the conservation of sharks, including
measures to prohibit removal of any of
the fins of a shark (including the tail)
and discard the carcass of the shark at
sea, that is comparable to that of the
United States, taking into account
different conditions, shall receive either
a positive or a negative certification
from the Secretary of Commerce. This
certification will be published in the
biennial report to Congress. The
Secretary of Commerce shall issue a
positive certification to an identified
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
40560
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
nation upon making a determination
that:
(1) Such nation has provided
evidence documenting its adoption of a
regulatory program for the conservation
of sharks that is comparable in
effectiveness to regulatory measures
required under U.S. law in the relevant
fisheries, taking into account different
conditions, including conditions that
could bear on the feasibility and
effectiveness of measures; and (ii) Such
nation has established a management
plan that will assist in the collection of
species-specific data on sharks to
support international stock assessments
and conservation efforts for sharks.
(2) Prior to a formal certification
determination, nations will be provided
with preliminary certification
determinations, and an opportunity to
support and/or refute the preliminary
determinations, and communicate
actions taken to adopt a regulatory
program that is comparable in
effectiveness to that of the United
States, taking into account different
conditions. The Secretary of Commerce
shall consider any relevant information
received during consultations when
making its formal certification
determination.
*
*
*
*
*
7. Newly redesignated § 300.205 is
revised to read as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 300.205
Effect of certification.
(a) If a nation identified under
§ 300.202(a), § 300.203(a), or
§ 300.204(a) does not receive a positive
certification under this subpart (i.e., the
nation receives a negative certification
or no certification is made), the fishing
vessels of such nation are, to the extent
consistent with international law,
subject to the denial of entry by the
Secretary of the Treasury into any place
in the United States and to the navigable
waters of the United States.
(b) Upon notification and any
recommendations by the Secretary of
Commerce to the President that an
identified nation has failed to receive a
positive certification, the President is
authorized to direct the Secretary of the
Treasury to prohibit the importation of
certain fish and fish products from such
nation (see § 300.206).
(c) Any action recommended under
paragraph (b) shall be consistent with
international obligations, including the
WTO Agreement.
(d) If certain fish and fish products are
prohibited from entering the United
States, within six months after the
imposition of the prohibition, the
Secretary of Commerce shall determine
whether the prohibition is insufficient
to cause that nation to effectively
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
address the IUU fishing, bycatch, or
shark catch described in the biennial
report, or that nation has retaliated
against the United States as a result of
that prohibition. The Secretary of
Commerce shall certify to the President
each affirmative determination that an
import prohibition is insufficient to
cause a nation to effectively address
such IUU fishing activity, bycatch, or
shark catch or that a nation has taken
retaliatory action against the United
States. This certification is deemed to be
a certification under section 1978(a) of
Title 22, which provides that the
President may direct the Secretary of the
Treasury to prohibit the bringing or the
importation into the United States of
any products from the offending country
for any duration as the President
determines appropriate and to the
extent that such prohibition is
sanctioned by the World Trade
Organization.
(e) Duration of certification. Any
nation identified in the biennial report
to Congress for having vessels engaged
in IUU fishing that is negatively
certified will remain negatively certified
until the Secretary of Commerce
determines that the nation has taken
appropriate corrective action to address
the IUU fishing activities for which it
was identified in the biennial report.
Any nation identified in the biennial
report to Congress for having vessels
engaged in PLMR bycatch or catch of
sharks that is negatively certified will
remain negatively certified until the
Secretary of Commerce determines that
the nation has taken the necessary
actions pursuant to the Moratorium
Protection Act to receive a positive
certification.
(f) Consultations. NMFS will, working
through or in consultation with the
Department of State, continue
consultations with nations that do not
receive a positive certification with
respect to the fishing activities
described in the biennial report to
Congress. The Secretary of Commerce
shall take the results of such
consultations into consideration when
making a subsequent certification
determination for each such nation.
8. Redesignate § 300.205 as § 300.206,
and in newly redesignated § 300.206,
revise paragraphs (a) and (b)(4) to read
as follows:
§ 300.206 Denial of port privileges and
import restrictions on fish or fish products.
(a) * * *
(1) Vessels from a nation identified in
the biennial report under § 300.202(a),
§ 300.203(a), or § 300.204(a) and not
positively certified by the Secretary of
Commerce that enter any place in the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
United States or the navigable waters of
the United States remain subject to
inspection and may be prohibited from
landing, processing, or transshipping
fish and fish products, under applicable
law. Services, including the refueling
and re-supplying of such fishing vessels,
may be prohibited, with the exception
of services essential to the safety, health,
and welfare of the crew. Fishing vessels
will not be denied port access or
services in cases of force majeure or
distress.
(2) For nations identified in the
previous biennial report under
§ 300.202(a) that are not positively
certified in the current biennial report,
the Secretary of Commerce shall so
notify and make recommendations to
the President, who is authorized to
direct the Secretary of the Treasury to
impose import prohibitions with respect
to fish and fish products from those
nations. Such a recommendation would
address the relevant fishing activities or
practices for which such nations were
identified in the biennial report. Such
import prohibitions, if implemented,
would apply to fish and fish products
managed under an applicable
international fishery agreement. If there
is no applicable international fishery
agreement, such prohibitions, if
implemented, would only apply to fish
and fish products caught by vessels
engaged in illegal, unreported, or
unregulated fishing. For nations
identified under § 300.203(a) or
§ 300.204(a) that are not positively
certified, the Secretary of Commerce
shall so notify and make
recommendations to the President, who
is authorized to direct the Secretary of
the Treasury to impose import
prohibitions with respect to fish and
fish products from those nations; such
prohibitions would only apply to fish
and fish products caught by the vessels
engaged in the relevant activity for
which the nation was identified.
(3) Any action recommended under
paragraph (a)(2) shall be consistent with
international obligations, including the
WTO Agreement.
(b) * * *
(4) Removal of negative certifications
and import restrictions. Upon a
determination by the Secretary of
Commerce that an identified nation that
was not certified positively has
satisfactorily met the conditions in this
subpart and that nation has been
positively certified, the provisions of
§ 300.206 shall no longer apply. The
Secretary of Commerce, with the
concurrence of the Secretary of State
and in cooperation with the Secretary of
the Treasury, will notify such nations
and will file with the Office of the
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Federal Register for publication
notification of the removal of the import
restrictions effective on the date of
publication.
