Safety Zone; Olcott Fireworks, Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY, 38492-38494 [2012-15825]
Download as PDF
38492
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
enforced on July 3, 2012 from 9:30 p.m.
until 11 p.m.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 12, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2012–15826 Filed 6–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
■
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0351]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
RIN 1625–AA00
2. Add § 165.T09–0356 to read as
follows:
AGENCY:
§ 165.T09–0356 Safety Zone; Mentor
Harbor Yachting Club, Lake Erie, Mentor,
OH.
SUMMARY:
■
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all waters of Lake Erie,
Mentor, NY within a 500 foot radius of
position 41°43′36″ N, and 081°21′09″ W
(NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This regulation is effective and will be
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Safety Zone; Olcott Fireworks, Lake
Ontario, Olcott, NY
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
The Coast Guard will
establish a temporary safety zone on
Lake Ontario, Olcott, New York. This
safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of Lake Ontario
during the Olcott fireworks on July 3,
2012. The safety zone is necessary to
protect participants, spectators, and
vessels from the hazards associated with
a firework display.
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
This regulation will be effective
July 3, 2012 from 9:30 p.m. until 11 p.m.
DATES:
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket [USCG–2012–0351]. To view
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ You may visit the Docket
Management Facility, Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email LT Christopher
Mercurio, Chief of Waterway
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Buffalo; telephone 716–843–9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory History and Information
On May 23, 2012, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zone; Olcott Fireworks,
Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY in the Federal
Register (77 FR 30451). We received no
letters commenting on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard is issuing this temporary final
rule less than 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register. Under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), an agency may issue a rule
less than 30 days before its effective
date when the agency for good cause
finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Accordingly, the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for publishing this temporary final rule
less than 30 days before its effective
date because delaying the effective date
of this temporary final rule would
prevent its enforcement on the
scheduled night of the event and thus,
would preclude the Coast Guard from
protecting spectators and vessels from
the hazards associated with a maritime
fireworks display.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
B. Basis and Purpose
Between 10 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. on
July 3, 2012, a fireworks display will be
held on the waters of Lake Ontario near
Olcott, NY. The Captain of the Port
Buffalo has determined that fireworks
launched proximate to watercraft pose a
significant risk to public safety and
property. Such hazards include
premature detonations, dangerous
detonations, dangerous projectiles, and
falling or burning debris.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
As mentioned above, no comments
were received from the public in
response to the NPRM that preceded
this temporary rule. Furthermore, there
were no changes made between the
proposed rule and this temporary final
rule. Thus, there are no comments and
no changes to discuss.
Just as was described in the NPRM,
the Captain of the Port Buffalo has
determined that a temporary safety zone
is necessary to ensure the safety of the
boating public during the Olcott
Fireworks. The safety zone will be
effective and enforced from 9:30 p.m.
until 11 p.m. on July 3, 2012. The safety
zone will encompass all waters of Lake
Ontario, Olcott, NY within a 1,120 FT
radius of position 43°20′23.57″ N,
78°43′09.50″ W (DATUM: NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port
or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this rule is not
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38493
a significant regulatory action because
we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The safety
zone created by this rule will be
relatively small and enforced for
relatively short time. Also, the safety
zone is designed to minimize its impact
on navigable waters. Furthermore, the
safety zone has been designed to allow
vessels to transit around it. Thus,
restrictions on vessel movement within
that particular area are expected to be
minimal. Under certain conditions,
moreover, vessels may still transit
through the safety zone when permitted
by the Captain of the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard received 0 comments from the
Small Business Administration on this
rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This temporary final rule may affect
the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of Lake Ontario
near Olcott, NY between 9:30 p.m. to
11 p.m. on July 3, 2012.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This safety zone
would be activated, and thus subject to
enforcement, for only 90 minutes late in
the day when vessel traffic is low.
Vessel traffic could pass safely around
the safety zone. Before the effective
period, maritime advisories will be
issued, which include a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
38494
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and thus,
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
9. Protection of Children
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0351 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0351 Safety Zone; Olcott
Fireworks, Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY.
