Safety Zone, Fireworks Display, Lake Superior; Duluth, MN, 35857-35859 [2012-14641]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
implementation of regulations at 33 CFR
part 165 that establish safety zones on
navigable waters of the United States for
fireworks events. These safety zones are
enforced for the duration of fireworks
display events. The fireworks are
launched from or immediately adjacent
to navigable waters of the United States
and may have potential for negative
impact on the safety or other interest of
waterway users and near shore activities
in the event area. The category of
activities includes fireworks launched
from barges at or near the shoreline that
generally rely on the use of navigable
waters as a safety buffer. This rule is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
35857
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. In § 165.506, amend the table as
follows:
■ a. Under ‘‘(b) Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore-COTP Zone,’’ suspend
number 5,
■ b. Under ‘‘(b) Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore-COTP Zone,’’ suspend
number 21, and
■ c. Under ‘‘(b) Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore-COTP Zone,’’ add numbers 26
and 27, to read as follows:
■
§ 165.506 Safety Zones; Fifth Coast Guard
District Fireworks Displays.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE TO § 165.506—ALL COORDINATES LISTED IN THE TABLE TO § 165.506 REFERENCE DATUM NAD 1983
Number
Date
Location
Regulated area
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore—COTP Zone
26 .........
*
*
June 16th, July 4th, September—2nd Saturday, December 31st.
*
*
Northwest Harbor (East Channel), Patapsco River, MD,
Safety Zone.
27 .........
July 3rd ......................................
Tred Avon River, Oxford, MD,
Safety Zone.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 4, 2012.
Mark P. O’Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
*
*
*
All waters of the Patapsco River within a 200 yards radius of the
fireworks barge in approximate position 39°15′54″ N,
076°34′40″ W, located adjacent to the East Channel of Northwest Harbor.
All waters of the Tred Avon River within a 150 yard radius of the
fireworks barge in approximate position latitude 38°41′24″ N,
longitude 076°10′37″ W, approximately 500 yards northwest
of the waterfront at Oxford, MD.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[FR Doc. 2012–14647 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am]
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0483]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Fireworks Display, Lake
Superior; Duluth, MN
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
Lake Superior near Duluth, MN on July
4, 2012. This zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Duluth area
of Lake Superior during the Duluth
Fourth Fest fireworks display. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
protect spectators and vessels from the
hazards associated with fireworks
displays.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 p.m.
to 11 p.m. on July 4, 2012
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
35858
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
2012–0483. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lt. Judson Coleman at 218–720–
5286 ext. 111 or by email at Judson.A.
Coleman@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this final
rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable. The final
details for this event were not known to
the Coast Guard until there was
insufficient time remaining before the
event to publish an NPRM. Thus,
delaying the effective date of this rule to
wait for a comment period to run would
be because it would inhibit the Coast
Guard’s ability to protect spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays, which are discussed
further below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
waiting for 30 day notice period run
would also be impracticable.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
B. Basis and Purpose
Between 7 p.m. and 11 p.m. on July
4, 2012, a fireworks display will occur
in the vicinity of Duluth Harbor in
Duluth, MN. Based on accidents that
have occurred in other Captain of the
Port zones and the explosive hazards of
fireworks, the Captain of the Port
Duluth has determined that fireworks
launches proximate to watercraft pose a
significant risk to public safety and
property. The likely combination of
large numbers of recreational vessels,
congested waterways, darkness
punctuated by bright flashes of light,
alcohol use, and debris falling into the
water could easily result in serious
injuries or fatalities. Establishing a
safety zone to control vessel movement
around the location of the launch
platform will help ensure the safety of
persons and property at these events
and help minimize the associated risks.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of spectators and
vessels during the setup, loading and
launching of a fireworks display in
conjunction with the Duluth Fourth Fest
fireworks display. The fireworks display
will occur between 7 p.m. and 11 p.m.
on July 4, 2012.
The safety zone for the fireworks will
encompass all U.S. navigable waters of
the Duluth Harbor Basin Northern
Section within a 600 foot radius of
position 46°46′47″ N., 092°06′10″ W.; at
Duluth, MN. (DATUM: NAD 83).
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or the on-scene
representative. Entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Marine Safety Unit
Duluth or his on-scene representative.