9. Redesignate § 300.206 as § 300.207,
and in newly redesignated § 300.207,
revise the section heading, and
paragraph (c), and add paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
§ 300.207 Alternative procedures for
nations identified as having vessels
engaged in IUU fishing activities that are
not certified under § 300.202
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Fish and fish products offered for
entry under this section must be
accompanied by a completed
documentation of admissibility
available from NMFS. The
documentation of admissibility must be
executed by a duly authorized official of
the identified nation and must be
validated by a responsible official(s)
designated by NMFS. The
documentation must be executed and
submitted in a format (electronic
facsimile (fax), the Internet, etc.)
specified by NMFS.
(d) Any action recommended under
this section shall be consistent with
international obligations, including the
WTO Agreement.
10. Redesignate § 300.207 as
§ 300.208, and in newly redesignated
§ 300.208, revise the section heading
and add paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 300.208 Alternative procedures for
nations identified as having vessels
engaged in bycatch of PLMRs that are not
certified under § 300.203.
(d) Any action recommended under
this section shall be consistent with
international obligations, including the
WTO Agreement.
11. Add new § 300.209 to read as
follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 300.209 Alternative procedures for
nations identified as having vessels
engaged in shark catch that are not certified
under § 300.204.
(a) These certification procedures may
be applied to fish and fish products
from a vessel of a harvesting nation that
has been identified under § 300.204 in
the event that the Secretary cannot
reach a certification determination for
that nation by the time of the next
biennial report. These procedures shall
not apply to fish and fish products from
identified nations that have received
either a negative or a positive
certification under this subpart.
(b) Consistent with paragraph (a) of
this section, the Secretary of Commerce
may allow entry of fish and fish
products on a shipment-by-shipment,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
shipper-by-shipper, or other basis if the
Secretary determines that imports were
harvested by fishing activities or
practices that do not target or
incidentally catch sharks, or were
harvested by practices that—
(1) Are comparable to those of the
United States, taking into account
different conditions; and
(2) Include the gathering of species
specific shark data that can be used to
support international and regional
assessments and conservation efforts for
sharks.
(c) Fish and fish products offered for
entry under this section must be
accompanied by a completed
documentation of admissibility
available from NMFS. The
documentation of admissibility must be
executed by a duly authorized official of
the identified nation and validated by a
responsible official(s) designated by
NMFS. The documentation must be
executed and submitted in a format
(electronic facsimile (fax), the Internet,
etc.) specified by NMFS.
(d) Any action recommended under
this section shall be consistent with
international obligations, including the
WTO Agreement.
[FR Doc. 2012–16838 Filed 7–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
RIN 0648–BB72
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico;
Amendment 34
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
The Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council (Council) has
submitted Amendment 34 to the Fishery
Management Plan for the Reef Fish
Resources of the Gulf of Mexico (FMP)
for review, approval, and
implementation by NMFS. Amendment
34 proposes to modify the income
qualification requirements for the
renewal of Gulf of Mexico (Gulf)
commercial reef fish permits and revise
the crew size regulations for dualpermitted vessels (i.e. vessels that
possess both a charter vessel/headboat
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40561
permit for Gulf reef fish and a
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish) while fishing commercially. The
intent of Amendment 34 is to remove
permit requirements that may no longer
be applicable to current commercial
fishing practices and to improve vessel
safety in the Gulf reef fish fishery.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before September 10,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the amendment identified by
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2011–0025’’ by any of
the following methods:
• Electronic submissions: Submit
electronic comments via the Federal
e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Steve Branstetter, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
To submit comments through the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, enter ‘‘NOAA–
NMFS–2011–0025’’ in the search field
and click on ‘‘search’’. After you locate
the proposed rule, click the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ link in that row. This will
display the comment Web form. You
can enter your submitter information
(unless you prefer to remain
anonymous), and type your comment on
the Web form. You can also attach
additional files (up to 10 MB) in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
Comments received through means
not specified in this rule will not be
considered.
For further assistance with submitting
a comment, see the ‘‘Commenting’’
section at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!faqs or the Help section at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Electronic copies of Amendment 34,
which includes an environmental
assessment and a regulatory impact
review, may be obtained from the
Southeast Regional Office Web site at
https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sf/
GrouperSnapperandReefFish.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Branstetter, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, telephone 727–824–5305;
email: Steve.Branstetter@noaa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40553-40561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16838]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 110321208-1203-01]
RIN 0648-BA89
High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act;
Identification and Certification Procedures To Address Shark
Conservation
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed action sets forth identification and
certification
[[Page 40554]]
procedures established by the Shark Conservation Act to address shark
conservation in areas beyond any national jurisdiction. The objectives
of these procedures are to promote the conservation and sustainable
management of sharks. Agency actions and recommendations under this
rule will be in accordance with U.S. obligations under applicable
international trade law, including the World Trade Organization (WTO)
Agreement. This action would also amend the definition of illegal,
unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing for purposes of the High Seas
Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act.
DATES: Written comments must be received no later than 5 p.m. Eastern
time on August 9, 2012.
NMFS is soliciting feedback on the proposed rule. Information and
comments concerning this proposed rule may be submitted by any one of
several methods (see ADDRESSES). Information related to the
international fisheries provisions of the Moratorium Protection Act can
be found on the NMFS Web site at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/msa2007/intlprovisions.html. NMFS will consider all comments and information
received during the comment period in preparing a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action, identified by RIN 0648-
BA89, may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Laura Cimo, Trade and Marine Stewardship Division,
Office of International Affairs, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All personal identifying information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required fields, if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted
in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Cimo, Trade and Marine
Stewardship Division, Office of International Affairs, NMFS, at (301)
427-8359.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 12, 2011, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
published a final rule establishing identification and certification
procedures to address illegal, unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing
activities and bycatch of protected living marine resources (PLMRs)
pursuant to the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act
(Moratorium Protection Act) (76 FR 2011) (50 CFR 300.200 et seq.) (16
U.S.C. 1826h-k). The identification and certification procedures must
be amended to reflect recent statutory amendments to the Moratorium
Protection Act. These amendments were included in the Shark
Conservation Act (Pub. L. 111-348), which was enacted on January 4,
2011.
