U.S. Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Notice of Meeting, 36492-36493 [2012-14917]
Download as PDF
36492
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
authenticity of credentials held by their
financial advisors and planners? What
sources have been found most helpful,
accurate, and thorough? Among other
things, comments could address issues
such as state or organizational level
review standards, evaluation practices,
or selection criteria to determine the
validity of proposed senior certifications
or designations.
2. How effective are the existing
sources at maintaining the legitimacy,
value, and authenticity of credentials
held by senior financial advisors and
planners?
3. How effectively do existing
accountability controls deter the misuse
of senior advisor credentials? Examples
of accountability controls include
revoking credentials, public notices of
disapproval, or other disciplinary
actions.
Providing Financial Advice and
Planning Information to Seniors
4. What resources are available to
explain the subject matter expertise
presented or implied by specific
certifications and designations? How
effective are the publicly available
sources at disseminating thorough, upto-date information? How effectively are
seniors able to use the available
resources to select a financial advisor
with appropriate knowledge to address
their specific financial needs?
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Senior Certification and Designation
Information Sources
5. What sources of information on the
fraudulent or misleading uses of senior
certifications and designations are
available? Comments could include,
among other things, references to
publicly available research or data sets,
suggestions for other potentially
available research or data, or other
information on enforcement, civil,
administrative, or criminal cases.
Financial Literacy Efforts
6. What financial education,
counseling, or personal finance
management programs are tailored to
the unique financial needs of older
Americans and their families or
caregivers? Among these programs,
what are the best practices in providing
seniors financial literacy and robust,
practical information on personal
finance management? Possible
comments could address methods for
improving recognition of unfair or
deceptive financial practices; means for
helping seniors plan for retirement,
long-term care, and economic security;
or approaches to consumer credit
counseling and other financial literacy
or financial protection practices.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
Financial Exploitation of Older
Americans
7. What types of fraudulent, unfair,
abusive or deceptive practices target
Americans age 62 and over? Comments
could include unique types of financial
exploitation or additional information
concerning the examples listed below.
a. Power of Attorney or Guardian
Abuse, whereby an agent under power
of attorney or a court-appointed
guardian uses his/her fiduciary
authority (or a forged power of attorney
instrument) to misappropriate the older
person’s assets and uses them for
personal gain rather than for the support
of the incapacitated older person; and
b. Affinity fraud, in which the
characteristics of a trusted advisor such
as a member of the clergy or government
official are impersonated by those
attempting to extract payments or
personal information from an older
person.
Financial Exploitation of Older
Veterans of the Armed Forces
8. What types of fraudulent or
deceptive practices target older veterans
and/or military retirees? Comments
could include unique examples of
financial exploitation or additional
information concerning the examples
listed below.
a. VA Aid and Attendance fraud,
whereby veterans are advised to transfer
retirement funds into irrevocable trusts
that cause them to lose access to the
funds and also become ineligible for
Medicaid benefits; or,
b. Military pension buyout schemes,
in which veterans are offered cash
payments in return for their military
pension payouts in a manner that could
ultimately deprive the veteran of the
majority of his or her pension.
Dated: April 27, 2012.
Meredith Fuchs,
Chief of Staff, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2012–14854 Filed 6–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
U.S. Air Force Scientific Advisory
Board Notice of Meeting
U.S. Air Force Scientific
Advisory Board, Department of the Air
Force.
ACTION: Meeting notice.
AGENCY:
Due to difficulties, beyond the
control of the U.S. Air Force Scientific
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Advisory Board or its Designated
Federal Officer, the Board was unable to
file a Federal Register notice for the
June 27–28, 2012 meeting of the U.S.
Air Force Scientific Advisory Board as
required by 41 CFR 102–3.150(a).
Accordingly, the Advisory Committee
Management Officer for the Department
of Defense, pursuant to
41 CFR 102–3.150(b), waives the
15-calendar day notification
requirement.
Under the provisions of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act of 1972
(5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the
Government in the Sunshine Act of
1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and
41 CFR 102–3.150, the Department of
Defense announces that the United
States Air Force Scientific Advisory
Board (SAB) meeting will take place 27–
28 June 2012 at the Secretary of the Air
Force Technical and Analytical Support
Conference Center, 1550 Crystal Drive,
Arlington, VA 22202. The meeting will
be from 7:30 a.m.–4:40 p.m. on
Wednesday, 27 June 2012, with the
sessions from 7:30 a.m.–9:30 a.m. open
to the public; and 7:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m.
on Thursday, 28 June 2012, with the
sessions from 7:30 a.m.–10:00 a.m. and
1:30 p.m.–2:00 p.m. open to the public.
