Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 36146-36149 [2012-14048]
Download as PDF
36146
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1)You must use the following service
information to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the
following service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 717–
55A0011, dated May 17, 2011.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC
D800–0019, Long Beach, California 90846–
0001; phone: 206–544–5000, extension 2; fax:
206–766–5683; Internet: https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 7,
2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–14542 Filed 6–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1170; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–264–AD; Amendment
39–17080; AD 2012–12–01]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
all Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–
600R and A300 F4–600R series
airplanes, Model A300 C4–605R Variant
F airplanes, and Model A310 series
airplanes. That AD currently requires
modifying the wiring in the right-hand
electronics rack. This new AD requires
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jun 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
replacing the cockpit multi-tank
indicators (MTI), and for certain
airplanes, replacing high-level, lowlevel, and overflow sensors and their
harness connectors, and re-instating the
low-level warning indication to the
cockpit MTI. This AD was prompted by
reports of failures of four fuel level
sensor-amplifier and MTI units. This
AD also adds Model A310 series
airplanes to the applicability. We are
issuing this AD to prevent degradation
of the electrical insulation sleeves of the
low-level indication lamps on the MTI,
which could cause a short circuit that
might result in high voltage being
conveyed to the high- and low-level
sensors in the wing tanks. This
condition could cause the level sensor
to heat above acceptable limits, possibly
resulting in a fuel tank explosion, and
consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July
23, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of July 23, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain other publication listed in
this AD as of March 27, 2009 (74 FR
7792, February 20, 2009).
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
been caused by incorrect connector sleeves
materials fitted to the MTI units.
Degradation of the electrical insulation
sleeves of the Low-level indication lamps on
the MTI of the flight deck can cause a short
circuit that might result in high voltage being
conveyed to the high and low level sensors
in the wing tanks. This condition, if not
corrected, could cause the level sensor to
heat above acceptable limits, possibly
resulting in fuel tank explosion, and
consequent loss of the aeroplane.
As an interim action, EASA AD 2008–0055
[which corresponds to FAA AD 2009–02–04,
Amendment 39–15794 (74 FR 7792, February
20, 2009)], was issued requiring the
accomplishment of wiring modifications to
protect the FLSA and the Flight Warning
Computers from 115V [volt] AC [alternating
current] and 28V DC [direct current] short
circuits within the cockpit MTI.
EASA AD 2009–0144, which required the
replacement of the affected sensors and their
harness connectors with modified units in
accordance with the instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin (SB) A300–28–6095 at
original issue or SB A300–28–9013 at
original issue, as applicable, was further on
cancelled because the installation of the new
inner tank fused low-level sensors was not
possible, due to interference between some
sensors and a fuel pipe at connector level.
Airbus SB A300–28–6095 and SB A300–
28–9013 have been revised to clear this
interference. The replacement of the affected
sensors and their harness connectors
according to the instructions of these SBs is
now possible.
This [EASA] AD supersedes [EASA] AD
2008–0055 and introduces the following
actions:
—Expanding of the applicability to A310
aeroplanes; and
—Replacement of the cockpit MTI with a
MTI with silicone sleeves and to reinstate
the low level warning indication to the
cockpit MTI; and
—Replacement of the affected sensors and
their harness connectors by fused level
sensor units for A300–600 and A300–
600ST aeroplanes.
Discussion
California 90712–4137; phone: 562–627–
5357; fax: 562–627–5210; email:
George.Garrido@faa.gov.
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comments received.
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on November 7, 2011 (76 FR
68671), and proposed to supersede AD
2009–02–04, Amendment 39–15794 (74
FR 7792, February 20, 2009). That
NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
One operator experienced failures of four
Fuel Level Sensor-Amplifier (FLSA) and
Multi Tank Indicators (MTI) units. FLSA and
MTI failures have been identified as having
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
Requests for Extension of Compliance
Time
UPS requested that we extend the
compliance time specified in paragraphs
(h), (i), and (j) in the NPRM (76 FR
68671, November 7, 2011) to 60 months.