Sharks present an array of challenges for fisheries conservation
and management due to their biological characteristics and lack of
general data reported on catch of each species. Many shark species are
characterized by relatively slow growth, late maturity, and low
reproductive rates, which can make them particularly vulnerable to
overexploitation and slow to recover. As demand and exploitation rates
for some shark species, and particularly for shark fins, have
increased, concern has grown regarding the status of many shark stocks
and the sustainability of their exploitation in global fisheries.
The United States continues to be a leader in promoting shark
conservation and management globally. We are committed to working
bilaterally and multilaterally to promote shark conservation and
management, and prevent shark finning so that legal and sustainable
fisheries are not disadvantaged by these activities. In particular, the
United States wants to ensure that its own import market does not
encourage unsustainable activity.
Under the amendments in the Shark Conservation Act, the Secretary
of Commerce is required to identify a foreign nation if: (a) the
nation's fishing vessels are engaged or have been engaged during the
preceding calendar year, in fishing activities or practices in waters
beyond any national jurisdiction that target or incidentally catch
sharks; and (b) the nation has not adopted a regulatory program for the
conservation of sharks, including measures to prohibit removal of any
of the fins of a shark (including the tail) and discarding of the
carcass of the shark at sea, that is comparable to that of the United
States, taking into account different conditions. The amendments also
call upon the Secretary of Commerce to begin making identifications no
later than January 4, 2012.
NMFS solicited information from the public on activities of fishing
vessels from foreign nations engaged in shark catch beyond any national
jurisdiction on March 24, 2011 (76 FR 16616), and indicated that it
anticipated making the first identifications under this statute by
January 4, 2012. However, upon further reflection and review of the
statute, NMFS proposes to begin the process of making identifications
by January 4, 2012, and publish the first identifications in the
January 2013 Biennial Report to Congress, coincident with the next
identification process under the IUU fishing and bycatch provisions of
the Moratorium Protection Act. This approach is consistent with the
statute and will treat all identified nations equally. If
identifications were made in January 2012, it would have provided
potentially-affected foreign nations only one year to become familiar
with the new shark provisions before identification decisions were made
and only one year to take the necessary actions to receive a positive
certification. NMFS has already started collecting and analyzing
information that could help the agency determine which nations may have
vessels engaging in fishing activities or practices on the high seas
that target or incidentally catch sharks.
The Secretary of Commerce will issue either a positive or negative
certification to each nation that is identified in the biennial report
to Congress. In the unlikely event that the Secretary of Commerce does
not make a certification decision, alternative certification procedures
may be applied. A positive certification indicates that the nation has
taken the necessary actions pursuant to the Moratorium Protection Act.
If an identified nation does not receive a positive certification,
fishing vessels of such nation would be, to the extent consistent with
international law, subject to the denial of entry into any place in the
United States and to the navigable waters of the United States.
Additionally, if an identified nation does not receive a positive
certification, the Secretary of Commerce shall so notify the President
of the United States. This notification may include recommendations to
prohibit the importation of certain fish and fish products from the
identified nation. The Secretary of Commerce will recommend to the
President appropriate measures, including trade restrictive measures,
to be taken against identified nations that
[[Page 40555]]
have not received a positive certification, to address the fishing
activities or practices for which such nations were identified in the
biennial report. The Secretary of Commerce will make such
recommendations on a case by case basis in accordance with
international obligations, including the WTO Agreement. Upon this
notification, the High Seas Driftnet Fisheries Enforcement Act (16
U.S.C. 1826a) authorizes the President to direct the Department of
Treasury to prohibit the importation of certain fish and fish products
from such nation.
If certain fish and fish products are prohibited from entering the
United States, within six months after the imposition of the
prohibition, the Secretary of Commerce shall determine whether the
prohibition is insufficient to cause that nation to effectively address
the shark catch described in the biennial report, or that nation has
retaliated against the United States as a result of that prohibition.
The Secretary of Commerce shall certify to the President each
affirmative determination that an import prohibition is insufficient to
cause a nation to effectively address such shark catch or that a nation
has taken retaliatory action against the United States. This
certification is deemed to be a certification under section 1978(a) of
Title 22, which provides that the President may direct the Secretary of
the Treasury to prohibit the bringing or the importation into the
United States of any products from the offending country for any
duration as the President determines appropriate and to the extent that
such prohibition is sanctioned by the WTO.
The final rule establishing identification and certification
procedures pursuant to the Moratorium Protection Act (published on
January 12, 2011) also set forth a definition of IUU fishing for
purposes of the Moratorium Protection Act (50 CFR 300.201). In response
to public comments on the rule, NMFS committed to consider amending
this regulatory definition in a subsequent rulemaking to make any
necessary technical changes and incorporate suggestions made by the
public. Through this action, NMFS also proposes to amend the definition
of IUU fishing to include fishing activities that violate shark
conservation measures required under an international fishery
management agreement to which the United States is a party. Amendments
to the Identification and Certification Procedures to Address Shark
Conservation.
Pursuant to the Shark Conservation Act, NMFS proposes to amend the
identification and certification procedures under the Moratorium
Protection Act. This will provide for the identification of a foreign
nation if fishing vessels of that nation are engaged, or have been
engaged during the preceding calendar year, in fishing activities or
practices in waters beyond any national jurisdiction that target or
incidentally catch sharks, and the nation has not adopted a regulatory
program for the conservation of sharks, including measures to prohibit
removal of any of the fins of a shark (including the tail) and discard
the carcass of the shark at sea, that is comparable in effectiveness to
that of the United States, taking into account different conditions.
When making identification decisions, NMFS will take into account
whether the nation has adopted a regulatory program for the
conservation and management of sharks in their domestic waters that
could have bearing on shark conservation on the high seas. NMFS does
not intend to identify nations, or issue a negative certification for
identified nations, on the basis of a nation's failure to establish a
comparable regulatory program in their domestic waters if the
regulatory deficiency is not relevant to the nation's regulation of
high seas shark catch. When determining whether a nation could
potentially be identified for these activities through the process set
forth in final regulations that were published on January 12, 2011 (76
FR 2011), NMFS will review, evaluate and verify relevant information
obtained from credible sources by the agency demonstrating that
foreign-flagged vessels engaged in fishing activities or practices in
areas beyond any national jurisdiction that targeted or incidentally
caught sharks during the relevant timeframe. This information could
include data gathered by the U.S. Government as well as offered by
other nations, international organizations (such as regional fisheries
management organizations), institutions, bilateral or other
arrangements, or non-governmental organizations.
