Safety Zone; F/V Deep Sea, Penn Cove, WA, 35850-35852 [2012-14640]
Download as PDF
35850
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to
use voluntary consensus standards in
their regulatory activities unless the
agency provides Congress, through the
Office of Management and Budget, with
an explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing a temporary safety
zone. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 subpart C as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0377, to read as
follows:
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads, Virginia can be contacted at
telephone number (757) 638–6637.
(4) U.S. Coast Guard vessels enforcing
the safety zone can be contacted on
VHF–FM marine band radio, channel 13
(156.65 MHz) and channel 16 (156.8
MHz).
(d) Enforcement period: This rule will
be enforced from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m.
on July 3, 2012, with a rain date of July
4, 2012 from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m.
Dated: May 14, 2012.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012–14727 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2011–1007]
RIN 1625–AA00
■
Safety Zone; F/V Deep Sea, Penn Cove,
WA
§ 165.T05–0377 Safety Zone, Fourth of
July Fireworks Event, Pagan River,
Smithfield, VA.
AGENCY:
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: specified waters of the
Captain of the Port Sector Hampton
Roads zone, as defined in 33 CFR 3.25–
10, within 420 feet of position 36°59′18″
N/076°37′45″ W (NAD 1983) in the
vicinity of Clontz Park in Smithfield,
VA.
(b) Definition. For purposes of
enforcement of this section, Captain of
the Port Representative means any U.S.
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads, Virginia to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulation. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in 165.23 of this
part, entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a U.S.
Coast Guard Ensign; and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a U.S.
Coast Guard Ensign.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone around the
Fishing Vessel (F/V) Deep Sea, located
in Penn Cove, WA. This action is
necessary to ensure the safety of the
maritime public by preventing contact
with potential debris and or hazardous
material and allow emergency on-scene
vessels to respond to the incident by
prohibiting vessels from entering or
remaining in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
on June 15, 2012 until 11:59 p.m. on
June 15, 2012. This rule is effective with
actual notice for purposes of
enforcement from May 19, 2012 until
June 15, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2011–1007. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Ensign Nathaniel P. Clinger,
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard Sector Puget Sound; Coast Guard;
telephone 206–217–6323, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
publishing an NPRM would be
impracticable since immediate action is
necessary to protect maritime public
and response vessels in or around Penn
Cove, WA, from hazards created by a
sunken fishing vessel, which may
include debris and other potentially
hazardous materials, and requires
emergency response and salvage
operations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Normal notice and comment
procedures cannot be followed due to
the immediate threat of collision and/or
exposure to hazardous debris and/or
materials associated with the sunken
F/V Deep Sea.
B. Basis and Purpose
On the evening of May 13, 2012, the
F/V Deep Sea, sank after catching fire.
Containment and absorbent boom is
being used to mitigate any impact to the
environment from released hazardous
wastes. Multiple assets are on-scene
responding to contain and clean up
hazardous material, assess potential
environmental impact and/or response
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
and coordinate salvage operations. As a
result the Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone around the F/V Deep Sea,
located in Penn Cove, WA. The safety
zone created by this rule is necessary to
help ensure the safety of maritime
public and the personnel involved in
response and salvage operations with
regard to the sunken F/V Deep Sea. It
prevents navigation in areas where
response and salvage vessels may be
operating and that may contain debris or
hazardous materials produced from and
as a result of the sunken F/V Deep Sea.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone which encompasses all
waters within 200 yards of the F/V Deep
Sea, sunken in Penn Cove, WA. Vessels
wishing to enter the zone must request
permission for entry by contacting onscene patrol craft on VHF CH 13 or Joint
Harbor Operation Center at (206) 217–
6001. Once permission for entry is
granted, vessels must proceed at a
minimum speed necessary for safe
navigation.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This rule is not a significant
regulatory action due to being limited in
size and duration.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will
affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: the owners
or operators vessels intending to transit
the affected waterway during the period
mentioned. This safety zone will not
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35851
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because the zone established in this rule
is limited in size and vessels may transit
through area with permission from the
COTP.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
35852
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:55 Jun 14, 2012
Jkt 226001
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of an emergency safety
zone. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and Recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add § 165.T13–220 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–220 Safety Zone; F/V Deep Sea,
Penn Cove, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is
designated as a safety zone: All waters
encompassing 200 yards of the Fishing
Vessel Deep Sea located at
approximately 48°13′18″ N, 122°47′42″
W, Penn Cove, WA.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR 165,
Subpart C, vessels wishing to enter the
zone must request permission for entry
by contacting the Joint Harbor Operation
Center at (206) 217–6001 or the onscene patrol craft on VHF CH 13. Once
permission for entry is granted vessels
must proceed at a minimum speed
necessary for safe navigation.
