Safety Zone; Barbara Harder Wedding Fireworks, Lake Erie, Lake View, NY, 39638-39640 [2012-16452]
Download as PDF
39638
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 7, 2012.
J.M. Vojvodich,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Long Island Sound.
A. Regulatory History and Information
[FR Doc. 2012–16296 Filed 7–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0568]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Barbara Harder Wedding
Fireworks, Lake Erie, Lake View, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
Lake Erie, Lake View, NY. This safety
zone is intended to restrict vessels from
a portion of Lake Erie during the
Barbara Harder Wedding Fireworks.
This temporary safety zone is necessary
to protect spectators and vessels from
the hazards associated with a fireworks
display.
DATES: This rule will be effective from
9 p.m. until 11 p.m. on July 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2012–0568]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box, and
click ‘‘Search.’’ You may visit the
Docket Management Facility,
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email LT Christopher
Mercurio, Chief of Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Buffalo; telephone 716–843–9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:28 Jul 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest. The final details
for this event were not known to the
Coast Guard until there was insufficient
time remaining before the event to
publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the
effective date of this rule to wait for a
comment period to run would be both
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest because it would inhibit the
Coast Guard’s ability to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with a maritime fireworks
display, which are discussed further
below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
waiting for 30 day notice period run
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest.
B. Basis and Purpose
Between 9:30 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. on
July 7, 2012, a fireworks display will be
held on Lake Erie near Lake View, NY.
The Captain of the Port Buffalo has
determined that fireworks launched
proximate to a gathering of watercraft
pose a significant risk to public safety
and property. Such hazards include
premature and accidental detonations,
dangerous projectiles, and falling or
burning debris.
C. Discussion of Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in
mind, the Captain of the Port Buffalo
has determined that this temporary
safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of spectators and vessels during
the Barbara Harder Wedding Fireworks.
This zone will be effective and enforced
from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. on July 7,
2012. This zone will encompass all
waters of Lake Erie, Lake View, NY
within a 560 foot radius of position
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42°43′17.8″ N and 78°57′54.2″ W (NAD
83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port
or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. Executive
Order 12866 or under section 1 of
Executive Order 13563. The Office of
Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this rule is not
a significant regulatory action because
we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The safety
zone created by this rule will be
relatively small and enforced for
relatively short time. Also, the safety
zone is designed to minimize its impact
on navigable waters. Furthermore, the
safety zone has been designed to allow
vessels to transit around it. Thus,
restrictions on vessel movement within
that particular area are expected to be
minimal. Under certain conditions,
moreover, vessels may still transit
through the safety zone when permitted
by the Captain of the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
E:\FR\FM\05JYR1.SGM
05JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the Lake Erie on the evening
of July 7, 2012.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This safety zone
would be activated, and thus subject to
enforcement, for only two hours late in
the day. Traffic may be allowed to pass
through the zone with the permission of
the Captain of the Port. The Captain of
the Port can be reached via VHF
channel 16. Before the activation of the
zone, we would issue local Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
14:28 Jul 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
9. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
5. Federalism
VerDate Mar<15>2010
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
39639
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–00568 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0568 Safety Zone; Barbara
Harder Wedding Fireworks, Lake Erie, Lake
View, NY.
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all waters of Lake Erie, Lake
View, NY within a 560 foot radius of
position 42°43′17.8″ N and 78°57′54.2″
W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This regulation is effective and will be
enforced on July 7, 2012 from 9 p.m.
until 11 p.m.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
E:\FR\FM\05JYR1.SGM
05JYR1
39640
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 21, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2012–16452 Filed 7–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 171
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0049; FRL–9334–4]
RIN 2070–AJ77
Synchronizing the Expiration Dates of
the Pesticide Applicator Certificate
With the Underlying State or Tribal
Certificate
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule will reduce
burden to restricted use pesticide
applicators and simplify federal
certification expiration dates. Restricted
use pesticides (RUPs) are those which
may generally cause unreasonable
adverse effects on the environment
without additional restrictions. RUPs
may only be applied by or under the
direct supervision of an applicator
certified as competent by a certifying
agency. A State, tribe, or Federal agency
becomes a certifying agency by
receiving approval from EPA on their
certification plan. In areas not covered
by a certifying agency, EPA may
establish a Federal certification plan
and issue Federal certificates directly.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:28 Jul 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
One way EPA may issue a Federal
certificate is based on an existing valid
certificate from a certifying agency, and
this final rule will synchronize the
expiration dates on the Federal
certificate with that of the certifying
agency certificate on which the Federal
certificate is based.
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 4, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0049, is
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the OPP Docket in the
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), located in EPA
West, Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Hogue, Field and External Affairs
Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–9072; fax number:
(703) 308–7070; email address: hogue.
joe@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are or intend to
become a certified applicator under an
EPA Federal certification plan. Certified
applicators are included in three major
industries in the North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes described as crop
production, animal production or
exterminating, and pest control services.
Potentially affected entities may
include, but are not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111),
e.g., individuals that are private
certified applicators on farms.