Corroboration of information may be addressed through cooperation
with governments, international organizations, non-governmental
organizations, and through use of other credible information as
appropriate. NMFS, acting through or in consultation with the State
Department, may as appropriate initiate bilateral discussions with the
nation whose vessels engaged in such fishing activities to:
Communicate the provisions of the Moratorium Protection
Act to the nation;
Provide an opportunity for nations to provide additional
information on the fishing activities of particular vessels; and
Determine if the nation has adopted a regulatory program
for the conservation of sharks for their vessels fishing on the high
seas, including measures to prohibit the removal of any of the fins of
a shark (including the tail) and discard the carcass of the shark at
sea, that is comparable in effectiveness to that of the United States,
taking into account different conditions.
When making its identification decisions, NMFS will take into
account relevant matters, including, but not limited to, the history,
nature, circumstances, and gravity of the fishing activities that
targeted or incidentally caught sharks in areas beyond any national
jurisdiction. NMFS will also take into account any actions taken by the
nation that are relevant to the conservation and sustainable management
of sharks in areas beyond any national jurisdiction, including:
If the nation has adopted a regulatory program for the
conservation of sharks;
Participation in cooperative research activities designed
to mitigate the impacts of fishing activities that result in the
incidental catch of sharks;
Programs for data collection and sharing, including
programs to assess the abundance and status of sharks and observer
programs; and
The adoption and use of strategies, techniques, and
equipment for the reduction and mitigation of shark bycatch, if vessels
of the nation have shark bycatch.
If any relevant international organization or regional fishery
management organization (RFMO) has adopted measures for the
conservation and sustainable management of sharks, NMFS will consider
whether the nation is a party or cooperating non-party to the
organization, and/or whether the nation has implemented such measures.
By January 4, 2012, NMFS began the process of making
identifications of nations whose fishing vessels engaged in fishing
activities or practices on the high seas that target or incidentally
catch sharks and have not adopted a regulatory program for the
conservation of sharks on the high seas, including measures to prohibit
removal of any of the fins of the shark (including the tail) and
discard the carcass of the shark at sea, that is comparable in
effectiveness to that of the United States, taking into account
different conditions.
[[Page 40556]]
Identifications will be published in the biennial report to Congress,
as required by the Moratorium Protection Act. The next biennial report
is due to Congress on January 12, 2013.
Nations will be notified of their identification under the
Moratorium Protection Act, and NMFS, acting through or in consultation
with the State Department, will initiate consultations to encourage
identified nations to take the necessary actions pursuant to the
Moratorium Protection Act.
Although the Secretary of Commerce is authorized not to issue a
certification decision to an identified nation under the Moratorium
Protection Act, the Secretary of Commerce will issue either a positive
or negative certification to each identified nation, which will be
published in the subsequent biennial report to Congress, for all
nations that are identified.
In determining whether to issue a positive or negative
certification for each identified nation, the Secretary of Commerce, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, will take into account all
relevant facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, the
record of consultations with such nation, results of these
consultations, and actions taken by the nation and any applicable RFMO
to address the fishing activities of concern described in the biennial
report.
To receive a positive certification, any nation that is identified
as having fishing vessels engaged in fishing activities or practices on
the high seas that target or incidentally catch sharks will need to
provide documentary evidence of the adoption of a regulatory program
for the conservation of sharks that is comparable in effectiveness to
that of the United States, taking into account different conditions,
including conditions that could bear on the feasibility and
effectiveness of these measures. In order to receive a positive
certification, such nation will also need to establish a management
plan that assists in the collection of species-specific data.
When evaluating whether an identified nation whose pelagic longline
vessels engaged in fishing activities or practices on the high seas
that target or incidentally catch sharks has adopted a regulatory
program for the conservation of sharks that is comparable in
effectiveness to that of the United States, the proposed rule would not
require the regulatory program to include the mandatory use of circle
hooks, as specified for nations identified under Section 610 of the
Moratorium Protection Act, since there is scientific uncertainty about
the impact of circle hook use on shark bycatch and the United States
does not require the use of circle hooks in its fisheries to mitigate
shark bycatch.
NMFS will notify nations prior to a formal certification
determination, and will provide such nations an opportunity to support
and/or refute preliminary certification determinations, and communicate
actions taken to adopt a regulatory program for the conservation of
sharks that is comparable in effectiveness to that of the United
States, taking into account different conditions, and establish a
management plan that assists in the collection of species-specific
data. The Secretary of Commerce shall consider any relevant information
received during consultations when making its formal certification
determination.
Changes to the IUU Fishing Definition
NMFS proposes to amend the definition of IUU fishing, consistent
with the purposes of the Moratorium Protection Act, in order to more
comprehensively address IUU fishing, and thus more effectively address
this serious problem that threatens the sustainable management of the
world's fisheries.
First, NMFS proposes to amend the IUU fishing definition to clarify
its application to fishing activities conducted by fishing vessels of
both party and non-party nations to international fishery management
agreements to which the United States is a party. The first paragraph
of the current IUU fishing definition addresses fishing activities that
violate conservation and management measures of an RFMO to which the
United States is a party. NMFS proposes to amend this paragraph to
clarify that it is intended to apply to nations that are a party to the
relevant international fishery agreement. NMFS also proposes to add a
new paragraph clarifying that, in the case of non-parties to an
international fishery management agreement to which the United States
is a party, fishing activities that would undermine the conservation of
the resources managed under that agreement can be IUU fishing.
Second, pursuant to the Shark Conservation Act, NMFS proposes to
amend the IUU fishing definition to explicitly include fishing
activities in violation of shark conservation measures that are
required by an RFMO to which the United States is a party.
Third, NMFS proposes to clarify that the IUU fishing definition
applies when a nation fails to report or fails to provide accurate or
complete data and information regarding its vessels' fishing activities
as required by an RFMO to which the United States is a party. By adding
an explicit reference to reporting, NMFS intends to highlight the
importance of compliance with RFMO data collection requirements to
support effective fisheries management.
Fourth, NMFS proposes to amend the IUU fishing definition to
include fishing activities conducted by foreign flagged vessels in
waters under U.S. jurisdiction without authorization of the United
States. Such activities undermine the ability of the United States to
sustainably manage its fisheries.
