TRICARE; Constructive Eligibility for TRICARE Benefits of Certain Persons Otherwise Ineligible Under Retroactive Determination of Entitlement to Medicare Part A Hospital Insurance Benefits, 38175-38177 [2012-15508]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
PART 199—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 199
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter
55.
2. Section 199.4 is amended by
revising paragraph (e)(19)(v) to read as
follows:
■
§ 199.4
Basic program benefits.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(19) * * *
(v) Periods of care. Hospice care is
divided into distinct periods of care.
The periods of care that may be elected
by the terminally ill CHAMPUS
beneficiary shall be as the Director,
TRICARE determines to be appropriate,
but shall not be less than those offered
under Medicare’s Hospice Program.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 199.14 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1)(ii)(C)(3),
(a)(1)(iii)(A)(2), and (j)(1)(ix) to read as
follows:
§ 199.14 Provider reimbursement
methods.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) * * *
(3) All services related to heart and
liver transplantation for admissions
prior to October 1, 1998, which would
otherwise be paid under the respective
DRG.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Remove DRGs. Those DRGs that
represent discharges with invalid data
or diagnoses insufficient for DRG
assignment purposes are removed from
the database.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(1) * * *
(ix) The allowable charge for
physician assistant services other than
assistant-at-surgery shall be at the same
percentage, used by Medicare, of the
allowable charge for a comparable
service rendered by a physician
performing the service in a similar
location. For cases in which the
physician assistant and the physician
perform component services of a
procedure other than assistant-atsurgery (e.g., home, office, or hospital
visit), the combined allowable charge
for the procedure may not exceed the
allowable charge for the procedure
rendered by a physician alone. The
allowable charge for physician assistant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Jun 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
services performed as an assistant-atsurgery shall be at the same percentage,
used by Medicare, of the allowable
charge for a physician serving as an
assistant surgeon when authorized as
CHAMPUS benefits in accordance with
the provisions of § 199.4(c)(3)(iii).
Physician assistant services must be
billed through the employing physician
who must be an authorized CHAMPUS
provider.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 20, 2012.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012–15509 Filed 6–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DOD–2011–HA–0058]
RIN 0720–AB51
TRICARE; Constructive Eligibility for
TRICARE Benefits of Certain Persons
Otherwise Ineligible Under Retroactive
Determination of Entitlement to
Medicare Part A Hospital Insurance
Benefits
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department is publishing
this final rule to implement section 706
of the National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2010, Public
Law 111–84. Specifically, section 706
exempts TRICARE beneficiaries under
the age of 65 who become disabled from
the requirement to enroll in Medicare
Part B for the retroactive months of
entitlement to Medicare Part A in order
to maintain TRICARE coverage. This
statutory amendment and final rule only
impact eligibility for the period in
which the beneficiary’s disability
determination is pending before the
Social Security Administration. Eligible
beneficiaries are still required to enroll
in Medicare Part B in order to maintain
their TRICARE coverage for future
months, but are considered to have
coverage under the TRICARE program
for the retroactive months of their
entitlement to Medicare Part A. This
final rule also amends the eligibility
section of the TRICARE regulation to
more clearly address reinstatement of
TRICARE eligibility following a gap in
coverage due to lack of enrollment in
Medicare Part B.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38175
Effective Date: This final rule is
effective July 27, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Anne Breslin, TRICARE Operations
Branch, TRICARE Management Activity
(TMA), 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810,
Falls Church, VA 22041, telephone
(703) 681–0039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Background
Prior to the enactment of section 706
of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
84), 10 U.S.C. 1086(d) provided that a
person who would otherwise receive
benefits under section 1086 who is
entitled to Medicare Part A hospital
insurance is not eligible for TRICARE
unless the individual is enrolled in
Medicare Part B. When a TRICARE
beneficiary becomes eligible for
Medicare, Medicare becomes the
primary payer and TRICARE is the
secondary payer. Retroactive Medicare
eligibility determinations therefore
caused DoD and Medicare to reprocess
claims. Section 706 of the Fiscal Year
2010 National Defense Authorization
Act amended 10 U.S.C. 1086(d) to
exempt TRICARE beneficiaries under
the age of 65 who became Medicare
eligible due to a retroactive disability
determination from the requirement to
enroll in Medicare Part B for the
retroactive months of entitlement to
Medicare Part A in order to maintain
TRICARE coverage. This statutory
amendment became effective upon
enactment of the Fiscal Year 2010
National Defense Authorization Act on
October 28, 2009. Prior to this
amendment, beneficiaries who did not
purchase Medicare Part B to cover the
retroactive period lost their TRICARE
eligibility during that period of time. As
a result, beneficiaries and providers
were then subject to TRICARE
recoupment action for care provided
during the period of retroactive
disability. Pursuant to this amendment,
TRICARE remains first payer for any
claims filed during the retroactive
months and disabled TRICARE
beneficiaries are relieved of the
financial burden of making retroactive
payments to avoid a gap in coverage.
