AHRQ Workgroups on ICD-10-CM/PCS Conversion of Quality Indicators (QIs) - Extension Date for Nominations, 40620-40622 [2012-16734]
Download as PDF
40620
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Notices
(5) Shall not be an HHS employee
working on their applications or
submissions during assigned duty
hours.
(6) Shall not be an employee of the
Office of the National Coordinator
(7) Federal grantees may not use
Federal funds to develop COMPETES
Act challenge applications unless
consistent with the purpose of their
grant award.
(8) Federal contractors may not use
Federal funds from a contract to develop
COMPETES Act challenge applications
or to fund efforts in support of a
COMPETES Act challenge submission.
All individual members of a team
must meet the eligibility requirements.
An individual or entity shall not be
deemed ineligible because the
individual or entity used Federal
facilities or consulted with Federal
employees during a competition if the
facilities and employees are made
available to all individuals and entities
participating in the competition on an
equitable basis.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Registration Process for Participants
1. During the Challenge Submission
Period, visit https://YourRecord.
Challenge.gov and register (Registration
is free) or log in with an existing
ChallengePost account. After a
Contestant signs up, a confirmation
email will be sent to the email address
provided. The Contestant must use the
confirmation email to verify his or her
email address. The registered Contestant
will then be able to enter a Submission.
2. On YourRecord.Challenge.gov,
click ‘‘Accept this challenge’’ to register
your interest in participating. This step
ensures that you will receive important
challenge updates.
3. Create a video and ensure the
following (please read the Official Rules
on https://YourRecord.challenge.gov for
complete requirements):
a. Your video addresses questions
such as:
i. What prompted you to ask for
access to your health record?
ii. What did you find when you
reviewed your health record?
iii. How did you, or your health care
provider, improve your quality of care
or that of a loved one after gaining
access to your health record? In other
words, what was the benefit of being
able to view what was in your record?
iv. What did you, or your provider
learn from accessing your health record?
Was any information missing or
incorrect?
v. What kinds of things were you able
to do with your record once you had
access to it? Share it with other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
providers? Check to make sure the
information was correct? What else?
b. Your video gives a specific example
(personal story, experience, testimonial,
or thoughtful idea) of the benefits of
having access to view your health
record and the ability to review what is
in your health record.
c. Your video encourages viewers to
visit www.HealthIT.gov and to ask their
health care provider to see and get a
copy of their medical record.
d. Your video is no longer than 2
minutes.
4. Confirm that you have read and
agreed to the Official Rules. A
Contestant will be required to fill out
the submission form on
YourRecord.Challenge.gov and must
provide:
• The title of the Video;
• A link to the Video on
YouTube.com or Vimeo.com (the Video
should be no longer than 2 minutes);
• A text description of how you or a
loved one benefitted from having access
to your health record
• A transcript of the words spoken or
sung in the video; and
• Uploaded consent forms for
everyone who appears in the video
regardless of age.
All individuals that appear in a Video
must complete and sign the Video
Consent Form. If a minor appears in the
Video, the minor’s parent/legal guardian
must also sign the Video Consent Form.
A Submission will not be considered
complete and eligible to win prizes
without a completed Video Consent
Form being uploaded from all
individuals that appear in the Video. All
completed Video Consent Forms must
include a handwritten signature, and be
scanned, combined in to a single file
(ZIP, PDF, or doc), and uploaded on the
submission form on
BloodPressure.Challenge.gov.
Amount of the Prize
Winner
First Prize .................
Second Prize ............
Third Prize ................
Honorable Mention ...
Popular Choice
Award ....................
Prize
Quantity
$3,000
2,000
1,000
500
1
1
1
2
700
1
Basis Upon Which Winner Will Be
Selected
Submissions that meet category
requirements will be evaluated by an
internal panel of judges for Category
Prizes based on the following criteria (to
be equally weighted):
1. Quality of the Story (Includes
elements such as the authenticity and
originality of your story and how you
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
described getting a copy of your
information and using it to improve
your quality of care or the care of a
loved one.)
2. Potential Impact for motivating and
inspiring others to access their health
record (Includes whether the video is
compelling, instructive, and easy to
follow so that others can achieve similar
benefits after gaining access to their
health record.)
