Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Helicopters, 37790-37793 [2012-15290]
Download as PDF
37790
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 122 / Monday, June 25, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to Attn:
Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to:
9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(l) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency Airworthiness Directive 2011–0115,
dated June 17, 2011; and Fokker Service
Bulletin SBF100–53–115, dated June 16,
2011; for related information.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the following service information
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use the following service
information to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–53–
115, dated June 16, 2011.
(3) For Fokker service information
identified in this AD, contact Fokker Services
B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231,
2150 AE Nieuw-Vennep, the Netherlands;
telephone +31 (0)252–627–350; fax +31
(0)252–627–211; email
technicalservices.fokkerservices@stork.com;
Internet https://www.myfokkerfleet.com
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Jun 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(5) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call 202–741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 7,
2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–14546 Filed 6–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0566; Directorate
Identifier 2011–SW–008–AD; Amendment
39–17065; AD 2012–11–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
Deutschland GmbH Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) that
supersedes an existing Emergency
Airworthiness Directive (EAD) for
certain Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH
(ECD) Model EC135 helicopters. The
existing EAD, which was previously
sent to all known U.S. owners and
operators of ECD Model EC135
helicopters and not made generally
effective by publication in the Federal
Register, currently requires inspecting
the ring frame between the rear
structure tube (tailboom) and the tail
rotor fenestron housing (fenestron
housing) for a crack before the first
flight of each day and replacing any
cracked ring frame with an airworthy
ring frame. Since we issued that EAD,
we have determined that a pre-flight
pilot check in conjunction with a
recurring 25-hour inspection is
sufficient for determining the
airworthiness of the ring frame.
Additionally, ECD has developed a
modification that is terminating action
for the requirements of that EAD. This
superseding AD revises the inspection
requirements of the EAD to allow an
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
owner/operator to perform the pre-flight
pilot check, adds a recurring inspection
of the ring frame, and allows for
installation of a ring frame
reinforcement as an optional
terminating action for the AD
requirements. The actions are intended
to detect a crack in the ring frame which
could result in loss of the fenestron
structure and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July
10, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain documents listed in this AD
as of July 10, 2012.
We must receive comments on this
AD by August 24, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket: You may
examine the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov or in
person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact American Eurocopter
Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive,
Grand Prairie, TX 75052, telephone
(972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323, fax
(972) 641–3775, or at https://www.
eurocopter.com/techpub. You may
review a copy of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort
Worth, Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Miles, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations
and Policy Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137; phone (817)
222–5110; email: sharon.y.miles@faa.
gov.
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 122 / Monday, June 25, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not provide you with notice and
an opportunity to provide your
comments prior to it becoming effective.
However, we invite you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that resulted from
adopting this AD. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the AD, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time. We will file
in the docket all comments that we
receive, as well as a report summarizing
each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerning this
rulemaking during the comment period.
We will consider all the comments we
receive and may conduct additional
rulemaking based on those comments.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA EAD No.:
2008–0190–E, dated October 13, 2008
(EAD 2008–0190–E), to correct an
unsafe condition for EC135 and EC635
model helicopters. EASA advises that,
during a recent pre-flight check on an
EC 135 helicopter, a crack was detected
on the ring frame that connects the tail
rotor fenestron housing to the rear
structure tube (tailboom). EASA states
that this condition, if not corrected,
could lead to crack propagation
remaining undetected, possibly
resulting in loss of the fenestron
structure and loss of control of the
helicopter. EAD 2008–0190–E requires
accomplishing a pilot pre-flight check of
the rear structure tube for cracks before
each first flight of the day; amending the
flight manual to reflect the pilot preflight check; within 25 flight hours,
having the rear structure tube inspected
for cracks by a mechanic; and, if any
cracks are detected contacting ECD for
approved corrective actions.
On October 16, 2008, we issued EAD
No. 2008–22–51 (EAD 2008–22–51) for
the ECD Model EC135 helicopter. That
EAD requires, before further flight and
thereafter before the first flight of each
day, visually inspecting the ring frame
between the tailboom and fenestron
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Jun 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
37791
housing for a crack, and replacing the
ring frame with an airworthy ring frame
if there is a crack. That EAD resulted
from two reports of cracks on the ring
frame connecting the tail rotor fenestron
housing to the tailboom. The first crack
was discovered in Germany and is
discussed in EAD 2008–0190–E. The
second crack, which was 9 inches long,
was discovered in the U.S. and was in
the same area as the first reported crack.