This final rule amends the Code of
Federal Regulations to conform to
current statutory authority regarding
TRICARE eligibility.
Additionally, due to an earlier
administrative omission, this final rule
also amends 32 CFR 199.3 to more
clearly address reinstatement of
TRICARE eligibility following a gap in
coverage due to lack of enrollment in
Part B. While most TRICARE
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
38176
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
beneficiaries who become eligible for
Medicare Part A maintain TRICARE
coverage through prompt acceptance of
Part B coverage, there are a number of
beneficiaries that for one reason or
another decline Part B and lose their
TRICARE eligibility. For those
individuals, they can have that
eligibility reinstated at a later date if
they re-enroll in Part B. This final rule
amends the section on reinstatement of
TRICARE eligibility to include
beneficiaries who elect to enroll in
Medicare Part B following a gap in
TRICARE coverage.
II. Public Comments
We provided a 60-day public
comment period following publication
of the Proposed Rule in the Federal
Register (76 FR 58204–58206) on
September 20, 2011. We received no
public comments.
III. Regulatory Procedures
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3511)
This rule will not impose additional
information collection requirements on
the public. OMB previously cleared the
collection requirements under OMB
Control Number 0704–0364.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
We have examined the impact(s) of
the rule under Executive Order 13132,
and it does not have policies that have
federalism implications that would have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
13:12 Jun 26, 2012
Sec. 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act’’
This rule does not contain unfunded
mandates. It does not contain a Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care,
Health insurance, Individuals with
disabilities, Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is
amended as follows:
PART 199—[AMENDED]
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’; Executive Order
13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review’’; and Public Law 96–
354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ (5
U.S.C. 601)
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
require that a comprehensive regulatory
impact analysis be performed on any
economically significant regulatory
action, defined as one that would result
in an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the national economy or which
would have other substantial impacts.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires that each Federal agency
prepare, and make available for public
comment, a regulatory flexibility
analysis when the agency issues a
regulation which would have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule is
not an economically significant
regulatory action and will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities for purposes of
the RFA, thus this final rule is not
subject to any of these requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, therefore,
consultation with State and local
officials is not required.
Jkt 226001
1. The authority citation for part 199
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter
55.
2. Section 199.3 is amended by:
a. Adding paragraph (f)(2)(iii);
b. Revising paragraph (f)(3)(ix)(C); and
c. Adding paragraph (g)(3) to read as
follows:
■
■
■
■
§ 199.3
Eligibility.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Attainment of entitlement to
hospital insurance benefits (Part A)
under Medicare except as provided in
paragraphs (b)(3), (f)(3)(vii), (f)(3)(viii)
and (f)(3)(ix) of this section.
(3) * * *
(ix) * * *
(C) The individual is enrolled in Part
B of Medicare except that in the case of
a retroactive determination of
entitlement to Medicare Part A hospital
insurance benefits for a person under 65
years of age there is no requirement to
enroll in Medicare Part B from the
Medicare Part A entitlement date until
the issuance of such retroactive
determination; and
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(3) Enrollment in Medicare Part B. For
individuals whose CHAMPUS eligibility
has terminated pursuant to paragraph
(f)(2)(iii) or (f)(3)(vi) of this section due
to beneficiary action to decline Part B of
Medicare, CHAMPUS eligibility
resumes, effective on the date Medicare
Part B coverage begins, if the person
subsequently enrolls in Medicare Part B
and the person is otherwise still eligible.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3. Section 199.8 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(i);
b. Redesignating paragraphs (d)(1)(vi),
(d)(1)(vii) and (d)(1)(viii) as (d)(1)(vii),
(d)(1)(viii), and (d)(1)(ix) respectively;
and
■ c. Adding new paragraph (d)(1)(vi) to
read as follows.