UPS explained that the requested
extended compliance time is to reduce
the potential for special maintenance
visits of its airplanes, and that a
compliance period of less than 60
months will cause undue hardship on
UPS and its operation, and result in
significant negative economic impact.
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
UPS reasoned that it has an existing
tank entry program that is completed
only during airplane major maintenance
visits at a 5-year time interval, and that
using the existing interval will reduce
the costs to open, purge, close, and
check out the tanks. UPS explained
further, that materials will take a
minimum of 6 months to receive, and
due to the extensive time waiting for
parts, this will force even more
airplanes into a special visit program in
a much shorter period of time than what
the NPRM is proposing.
UPS expressed that it agrees with the
FAA when the premise for establishing
a timeline for completion of an SFAR
(Special Federal Aviation Regulation) 88
project is based on a level of safety as
determined by the NPRM (76 FR 68671,
November 7, 2011) and that it believes
there is a timeframe precedence that has
previously been set by the FAA for a
project of this type. UPS explained that
the FAA released an earlier AD, which
corrected similar actions to the NPRM
(76 FR 68671, November 7, 2011), and
that the earlier AD had a 5-year
compliance requirement. UPS believes
that the same level of safety is achieved
with a 5-year compliance on the Model
A300 airplanes fleet.
FedEx requested that we extend the
compliance time in the NPRM (76 FR
68671, November 7, 2011) to 30 months,
to allow for the accomplishment of the
work to be performed at a scheduled
heavy maintenance event. FedEx
explained that it accomplishes a heavy
maintenance check on its Model A300–
600 and A310 airplanes every 30
months. FedEx reasoned that it would
be 22 hours per airplane to accomplish
the requirements of the service
information and that it is a significant
economic and operational hardship for
it to ‘‘special visit’’ airplanes to
accomplish fuel tank entry.
We do not agree to extend the
compliance time in this final rule. In
developing an appropriate compliance
time for this action, we considered the
urgency associated with the subject
unsafe condition, the availability of
required parts, and the practical aspect
of accomplishing the required
modification within a period of time
that corresponds to the normal
scheduled maintenance for most
affected operators. Under the provisions
of paragraph (m) of the final rule, we
will consider requests for approval of an
extension of the compliance time if
sufficient data are submitted to
substantiate that the new compliance
time would provide an acceptable level
of safety. We have not changed the AD
in this regard.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jun 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
Requests for Revision to Costs of
Compliance
UPS requested that we revise the
Costs of Compliance section in the
NPRM (76 FR 68671, November 7,
2011). UPS explained that it has
determined that the required hours to
complete the NPRM are greater than 150
hours and that the material kits that are
required by Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A300–28–6095, Revision 01,
dated February 2, 2010, are
approximately $40,000 each, which is a
total of $52,750 per airplane. UPS
reasoned that the completion of the
modification on the 53 UPS Model A300
airplanes will be approximately
$2,795,750, which is a significant
negative economic impact on UPS. UPS
expressed that the proposed cost in the
NPRM is only 7.5 percent of the actual
cost that UPS will incur and that the
actual costs will be greater than 13 times
the cost estimates proposed in the
NPRM.
FedEx requested that we acknowledge
that there is an additional material cost
and that our Costs of Compliance
section in the NPRM (76 FR 68671,
November 7, 2011) is underestimated in
terms of financial impact to the
operator. FedEx reasoned that the
estimated parts cost for accomplishment
of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6095, Revision 01, dated
February 2, 2010, only includes the
Airbus manufactured hardware kit (P/N
286095B01R01). FedEx explained that
in order to complete the modification, a
separate Intertechnique kit that includes
the actual sensors and harness
connectors must be procured, and that
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6095, Revision 01, dated
February 2, 2010, provides no warranty
information or pricing for the additional
required kit. FedEx expressed that it is
in the process of obtaining price
information for the additional required
Intertechnique kits and will provide the
data when it becomes available.
We agree to revise the Costs of
Compliance section in this final rule for
the reasons stated by the commenters.
