Safety Zone; Head of the Cuyahoga and U.S. Rowing Masters Head Race National Championship, Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH, 39453-39456 [2012-16259]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Mary W. Lyons, (202) 622–3860; and
David A. Levine, (202) 622–3860, and
regarding the submission of public
comments and the public hearing,
Ms. Oluwafunmilayo (Funmi) Taylor, at
(202) 622–7180 (not toll-free numbers).
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0109]
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
Background
RIN 1625—AA08
The notice of proposed rulemaking by
cross-reference to temporary regulations
(REG–107889–12) that is the subject of
this correction is under section 7874 of
the Internal Revenue Code.
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Temporary Change of Dates
for Recurring Marine Events in the
Fifth Coast Guard District, Bogue
Sound; Morehead City, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
Need for Correction
As published, REG–107889–12,
contains an error that may prove to be
misleading and is in need of
clarification.
Correction of Publication
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Accordingly, the publication of the
correction to a notice of proposed
rulemaking by cross-reference to
temporary regulations (REG–107889–
12), which was the subject of FR. Doc.
2012–14238, is corrected as follows:
On page 34887, column 3, in the
preamble, under the paragraph heading
‘‘Special Analyses:’’, the paragraph is
replaced in its entirety, and is corrected
to read ‘‘It has been determined that this
notice of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to the regulations, and because the
regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) do
not apply. Accordingly, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,
the regulations have been submitted to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for
comment on their impact on small
business.’’
LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2012–16236 Filed 7–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Jul 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its proposed rule
concerning a temporary change of the
enforcement period for a special local
regulation of a recurring marine event in
the Fifth Coast Guard District. The
proposed rule was initiated to alter the
date of the ‘‘Crystal Coast Super Boat
Grand Prix,’’ conducted on the waters of
Bogue Sound near Morehead City, North
Carolina. No new rulemaking will be
initiated on this matter; rather, the event
will be held as detailed in the existing
regulation.
DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn
on July 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
withdrawn rulemaking is available for
inspection or copying at the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2012–0109 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice,
call or email BOSN3 Joseph M. Edge,
Coast Guard Sector North Carolina,
Coast Guard; telephone 252–247–4525,
email Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing material in
the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On March 15, 2012, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking entitled
’’Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Temporary Change of Dates for
Recurring Marine Events in the Fifth
Coast Guard District, Bogue Sound;
Morehead City, NC’’ in the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39453
Register (77 FR 15320). The proposed
rulemaking would have altered the
period of enforcement of the Special
Local Regulation listed in 33 CFR
100.501(d)(3). The subject event was
going to be rescheduled from the fourth
or last Sunday in September to the third
Saturday and Sunday in September. The
proposed regulation would have closed
a portion of the waters of Bogue Sound
to vessel traffic during the boat race
during the altered period of
enforcement. No other changes to the
underlying regulation were proposed.
Withdrawal
The sponsor of the ‘‘Crystal Coast
Super Boat Grand Prix’’ has informed
the Coast Guard that he will hold the
event on a date within the limitations
published and listed in 33 CFR
100.501(d)(3).
Authority
We issue this notice of withdrawal
under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a),
44 U.S.C. 1505(a)(3), and 33 CFR
1.05–1.
Dated: June 11, 2012.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2012–16293 Filed 7–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0569]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Head of the Cuyahoga
and U.S. Rowing Masters Head Race
National Championship, Cuyahoga
River, Cleveland, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on the
Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH. This
proposed rule is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Cuyahoga
River during the Head of the Cuyahoga
and the U.S. Rowing Masters Head Race
International Championship. The safety
zone established by this proposed rule
is necessary to protect spectators,
participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with rowing regattas.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 2, 2012.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
39454
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT Christopher Mercurio, Chief of
Waterway Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716–
843–9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
HOTC Head of the Cuyahoga
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Jul 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2012–0569) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2012–0569) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Head of the Cuyahoga (HOTC)
rowing regatta has occurred annually for
over a decade. In response to past years’
events, the Coast Guard has established
a temporary safety zone to protect the
boating public. For example, in 2011,
the Captain of the Port Buffalo
published a temporary final rule (76 FR
56638) to ensure the safety of spectators
and vessels during the rowing event.
