Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Substances Generally Recognized as Safe; Notification Procedure, 38638-38640 [2012-15811]
Download as PDF
38638
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Notices
Resettlement Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
291).
SUMMARY: The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF), Office of
Family Assistance (OFA), Division of
State and Territory TANF Management
(DSTTM) announces the award of a
single-source cooperative agreement of
$1,500,000 to Rubicon Programs, Inc., in
Richmond, CA.
The cooperative agreement will
support a demonstration pilot project
for responsible fatherhood activities
authorized by the Claims Resolution Act
of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–291). The
Community-Centered Responsible
Fatherhood Ex-Prisoner Reentry Pilot
Project supports programs that are
designed to offer community-centered,
pre- and post-release responsible
fatherhood and supportive services to
formerly incarcerated fathers. The
primary purpose of the program is to
eliminate barriers to social and
economic self-sufficiency for
individuals preparing to reenter their
communities, or those who have
recently returned to their communities
following incarceration. The project will
implement three legislatively specified
activities: Healthy marriage, responsible
parenting, and economic stability.
The project will implement a program
that includes comprehensive case
management to strengthen father,
couple, and family relationships and
that connect formerly incarcerated
fathers to employment, housing (when
necessary), and other needed support
services to help reduce the likelihood of
recidivism. It is expected that the full
project period will be 24 months so that,
based on performance; the recipient
may receive an additional
noncompetitive award in Fiscal Year
2013.
September 30, 2012–September
29, 2013.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Robin Y. McDonald, Division Director,
Office of Family Assistance, 370
L’Enfant Promenade SW., 5th Floor
East, Washington, DC 20047. Telephone:
(202) 401–5587 Email:
robin.mcdonald@acf.hhs.gov.
Earl S. Johnson,
Director, Office of Family Assistance,
Administration for Children and Families.
[FR Doc. 2012–15783 Filed 6–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–35–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0021]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Substances
Generally Recognized as Safe;
Notification Procedure
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by July 30,
2012.
SUMMARY:
To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–7285, or emailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0342. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Domini Bean, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–
400T, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–
5733, domini.bean@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Substances Generally Recognized as
Safe: Notification Procedure—21 CFR
170.36 and 570.36 (OMB Control
Number 0910–0342)—Revision
I. Background
Section 409 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 348) establishes a premarket
approval requirement for ‘‘food
additives;’’ section 201(s) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 321) provides an
exemption from the definition of ‘‘food
additive’’ and thus from the premarket
approval requirement, for uses of
substances that are GRAS by qualified
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
experts. In the Federal Register of April
17, 1997 (62 FR 18938) (the 1997
proposed rule), FDA published a
proposed rule that would establish a
voluntary procedure whereby
manufacturers would notify FDA about
a view that a particular use (or uses) of
a substance is not subject to the
statutory premarket approval
requirements based on a determination
that such use is GRAS. The proposed
regulations (proposed 21 CFR 170.36
and 21 CFR 570.36) provide a standard
format for the voluntary submission of
a notice. The notice would include a
detailed summary of the data and
information that support the GRAS
determination, and the notifier would
maintain a record of such data and
information. FDA would make the
information describing the subject of the
GRAS notice, and the Agency’s response
to the notice, available in a publicly
accessible file; the entire GRAS notice
would be publicly available consistent
with the Freedom of Information Act
and other Federal disclosure statutes. In
the Federal Register of December 28,
2010 (75 FR 81536) (the GRAS
reopener), FDA announced the
reopening of the comment period for the
1997 proposed rule. The Agency
requested that comments be submitted
by March 28, 2011.
FDA’s Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) has recently
developed a form that prompts a notifier
to include certain elements of a GRAS
notice in a standard format. New Form
FDA 3667 is entitled ‘‘Generally
Recognized as Safe (GRAS) Notice.’’ The
form, and elements that would be
prepared as attachments to the form,
may be submitted in electronic format
via the Electronic Submissions Gateway
(ESG), or may be submitted in paper
format, or as electronic files on physical
media with paper signature page.