In determining whether to make an IUU fishing identification, NMFS
will take into account all relevant information, in accordance with
Sec. 300.202(a)(2). In addition, when determining whether to identify
a foreign nation for having vessels engaged in fishing activities
within the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ) without authorization of
the United States, NMFS will consider any actions taken by the United
States, the flag State and, where relevant, the international fishery
management organization, to address those activities, as well as the
effectiveness of such actions.
Application of IUU Fishing Identification Criteria
In addition to the regulatory changes identified above, NMFS is
reconsidering the manner in which it has applied Section 609 of the
Moratorium Protection Act and its implementing regulations. To date,
NMFS has primarily applied this Act and implementing regulations to
identify a nation when the nation's vessels were engaged in illegal,
unregulated, or unreported fishing activity that was directly
attributable to specific vessel conduct. In future identifications,
NMFS intends to identify nations based on fishing activity that was
illegal, unreported, or unregulated because of either the vessels'
conduct or the nation's actions or inactions in managing its fisheries.
After two cycles of identification, NMFS has determined that these
provisions could be applied more broadly. In order to more
comprehensively address IUU fishing, we must consider not only the
prohibited actions of fishing vessels but also non-compliance in the
form of action or inaction at the national level that leads to IUU
fishing. To further this goal, NMFS is proposing to identify a nation
based on the nation's actions or inactions that lead to fishing by
vessels registered under their flag that is not in
[[Page 40557]]
accordance with RFMO conservation and management measures. For example,
under this approach, NMFS could identify a nation when the nation has
failed to implement measures that are required by an RFMO to which the
United States is a party, and as a result the fishing vessels of that
nation operated in a manner inconsistent with the relevant RFMO
conservation and management measures.
This approach is consistent with the plain language of the
statutory guidelines provided in Section 609(e)(3)(A) of the Moratorium
Protection Act for the IUU fishing definition. These statutory
guidelines specifically mention certain RFMO conservation and
management measures, such as catch limits or quotas, that must be
implemented by nations that are parties to the RFMO and cannot
necessarily be attributed to specific fishing vessels. For example,
RFMOs can establish quotas for their member nations. Each nation bears
the responsibility for implementing and adhering to the quota it
received. Individual fishing vessels, therefore, cannot be found in
violation of the RFMO's quota, but action or inaction by the flag
nation could result in fishing activity in violation of the quota. In
addition to specific situations mentioned in the minimum statutory
guidelines for the IUU fishing definition, there are other
circumstances in which fishing activities might violate RFMO measures
because of a nation's failure to govern its own fishing vessels or
carry out its own responsibilities. For example, RFMOs require parties
to implement data reporting requirements. In most cases, the nations,
and not individual vessels, compile and report the requisite
information to comply with RFMO conservation and management measures.
Because many measures are inherently a nation's responsibility,
Congress evidently intended NMFS to be able to identify a nation based
on its failure to fulfill the requirements of the relevant RFMO and the
operations of the nation's fisheries in light of this failure.
Under the proposed approach, a nation could be identified for
fishing activities that were illegal, unregulated, or unreported
because of national action or inaction, including, consistent with the
examples discussed above, fishing activities that resulted in the
nation exceeding a harvest quota granted by the relevant RFMO because
the nation failed to implement measures to prevent such overharvest,
and fishing activities that were not reported because the nation failed
to carry out its responsibilities for reporting to ensure collection of
such information.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under the authority of the
Moratorium Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 1826d-1826k, as amended by the
Shark Conservation Act (Pub. L. 111-348).
This proposed rulemaking has been determined to be significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Pursuant to section 605 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the
Chief Council for Regulation of the Department of Commerce certified to
the Chief Council for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration
that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In this
rulemaking, NMFS proposes to amend the identification and certification
procedures under the Moratorium Protection Act to prevent shark finning
and to promote the conservation and sustainable harvest of sharks by
fishing vessels of foreign nations, as required under the Shark
Conservation Act (Pub. L. 111-348).
A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the
legal basis for this action are contained at the beginning of this
section in the preamble and in the SUMMARY section of the preamble.
Briefly, under the proposed regulations, NMFS would identify a foreign
nation in a biennial report to Congress if fishing vessels of that
nation have been engaged during the preceding calendar year in fishing
activities or practices in waters beyond any national jurisdiction that
target or incidentally catch sharks and the nation has not adopted a
regulatory program for the conservation of sharks, including measures
to prohibit removal of any of the fins of a shark (including the tail)
and discarding of the carcass of the shark at sea, that is comparable
to that of the United States, taking into account different conditions.
The Secretary of Commerce will issue either a positive or negative
certification to each nation that is identified in the biennial report
to Congress. A positive certification would demonstrate that the nation
has taken the necessary corrective action to address the fishing
activities of concern described in the biennial report to Congress.
Nations identified for having vessels engaged in shark catch on the
high seas that do not receive a positive certification from the
Secretary of Commerce may be subject to measures imposed by the
Secretary of the Treasury under the High Seas Driftnet Fisheries
Enforcement Act (16 U.S.C. 1826a). Such measures include the denial of
port privileges of fishing vessels of those nations, and, as directed
by the President, prohibition on the importation into the United States
of certain fish and fish products caught by the vessels engaged in the
relevant activity for which the nations were identified, or other
measures.
To receive a positive certification, any nation that is identified
as having fishing vessels engaged in fishing activities or practices on
the high seas that target or incidentally catch sharks will need to
provide documentary evidence of the adoption of a regulatory program
for the conservation of sharks that is comparable in effectiveness to
that of the United States, taking into account different conditions,
including conditions that could bear on the feasibility and
effectiveness of measures. Prior to being issued a positive
certification, such nation will also need to establish a management
plan that assists in the collection of species-specific data in order
to receive a positive certification.
Because the proposed regulations are purely procedural in nature,
and only set out how NMFS is to make decisions regarding certifications
for nations that have been identified in the biennial report to
Congress, there are no direct economic impacts on small or large
entities. Therefore, the proposed regulations will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
and do not need to be analyzed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. As
a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required
and none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
for Sec. Sec. 300.206(b)(2), 300.207(c), and 300.208(c) subject to
review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
collection-of-information requirements have been provided to OMB.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and procedure, Antarctica, Canada, Exports,
Fish, Fisheries, Fishing, Imports, Indians, Labeling, Marine resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Russian Federation,
Transportation, Treaties, Wildlife.