The five (5) Contestants whose
Submissions earn the highest overall score
will win, the prize money as outlined in the
chart. In the event of a tie, winners will be
selected based on their score on the criteria
described in (1) and then (2). If there is still
a tie then the winner will be selected based
on a vote by the judging panel.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 3719.
Dated: June 28, 2012.
Erin Poetter,
Consumer e-Health Policy Analyst, Office of
the National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology (ONC), Office of the
Secretary (OS).
[FR Doc. 2012–16821 Filed 7–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–45–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
AHRQ Workgroups on ICD–10–CM/
PCS Conversion of Quality Indicators
(QIs) — Extension Date for
Nominations
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of date extension.
AGENCY:
The Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) is seeking
nominations for members of
approximately 10 multidisciplinary
workgroups, to be convened by AHRQ’s
contractor, on ICD–10–CM/PCS
conversion of the AHRQ Quality
Indicators (QIs). This notice was
previously published on June 4, 2012
(https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR–
2012–06–04/pdf/2012–13306.pdf).
DATES: Please submit nominations on or
before July 22, 2012. Self-nominations
are welcome. Third-party nominations
must indicate that the individual has
been contacted and is willing to serve
on the workgroup. Selected candidates
will be notified no later than July 31,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Nominations can be sent in
the form of a letter or email, preferably
as an electronic file with an email
attachment and should specifically
address the submission criteria as noted
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Notices
below. Electronic submissions are
strongly encouraged. Responses should
be submitted to: Attn: John Bat, Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality,
Center for Delivery, Organization and
Markets, 540 Gaither Road, Room 5119,
Rockville, MD 20850, Email: john.bott@
AHRQ.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Bott, Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, Center for Delivery,
Organization and Markets, 540 Gaither
Road, Room 5119, Rockville, MD 20850,
Email: john.bott@AHRQ.hhs.gov; Phone:
(301) 427–1317; Fax: (301) 427–1430.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These
workgroups are being formed as part of
a structured approach for converting the
existing QI specifications from ICD–9–
CM to ICD–10–CM/PCS, incorporating
coding expertise, clinical expertise, and
health services research/quality
measurement expertise. The workgroups
will evaluate the results of automated
’code mapping’’ from ICD–9–CM to
ICD–10–CM/PCS, providing input and
advice regarding similarities and
differences between ICD–9–CM and
ICD–10–CM/PCS codes that are mapped
to each other. This workgroup process
will lead to recommendations regarding
how the existing AHRQ QIs should be
re-specified using ICD–10–CM/PCS
codes, retaining the original clinical
intent of each indicator while taking
advantage of the greater specificity of
ICD–10–CM/PCS to improve the
indicator’s validity. Workgroup
participation will be uncompensated.
For additional information about the
AHRQ QIs, please visit the AHRQ Web
site at https://www.QUALITYindicators.
AHRQ.gov.
Specifically, each Workgroup on ICD–
10–CM/PCS Conversion of Quality
Indicators will consist of:
—At least three individuals with
relevant clinical expertise (e.g.,
cardiovascular disease, neurologic
disease, orthopedic and
musculoskeletal disease, obstetrics
and gynecologic disease, surgery,
critical care and pulmonary disease,
diabetes and endocrine disease,
infectious disease, neonatology and
pediatric disease, miscellaneous) and
at least two individuals with relevant
coding expertise.
—One or more individuals with field
experience using AHRQ QI measures
for assessing hospital performance.
—One or more individuals with
expertise in validating ICD–9–CM or
ICD–10–CM/PCS codes using chart
abstraction (to assess criterion
validity), or otherwise assessing their
accuracy and usefulness in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
identifying individuals with specific
adverse outcomes.
—One or more individuals with
experience using data from the AHRQ
Healthcare Cost and Utilization
Project or similar data for the purpose
of calculating AHRQ QIs.
