Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Michigan; PSD Regulations, 36442-36443 [2012-14937]
Download as PDF
36442
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(2) Mariners can request permission to
transit through the safety zone from the
Patrol Commander. The Patrol
Commander can be contacted on VHF–
FM channels 16 and 23.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: May 30, 2012.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2012–14845 Filed 6–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0826; FRL–9689–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Michigan; PSD Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD)
construction permit program of State of
Michigan’s State Implementation Plan
(SIP) to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA)
requirements for PSD in Class I Areas
attaining the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 19, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2011–0826, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: damico.genevieve@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 385–5501.
4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air
Permits Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico,
Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:50 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2011–
0826. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
recommend that you telephone
Constantine Blathras, Environmental
Engineer, at (312) 886–0671 before
visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Constantine Blathras, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0671,
Blathras.Constantine@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
II. What revisions are included in the
proposed approval?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
When submitting comments,
remember to:
1. Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
2. Follow directions—EPA may ask
you to respond to specific questions or
organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
4. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
5. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
6. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
7. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
8. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. What revisions are included in the
proposed approval?
On September 2, 2011, the Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ) submitted to EPA for approval
a revision to the Michigan SIP
consisting of amendments to Michigan
Air Pollution Control Rules, Part 18,
PSD, and Part 19, PSD for major sources.
Specifically, Michigan submitted a
revision to modify Michigan Air
Pollution Control Rule R. 336.2816 to
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
make it consistent with the Federal
requirements for PSD in Class I Areas.
Additionally, Michigan submitted
amendments to modify Michigan’s Air
Pollution Control Rules R. 336.2801 and
R. 336.2910 to add a significance
threshold of 10 tons per year for
particulate matter less than 2.5 microns
in size (PM2.5). However, EPA is not
proposing action on the particulate
matter amendments in this rulemaking
action; we will propose action at a later
date, when Michigan submits additional
rules pertaining to its definitions for
PM2.5.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve
Michigan’s request to revise its SIP to
add rule R. 336.2816 to be consistent
with Federal PSD regulations in 40 CFR
51.166(p), that require state PSD
programs to have a mechanism in place
to coordinate and consult with Federal
land managers of Class I PSD Areas. On
September 16, 2008, EPA proposed to
disapprove R 336.2816 from Michigan’s
SIP submittal because it did not provide
for such a mechanism. Michigan has
now revised R. 336.2816 to be
consistent with the Federal requirement.
With this change, EPA is proposing to
fully approve the revised R. 336.2816
for its PSD program. On March 25, 2010,
EPA published a direct final approval to
convert a conditional approval of the
Michigan PSD SIP to full approval
under section 110 of the CAA. In that
notice, EPA stated that we would be
taking a separate action on rule R.
336.2816(2) through (4)(requirements
relating to Class I Areas).
EPA is not proposing to approve
Michigan’s request to revise its SIP by
adding requirements for a significance
level for PM2.5. EPA has established a
significance threshold to limit the
applicability of PSD regulations to
sources with emissions above the
significance level. To be consistent with
the Federal requirements, Michigan
amended R. 336.2801 and R. 336.2901
to add the significance threshold for
PM2.5. Because Michigan is planning to
submit additional state rules as
revisions to its SIP for precursors of
PM2.5, EPA will defer action on this
matter.