[[Page 40558]]
Dated: July 5, 2012.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 300 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Moratorium Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 1826d-1826k
2. Section 300.200 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 300.200 Purpose and scope.
The purpose of this subpart is to implement the requirements in the
High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act (``Moratorium
Protection Act'') to identify and certify nations whose vessels engaged
in illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing; whose fishing
activities result in bycatch of protected living marine resources; or
whose vessels engaged in fishing activities or practices on the high
seas that target or incidentally catch sharks where the nation has not
adopted a regulatory program for the conservation of sharks, comparable
in effectiveness to that of the United States, taking into account
different conditions. This language applies to vessels entitled to fly
the flag of the nation in question. Where the Secretary of Commerce
determines that an identified nation has not taken the necessary
actions to warrant receipt of a positive certification, the Secretary
of Commerce may recommend to the President that the United States
prohibit the importation of certain fish and fish products from the
identified nation or other measures. The Secretary of Commerce will
recommend to the President appropriate measures, including trade
restrictive measures, to be taken against identified nations that have
not received a positive certification, to address the fishing
activities or practices for which such nations were identified in the
biennial report. The Secretary of Commerce will make such a
recommendation on a case-by-case basis in accordance with international
obligations, including the WTO Agreement. The Moratorium Protection Act
also authorizes cooperation and assistance to nations to take action to
combat illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing, reduce bycatch of
protected living marine resources, and achieve shark conservation.
3. In Sec. 300.201, the definition of ``Illegal, unreported, or
unregulated (IUU) fishing'' is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 300.201 Definitions.
* * * * *
Illegal, unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing means:
(1) In the case of parties to an international fishery management
agreement to which the United States is a party, fishing activities
that violate conservation and management measures required under an
international fishery management agreement to which the United States
is a party, including but not limited to catch limits or quotas,
capacity restrictions, bycatch reduction requirements, shark
conservation measures, and data reporting;
(2) In the case of non-parties to an international fishery
management agreement to which the United States is a party, fishing
activities that would undermine the conservation of the resources
managed under that agreement;
(3) Overfishing of fish stocks shared by the United States, for
which there are no applicable international conservation or management
measures, or in areas with no applicable international fishery
management organization or agreement, that has adverse impacts on such
stocks; or,
(4) Fishing activity that has a significant adverse impact on
seamounts, hydrothermal vents, cold water corals and other vulnerable
marine ecosystems located beyond any national jurisdiction, for which
there are no applicable conservation or management measures or in areas
with no applicable international fishery management organization or
agreement.
(5) Fishing activities by foreign flagged vessels in U.S. waters
without authorization of the United States.
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 300.202, paragraphs (a)(2) and (d)(1) are revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 300.202 Identification and certification of nations engaged in
illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing activities.
(a) * * *
(2) When determining whether to identify a nation as having fishing
vessels engaged in IUU fishing, NMFS will take into account all
relevant matters, including but not limited to the history, nature,
circumstances, extent, duration, and gravity of the IUU fishing
activity in question, and any measures that the nation has implemented
to address the IUU fishing activity. NMFS will also take into account
whether an international fishery management organization exists with a
mandate to regulate the fishery in which the IUU activity in question
takes place. If such an organization exists, NMFS will consider whether
the relevant international fishery management organization has adopted
measures that are effective at addressing the IUU fishing activity in
question and, if the nation whose fishing vessels are engaged, or have
been engaged, in IUU fishing is a party to, or maintains cooperating
status with, the organization. NMFS will also take into account any
actions taken or on-going proceedings by the United States and/or flag
State to address the IUU fishing activity of concern as well as the
effectiveness of such actions.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) The Secretary of Commerce shall issue a positive certification
to an identified nation upon making a determination that such nation
has taken appropriate corrective action to address the activities for
which such nation has been identified in the biennial report to
Congress. When making such determination, the Secretary shall take into
account the following:
(i) Whether the government of the nation identified pursuant to
paragraph (a) of this section has provided evidence documenting that it
has taken corrective action to address the IUU fishing activity
described in the biennial report;
(ii) Whether the relevant international fishery management
organization has adopted and, if applicable, the identified member
nation has implemented and is enforcing, measures to effectively
address the IUU fishing activity of the identified nation's fishing
vessels described in the biennial report;
(iii) Whether the United States has taken enforcement action to
effectively address the IUU fishing activity of the identified nation
described in the biennial report; and
(iv) Whether the identified nation has cooperated in any action
taken by the United States to address the IUU fishing activity
described in the biennial report.
* * * * *
Sec. 300.203 [Amended]
5. In Section 300.203, paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (c)(1) are
revised; paragraph (c)(2) is redesignated as paragraph (c)(3), and a
new paragraph (c)(2) is added to read as follows:
(a) * * *
(1) NMFS will identify and list, in the biennial report to Congress
nations--
[[Page 40559]]
(i) whose fishing vessels are engaged, or have been engaged during
the preceding calendar year prior to publication of the biennial report
to Congress, in fishing activities or practices either in waters beyond
any national jurisdiction that result in bycatch of a PLMR, or in
waters beyond the U.S. EEZ that result in bycatch of a PLMR that is
shared by the United States;
(ii) if the nation is a party to or maintains cooperating status
with the relevant international organization with jurisdiction over the
conservation and protection of the relevant PLMRs, or a relevant
international or regional fishery organization, and the organization
has not adopted measures to effectively end or reduce bycatch of such
species; and
(iii) the nation has not implemented measures designed to end or
reduce such bycatch that are comparable in effectiveness to U.S.
regulatory requirements, taking into account different conditions that
could bear on the feasibility and efficacy of comparable measures.
(2) When determining whether to identify nations as having fishing
vessels engaged in PLMR bycatch, NMFS will take into account all
relevant matters including, but not limited to, the history, nature,
circumstances, extent, duration, and gravity of the bycatch activity in
question.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Initiate consultations within 60 days after submission of the
biennial report to Congress with the governments of identified nations
for the purposes of encouraging adoption of a regulatory program for
protected living marine resources that is comparable in effectiveness
to that of the United States, taking into account different conditions,
and establishment of a management plan that assists in the collection
of species--specific data;
(2) Seek to enter into bilateral and multilateral treaties with
such nations to protect the PLMRs from bycatch activities described in
the biennial report; and
* * * * *
6. Section 300.204 is redesignated as Sec. 300.205 and a new Sec.
300.204 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 300.204 Identification and certification of nations whose
vessels engaged in shark catch.