We have revised the Costs of
Compliance section of the final rule to
include the average costs of parts from
Intertechnique.
Revised Paragraph Header and
Wording
We have revised the heading for and
the wording in paragraph (k) of this AD
and the wording of paragraph (g) of this
AD; these changes have not affected the
intent of those paragraphs.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36147
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously—
except for minor editorial changes. We
have determined that these minor
changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (76 FR
68671, November 7, 2011) for correcting
the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 68671,
November 7, 2011).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
about 210 products of U.S. registry. The
actions that are required by AD 2009–
02–04, Amendment 39–15794 (74 FR
7792, February 20, 2009), and retained
in this AD take about 5 work-hours per
product, at an average labor rate of $85
per work-hour. Required parts cost
about $0 per product. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the
currently required actions is $425 per
product.
We estimate that it will take about 44
work-hours per product to comply with
the new basic requirements of this AD.
The average labor rate is $85 per workhour. Required parts will cost about
$39,000 per product. Where the service
information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we
have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be
$8,975,400, or $42,740 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
36148
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM (76 FR 68671,
November 7, 2011), the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jun 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
2009–02–04, Amendment 39–15794 (74
FR 7792, February 20, 2009), and adding
the following new AD:
2012–12–01 Airbus: Amendment 39–17080.
Docket No. FAA–2011–1170; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–264–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
effective July 23, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2009–02–04,
Amendment 39–15794 (74 FR 7792, February
20, 2009).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4–
601, B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–
622R, F4–605R, F4–622R, and C4–605R
Variant F airplanes, and Model A310–203,
–204, –221, –222, –304, –322, –324, and –325
airplanes; certificated in any category; all
certified models, all manufacturer serial
numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28: Fuel.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of
failures of four fuel level sensor-amplifier
and multi-tank indicator (MTI) units. We are
issuing this AD to prevent degradation of the
electrical insulation sleeves of the low-level
indication lamps on the MTI, which could
cause a short circuit that might result in high
voltage being conveyed to the high and low
level sensors in the wing tanks. This
condition could cause the level sensor to heat
above acceptable limits, possibly resulting in
a fuel tank explosion, and consequent loss of
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Retained Actions and Compliance Times
(1) This paragraph restates the actions and
compliance times required by paragraph (f) of
AD 2009–02–04, Amendment 39–15794 (74
FR 7792, February 20, 2009), with no
changes. For Model A300–600 airplanes:
Unless already done, within 3 months after
March 27, 2009 (the effective date of AD
2009–02–04), modify the wiring in the righthand electronics rack in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28A6096,
Revision 02, dated July 4, 2008. Doing the
required actions in paragraph (h) or (i) of this
AD, as applicable, terminates the actions
required by this paragraph.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for the
modification required by paragraph (g)(1) of
this AD, if the modification was performed
before March 27, 2009 (the effective date of
AD 2009–02–04) using Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300–28A6096, dated
October 19, 2007; or Revision 01, dated April
16, 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(h) New Replacement and Re-Instatement for
Certain Model A300–600 Series Airplanes
With New Service Information
For Model A300–600 series airplanes on
which Airbus modification 06213 has been
embodied in production: Within 24 months
after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions required by paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2),
and (h)(3) of this AD. Doing the actions in
this paragraph terminates the requirements of
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.
(1) Replace the cockpit MTI, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–
6101, dated June 4, 2008.
(2) Before further flight after doing the
replacement specified in paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD: Replace the high-level, low-level,
and overflow sensors and their harness
connectors, with fused sensors and new
harness connectors, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–6095,
Revision 01, dated February 2, 2010.
(3) Before further flight after doing the
replacement specified in paragraph (h)(2) of
this AD: Re-instate the low-level warning
indication to the cockpit MTI, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–
6103, Revision 01, dated May 18, 2010.
(i) New Replacement and Re-Instatement for
Certain Other Model A300–600 Series
Airplanes
For Model A300–600 series airplanes on
which Airbus modification 06213 has not
been embodied in production: Within 24
months after the effective date of this AD, do
the actions required by paragraphs (i)(1),
(i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD. Doing the actions
in this paragraph terminates the requirements
of paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.