CFSAN expects that most if not all
businesses filing GRAS notices in the
next 3 years will choose to take
advantage of the option of electronically
submitting their GRAS notice. Thus, the
burden estimate in Table 1, line 1 is
based on the expectation of 100 percent
participation in the electronic
submission process.
FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine
(CVM) continues to comply with the
GRAS Pilot Program procedures
announced on June 4, 2010 (75 FR
31800).
II. GRAS Information on Form FDA
3667
The GRAS notice submitted to
CFSAN includes the following
information on Form FDA 3667 and in
attachments to the form:
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
38639
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Notices
A. Introductory Information About the
Submission
• Whether the GRAS notice
submission is a new GRAS notice, or an
amendment or supplement to a
previously transmitted GRAS notice;
• Whether the notifier has
determined that all files provided in an
electronic transmission are free of
computer viruses;
• The date of the notifier’s most
recent meeting with FDA before
transmitting a new GRAS notice; and
• The date of any correspondence,
sent to the notifier by FDA, relevant to
an amendment or supplement the
notifier is transmitting.
• The mode of transmission of any
electronic submission (i.e., ESG or
transmission on physical media such as
CD–ROM or DVD);
• Whether the notifier is referring us
to information already in our files;
• The statutory basis for the notifier’s
determination of GRAS status;
• Whether the notifier has designated
in its submission any information as
trade secret or as confidential
commercial or financial information;
and
• Whether the notifier has attached a
redacted copy of some or all of the
submission.
B. Information About the Notifier
• The name of and contact
information for the notifier, including
the identity of the contact person and
the company name (if applicable); and
• The name of and contact
information for any agent or attorney
who is authorized to act on behalf of the
notifier.
• The intended conditions of use of
the notified substance.
C. General Administrative Information
• The name of the substance that is
the subject of the GRAS notice
submission;
• The format of the submission (i.e.,
paper, electronic, or electronic with a
paper signature page);
D. Intended Use
E. Identity
• Information that identifies the
notified substance. For example, there
may be a chemical name and formula
and a standardized registry number.
F. Checklist of Other Elements Not
Completed Directly on Form FDA 3667
• Any additional information about
identity not previously covered;
• Method of manufacture;
• Specifications for food-grade
material;
• Dietary exposure;
• Self-limiting levels of use;
• Common use in food before 1958 (if
applicable);
• Comprehensive discussion of the
basis for the determination of GRAS
status; and
• Bibliography.
Form FDA 3667 also requires the
signature of a responsible official (or
agent or attorney) and a list of
attachments.
The information is used by FDA to
evaluate whether the notice provides a
sufficient basis for a conclusion of
GRAS status and whether information
in the notice or otherwise available to
FDA raises issues of public health
significance that lead the Agency to
question whether use of the substance is
GRAS.
III. Description of Respondents
The respondents to this collection of
information are manufacturers of
substances used in food and feed.
In the Federal Register of January 18,
2012 (77 FR 2552), FDA published a 60day notice requesting public comment
on the proposed collection of
information. No comments were
received.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average
burden per
response
21 CFR Section
FDA Form No. 2
170.36 (CFSAN) ...................................
570.36 (CVM) ........................................
FDA 3667 3 .......
N/A ...................
40
20
1
1
40
20
150
150
6,000
3,000
Total ...............................................
...........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
9,000
Total hours
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
2 Only CFSAN uses Form FDA 3667. CVM continues to comply with the GRAS Pilot Program procedures announced on June 4, 2010 (75 FR
31800).
3 Form FDA 3667 may be submitted electronically via the ESG.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
21 CFR Section
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
Total hours
170.36(c)(v) (CFSAN) ..........................................................
570.36(c)(v) (CVM) ..............................................................
