Johnson & Johnson and Synthes, Inc.; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Orders to Aid Public Comment, 35978-35981 [2012-14660]

Download as PDF 35978 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Notices Tongass Federal Credit Union ............................................................................. Hawaii Federal Credit Union ................................................................................ HawaiiUSA Federal Credit Union ......................................................................... East Idaho Credit Union ....................................................................................... Valley Bank of Kalispell ........................................................................................ West One Bank .................................................................................................... First Montana Bank .............................................................................................. Missoula Federal Credit Union ............................................................................. Willamette Community Bank ................................................................................ First Technology Federal Credit Union ................................................................ Bank of the Cascades .......................................................................................... First Community Credit Union .............................................................................. Siuslaw Bank ........................................................................................................ Oregon Coast Bank .............................................................................................. Capital Pacific Bank ............................................................................................. Pacific NW Federal Credit Union ......................................................................... Umpqua Bank ....................................................................................................... Marion and Polk Schools Credit Union ................................................................ Clackamas County Bank ...................................................................................... Republic Bank, Inc ............................................................................................... Bank of Utah ........................................................................................................ Goldenwest Credit Union ..................................................................................... BMW Bank of North America ............................................................................... Capmark Bank ...................................................................................................... Celtic Bank Corporation ....................................................................................... Deseret First Credit Union ................................................................................... Wright Express Financial Service Corporation .................................................... Heritage Bank ....................................................................................................... Eastside Commercial Bank, National Association ............................................... Industrial Credit Union of Whatcom County ........................................................ North Coast Credit Union ..................................................................................... Lacamas Community Credit Union ...................................................................... Cashmere Valley Bank ......................................................................................... NorthWest Plus Credit Union ............................................................................... Community First Bank .......................................................................................... Pacific International Bank ..................................................................................... Regal Financial Bank ........................................................................................... Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union ........................................................................ Verity Credit Union ............................................................................................... AmericanWest Bank ............................................................................................. Global Credit Union .............................................................................................. Horizon Credit Union ............................................................................................ Yakima National Bank .......................................................................................... Cheyenne State Bank .......................................................................................... First Federal Savings Bank .................................................................................. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES II. Public Comments To encourage the submission of public comments on the community support performance of Bank members, on or before June 29, 2012, each Bank will notify its Advisory Council and nonprofit housing developers, community groups, and other interested parties in its district of the members selected for community support review in the 2010 sixth round review cycle. 12 CFR 1290.2(b)(2)(ii). In reviewing a member for community support compliance, FHFA will consider any public comments it has received concerning the member. 12 CFR 1290.2(d). To ensure consideration by FHFA, comments concerning the community support performance of members selected for the 2010 sixth round review cycle must be delivered to FHFA, either by hard-copy mail at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Ninth Floor, Housing Mission and Goals (DHMG), 400 Seventh Street SW., VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:05 Jun 14, 2012 Jkt 226001 Ketchikan .............................................. Honolulu ................................................ Honolulu ................................................ Idaho Falls ............................................ Kalispell ................................................. Kalispell ................................................. Libby ..................................................... Missoula ................................................ Albany ................................................... Beaverton .............................................. Bend ...................................................... Coquille ................................................. Florence ................................................ Newport ................................................. Portland ................................................. Portland ................................................. Roseburg .............................................. Salem .................................................... Sandy .................................................... Bountiful ................................................ Ogden ................................................... Ogden ................................................... Salt Lake City ....................................... Salt Lake City ....................................... Salt Lake City ....................................... Salt Lake City ....................................... Salt Lake City ....................................... Saint George ......................................... Bellevue ................................................ Bellingham ............................................ Bellingham ............................................ Camas ................................................... Cashmere ............................................. Everett ................................................... Kennewick ............................................. Seattle ................................................... Seattle ................................................... Seattle ................................................... Seattle ................................................... Spokane ................................................ Spokane ................................................ Spokane ................................................ Yakima .................................................. Cheyenne .............................................. Sheridan ................................................ Washington, DC 20024, or by electronic mail to hmgcommunitysupport program@fhfa.gov on or before the July 30, 2012 deadline for submission of Community Support Statements. Dated: June 8, 2012. Edward J. DeMarco, Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency. [FR Doc. 2012–14590 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8070–01–P FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION [File No. 111 0160] Johnson & Johnson and Synthes, Inc.; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Orders to Aid Public Comment Federal Trade Commission. Proposed consent agreement. AGENCY: ACTION: PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Alaska. Hawaii. Hawaii. Idaho. Montana. Montana. Montana. Montana. Oregon. Oregon. Oregon. Oregon. Oregon. Oregon. Oregon. Oregon. Oregon. Oregon. Oregon. Utah. Utah. Utah. Utah. Utah. Utah. Utah. Utah. Utah. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Washington. Wyoming. Wyoming. The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint and the terms of the consent order—embodied in the consent agreement—that would settle these allegations. DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 12, 2012. ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper, by following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ‘‘Johnson & Johnson, File No. 111 0160’’ on your comment, and file your comment online at https:// ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ j&jsynthesconsent, by following the instructions on the Web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment on SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM 15JNN1 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Notices paper, mail or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H–113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark D. Seidman (202–326–3296), FTC, Bureau of Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and § 2.34 the Commission Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page (for June 11, 2012), on the World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/ os/actions.shtm. A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public Reference Room, Room 130–H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326– 2222. You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to consider your comment, we must receive it on or before July 12, 2012. Write ‘‘Johnson & Johnson, File No. 111 0160’’ on your comment. Your comment—including your name and your state—will be placed on the public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable, on the public Commission Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/ publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of discretion, the Commission tries to remove individuals’ home contact information from comments before placing them on the Commission Web site. Because your comment will be made public, you are solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive personal information, like anyone’s Social Security number, date of birth, driver’s license number or other state identification number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive health information, like medical records or VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:05 Jun 14, 2012 Jkt 226001 other individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not include any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information which is obtained from any person and which is privileged or confidential,’’ as provided in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names. If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).1 Your comment will be kept confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the public interest. Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your online comment, you must file it at https:// ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ j&jsynthesconsent by following the instructions on the web-based form. If this Notice appears at https:// www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also may file a comment through that Web site. If you file your comment on paper, write ‘‘Jonhson & Johnson, File No. 111 0160’’ on your comment and on the envelope, and mail or deliver it to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H–113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580. If possible, submit your paper comment to the Commission by courier or overnight service. Visit the Commission Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws that the Commission administers permit the collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that it receives on or before July 12, 2012. You can find more information, including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in the 1 In particular, the written request for confidential treatment that accompanies the comment must include the factual and legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35979 Commission’s privacy policy, at https:// www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm. Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order to Aid Public Comment I. Introduction The Federal Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has accepted, subject to final approval, an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (‘‘Consent Agreement’’) from Johnson & Johnson (‘‘J&J’’). The purpose of the proposed Consent Agreement is to remedy the anticompetitive effects that would otherwise result from J&J’s acquisition of the volar distal radius plating system assets of Synthes, Inc. (‘‘Synthes’’). Under the terms of the proposed Consent Agreement, J&J is required to divest all assets (including intellectual property) related to its ‘‘DVR’’ volar distal radius plating system business to a third party, enabling that third party to make and sell the DVR for the treatment of distal radius wrist fractures. The proposed Consent Agreement has been placed on the public record for thirty days to solicit comments from interested persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. After thirty days, the Commission will again review the proposed Consent Agreement and the comments received, and will decide whether it should withdraw from the proposed Consent Agreement or make it final. Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 26, 2011, J&J proposes to acquire Synthes in exchange for cash and voting securities in a transaction valued at approximately $21.3 billion. The Commission’s complaint alleges that the proposed acquisition, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 45, by combining the two largest competitors in the U.S. market for volar distal radius plating systems. The proposed Consent Agreement would remedy the alleged violations by replacing the competition that otherwise would be lost in these markets as a result of the acquisition. II. The Parties J&J is a comprehensive and broadbased manufacturer of products related to all aspects of human health care. In 2011, J&J generated global sales of $65 billion and U.S. sales of $28.9 billion. J&J is divided into three business segments: Consumer, Pharmaceutical, and Medical Devices and Diagnostics. The products impacted by the proposed E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM 15JNN1 35980 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Notices srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES transaction, volar distal radius plating systems, fall within J&J’s Medical Devices and Diagnostics segment. Synthes is a medical device company that manufactures products in five main product groups: trauma, spine, craniomaxillofacial, biomaterials, and power tools. In 2011, Synthes generated global sales of $3.97 billion worldwide and U.S. sales of $2.14 billion. Synthes’s volar distal radius plating system sales are part of its trauma unit. III. Volar Distal Radius Plating Systems Volar distal radius plates are internal fixation devices that are implanted surgically from the underside of the wrist to achieve and maintain proper alignment of the radius bone following a fracture. Distal radius fractures, which are fractures of the portion of the radius bone closest to the wrist, are among the most common fractures in the human body. Distal radius fractures generally occur as a result of an individual bracing for a fall, whether it is a routine slip and fall by an elderly patient with a weak bone structure or a high-energy fall by a young, active patient engaged in sporting activities. Most patients who experience distal radius fractures do not require surgical intervention and can be treated with simple casting. If the radius bone is displaced, however, it is almost always necessary to realign the fracture surgically. Volar distal radius plating systems are the primary option for treating displaced distal radius fractures in the United States. They are favored by surgeons because they provide solid fracture alignment, are easy to implant, and enable greater patient post-surgical freedom of movement and shorter patient recovery times. Other options exist to treat displaced distal radius fractures, but those alternative methods are typically used only in specialized cases. For the large percentage of displaced distal radius fractures, the clinical benefits of volar distal radius plating systems cannot be matched by the alternative products available on the market, and doctors and their patients would not switch to using products other than volar distal radius plating systems in response to a small but significant increase in the price of these systems. The U.S. market for volar distal radius plating systems is highly concentrated, with J&J and Synthes controlling over 70 percent of the market as measured by 2010 revenue. The design of the DVR incorporates unique, clinically relevant features that are protected by intellectual property rights. Many surgeons still consider the DVR to be the best volar distal radius plating system VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:05 Jun 14, 2012 Jkt 226001 on the market, and it accounted for approximately 29 percent of U.S. volar distal radius sales in 2010. Synthes is the leading manufacturer of volar distal radius plating systems in the United States, and accounted for approximately 42 percent of the market by 2010 revenue. Synthes’s success selling distal radius plating systems derives in part from its leading position and strong clinical reputation in the overall trauma field. The next closest competitors to J&J and Synthes—Stryker and Acumed— would each be less than one-sixth the size of the combined firm. The relevant geographic market for volar distal radius plating systems is the United States. Volar distal radius plating systems are medical devices that are regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration (‘‘FDA’’). Volar distal radius plating systems sold outside the United States, but not approved for sale in the United States, are not viable competitive alternatives for U.S. consumers and hence are not in the relevant market. IV. Competitive Effects and Entry Conditions The acquisition would cause significant competitive harm in the market for volar distal radius plating systems. J&J and Synthes are the leading suppliers of volar distal radius plating systems and each other’s most significant competitors. J&J and Synthes have responded directly to competition from each other with lower prices and improved products. Although there are a number of other suppliers of volar distal radius plates, they have not gained significant traction among surgeons and have substantially smaller market shares than the merging parties. By eliminating its closest competitor, the acquisition would allow J&J to unilaterally raise prices in the market for volar distal radius plating systems. Entry would not be timely, likely, or sufficient in magnitude, character, and scope to deter or counteract the anticompetitive effects of the acquisition. Both J&J and Synthes employ patented technology in their volar distal radius plating systems. The patents owned by the two companies have prevented competitors from developing products that surgeons consider to be equally effective. Manufacturer product reputation and effective distribution also are important to surgeons and hospitals. Many fringe competitors are limited by their lack of a strong distribution system, and it would take a significant amount of time for one or more current fringe competitors to develop a sufficient reputation for quality, service, and PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 consistency. Therefore, timely and sufficient entry in response to a small but significant price increase is unlikely. V. The Proposed Consent Agreement The proposed Decision and Order resolves the competitive concerns raised by J&J’s proposed acquisition of Synthes by requiring the divestiture of J&J’s U.S. DVR assets to a qualified buyer no later than ten (10) days after the acquisition is consummated. The parties have selected Biomet, Inc. (‘‘Biomet’’) as the buyer for the assets to be divested. Although the Commission’s competitive concerns are limited to the manufacture and sale of volar distal radius plating systems, the parties elected to divest the entire J&J trauma portfolio, including the volar distal radius plating systems, to Biomet. Biomet is a successful orthopedics company with a recognized brand name, an extensive nationwide sales force, and existing service relationships with surgeons and hospitals, but it currently has no meaningful presence in the volar distal radius plating or trauma product markets. Biomet is thus well positioned to replace the competition that will be eliminated as a result of the proposed transaction. A divestiture of J&J’s volar distal radius assets will ensure that Biomet has a recognized high-quality volar distal radius plating system offering, enabling it to compete immediately with the merged entity. The Commission’s merger remedies are intended to maintain or to