(1) Replace the cockpit MTI, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–
6101, dated June 4, 2008.
(2) Before further flight after doing the
replacement specified in paragraph (i)(1) of
this AD: Re-instate the low-level warning
indication to the cockpit MTI, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–
6103, Revision 01, dated May 18, 2010.
(3) Before further flight after doing the
action specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this
AD: Replace the high-level, low-level, and
overflow sensors and their harness
connectors, with fused sensors and new
harness connectors, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–6095,
Revision 01, dated February 2, 2010.
(j) New Replacement for Model A310 Series
Airplanes
For Model A310 series airplanes: Within
24 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the cockpit MTI, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A310–28–2167,
dated June 4, 2008.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraphs (h)(3) and
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
(i)(2) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD
using Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6103, dated May 20, 2009.
(l) Parts Installation
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install, on any airplane, any MTI
in the cockpit location, unless it has been
modified in accordance with the applicable
service information listed in paragraphs
(l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), (l)(4), (l)(5), and (l)(6) of
this AD.
(1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6101, dated June 4, 2008.
(2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A310–28–2167, dated June 4, 2008.
(3) GE Service Bulletin 1404KID–28–466,
Revision 1, dated July 15, 2008.
(4) GE Service Bulletin 1406KID–28–467,
Revision 1, dated July 15, 2008.
(5) GE Service Bulletin 1410KID–28–468,
Revision 1, dated July 15, 2008.
(6) GE Service Bulletin 1420KID–28–469,
Revision 1, dated July 23, 2008.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(m) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–2125; fax (425)
227–1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(n) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency Airworthiness Directive 2010–0175,
dated August 18, 2010, and the service
information identified in paragraphs (n)(1),
(n)(2), (n)(3), (n)(4), (n)(5), (n)(6), (n)(7),
(n)(8), and (n)(9) of this AD, for related
information.
(1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6095, Revision 01, dated February
2, 2010.
(2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6101, dated June 4, 2008.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jun 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
(3) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6103, Revision 01, dated May 18,
2010.
(4) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28A6096, Revision 02, dated July 4,
2008.
(5) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A310–28–2167, dated June 4, 2008.
(6) GE Service Bulletin 1404KID–28–466,
Revision 1, dated July 15, 2008.
(7) GE Service Bulletin 1406KID–28–467,
Revision 1, dated July 15, 2008.
(8) GE Service Bulletin 1410KID–28–468,
Revision 1, dated July 15, 2008.
(9) GE Service Bulletin 1420KID–28–469,
Revision 1, dated July 23, 2008.
(o) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) You must use the following service
information to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the
following service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 on the date
specified.
(2) The following service information was
approved for IBR on July 23, 2012:
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6095, Revision 01, dated February
2, 2010.
(ii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6101, dated June 4, 2008.
(iii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6103, Revision 01, dated May 18,
2010.
(iv) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A310–28–2167, dated June 4, 2008.
(v) GE Service Bulletin 1404KID–28–466,
Revision 1, dated July 15, 2008.
(vi) GE Service Bulletin 1406KID–28–467,
Revision 1, dated July 15, 2008.
(vii) GE Service Bulletin 1410KID–28–468,
Revision 1, dated July 15, 2008.
(viii) GE Service Bulletin 1420KID–28–469,
Revision 1, dated July 23, 2008.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on March 27, 2009 (74 FR
7792, February 20, 2009):
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28A6096, Revision 02, dated July 4,
2008.
(4) For Airbus service information
identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS—
EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33
5 61 93 44 51; email: account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com. For GE service information
identified in this AD, contact GE Aviation,
Customer Support Center, 1 Neumann Way,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45215; telephone 513–552–
3272; email cs.techpubs@ge.com; Internet
https://www.geaviation.com.
(5) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(6) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36149
material at an NARA facility, call 202–741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 31,
2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–14048 Filed 6–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 436
Disclosure Requirements and
Prohibitions Concerning Franchising
Federal Trade Commission
(FTC or Commission).