40
20
1
1
40
20
15
15
600
300
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
900
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
As noted, CFSAN estimates that all of
the future Form FDA 3667 submissions
will be made electronically via the ESG.
While FDA does not charge for the use
of the ESG, FDA requires respondents to
obtain a public key infrastructure
certificate in order to set up the account.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
This can be obtained in-house or
outsourced by purchasing a public key
certificate that is valid for 1 year to 3
years. The certificate typically costs
from $20–$30.
Both CFSAN and CVM receive
submissions that are intended by the
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
submitter to be GRAS notices. Not all of
the submissions received contain
sufficient information to be filed by the
Agency as GRAS notices. In the
December 28, 2010, GRAS reopener,
FDA requested comment on its GRAS
submission filing decision process and
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
38640
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 125 / Thursday, June 28, 2012 / Notices
described its current preliminary review
process of GRAS submissions (75 FR
81536 at 81543). Therefore, the Agency
is basing the following estimates on the
number of GRAS notices that have been
filed by the relevant Center.
In the 1997 proposed rule, FDA
estimated that CFSAN would file
approximately 50 GRAS notices per year
and that CVM would file approximately
10 GRAS notices per year. Approval for
the GRAS notification program was
granted by OMB on June 16, 1997,
under OMB control number 0910–0342.
In 2009, FDA’s estimate of the annual
number of GRAS notices that will be
filed by CFSAN and CVM was revised
downward from the original PRA
approval, based on the actual number of
GRAS notices filed by CFSAN from
1998 to 2008. In 2009, FDA sought and
OMB approved an estimate that CFSAN
would file 25 GRAS notices and CVM
would file 5 GRAS notices. On June 4,
2010, CVM announced the beginning of
a GRAS Pilot Program (75 FR 31800).
This notice stated that the revised
estimate in the 2009 PRA approval
reflected FDA’s best judgment at the
time as to the number of notices CVM
will file annually through this pilot
program.
For purposes of this extension
request, CFSAN and CVM are reevaluating their estimates of the annual
number of GRAS notices that will be
received by CFSAN and CVM in the
next 3 years, 2012 through 2015. CFSAN
filed 365 GRAS notices during the 13year period from 1998 through 2010, for
an average of approximately 28 GRAS
notices per year. However, recent years
have seen an increase in the number of
GRAS notices filed, with 36 notices
filed in both 2008 and 2009 and 55
notices in 2010. Based on an
approximate average from the last 3
years, FDA is revising its estimate of the
annual number of GRAS notices filed by
CFSAN to be 40 or less. CFSAN expects
that most if not all businesses filing
GRAS notices in the next 3 years will
choose to take advantage of the option
of electronically submitting their GRAS
notice. We expect participation to be
100 percent; thus the estimate in Table
1 is based on the burden of that
experience. FDA also is revising its
estimate of the annual number of GRAS
notices submitted to CVM. As noted, on
June 4, 2010, CVM announced the
beginning of a GRAS Pilot Program.
From June 2010 to October 2011, CVM
filed 13 GRAS notices. Based on this
experience, FDA is revising its estimate
of the annual number of GRAS notices
filed by CVM to be 20 or less.
In the 1997 proposed rule, FDA
estimated that the notification
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Jun 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
procedures would require 150 hours per
response for the reporting burdens and
15 hours per response for the
recordkeeping burdens for both
proposed sections (§§ 170.36 and
570.36). FDA is retaining these
estimates for this request. The
availability of the form, and the
opportunity to provide the information
in electronic format, could reduce this
estimate. However, as a conservative
approach for the purpose of this
analysis, FDA is assuming that the
availability of the form and the
opportunity to submit the information
in electronic format will have no effect
on the average time to prepare a GRAS
notification.
Dated: June 22, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–15811 Filed 6–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Cooperative Agreements for the Office
of Direct Service and Contracting
Tribes Under the National Indian
Health Outreach and Education
Program
Announcement Type: New.