restore the competitive status quo. Based on the evidence gathered in the investigation, the Commission has determined that the divestiture of J&J’s volar distal radius plating system assets to Biomet should replicate the competitive conditions for volar distal radius plating systems that existed prior to the proposed transaction between J&J and Synthes. The proposed Consent Agreement contains a provision that allows the Commission to appoint an interim monitor to oversee J&J’s compliance with all of its obligations and performance of its responsibilities pursuant to the Commission’s Decision and Order. The interim monitor is required to file periodic reports with the Commission to ensure that the Commission remains informed about the status of the divestitures, about the efforts being made to accomplish the divestitures, and about the provision of services and assistance during the transition period to ensure the success of the DVR divestiture. Finally, the proposed Consent Agreement contains provisions that allow the Commission to appoint a E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM 15JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Notices divestiture trustee if any or all of the above remedies are not accomplished within the time frames required by the Consent Agreement. The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the proposed Consent Agreement, and it is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of the proposed Decision and Order or to modify its terms in any way. By direction of the Commission. Donald S. Clark, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–14660 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6750–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Notice of Intent To Award Affordable Care Act (ACA) Funding, HM10–1001 Notice of Intent to award Affordable Care Act (ACA) funding to the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) to educate public health laboratories about the Environmental Public Tracking Network as a potential data tool for laboratories. This award was proposed in the grantee’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 NonCompeting Continuation applications under funding opportunity Cooperative Agreement HM10–1001, ‘‘APHL–CDC Partnership for Quality Laboratory Practice.’’ AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice. This notice provides public announcement of CDC’s intent to award Affordable Care Act (ACA) appropriations to the Association of Public Health Laboratories. These activities are proposed by the abovementioned grantee in their FY 2012 applications submitted under funding opportunity HM10–1001, ‘‘APHL–CDC Partnership for Quality Laboratory Practice,’’ Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Number (CFDA): 93.065. Approximately $20,076 in ACA funding will be awarded to the grantee for communication and education activities designed to raise awareness among public health laboratories about the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. Funding is appropriated under the Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111–148), Section 4002 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:05 Jun 14, 2012 Jkt 226001 [42 U.S.C. 300u–11]; (Prevention and Public Health Fund). Accordingly, CDC adds the following information to the previously published funding opportunity announcement of HM10–1001: —Authority: Section 317(k)(2) of the Public Health Service Act, [42 U.S.C. 247b(k)(2)], as amended, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), Section 4002 [42 U.S.C. 300u–11]. —CFDA #: 93.538 Affordable Care Act—National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program-Network Implementation. Award Information: Type of Award: Non-Competing Continuation Cooperative Agreement. Approximate Total Current Fiscal Year ACA Funding: $20,076. Anticipated Number of Awards: 1. Fiscal Year Funds: 2012. Anticipated Award Date: July 2, 2012. Application Selection Process: Funding will be awarded to applicant based on results from the technical review recommendation. Funding Authority: CDC will add the ACA Authority to that which is reflected in the published Funding Opportunity CDC–RFA–HM10–1001. The revised funding authority language will read: —This program is authorized under Section 317(k)(2) of the Public Health Service Act, [42 U.S.C. 247b], as amended, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), Section 4002 [42 U.S.C. 300u–11]. DATES: The effective date for this action is the date of publication of this Notice and remains in effect until the expiration of the project period of the ACA funded applications. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annie Harrison-Camacho, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta, GA 30341, telephone (770) 488–2098, email Annie.HarrisonCamacho@cdc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 23, 2010, the President signed into law the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Public Law 111–148. The ACA is designed to improve and expand the scope of health care coverage for Americans. Cost savings through disease prevention is an important element of this legislation and the ACA has established a Prevention and Public Health Fund (PPHF) for this purpose. Specifically, the legislation states in Section 4002 that the PPHF is to ‘‘provide for expanded and sustained national investment in prevention and public health programs to improve health and PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35981 help restrain the rate of growth in private and public sector health care costs.’’ The ACA and the Prevention and Public Health Fund make improving public health a priority with investments to improve public health. The PPHF states that the Secretary shall transfer amounts in the Fund to accounts within the Department of Health and Human Services to increase funding, over the fiscal year 2008 level, for programs authorized by the Public Health Service Act, for prevention, wellness and public health activities including prevention research and health screenings, such as the Community Transformation Grant Program, the Education and Outreach Campaign for Preventative Benefits, and Immunization Programs. The ACA legislation affords an important opportunity to advance public health across the lifespan and to improve public health by supporting the Tracking Network. This network builds on ongoing efforts within the public health and environmental sectors to improve health tracking, hazard monitoring and response capacity. Therefore, increasing funding available to applicants under this FOA using the PPHF will allow them to expand and sustain their existing tracking networks, utilize tracking data available on networks for potential public health assessments which is consistent with the purpose of the PPHF, as stated above, and to provide for an expanded and sustained national investment in prevention and public health programs. Further, the Secretary allocated funds to CDC, pursuant to the PPHF, for the types of activities this FOA is designed to carry out. Dated: June 6, 2012. Alan A. Kotch, Director, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2012–14688 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [Document Identifier CMS–10028] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HHS. In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM 15JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35978-35981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14660]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[File No. 111 0160]


