Final Environmental Impact Statement on the Denali Park Road Vehicle Management Plan, Denali National Park and Preserve, 39253-39254 [2012-16070]
Download as PDF
39253
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 127 / Monday, July 2, 2012 / Notices
you are interested in presenting
information at this public meeting,
contact the Council Coordinator no later
than the date under DATES.
Meeting
The Council will consider U.S.
standard grant proposals at the meeting
announced in DATES. The Commission
will consider the Council’s
recommendations at its meeting
tentatively scheduled for September 12,
2012.
PUBLIC INPUT
If you wish to . . .
You must contact the
Council Coordinator (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) no later
than . . .
Attend the Council meeting,
Submit written information or questions before the Council meeting for consideration during the meeting,
Give an oral presentation during the Council meeting,
July 26, 2012.
July 26, 2012.
July 26, 2012.
Submitting Written Information or
Questions
copies may be purchased for the cost of
duplication.
Interested members of the public may
submit relevant information or
questions for the Council to consider
during the public meeting. If you wish
to submit a written statement, so that
the information may be made available
to the Council for their consideration
prior to this meeting, you must contact
the Council Coordinator by the date
above. Written statements must be
supplied to the Council Coordinator in
both of the following formats: One hard
copy with original signature, and one
electronic copy via email (acceptable
file formats are Adobe Acrobat PDF, MS
Word, MS PowerPoint, or rich text file).
Dated: June 22, 2012.
James B. Bortner,
Acting Assistant Director, Migratory Birds.
Giving an Oral Presentation
AGENCY:
Individuals or groups requesting to
make an oral presentation at the Council
meeting will be limited to 2 minutes per
speaker, with no more than a total of 30
minutes for all speakers. Interested
parties should contact the Council
Coordinator by the date above, in
writing (preferably via email; see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), to be
placed on the public speaker list for
either of these meeting. Nonregistered
public speakers will not be considered
during the Council meeting. Registered
speakers who wish to expand upon their
oral statements, or those who had
wished to speak but could not be
accommodated on the agenda, are
invited to submit written statements to
the Council within 30 days following
the meeting.
ACTION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Meeting Minutes
Summary minutes of the Council and
meeting will be maintained by the
Council Coordinator at the address
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Council meeting minutes will
be posted at https://www.fws.gov/
birdhabitat/Grants/NAWCA/
CouncilAct.shtm#CouncilMeet within
30 days following the meeting. Personal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:14 Jun 29, 2012
Jkt 226001
[FR Doc. 2012–16094 Filed 6–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
[NPS–AKR–DENA–10132; 9833–P807–579]
Final Environmental Impact Statement
on the Denali Park Road Vehicle
Management Plan, Denali National
Park and Preserve
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Availability of the
Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the Denali Park Road Vehicle
Management Plan.
Pursuant to § 102(2)(C) the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C),
the National Park Service (NPS)
announces the availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the
Denali Park Road Vehicle Management
Plan (Plan/FEIS), for Denali National
Park and Preserve, Alaska. The Plan/
FEIS evaluates the environmental
impacts of three action alternatives
including a preferred alternative. A no
action alternative is also evaluated. The
restricted section of the Denali Park
Road begins at the west end of the
Savage River Bridge (mile 14.8) and
continues to the former Mt. McKinley
National Park boundary north of
Wonder Lake (mile 87.9).
ADDRESSES: The Plan/FEIS is available
in electronic format online at the NPS
Planning, Environmental and Public
Comment Web site at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/dena. Hard
copies and compact discs of the Plan/
FEIS are available on request by
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contacting: Paul R. Anderson,
Superintendent, Denali National Park
and Preserve, P.O. Box 9, Denali Park,
Alaska 99755. Telephone: 907–683–
2294.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the FEIS is to evaluate the
impacts of the alternatives for managing
vehicle use along the Denali Park Road.
Since the mid-1920s, visitors have been
able to travel the park road on buses
operated by the park concessioner.
Starting in 1972, when private vehicle
traffic was restricted beyond mile 15 of
the road, a shuttle bus service was
added for visitor transportation. The
present approach for managing vehicles
on the park road is based on the park’s
1986 general management plan, which
established a seasonal limit of 10, 512
vehicle permits beyond mile 15 between
approximately Memorial Day and a
week after Labor Day [36 CFR 13.932].
It has served well as a way to manage
vehicle use, while providing high
quality visitor opportunities to see
wildlife in natural habitats and to access
the park’s wilderness. However,
visitation to Denali National Park and
Preserve is expected to continue to
increase, and with it demand for visits
along the park road.