■
■
■
§ 199.8
Double coverage.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) General rule. In any case in which
a beneficiary is eligible for both
Medicare and CHAMPUS received
medical or dental care for which
payment may be made under Medicare
and CHAMPUS, Medicare is always the
primary payer except in the case of
retroactive determinations of disability
as provided in paragraph (d)(1)(v) of this
section. For dependents of active duty
members, payment will be determined
in accordance to paragraph (c) of this
section. For all other beneficiaries
eligible for Medicare, the amount
payable under CHAMPUS shall be the
amount of actual out-of-pocket costs
incurred by the beneficiary for that care
over the sum of the amount paid for that
care under Medicare and the total of all
amounts paid or payable by third party
payers other than Medicare.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) Retroactive determinations of
disability. In circumstances involving
determinations of retroactive Medicare
Part A entitlement for persons under 65
years of age, Medicare becomes the
primary payer effective as of the date of
issuance of the retroactive
determination by the Social Security
Administration. For care and services
rendered prior to issuance of the
retroactive determination, the
CHAMPUS payment will be determined
consistent with paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(B)
of this section notwithstanding the
beneficiary’s retroactive entitlement for
Medicare Part A during that period.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 199.11 is amended by
revising paragraph (f)(3) to read as
follows:
§ 199.11
Overpayments recovery.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(3) Claims arising from erroneous
TRICARE payments in situations where
the beneficiary has entitlement to an
insurance, medical service, health and
medical plan, including any plan
offered by a third party payer as defined
in 10 U.S.C. 1095(h)(1) or other
government program, except in the case
of a plan administered under Title XIX
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396, et seq.) through employment, by
law, through membership in an
organization, or as a student, or through
the purchase of a private insurance or
health plan, shall be recouped following
the procedures in paragraph (f) of this
section. If the other plan has not made
payment to the beneficiary or provider,
the contractor shall first attempt to
recover the overpayment from the other
plan through the contractor’s
coordination of benefits procedures. If
the overpayment cannot be recovered
from the other plan, or if the other plan
has made payment, the overpayment
will be recovered from the party that
received the erroneous payment from
TRICARE. Nothing in this section shall
be construed to require recoupment
from any sponsor, beneficiary, provider,
supplier and/or the Medicare Program
under Title XVIII of the Social Security
Act in the event of a retroactive
determination of entitlement to SSDI
and Medicare Part A coverage made by
the Social Security Administration as
discussed in § 199.8(d) of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 20, 2012.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012–15508 Filed 6–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DOD–2008–HA–0090]
RIN 0720–AB23
TRICARE; Off-Label Uses of Devices;
Partial List of Examples of Unproven
Drugs, Devices, Medical Treatments, or
Procedures
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense is
publishing this final rule to revise the
definition of ‘‘unlabeled or off-label
drug’’ to ‘‘off-label use of a drug or
device.’’ This provision codifies the
coverage of those medically necessary
indications for which there are
demonstrations from medical literature,
national organizations, or technology
assessment bodies that the off-label use
is safe and effective and in accordance
with nationally accepted standards of
practice in the medical community.
Additionally, this rule removes the
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:12 Jun 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
partial list of examples of unproven
drugs, devices, and medical treatments
or procedures proscribed in TRICARE
regulations. We are removing the partial
list from the regulation but will
maintain the partial list in the TRICARE
Policy Manual at www.tricare.mil.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective July 27, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Elan Green, TRICARE Management
Activity, Medical Benefits and
Reimbursement Branch, telephone (303)
676–3907.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of August 31,
2009 (74 FR 44797–44798), the Office of
the Secretary of Defense published for
public comment a proposed rule that
revised the definition of ‘‘unlabeled or
off-label drug’’ to ‘‘off-label use of a drug
or device.’’ In addition this proposed
rule removed the partial list of examples
of unproven drugs, devices, and medical
treatments or procedures proscribed
under Section 199.4(g)(15).