• Animal production (NAICS code
112), e.g., individuals that are private
certified applicators on farms.
• Exterminating and pest control
services (NAICS code 561710), e.g.,
individuals that are commercial
certified applicators for hire.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected.
B. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
This final rule is issued pursuant to
the authority in sections 11 and 25 of
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136i
and w). Section 11 of FIFRA (7 U.S.C.
136i), requires EPA to provide
certification plans for applicators of
RUPs. Section 25 of FIFRA (7 U.S.C.
136w), authorizes EPA to issue
regulations to carry out provisions of
FIFRA.
II. Background
Under the provisions of FIFRA
section 3(d)(1)(C), EPA shall classify a
pesticide for restricted use, if, absent
additional regulatory restrictions, the
Agency determines that it may generally
cause unreasonable adverse effects on
the environment. RUPs may be applied
only by a certified applicator or under
the direct supervision of a certified
applicator.
Pesticide applicators can be certified
either by a certifying agency (a State,
tribe, or non-EPA Federal agency that
has an EPA-approved certification plan),
or directly by EPA through a Federal
certification plan for an area or situation
not covered by a certifying agency’s
plan. Applicators must demonstrate
competency to the certifying agency
granting the certificate, according to the
requirements of that agency’s plan.
Currently, all 50 States, some federal
agencies, and 4 tribes are certifying
agencies (i.e., they implement their
EPA-approved certification plans).
Applicators certified by a State may
apply RUPs in that State, and
applicators certified by a tribe may
apply RUPs in that tribe’s Indian
country, without a Federal certificate.
However, under 40 CFR 171.11, in areas
where there is no EPA-approved
certification plan in effect (currently,
most of Indian country), EPA may
implement a Federal plan, thereby
allowing applicators to use RUPs in the
area covered by the plan after receiving
Federal certification. Under 40 CFR
171.11(e), a Federal plan may include
an option that allows applicators to be
issued an EPA Federal certificate after
submitting to EPA a certification form
along with documentation of a valid
certificate from a certifying agency,
without further demonstration of
competency.
Applicator certificates have expiration
dates to help ensure that certified
applicators maintain their competency.
E:\FR\FM\05JYR1.SGM
05JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 129 (Thursday, July 5, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39638-39640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16452]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0568]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Barbara Harder Wedding Fireworks, Lake Erie, Lake
View, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on
Lake Erie, Lake View, NY. This safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of Lake Erie during the Barbara Harder Wedding
Fireworks. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with a fireworks
display.
DATES: This rule will be effective from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. on July 7,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2012-0568]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box, and click ``Search.'' You may
visit the Docket Management Facility, Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email LT Christopher Mercurio, Chief of
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-
843-9343, email SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The final details for this event were
not known to the Coast Guard until there was insufficient time
remaining before the event to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the
effective date of this rule to wait for a comment period to run would
be both impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it
would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with a maritime fireworks display,
which are discussed further below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for 30 day notice period run would be
impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
B. Basis and Purpose
Between 9:30 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. on July 7, 2012, a fireworks
display will be held on Lake Erie near Lake View, NY. The Captain of
the Port Buffalo has determined that fireworks launched proximate to a
gathering of watercraft pose a significant risk to public safety and
property. Such hazards include premature and accidental detonations,
dangerous projectiles, and falling or burning debris.
C. Discussion of Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port
Buffalo has determined that this temporary safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of spectators and vessels during the Barbara Harder
Wedding Fireworks. This zone will be effective and enforced from 9 p.m.
until 11 p.m. on July 7, 2012. This zone will encompass all waters of
Lake Erie, Lake View, NY within a 560 foot radius of position
42[deg]43'17.8'' N and 78[deg]57'54.2'' W (NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. Executive Order
12866 or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of
Management and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this rule is
not a significant regulatory action because we anticipate that it will
have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other
agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan
recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The
safety zone created by this rule will be relatively small and enforced
for relatively short time. Also, the safety zone is designed to
minimize its impact on navigable waters. Furthermore, the safety zone
has been designed to allow vessels to transit around it. Thus,
restrictions on vessel movement within that particular area are
expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may
still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of
the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 39639]]
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Lake Erie on the evening of July
7, 2012.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
safety zone would be activated, and thus subject to enforcement, for
only two hours late in the day. Traffic may be allowed to pass through
the zone with the permission of the Captain of the Port. The Captain of
the Port can be reached via VHF channel 16. Before the activation of
the zone, we would issue local Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
9. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public
Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-00568 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0568 Safety Zone; Barbara Harder Wedding Fireworks, Lake
Erie, Lake View, NY.
(a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake
Erie, Lake View, NY within a 560 foot radius of position
42[deg]43'17.8'' N and 78[deg]57'54.2'' W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period. This regulation is effective
and will be enforced on July 7, 2012 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
[[Page 39640]]
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his
behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.
Dated: June 21, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2012-16452 Filed 7-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P