Safety Zone; Richmond-Essex County Fourth of July Fireworks, Rappahannock River, Tappahannock, VA, 38497-38499 [2012-15817]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 12, 2012.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
Regulatory Information
[FR Doc. 2012–15820 Filed 6–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0300]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Richmond-Essex County
Fourth of July Fireworks,
Rappahannock River, Tappahannock,
VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard will
establish a temporary safety zone on the
Rappahannock River in the vicinity of
Tappahannock, VA to support the
Richmond-Essex County Fourth of July
Fireworks event. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during an aerial
fireworks display. This action is
intended to restrict vessel traffic
movement to protect mariners and
spectators from the hazards associated
with aerial fireworks displays.
DATES: This rule will be effective from
9 p.m. on June 30, 2012, until 10 p.m.
on July 1, 2012.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2012–
0300 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2012–0300 in the ‘‘Search’’ box,
and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They are
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email LCDR Hector Cintron,
Waterways Management Division Chief,
Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard;
telephone 757–668–5581, email
Hector.L.Cintron@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
Coast Guard did not receive the
application for this event in sufficient
time to allow for publication of an
NPRM, and any delay encountered in
this regulation’s effective date by
publishing a NPRM would require
either the cancellation of the event, or
require that the event be held without
a safety zone. For that reason it is
impracticable to publish an NPRM.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be impracticable because the
Coast Guard did not receive an
application for this event in sufficient
time to allow for publication more than
30 days prior to the date scheduled for
the event, and any additional delay in
the effective date would prevent the
safety zone from being effective at the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38497
time of the event. Therefore, immediate
action is needed to ensure the safety of
vessels transiting the area.
Background and Purpose
On June 30, 2012, the Richmond
County-Essex County Fireworks
Committee will host a fireworks event
over the navigable waters of the
Rappahannock River in Tappahannock,
VA centered on position 37°55′12″ N/
076°49′12″ W (NAD 1983). Due to the
need to protect mariners and spectators
from the hazards associated with the
fireworks display, such as the accidental
discharge of fireworks, dangerous
projectiles, and falling hot embers or
other debris, the Coast Guard believes
that vessel traffic should be temporarily
restricted within 400 feet of the
fireworks launch site.
Discussion of Rule
The Captain of the Port is establishing
a safety zone on the navigable waters of
the Rappahannock River within the area
bounded by a 400-foot radius circle
centered on position 37°55′12″ N/
076°49′12″ W (NAD 1983). This safety
zone will be enforced in the vicinity of
Tappahannock, VA from 9 p.m. until 10
p.m. on June 30, 2012, with a rain date
of July 1, 2012 from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m.
In the interest of public safety, general
navigation within the safety zone will
be restricted during the specified date
and times. Except for participants and
vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or his representative,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the regulated area.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this regulation restricts
access to the safety zone, the effect of
this rule will not be significant because:
(i) The safety zone will be in effect for
a limited duration; (ii) the zone is of
limited size; (iii) mariners may transit
the waters in and around this safety
zone at the discretion of the Captain of
the Port or designated representative;
and (iv), the Coast Guard will make
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
38498
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
notifications via maritime advisories so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor on
the Rappahannock River in the vicinity
of Tappahannock, VA from 9 p.m. until
10 p.m. on June 30, 2012.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: (i) The temporary
safety zone will only be in place for a
limited duration and limited size. (ii)
Before the enforcement period of June
30, 2012, maritime advisories will be
issued allowing mariners to adjust their
plans accordingly.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Collection of Information
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing a temporary safety
zone. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 subpart C as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–0300, to
read as follows:
■
§ 165.T05–0300 Safety Zone; RichmondEssex County Fourth of July Fireworks,
Rappahannock River, Tappahannock, VA.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: Specified waters of the
Captain of the Port Sector Hampton
Roads zone, as defined in 33 CFR 3.25–
10, within 400 feet of position: 37°-55′12″ N/076°-49′-12″ W (NAD 1983) in the
vicinity of Tappahannock, VA.
(b) Definition. For purposes of
enforcement of this section, Captain of
the Port Representative means any U.S.
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads, Virginia to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulation.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a U.S.
Coast Guard Ensign; and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a U.S.
Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) Any person or vessel seeking to
transit through the safety zone may
request prior permission of the Captain
of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia
who can be contacted at telephone
number (757) 638–6637.
(4) U.S. Coast Guard vessels enforcing
the safety zone can be contacted on
VHF–FM marine band radio, channel 13
(156.65 MHz) and channel 16 (156.8
MHz).
(d) Enforcement period. This
regulation will be enforced from 9 p.m.
until 10 p.m. on June 30, 2012, with a
rain date of July 1, 2012 from 9 p.m.
until 10 p.m.
Dated: May 15, 2012.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012–15817 Filed 6–27–12; 8:45 am]
38499
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0384]
Special Local Regulations and Safety
Zones; Recurring Events in Captain of
the Port Long Island Sound
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
various fireworks displays’ and
swimming events’ safety zones in the
Sector Long Island Sound area of
responsibility on various dates and
times listed in the tables below. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waterways
during these regattas, fireworks displays
and swim events. During the
enforcement period, no person or vessel
may enter the safety zone without
permission of the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Sector Long Island Sound or
designated representative.
