Census Bureau, 39678-39679 [2012-16389]
Download as PDF
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
39678
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2012 / Notices
these addresses, if needed, at the time
of enumeration.
SC–901, Special Census Address
Listing Notes Page—This form will be
used by the enumerator to write notes
about any extenuating circumstances
regarding the listing of an address found
on the SC–920, Address Listing Page.
The Enumerator will use the line
number from the Address Listing page
and note any issues encountered that
might need further explanation
regarding the unit/address.
SC–921(HU), Special Census Housing
Unit Add Page—This form will be used
by enumerators to add housing units
(HUs) that are observed to exist on the
ground, that are not contained on the
address listing page.
SC–921(GQ), Special Census Group
Quarter Add Page—This form will be
used by enumerators to add Group
Quarters (GQs) that are observed to exist
on the ground, that are not contained on
the address listing page.
SC–921(TU), Special Census
Transitory Unit Add Page—This form
will be used by enumerators to add
Transitory Units (e.g., hotels, motels, RV
parks, marinas) that are observed to
exist on the ground, that are not
contained on the address listing page.
SC–1(F), Special Census Information
Sheet—This sheet contains the
Confidentiality Notice and the Flash
Card information for use at Housing
Units. The Confidentiality Notice is
required by the Privacy Act of 1974. The
Flash Card portion of the Information
Sheet shows the set of flashcards that
will be shown to respondents as an aid
in answering certain questions. Special
Census field staffs are required by law
to give an Information Sheet to each
person from whom they request censusrelated information.
SC–31/SC–31(S), Special Census
Group Quarters Information Sheet—
This sheet contains the Confidentiality
Notice and the Flashcard information
for use at Group Quarters. The
Confidentiality Notice is required by the
Privacy Act of 1974. The Flash-card
portion of the Information Sheet shows
the set of flashcards that will be shown
to respondents as an aid in answering
certain questions. Special Census field
staffs are required by law to give an
Information Sheet to each person from
whom they request special census
related information.
SC–26, Special Census Notice of Visit
Form—This form is the form that
enumerators will leave at addresses
where they are not able to make contact.
The notice indicates that a special
census enumerator was there and will
return to conduct an interview. It also
provides a telephone number that the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Jul 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
respondent can use to contact the
enumerator and/or the Special Census
Office.
SC–3309, Language Identification
Flashcard—This form will be used by
enumerators to identify the language
spoken by a respondent when a
language barrier is encountered.
The Census Bureau will establish a
reimbursable agreement with a variety
of potential special census customers
that are unknown at this time. The
Special Census Program will include a
library of standard forms that will be
used for the Special Censuses we
anticipate conducting throughout this
decade. While no additional
documentation will be provided to OMB
in advance of conducting any Special
Census which utilizes the library of
standard forms, any deviation from the
standard forms, such as an additional
question requested by a specific
governmental unit, will be forwarded to
OMB for approval. In addition, the
Special Census program will provide
OMB an annual report summarizing the
activity for the year.
Local jurisdictions determine the
need for and uses of their special census
data. Some governmental units request
a special census for proper
infrastructure planning and others make
a request because they must have the
updated data to qualify for some sources
of funding. Local governmental units
use special census data to apply for
available funds from both the state and
Federal governments. Many states
distribute these funds based on Census
Bureau population statistics. This fact,
along with local population shifts or
annexations of territory, prompts local
officials to request special censuses. In
addition, special census data are used
by the local jurisdictions to plan new
schools, transportation systems, housing
programs, water treatment facilities, etc.
The Census Bureau also uses special
census data as part of its local
population estimates calculation and to
update the Census Bureau’s Master
Address File (MAF) and
Topographically Integrated Geographic
Encoding and Referencing (TIGER)
System.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Frequency: One time.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., Section
196.
OMB Desk Officer: Brian HarrisKojetin, (202) 395–7314.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Jennifer Jessup,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
jjessup@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Brian Harris-Kojetin, OMB
Desk Officer either by fax (202–395–
7245) or email (bharrisk@omb.eop.gov).