The safety zone proposed in this Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) is
identical in size, location, and effect as
that established by the 2011 TFR. This
NPRM was not preceded by an Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(ANPRM), and thus no public comments
have yet to be received.
C. Basis and Purpose
As mentioned in the ‘‘Regulatory
History and Information’’ section, the
HOTC is an annual rowing regatta that
has taken place for over a decade. The
HOTC takes place on the Cuyahoga
River along a 4800 meter course and
attracts numerous rowing clubs and
programs from across the U.S.
Typically, the event occurs on the third
Saturday of September between the
hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. In
2012, for instance, the HOTC will occur
between 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on
September 15, 2012.
Following the HOTC on the 15th of
September, the U.S. Rowing Masters
Head Race National Championship will
take place on September 16th along the
same portion of the Cuyahoga River.
The National Championship will feature
racing in both sweep and sculling
events.
The Captain of the Port Buffalo has
determined that the HOTC and the U.S.
Rowing Masters Head Race National
Championship rowing events present
significant hazards to public spectators
and participants.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in
mind, the Captain of the Port Buffalo
proposes to establish a temporary safety
zone that will ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels during the HOTC
and during the U.S. Rowing Masters
Head Race National Championship. The
proposed safety zone would be effective
and enforced from 6:30 a.m. until 4:30
p.m. on September 15 and 16, 2012.
The proposed safety zone will
encompass all waters of the Cuyahoga
River, Cleveland, OH from a line drawn
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
perpendicular from position 41°28′32″
N, 081°40′16″ W (NAD 83) just south of
the Interstate 490 bridge, north to the
Detroit-Superior Viaduct bridge.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the proposed safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his onscene representative. The Captain of the
Port or his on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will
not interfere with other agencies, will
not adversely alter the budget of any
grant or loan recipients, and will not
raise any novel legal or policy issues.
The safety zone created by this
proposed rule will be relatively small
and enforced for relatively short time.
Also, the safety zone is designed to
minimize its impact on navigable
waters. Furthermore, the safety zone has
been designed to allow vessels to transit
around it. Thus, restrictions on vessel
movement within that particular area
are expected to be minimal. Under
certain conditions, moreover, vessels
may still transit through the safety zone
when permitted by the Captain of the
Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed
rule may affect the following entities,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Jul 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
some of which might be small entities:
The owners of operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a
portion of the Cuyahoga River near
Cleveland, Ohio between 6:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. on September 15 and 16,
2012.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This safety zone
would be activated, and thus subject to
enforcement, for only 9 and a half hours
each day for two days. Although the
safety zone would apply to the entire
width of the river, traffic would be
allowed to pass through the zone with
the permission of the Captain of the
Port. Before the activation of the zone,
we would issue maritime advisories
widely available to users of the river.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39455
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
9. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
39456
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
11. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use because it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely
to have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
12. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This proposed rule
does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use
of voluntary consensus standards.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
13. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a
safety zone and, therefore it is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A
preliminary environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Jul 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 20, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2012–16259 Filed 7–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
40 CFR Part 52
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0569 to read as
follows:
[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0376; FRL–9696–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Delaware; Section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the
2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
§ 165.T09–0569 Safety Zone; Head of the
Cuyahoga and U.S. Rowing Masters Head
Race National Championship, Cuyahoga
River, Cleveland, OH.
AGENCY:
(a) Location. The proposed safety
zone will encompass all waters of the
Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH from a
line drawn perpendicular from position
41°28′32″ N, 081°40′16″ W (NAD 83)
just south of the Interstate 490 bridge,
north to the Detroit-Superior Viaduct
bridge.
(b) Effective and enforcement period.
This regulation is effective and will be
enforced on September 15 and 16, 2012
from 6:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
EPA is proposing to approve
a submittal from the State of Delaware
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA).