We issued EAD 2008–22–51 to detect a
crack in the ring frame, which could
result in loss of the fenestron structure
and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
FAA’s Determination
Actions Since Existing EAD Was Issued
We reviewed ECD Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin (ASB) EC135–53A–022,
Revision 02, dated November 30, 2010
(ASB EC135–53A–022). ASB EC135–
53A–022 describes procedures for a
pilot check of the ring frame during the
preflight check. ASB EC135–53A–022
additionally prescribes a recurring
inspection of the ring frame every 25
flight hours and accomplishment of ECD
Service Bulletin EC135–53–023, as
corrected November 13, 2009 (SB
EC135–53–023), which describes
procedures to attach a frame
reinforcement to the ring frame. The
correction coversheet attached to SB
EC135–53–023 is dated November 13,
2009; it describes the correction on page
6 of the service bulletin. All pages of the
corrected service bulletin show the
original issue date of August 19, 2009;
the date has been underlined on page 6
of the corrected service bulletin.
Accomplishment of SB EC135–53–023
constitutes terminating action for the
visual inspection requirements of ASB
EC135–53A–022.
Since we issued EAD 2008–22–51,
EASA issued AD No.: 2009–0065, dated
March 13, 2009 (AD 2009–0065), which
supersedes EAD 2008–0190–E. AD
2009–0065 retains the requirements of
EAD 2008–0190–E, expands the
applicability to EC 135 helicopters
manufactured in Spain, and adds a
repetitive 100-hour inspection of the
rear fuselage structure area for cracks.
EASA next issued AD No.: 2009–
0065R1, dated September 8, 2009 (AD
2009–0065R1), which revises AD 2009–
0065. EASA advises that ECD has
developed a modification
(reinforcement) of the aft ring frame,
including a part number (P/N) change,
for both production and in-service
application. Consequently, AD 2009–
0065R1 retains the inspection
requirements of AD 2009–0065 but
limits its applicability to helicopters
without the reinforced aft ring frame
installed, and allows installation of the
reinforced aft ring frame as an optional
terminating action for the repetitive
checks and inspections.
EASA then issued AD No.: 2010–
0254, dated December 20, 2010 (AD
2010–0254), which supersedes AD
2009–0065R1. AD 2010–0254 retains the
repetitive inspection requirements of
AD 2009–0065R1, but reduces the
interval of the visual inspection from
100 hours to 25 hours and requires
installation of the reinforced aft ring
frame within 12 months as terminating
action for the repetitive checks and
inspections.
Since we issued EAD 2008–22–51, we
have determined that a pre-flight pilot
check in conjunction with a recurring
25-hour inspection is sufficient for
determining the airworthiness of the
ring frame. Therefore, we are issuing
this AD to revise the inspection
requirements, as well as allow for the
optional terminating action developed
by ECD.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of Germany
and are approved for operation in the
United States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with Germany, EASA, their
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
EASA AD. We are issuing this AD
because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the
unsafe condition is likely to exist or
develop on other helicopters of these
same type designs.
Related Service Information
AD Requirements
This AD supersedes EAD 2008–22–51
and requires the following:
• Before further flight, and thereafter
at each preflight check, performing a
visual check of the ring frame which
connects the tail rotor Fenestron
housing to the tailboom for a crack. An
owner/operator (pilot) may perform this
check because it involves only a visual
check for a crack in the ring frame and
can be performed equally well by a pilot
or a mechanic.
• Within 25 hours time-in-service
(TIS), and every 25 hours TIS thereafter,
removing the tail rotor drive shaft
paneling and inspecting the ring frame
for a crack.
• As an optional terminating action
for the requirements of this AD,
installing a frame reinforcement to the
ring frame and re-identifying the ring
frame by following specified portions of
the manufacturer’s service bulletin.
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
37792
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 122 / Monday, June 25, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Differences Between This AD and the
EASA AD
This AD differs from the EASA AD as
follows:
• The EASA AD requires amendment
of the Flight Manual with a page from
ASB EC135–53A–022. Following
issuance of the EASA AD, a revision has
been published for the Flight Manuals
and the amended pages are no longer
issued with ASB EC135–53A–022.
Therefore, this AD does not require this.
• The EASA AD requires
modification of the aft ring frame within
12 months as terminating action; this
AD provides it as an optional
terminating action.
• The EASA AD applies to the Model
EC 635 helicopter, and this AD does not
include this model because it does not
have an FAA-issued type certificate.