Submission Criteria
To be considered for membership on
a QI ICD–10–CM/PCS Conversion
Workgroup, please send the following
information for each nominee:
1. A brief nomination letter
highlighting experience and knowledge
relevant to the development,
refinement, or testing of quality
measures based on ICD9–CM and/or
ICD–10–CM/PCS coded data, and
demonstrating familiarity with the
AHRQ QIs and health care
administrative data. (See selection
criteria below.) The nominee’s clinical
or coding profession and specialty, and
the spectrum of his or her clinical or
coding expertise, should be described.
Please include full contact information
of nominee: name, title, organization,
mailing address, telephone and fax
numbers, and email address.
2. Curriculum vita (with citations to
any pertinent publications related to
quality measure specification, ICD–9–
CM, or ICD–10–CM/PCS).
3. Description of any financial
interest, recent conduct, or current or
planned commercial, non-commercial,
institutional, intellectual, public
service, or other activities pertinent to
the potential scope of the workgroups,
which could be perceived as influencing
the workgroup’s process or
recommendations. The objective is not
to prevent nominees with potential
conflicts of interest from serving on the
panels, but to obtain such information
so as to best inform the selection of
workgroup members, and to help
minimize such conflicts.
Nominee Selection Criteria
Nominees should have technical
expertise in health care quality measure
development, refinement, or
application, and familiarity with the
ICD–9–CM and ICD–10–CM/PCS code
sets (especially insofar as they are used
to specify quality measures).
More specifically, each candidate will
be evaluated using the following
criteria:
—Knowledge of health care quality
measurement using administrative
data in specific, relevant clinical
domains (e.g., cardiovascular disease,
neurologic disease, orthopedic and
musculoskeletal disease, obstetrics
and gynecologic disease, surgery,
critical care and pulmonary disease,
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40621
diabetes and endocrine disease,
infectious disease, neonatology and
pediatric disease, miscellaneous);
—Peer-reviewed publications relevant
to developing, refining, testing, or
applying health care quality measures
based on ICD-coded administrative
data;
—Other experience developing,
refining, testing, or applying health
care quality measures based on ICDcoded administrative data;
—Expertise in ICD–9–CM and/or ICD–
10–CM/PCS coding;
—Expertise in hospital quality
improvement, patient safety, and/or
clinical documentation improvement;
—Familiarity with the AHRQ Quality
Indicators and their application; and,
—Availability to participate in
conference calls and provide written
comments starting from late August
through October 2012.
Time Commitment
In an effort to solicit expert input and
recommendations on conversion of the
AHRQ QIs from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–
CM/PCS, we are initiating a technical
review process that will require
participation in approximately three to
five conference calls with some pre and
post evaluation time (estimated at 13
hours). Results from this process will
influence the conversion of the AHRQ
QI from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM/PCS.
Beginning in late August through
October, selected nominees will be
asked to participate in the following
activities:
Workgroup Activities
1. Review the current ICD–9–CM
specifications of AHRQ QIs within the
workgroup’s clinical domain (e.g.,
cardiovascular disease, neurologic
disease, orthopedic and musculoskeletal
disease, obstetrics and gynecologic
disease, surgery, critical care and
pulmonary disease, diabetes and
endocrine disease, infectious disease,
neonatology and pediatric disease,
miscellaneous), along with background
documents justifying or explaining
those specifications (about 1.5 hours).
2. Participate in teleconference to
explain the workgroup activities and
processes, and to discuss current QI
specifications and their justification (1.0
hours).
3. Review proposed mapping of ICD–
9–CM to ICD–10–CM/PCS codes and
identify relevant questions and concerns
(about 3 hours).
4. Participate in teleconference to
discuss the proposed mappings,
including relevant questions and
concerns (1.5 hours).
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
40622
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2012 / Notices
5. Following a structured process
(e.g., modified Delphi), provide specific
input to support or modify the proposed
mappings (about 2.5 hours).
6. Participate in teleconference to
discuss areas of disagreement among
workgroup members, and to achieve
consensus when possible (1.5 hours).
7. Following a structured process
(e.g., modified Delphi), provide specific
input to support or modify the proposed
mappings, incorporating changes
accepted in previous steps (about 1.0
hour).
8. Participate in final (optional)
teleconference to review final
recommendations and discuss
contextual issues (1.0 hour).