Off-Label Uses of Devices
On January 6, 1997, the Office of the
Secretary of Defense published a final
rule in the Federal Register (62 FR 627–
631) clarifying the TRICARE exclusion
of unproven drugs, devices, and medical
treatments or procedures and adding the
TRICARE definition of unlabeled or offlabel drugs. This rule also added the
provision for coverage of unlabeled or
off-label uses of drugs that are Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) approved
drugs that are prescribed or
administered by a health care
practitioner and are used for indications
or treatments not included in the
approved labeling. We are now
modifying the definition of ‘‘unlabeled
or off-label drug’’ to ‘‘off-label use of a
drug or device,’’ which includes a drug,
biologic or device under the regulatory
authority of the FDA. However, this
proposed rule does not present new
agency policy. Rather, it corrects an
error and omission from the current
rule. Coverage is limited to those
indications for which there are
demonstrations from medical literature,
national organizations, or technology
assessment bodies that the off-label use
is safe and effective and in accordance
with nationally accepted standards of
practice in the medical community. In
addition, the off-label use must be
reviewed for medical necessity.
In general, good medical practice and
the best interests of the patient require
that physicians use legally available
drugs, biologics, and devices, including
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38177
combination products, according to
their best knowledge and judgment.
When providers use a product for an
indication not in the approved labeling,
they have a responsibility to be well
informed about the product, to base its
use on firm scientific rationale and on
sound medical evidence. Limiting
CHAMPUS cost-sharing to those offlabel uses for which there are
demonstrations from medical literature,
national organizations, or technology
assessment bodies that the off-label use
is safe, effective, and in accordance with
nationally accepted standards of
practice in the medical community will
help to ensure there is sufficient
scientific evidence supporting the offlabel use, without being overly onerous,
while still promoting innovations in
medical practice that benefit patients.
In reviewing the proposed rule, we
discovered that we had inadvertently
incorporated the TRICARE reliable
evidence standard (as defined in 32 CFR
199.2) as the threshold for reviewing
coverage for off-label or unlabeled use.
The intent was not to make the standard
of review more onerous but rather to
expand the application of the existing
provision regarding the cost-sharing of
off-label use of drugs to also include the
off-label use of devices and biologics. As
a result, we are withdrawing the
changes to the third paragraph of the
Note to paragraph (g)(15)(i)(A) in section
199.4 with the exception of replacing
the term ‘‘unlabeled or off-label uses of
drugs’’ with ‘‘off-label uses of drugs and
devices,’’ with an appropriate reference
back to the definition of the term in
199.2. ‘‘Off-label uses of drugs and
devices’’ includes off-label uses of
drugs, biologics, devices, and
combination products.
Although most biological products
meet the definition of ‘‘drugs’’ under the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act,
and are also regulated under that law,
biological products are approved for
marketing under the Public Health
Services Act by means of a biologics
license application. Thus, the definition
of ‘‘off-label use of a drug or device’’ has
been revised to acknowledge both the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
and the Public Health Services Act as
sources of the FDA’s regulatory
authority over the marketing of these
products.
Partial List of Examples of Unproven
Drugs, Devices, and Medical Treatments
or Procedures
By law, TRICARE can cost-share only
medically necessary supplies and
services. Any drug, device, and medical
treatment or procedure, the safety and
efficacy of which have not been
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38175-38177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15508]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DOD-2011-HA-0058]
RIN 0720-AB51
TRICARE; Constructive Eligibility for TRICARE Benefits of Certain
Persons Otherwise Ineligible Under Retroactive Determination of
Entitlement to Medicare Part A Hospital Insurance Benefits
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department is publishing this final rule to implement
section 706 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year 2010, Public Law 111-84. Specifically, section 706 exempts TRICARE
beneficiaries under the age of 65 who become disabled from the
requirement to enroll in Medicare Part B for the retroactive months of
entitlement to Medicare Part A in order to maintain TRICARE coverage.