SUMMARY:
The regulations in 33 CFR
165.151 will be enforced on the dates
and times listed in tables 1 and 2 in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES:
If
you have questions on this notice, call
or email Petty Officer Joseph Graun
Prevention Department U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Long Island Sound (203)
468–4544, joseph.L.Graun@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
TABLE 1 TO § 165.151
6
6.3
June
Vietnam Veterans/Town of East Haven Fireworks ..........................
•
•
•
•
Date: June 30, 2012.
Rain date: July 1, 2012.
Time: 8:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
Location: Waters off Cosey beach, East Haven, CT in approximate
position 41°14′19″ N, 072°52′9.8″ W (NAD 83).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
7
July
7.3
City of Westbrook, CT July Celebration Fireworks .........................
•
•
•
•
7.9
City of Middletown Fireworks ...........................................................
• Date: July 3, 2012.
• Rain date: July 5, 2012.
• Time: 8:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Date: July 2, 2012.
Rain date: July 3, 2012.
Time: 8:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
Location: Waters of Westbrook Harbor, Westbrook, CT in approximate position 41°16′10.50″ N, 072°26′14″ W (NAD 83).
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38497-38499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15817]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0300]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Richmond-Essex County Fourth of July Fireworks,
Rappahannock River, Tappahannock, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will establish a temporary safety zone on the
Rappahannock River in the vicinity of Tappahannock, VA to support the
Richmond-Essex County Fourth of July Fireworks event. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during
an aerial fireworks display. This action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic movement to protect mariners and spectators from the hazards
associated with aerial fireworks displays.
DATES: This rule will be effective from 9 p.m. on June 30, 2012, until
10 p.m. on July 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2012-0300 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2012-0300 in the
``Search'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email LCDR Hector Cintron, Waterways Management
Division Chief, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone 757-668-
5581, email Hector.L.Cintron@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing
the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the Coast Guard did not receive the
application for this event in sufficient time to allow for publication
of an NPRM, and any delay encountered in this regulation's effective
date by publishing a NPRM would require either the cancellation of the
event, or require that the event be held without a safety zone. For
that reason it is impracticable to publish an NPRM.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be impracticable because the Coast Guard did not receive an application
for this event in sufficient time to allow for publication more than 30
days prior to the date scheduled for the event, and any additional
delay in the effective date would prevent the safety zone from being
effective at the time of the event. Therefore, immediate action is
needed to ensure the safety of vessels transiting the area.
Background and Purpose
On June 30, 2012, the Richmond County-Essex County Fireworks
Committee will host a fireworks event over the navigable waters of the
Rappahannock River in Tappahannock, VA centered on position
37[deg]55'12'' N/076[deg]49'12'' W (NAD 1983). Due to the need to
protect mariners and spectators from the hazards associated with the
fireworks display, such as the accidental discharge of fireworks,
dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris, the
Coast Guard believes that vessel traffic should be temporarily
restricted within 400 feet of the fireworks launch site.
Discussion of Rule
The Captain of the Port is establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Rappahannock River within the area bounded by a
400-foot radius circle centered on position 37[deg]55'12'' N/
076[deg]49'12'' W (NAD 1983). This safety zone will be enforced in the
vicinity of Tappahannock, VA from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m. on June 30,
2012, with a rain date of July 1, 2012 from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m. In the
interest of public safety, general navigation within the safety zone
will be restricted during the specified date and times. Except for
participants and vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port or his representative, no person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Although this regulation restricts access
to the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant
because: (i) The safety zone will be in effect for a limited duration;
(ii) the zone is of limited size; (iii) mariners may transit the waters
in and around this safety zone at the discretion of the Captain of the
Port or designated representative; and (iv), the Coast Guard will make
[[Page 38498]]
notifications via maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor on the Rappahannock River in the vicinity of
Tappahannock, VA from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m. on June 30, 2012.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: (i) The
temporary safety zone will only be in place for a limited duration and
limited size. (ii) Before the enforcement period of June 30, 2012,
maritime advisories will be issued allowing mariners to adjust their
plans accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
[[Page 38499]]
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishing
a temporary safety zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 subpart C as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-0300, to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0300 Safety Zone; Richmond-Essex County Fourth of July
Fireworks, Rappahannock River, Tappahannock, VA.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: Specified
waters of the Captain of the Port Sector Hampton Roads zone, as defined
in 33 CFR 3.25-10, within 400 feet of position: 37[deg]-55'-12'' N/
076[deg]-49'-12'' W (NAD 1983) in the vicinity of Tappahannock, VA.
(b) Definition. For purposes of enforcement of this section,
Captain of the Port Representative means any U.S. Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulation.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or his designated representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on board a vessel displaying a
U.S. Coast Guard Ensign; and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on board a vessel displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) Any person or vessel seeking to transit through the safety zone
may request prior permission of the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads,
Virginia who can be contacted at telephone number (757) 638-6637.
(4) U.S. Coast Guard vessels enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio, channel 13 (156.65 MHz) and
channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(d) Enforcement period. This regulation will be enforced from 9
p.m. until 10 p.m. on June 30, 2012, with a rain date of July 1, 2012
from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m.
Dated: May 15, 2012.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012-15817 Filed 6-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P