Please note that should additional
conference calls be necessary,
workgroup members are expected to
make every effort to participate. The
workgroups will conduct business by
telephone, email, or other electronic
means as needed.
Background
The AHRQ Quality Indicators (AHRQ
QIs) are a unique set of measures of
health care quality that make use of
readily available hospital inpatient
administrative data. The QIs have been
used for various purposes. Some of
these include tracking, hospital selfassessment, reporting of hospitalspecific quality or pay for performance.
The AHRQ QIs are provider- and arealevel quality indicators and currently
consist of four modules: the Prevention
Quality Indicators (PQI), the Inpatient
Quality Indicators, the Patient Safety
Indicators (PSI), and the Pediatric
Quality Indicators (PedQIs). AHRQ is
committed to converting the QIs from
ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM/PCS in an
accurate and transparent manner, taking
advantage of the additional specificity
of ICD–10–CM/PCS to improve the
validity and usefulness of the QIs, from
October 2014 onward.
Dated: July, 2, 2012.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2012–16734 Filed 7–9–12; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4160–90–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Food and Drug Administration
Mine Safety and Health Research
Advisory Committee, National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health
(MSHRAC, NIOSH)
Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory
Committee; Notice of Meeting
In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC)
announces the following meeting for the
aforementioned committee:
Times and Dates:
8:30 a.m.–5:15 p.m., August 20, 2012
8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m., August 21, 2012
Place: Hilton Garden Inn Pittsburgh/
Southpointe, 1000 Corporate Drive,
Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317. Telephone:
(724) 743–5000, Fax: (724) 743–5010.
Status: Open to the public, limited only by
the space available. The meeting room
accommodates approximately 50 people.
Purpose: This committee is charged with
providing advice to the Secretary,
Department of Health and Human Services;
the Director, CDC; and the Director, NIOSH,
on priorities in mine safety and health
research, including grants and contracts for
such research, 30 U.S.C. 812(b)(2), Section
102(b)(2).
Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will
focus on engineering noise controls, reducing
coal dust exposures, reducing injuries
through improved illumination,
demographics survey of the mining industry,
implementation of the National Academy of
Science’s recommendations, oxygen supply
partnership, safety culture, occupational
health and safety management systems,
preventing coal dust explosions, and
reducing silica exposures.
Agenda items are subject to change as
priorities dictate.
Contact Person for More Information:
Jeffery L. Kohler, Ph.D., Designated Federal
Officer, MSHRAC, NIOSH, CDC, 626
Cochrans Mill Road, Mailstop P05,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236, telephone
(412) 386–5301, fax (412) 386–5300.
The Director, Management Analysis and
Services Office, has been delegated the
authority to sign Federal Register Notices
pertaining to announcements of meetings and
other committee management activities, for
both the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
[FR Doc. 2012–16776 Filed 7–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
16:28 Jul 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Dated: July 2, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0001]
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces a forthcoming
meeting of a public advisory committee
of the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). The meeting will be open to the
public.
Name of Committee: Anti-Infective
Drugs Advisory Committee.
General Function of the Committee:
To provide advice and
recommendations to the Agency on
FDA’s regulatory issues.
Date and Time: The meeting will be
held on September 5, 2012, from 8 a.m.
to 5 p.m.
Location: FDA White Oak Campus,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building
31 Conference Center, the Great Room
(rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002. Information regarding special
accommodations due to a disability,
visitor parking, and transportation may
be accessed at: https://www.fda.gov/
AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm; under
the heading ‘‘Resources for You,’’ click
on ‘‘Public Meetings at the FDA White
Oak Campus.’’ Please note that visitors
to the White Oak Campus must enter
through Building 1.
Contact Person: Diane Goyette, Center
for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 2417,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–9001, FAX: 301–847–8533, email:
AIDAC@fda.hhs.gov, or FDA Advisory
Committee Information Line, 1–800–
741–8138 (301–443–0572 in the
Washington, DC area) to find out further
information regarding FDA advisory
committee information. A notice in the
Federal Register about last minute
modifications that impact a previously
announced advisory committee meeting
cannot always be published quickly
enough to provide timely notice.
