Product Change-Parcel Select and Parcel Return Service Negotiated Service Agreement, 37078 [2012-14936]
Download as PDF
37078
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 20, 2012 / Notices
contribution toward the requisite 5.5
percent of the Postal Service’s
institutional costs. Id., Attachment D at
1. Mr. Nicoski contends that there will
be no issue of subsidization of market
dominant products by competitive
products as a result of the instant
contract. Id.
Instant contract. The Postal Service
included a redacted version of the
instant contract with the Request. Id.,
Attachment B. It is scheduled to become
effective on the day the Commission
issues all necessary regulatory
approvals. Id., Attachment B at 3. The
contract will expire 3 years from the
effective date unless, among other
things, either party terminates the
agreement with 30 days written notice
to the other party. Id. The Postal Service
represents that the instant contract is
consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id.,
Attachment E.
The Postal Service filed much of its
supporting materials, including the
unredacted version of the instant
contract, under seal. Id., Attachment F.
It maintains that the unredacted
Governors’ Decision, the unredacted
version of the instant contract, and
supporting documents establishing
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633 and 39
CFR 3015.5 should remain confidential.
Request at 1. The Postal Service asks the
Commission to protect customeridentifying information from public
disclosure indefinitely. Id.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2012–25 and CP2012–33 to
consider the Request and the instant
contract, respectively.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s filings in these dockets are
consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C.
3632, 3633, and 3642, 39 CFR 3015.5,
and 39 CFR part 3020, subpart B.
Comments are due no later than June 25,
2012. The public portions of these
filings can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Natalie Rea
Ward to serve as Public Representative
in these dockets.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2012–25 and CP2012–33 to
consider the matters raised in each
docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Natalie
Rea Ward is appointed to serve as an
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Jun 19, 2012
Jkt 226001
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
3. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
June 25, 2012.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–14959 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Product Change—Parcel Select and
Parcel Return Service Negotiated
Service Agreement
Postal ServiceTM.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service gives
notice of filing a request with the Postal
Regulatory Commission to add a
domestic shipping services contract to
the list of Negotiated Service
Agreements in the Mail Classification
Schedule’s Competitive Products List.
DATES: June 20, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 13, 2012,
it filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a Request of the United
States Postal Service to Add Parcel
Select & Parcel Return Service Contract
4 to Competitive Product List.
Documents are available at
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2012–25,
CP2012–33.
SUMMARY:
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2012–14936 Filed 6–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 10f–3; SEC File No. 270–237; OMB
Control No. 3235–0226.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
discussed below. The Commission plans
to submit these existing collections of
information to the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
Section 10(f) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’)
prohibits a registered investment
company (‘‘fund’’) from purchasing any
security during an underwriting or
selling syndicate if the fund has certain
relationships with a principal
underwriter for the security.1 Congress
enacted this provision in 1940 to protect
funds and their shareholders by
preventing underwriters from
‘‘dumping’’ unmarketable securities on
affiliated funds.
Rule 10f–3 permits a fund to engage
in a securities transaction that otherwise
would violate Section 10(f) if, among
other things: (i) Each transaction
effected under the rule is reported on
Form N–SAR; (ii) the fund’s directors
have approved procedures for purchases
made in reliance on the rule, regularly
review fund purchases to determine
whether they comply with these
procedures, and approve necessary
changes to the procedures; and (iii) a
written record of each transaction
effected under the rule is maintained for
six years, the first two of which in an
easily accessible place.2 The written
record must state: (i) From whom the
securities were acquired; (ii) the identity
of the underwriting syndicate’s
members; (iii) the terms of the
transactions; and (iv) the information or
materials on which the fund’s board of
directors has determined that the
purchases were made in compliance
with procedures established by the
board.
Rule 10f–3 also conditionally allows
managed portions of fund portfolios to
purchase securities offered in otherwise
off-limits primary offerings. To qualify
for this exemption, rule 10f–3 requires
that the subadviser that is advising the
purchaser be contractually prohibited
from providing investment advice to
any other portion of the fund’s portfolio
and consulting with any other of the
fund’s advisers that is a principal
underwriter or affiliated person of a
principal underwriter concerning the
fund’s securities transactions.
These requirements provide a
mechanism for fund boards to oversee
compliance with the rule. The required
recordkeeping facilitates the
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
U.S.C. 80a–10(f).
CFR 270.10f–3.
20JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 37078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14936]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
Product Change--Parcel Select and Parcel Return Service
Negotiated Service Agreement
AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.
DATES: June 20, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg]
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on
June 13, 2012, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request
of the United States Postal Service to Add Parcel Select & Parcel
Return Service Contract 4 to Competitive Product List. Documents are
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2012-25, CP2012-33.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2012-14936 Filed 6-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P