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all waters of Lake Ontario,
Olcott, NY within an 1,120 FT radius of
position 43°20′23.57″ N and
78°43′09.50″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and enforcement period.
This regulation is effective and will be
enforced on July 3, 2012 from 9:30 p.m.
until 11 p.m.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 13, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo/
[FR Doc. 2012–15825 Filed 6–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38492-38494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15825]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0351]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Olcott Fireworks, Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will establish a temporary safety zone on Lake
Ontario, Olcott, New York. This safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of Lake Ontario during the Olcott fireworks on
July 3, 2012. The safety zone is necessary to protect participants,
spectators, and vessels from the hazards associated with a firework
display.
[[Page 38493]]
DATES: This regulation will be effective July 3, 2012 from 9:30 p.m.
until 11 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket [USCG-2012-0351]. To view documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available by going to https://www.regulations.gov, type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and
click ``SEARCH.'' You may visit the Docket Management Facility,
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email LT Christopher Mercurio, Chief of
Waterway Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-
843-9343, email SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
On May 23, 2012, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zone; Olcott Fireworks, Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY
in the Federal Register (77 FR 30451). We received no letters
commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and
none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard is issuing this temporary
final rule less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), an agency may issue a rule less than 30 days
before its effective date when the agency for good cause finds that
those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' Accordingly, the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for publishing this temporary final rule less than 30 days
before its effective date because delaying the effective date of this
temporary final rule would prevent its enforcement on the scheduled
night of the event and thus, would preclude the Coast Guard from
protecting spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with a
maritime fireworks display.
B. Basis and Purpose
Between 10 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. on July 3, 2012, a fireworks display
will be held on the waters of Lake Ontario near Olcott, NY. The Captain
of the Port Buffalo has determined that fireworks launched proximate to
watercraft pose a significant risk to public safety and property. Such
hazards include premature detonations, dangerous detonations, dangerous
projectiles, and falling or burning debris.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
As mentioned above, no comments were received from the public in
response to the NPRM that preceded this temporary rule. Furthermore,
there were no changes made between the proposed rule and this temporary
final rule. Thus, there are no comments and no changes to discuss.
Just as was described in the NPRM, the Captain of the Port Buffalo
has determined that a temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of the boating public during the Olcott Fireworks. The safety
zone will be effective and enforced from 9:30 p.m. until 11 p.m. on
July 3, 2012. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake
Ontario, Olcott, NY within a 1,120 FT radius of position
43[deg]20'23.57'' N, 78[deg]43'09.50'' W (DATUM: NAD 83). Entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his designated on-
scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this rule is
not a significant regulatory action because we anticipate that it will
have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other
agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan
recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The
safety zone created by this rule will be relatively small and enforced
for relatively short time. Also, the safety zone is designed to
minimize its impact on navigable waters. Furthermore, the safety zone
has been designed to allow vessels to transit around it. Thus,
restrictions on vessel movement within that particular area are
expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may
still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of
the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
received 0 comments from the Small Business Administration on this
rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This temporary final rule may affect the following entities, some
of which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of Lake Ontario near
Olcott, NY between 9:30 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 3, 2012.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
safety zone would be activated, and thus subject to enforcement, for
only 90 minutes late in the day when vessel traffic is low. Vessel
traffic could pass safely around the safety zone. Before the effective
period, maritime advisories will be issued, which include a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine
[[Page 38494]]
compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
9. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and
thus, is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0351 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0351 Safety Zone; Olcott Fireworks, Lake Ontario,
Olcott, NY.
(a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake
Ontario, Olcott, NY within an 1,120 FT radius of position
43[deg]20'23.57'' N and 78[deg]43'09.50'' W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and enforcement period. This regulation is effective
and will be enforced on July 3, 2012 from 9:30 p.m. until 11 p.m.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his
behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.
Dated: June 13, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo/
[FR Doc. 2012-15825 Filed 6-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P