Therefore, you should always check the
Agency’s Web site at https://www.fda.
gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm
and scroll down to the appropriate
advisory committee meeting link, or call
the appropriate advisory committee
information line to learn about possible
modifications before coming to the
meeting.
Agenda: The committee will discuss
new drug application (NDA) 201688,
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40620-40622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16734]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
AHRQ Workgroups on ICD-10-CM/PCS Conversion of Quality Indicators
(QIs) -- Extension Date for Nominations
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of date extension.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is
seeking nominations for members of approximately 10 multidisciplinary
workgroups, to be convened by AHRQ's contractor, on ICD-10-CM/PCS
conversion of the AHRQ Quality Indicators (QIs). This notice was
previously published on June 4, 2012 (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-06-04/pdf/2012-13306.pdf).
DATES: Please submit nominations on or before July 22, 2012. Self-
nominations are welcome. Third-party nominations must indicate that the
individual has been contacted and is willing to serve on the workgroup.
Selected candidates will be notified no later than July 31, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Nominations can be sent in the form of a letter or email,
preferably as an electronic file with an email attachment and should
specifically address the submission criteria as noted
[[Page 40621]]
below. Electronic submissions are strongly encouraged. Responses should
be submitted to: Attn: John Bat, Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality, Center for Delivery, Organization and Markets, 540 Gaither
Road, Room 5119, Rockville, MD 20850, Email: john.bott@AHRQ.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Bott, Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality, Center for Delivery, Organization and Markets,
540 Gaither Road, Room 5119, Rockville, MD 20850, Email:
john.bott@AHRQ.hhs.gov; Phone: (301) 427-1317; Fax: (301) 427-1430.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These workgroups are being formed as part of
a structured approach for converting the existing QI specifications
from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM/PCS, incorporating coding expertise,
clinical expertise, and health services research/quality measurement
expertise. The workgroups will evaluate the results of automated 'code
mapping'' from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM/PCS, providing input and advice
regarding similarities and differences between ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM/
PCS codes that are mapped to each other. This workgroup process will
lead to recommendations regarding how the existing AHRQ QIs should be
re-specified using ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, retaining the original clinical
intent of each indicator while taking advantage of the greater
specificity of ICD-10-CM/PCS to improve the indicator's validity.
Workgroup participation will be uncompensated.
For additional information about the AHRQ QIs, please visit the
AHRQ Web site at https://www.QUALITYindicators.AHRQ.gov.
Specifically, each Workgroup on ICD-10-CM/PCS Conversion of Quality
Indicators will consist of:
--At least three individuals with relevant clinical expertise (e.g.,
cardiovascular disease, neurologic disease, orthopedic and
musculoskeletal disease, obstetrics and gynecologic disease, surgery,
critical care and pulmonary disease, diabetes and endocrine disease,
infectious disease, neonatology and pediatric disease, miscellaneous)
and at least two individuals with relevant coding expertise.
--One or more individuals with field experience using AHRQ QI measures
for assessing hospital performance.
--One or more individuals with expertise in validating ICD-9-CM or ICD-
10-CM/PCS codes using chart abstraction (to assess criterion validity),
or otherwise assessing their accuracy and usefulness in identifying
individuals with specific adverse outcomes.
--One or more individuals with experience using data from the AHRQ
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project or similar data for the purpose
of calculating AHRQ QIs.
Submission Criteria
To be considered for membership on a QI ICD-10-CM/PCS Conversion
Workgroup, please send the following information for each nominee:
1. A brief nomination letter highlighting experience and knowledge
relevant to the development, refinement, or testing of quality measures
based on ICD9-CM and/or ICD-10-CM/PCS coded data, and demonstrating
familiarity with the AHRQ QIs and health care administrative data. (See
selection criteria below.) The nominee's clinical or coding profession
and specialty, and the spectrum of his or her clinical or coding
expertise, should be described. Please include full contact information
of nominee: name, title, organization, mailing address, telephone and
fax numbers, and email address.
2. Curriculum vita (with citations to any pertinent publications
related to quality measure specification, ICD-9-CM, or ICD-10-CM/PCS).