The Captain of the Port or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this rule is not
a significant regulatory action because
we anticipate that during the short time
this zone will be in effect, it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will
not interfere with other agencies, will
not adversely alter the budget of any
grant or loan recipients, and will not
raise any novel or legal policy issue.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will be in effect for only a
few hours on a single night. Also, vessel
traffic can safely pass outside the safety
zone during the event. Additionally,
vessels may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Duluth to transit
through the safety zone.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishing a safety zone. This rule is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
35859
2. Add § 165.T10–0483 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T10–0483 Safety zone; Fireworks
display, Lake Superior, Duluth, MN.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All waters of
Duluth harbor, Duluth, MN, within a
600 foot radius of position 46°46′47″ N,
092°06′10″ W.; at Duluth, MN (DATUM:
NAD 83).
(b) Effective and enforcement period.
This regulation is effective and will be
enforced from 7 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July
4, 2012. The Captain of the Port, Marine
Safety Unit Duluth, or his
on-scene representative may suspend
enforcement of the safety zones at any
time.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Marine Safety Unit
Duluth, or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port,
Marine Safety Unit Duluth or his
designated on-scene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port, Marine
Safety Unit Duluth or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port, Marine
Safety Unit Duluth or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: May 21, 2012.
K.R. Bryan,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2012–14641 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35857-35859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14641]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0483]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Fireworks Display, Lake Superior; Duluth, MN
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on
Lake Superior near Duluth, MN on July 4, 2012. This zone is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of the Duluth area of Lake Superior
during the Duluth Fourth Fest fireworks display. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to protect spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 4, 2012
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-
[[Page 35858]]
2012-0483. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lt. Judson Coleman at 218-720-5286 ext. 111 or by email
at Judson.A.Coleman@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. The
final details for this event were not known to the Coast Guard until
there was insufficient time remaining before the event to publish an
NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date of this rule to wait for a
comment period to run would be because it would inhibit the Coast
Guard's ability to protect spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays, which are discussed further below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for 30 day notice period run would
also be impracticable.
B. Basis and Purpose
Between 7 p.m. and 11 p.m. on July 4, 2012, a fireworks display
will occur in the vicinity of Duluth Harbor in Duluth, MN. Based on
accidents that have occurred in other Captain of the Port zones and the
explosive hazards of fireworks, the Captain of the Port Duluth has
determined that fireworks launches proximate to watercraft pose a
significant risk to public safety and property. The likely combination
of large numbers of recreational vessels, congested waterways, darkness
punctuated by bright flashes of light, alcohol use, and debris falling
into the water could easily result in serious injuries or fatalities.
Establishing a safety zone to control vessel movement around the
location of the launch platform will help ensure the safety of persons
and property at these events and help minimize the associated risks.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels during the setup, loading and launching of a
fireworks display in conjunction with the Duluth Fourth Fest fireworks
display. The fireworks display will occur between 7 p.m. and 11 p.m. on
July 4, 2012.
The safety zone for the fireworks will encompass all U.S. navigable
waters of the Duluth Harbor Basin Northern Section within a 600 foot
radius of position 46[deg]46'47'' N., 092[deg]06'10'' W.; at Duluth,
MN. (DATUM: NAD 83).
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the on-scene representative. Entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Marine Safety Unit Duluth
or his on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this rule is
not a significant regulatory action because we anticipate that during
the short time this zone will be in effect, it will have minimal impact
on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will
not raise any novel or legal policy issue.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will be in effect for only a few hours on a single night.
Also, vessel traffic can safely pass outside the safety zone during the
event. Additionally, vessels may request permission from the Captain of
the Port Duluth to transit through the safety zone.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the
[[Page 35859]]
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INTFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves establishing a safety zone. This rule
is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T10-0483 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T10-0483 Safety zone; Fireworks display, Lake Superior,
Duluth, MN.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
waters of Duluth harbor, Duluth, MN, within a 600 foot radius of
position 46[deg]46'47'' N, 092[deg]06'10'' W.; at Duluth, MN (DATUM:
NAD 83).
(b) Effective and enforcement period. This regulation is effective
and will be enforced from 7 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 4, 2012. The
Captain of the Port, Marine Safety Unit Duluth, or his on-scene
representative may suspend enforcement of the safety zones at any time.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Marine Safety Unit Duluth, or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Marine Safety Unit Duluth or
his designated on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port, Marine Safety Unit Duluth
or his on-scene representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must
comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of the Port,
Marine Safety Unit Duluth or his on-scene representative.
Dated: May 21, 2012.
K.R. Bryan,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2012-14641 Filed 6-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P