Dated: June 29, 2012.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–16387 Filed 7–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; 2013 Current
Population Survey Annual Social and
Economic Supplement Content Test
U.S. Census Bureau,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before September 4, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at jjessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Brian O’Hara, Social and
Economic Housing Statistics Division,
U.S. Census Bureau, 301–763–3196 (or
via the Internet at
brian.j.ohara@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The Current Population Survey (CPS)
Annual Social and Economic
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2012 / Notices
Supplement (ASEC) is used to produce
official estimates of income and poverty,
and it serves as the most widely-cited
source of estimates on health insurance
and the uninsured. These statistics have
far-ranging implications for policy and
funding decisions. Alternative sets of
questions on income and health
insurance have been developed and are
now slated for a large-scale field test to
evaluate the questions and the estimates
they generate.
With regard to income, the CPS ASEC
was converted to computer assisted
interviewing (CAI) in 1994. This
conversion, essentially, took the
questions and skip patterns of the paper
questionnaire, and put them on a
computer screen. Automated data
collection methods allow for
complicated skips, respondent-specific
question wording, and carry-over of data
from one interview to the next. The
computerized questionnaire also
permits the inclusion of several built-in
editing features, including automatic
checks for internal consistency and
unlikely responses, and verification of
answers. With these built-in editing
features, errors can be caught and
corrected during the interview itself. It
has been more than 30 years since the
last major redesign of the income
questions of this questionnaire (1980),
and the need to modernize this survey
to take advantage of CAI technologies
has become more and more apparent.
Regarding health insurance, the CPS
ASEC health insurance questions have
measurement error due to both the
reference period and timing of data
collection. Qualitative research has
shown that some respondents do not
focus on the calendar year reference
period, but rather report on their current
insurance status. Quantitative studies
have shown that those with more recent
coverage are more likely to report
accurately than those with coverage in
the distant past. A new set of integrated
questions on both current and past
calendar year status should produce
more accurate estimates of past year
coverage. This is because the current
coverage status questions may serve as
an anchor to elicit more accurate reports
of past year coverage than the standard
methodology.
In addition to making improvements
to the core set of questions on health
insurance, in 2014 the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act
(PPACA) is set to go into effect. One of
the main features of the PPACA is the
‘‘Health Insurance Exchange.’’ These are
joint federal-state partnerships designed
to create a marketplace of private health
insurance options for individuals and
small businesses. While these
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Jul 03, 2012
Jkt 226001
Exchanges are still in development and
states have broad flexibility in designing
the programs, it is essential for the
federal government to have a viable
methodology in place when the PPACA
goes into effect to measure Exchange
participation, and to measure types of
health coverage (in general) in the postreform era.
Lastly, the point-in-time health
insurance questions lend themselves to
additional questions concerning
whether the current employer offered
the respondent health insurance
coverage. Although this set of questions
is new to the CPS ASEC, it has been in
CPS production in the Contingent
Worker Supplement (CWS). The CWS
was fielded in February of 1995, 1997,
1999, 2001 and 2005.
The overarching purpose of the 2013
CPS ASEC Content Test is to evaluate
the following:
• Customization of income questions
to fit specific demographic groups
• Ask recipiency and amounts
separately
• Use better targeted questions for
certain income types that are currently
not well reported
• Improve health insurance questions
by using a new method of collection
• New content on a new way for
people to get income-related subsidies
for health insurance coverage
• New content on employer-provided
health insurance
II. Method of Collection
The 2013 field test is expected to be
conducted using a CATI instrument by
Census Bureau interviewers located in
three telephone interviewing facilities
(in Hagerstown, Maryland;
Jeffersonville, Indiana; and Tucson,
Arizona).
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
15,000 households.
Estimated Time per Response: 40
minutes per household.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 10,000 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: Except
for their time, there is no cost to
respondents.
Respondent Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Section 182 of Title
13 of the United States Code.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39679
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 29, 2012.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–16389 Filed 7–3–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 120620179–2179–01]
Request for Public Comments on
Shipping Tolerances for Export
Licenses Issued by the Bureau of
Industry and Security
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of inquiry.