This submittal addresses the
infrastructure elements of the CAA,
necessary to implement, maintain, and
enforce the 2008 lead national ambient
air quality standards (NAAQS).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 2, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2012–0376 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: mastro.donna@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0376,
Donna Mastro, Acting Associate
Director, Office of Air Program
Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2012–
0376. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39453-39456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16259]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0569]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Head of the Cuyahoga and U.S. Rowing Masters Head
Race National Championship, Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH. This proposed rule is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of the Cuyahoga River during the Head
of the Cuyahoga and the U.S. Rowing Masters Head Race International
Championship. The safety zone established by this proposed rule is
necessary to protect spectators, participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with rowing regattas.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 2, 2012.
[[Page 39454]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT Christopher Mercurio, Chief of Waterway Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
HOTC Head of the Cuyahoga
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0569) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0569) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Head of the Cuyahoga (HOTC) rowing regatta has occurred
annually for over a decade. In response to past years' events, the
Coast Guard has established a temporary safety zone to protect the
boating public. For example, in 2011, the Captain of the Port Buffalo
published a temporary final rule (76 FR 56638) to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels during the rowing event. The safety zone
proposed in this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) is identical in
size, location, and effect as that established by the 2011 TFR. This
NPRM was not preceded by an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(ANPRM), and thus no public comments have yet to be received.
C. Basis and Purpose
As mentioned in the ``Regulatory History and Information'' section,
the HOTC is an annual rowing regatta that has taken place for over a
decade. The HOTC takes place on the Cuyahoga River along a 4800 meter
course and attracts numerous rowing clubs and programs from across the
U.S. Typically, the event occurs on the third Saturday of September
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. In 2012, for instance, the
HOTC will occur between 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on September 15, 2012.
Following the HOTC on the 15th of September, the U.S. Rowing
Masters Head Race National Championship will take place on September
16th along the same portion of the Cuyahoga River. The National
Championship will feature racing in both sweep and sculling events.
The Captain of the Port Buffalo has determined that the HOTC and
the U.S. Rowing Masters Head Race National Championship rowing events
present significant hazards to public spectators and participants.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port
Buffalo proposes to establish a temporary safety zone that will ensure
the safety of spectators and vessels during the HOTC and during the
U.S. Rowing Masters Head Race National Championship. The proposed
safety zone would be effective and enforced from 6:30 a.m. until 4:30
p.m. on September 15 and 16, 2012.
The proposed safety zone will encompass all waters of the Cuyahoga
River, Cleveland, OH from a line drawn
[[Page 39455]]
perpendicular from position 41[deg]28'32'' N, 081[deg]40'16'' W (NAD
83) just south of the Interstate 490 bridge, north to the Detroit-
Superior Viaduct bridge.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the proposed safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action because we anticipate that
it will have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with
other agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or
loan recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues.
The safety zone created by this proposed rule will be relatively small
and enforced for relatively short time. Also, the safety zone is
designed to minimize its impact on navigable waters. Furthermore, the
safety zone has been designed to allow vessels to transit around it.
Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within that particular area are
expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may
still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of
the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This proposed rule may affect the following entities,
some of which might be small entities: The owners of operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the Cuyahoga
River near Cleveland, Ohio between 6:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on September
15 and 16, 2012.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
safety zone would be activated, and thus subject to enforcement, for
only 9 and a half hours each day for two days. Although the safety zone
would apply to the entire width of the river, traffic would be allowed
to pass through the zone with the permission of the Captain of the
Port. Before the activation of the zone, we would issue maritime
advisories widely available to users of the river.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
9. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
[[Page 39456]]
11. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use because it is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and
is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
12. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This proposed rule does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and, therefore it is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination
are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0569 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0569 Safety Zone; Head of the Cuyahoga and U.S. Rowing
Masters Head Race National Championship, Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH.
(a) Location. The proposed safety zone will encompass all waters of
the Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH from a line drawn perpendicular from
position 41[deg]28'32'' N, 081[deg]40'16'' W (NAD 83) just south of the
Interstate 490 bridge, north to the Detroit-Superior Viaduct bridge.
(b) Effective and enforcement period. This regulation is effective
and will be enforced on September 15 and 16, 2012 from 6:30 a.m. until
4:30 p.m.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his
behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.
Dated: June 20, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2012-16259 Filed 7-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P