Funding Announcement Number:
HHS–2012–IHS–NIHOE–0002.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 93.933.
Key Dates
Application Deadline Date: August 2,
2012.
Review Date: August 15, 2012.
Earliest Anticipated Start Date:
September 16, 2012.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Statutory Authority
The Indian Health Service (IHS) is
accepting applications for two limited
competition cooperative agreements for
the Office of Direct Service and
Contracting Tribes under the National
Indian Health Outreach and Education
(NIHOE) program: the Behavioral
Health—Methamphetamine and Suicide
Prevention Intervention (MSPI) outreach
and education award and the Human
Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired
Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/
AIDS) outreach and education award.
The Behavioral Health—MSPI outreach
and education award is funded by IHS
and is authorized under the Snyder Act,
codified at 25 U.S.C. 13; the Transfer
Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. 2001; the
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department of the Interior,
Environment, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2010, Public Law
111–88; and the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2012, Public Law
112–74. The HIV/AIDS outreach and
education award is funded by the Office
of the Secretary (OS), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
Funding for the HIV/AIDS award will be
provided by OS via an IntraDepartmental Delegation of Authority
dated March 30, 2012 to IHS to permit
obligation of funding appropriated by
the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2012, Public Law 112–74. Each award is
funded through a separate funding
stream by each respective agency’s
appropriations. The awardee is
responsible for accounting for each of
the two awards separately and must
provide two separate financial reports
(one for each award), as indicated
below. This program is described in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under 93.933.
Limited Competition Announcement
This is a Limited Competition
announcement. The funding levels
noted include both direct and indirect
costs (IDC). See Section VI. Award
Administration Information, 3. Indirect
Costs. Applicant must address both
projects. Applicants must provide a
separate budget for each application.
Limited competition refers to a
competitive funding opportunity that
limits the eligibility to compete to more
than one entity but less than all entities.
Limited Competition Justification
Competition for both of the awards
included in this announcement is
limited to national Indian health care
organizations with at least ten years of
experience providing education and
outreach on a national scale. This
limitation ensures that the awardee will
have: (1) A national information-sharing
infrastructure which will facilitate the
timely exchange of information between
HHS and Tribes and Tribal
organizations on a broad scale; (2) a
national perspective on the needs of
American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN)
communities that will ensure that the
information developed and
disseminated through the projects is
appropriate, useful and addresses the
most pressing needs of AI/AN
communities; and (3) established
relationships with Tribes and Tribal
organizations that will foster open and
honest participation by AI/AN
communities. Regional or local
organizations will not have the
mechanisms in place to conduct
communication on a national level, nor
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38638-38640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15811]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0021]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Substances Generally
Recognized as Safe; Notification Procedure
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by July
30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-7285, or emailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0342.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400T,
Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-5733, domini.bean@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Substances Generally Recognized as Safe: Notification Procedure--21 CFR
170.36 and 570.36 (OMB Control Number 0910-0342)--Revision
I. Background
Section 409 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C
Act) (21 U.S.C. 348) establishes a premarket approval requirement for
``food additives;'' section 201(s) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 321)
provides an exemption from the definition of ``food additive'' and thus
from the premarket approval requirement, for uses of substances that
are GRAS by qualified experts. In the Federal Register of April 17,
1997 (62 FR 18938) (the 1997 proposed rule), FDA published a proposed
rule that would establish a voluntary procedure whereby manufacturers
would notify FDA about a view that a particular use (or uses) of a
substance is not subject to the statutory premarket approval
requirements based on a determination that such use is GRAS. The
proposed regulations (proposed 21 CFR 170.36 and 21 CFR 570.36) provide
a standard format for the voluntary submission of a notice. The notice
would include a detailed summary of the data and information that
support the GRAS determination, and the notifier would maintain a
record of such data and information. FDA would make the information
describing the subject of the GRAS notice, and the Agency's response to
the notice, available in a publicly accessible file; the entire GRAS
notice would be publicly available consistent with the Freedom of
Information Act and other Federal disclosure statutes. In the Federal
Register of December 28, 2010 (75 FR 81536) (the GRAS reopener), FDA
announced the reopening of the comment period for the 1997 proposed
rule. The Agency requested that comments be submitted by March 28,
2011.
FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) has
recently developed a form that prompts a notifier to include certain
elements of a GRAS notice in a standard format. New Form FDA 3667 is
entitled ``Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) Notice.'' The form, and
elements that would be prepared as attachments to the form, may be
submitted in electronic format via the Electronic Submissions Gateway
(ESG), or may be submitted in paper format, or as electronic files on
physical media with paper signature page. CFSAN expects that most if
not all businesses filing GRAS notices in the next 3 years will choose
to take advantage of the option of electronically submitting their GRAS
notice. Thus, the burden estimate in Table 1, line 1 is based on the
expectation of 100 percent participation in the electronic submission
process.
FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) continues to comply with
the GRAS Pilot Program procedures announced on June 4, 2010 (75 FR
31800).
II. GRAS Information on Form FDA 3667
The GRAS notice submitted to CFSAN includes the following
information on Form FDA 3667 and in attachments to the form:
[[Page 38639]]
A. Introductory Information About the Submission
Whether the GRAS notice submission is a new GRAS notice,
or an amendment or supplement to a previously transmitted GRAS notice;
Whether the notifier has determined that all files
provided in an electronic transmission are free of computer viruses;
The date of the notifier's most recent meeting with FDA
before transmitting a new GRAS notice; and
The date of any correspondence, sent to the notifier by
FDA, relevant to an amendment or supplement the notifier is
transmitting.
B. Information About the Notifier
The name of and contact information for the notifier,
including the identity of the contact person and the company name (if
applicable); and
The name of and contact information for any agent or
attorney who is authorized to act on behalf of the notifier.
C. General Administrative Information
The name of the substance that is the subject of the GRAS
notice submission;
The format of the submission (i.e., paper, electronic, or
electronic with a paper signature page);
The mode of transmission of any electronic submission
(i.e., ESG or transmission on physical media such as CD-ROM or DVD);
Whether the notifier is referring us to information
already in our files;
The statutory basis for the notifier's determination of
GRAS status;
Whether the notifier has designated in its submission any
information as trade secret or as confidential commercial or financial
information; and
Whether the notifier has attached a redacted copy of some
or all of the submission.
D. Intended Use
The intended conditions of use of the notified substance.
E. Identity
Information that identifies the notified substance. For
example, there may be a chemical name and formula and a standardized
registry number.
F. Checklist of Other Elements Not Completed Directly on Form FDA 3667
Any additional information about identity not previously
covered;
Method of manufacture;
Specifications for food-grade material;
Dietary exposure;
Self-limiting levels of use;
Common use in food before 1958 (if applicable);
Comprehensive discussion of the basis for the
determination of GRAS status; and
Bibliography.
Form FDA 3667 also requires the signature of a responsible official
(or agent or attorney) and a list of attachments.
The information is used by FDA to evaluate whether the notice
provides a sufficient basis for a conclusion of GRAS status and whether
information in the notice or otherwise available to FDA raises issues
of public health significance that lead the Agency to question whether
use of the substance is GRAS.
III. Description of Respondents
The respondents to this collection of information are manufacturers
of substances used in food and feed.
In the Federal Register of January 18, 2012 (77 FR 2552), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. No comments were received.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
21 CFR Section FDA Form No. \2\ Number of responses per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent responses per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
170.36 (CFSAN)......................... FDA 3667 \3\................... 40 1 40 150 6,000
570.36 (CVM)........................... N/A............................ 20 1 20 150 3,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.............................. ............................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 9,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
\2\ Only CFSAN uses Form FDA 3667. CVM continues to comply with the GRAS Pilot Program procedures announced on June 4, 2010 (75 FR 31800).