ACTION: Final rule amendments.
AGENCY:
The FTC announces revised
monetary thresholds for three
exemptions from the Franchise Rule.
FTC is required to adjust the size of the
monetary thresholds every fourth year
based upon the Consumer Price Index
for all urban consumers published by
the Department of Labor.
DATES: This final rule is effective July 1,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Craig Tregillus, Franchise Rule
Coordinator, Division of Marketing
Practices, FTC, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580,
(202) 326–2970, ctregillus@ftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FTC’s
Trade Regulation Rule entitled
‘‘Disclosure Requirements and
Prohibitions Concerning Franchising’’
(Franchise Rule or Rule) 1 provides three
exemptions based on a monetary
threshold: the $500 ‘‘minimum payment
exemption,’’ 2 the $1 million ‘‘large
franchise investment exemption’’ 3 and
the $5 million ‘‘large franchisee
exemption.’’ 4 The Rule requires the
Commission to ‘‘adjust the size of the
monetary thresholds every fourth year
based upon the * * * Consumer Price
Index for all urban consumers published
by the Department of Labor.’’ 5 This
requirement, added by the 2007
amendments to the Rule, took effect on
July 1, 2007, so that franchisors would
have a one-year phase-in period within
which to comply with the amended
Rule’s revised disclosure requirements
SUMMARY:
1 16
CFR Part 436.
CFR 436.8(a)(1).
3 16 CFR 436.8(a)(5)(i).
4 16 CFR 436.8(a)(5)(ii).
5 16 CFR 436.8(b).
2 16
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36146-36149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14048]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1170; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-264-AD;
Amendment 39-17080; AD 2012-12-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Airbus Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R and A300 F4-600R series
airplanes, Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes, and Model A310
series airplanes. That AD currently requires modifying the wiring in
the right-hand electronics rack. This new AD requires replacing the
cockpit multi-tank indicators (MTI), and for certain airplanes,
replacing high-level, low-level, and overflow sensors and their harness
connectors, and re-instating the low-level warning indication to the
cockpit MTI. This AD was prompted by reports of failures of four fuel
level sensor-amplifier and MTI units. This AD also adds Model A310
series airplanes to the applicability. We are issuing this AD to
prevent degradation of the electrical insulation sleeves of the low-
level indication lamps on the MTI, which could cause a short circuit
that might result in high voltage being conveyed to the high- and low-
level sensors in the wing tanks. This condition could cause the level
sensor to heat above acceptable limits, possibly resulting in a fuel
tank explosion, and consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July 23, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 23,
2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of March
27, 2009 (74 FR 7792, February 20, 2009).
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 7, 2011 (76
FR 68671), and proposed to supersede AD 2009-02-04, Amendment 39-15794
(74 FR 7792, February 20, 2009). That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
One operator experienced failures of four Fuel Level Sensor-
Amplifier (FLSA) and Multi Tank Indicators (MTI) units. FLSA and MTI
failures have been identified as having been caused by incorrect
connector sleeves materials fitted to the MTI units.
Degradation of the electrical insulation sleeves of the Low-
level indication lamps on the MTI of the flight deck can cause a
short circuit that might result in high voltage being conveyed to
the high and low level sensors in the wing tanks. This condition, if
not corrected, could cause the level sensor to heat above acceptable
limits, possibly resulting in fuel tank explosion, and consequent
loss of the aeroplane.
As an interim action, EASA AD 2008-0055 [which corresponds to
FAA AD 2009-02-04, Amendment 39-15794 (74 FR 7792, February 20,
2009)], was issued requiring the accomplishment of wiring
modifications to protect the FLSA and the Flight Warning Computers
from 115V [volt] AC [alternating current] and 28V DC [direct
current] short circuits within the cockpit MTI.
EASA AD 2009-0144, which required the replacement of the
affected sensors and their harness connectors with modified units in
accordance with the instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin (SB)
A300-28-6095 at original issue or SB A300-28-9013 at original issue,
as applicable, was further on cancelled because the installation of
the new inner tank fused low-level sensors was not possible, due to
interference between some sensors and a fuel pipe at connector
level.