• The EASA AD includes a
‘‘tolerance’’ range for accomplishment
of the pilot check and visual
inspections. This AD does not allow
this.
Interim Action
We consider this AD interim action.
We are currently considering requiring
the installation of the ECD-developed
ring frame modification as terminating
action for the repetitive inspection
requirements of this AD. However, the
planned compliance time for the
installation of the modification would
allow enough time to provide notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
on the merits of the modification.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
226 helicopters of U.S. Registry. We
estimate that operators may incur the
following costs in order to comply with
this AD. Inspecting the ring frame
requires .5 work-hour at an average
labor rate of $85 per hour, for a cost per
inspection cycle of $42.50 per
helicopter, and a cost to the fleet of
$9,605. Replacing a cracked ring frame
will require about 8 work hours at an
average labor rate of $85 per hour, and
a parts cost of $7,425, for a total cost per
helicopter of $8,105. Modifying and reidentifying the ring frame requires 17
work-hours and a parts cost of $1,320,
for a total cost per helicopter of $2,765
and the cost to the fleet is $624,890.
According to the manufacturer, they
will cover all parts costs for a cracked
ring frame, thereby reducing the cost
impact on affected persons. However, as
we do not control such coverage by the
manufacturer, we have included all
costs in our cost estimate.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Jun 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
FAA’s Justification and Determination
of the Effective Date
Providing an opportunity for public
comments prior to adopting these AD
requirements would delay
implementing the safety actions needed
to correct this known unsafe condition.
Therefore, we find that the risk to the
flying public justifies waiving notice
and comment prior to the adoption of
this rule because some of the required
checks and inspections must be
accomplished before further flight.
Since an unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD, we determined that notice and
opportunity for public comment before
issuing this AD are impracticable and
that good cause exists for making this
amendment effective in less than 30
days.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2012–11–02 Eurocopter Deutschland
GmbH: Amendment 39–17065; Docket
No. FAA–2012–0566; Directorate
Identifier 2011–SW–008–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Model EC135
helicopters with a ring frame, part number
(P/N) L535A3501230, installed, certificated
in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a
crack in the ring frame connecting the rear
structure tube (tailboom) and the tail rotor
fenestron housing. This condition could
result in loss of the fenestron structure and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Other Affected ADs
This AD supersedes Emergency AD 2008–
22–51, dated October 16, 2008.
(d) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective July 10, 2012.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) Before further flight, and thereafter at
before the first flight of the day, visually
check the ring frame that connects the tail
rotor fenestron housing to the tailboom for a
crack. This action may be performed by the
owner/operator (pilot) holding at least a
private pilot certificate, and must be entered
into the aircraft records showing compliance
with this AD in accordance with 14 CFR 43.9
(a)(1)–(4) and 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v). The
record must be maintained as required by 14
CFR 91.173, 121.380, or 135.439.
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 122 / Monday, June 25, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS),
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 25
hours TIS, remove the tail rotor driveshaft
paneling and visually inspect the ring frame
for a crack.
(3) While performing a check or an
inspection as required in paragraph (f)(1) or
(f)(2) of this AD, paint cracks around the rivet
heads and in the transition area between the
tailboom and ring frame or between the ring
frame and fenestron housing may be present
and do not create an unsafe condition. If you
are unable to determine whether a crack is
on the paint or on the ring frame, you must
remove the paint to do an accurate
inspection.
(4) If there is a crack in the ring frame,
before further flight, replace it with an
airworthy ring frame.
(5) As an optional terminating action for
the requirements of this AD, you may install
a frame reinforcement to the ring frame and
re-identify the ring frame in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
3.B. of Eurocopter EC135 Service Bulletin
EC135–53–023, as corrected on November 13,
2009, except you are not required to contact
ECD as noted under paragraphs 3.B.(3)
Caution and 3.B.(8).
(g) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits are prohibited.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Sharon Miles,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137; phone (817) 222–5110; email:
sharon.y.miles@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(i) Additional Information
(1) Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) EC135–53A–022, Revision 02,
dated November 30, 2010, which is not
incorporated by reference, contains
additional information about the subject of
this AD. For service information identified in
this AD, contact American Eurocopter
Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, TX 75052, telephone (972) 641–0000
or (800) 232–0323, fax (972) 641–3775, or at
https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You
may review a copy of the service information
at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency AD No.
2010–0254, dated December 20, 2010.