\3\ Form FDA 3667 may be submitted electronically via the ESG.
Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
21 CFR Section Number of records per Total annual per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeper records recordkeeping
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
170.36(c)(v) (CFSAN)............ 40 1 40 15 600
570.36(c)(v) (CVM).............. 20 1 20 15 300
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 900
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
As noted, CFSAN estimates that all of the future Form FDA 3667
submissions will be made electronically via the ESG. While FDA does not
charge for the use of the ESG, FDA requires respondents to obtain a
public key infrastructure certificate in order to set up the account.
This can be obtained in-house or outsourced by purchasing a public key
certificate that is valid for 1 year to 3 years. The certificate
typically costs from $20-$30.
Both CFSAN and CVM receive submissions that are intended by the
submitter to be GRAS notices. Not all of the submissions received
contain sufficient information to be filed by the Agency as GRAS
notices. In the December 28, 2010, GRAS reopener, FDA requested comment
on its GRAS submission filing decision process and
[[Page 38640]]
described its current preliminary review process of GRAS submissions
(75 FR 81536 at 81543). Therefore, the Agency is basing the following
estimates on the number of GRAS notices that have been filed by the
relevant Center.
In the 1997 proposed rule, FDA estimated that CFSAN would file
approximately 50 GRAS notices per year and that CVM would file
approximately 10 GRAS notices per year. Approval for the GRAS
notification program was granted by OMB on June 16, 1997, under OMB
control number 0910-0342. In 2009, FDA's estimate of the annual number
of GRAS notices that will be filed by CFSAN and CVM was revised
downward from the original PRA approval, based on the actual number of
GRAS notices filed by CFSAN from 1998 to 2008. In 2009, FDA sought and
OMB approved an estimate that CFSAN would file 25 GRAS notices and CVM
would file 5 GRAS notices. On June 4, 2010, CVM announced the beginning
of a GRAS Pilot Program (75 FR 31800). This notice stated that the
revised estimate in the 2009 PRA approval reflected FDA's best judgment
at the time as to the number of notices CVM will file annually through
this pilot program.
For purposes of this extension request, CFSAN and CVM are re-
evaluating their estimates of the annual number of GRAS notices that
will be received by CFSAN and CVM in the next 3 years, 2012 through
2015. CFSAN filed 365 GRAS notices during the 13-year period from 1998
through 2010, for an average of approximately 28 GRAS notices per year.
However, recent years have seen an increase in the number of GRAS
notices filed, with 36 notices filed in both 2008 and 2009 and 55
notices in 2010. Based on an approximate average from the last 3 years,
FDA is revising its estimate of the annual number of GRAS notices filed
by CFSAN to be 40 or less. CFSAN expects that most if not all
businesses filing GRAS notices in the next 3 years will choose to take
advantage of the option of electronically submitting their GRAS notice.
We expect participation to be 100 percent; thus the estimate in Table 1
is based on the burden of that experience. FDA also is revising its
estimate of the annual number of GRAS notices submitted to CVM. As
noted, on June 4, 2010, CVM announced the beginning of a GRAS Pilot
Program. From June 2010 to October 2011, CVM filed 13 GRAS notices.
Based on this experience, FDA is revising its estimate of the annual
number of GRAS notices filed by CVM to be 20 or less.
In the 1997 proposed rule, FDA estimated that the notification
procedures would require 150 hours per response for the reporting
burdens and 15 hours per response for the recordkeeping burdens for
both proposed sections (Sec. Sec. 170.36 and 570.36). FDA is retaining
these estimates for this request. The availability of the form, and the
opportunity to provide the information in electronic format, could
reduce this estimate. However, as a conservative approach for the
purpose of this analysis, FDA is assuming that the availability of the
form and the opportunity to submit the information in electronic format
will have no effect on the average time to prepare a GRAS notification.
Dated: June 22, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-15811 Filed 6-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P