3. Description of any financial interest, recent conduct, or
current or planned commercial, non-commercial, institutional,
intellectual, public service, or other activities pertinent to the
potential scope of the workgroups, which could be perceived as
influencing the workgroup's process or recommendations. The objective
is not to prevent nominees with potential conflicts of interest from
serving on the panels, but to obtain such information so as to best
inform the selection of workgroup members, and to help minimize such
conflicts.
Nominee Selection Criteria
Nominees should have technical expertise in health care quality
measure development, refinement, or application, and familiarity with
the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM/PCS code sets (especially insofar as they
are used to specify quality measures).
More specifically, each candidate will be evaluated using the
following criteria:
--Knowledge of health care quality measurement using administrative
data in specific, relevant clinical domains (e.g., cardiovascular
disease, neurologic disease, orthopedic and musculoskeletal disease,
obstetrics and gynecologic disease, surgery, critical care and
pulmonary disease, diabetes and endocrine disease, infectious disease,
neonatology and pediatric disease, miscellaneous);
--Peer-reviewed publications relevant to developing, refining, testing,
or applying health care quality measures based on ICD-coded
administrative data;
--Other experience developing, refining, testing, or applying health
care quality measures based on ICD-coded administrative data;
--Expertise in ICD-9-CM and/or ICD-10-CM/PCS coding;
--Expertise in hospital quality improvement, patient safety, and/or
clinical documentation improvement;
--Familiarity with the AHRQ Quality Indicators and their application;
and,
--Availability to participate in conference calls and provide written
comments starting from late August through October 2012.
Time Commitment
In an effort to solicit expert input and recommendations on
conversion of the AHRQ QIs from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM/PCS, we are
initiating a technical review process that will require participation
in approximately three to five conference calls with some pre and post
evaluation time (estimated at 13 hours). Results from this process will
influence the conversion of the AHRQ QI from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM/PCS.
Beginning in late August through October, selected nominees will be
asked to participate in the following activities:
Workgroup Activities
1. Review the current ICD-9-CM specifications of AHRQ QIs within
the workgroup's clinical domain (e.g., cardiovascular disease,
neurologic disease, orthopedic and musculoskeletal disease, obstetrics
and gynecologic disease, surgery, critical care and pulmonary disease,
diabetes and endocrine disease, infectious disease, neonatology and
pediatric disease, miscellaneous), along with background documents
justifying or explaining those specifications (about 1.5 hours).
2. Participate in teleconference to explain the workgroup
activities and processes, and to discuss current QI specifications and
their justification (1.0 hours).
3. Review proposed mapping of ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM/PCS codes and
identify relevant questions and concerns (about 3 hours).
4. Participate in teleconference to discuss the proposed mappings,
including relevant questions and concerns (1.5 hours).
[[Page 40622]]
5. Following a structured process (e.g., modified Delphi), provide
specific input to support or modify the proposed mappings (about 2.5
hours).
6. Participate in teleconference to discuss areas of disagreement
among workgroup members, and to achieve consensus when possible (1.5
hours).
7. Following a structured process (e.g., modified Delphi), provide
specific input to support or modify the proposed mappings,
incorporating changes accepted in previous steps (about 1.0 hour).
8. Participate in final (optional) teleconference to review final
recommendations and discuss contextual issues (1.0 hour).
Please note that should additional conference calls be necessary,
workgroup members are expected to make every effort to participate. The
workgroups will conduct business by telephone, email, or other
electronic means as needed.
Background
The AHRQ Quality Indicators (AHRQ QIs) are a unique set of measures
of health care quality that make use of readily available hospital
inpatient administrative data. The QIs have been used for various
purposes. Some of these include tracking, hospital self-assessment,
reporting of hospital-specific quality or pay for performance. The AHRQ
QIs are provider- and area-level quality indicators and currently
consist of four modules: the Prevention Quality Indicators (PQI), the
Inpatient Quality Indicators, the Patient Safety Indicators (PSI), and
the Pediatric Quality Indicators (PedQIs). AHRQ is committed to
converting the QIs from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM/PCS in an accurate and
transparent manner, taking advantage of the additional specificity of
ICD-10-CM/PCS to improve the validity and usefulness of the QIs, from
October 2014 onward.
Dated: July, 2, 2012.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-16734 Filed 7-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M