The banquet from 6:00 p.m.–8:45 p.m.
on 28 June 2012 at the Key Bridge
Marriott, 1401 Lee Highway, Arlington,
VA 22201 will also be open to the
public.
The purpose of this Air Force
Scientific Advisory Board quarterly
meeting is to discuss and deliberate the
findings of the FY12 SAB studies
covering non-traditional intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance in
contested environments; ensuring cyber
situational awareness for commanders;
and extended uses of Air Force Space
Command space-based sensors. The
draft FY13 SAB study topic Terms of
Reference and potential sites for the
FY13 Spring Board quarterly meeting
will also be discussed.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b, as
amended, and 41 CFR 102–3.155, The
Administrative Assistant of the Air
Force, in consultation with the Air
Force General Counsel, has agreed that
the public interest requires some
sessions of the United States Air Force
Scientific Advisory Board meeting be
closed to the public because they will
discuss information and matters covered
by section 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1). Any
member of the public wishing to
provide input to the United States Air
Force Scientific Advisory Board should
submit a written statement in
accordance with 41 CFR 102–3.140(c)
and section 10(a)(3) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act and the
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2012 / Notices
procedures described in this paragraph.
Written statements can be submitted to
the Designated Federal Officer at the
address detailed below at any time.
Statements being submitted in response
to the agenda mentioned in this notice
must be received by the Designated
Federal Officer at the address listed
below at least five calendar days prior
to the meeting which is the subject of
this notice. Written statements received
after this date may not be provided to
or considered by the United States Air
Force Scientific Advisory Board until its
next meeting. The Designated Federal
Officer will review all timely
submissions with the United States Air
Force Scientific Advisory Board
Chairperson and ensure they are
provided to members of the United
States Air Force Scientific Advisory
Board before the meeting that is the
subject of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
United States Air Force Scientific
Advisory Board Executive Director and
Designated Federal Officer, Lt Col
Matthew E. Zuber, 240–612–5503,
United States Air Force Scientific
Advisory Board, 1500 West Perimeter
Road, Ste. #3300, Joint Base Andrews,
MD 20762,
matthew.zuber@pentagon.af.mil.
Henry Williams Jr.,
DAF Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–14917 Filed 6–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Submission for OMB Review;
Institute of Education Sciences;
National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP) 2013 Wave II (Main
NAEP Core, Reading, Mathematics,
TEL, SD, ELL, and Special Studies)
The National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP) is a
federally authorized survey of student
achievement at grades 4, 8, and 12 in
various subject areas, such as
mathematics, reading, writing, science,
U.S. history, civics, geography,
economics, and the arts.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before July 19,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding burden and/or the collection
activity requirements should be
electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or mailed to U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., LBJ, Washington, DC
20202–4537. Copies of the proposed
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:39 Jun 18, 2012
Jkt 226001
information collection request may be
accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 04874. When you access
the information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
Requests may also be electronically
mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed
to 202–401–0920. Please specify the
complete title of the information
collection and OMB Control Number
when making your request.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339.
Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that Federal agencies provide interested
parties an early opportunity to comment
on information collection requests. The
Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Privacy, Information
and Records Management Services,
Office of Management, publishes this
notice containing proposed information
collection requests at the beginning of
the Departmental review of the
information collection. The Department
of Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: National
Assessment of Educational Progress
(NAEP) 2013 Wave II (Main NAEP Core,
Reading, Mathematics, TEL, SD, ELL,
and Special Studies).
OMB Control Number: 1850–0790.
Type of Review: Revision.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 285,527.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 106,602.
Abstract: The NAEP is a federally
authorized survey of student
achievement at grades 4, 8, and 12 in
various subject areas, such as
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36493
mathematics, reading, writing, science,
U.S. history, civics, geography,
economics, and the arts. In the current
legislation that reauthorized NAEP (Pub.