Airbus SB A300-28-6095 and SB A300-28-9013 have been revised to
clear this interference. The replacement of the affected sensors and
their harness connectors according to the instructions of these SBs
is now possible.
This [EASA] AD supersedes [EASA] AD 2008-0055 and introduces the
following actions:
--Expanding of the applicability to A310 aeroplanes; and
--Replacement of the cockpit MTI with a MTI with silicone sleeves
and to reinstate the low level warning indication to the cockpit
MTI; and
--Replacement of the affected sensors and their harness connectors
by fused level sensor units for A300-600 and A300-600ST aeroplanes.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comments received.
Requests for Extension of Compliance Time
UPS requested that we extend the compliance time specified in
paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) in the NPRM (76 FR 68671, November 7,
2011) to 60 months. UPS explained that the requested extended
compliance time is to reduce the potential for special maintenance
visits of its airplanes, and that a compliance period of less than 60
months will cause undue hardship on UPS and its operation, and result
in significant negative economic impact.
[[Page 36147]]
UPS reasoned that it has an existing tank entry program that is
completed only during airplane major maintenance visits at a 5-year
time interval, and that using the existing interval will reduce the
costs to open, purge, close, and check out the tanks. UPS explained
further, that materials will take a minimum of 6 months to receive, and
due to the extensive time waiting for parts, this will force even more
airplanes into a special visit program in a much shorter period of time
than what the NPRM is proposing.
UPS expressed that it agrees with the FAA when the premise for
establishing a timeline for completion of an SFAR (Special Federal
Aviation Regulation) 88 project is based on a level of safety as
determined by the NPRM (76 FR 68671, November 7, 2011) and that it
believes there is a timeframe precedence that has previously been set
by the FAA for a project of this type. UPS explained that the FAA
released an earlier AD, which corrected similar actions to the NPRM (76
FR 68671, November 7, 2011), and that the earlier AD had a 5-year
compliance requirement. UPS believes that the same level of safety is
achieved with a 5-year compliance on the Model A300 airplanes fleet.
FedEx requested that we extend the compliance time in the NPRM (76
FR 68671, November 7, 2011) to 30 months, to allow for the
accomplishment of the work to be performed at a scheduled heavy
maintenance event. FedEx explained that it accomplishes a heavy
maintenance check on its Model A300-600 and A310 airplanes every 30
months. FedEx reasoned that it would be 22 hours per airplane to
accomplish the requirements of the service information and that it is a
significant economic and operational hardship for it to ``special
visit'' airplanes to accomplish fuel tank entry.
We do not agree to extend the compliance time in this final rule.
In developing an appropriate compliance time for this action, we
considered the urgency associated with the subject unsafe condition,
the availability of required parts, and the practical aspect of
accomplishing the required modification within a period of time that
corresponds to the normal scheduled maintenance for most affected
operators. Under the provisions of paragraph (m) of the final rule, we
will consider requests for approval of an extension of the compliance
time if sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that the new
compliance time would provide an acceptable level of safety. We have
not changed the AD in this regard.
Requests for Revision to Costs of Compliance
UPS requested that we revise the Costs of Compliance section in the
NPRM (76 FR 68671, November 7, 2011). UPS explained that it has
determined that the required hours to complete the NPRM are greater
than 150 hours and that the material kits that are required by Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6095, Revision 01, dated February 2,
2010, are approximately $40,000 each, which is a total of $52,750 per
airplane. UPS reasoned that the completion of the modification on the
53 UPS Model A300 airplanes will be approximately $2,795,750, which is
a significant negative economic impact on UPS. UPS expressed that the
proposed cost in the NPRM is only 7.5 percent of the actual cost that
UPS will incur and that the actual costs will be greater than 13 times
the cost estimates proposed in the NPRM.