AGENCY:
Numerous exporters have
expressed interest in establishing an
automatic calculation through the
Automated Export System (AES) of the
shipping tolerance for licenses issued by
the Bureau of Industry and Security
(BIS) to enhance exporter compliance
with the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR). In addition,
automatic calculation would assist in
achieving the goals of the President’s
Export Control Reform (ECR) initiative
to harmonize the control lists of the
Departments of Commerce and State,
and with the transfer of militarily less
significant defense articles from the
United States Munitions List (USML) to
the Commerce Control List (CCL), by
making the transfer smoother for
exporters since automatic calculation of
shipping tolerances is already in place
for the primary licenses issued by the
Department of State (DSP–5 licenses).
BIS seeks public comment to help it
ascertain if changes should be made to
its shipping tolerance regulations in
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 129 (Thursday, July 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39678-39679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16389]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; 2013 Current
Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement Content
Test
AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on
or before September 4, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at jjessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions
should be directed to Brian O'Hara, Social and Economic Housing
Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau, 301-763-3196 (or via the
Internet at brian.j.ohara@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Current Population Survey (CPS) Annual Social and Economic
[[Page 39679]]
Supplement (ASEC) is used to produce official estimates of income and
poverty, and it serves as the most widely-cited source of estimates on
health insurance and the uninsured. These statistics have far-ranging
implications for policy and funding decisions. Alternative sets of
questions on income and health insurance have been developed and are
now slated for a large-scale field test to evaluate the questions and
the estimates they generate.
With regard to income, the CPS ASEC was converted to computer
assisted interviewing (CAI) in 1994. This conversion, essentially, took
the questions and skip patterns of the paper questionnaire, and put
them on a computer screen. Automated data collection methods allow for
complicated skips, respondent-specific question wording, and carry-over
of data from one interview to the next. The computerized questionnaire
also permits the inclusion of several built-in editing features,
including automatic checks for internal consistency and unlikely
responses, and verification of answers. With these built-in editing
features, errors can be caught and corrected during the interview
itself. It has been more than 30 years since the last major redesign of
the income questions of this questionnaire (1980), and the need to
modernize this survey to take advantage of CAI technologies has become
more and more apparent.
Regarding health insurance, the CPS ASEC health insurance questions
have measurement error due to both the reference period and timing of
data collection. Qualitative research has shown that some respondents
do not focus on the calendar year reference period, but rather report
on their current insurance status. Quantitative studies have shown that
those with more recent coverage are more likely to report accurately
than those with coverage in the distant past. A new set of integrated
questions on both current and past calendar year status should produce
more accurate estimates of past year coverage. This is because the
current coverage status questions may serve as an anchor to elicit more
accurate reports of past year coverage than the standard methodology.
In addition to making improvements to the core set of questions on
health insurance, in 2014 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (PPACA) is set to go into effect. One of the main features of the
PPACA is the ``Health Insurance Exchange.'' These are joint federal-
state partnerships designed to create a marketplace of private health
insurance options for individuals and small businesses. While these
Exchanges are still in development and states have broad flexibility in
designing the programs, it is essential for the federal government to
have a viable methodology in place when the PPACA goes into effect to
measure Exchange participation, and to measure types of health coverage
(in general) in the post-reform era.
Lastly, the point-in-time health insurance questions lend
themselves to additional questions concerning whether the current
employer offered the respondent health insurance coverage. Although
this set of questions is new to the CPS ASEC, it has been in CPS
production in the Contingent Worker Supplement (CWS). The CWS was
fielded in February of 1995, 1997, 1999, 2001 and 2005.
The overarching purpose of the 2013 CPS ASEC Content Test is to
evaluate the following:
Customization of income questions to fit specific
demographic groups
Ask recipiency and amounts separately
Use better targeted questions for certain income types
that are currently not well reported
Improve health insurance questions by using a new method
of collection
New content on a new way for people to get income-related
subsidies for health insurance coverage
New content on employer-provided health insurance
II. Method of Collection
The 2013 field test is expected to be conducted using a CATI
instrument by Census Bureau interviewers located in three telephone
interviewing facilities (in Hagerstown, Maryland; Jeffersonville,
Indiana; and Tucson, Arizona).
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or households.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 15,000 households.
Estimated Time per Response: 40 minutes per household.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 10,000 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: Except for their time, there is no
cost to respondents.
Respondent Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Section 182 of Title 13 of the United States Code.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: June 29, 2012.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-16389 Filed 7-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P