Johnson & Johnson and Synthes, Inc.; Analysis of Agreement 
Containing Consent Orders to Aid Public Comment

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged 
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or 
practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to 
Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft 
complaint and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent 
agreement--that would settle these allegations.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 12, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper, by 
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``Johnson & Johnson, 
File No. 111 0160'' on your comment, and file your comment online at 
https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/j&jsynthesconsent, by following 
the instructions on the Web-based form. If you prefer to file your 
comment on

[[Page 35979]]

paper, mail or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal 
Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D), 600 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark D. Seidman (202-326-3296), FTC, 
Bureau of Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20580.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 6(f) of the Federal 
Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and Sec.  2.34 the 
Commission Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given that 
the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to 
cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final 
approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a 
period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public 
Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the 
allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of 
the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page 
(for June 11, 2012), on the World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm. A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public 
Reference Room, Room 130-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-2222.
    You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to 
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before July 12, 2012. 
Write ``Johnson & Johnson, File No. 111 0160'' on your comment. Your 
comment--including your name and your state--will be placed on the 
public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable, 
on the public Commission Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of discretion, the Commission tries to 
remove individuals' home contact information from comments before 
placing them on the Commission Web site.
    Because your comment will be made public, you are solely 
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any 
sensitive personal information, like anyone's Social Security number, 
date of birth, driver's license number or other state identification 
number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial 
account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely 
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any 
sensitive health information, like medical records or other 
individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not 
include any ``[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information 
which is obtained from any person and which is privileged or 
confidential,'' as provided in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). In particular, do 
not include competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales 
statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing 
processes, or customer names.
    If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential 
treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for 
confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure explained 
in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).\1\ Your comment will be kept 
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole 
discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the 
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In particular, the written request for confidential 
treatment that accompanies the comment must include the factual and 
legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions 
of the comment to be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule 
4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to 
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit 
your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your 
online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/j&jsynthesconsent by following the instructions on the web-based 
form. If this Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov/#!home, you 
also may file a comment through that Web site.
    If you file your comment on paper, write ``Jonhson & Johnson, File 
No. 111 0160'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail or deliver 
it to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the 
Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20580. If possible, submit your paper comment to the 
Commission by courier or overnight service.
    Visit the Commission Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this 
Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws 
that the Commission administers permit the collection of public 
comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The 
Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that 
it receives on or before July 12, 2012. You can find more information, 
including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in the 
Commission's privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.

Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order to Aid Public Comment

I. Introduction

    The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted, subject 
to final approval, an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (``Consent 
Agreement'') from Johnson & Johnson (``J&J''). The purpose of the 
proposed Consent Agreement is to remedy the anticompetitive effects 
that would otherwise result from J&J's acquisition of the volar distal 
radius plating system assets of Synthes, Inc. (``Synthes''). Under the 
terms of the proposed Consent Agreement, J&J is required to divest all 
assets (including intellectual property) related to its ``DVR'' volar 
distal radius plating system business to a third party, enabling that 
third party to make and sell the DVR for the treatment of distal radius 
wrist fractures.
    The proposed Consent Agreement has been placed on the public record 
for thirty days to solicit comments from interested persons. Comments 
received during this period will become part of the public record. 
After thirty days, the Commission will again review the proposed 
Consent Agreement and the comments received, and will decide whether it 
should withdraw from the proposed Consent Agreement or make it final.
    Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 26, 2011, 
J&J proposes to acquire Synthes in exchange for cash and voting 
securities in a transaction valued at approximately $21.3 billion. The 
Commission's complaint alleges that the proposed acquisition, if 
consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 
U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as 
amended, 15 U.S.C. 45, by combining the two largest competitors in the 
U.S. market for volar distal radius plating systems. The proposed 
Consent Agreement would remedy the alleged violations by replacing the 
competition that otherwise would be lost in these markets as a result 
of the acquisition.

II. The Parties

    J&J is a comprehensive and broad-based manufacturer of products 
related to all aspects of human health care. In 2011, J&J generated 
global sales of $65 billion and U.S. sales of $28.9 billion. J&J is 
divided into three business segments: Consumer, Pharmaceutical, and 
Medical Devices and Diagnostics. The products impacted by the proposed

[[Page 35980]]

transaction, volar distal radius plating systems, fall within J&J's 
Medical Devices and Diagnostics segment.
    Synthes is a medical device company that manufactures products in 
five main product groups: trauma, spine, cranio-maxillofacial, 
biomaterials, and power tools. In 2011, Synthes generated global sales 
of $3.97 billion worldwide and U.S. sales of $2.14 billion. Synthes's 
volar distal radius plating system sales are part of its trauma unit.

III. Volar Distal Radius Plating Systems

    Volar distal radius plates are internal fixation devices that are 
implanted surgically from the underside of the wrist to achieve and 
maintain proper alignment of the radius bone following a fracture. 
Distal radius fractures, which are fractures of the portion of the 
radius bone closest to the wrist, are among the most common fractures 
in the human body. Distal radius fractures generally occur as a result 
of an individual bracing for a fall, whether it is a routine slip and 
fall by an elderly patient with a weak bone structure or a high-energy 
fall by a young, active patient engaged in sporting activities.
    Most patients who experience distal radius fractures do not require 
surgical intervention and can be treated with simple casting. If the 
radius bone is displaced, however, it is almost always necessary to 
realign the fracture surgically. Volar distal radius plating systems 
are the primary option for treating displaced distal radius fractures 
in the United States. They are favored by surgeons because they provide 
solid fracture alignment, are easy to implant, and enable greater 
patient post-surgical freedom of movement and shorter patient recovery 
times. Other options exist to treat displaced distal radius fractures, 
but those alternative methods are typically used only in specialized 
cases. For the large percentage of displaced distal radius fractures, 
the clinical benefits of volar distal radius plating systems cannot be 
matched by the alternative products available on the market, and 
doctors and their patients would not switch to using products other 
than volar distal radius plating systems in response to a small but 
significant increase in the price of these systems.
    The U.S. market for volar distal radius plating systems is highly 
concentrated, with J&J and Synthes controlling over 70 percent of the 
market as measured by 2010 revenue. The design of the DVR incorporates 
unique, clinically relevant features that are protected by intellectual 
property rights. Many surgeons still consider the DVR to be the best 
volar distal radius plating system on the market, and it accounted for 
approximately 29 percent of U.S. volar distal radius sales in 2010. 
Synthes is the leading manufacturer of volar distal radius plating 
systems in the United States, and accounted for approximately 42 
percent of the market by 2010 revenue. Synthes's success selling distal 
radius plating systems derives in part from its leading position and 
strong clinical reputation in the overall trauma field. The next 
closest competitors to J&J and Synthes--Stryker and Acumed--would each 
be less than one-sixth the size of the combined firm.
    The relevant geographic market for volar distal radius plating 
systems is the United States. Volar distal radius plating systems are 
medical devices that are regulated by the United States Food and Drug 
Administration (``FDA''). Volar distal radius plating systems sold 
outside the United States, but not approved for sale in the United 
States, are not viable competitive alternatives for U.S. consumers and 
hence are not in the relevant market.