This statutory amendment and final rule only impact eligibility for the
period in which the beneficiary's disability determination is pending
before the Social Security Administration. Eligible beneficiaries are
still required to enroll in Medicare Part B in order to maintain their
TRICARE coverage for future months, but are considered to have coverage
under the TRICARE program for the retroactive months of their
entitlement to Medicare Part A. This final rule also amends the
eligibility section of the TRICARE regulation to more clearly address
reinstatement of TRICARE eligibility following a gap in coverage due to
lack of enrollment in Medicare Part B.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective July 27, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Anne Breslin, TRICARE Operations
Branch, TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite
810, Falls Church, VA 22041, telephone (703) 681-0039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Prior to the enactment of section 706 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111-84), 10 U.S.C.
1086(d) provided that a person who would otherwise receive benefits
under section 1086 who is entitled to Medicare Part A hospital
insurance is not eligible for TRICARE unless the individual is enrolled
in Medicare Part B. When a TRICARE beneficiary becomes eligible for
Medicare, Medicare becomes the primary payer and TRICARE is the
secondary payer. Retroactive Medicare eligibility determinations
therefore caused DoD and Medicare to reprocess claims. Section 706 of
the Fiscal Year 2010 National Defense Authorization Act amended 10
U.S.C. 1086(d) to exempt TRICARE beneficiaries under the age of 65 who
became Medicare eligible due to a retroactive disability determination
from the requirement to enroll in Medicare Part B for the retroactive
months of entitlement to Medicare Part A in order to maintain TRICARE
coverage. This statutory amendment became effective upon enactment of
the Fiscal Year 2010 National Defense Authorization Act on October 28,
2009. Prior to this amendment, beneficiaries who did not purchase
Medicare Part B to cover the retroactive period lost their TRICARE
eligibility during that period of time. As a result, beneficiaries and
providers were then subject to TRICARE recoupment action for care
provided during the period of retroactive disability. Pursuant to this
amendment, TRICARE remains first payer for any claims filed during the
retroactive months and disabled TRICARE beneficiaries are relieved of
the financial burden of making retroactive payments to avoid a gap in
coverage. This final rule amends the Code of Federal Regulations to
conform to current statutory authority regarding TRICARE eligibility.
Additionally, due to an earlier administrative omission, this final
rule also amends 32 CFR 199.3 to more clearly address reinstatement of
TRICARE eligibility following a gap in coverage due to lack of
enrollment in Part B. While most TRICARE
[[Page 38176]]
beneficiaries who become eligible for Medicare Part A maintain TRICARE
coverage through prompt acceptance of Part B coverage, there are a
number of beneficiaries that for one reason or another decline Part B
and lose their TRICARE eligibility. For those individuals, they can
have that eligibility reinstated at a later date if they re-enroll in
Part B. This final rule amends the section on reinstatement of TRICARE
eligibility to include beneficiaries who elect to enroll in Medicare
Part B following a gap in TRICARE coverage.
II. Public Comments
We provided a 60-day public comment period following publication of
the Proposed Rule in the Federal Register (76 FR 58204-58206) on
September 20, 2011. We received no public comments.
III. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''; Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''; and Public
Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 require that a comprehensive
regulatory impact analysis be performed on any economically significant
regulatory action, defined as one that would result in an annual effect
of $100 million or more on the national economy or which would have
other substantial impacts. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires that each Federal agency prepare, and make available for
public comment, a regulatory flexibility analysis when the agency
issues a regulation which would have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule is not an economically
significant regulatory action and will not have a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities for purposes of the RFA, thus
this final rule is not subject to any of these requirements.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3511)
This rule will not impose additional information collection
requirements on the public. OMB previously cleared the collection
requirements under OMB Control Number 0704-0364.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
We have examined the impact(s) of the rule under Executive Order
13132, and it does not have policies that have federalism implications
that would have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, therefore, consultation with State and local officials is
not required.