EPA is also proposing to approve the
removal of R. 336.2830 and R. 336.2910
from the Michigan SIP. Appeals of state
permit actions will be handled through
the state’s appeal process.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:50 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
In May 2011, EPA issued its policy on
consultation and coordination with
Indian tribes. EPA explained that its
policy is to consult on a government to
government basis with Federally
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36443
recognized tribal governments when
EPA actions and decisions may affect
tribal interests. Accordingly, EPA sent
an invitation to consult with potentially
interested tribes, and subsequently
engaged in consultation with
representatives of the Forest County
Potawatomi Community regarding the
Michigan proposed SIP revisions.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 11, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2012–14937 Filed 6–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2007–1034; FRL–9689–1]
Disapproval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Utah; Revisions To Open Burning
Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to
disapprove a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of
Utah on December 10, 1999. This
revision to R307–202 Emission
Standards: General Burning authorizes
the State to extend the time period for
open burning. EPA is proposing to
disapprove the submitted revision
because it does not meet the
requirements of section 110(l) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA). This action is
being taken under section 110 of the
CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 19, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2007–1034, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: freeman.crystal@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19JNP1.SGM
19JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36442-36443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14937]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0826; FRL-9689-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Michigan; PSD Regulations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) construction permit program of State of
Michigan's State Implementation Plan (SIP) to meet the Clean Air Act
(CAA) requirements for PSD in Class I Areas attaining the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 19, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2011-0826, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: damico.genevieve@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 385-5501.
4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2011-0826. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
We recommend that you telephone Constantine Blathras, Environmental
Engineer, at (312) 886-0671 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constantine Blathras, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-0671, Blathras.Constantine@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
II. What revisions are included in the proposed approval?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
When submitting comments, remember to:
1. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
2. Follow directions--EPA may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
4. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
5. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
6. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
7. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
8. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
II. What revisions are included in the proposed approval?
On September 2, 2011, the Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality (MDEQ) submitted to EPA for approval a revision to the Michigan
SIP consisting of amendments to Michigan Air Pollution Control Rules,
Part 18, PSD, and Part 19, PSD for major sources. Specifically,
Michigan submitted a revision to modify Michigan Air Pollution Control
Rule R. 336.2816 to
[[Page 36443]]
make it consistent with the Federal requirements for PSD in Class I
Areas. Additionally, Michigan submitted amendments to modify Michigan's
Air Pollution Control Rules R. 336.2801 and R. 336.2910 to add a
significance threshold of 10 tons per year for particulate matter less
than 2.5 microns in size (PM2.5). However, EPA is not
proposing action on the particulate matter amendments in this
rulemaking action; we will propose action at a later date, when
Michigan submits additional rules pertaining to its definitions for
PM2.5.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve Michigan's request to revise its SIP to
add rule R. 336.2816 to be consistent with Federal PSD regulations in
40 CFR 51.166(p), that require state PSD programs to have a mechanism
in place to coordinate and consult with Federal land managers of Class
I PSD Areas. On September 16, 2008, EPA proposed to disapprove R
336.2816 from Michigan's SIP submittal because it did not provide for
such a mechanism. Michigan has now revised R. 336.2816 to be consistent
with the Federal requirement. With this change, EPA is proposing to
fully approve the revised R. 336.2816 for its PSD program. On March 25,
2010, EPA published a direct final approval to convert a conditional
approval of the Michigan PSD SIP to full approval under section 110 of
the CAA. In that notice, EPA stated that we would be taking a separate
action on rule R. 336.2816(2) through (4)(requirements relating to
Class I Areas).
EPA is not proposing to approve Michigan's request to revise its
SIP by adding requirements for a significance level for
PM2.5. EPA has established a significance threshold to limit
the applicability of PSD regulations to sources with emissions above
the significance level. To be consistent with the Federal requirements,
Michigan amended R. 336.2801 and R. 336.2901 to add the significance
threshold for PM2.5. Because Michigan is planning to submit
additional state rules as revisions to its SIP for precursors of
PM2.5, EPA will defer action on this matter.
EPA is also proposing to approve the removal of R. 336.2830 and R.
336.2910 from the Michigan SIP. Appeals of state permit actions will be
handled through the state's appeal process.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
In May 2011, EPA issued its policy on consultation and coordination
with Indian tribes. EPA explained that its policy is to consult on a
government to government basis with Federally recognized tribal
governments when EPA actions and decisions may affect tribal interests.
Accordingly, EPA sent an invitation to consult with potentially
interested tribes, and subsequently engaged in consultation with
representatives of the Forest County Potawatomi Community regarding the
Michigan proposed SIP revisions.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 11, 2012.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2012-14937 Filed 6-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P