Safety Zones; Multiple Firework Displays in Captain of the Port, Puget Sound Zone, 35852-35854 [2012-14709]
Download as PDF
35852
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:55 Jun 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of an emergency safety
zone. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and Recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add § 165.T13–220 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–220 Safety Zone; F/V Deep Sea,
Penn Cove, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is
designated as a safety zone: All waters
encompassing 200 yards of the Fishing
Vessel Deep Sea located at
approximately 48°13′18″ N, 122°47′42″
W, Penn Cove, WA.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR 165,
Subpart C, vessels wishing to enter the
zone must request permission for entry
by contacting the Joint Harbor Operation
Center at (206) 217–6001 or the onscene patrol craft on VHF CH 13. Once
permission for entry is granted vessels
must proceed at a minimum speed
necessary for safe navigation.
(c) Enforcement period. This rule will
be effective from 12 a.m. on May 19,
2012 until 11:59 p.m. on June 15, 2012
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
unless cancelled sooner by the Captain
of the Port.
Dated: May 18, 2012.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2012–14640 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0488]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Multiple Firework
Displays in Captain of the Port, Puget
Sound Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing safety zones in Boston
Harbor, Holmes Harbor, Port Gardner
and Port Townsend for various summer
fireworks displays. The safety zones are
necessary to help ensure the safety of
the maritime public during the displays
and will do so by prohibiting all persons
and vessels from entering the safety
zones unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 5 p.m.
on July 3, 2012, until 1 a.m. on July 5,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2012–0488. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email ENS Anthony P. LaBoy, Coast
Guard Sector Puget Sound, Waterways
Management Division; telephone 206–
217–6323, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Townsend near Point Hudson. All
persons and vessels will be prohibited
from entering the safety zones during
the dates and times they are effective
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his Designated Representative.
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Given the short
time until the fireworks displays
commence, it would be impracticable to
issue an NPRM and subsequent final
rule before the commencement of the
fireworks displays. For that reason, we
find there is good cause to issue this
final rule without notice and comment.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because to do so would be
impracticable, since the events would
be over before notice could be given and
comments taken, and it is immediately
necessary to protect the events’
spectators from the hazards associated
with fireworks displays.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Basis and Purpose
(a) The authority for this action can be
found in 33 CFR 1.05–1(f).
(b) Fireworks displays create
hazardous conditions for the maritime
public because of the large number of
vessels that congregate near the displays
as well as the noise, falling debris, and
explosions that occur during the event.
The establishment of a safety zone
around displays helps to ensure the
safety of the maritime public by
prohibiting all persons and vessels from
coming too close to the fireworks
display and the associated hazards.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
This rule establishes four safety zones
for the following firework displays:
Boston Harbor Fireworks on July 3, 2012
in Boston Harbor near Olympia, WA;
Celebrate America Festival on July 3,
2012 in Holmes Harbor near Freeland,
WA; Everett 4th of July Foundation on
July 4, 2012 in Port Gardner near
Everett, WA; and Port Townsend July
4th Fireworks on July 4, 2012 in Port
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This rule is not a significant
regulatory action because it creates
safety zones that are minimal in size
and short in duration.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will
affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: The
owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit through the established safety
zones during the times of enforcement.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the
temporary safety zones are minimal in
size and short in duration, maritime
traffic will be able to transit around
them and may be permitted to transit
them with permission from the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35853
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
35854
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of safety zones. This rule
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–220 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–220 Safety Zones; Multiple
Firework Displays in Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound Zone
(a) Location. The following areas are
designated as safety zones:
(1) Boston Harbor Fireworks, Boston
Harbor, Olympia, WA: All waters of
Boston Harbor encompassed within a
100 yard radius around position
47°08.626′ N, 122°54.149′ W.
(2) Celebrate America Festival,
Holmes Harbor, Freeland, WA: All
waters of Holmes Harbor encompassed
within a 200 yard radius around
position 48°01.048′ N, 122°31.866′ W.
(3) Everett Fourth of July Foundation,
Port Gardner, Everett, WA: All waters of
Port Gardner encompassed within a 300
yard radius around position 48°00.672′
N, 122°13.391′ W.
(4) Port Townsend July 4th Fireworks,
Point Hudson, Port Townsend, WA: All
waters of Port Townsend encompassed
within a 150 yard radius around
position 48°06.900′ N, 122°45.120′ W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the safety zone
created by this section without the
permission of the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
Designated representatives are Coast
Guard Personnel authorized by the
Captain of the Port to grant persons or
vessels permission to enter or remain in
the safety zone created by this section.
See 33 CFR part 165, Subpart C, for
additional information and
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(c) Enforcement Period. The safety
zones created by this section will be
enforced as follows:
(1) Boston Harbor Fireworks, Boston
Harbor, Olympia, WA: 5 p.m. on July 3,
2012 until 1 a.m. on July 4, 2012.
(2) Celebrate America Festival,
Holmes Harbor, Freeland, WA: 5 p.m.
on July 3, 2012 until 1 a.m. on July 4,
2012.
(3) Everett Fourth of July Foundation,
Port Gardner, Everett, WA: 5 p.m. July
4, 2012 until 1 a.m. on July 5, 2012.