(j) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 5302: Rotorcraft Tailboom.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Jun 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Eurocopter EC135 Service Bulletin
EC135–53–023, as corrected on November 13,
2009. The correction coversheet attached to
this document is dated November 13, 2009;
it describes the correction on page 6 of the
service bulletin. All pages of the corrected
service bulletin show the original issue date
of August 19, 2009. On page 6 of the
corrected service bulletin the date has been
underlined.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Eurocopter service information
identified in this AD, contact American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052, telephone
(972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323, fax (972)
641–3775, or at https://www.eurocopter.com/
techpub.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
(5) You may also view this service
information at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 22,
2012.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–15290 Filed 6–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1257; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–124–AD; Amendment
39–17099; AD 2012–12–19]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
37793
Section 41, in airplanes incorporating
the overhead space utilization (OSU)
option, was found to be under-strength
when subjected to a 9.0 g forward load.
This AD requires installing new
structural members, tie rod(s), and
attach fittings on the left and right sides
of the lowered ceiling support structure.
We are issuing this AD to prevent the
forward lowered ceiling panels and
support structure from becoming
dislodged during a 9.0 g forward load
and consequent injury to personnel or
interference with an emergency
evacuation.
This AD is effective July 30,
2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of July 30, 2012.
DATES:
For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone (206) 544–5000,
extension 1; fax (206) 766–5680; email
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (425) 227–
1221.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
the Boeing Company Model 777–200,
–200LR, and –300ER series airplanes.
This AD was prompted by a report from
the manufacturer indicating that the
lowered ceiling support structure of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Ana
Martinez Hueto, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057–3356; phone: (425) 917–
6592; fax: (425) 917–6591; email:
ana.m.hueto@faa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37790-37793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15290]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0566; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-008-AD;
Amendment 39-17065; AD 2012-11-02]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
supersedes an existing Emergency Airworthiness Directive (EAD) for
certain Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (ECD) Model EC135 helicopters. The
existing EAD, which was previously sent to all known U.S. owners and
operators of ECD Model EC135 helicopters and not made generally
effective by publication in the Federal Register, currently requires
inspecting the ring frame between the rear structure tube (tailboom)
and the tail rotor fenestron housing (fenestron housing) for a crack
before the first flight of each day and replacing any cracked ring
frame with an airworthy ring frame. Since we issued that EAD, we have
determined that a pre-flight pilot check in conjunction with a
recurring 25-hour inspection is sufficient for determining the
airworthiness of the ring frame. Additionally, ECD has developed a
modification that is terminating action for the requirements of that
EAD. This superseding AD revises the inspection requirements of the EAD
to allow an owner/operator to perform the pre-flight pilot check, adds
a recurring inspection of the ring frame, and allows for installation
of a ring frame reinforcement as an optional terminating action for the
AD requirements. The actions are intended to detect a crack in the ring
frame which could result in loss of the fenestron structure and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July 10, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain documents listed in this AD as of July 10, 2012.
We must receive comments on this AD by August 24, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in this AD, contact American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052,
telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323, fax (972) 641-3775, or at
https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review a copy of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Miles, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; phone (817) 222-5110; email:
sharon.y.miles@faa.gov.
[[Page 37791]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, we
invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that resulted
from adopting this AD. The most helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the AD, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time. We will file in the docket all comments that
we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking during the
comment period. We will consider all the comments we receive and may
conduct additional rulemaking based on those comments.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA EAD
No.: 2008-0190-E, dated October 13, 2008 (EAD 2008-0190-E), to correct
an unsafe condition for EC135 and EC635 model helicopters. EASA advises
that, during a recent pre-flight check on an EC 135 helicopter, a crack
was detected on the ring frame that connects the tail rotor fenestron
housing to the rear structure tube (tailboom). EASA states that this
condition, if not corrected, could lead to crack propagation remaining
undetected, possibly resulting in loss of the fenestron structure and
loss of control of the helicopter. EAD 2008-0190-E requires
accomplishing a pilot pre-flight check of the rear structure tube for
cracks before each first flight of the day; amending the flight manual
to reflect the pilot pre-flight check; within 25 flight hours, having
the rear structure tube inspected for cracks by a mechanic; and, if any
cracks are detected contacting ECD for approved corrective actions.