(a) Procedures to identify nations if fishing vessels of that
nation are engaged in fishing activities or practices in waters beyond
any national jurisdiction that target or incidentally catch sharks
during the preceding calendar year.--
(1) NMFS will identify and list in the biennial report to Congress
nations--
(i) whose fishing vessels are engaged, or have been engaged during
the calendar year prior to publication of the biennial report to
Congress, in fishing activities or practices in waters beyond any
national jurisdiction that target or incidentally catch sharks; and
(ii) where that nation has not adopted a regulatory program to
provide for the conservation of sharks, including measures to prohibit
removal of any of the fins of a shark (including the tail) and discard
the carcass of the shark at sea, that is comparable in effectiveness to
that of the United States, taking into account different conditions,
including conditions that could bear on the feasibility and
effectiveness of measures.
(2) When determining whether to identify nations for these
activities, NMFS will take into account all relevant matters including,
but not limited to, the history, nature, circumstances, duration, and
gravity of the fishing activity of concern.
(b) Notification of nations identified as having fishing vessels
engaged in fishing activities or practices that target or incidentally
catch sharks. Upon identifying in the biennial report to Congress a
nation whose vessels engaged in fishing activities or practices in
waters beyond any national jurisdiction that target or incidentally
catch sharks, the Secretary of Commerce will notify the President of
such identification. Within 60 days after submission of the biennial
report to Congress, the Secretary of Commerce, acting through or in
consultation with the Secretary of State, will notify identified
nations about the requirements under the Moratorium Protection Act and
this subpart N.
(c) Consultations and negotiations. Upon submission of the biennial
report to Congress, the Secretary of Commerce, acting through or in
consultation with the Secretary of State, will:
(1) Initiate consultations within 60 days after submission of the
biennial report to Congress with the governments of identified nations
for the purposes of encouraging adoption of a regulatory program for
the conservation of sharks that is comparable in effectiveness to that
of the United States, taking into account different conditions, and
establishment of a management plan that assists in the collection of
species-specific data;
(2) Seek to enter into bilateral and multilateral treaties or other
arrangements with such nations to protect sharks; and
(3) Seek agreements through the appropriate international
organizations calling for international restrictions on the fishing
activities or practices described in the biennial report and, as
necessary, request the Secretary of State to initiate the amendment of
any existing international treaty to which the United States is a party
for the conservation of sharks to make such agreements consistent with
this subpart.
(d) International Cooperation and Assistance. To the greatest
extent possible, consistent with existing authority and the
availability of funds, the Secretary shall:
(1) Provide appropriate assistance to nations identified by the
Secretary under paragraph (a) of this section and international
organizations of which those nations are members to assist those
nations in qualifying for a positive certification under paragraph (e)
of this section;
(2) Undertake, where appropriate, cooperative research activities
on species assessments and harvesting techniques aimed at mitigating or
eliminating the non-target catch of sharks, with those nations or
organizations;
(3) Encourage and facilitate the transfer of appropriate technology
to those nations or organizations to assist those nations in qualifying
for positive certification under paragraph (e) of this section; and
(4) Provide assistance to those nations or organizations in
designing, implementing, and enforcing appropriate fish harvesting
plans for the conservation and sustainable management of sharks.
(e) Procedures to certify nations identified as having fishing
vessels engaged in fishing activities or practices that target or
incidentally catch sharks.--Each nation that is identified as having
fishing vessels engaged in fishing activities or practices in waters
beyond any national jurisdiction that target or incidentally catch
sharks and has not adopted a regulatory program for the conservation of
sharks, including measures to prohibit removal of any of the fins of a
shark (including the tail) and discard the carcass of the shark at sea,
that is comparable to that of the United States, taking into account
different conditions, shall receive either a positive or a negative
certification from the Secretary of Commerce. This certification will
be published in the biennial report to Congress. The Secretary of
Commerce shall issue a positive certification to an identified
[[Page 40560]]
nation upon making a determination that:
(1) Such nation has provided evidence documenting its adoption of a
regulatory program for the conservation of sharks that is comparable in
effectiveness to regulatory measures required under U.S. law in the
relevant fisheries, taking into account different conditions, including
conditions that could bear on the feasibility and effectiveness of
measures; and (ii) Such nation has established a management plan that
will assist in the collection of species-specific data on sharks to
support international stock assessments and conservation efforts for
sharks.
(2) Prior to a formal certification determination, nations will be
provided with preliminary certification determinations, and an
opportunity to support and/or refute the preliminary determinations,
and communicate actions taken to adopt a regulatory program that is
comparable in effectiveness to that of the United States, taking into
account different conditions. The Secretary of Commerce shall consider
any relevant information received during consultations when making its
formal certification determination.
* * * * *
7. Newly redesignated Sec. 300.205 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 300.205 Effect of certification.
(a) If a nation identified under Sec. 300.202(a), Sec.
300.203(a), or Sec. 300.204(a) does not receive a positive
certification under this subpart (i.e., the nation receives a negative
certification or no certification is made), the fishing vessels of such
nation are, to the extent consistent with international law, subject to
the denial of entry by the Secretary of the Treasury into any place in
the United States and to the navigable waters of the United States.
(b) Upon notification and any recommendations by the Secretary of
Commerce to the President that an identified nation has failed to
receive a positive certification, the President is authorized to direct
the Secretary of the Treasury to prohibit the importation of certain
fish and fish products from such nation (see Sec. 300.206).
(c) Any action recommended under paragraph (b) shall be consistent
with international obligations, including the WTO Agreement.