(4) Port Townsend July 4th Fireworks,
Point Hudson, Port Townsend, WA: 5
p.m. on July 4, 2012 until 1 a.m. on July
5, 2012.
Dated: June 1, 2012.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2012–14709 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0228]
Safety Zone, Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan Including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, and
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel,
Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a segment of the Safety Zone; Brandon
Road Lock and Dam to Lake Michigan
including Des Plaines River, Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago River,
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel on all
waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal from Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile
Marker 296.7 at various times from July
19, 2012 until July 27, 2012. This action
is necessary to protect the waterways,
waterway users, and vessels from
hazards associated with the Army Corps
of Engineers’ safety testing of the
demonstration barrier and barriers IIA
and IIB.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.930 will be enforced from 7 a.m. to
11 a.m. and from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. on
July 19, 2012, through July 27, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or email CWO Jon Grob, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35852-35854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14709]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0488]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; Multiple Firework Displays in Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound Zone
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing safety zones in Boston Harbor,
Holmes Harbor, Port Gardner and Port Townsend for various summer
fireworks displays. The safety zones are necessary to help ensure the
safety of the maritime public during the displays and will do so by
prohibiting all persons and vessels from entering the safety zones
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m. on July 3, 2012, until 1 a.m.
on July 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2012-0488. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email ENS Anthony P. LaBoy, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound,
Waterways Management Division; telephone 206-217-6323, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
[[Page 35853]]
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Given the short time until the fireworks displays commence,
it would be impracticable to issue an NPRM and subsequent final rule
before the commencement of the fireworks displays. For that reason, we
find there is good cause to issue this final rule without notice and
comment.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule because to do so would be impracticable, since the
events would be over before notice could be given and comments taken,
and it is immediately necessary to protect the events' spectators from
the hazards associated with fireworks displays.
B. Basis and Purpose
(a) The authority for this action can be found in 33 CFR 1.05-1(f).
(b) Fireworks displays create hazardous conditions for the maritime
public because of the large number of vessels that congregate near the
displays as well as the noise, falling debris, and explosions that
occur during the event. The establishment of a safety zone around
displays helps to ensure the safety of the maritime public by
prohibiting all persons and vessels from coming too close to the
fireworks display and the associated hazards.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
This rule establishes four safety zones for the following firework
displays: Boston Harbor Fireworks on July 3, 2012 in Boston Harbor near
Olympia, WA; Celebrate America Festival on July 3, 2012 in Holmes
Harbor near Freeland, WA; Everett 4th of July Foundation on July 4,
2012 in Port Gardner near Everett, WA; and Port Townsend July 4th
Fireworks on July 4, 2012 in Port Townsend near Point Hudson. All
persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering the safety zones
during the dates and times they are effective unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his Designated Representative.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This rule is not a
significant regulatory action because it creates safety zones that are
minimal in size and short in duration.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
through the established safety zones during the times of enforcement.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the temporary safety zones are minimal
in size and short in duration, maritime traffic will be able to transit
around them and may be permitted to transit them with permission from
the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
[[Page 35854]]
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of safety zones. This
rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-220 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-220 Safety Zones; Multiple Firework Displays in Captain
of the Port, Puget Sound Zone
(a) Location. The following areas are designated as safety zones:
(1) Boston Harbor Fireworks, Boston Harbor, Olympia, WA: All waters
of Boston Harbor encompassed within a 100 yard radius around position
47[deg]08.626' N, 122[deg]54.149' W.
(2) Celebrate America Festival, Holmes Harbor, Freeland, WA: All
waters of Holmes Harbor encompassed within a 200 yard radius around
position 48[deg]01.048' N, 122[deg]31.866' W.
(3) Everett Fourth of July Foundation, Port Gardner, Everett, WA:
All waters of Port Gardner encompassed within a 300 yard radius around
position 48[deg]00.672' N, 122[deg]13.391' W.
(4) Port Townsend July 4th Fireworks, Point Hudson, Port Townsend,
WA: All waters of Port Townsend encompassed within a 150 yard radius
around position 48[deg]06.900' N, 122[deg]45.120' W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR part 165, subpart C, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
safety zone created by this section without the permission of the
Captain of the Port or his designated representative. Designated
representatives are Coast Guard Personnel authorized by the Captain of
the Port to grant persons or vessels permission to enter or remain in
the safety zone created by this section. See 33 CFR part 165, Subpart
C, for additional information and requirements.
(c) Enforcement Period. The safety zones created by this section
will be enforced as follows:
(1) Boston Harbor Fireworks, Boston Harbor, Olympia, WA: 5 p.m. on
July 3, 2012 until 1 a.m. on July 4, 2012.
(2) Celebrate America Festival, Holmes Harbor, Freeland, WA: 5 p.m.
on July 3, 2012 until 1 a.m. on July 4, 2012.
(3) Everett Fourth of July Foundation, Port Gardner, Everett, WA: 5
p.m. July 4, 2012 until 1 a.m. on July 5, 2012.
(4) Port Townsend July 4th Fireworks, Point Hudson, Port Townsend,
WA: 5 p.m. on July 4, 2012 until 1 a.m. on July 5, 2012.
Dated: June 1, 2012.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2012-14709 Filed 6-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P