On October 16, 2008, we issued EAD No. 2008-22-51 (EAD 2008-22-51)
for the ECD Model EC135 helicopter. That EAD requires, before further
flight and thereafter before the first flight of each day, visually
inspecting the ring frame between the tailboom and fenestron housing
for a crack, and replacing the ring frame with an airworthy ring frame
if there is a crack. That EAD resulted from two reports of cracks on
the ring frame connecting the tail rotor fenestron housing to the
tailboom. The first crack was discovered in Germany and is discussed in
EAD 2008-0190-E. The second crack, which was 9 inches long, was
discovered in the U.S. and was in the same area as the first reported
crack. We issued EAD 2008-22-51 to detect a crack in the ring frame,
which could result in loss of the fenestron structure and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
Actions Since Existing EAD Was Issued
Since we issued EAD 2008-22-51, EASA issued AD No.: 2009-0065,
dated March 13, 2009 (AD 2009-0065), which supersedes EAD 2008-0190-E.
AD 2009-0065 retains the requirements of EAD 2008-0190-E, expands the
applicability to EC 135 helicopters manufactured in Spain, and adds a
repetitive 100-hour inspection of the rear fuselage structure area for
cracks.
EASA next issued AD No.: 2009-0065R1, dated September 8, 2009 (AD
2009-0065R1), which revises AD 2009-0065. EASA advises that ECD has
developed a modification (reinforcement) of the aft ring frame,
including a part number (P/N) change, for both production and in-
service application. Consequently, AD 2009-0065R1 retains the
inspection requirements of AD 2009-0065 but limits its applicability to
helicopters without the reinforced aft ring frame installed, and allows
installation of the reinforced aft ring frame as an optional
terminating action for the repetitive checks and inspections.
EASA then issued AD No.: 2010-0254, dated December 20, 2010 (AD
2010-0254), which supersedes AD 2009-0065R1. AD 2010-0254 retains the
repetitive inspection requirements of AD 2009-0065R1, but reduces the
interval of the visual inspection from 100 hours to 25 hours and
requires installation of the reinforced aft ring frame within 12 months
as terminating action for the repetitive checks and inspections.
Since we issued EAD 2008-22-51, we have determined that a pre-
flight pilot check in conjunction with a recurring 25-hour inspection
is sufficient for determining the airworthiness of the ring frame.
Therefore, we are issuing this AD to revise the inspection
requirements, as well as allow for the optional terminating action
developed by ECD.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
Germany and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with Germany, EASA, their technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
the EASA AD. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition is
likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of these same type
designs.
Related Service Information
We reviewed ECD Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) EC135-53A-
022, Revision 02, dated November 30, 2010 (ASB EC135-53A-022). ASB
EC135-53A-022 describes procedures for a pilot check of the ring frame
during the preflight check. ASB EC135-53A-022 additionally prescribes a
recurring inspection of the ring frame every 25 flight hours and
accomplishment of ECD Service Bulletin EC135-53-023, as corrected
November 13, 2009 (SB EC135-53-023), which describes procedures to
attach a frame reinforcement to the ring frame. The correction
coversheet attached to SB EC135-53-023 is dated November 13, 2009; it
describes the correction on page 6 of the service bulletin. All pages
of the corrected service bulletin show the original issue date of
August 19, 2009; the date has been underlined on page 6 of the
corrected service bulletin. Accomplishment of SB EC135-53-023
constitutes terminating action for the visual inspection requirements
of ASB EC135-53A-022.
AD Requirements
This AD supersedes EAD 2008-22-51 and requires the following:
Before further flight, and thereafter at each preflight
check, performing a visual check of the ring frame which connects the
tail rotor Fenestron housing to the tailboom for a crack. An owner/
operator (pilot) may perform this check because it involves only a
visual check for a crack in the ring frame and can be performed equally
well by a pilot or a mechanic.
Within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS), and every 25 hours
TIS thereafter, removing the tail rotor drive shaft paneling and
inspecting the ring frame for a crack.
As an optional terminating action for the requirements of
this AD, installing a frame reinforcement to the ring frame and re-
identifying the ring frame by following specified portions of the
manufacturer's service bulletin.
[[Page 37792]]
Differences Between This AD and the EASA AD
This AD differs from the EASA AD as follows:
The EASA AD requires amendment of the Flight Manual with a
page from ASB EC135-53A-022. Following issuance of the EASA AD, a
revision has been published for the Flight Manuals and the amended
pages are no longer issued with ASB EC135-53A-022. Therefore, this AD
does not require this.
The EASA AD requires modification of the aft ring frame
within 12 months as terminating action; this AD provides it as an
optional terminating action.
The EASA AD applies to the Model EC 635 helicopter, and
this AD does not include this model because it does not have an FAA-
issued type certificate.