IV. Competitive Effects and Entry Conditions

    The acquisition would cause significant competitive harm in the 
market for volar distal radius plating systems. J&J and Synthes are the 
leading suppliers of volar distal radius plating systems and each 
other's most significant competitors. J&J and Synthes have responded 
directly to competition from each other with lower prices and improved 
products. Although there are a number of other suppliers of volar 
distal radius plates, they have not gained significant traction among 
surgeons and have substantially smaller market shares than the merging 
parties. By eliminating its closest competitor, the acquisition would 
allow J&J to unilaterally raise prices in the market for volar distal 
radius plating systems.
    Entry would not be timely, likely, or sufficient in magnitude, 
character, and scope to deter or counteract the anticompetitive effects 
of the acquisition. Both J&J and Synthes employ patented technology in 
their volar distal radius plating systems. The patents owned by the two 
companies have prevented competitors from developing products that 
surgeons consider to be equally effective. Manufacturer product 
reputation and effective distribution also are important to surgeons 
and hospitals. Many fringe competitors are limited by their lack of a 
strong distribution system, and it would take a significant amount of 
time for one or more current fringe competitors to develop a sufficient 
reputation for quality, service, and consistency. Therefore, timely and 
sufficient entry in response to a small but significant price increase 
is unlikely.

V. The Proposed Consent Agreement

    The proposed Decision and Order resolves the competitive concerns 
raised by J&J's proposed acquisition of Synthes by requiring the 
divestiture of J&J's U.S. DVR assets to a qualified buyer no later than 
ten (10) days after the acquisition is consummated. The parties have 
selected Biomet, Inc. (``Biomet'') as the buyer for the assets to be 
divested. Although the Commission's competitive concerns are limited to 
the manufacture and sale of volar distal radius plating systems, the 
parties elected to divest the entire J&J trauma portfolio, including 
the volar distal radius plating systems, to Biomet. Biomet is a 
successful orthopedics company with a recognized brand name, an 
extensive nationwide sales force, and existing service relationships 
with surgeons and hospitals, but it currently has no meaningful 
presence in the volar distal radius plating or trauma product markets. 
Biomet is thus well positioned to replace the competition that will be 
eliminated as a result of the proposed transaction. A divestiture of 
J&J's volar distal radius assets will ensure that Biomet has a 
recognized high-quality volar distal radius plating system offering, 
enabling it to compete immediately with the merged entity.
    The Commission's merger remedies are intended to maintain or to 
restore the competitive status quo. Based on the evidence gathered in 
the investigation, the Commission has determined that the divestiture 
of J&J's volar distal radius plating system assets to Biomet should 
replicate the competitive conditions for volar distal radius plating 
systems that existed prior to the proposed transaction between J&J and 
Synthes.
    The proposed Consent Agreement contains a provision that allows the 
Commission to appoint an interim monitor to oversee J&J's compliance 
with all of its obligations and performance of its responsibilities 
pursuant to the Commission's Decision and Order. The interim monitor is 
required to file periodic reports with the Commission to ensure that 
the Commission remains informed about the status of the divestitures, 
about the efforts being made to accomplish the divestitures, and about 
the provision of services and assistance during the transition period 
to ensure the success of the DVR divestiture.
    Finally, the proposed Consent Agreement contains provisions that 
allow the Commission to appoint a

[[Page 35981]]

divestiture trustee if any or all of the above remedies are not 
accomplished within the time frames required by the Consent Agreement.
    The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the 
proposed Consent Agreement, and it is not intended to constitute an 
official interpretation of the proposed Decision and Order or to modify 
its terms in any way.

    By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-14660 Filed 6-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.