A 90-day public comment period on
the Draft EIS (DEIS) began on July 29,
2011. Public meetings were held in
Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Denali
National Park, Alaska. The NPS
received 324 comment letters from
various agencies, organizations and
individuals. In response to public
comment, the FEIS describes and
analyzes a fourth alternative (NPS
Preferred Alternative) that combines
elements of Alternatives A, B and C
from the DEIS. The FEIS presents
responses to substantive comments in
Chapter 5.
The Plan/FEIS analyzes the following
four alternatives: the No Action
Alternative (Alternative A), Maximizing
Visitor Opportunities (Alternative B),
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
39254
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 127 / Monday, July 2, 2012 / Notices
Maximizing Visitor Opportunities
(Alternative C), and the NPS Preferred
Alternative (Alternative D).
Alternative A: (No Action): This
alternative would continue current
management of vehicle use on the park
road. In addition to a seasonal limit of
10,512 vehicles past mile 15, there
would continue to be specific seasonal
and daily limits to tour buses, shuttle
buses, inholder traffic, professional
photographer vehicles, NPS
administrative vehicles and other
categories of vehicles.
Alternative B: This alternative would
use an adaptive management framework
for vehicle use based on indicators and
standards for visitor experiences and
resource protection. While adhering to
these standards, management would
promote maximized seating on all
transit and tour vehicles to offer the
largest number of visitors the
opportunity to travel the park road. This
adaptive management framework would
include options for reducing or
scheduling non-bus traffic to allow for
additional visitor use on transit and tour
vehicles.
Alternative C: This alternative would
use an adaptive management framework
for vehicle use based on indicators and
standards for visitor experiences and
resource protection. While adhering to
these standards, management would
promote a wide variety of opportunities
that would include brief experiences in
the park’s entrance area, short visits
along segments of the park road, special
interest tours, and multi-day
experiences in the park’s backcountry.
This adaptive management framework
would include options for reducing or
scheduling non-bus traffic to allow for
additional visitor use on transit and tour
vehicles.
Alternative D: The NPS preferred
alternative, with an adaptive manage
framework, would provide a high
quality visitor experience; protect
wilderness resource values, scenic
values, wildlife, and other park
resources; and maintain the unique
character of the park road. While
managing to meet standards for desired
conditions, a maximum daily capacity
would also be used to protect park
resources and values. The daily capacity
would apply to all vehicles traveling
west of the Savage River check station
(mile 15).
Paul
R. Anderson, Superintendent, Denali
National Park and Preserve, P.O. Box 9,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:14 Jun 29, 2012
Jkt 226001
Denali Park, Alaska 99755. Telephone:
907–683–2294.
Sue E. Masica,
Regional Director, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2012–16070 Filed 6–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–PF–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–873–875, 878–
880, and 882 (Second Review)]
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia,
Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine;
Institution of Five-Year Reviews
Concerning the Antidumping Duty
Orders on Steel Concrete Reinforcing
Bar From Belarus, China, Indonesia,
Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted reviews
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)
to determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on steel
concrete reinforcing bar from Belarus,
China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova,
Poland, and Ukraine would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury. Pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties
are requested to respond to this notice
by submitting the information specified
below to the Commission; 1 to be
assured of consideration, the deadline
for responses is August 1, 2012.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by
September 14, 2012. For further
information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207), as most recently
amended at 74 FR 2847 (January 16,
2009).
DATES: Effective Date: July 2, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
SUMMARY:
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 12–5–272,
expiration date June 30, 2014. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
20436.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On September 7, 2001,
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) issued antidumping duty
orders on imports of steel concrete
reinforcing bar from Belarus, China,
Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and
Ukraine (66 FR 46777). Following the
five-year reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective August 9, 2007,
Commerce issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty orders on imports of
steel concrete reinforcing bar from
Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia,
Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine (72 FR
44830). The Commission is now
conducting second reviews to determine
whether revocation of the orders would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to the
domestic industry within a reasonably
foreseeable time. It will assess the
adequacy of interested party responses
to this notice of institution to determine
whether to conduct full reviews or
expedited reviews. The Commission’s
determinations in any expedited
reviews will be based on the facts
available, which may include
information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions. The following definitions
apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year reviews, as
defined by Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these
reviews are Belarus, China, Indonesia,
Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original
determinations and its full first five-year
reviews, the Commission defined the
Domestic Like Product as certain steel
concrete reinforcing bar, coextensive
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39253-39254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16070]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
[NPS-AKR-DENA-10132; 9833-P807-579]
Final Environmental Impact Statement on the Denali Park Road
Vehicle Management Plan, Denali National Park and Preserve
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the Denali Park Road Vehicle Management Plan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Sec. 102(2)(C) the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the Denali Park Road Vehicle Management Plan (Plan/FEIS),
for Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. The Plan/FEIS evaluates
the environmental impacts of three action alternatives including a
preferred alternative. A no action alternative is also evaluated. The
restricted section of the Denali Park Road begins at the west end of
the Savage River Bridge (mile 14.8) and continues to the former Mt.