Sec. 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
This rule does not contain unfunded mandates. It does not contain a
Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care, Health insurance, Individuals
with disabilities, Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is amended as follows:
PART 199--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 199 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter 55.
0
2. Section 199.3 is amended by:
0
a. Adding paragraph (f)(2)(iii);
0
b. Revising paragraph (f)(3)(ix)(C); and
0
c. Adding paragraph (g)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 199.3 Eligibility.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Attainment of entitlement to hospital insurance benefits
(Part A) under Medicare except as provided in paragraphs (b)(3),
(f)(3)(vii), (f)(3)(viii) and (f)(3)(ix) of this section.
(3) * * *
(ix) * * *
(C) The individual is enrolled in Part B of Medicare except that in
the case of a retroactive determination of entitlement to Medicare Part
A hospital insurance benefits for a person under 65 years of age there
is no requirement to enroll in Medicare Part B from the Medicare Part A
entitlement date until the issuance of such retroactive determination;
and
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(3) Enrollment in Medicare Part B. For individuals whose CHAMPUS
eligibility has terminated pursuant to paragraph (f)(2)(iii) or
(f)(3)(vi) of this section due to beneficiary action to decline Part B
of Medicare, CHAMPUS eligibility resumes, effective on the date
Medicare Part B coverage begins, if the person subsequently enrolls in
Medicare Part B and the person is otherwise still eligible.
0
3. Section 199.8 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(i);
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (d)(1)(vi), (d)(1)(vii) and (d)(1)(viii) as
(d)(1)(vii), (d)(1)(viii), and (d)(1)(ix) respectively; and
0
c. Adding new paragraph (d)(1)(vi) to read as follows.
Sec. 199.8 Double coverage.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) General rule. In any case in which a beneficiary is eligible
for both Medicare and CHAMPUS received medical or dental care for which
payment may be made under Medicare and CHAMPUS, Medicare is always the
primary payer except in the case of retroactive determinations of
disability as provided in paragraph (d)(1)(v) of this section. For
dependents of active duty members, payment will be determined in
accordance to paragraph (c) of this section. For all other
beneficiaries eligible for Medicare, the amount payable under CHAMPUS
shall be the amount of actual out-of-pocket costs incurred by the
beneficiary for that care over the sum of the amount paid for that care
under Medicare and the total of all amounts paid or payable by third
party payers other than Medicare.
* * * * *
(vi) Retroactive determinations of disability. In circumstances
involving determinations of retroactive Medicare Part A entitlement for
persons under 65 years of age, Medicare becomes the primary payer
effective as of the date of issuance of the retroactive determination
by the Social Security Administration. For care and services rendered
prior to issuance of the retroactive determination, the CHAMPUS payment
will be determined consistent with paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(B) of this
section notwithstanding the beneficiary's retroactive entitlement for
Medicare Part A during that period.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 199.11 is amended by revising paragraph (f)(3) to read as
follows:
Sec. 199.11 Overpayments recovery.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(3) Claims arising from erroneous TRICARE payments in situations
where the beneficiary has entitlement to an insurance, medical service,
health and medical plan, including any plan offered by a third party
payer as defined in 10 U.S.C. 1095(h)(1) or other government program,
except in the case of a plan administered under Title XIX
[[Page 38177]]
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396, et seq.) through
employment, by law, through membership in an organization, or as a
student, or through the purchase of a private insurance or health plan,
shall be recouped following the procedures in paragraph (f) of this
section. If the other plan has not made payment to the beneficiary or
provider, the contractor shall first attempt to recover the overpayment
from the other plan through the contractor's coordination of benefits
procedures. If the overpayment cannot be recovered from the other plan,
or if the other plan has made payment, the overpayment will be
recovered from the party that received the erroneous payment from
TRICARE. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require
recoupment from any sponsor, beneficiary, provider, supplier and/or the
Medicare Program under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act in the
event of a retroactive determination of entitlement to SSDI and
Medicare Part A coverage made by the Social Security Administration as
discussed in Sec. 199.8(d) of this part.
* * * * *
Dated: June 20, 2012.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012-15508 Filed 6-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P