FedEx requested that we acknowledge that there is an additional
material cost and that our Costs of Compliance section in the NPRM (76
FR 68671, November 7, 2011) is underestimated in terms of financial
impact to the operator. FedEx reasoned that the estimated parts cost
for accomplishment of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6095,
Revision 01, dated February 2, 2010, only includes the Airbus
manufactured hardware kit (P/N 286095B01R01). FedEx explained that in
order to complete the modification, a separate Intertechnique kit that
includes the actual sensors and harness connectors must be procured,
and that Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6095, Revision 01,
dated February 2, 2010, provides no warranty information or pricing for
the additional required kit. FedEx expressed that it is in the process
of obtaining price information for the additional required
Intertechnique kits and will provide the data when it becomes
available.
We agree to revise the Costs of Compliance section in this final
rule for the reasons stated by the commenters. We have revised the
Costs of Compliance section of the final rule to include the average
costs of parts from Intertechnique.
Revised Paragraph Header and Wording
We have revised the heading for and the wording in paragraph (k) of
this AD and the wording of paragraph (g) of this AD; these changes have
not affected the intent of those paragraphs.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously--except for minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (76 FR 68671, November 7, 2011) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 68671, November 7, 2011).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 210 products of U.S.
registry. The actions that are required by AD 2009-02-04, Amendment 39-
15794 (74 FR 7792, February 20, 2009), and retained in this AD take
about 5 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per
work-hour. Required parts cost about $0 per product. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the currently required actions is $425
per product.
We estimate that it will take about 44 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $39,000 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $8,975,400, or $42,740 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority
[[Page 36148]]
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (76 FR 68671, November 7,
2011), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2009-02-04, Amendment 39-15794 (74 FR 7792, February 20, 2009), and
adding the following new AD:
2012-12-01 Airbus: Amendment 39-17080. Docket No. FAA-2011-1170;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-264-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective July 23,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2009-02-04, Amendment 39-15794 (74 FR
7792, February 20, 2009).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-
622, B4-605R, B4-622R, F4-605R, F4-622R, and C4-605R Variant F
airplanes, and Model A310-203, -204, -221, -222, -304, -322, -324,
and -325 airplanes; certificated in any category; all certified
models, all manufacturer serial numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of failures of four fuel level
sensor-amplifier and multi-tank indicator (MTI) units. We are
issuing this AD to prevent degradation of the electrical insulation
sleeves of the low-level indication lamps on the MTI, which could
cause a short circuit that might result in high voltage being
conveyed to the high and low level sensors in the wing tanks. This
condition could cause the level sensor to heat above acceptable
limits, possibly resulting in a fuel tank explosion, and consequent
loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Retained Actions and Compliance Times
(1) This paragraph restates the actions and compliance times
required by paragraph (f) of AD 2009-02-04, Amendment 39-15794 (74
FR 7792, February 20, 2009), with no changes. For Model A300-600
airplanes: Unless already done, within 3 months after March 27, 2009
(the effective date of AD 2009-02-04), modify the wiring in the
right-hand electronics rack in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28A6096,
Revision 02, dated July 4, 2008. Doing the required actions in
paragraph (h) or (i) of this AD, as applicable, terminates the
actions required by this paragraph.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for the modification required
by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if the modification was performed
before March 27, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-02-04) using
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28A6096, dated October 19,
2007; or Revision 01, dated April 16, 2008.
(h) New Replacement and Re-Instatement for Certain Model A300-600
Series Airplanes With New Service Information
For Model A300-600 series airplanes on which Airbus modification
06213 has been embodied in production: Within 24 months after the
effective date of this AD, do the actions required by paragraphs
(h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3) of this AD. Doing the actions in this
paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD.
(1) Replace the cockpit MTI, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300-28-6101, dated June 4, 2008.
(2) Before further flight after doing the replacement specified
in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD: Replace the high-level, low-level,
and overflow sensors and their harness connectors, with fused
sensors and new harness connectors, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300-28-6095, Revision 01, dated February 2, 2010.
(3) Before further flight after doing the replacement specified
in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD: Re-instate the low-level warning
indication to the cockpit MTI, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6103,
Revision 01, dated May 18, 2010.