L. 107–279), Congress mandated the
collection of national education survey
data through a national assessment
program. The 2013 Wave 2 submittal
contains (a) the grades 4, 8, and 12 core
(demographic) student background
questions, (b) the pilot grades 4, 8, and
operational grade 12 reading and
mathematics subject-specific student
background questions, (c) the pilot
grade 8 Technology and Engineering
Literacy (TEL) background questions,
(d) the grade 4, 8, and 12 reading and
mathematics special study background
questions, (e) the grade 4 and 8 teacher
and the grade 4, 8, and 12 school
questionnaires, and (f) Students with
Disabilities (SD) and English Language
Learner (ELL) worksheets and
instructions.
Dated: June 14, 2012.
Darrin A. King,
Director, Information Collection Clearance
Division, Privacy, Information and Records
Management Services, Office of Management.
[FR Doc. 2012–14898 Filed 6–18–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards:
Technical Assistance and
Dissemination To Improve Services
and Results for Children With
Disabilities; Technical Assistance
Center for Inclusive School-Wide
Reform
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Overview Information
Technical Assistance and
Dissemination to Improve Services and
Results for Children with Disabilities—
Technical Assistance Center for
Inclusive School-Wide Reform Notice
inviting applications for new awards for
fiscal year (FY) 2012.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.326Y.
Applications Available: June 19,
2012.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: August 3, 2012.
DATES:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Technical Assistance and
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36492-36493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14917]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
U.S. Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Notice of Meeting
AGENCY: U.S. Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, Department of the Air
Force.
ACTION: Meeting notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Due to difficulties, beyond the control of the U.S. Air Force
Scientific Advisory Board or its Designated Federal Officer, the Board
was unable to file a Federal Register notice for the June 27-28, 2012
meeting of the U.S. Air Force Scientific Advisory Board as required by
41 CFR 102-3.150(a). Accordingly, the Advisory Committee Management
Officer for the Department of Defense, pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.150(b),
waives the 15-calendar day notification requirement.
Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972
(5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of
1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150, the Department
of Defense announces that the United States Air Force Scientific
Advisory Board (SAB) meeting will take place 27-28 June 2012 at the
Secretary of the Air Force Technical and Analytical Support Conference
Center, 1550 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202. The meeting will be
from 7:30 a.m.-4:40 p.m. on Wednesday, 27 June 2012, with the sessions
from 7:30 a.m.-9:30 a.m. open to the public; and 7:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m. on
Thursday, 28 June 2012, with the sessions from 7:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m. and
1:30 p.m.-2:00 p.m. open to the public. The banquet from 6:00 p.m.-8:45
p.m. on 28 June 2012 at the Key Bridge Marriott, 1401 Lee Highway,
Arlington, VA 22201 will also be open to the public.
The purpose of this Air Force Scientific Advisory Board quarterly
meeting is to discuss and deliberate the findings of the FY12 SAB
studies covering non-traditional intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance in contested environments; ensuring cyber situational
awareness for commanders; and extended uses of Air Force Space Command
space-based sensors. The draft FY13 SAB study topic Terms of Reference
and potential sites for the FY13 Spring Board quarterly meeting will
also be discussed.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended, and 41 CFR 102-3.155,
The Administrative Assistant of the Air Force, in consultation with the
Air Force General Counsel, has agreed that the public interest requires
some sessions of the United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board
meeting be closed to the public because they will discuss information
and matters covered by section 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1). Any member of the
public wishing to provide input to the United States Air Force
Scientific Advisory Board should submit a written statement in
accordance with 41 CFR 102-3.140(c) and section 10(a)(3) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act and the
[[Page 36493]]
procedures described in this paragraph. Written statements can be
submitted to the Designated Federal Officer at the address detailed
below at any time. Statements being submitted in response to the agenda
mentioned in this notice must be received by the Designated Federal
Officer at the address listed below at least five calendar days prior
to the meeting which is the subject of this notice. Written statements
received after this date may not be provided to or considered by the
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board until its next
meeting. The Designated Federal Officer will review all timely
submissions with the United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board
Chairperson and ensure they are provided to members of the United
States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board before the meeting that is
the subject of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The United States Air Force Scientific
Advisory Board Executive Director and Designated Federal Officer, Lt
Col Matthew E. Zuber, 240-612-5503, United States Air Force Scientific
Advisory Board, 1500 West Perimeter Road, Ste. 3300, Joint
Base Andrews, MD 20762, matthew.zuber@pentagon.af.mil.
Henry Williams Jr.,
DAF Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-14917 Filed 6-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P