(c) Enforcement period. This rule will
be effective from 12 a.m. on May 19,
2012 until 11:59 p.m. on June 15, 2012
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
unless cancelled sooner by the Captain
of the Port.
Dated: May 18, 2012.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2012–14640 Filed 6–14–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0488]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Multiple Firework
Displays in Captain of the Port, Puget
Sound Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing safety zones in Boston
Harbor, Holmes Harbor, Port Gardner
and Port Townsend for various summer
fireworks displays. The safety zones are
necessary to help ensure the safety of
the maritime public during the displays
and will do so by prohibiting all persons
and vessels from entering the safety
zones unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 5 p.m.
on July 3, 2012, until 1 a.m. on July 5,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2012–0488. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email ENS Anthony P. LaBoy, Coast
Guard Sector Puget Sound, Waterways
Management Division; telephone 206–
217–6323, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35850-35852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14640]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2011-1007]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; F/V Deep Sea, Penn Cove, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around the
Fishing Vessel (F/V) Deep Sea, located in Penn Cove, WA. This action is
necessary to ensure the safety of the maritime public by preventing
contact with potential debris and or hazardous material and allow
emergency on-scene vessels to respond to the incident by prohibiting
vessels from entering or remaining in the safety zone unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port or his Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR on June 15, 2012 until 11:59
p.m. on June 15, 2012. This rule is effective with actual notice for
purposes of enforcement from May 19, 2012 until June 15, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2011-1007. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE.,
[[Page 35851]]
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Ensign Nathaniel P. Clinger, Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; Coast Guard; telephone 206-
217-6323, email SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because publishing an NPRM would be
impracticable since immediate action is necessary to protect maritime
public and response vessels in or around Penn Cove, WA, from hazards
created by a sunken fishing vessel, which may include debris and other
potentially hazardous materials, and requires emergency response and
salvage operations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Normal notice and comment
procedures cannot be followed due to the immediate threat of collision
and/or exposure to hazardous debris and/or materials associated with
the sunken F/V Deep Sea.
B. Basis and Purpose
On the evening of May 13, 2012, the F/V Deep Sea, sank after
catching fire. Containment and absorbent boom is being used to mitigate
any impact to the environment from released hazardous wastes. Multiple
assets are on-scene responding to contain and clean up hazardous
material, assess potential environmental impact and/or response and
coordinate salvage operations. As a result the Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone around the F/V Deep Sea, located in Penn
Cove, WA. The safety zone created by this rule is necessary to help
ensure the safety of maritime public and the personnel involved in
response and salvage operations with regard to the sunken F/V Deep Sea.
It prevents navigation in areas where response and salvage vessels may
be operating and that may contain debris or hazardous materials
produced from and as a result of the sunken F/V Deep Sea.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone which encompasses all
waters within 200 yards of the F/V Deep Sea, sunken in Penn Cove, WA.
Vessels wishing to enter the zone must request permission for entry by
contacting on-scene patrol craft on VHF CH 13 or Joint Harbor Operation
Center at (206) 217-6001. Once permission for entry is granted, vessels
must proceed at a minimum speed necessary for safe navigation.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This rule is not a
significant regulatory action due to being limited in size and
duration.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators vessels intending to transit
the affected waterway during the period mentioned. This safety zone
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities because the zone established in this rule is limited in
size and vessels may transit through area with permission from the
COTP.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
[[Page 35852]]
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of an emergency
safety zone. This rule is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
Recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-220 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-220 Safety Zone; F/V Deep Sea, Penn Cove, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is designated as a safety zone:
All waters encompassing 200 yards of the Fishing Vessel Deep Sea
located at approximately 48[deg]13'18'' N, 122[deg]47'42'' W, Penn
Cove, WA.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR 165, Subpart C, vessels wishing to enter the zone must request
permission for entry by contacting the Joint Harbor Operation Center at
(206) 217-6001 or the on-scene patrol craft on VHF CH 13. Once
permission for entry is granted vessels must proceed at a minimum speed
necessary for safe navigation.
(c) Enforcement period. This rule will be effective from 12 a.m. on
May 19, 2012 until 11:59 p.m. on June 15, 2012 unless cancelled sooner
by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: May 18, 2012.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2012-14640 Filed 6-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P