The EASA AD includes a ``tolerance'' range for
accomplishment of the pilot check and visual inspections. This AD does
not allow this.
Interim Action
We consider this AD interim action. We are currently considering
requiring the installation of the ECD-developed ring frame modification
as terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements of
this AD. However, the planned compliance time for the installation of
the modification would allow enough time to provide notice and
opportunity for prior public comment on the merits of the modification.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 226 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in
order to comply with this AD. Inspecting the ring frame requires .5
work-hour at an average labor rate of $85 per hour, for a cost per
inspection cycle of $42.50 per helicopter, and a cost to the fleet of
$9,605. Replacing a cracked ring frame will require about 8 work hours
at an average labor rate of $85 per hour, and a parts cost of $7,425,
for a total cost per helicopter of $8,105. Modifying and re-identifying
the ring frame requires 17 work-hours and a parts cost of $1,320, for a
total cost per helicopter of $2,765 and the cost to the fleet is
$624,890.
According to the manufacturer, they will cover all parts costs for
a cracked ring frame, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
persons. However, as we do not control such coverage by the
manufacturer, we have included all costs in our cost estimate.
FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date
Providing an opportunity for public comments prior to adopting
these AD requirements would delay implementing the safety actions
needed to correct this known unsafe condition. Therefore, we find that
the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment
prior to the adoption of this rule because some of the required checks
and inspections must be accomplished before further flight.
Since an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we determined that notice and opportunity for
public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good
cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2012-11-02 Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH: Amendment 39-17065; Docket
No. FAA-2012-0566; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-008-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Model EC135 helicopters with a ring frame,
part number (P/N) L535A3501230, installed, certificated in any
category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in the ring
frame connecting the rear structure tube (tailboom) and the tail
rotor fenestron housing. This condition could result in loss of the
fenestron structure and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
(c) Other Affected ADs
This AD supersedes Emergency AD 2008-22-51, dated October 16,
2008.
(d) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective July 10, 2012.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) Before further flight, and thereafter at before the first
flight of the day, visually check the ring frame that connects the
tail rotor fenestron housing to the tailboom for a crack. This
action may be performed by the owner/operator (pilot) holding at
least a private pilot certificate, and must be entered into the
aircraft records showing compliance with this AD in accordance with
14 CFR 43.9 (a)(1)-(4) and 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v). The record must
be maintained as required by 14 CFR 91.173, 121.380, or 135.439.
[[Page 37793]]
(2) Within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS), and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 25 hours TIS, remove the tail rotor
driveshaft paneling and visually inspect the ring frame for a crack.
(3) While performing a check or an inspection as required in
paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, paint cracks around the rivet
heads and in the transition area between the tailboom and ring frame
or between the ring frame and fenestron housing may be present and
do not create an unsafe condition. If you are unable to determine
whether a crack is on the paint or on the ring frame, you must
remove the paint to do an accurate inspection.
(4) If there is a crack in the ring frame, before further
flight, replace it with an airworthy ring frame.
(5) As an optional terminating action for the requirements of
this AD, you may install a frame reinforcement to the ring frame and
re-identify the ring frame in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.B. of Eurocopter EC135 Service Bulletin
EC135-53-023, as corrected on November 13, 2009, except you are not
required to contact ECD as noted under paragraphs 3.B.(3) Caution
and 3.B.(8).
(g) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits are prohibited.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Sharon Miles, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; phone (817) 222-5110;
email: sharon.y.miles@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(i) Additional Information
(1) Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) EC135-53A-
022, Revision 02, dated November 30, 2010, which is not incorporated
by reference, contains additional information about the subject of
this AD. For service information identified in this AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie,
TX 75052, telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323, fax (972) 641-
3775, or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review a copy
of the service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency AD No. 2010-0254, dated December 20, 2010.
(j) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 5302: Rotorcraft
Tailboom.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Eurocopter EC135 Service Bulletin EC135-53-023, as corrected
on November 13, 2009. The correction coversheet attached to this
document is dated November 13, 2009; it describes the correction on
page 6 of the service bulletin. All pages of the corrected service
bulletin show the original issue date of August 19, 2009. On page 6
of the corrected service bulletin the date has been underlined.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Eurocopter service information identified in this AD,
contact American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, TX 75052, telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323, fax
(972) 641-3775, or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room
663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
(5) You may also view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 22, 2012.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-15290 Filed 6-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P