(i) New Replacement and Re-Instatement for Certain Other Model A300-600
Series Airplanes
For Model A300-600 series airplanes on which Airbus modification
06213 has not been embodied in production: Within 24 months after
the effective date of this AD, do the actions required by paragraphs
(i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD. Doing the actions in this
paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD.
(1) Replace the cockpit MTI, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300-28-6101, dated June 4, 2008.
(2) Before further flight after doing the replacement specified
in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD: Re-instate the low-level warning
indication to the cockpit MTI, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6103,
Revision 01, dated May 18, 2010.
(3) Before further flight after doing the action specified in
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD: Replace the high-level, low-level, and
overflow sensors and their harness connectors, with fused sensors
and new harness connectors, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6095,
Revision 01, dated February 2, 2010.
(j) New Replacement for Model A310 Series Airplanes
For Model A310 series airplanes: Within 24 months after the
effective date of this AD, replace the cockpit MTI, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A310-28-2167, dated June 4, 2008.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraphs (h)(3) and
[[Page 36149]]
(i)(2) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300-28-6103, dated May 20, 2009.
(l) Parts Installation
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install, on
any airplane, any MTI in the cockpit location, unless it has been
modified in accordance with the applicable service information
listed in paragraphs (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), (l)(4), (l)(5), and
(l)(6) of this AD.
(1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6101, dated June
4, 2008.
(2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A310-28-2167, dated June
4, 2008.
(3) GE Service Bulletin 1404KID-28-466, Revision 1, dated July
15, 2008.
(4) GE Service Bulletin 1406KID-28-467, Revision 1, dated July
15, 2008.
(5) GE Service Bulletin 1410KID-28-468, Revision 1, dated July
15, 2008.
(6) GE Service Bulletin 1420KID-28-469, Revision 1, dated July
23, 2008.
(m) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(n) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2010-0175, dated August 18, 2010, and the service
information identified in paragraphs (n)(1), (n)(2), (n)(3), (n)(4),
(n)(5), (n)(6), (n)(7), (n)(8), and (n)(9) of this AD, for related
information.
(1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6095, Revision 01,
dated February 2, 2010.
(2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6101, dated June
4, 2008.
(3) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6103, Revision 01,
dated May 18, 2010.
(4) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28A6096, Revision 02,
dated July 4, 2008.
(5) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A310-28-2167, dated June
4, 2008.
(6) GE Service Bulletin 1404KID-28-466, Revision 1, dated July
15, 2008.
(7) GE Service Bulletin 1406KID-28-467, Revision 1, dated July
15, 2008.
(8) GE Service Bulletin 1410KID-28-468, Revision 1, dated July
15, 2008.
(9) GE Service Bulletin 1420KID-28-469, Revision 1, dated July
23, 2008.
(o) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) of the following service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 on the date specified.
(2) The following service information was approved for IBR on
July 23, 2012:
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6095, Revision 01,
dated February 2, 2010.
(ii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6101, dated June
4, 2008.
(iii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6103, Revision
01, dated May 18, 2010.
(iv) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A310-28-2167, dated June
4, 2008.
(v) GE Service Bulletin 1404KID-28-466, Revision 1, dated July
15, 2008.
(vi) GE Service Bulletin 1406KID-28-467, Revision 1, dated July
15, 2008.
(vii) GE Service Bulletin 1410KID-28-468, Revision 1, dated July
15, 2008.
(viii) GE Service Bulletin 1420KID-28-469, Revision 1, dated
July 23, 2008.
(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
March 27, 2009 (74 FR 7792, February 20, 2009):
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28A6096, Revision 02,
dated July 4, 2008.
(4) For Airbus service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus SAS--EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email: account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. For GE service information
identified in this AD, contact GE Aviation, Customer Support Center,
1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, Ohio 45215; telephone 513-552-3272; email
cs.techpubs@ge.com; Internet https://www.geaviation.com.
(5) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(6) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call 202-741-6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 31, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-14048 Filed 6-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P