McKinley National Park boundary north of Wonder Lake (mile 87.9).
ADDRESSES: The Plan/FEIS is available in electronic format online at
the NPS Planning, Environmental and Public Comment Web site at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/dena. Hard copies and compact discs of the Plan/
FEIS are available on request by contacting: Paul R. Anderson,
Superintendent, Denali National Park and Preserve, P.O. Box 9, Denali
Park, Alaska 99755. Telephone: 907-683-2294.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the FEIS is to evaluate the
impacts of the alternatives for managing vehicle use along the Denali
Park Road. Since the mid-1920s, visitors have been able to travel the
park road on buses operated by the park concessioner. Starting in 1972,
when private vehicle traffic was restricted beyond mile 15 of the road,
a shuttle bus service was added for visitor transportation. The present
approach for managing vehicles on the park road is based on the park's
1986 general management plan, which established a seasonal limit of 10,
512 vehicle permits beyond mile 15 between approximately Memorial Day
and a week after Labor Day [36 CFR 13.932]. It has served well as a way
to manage vehicle use, while providing high quality visitor
opportunities to see wildlife in natural habitats and to access the
park's wilderness. However, visitation to Denali National Park and
Preserve is expected to continue to increase, and with it demand for
visits along the park road.
A 90-day public comment period on the Draft EIS (DEIS) began on
July 29, 2011. Public meetings were held in Anchorage, Fairbanks, and
Denali National Park, Alaska. The NPS received 324 comment letters from
various agencies, organizations and individuals. In response to public
comment, the FEIS describes and analyzes a fourth alternative (NPS
Preferred Alternative) that combines elements of Alternatives A, B and
C from the DEIS. The FEIS presents responses to substantive comments in
Chapter 5.
The Plan/FEIS analyzes the following four alternatives: the No
Action Alternative (Alternative A), Maximizing Visitor Opportunities
(Alternative B),
[[Page 39254]]
Maximizing Visitor Opportunities (Alternative C), and the NPS Preferred
Alternative (Alternative D).
Alternative A: (No Action): This alternative would continue current
management of vehicle use on the park road. In addition to a seasonal
limit of 10,512 vehicles past mile 15, there would continue to be
specific seasonal and daily limits to tour buses, shuttle buses,
inholder traffic, professional photographer vehicles, NPS
administrative vehicles and other categories of vehicles.
Alternative B: This alternative would use an adaptive management
framework for vehicle use based on indicators and standards for visitor
experiences and resource protection. While adhering to these standards,
management would promote maximized seating on all transit and tour
vehicles to offer the largest number of visitors the opportunity to
travel the park road. This adaptive management framework would include
options for reducing or scheduling non-bus traffic to allow for
additional visitor use on transit and tour vehicles.
Alternative C: This alternative would use an adaptive management
framework for vehicle use based on indicators and standards for visitor
experiences and resource protection. While adhering to these standards,
management would promote a wide variety of opportunities that would
include brief experiences in the park's entrance area, short visits
along segments of the park road, special interest tours, and multi-day
experiences in the park's backcountry. This adaptive management
framework would include options for reducing or scheduling non-bus
traffic to allow for additional visitor use on transit and tour
vehicles.
Alternative D: The NPS preferred alternative, with an adaptive
manage framework, would provide a high quality visitor experience;
protect wilderness resource values, scenic values, wildlife, and other
park resources; and maintain the unique character of the park road.
While managing to meet standards for desired conditions, a maximum
daily capacity would also be used to protect park resources and values.
The daily capacity would apply to all vehicles traveling west of the
Savage River check station (mile 15).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul R. Anderson, Superintendent,
Denali National Park and Preserve, P.O. Box 9, Denali Park, Alaska
99755. Telephone: 907-683-2294.
Sue E. Masica,
Regional Director, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2012-16070 Filed 6-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-PF-P