(d) If certain fish and fish products are prohibited from entering
the United States, within six months after the imposition of the
prohibition, the Secretary of Commerce shall determine whether the
prohibition is insufficient to cause that nation to effectively address
the IUU fishing, bycatch, or shark catch described in the biennial
report, or that nation has retaliated against the United States as a
result of that prohibition. The Secretary of Commerce shall certify to
the President each affirmative determination that an import prohibition
is insufficient to cause a nation to effectively address such IUU
fishing activity, bycatch, or shark catch or that a nation has taken
retaliatory action against the United States. This certification is
deemed to be a certification under section 1978(a) of Title 22, which
provides that the President may direct the Secretary of the Treasury to
prohibit the bringing or the importation into the United States of any
products from the offending country for any duration as the President
determines appropriate and to the extent that such prohibition is
sanctioned by the World Trade Organization.
(e) Duration of certification. Any nation identified in the
biennial report to Congress for having vessels engaged in IUU fishing
that is negatively certified will remain negatively certified until the
Secretary of Commerce determines that the nation has taken appropriate
corrective action to address the IUU fishing activities for which it
was identified in the biennial report. Any nation identified in the
biennial report to Congress for having vessels engaged in PLMR bycatch
or catch of sharks that is negatively certified will remain negatively
certified until the Secretary of Commerce determines that the nation
has taken the necessary actions pursuant to the Moratorium Protection
Act to receive a positive certification.
(f) Consultations. NMFS will, working through or in consultation
with the Department of State, continue consultations with nations that
do not receive a positive certification with respect to the fishing
activities described in the biennial report to Congress. The Secretary
of Commerce shall take the results of such consultations into
consideration when making a subsequent certification determination for
each such nation.
8. Redesignate Sec. 300.205 as Sec. 300.206, and in newly
redesignated Sec. 300.206, revise paragraphs (a) and (b)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 300.206 Denial of port privileges and import restrictions on
fish or fish products.
(a) * * *
(1) Vessels from a nation identified in the biennial report under
Sec. 300.202(a), Sec. 300.203(a), or Sec. 300.204(a) and not
positively certified by the Secretary of Commerce that enter any place
in the United States or the navigable waters of the United States
remain subject to inspection and may be prohibited from landing,
processing, or transshipping fish and fish products, under applicable
law. Services, including the refueling and re-supplying of such fishing
vessels, may be prohibited, with the exception of services essential to
the safety, health, and welfare of the crew. Fishing vessels will not
be denied port access or services in cases of force majeure or
distress.
(2) For nations identified in the previous biennial report under
Sec. 300.202(a) that are not positively certified in the current
biennial report, the Secretary of Commerce shall so notify and make
recommendations to the President, who is authorized to direct the
Secretary of the Treasury to impose import prohibitions with respect to
fish and fish products from those nations. Such a recommendation would
address the relevant fishing activities or practices for which such
nations were identified in the biennial report. Such import
prohibitions, if implemented, would apply to fish and fish products
managed under an applicable international fishery agreement. If there
is no applicable international fishery agreement, such prohibitions, if
implemented, would only apply to fish and fish products caught by
vessels engaged in illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing. For
nations identified under Sec. 300.203(a) or Sec. 300.204(a) that are
not positively certified, the Secretary of Commerce shall so notify and
make recommendations to the President, who is authorized to direct the
Secretary of the Treasury to impose import prohibitions with respect to
fish and fish products from those nations; such prohibitions would only
apply to fish and fish products caught by the vessels engaged in the
relevant activity for which the nation was identified.
(3) Any action recommended under paragraph (a)(2) shall be
consistent with international obligations, including the WTO Agreement.
(b) * * *
(4) Removal of negative certifications and import restrictions.
Upon a determination by the Secretary of Commerce that an identified
nation that was not certified positively has satisfactorily met the
conditions in this subpart and that nation has been positively
certified, the provisions of Sec. 300.206 shall no longer apply. The
Secretary of Commerce, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State
and in cooperation with the Secretary of the Treasury, will notify such
nations and will file with the Office of the
[[Page 40561]]
Federal Register for publication notification of the removal of the
import restrictions effective on the date of publication.
9. Redesignate Sec. 300.206 as Sec. 300.207, and in newly
redesignated Sec. 300.207, revise the section heading, and paragraph
(c), and add paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 300.207 Alternative procedures for nations identified as having
vessels engaged in IUU fishing activities that are not certified under
Sec. 300.202
* * * * *
(c) Fish and fish products offered for entry under this section
must be accompanied by a completed documentation of admissibility
available from NMFS. The documentation of admissibility must be
executed by a duly authorized official of the identified nation and
must be validated by a responsible official(s) designated by NMFS. The
documentation must be executed and submitted in a format (electronic
facsimile (fax), the Internet, etc.) specified by NMFS.
(d) Any action recommended under this section shall be consistent
with international obligations, including the WTO Agreement.
10. Redesignate Sec. 300.207 as Sec. 300.208, and in newly
redesignated Sec. 300.208, revise the section heading and add
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 300.208 Alternative procedures for nations identified as having
vessels engaged in bycatch of PLMRs that are not certified under Sec.
300.203.
(d) Any action recommended under this section shall be consistent
with international obligations, including the WTO Agreement.
11. Add new Sec. 300.209 to read as follows:
Sec. 300.209 Alternative procedures for nations identified as having
vessels engaged in shark catch that are not certified under Sec.
300.204.
(a) These certification procedures may be applied to fish and fish
products from a vessel of a harvesting nation that has been identified
under Sec. 300.204 in the event that the Secretary cannot reach a
certification determination for that nation by the time of the next
biennial report. These procedures shall not apply to fish and fish
products from identified nations that have received either a negative
or a positive certification under this subpart.
(b) Consistent with paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary of
Commerce may allow entry of fish and fish products on a shipment-by-
shipment, shipper-by-shipper, or other basis if the Secretary
determines that imports were harvested by fishing activities or
practices that do not target or incidentally catch sharks, or were
harvested by practices that--
(1) Are comparable to those of the United States, taking into
account different conditions; and
(2) Include the gathering of species specific shark data that can
be used to support international and regional assessments and
conservation efforts for sharks.
(c) Fish and fish products offered for entry under this section
must be accompanied by a completed documentation of admissibility
available from NMFS. The documentation of admissibility must be
executed by a duly authorized official of the identified nation and
validated by a responsible official(s) designated by NMFS. The
documentation must be executed and submitted in a format (electronic
facsimile (fax), the Internet, etc.) specified by NMFS.
(d) Any action recommended under this section shall be consistent
with international obligations, including the WTO Agreement.
[FR Doc. 2012-16838 Filed 7-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P